traded my 2011 GMC SLT crew for a 2015 5.0 XLT crew and the differences are astonishing,Ford def thought this truck out alot better than GM did,its faster,rides better,quieter ,better braking and 10x more storage ..Im a ford fan !
Same thing with Dodge. You need to set the gear by pressing the button on the shifter. The gear will appear on your console and it will trick the engine into thinking you are hauling and disable cylinder deactivation. If you have 6 gears you need to select up until you see 6 so the computer can upshift and downshift all gears. Otherwise it won't upshift past the number selected. I typically wait until I get into the last gear then press the set button.
I've had MANY different vehicles in my 61 years on this planet, and my 2016 F-150 King Ranch 4WD, 5.0 V-8, is the absolute BEST vehicle I've ever owned! I've had Camaros, Mazda 4wd, Olds Cutlass, 66' Fairlane 500, 2000 F-150, Scout II, Chevy Silverado, Ford Flex, 98' Expedition, 2013 Expedition, 2014 Cadillac CTS4, ... and more that I haven't mentioned. My 2016 F-150 King Ranch beats EVERY SINGLE ONE!
I have a 2015 XLT 4x4 SuperCrew with the 5.0 and I absolutely love it !! My truck is very similar as far as equipment goes , I also have the 302A package and love all the features that it includes . I opted for the center console and am glad I did , love the extra storage it provides and also the fact that they're are two vents for rear passengers at the back of the console as well as power outlets for phones tablets ect . I have the Magnetic Metallic paint job and I love it . I've had mine since September 30 '15 and have a little over 6K miles on it and no problems what so ever thus far . Handles great , rides great , awesome power - when you step on this baby she will absolutely fly . Glad I went with the SuperCrew over SuperCab, had a SuperCab before and liked it but I like this more . I had a spray on bedliner installed by Line X and they did a great job I love it . I also bought a tri fold tonneau cover , a Extang Solid Fold 2.0 and I really like it as well . The only thing that I am disappointed with is the stereo, I wish it had more ass behind it . It's something I will probably look into upgrading , a subwoofer and amp , maybe higher quality speakers in the doors as well . Great video , nice truck and hope you continue to have good luck with it !!
+MSI Gamer using that same logic Friend...remove the fire extinguisher from your home...your Paranoid....you've got the fire department of something goes wrong......silly logic ;)
My dad own a 2015 ford f150 XLT crewcab 5.0 with the e85 package and my family love the truck it good reliable it never let us down we only have few problems but it not a problem(the tires sensor are fault and the step down cover plastic broke)but still it a good truck no engine issues my dad went from 5.4 guy to a 5.0 lover and now he happy with it and he still gojng keep it
My neighbor has a new FX4 Lariat 5.0 and loves it. She didn't want an EcoBoost and pulls a 30ish foot camper trailer. It does an outstanding job towing.
I just traded my 2007 f150 with a 5.4 triton in on a 2017 f150 crew cab with a 5.0. I love it the truck is amazing,the fuel mileage is over double my 5.4 and so fun to drive and so much power.love the truck.
Great video, man. I never would've guessed I could last 20+ minutes listening to someone talk about their truck, but you definitely fooled me. There's no way I could ever pull that off lol. Props bro!
IMO a crew cab is always a must. versatility and resale value are just a couple of the benefits. I keep "safety equipment" in my glove box too. the 5.0L V8 is awesome. beautiful truck, great owner review!
SAME! Mt 16' Taco has had the following issues: trans slamming into gear from R to D, they reprogrammed it only to now cause it to slip while shifting 1-3. The brakes on the back literally froze up with fluid and all ok in traffic a few times. Front brakes are having some bad brake hop issues as well. The thing ran like a total TURD for a month. I had to cause a scene in the middle of the dealership to get them to check the oil level. They said look sir, the computer says its fine. I said take the plug off and LOOK. Sure enough was 2-3 quarts low. This is coming after me buying a 15' brand new which the head was cast wrong and it was just shit. Tacomas aren't what they were.
A crew cab with the 6.5 bed is definitely too long. They're already pushing it at 144" ish wheelbases in terms of getting in and out of certain places like parking structures or small city parking lots.
Thanks for posting this video! I am planning on trading in my 2009 Toyota Tacoma next week for a new 2016 F-150 with the Fx4 package. Taking the weekend to really think about it. I am in the market for a basic 4WD truck that would give me the long service life that a Tacoma offers. Ford has some irresistible end year incentives going on. Base XL trim and a 5.0V8 was a must. The salesman was trying to put me in higher trim Ecoboosts but I was not interested. I will take simplicity over expensive and unreliable tech any day.
I sold my 2010 super cab for a 2015 crew cab XLT sport and the extra room makes a big difference. My kids are almost out of smacking range LOL jk. All joking aside it was worth the extra money I think. There's more room on the floor in the back as well for additional hauling if no one is using rear seats.
I've had my big horn Hemi Ram three months ago I've really enjoyed it it's a 4wd I got a really good deal on it 13,000 off, you got a good looking truck great video
i bought a brand new 2015 f-150 xlt 2.7 ecoboost. it had a rattling sound coming from turbo and ford wont fix it for me. they told me to turn up my music so i cant hear it. and i am also a loyal ford employee
In late 2016 I bought a brand new 2015 left over crew cab 6.5ft box xlt truck. RWD only and I've been pretty happy with mine as well. Had to deal with some of those early recalls but otherwise happy. Drove it on the IKE gauntlet and boy did it do well.
nice video I'm going to be getting an f150 here within the next few months. I'm also leaning towards the 5.0 V8 over the ecoboost. I don't want the headaches of dealing with a turbo engine. I did a build & price on the XLT trim and I'm pretty sure that's available in the sport appearance package.
Nice review, I needed two trucks for my company (tax write off reasons). We have always had a Ram Cummins diesel and a new gas Ram. Picked up two of the 15's on sale one decked out xlt 2.7 eco and 1 base xl 5.0 with sport package, 4x4, and tuxedo black (all super cabs). Regardless of me being the owner one of guys fell in love with the 2.7 xlt and claimed it (jacked it) without giving me a chance. Not that big of a deal because I had a new Ram with all the bells and whistles so I took the spartan what I thought was a pos 5.0 v8 I knew nothing about. Long story short I am averaging the exact same gas mileage 19mpg highway/city mixed as the 2.7 ecoboost. He runs premium for the turbos I run regular unleaded so I pay about 20% less on fuel. We are high up in the mountains of CO so I have driven in non stop serious snow and ice and its handled flawlessly.. On a highway trip the other day I averaged 23 mpg but mind you I have the lighter supercab and mine is geared for highway driving. The V8 always puts a smile on my face and I am glad I have the spartan truck simply because of the V8 now. Taking her for the first 1500 mile oil change tomorrow and switching it to mobile 1 full synthetic 5w 20. Oh and before I forget I sold the Dodges because this thing can tow almost 10k lbs which is more than we pickup. Walked out of the Subaru dealer with a new free and clear 2016 WRX because this base xl ford was all the truck I needed so the loaded gas Dodge went the way of the diesel and sold. Only complaint I have is Fords service center is a joke compared to Dodge and Ford never had the guts Dodge had in 2015 with the 100k mile power train warranty and Mopar sold me a unlimited time and mileage lifetime warranty for 2300. Ford wouldn't sell me anything close to what Mopar offers so lets hope these trucks are tough
+Andrew Smith Thanks for your comment, I'm glad you like the truck! I love the 2.7 Eco and 3.5L Eco but there is just something about that V8 that both Eco's do can't produce combined :) Nice that you ended up getting two new trucks and a new WRX ! You should start a channel lol ;)
Thanks so much for your information, because ,l am thinking to buy a use not too old dependable truck no too old and what you are saying it has been very helpful to me , thank you again. Take care and be safe .
+jldude84 I would stay far away from a 2.7 in a 1/2 ton. Ford may be pushing the idea that its great but i'm very skeptical. Lack of displacement for hauling heavy loads makes me question the longevity of these motors.
+jldude84 I'm very skeptical of those posted mpg claims. They pretty much match exactly what It's possible for me to achieve measuring from fill up to fill up on calm, warm days in my 4200 pound standard cab, with 3.31 regular rear axle, and 2.7EB. However, my trip meter would likely indicate 1.5 mpg higher, and if I'm just cruising down the road and at a point and time, glance down at the trip meter, I could see a number even higher, but that is in no way a measure of fuel economy, but is what I suspect when I see someone claiming 5 mpg over the EPA estimate.
+FloppyBit The folks locked in to this idea that the V8 is some kind of magic engine refuse to learn the concepts of other technologies. The EBs are smaller displacement, but get boost from twin turbos. There is nothing wrong with having skepticism regarding the turbos themselves or worrying about a new engine versus an older, proven engine, such as the Coyote, but folks stating these EBs will wear out sooner due to higher revving or more compression do not understand the technology. The EBs perform nothing like base, naturally-aspired V6s that have traditionally been planted in full-size trucks. Ford's base V6 has peak torque coming way up over 4000 RPM, and it's something like 265. That's the kind of engine that will work harder to do heavy, truck- like work. Conversely, the 2.7 EB V6 achieves 375 at 3000 RPM, and the 3.5 achieves 420 at 2500. The Coyote V8 produces 387 at 3850. Moreover, the two EBs run at a lower compression ratio than either of Ford's NA engines. There is nothing in the character of either of these EBs that indicate they'd be over worked more than your beloved V8.
That's certainly more believable and amazing mpg for a full-size truck with a very capable V8. Ford has done well with this truck and all the engines, save the base V6. The difference between 23 and 25 is huge. It took truck makers 25 years to get 2 more mpg. At those figures, that's 8.6% . It's possible to squeeze out a couple more with the 2.7 EB, but only in the smaller, lighter versions and conservative driving, and so I'm thinking the 5.0 and 3.5 EB are better suited to the bigger trucks, 4WD, etc., as that smaller EB mpg diminishes up the line.
Mine averages 1.7 less than the computer, but the error is not consistent. The error is in the "gallons used" data. It's way under represented. Up to 1.6 gallons shy of actual fill up.
You willl see a big improvement in road grip and responsiveness if you upgrade those GY Wranglers. I went with a Falken tire that is actually more aggressive off road but grips better on road. The tire scrub in turns went away.
NIce truck, I just moved up to an F250 though due to my towing needs. My old F150 did me well though. Looked almost new after 103,000 miles and no mechanical issues. Only thing that ever broke was one of the hangers in the rear passenger compartment. Hopefully my new truck serves me as well.
Another excellent video. I am looking at full sized trucks and the F150 is at the top of the list. This information has been very helpful. keep up the good work.
+SteelCity1981 Well, yes, if money is know object. The Ram ED starts at least $10K more than I can purchase a base-model Ram. The Colorado/Canyon--even worse. Starts at least $12K more than base, and its a 4 cylinder with cast-iron block and solenoid injectors. My guess is that if Ford does bring the Lion to the F150, aluminum body, more expensive transmission, engine more costly than even the ED that Ram sources VM (FCA is part owner of Italian engine maker), it will be extremely limited: to the Screw, and the highest trim levels; $42K minimum, as Ford will not likely be willing to lose margin on a dog idea.Diesel trucks in the light duty sector are absolutely valid, but only if and when they become more cost competitive with spark ignition at which point the manufacturers can match the right engines to the right configurations. Right now, we're getting what should be base diesel engines planted in only in the versions that need the most performance, and that's because a diesel worthy for heavy towing and hauling would cost even more to build and certify, and due to current emissions strategies limited by current technologies, would not significantly improve mpg employing V8s or larger sixes in half tons and below. And putting smaller sixes and fours in cheaper trims and configuration would cause too much sticker shock for the customer. So right now, its only about having the mpg crown and to pick up some extra margin from those who refuse spark plugs on their truck.
***** yeah and it will also last 500,000 miles. as for maintence the cost is cheaper and less frequent than gas is . i own a 2003 f250 diesel with 300,000 miles on it and it still runs great and i havent hardy had to do any engine maintence on it so idont know what you are talking about
+Steven Simpkins I'm not sure such a determination can be made simply on the basis of ignition type. While there are examples of 500K diesel engines in the past, particularly in the semi tractor industry from Cummins and Detroit before all this pollution reduction stuff had to go into high gear, in the light duty sector, where diesels must be much less costly to build, much lighter and many more horses per liter output, there have been some very good products and some not so good products; some can outlast an average spark ignition engine and some not. Look to Europe where diesels hold almost 50% market share. It depends on the design and quality control.As for oil changes, fuel costs, repair, there are alot of factors. If a diesel takes off-the-shelf oil like Rotella, and has extended changes around 15K like some do, and fuel prices stay right around the price of regular unleaded, then the equation works if one chooses an engine based on value or payback.It also depends on what trim level and configuration. As one goes up the price point, the diesel gets more affordable by comparison, because there is more and more margin to play with. But if one is in the market for a $30K truck, but only with a diesel and is expecting to pay an extra $4-$5K, that truck is not going to be available.The only segment where this small premium for a diesel can be found in a near base truck is in the commercial van segment. One can get a Transit with an I5 powerstroke or a ProRam ED for an extra $5K, but that means going from a $35K to a $40K van, and the only way to make a truck out of that is to order a cab chassis and then have a body built and installed. Those options will start you at $45K in a very basic vehicle.
Nice. Our neighbor just got a leftover 2015 XLT (302a) 4x4 crew cab/5.5 bed with a 3.5 Ecoboost in the Caribou brown color. Actually is a sharp color. Got a smokin deal being a leftover model. Threw a check engine light 2 miles off the lot, truck had 18 total miles on it....lol. Took it back in and they reset it, been fine ever since. They figure it was just from being moved around the lot for however long it was there and never really getting any driving besides a bunch of start ups and shut downs around the dealership. I agree with you. Although the XLTs are nice if I were in the market for a new F150 I'd have to think about upgrading to the Lariat if I could swing the cost. Has a few gadgets like the auto 4x4 you mentioned that I'd be interested in. One thing you might be able to answer. I notice that Ford offers a spray in bedliner as an option. Do that outsource that to Line-x or Rhino or is it their own?
+klc317 Nice for them! I like that Caribou color as well :) When we have spray in liners done for customers (if the truck don't already have it) we outsource it and have a Rhino liner put in, there have been times where the truck has it already and I guess it's been Ford themselves putting it in then.
+klc317 I have the "spray in" bedliner. They shouldn't call it that. Each panel is sprayed separately then assembled. The bottom edge as well as around the wheel well is opened to the elements. I purchased flex black caulking and fixed it.
mine is Oxford Black, 2015 F150, V8, Supercab, XLT. The same as yours. Yes the motor is awesome. mine is averaging 18.7 mph the last 10000 miles. Cruising 62mph it get 24mph. I love mine also. mine is a lot cleaner cause I don't have a 6 year old in the back seat.
I've had to get the cowl under the wipers replaced because of a bad gasket. And then the dealer burnt up the washer pump, so that's been replaced as well.
If you are looking for longevity and reliability, go for a NA engine like the 5.0L V8, I own a Turbo charged vehicle and they are great when new, but when you get up in miles the extra stress on the engine shows, as well as higher maintenance with turbo system and the mileage on mine sucks. My sister in law has a 2002 Ford Escape AWD 3.0L V6 with 360,000 miles on it, and it's only needed a new fuel pump and is still running good.
+ron mortensen Show me where the extra stress shows up. It's not in revolutions, as a DI, turbo will likely turn slower at any given output as NA. It's not in compression, as most are in the 10:1 range just like NAs. They do force more air (and in the case of spark ignition) more fuel through the delivery system, and they do have the turbo component that can go bad of it's a bad design or is abused, but my VW TDI ran like new at 165K and see no reason why it would not top 300K.There are good and bad examples of every engine type, but in general, as far as engine wear specifically endemic to the technology as a whole, there is nothing about DI, turbo charging that makes them wear faster.
+Gregory Faulkner The compression ratio, is basically the volumetric difference of the cylinder from the piston at the bottom of the stroke to the top. The turbo forces in more dense air, which results in a more powerful power stroke, which is where the extra stress comes from, that also creates more heat than a NA engine. A good design has a lot to do with durability, but overall most people agree that a NA engine will out last a FI engine. Read about Static and Dynamic compression ratios.
+ron mortensen Wikipedia confirms your definition but your missing something, because over at Ford's engine specs page, the two EBs are rated at 10.0:1, while the base V6 is rated at 10.8:1, and the Coyote is rated at 10.4:1, right opposite of the basis of your argument. Secondly, the peak torque and the RPM at which peak torque is achieved favors the EBs for long engine life, since they'll likely turn fewer revolutions over time than the NAs despite the smaller displacement. When each of the engines are called on for all available torque, the larger EB needs 2500 RPM, the 2.7 needs 3000, the 5.0 NA needs 3850, and the base V6 will sound like it's getting ready to melt down at 4250.Thirdly, even if it were true that the compression ratios were higher on these particular EBs versus these NAs, some of the most durable engines ever produced had as high as 22:1 compression ratios, and even today's modern diesels have over 16:1, yet short engine life is not a normal complaint from diesel owners.
+Gregory Faulkner It still depends if they are built for the extra boost, like a diesel, but diesels run at lower RPM's, and diesel fuel lubricates much better. The turbo's run hot, which is why they have lower compression ratio's, to avoid requiring high octane fuel. The NA's can run at higher compression ratio's without pre detonation, and yes their power comes on at higher RPM's, but at speed that much power isn't needed. But hey, I hope these new turbo engines last forever like you do, but I do think auto makers should keep a larger NA engine or two as options for people who want them.
I concede that the turbos themselves are a worry and a concern and only time will tell. If the design ends up being lacking in any way as part of the whole package, just like any modern engine, longevity will suffer and it'll be costly for the consumer. My point is just that we should not assume that any major technology applied to an ICE is inferior to tried and true technologies just because it is not as common and there should not be this ongoing assumption that a small-block V8 is the best that will ever come along. And we should keep in mind that, the manufacturers are likewise trying to get more with less out of these NAs as well and using other different strategies with them as well to keep power and improve mpg, as GM has learned with cylinder deactivation and the headaches that has caused some buyers with their NA V8s.
If 6,5ft of bed is too much for you and the supercab is too small to carry people around why don't you buy a Dodge Caravan ? It's just funny how people will spend almost $40k on a 4x4 XLT or even more on a Lariat, Platinum or King Ranch just to drive around with empty beds and no trailers at 17mpg. If you really NEED a truck, a basic XL will do just fine. And no you don't need 4x4 to drive on the highway (or even in the city for that matter) in snow, most people get by just fine with a Honda Civic.
Just an FYI on what is in my opinion the BIGGEST change from 15 to 16... Ford added reinforcement to this exact model (extended cab) in 2016. For some reason they put the reinforcement into all other body configurations except the extended cab for 2015. Long story longer this exact model received bad crash test ratings because of this.
I have a '15 with the 2.7 and it drives great. Biggest complaint is the seats. Very uncomfortable. The lumbar is too aggressive even when completely deflated. makes longer drives very painful.
Also, I do with I waited until the 2016 to have the updated Sync system. And a different dealership so as to have gotten the LED headlights. But here's to hope for the 2017 Raptor and enough cash to get it.
Another outstanding video and probably the most important for me seeing the 150 is my next vehicle. So a couple of questions I hope you can help me with to make a decision. My mind is set on the limited model. However I see the raptor is coming out end of year. Is the raptor a WAY too aggressive model for everyday driving? I'm not taking it off road at all but I love the mean look to it. Additionally I really like the idea of the 10 speed transmission. I can wait for the 2017 raptor but if I do and it's too aggressive do I also wait on the limited until it packs the 10 speed transmission. Thanks in advance.
+adawg1203 Thank you ! To be honest, I dont know more about the Raptor then you do i'm sure, it is not out yet so I have not been able to put my hands on one and drive it. I know the older raptor did just fine as an everyday truck although it was horrible on gas because of the 6.2L. I would not mind to have the 10 speed transmission in our truck either :)
Unfortunately the crash tests on the SuperCab are horrible compared to the previous generation. For safety reasons the Crew cab is the one people should be leaning towards.
+Gurmeet Singh Both configurations obtain a 'Good' rating on every IIHS crash test, minus the small overlap crash. The SuperCrew gets a 'Good' rating while the SuperCab does poorly, solely due to steel reinforcements in the chassis. Ford is already aware of this problem and they promised improvements in the 2016 model.
in my 04 f150, the supercab just makes the front seat area smaller to allow bigger back seats. I'm glad i didnt get the 4 door. Same bed length though. Not sure about the new ones.
You could have gotten a 6.5 ft bed in a crew cab. That's what I have. I wish I had the 302 package with the sport appearance package though . I have the 301 with chrome appearance package. And I wish I had the lariat too hindsight...
+rpaul247 I mention in the video that I don't want a crew cab with the 6.5 Ft bed.. just feel it's to long then and we don't need a 6.5 bed, I do want the crew cab though :)
Question. These aren't exactly cheap. Why this vs say an Expedition Limited or maybe even sport? I note the bed hasn't been scratched and it isn't equipped for towing with a brake controller. (that I could see).
+Bruno TaTa We have utilized the bed many times but not for heavy duty stuff that really scratches up the bed badly, mainly it was wifey who was dead set on having a truck so we got it, she didn't want an SUV. For instance this past weekend we got to really use the bed of the truck when we first got a new bed and then also loaded it up with a LOT of stuff for our garden. It's true, we don't use the bed of the truck that often - but for those few times we REALLY need it is why she wanted a truck.
Yeah, I have a '12 FX4 I used in my business till this year. Solid reliable, never been to the shop once, and it's great to have the truck bed. But it just drives so big compared to a sedan, I'm thinking of something that handles and brakes better while still given some utility.. I meant Explorer sport, btw. The Edge sport in black is probably just what we need (no kids, 4 dogs) but they're mid $40's even with discounts, and that's getting close to Luxury brand price. I actually prefer the prev gen styling on the Edge, too.
I own a 2016 F-150 XLT Supercrew with a 6.5' box and sport package. You won't find it too long to drive and yes you can get the premium sound system in the xlt. I have the system with the sub woofer. I've only had the truck for a few weeks but have found something odd about it and had dealer examine it. When I shut off the truck or just come back and open a door the sound system is activated. Now I don't mean the radio is on but it is activated. You can hear the sub slightly on with a small amount of what sounds like voices. After about 4 minutes the sub goes boom and then everything shuts off till the door opens and it starts all over again. The dealer found it odd as well and sent a question into Ford. There has been no response/fix yet.
Oh ok gotcha, maybe there is power still present in the ignition line, is that line hooked up to an ignition source that stays powered on after you turn the key off.
Thinking about buying used 15 or 16 soon. Is it easy maintenance as far as things like getting to the oil filter. I hate cars that are a pita to get to the oil filter.
20:30 the issue he mentions is 100% operator error, but 'no one should use this feature'. Maybe just don't forget the other key. Aaaaah technology. PEBCAK error. lol
Gotta say though, I'll give props to ford on this truck. You get pretty nice standard equipment with this truck, and not to mention they're able to fit 3 different engine options, a 2.7, 3.6, and 5.0. Never thought a v6 engine would have almost higher if not the same output as a v6!AutoVlog
I like toyota, but when it comes to trucks I like ram, but I never had real respect for ford's until now, and until I really looked into them. but ether way when it comes to trucks, I have developed a respect for all trucks. Ram, Chevy, Ford, and Toyota. To me It's just whatever you like and whatever floats you're boat. ☺
Less to break with a naturally aspirating V8 Coyote platform. Twin turbo 2.7 & 3.5 requires Super Unleaded to achieve advertised MPG. All turbos with any real acceleration naturally zap fuel. So between typically getting lower than adverstised MPG and the extra premium for the fuel PLUS long term additional repair costs if you are to own the vehicle to 150k....V8 absolutely makes a ton of sense.
+Nick Weber The 15 feels stronger, it has a 25 horsepower increase and it's 700 lbs lighter because of the aluminum body. When driving you can feel that it is a lot lighter.. No, I have not towed with the truck yet.
+AutoVlog thanks, I'm leaning towards the 5.0 when the 10 speed comes out because of the engine's simplicity vs the ecoboost complexity. Lurking on forums I get concerned with reports of boost pressure leaks and exhaust leaks. Perhaps my concern is unfounded, but I would hate to dump my old 7.3 (that I've already fixed all the leaks) and jump into a maintenance intense vehicle.
how did you remove the head cover from the front middle seat? I have the same truck except its a sport package with a full back seat but cant figure out how to remove the head cover on the front seat
+None I think that's from the middle rear seat,,, that's where I keep mine, on the floor next to the rear passenger side head rest. There is a big enough blind spot without them so I only put them in if I have passengers back there. To remove them pull it all of the way up, then there is a little "slide" that needs to be depressed to unlatch it and it should pull right out. It's in the owners manual. At least it is in mine.
I have that problem in my 2012 platinum screw. It's either the drives have splines need lube or the rear shocks are binding when they extend (stop) or collapse (take off from a stop). If you google it you'll find this affects lots of years and trim levels of f150
Dont step up to a Lariat just for a stereo system bro just get a XLT supercrew cab 5 1/2 FX4 5.0 V8 with a custom sound system. Itll probably sound much better than factory options and be cheaper with the fam an all. appearance package if you want
I just got a 2016 F150 with the 2.7L Eco on June 8th and man am I having regrets on not that getting the V8. I'm 22 and this is my first truck since I upgraded from my 99 mustang gt. Do you think I can take it back and pick out another one like a different color and with the V8? As in like will my down payment be able to transfer? Just asking because I really don't know.
+Hemi Power I went to the dealer last week and drove the 5.0 V8 and I definitely like the ecoboost better now that I know how they both feel..my Eco is a little rocket and picks up so quick compared to the 5.0
always best to test drive them all, and take a couple days to think about what you really want, made the same mistake too, but miss the v8 sound, but the turbos are cool too...
Hemi Power huh? I got the 2.7L Eco..thing is okay on gas and it picks up pretty damn good imo. Only regret getting the ecoboost because I keep thinking the V8 would of been the better choice in reliability 10 years down the road or so
Mike always does great reviews, just bought a 2017 XL STX 2.7 4WD Crew, love the truck, compared to ole Tacoma, comfort, plenty of power and great economy! Little worried about the turbos long term durability, but hopefully Ford knows best. Can't say I like the look better than the RAM, but compared to the HEMI economy is much much better. Mikes reviews helped me make my mind up, keep them reviews coming Mike!
AutoVlog I get about 18MPG on my 2003 Trailblazer (it's also a 4x4). I would have thought that 4x4 vehicles would have been little bit more fuel efficient in 2015-16.
women messing around and messing up the electronics lol. she thought 80mph was plenty even though the truck only does like 105mph max speed. you need that extra speed in case of emergency and the radio set at half? um why? radio in the F150 isn't that loud to begin with, obviously cause dude bitched the stereo could only go half way up. On my high power stereo system in my car, half way would be ear drum ringing loud. nobody messes with my car or my setting , but me. It's my car hands off BIATCH lol
I borrowed a friends 2012 f150 a few weeks back and i could feel the truck twisting and wobbling over every bump and well as the side of the cab shaking when closing the doors. Do the new fords still feel like that?
I don't get why people buy crew cabs with two foot beds. Reminds me of lesbians driving around in Subaru Bajas. Why not just admit you don't need a truck and get a sissy ass SUV?
Hmm I dunno.. maybe because they have a family to carry around and there's more room in a supercrew? How silly that you assume a 1 foot shorter bed means you don't need a truck. Newsflash: most people driving trucks don't NEED a truck. 90% of people driving 4x4's don't need those either. This is America and here people buy what they want - not what they need. Get over it.
moohuhahaaa Want vs need. Purpose-built vehicles vs Frankenstein monstrosities borne from a marketing executive's view of "what people want but don't know they want yet" idealisms. It's a compromise vehicle that makes no one happy. Like the Chevy Avalanche or the Pontiac Aztek -- two of the ugliest "compromise" vehicles ever made. This guy, if he could get over his own "truck addiction", really should be looking at a Ford Transit Van or a Ford Expedition, depending on his needs. A pickup truck with a 5.5' bed is stupid. It's not a truck anymore. It's a compromise vehicle that makes no one happy. That's my opinion which is different than yours -- something that happens in a democratic society. You get over it.
Zmoto, while I won't argue that the Pontiac Aztek and Chevy Avalanche are ugly, to suggest they "make no one happy" is a poor assessment. The Chevy Avalanche sold 625,206 vehicles over 13 years, and the Pontiac Aztek sold 119,662 over 8 years. Clearly, they made someone happy, albeit someone we wouldn't associate with. Nonetheless, they make bed extenders for a reason. I'm sure if this guy wanted a van or SUV, he'd purchase one. It seems to me he wants a truck, and like millions of other people, the short bed suits him just fine. Oh.. and technically we live in a republic ("..and to the republic, for which it stands..."), not a democracy. Our founding fathers criticized pure democracy. Just sayin'.
+Saki630 Did you even watch the video? He wasn't able to cruise above that speed because his wife played with the settings and accidentally restricted the speed of the truck.
My cousin just bought a 2017 f-150 king ranch 5.0 V8 last month and he loves it he stares out the window just to look at it
Lol i just got one and I stare at it sometimes to
traded my 2011 GMC SLT crew for a 2015 5.0 XLT crew and the differences are astonishing,Ford def thought this truck out alot better than GM did,its faster,rides better,quieter ,better braking and 10x more storage ..Im a ford fan !
+excelerater You just compared a new truck to an old one. Your opinion isn't justified at all.
yup but I test drove the 2016 GMC,,,its another failure
+excelerater huh?
when GM added that garbage called Cyl on demand or Active Fuel Mgt they IMO destroyed the drivetrain..That is the biggest hunk of shit ever invented
Same thing with Dodge. You need to set the gear by pressing the button on the shifter. The gear will appear on your console and it will trick the engine into thinking you are hauling and disable cylinder deactivation. If you have 6 gears you need to select up until you see 6 so the computer can upshift and downshift all gears. Otherwise it won't upshift past the number selected. I typically wait until I get into the last gear then press the set button.
I've had MANY different vehicles in my 61 years on this planet, and my 2016 F-150 King Ranch 4WD, 5.0 V-8, is the absolute BEST vehicle I've ever owned!
I've had Camaros, Mazda 4wd, Olds Cutlass, 66' Fairlane 500, 2000 F-150, Scout II, Chevy Silverado, Ford Flex, 98' Expedition, 2013 Expedition, 2014 Cadillac CTS4, ... and more that I haven't mentioned.
My 2016 F-150 King Ranch beats EVERY SINGLE ONE!
I have a 2015 XLT 4x4 SuperCrew with the 5.0 and I absolutely love it !! My truck is very similar as far as equipment goes , I also have the 302A package and love all the features that it includes . I opted for the center console and am glad I did , love the extra storage it provides and also the fact that they're are two vents for rear passengers at the back of the console as well as power outlets for phones tablets ect . I have the Magnetic Metallic paint job and I love it . I've had mine since September 30 '15 and have a little over 6K miles on it and no problems what so ever thus far . Handles great , rides great , awesome power - when you step on this baby she will absolutely fly . Glad I went with the SuperCrew over SuperCab, had a SuperCab before and liked it but I like this more . I had a spray on bedliner installed by Line X and they did a great job I love it . I also bought a tri fold tonneau cover , a Extang Solid Fold 2.0 and I really like it as well . The only thing that I am disappointed with is the stereo, I wish it had more ass behind it . It's something I will probably look into upgrading , a subwoofer and amp , maybe higher quality speakers in the doors as well . Great video , nice truck and hope you continue to have good luck with it !!
I literally have this same truck. Not the one in video the one this guy commented.
With all the same add ons
safety equipment......don't worry I carry a firearm in my truck as well! Better to have it and not need it, then to need it and not have it.
+Dazed Viking Agreed !
+Dazed Viking I picked up on that, too. "Safety" equipment.
im all for gun rights but keeping it in your truck is paranoid
+MSI Gamer using that same logic Friend...remove the fire extinguisher from your home...your Paranoid....you've got the fire department of something goes wrong......silly logic ;)
+MSI Gamer cops aren't always goin to be there for u
My dad own a 2015 ford f150 XLT crewcab 5.0 with the e85 package and my family love the truck it good reliable it never let us down we only have few problems but it not a problem(the tires sensor are fault and the step down cover plastic broke)but still it a good truck no engine issues my dad went from 5.4 guy to a 5.0 lover and now he happy with it and he still gojng keep it
Thanks for the review brother. Legit video! Considering buying a truck and found a full 4 door for $19k. I dig it
Awesome review dude !!! Thanks ! I got me a 2016 XLT sport
+Victor Deras Thanks ! The Sport trim is so nice, I wish I had it :)
Victor Deras how are you looking it?
My neighbor has a new FX4 Lariat 5.0 and loves it. She didn't want an EcoBoost and pulls a 30ish foot camper trailer. It does an outstanding job towing.
I would just like to clarify, the 4A option is not all-wheel drive. It is still 4x4. Just auto on-off. 4x4 and AWD are two totally different systems.
HAHA! "It's just pure, natural, there's no replacement for displacement" Amen.
This is false information
Who else is watching the video in 2019 after all the great mods. And no his engine now has 608hp and 500 pft after his supercharger
I just traded my 2007 f150 with a 5.4 triton in on a 2017 f150 crew cab with a 5.0. I love it the truck is amazing,the fuel mileage is over double my 5.4 and so fun to drive and so much power.love the truck.
Great video, man. I never would've guessed I could last 20+ minutes listening to someone talk about their truck, but you definitely fooled me. There's no way I could ever pull that off lol. Props bro!
Thanks man ! Glad you liked it
IMO a crew cab is always a must. versatility and resale value are just a couple of the benefits. I keep "safety equipment" in my glove box too. the 5.0L V8 is awesome. beautiful truck, great owner review!
Been thinking of trading in my 2016 Tacoma for one of these so many problems with my Tacoma
It's a reliable truck, we have had no issues
What sort of issues?
these new fords ate good but they have quite a few problems aswell, stick with your tacoma
SAME! Mt 16' Taco has had the following issues: trans slamming into gear from R to D, they reprogrammed it only to now cause it to slip while shifting 1-3. The brakes on the back literally froze up with fluid and all ok in traffic a few times. Front brakes are having some bad brake hop issues as well. The thing ran like a total TURD for a month. I had to cause a scene in the middle of the dealership to get them to check the oil level. They said look sir, the computer says its fine. I said take the plug off and LOOK. Sure enough was 2-3 quarts low. This is coming after me buying a 15' brand new which the head was cast wrong and it was just shit. Tacomas aren't what they were.
same issues, shitty shiftng, brake failure ,squeaky dash, bad window rollers, GARBAGE SERVCIE CENTER, IM DONE! should've kept my 2013 4.0
I have a 2015 F150 v8 crew cab and I love it. 8000 miles no problem at all so far. Nice video.
Arthur Ramalho how do you like it now?
@@nickhawes2523 I know I love my 15 Lariat 5.0. She has 98k on her, no issues yet!
@@americantrucknation4891 awesome! I actually bought a ‘16 XLT after posting that comment. I love it!
@@nickhawes2523 5.0?
@@americantrucknation4891 yep!
A crew cab with the 6.5 bed is definitely too long. They're already pushing it at 144" ish wheelbases in terms of getting in and out of certain places like parking structures or small city parking lots.
Thanks for posting this video! I am planning on trading in my 2009 Toyota Tacoma next week for a new 2016 F-150 with the Fx4 package. Taking the weekend to really think about it. I am in the market for a basic 4WD truck that would give me the long service life that a Tacoma offers. Ford has some irresistible end year incentives going on. Base XL trim and a 5.0V8 was a must. The salesman was trying to put me in higher trim Ecoboosts but I was not interested. I will take simplicity over expensive and unreliable tech any day.
I sold my 2010 super cab for a 2015 crew cab XLT sport and the extra room makes a big difference. My kids are almost out of smacking range LOL jk. All joking aside it was worth the extra money I think. There's more room on the floor in the back as well for additional hauling if no one is using rear seats.
I've had my big horn Hemi Ram three months ago I've really enjoyed it it's a 4wd I got a really good deal on it 13,000 off, you got a good looking truck great video
Thank you !
i bought a brand new 2015 f-150 xlt 2.7 ecoboost. it had a rattling sound coming from turbo and ford wont fix it for me. they told me to turn up my music so i cant hear it. and i am also a loyal ford employee
In late 2016 I bought a brand new 2015 left over crew cab 6.5ft box xlt truck. RWD only and I've been pretty happy with mine as well. Had to deal with some of those early recalls but otherwise happy. Drove it on the IKE gauntlet and boy did it do well.
nice video I'm going to be getting an f150 here within the next few months. I'm also leaning towards the 5.0 V8 over the ecoboost. I don't want the headaches of dealing with a turbo engine. I did a build & price on the XLT trim and I'm pretty sure that's available in the sport appearance package.
Thanks! You will love the truck !
Nice review, I needed two trucks for my company (tax write off reasons). We have always had a Ram Cummins diesel and a new gas Ram. Picked up two of the 15's on sale one decked out xlt 2.7 eco and 1 base xl 5.0 with sport package, 4x4, and tuxedo black (all super cabs). Regardless of me being the owner one of guys fell in love with the 2.7 xlt and claimed it (jacked it) without giving me a chance. Not that big of a deal because I had a new Ram with all the bells and whistles so I took the spartan what I thought was a pos 5.0 v8 I knew nothing about. Long story short I am averaging the exact same gas mileage 19mpg highway/city mixed as the 2.7 ecoboost. He runs premium for the turbos I run regular unleaded so I pay about 20% less on fuel. We are high up in the mountains of CO so I have driven in non stop serious snow and ice and its handled flawlessly.. On a highway trip the other day I averaged 23 mpg but mind you I have the lighter supercab and mine is geared for highway driving. The V8 always puts a smile on my face and I am glad I have the spartan truck simply because of the V8 now. Taking her for the first 1500 mile oil change tomorrow and switching it to mobile 1 full synthetic 5w 20. Oh and before I forget I sold the Dodges because this thing can tow almost 10k lbs which is more than we pickup. Walked out of the Subaru dealer with a new free and clear 2016 WRX because this base xl ford was all the truck I needed so the loaded gas Dodge went the way of the diesel and sold. Only complaint I have is Fords service center is a joke compared to Dodge and Ford never had the guts Dodge had in 2015 with the 100k mile power train warranty and Mopar sold me a unlimited time and mileage lifetime warranty for 2300. Ford wouldn't sell me anything close to what Mopar offers so lets hope these trucks are tough
+Andrew Smith Thanks for your comment, I'm glad you like the truck! I love the 2.7 Eco and 3.5L Eco but there is just something about that V8 that both Eco's do can't produce combined :) Nice that you ended up getting two new trucks and a new WRX ! You should start a channel lol ;)
Thanks so much for your information, because ,l am thinking to buy a use not too old dependable truck no too old and what you are saying it has been very helpful to me , thank you again. Take care and be safe .
Good choice with the 5.0
+jldude84 I would stay far away from a 2.7 in a 1/2 ton. Ford may be pushing the idea that its great but i'm very skeptical. Lack of displacement for hauling heavy loads makes me question the longevity of these motors.
+jldude84 I'm very skeptical of those posted mpg claims. They pretty much match exactly what It's possible for me to achieve measuring from fill up to fill up on calm, warm days in my 4200 pound standard cab, with 3.31 regular rear axle, and 2.7EB. However, my trip meter would likely indicate 1.5 mpg higher, and if I'm just cruising down the road and at a point and time, glance down at the trip meter, I could see a number even higher, but that is in no way a measure of fuel economy, but is what I suspect when I see someone claiming 5 mpg over the EPA estimate.
+FloppyBit The folks locked in to this idea that the V8 is some kind of magic engine refuse to learn the concepts of other technologies. The EBs are smaller displacement, but get boost from twin turbos. There is nothing wrong with having skepticism regarding the turbos themselves or worrying about a new engine versus an older, proven engine, such as the Coyote, but folks stating these EBs will wear out sooner due to higher revving or more compression do not understand the technology. The EBs perform nothing like base, naturally-aspired V6s that have traditionally been planted in full-size trucks. Ford's base V6 has peak torque coming way up over 4000 RPM, and it's something like 265. That's the kind of engine that will work harder to do heavy, truck- like work. Conversely, the 2.7 EB V6 achieves 375 at 3000 RPM, and the 3.5 achieves 420 at 2500. The Coyote V8 produces 387 at 3850. Moreover, the two EBs run at a lower compression ratio than either of Ford's NA engines. There is nothing in the character of either of these EBs that indicate they'd be over worked more than your beloved V8.
That's certainly more believable and amazing mpg for a full-size truck with a very capable V8. Ford has done well with this truck and all the engines, save the base V6. The difference between 23 and 25 is huge. It took truck makers 25 years to get 2 more mpg. At those figures, that's 8.6% . It's possible to squeeze out a couple more with the 2.7 EB, but only in the smaller, lighter versions and conservative driving, and so I'm thinking the 5.0 and 3.5 EB are better suited to the bigger trucks, 4WD, etc., as that smaller EB mpg diminishes up the line.
Mine averages 1.7 less than the computer, but the error is not consistent. The error is in the "gallons used" data. It's way under represented. Up to 1.6 gallons shy of actual fill up.
You willl see a big improvement in road grip and responsiveness if you upgrade those GY Wranglers. I went with a Falken tire that is actually more aggressive off road but grips better on road. The tire scrub in turns went away.
+Bruno TaTa Thank's for the info
NIce truck, I just moved up to an F250 though due to my towing needs. My old F150 did me well though. Looked almost new after 103,000 miles and no mechanical issues. Only thing that ever broke was one of the hangers in the rear passenger compartment. Hopefully my new truck serves me as well.
+davva360 Thanks man! Good luck with your new super duty !
I have a 2014 F150 xlt 5.0 with leather, 2014 was the only year they offered leather in an XLT, never seen another one, no dusty seats!
Were not allowed "safety equipment" in NJ 😔
Great video,I got a 2015 f150 platinum with the 5.0 in October and I love mine also.
+Vetteman6363 It's the best engine choice by far !
Another excellent video. I am looking at full sized trucks and the F150 is at the top of the list. This information has been very helpful. keep up the good work.
+James Washington Thanks ! Glad the video could be of help :)
the 2017 will get the 10 speed auto and a 3.0L diesel option. that would be the time to trade this one in.
+SteelCity1981 10-sp will only be for the Raptor, I think the Regular F150 will get it in 2018
xXBurntBaconXx all f150's are going to get it not just the raptor.
+SteelCity1981 Well, yes, if money is know object. The Ram ED starts at least $10K more than I can purchase a base-model Ram. The Colorado/Canyon--even worse. Starts at least $12K more than base, and its a 4 cylinder with cast-iron block and solenoid injectors. My guess is that if Ford does bring the Lion to the F150, aluminum body, more expensive transmission, engine more costly than even the ED that Ram sources VM (FCA is part owner of Italian engine maker), it will be extremely limited: to the Screw, and the highest trim levels; $42K minimum, as Ford will not likely be willing to lose margin on a dog idea.Diesel trucks in the light duty sector are absolutely valid, but only if and when they become more cost competitive with spark ignition at which point the manufacturers can match the right engines to the right configurations. Right now, we're getting what should be base diesel engines planted in only in the versions that need the most performance, and that's because a diesel worthy for heavy towing and hauling would cost even more to build and certify, and due to current emissions strategies limited by current technologies, would not significantly improve mpg employing V8s or larger sixes in half tons and below. And putting smaller sixes and fours in cheaper trims and configuration would cause too much sticker shock for the customer. So right now, its only about having the mpg crown and to pick up some extra margin from those who refuse spark plugs on their truck.
***** yeah and it will also last 500,000 miles. as for maintence the cost is cheaper and less frequent than gas is . i own a 2003 f250 diesel with 300,000 miles on it and it still runs great and i havent hardy had to do any engine maintence on it so idont know what you are talking about
+Steven Simpkins I'm not sure such a determination can be made simply on the basis of ignition type. While there are examples of 500K diesel engines in the past, particularly in the semi tractor industry from Cummins and Detroit before all this pollution reduction stuff had to go into high gear, in the light duty sector, where diesels must be much less costly to build, much lighter and many more horses per liter output, there have been some very good products and some not so good products; some can outlast an average spark ignition engine and some not. Look to Europe where diesels hold almost 50% market share. It depends on the design and quality control.As for oil changes, fuel costs, repair, there are alot of factors. If a diesel takes off-the-shelf oil like Rotella, and has extended changes around 15K like some do, and fuel prices stay right around the price of regular unleaded, then the equation works if one chooses an engine based on value or payback.It also depends on what trim level and configuration. As one goes up the price point, the diesel gets more affordable by comparison, because there is more and more margin to play with. But if one is in the market for a $30K truck, but only with a diesel and is expecting to pay an extra $4-$5K, that truck is not going to be available.The only segment where this small premium for a diesel can be found in a near base truck is in the commercial van segment. One can get a Transit with an I5 powerstroke or a ProRam ED for an extra $5K, but that means going from a $35K to a $40K van, and the only way to make a truck out of that is to order a cab chassis and then have a body built and installed. Those options will start you at $45K in a very basic vehicle.
Nice. Our neighbor just got a leftover 2015 XLT (302a) 4x4 crew cab/5.5 bed with a 3.5 Ecoboost in the Caribou brown color. Actually is a sharp color. Got a smokin deal being a leftover model. Threw a check engine light 2 miles off the lot, truck had 18 total miles on it....lol. Took it back in and they reset it, been fine ever since. They figure it was just from being moved around the lot for however long it was there and never really getting any driving besides a bunch of start ups and shut downs around the dealership.
I agree with you. Although the XLTs are nice if I were in the market for a new F150 I'd have to think about upgrading to the Lariat if I could swing the cost. Has a few gadgets like the auto 4x4 you mentioned that I'd be interested in.
One thing you might be able to answer. I notice that Ford offers a spray in bedliner as an option. Do that outsource that to Line-x or Rhino or is it their own?
+klc317 Nice for them! I like that Caribou color as well :)
When we have spray in liners done for customers (if the truck don't already have it) we outsource it and have a Rhino liner put in, there have been times where the truck has it already and I guess it's been Ford themselves putting it in then.
+klc317 I have the "spray in" bedliner. They shouldn't call it that. Each panel is sprayed separately then assembled. The bottom edge as well as around the wheel well is opened to the elements. I purchased flex black caulking and fixed it.
how much did he pay for that? if its a good deal. new?
mine is Oxford Black, 2015 F150, V8, Supercab, XLT. The same as yours. Yes the motor is awesome. mine is averaging 18.7 mph the last 10000 miles. Cruising 62mph it get 24mph. I love mine also. mine is a lot cleaner cause I don't have a 6 year old in the back seat.
Extended Cab with long bed for a slide in truck camper for me
I've had to get the cowl under the wipers replaced because of a bad gasket. And then the dealer burnt up the washer pump, so that's been replaced as well.
If you are looking for longevity and reliability, go for a NA engine like the 5.0L V8, I own a Turbo charged vehicle and they are great when new, but when you get up in miles the extra stress on the engine shows, as well as higher maintenance with turbo system and the mileage on mine sucks. My sister in law has a 2002 Ford Escape AWD 3.0L V6 with 360,000 miles on it, and it's only needed a new fuel pump and is still running good.
+ron mortensen Show me where the extra stress shows up. It's not in revolutions, as a DI, turbo will likely turn slower at any given output as NA. It's not in compression, as most are in the 10:1 range just like NAs. They do force more air (and in the case of spark ignition) more fuel through the delivery system, and they do have the turbo component that can go bad of it's a bad design or is abused, but my VW TDI ran like new at 165K and see no reason why it would not top 300K.There are good and bad examples of every engine type, but in general, as far as engine wear specifically endemic to the technology as a whole, there is nothing about DI, turbo charging that makes them wear faster.
+Gregory Faulkner The compression ratio, is basically the volumetric difference of the cylinder from the piston at the bottom of the stroke to the top. The turbo forces in more dense air, which results in a more powerful power stroke, which is where the extra stress comes from, that also creates more heat than a NA engine. A good design has a lot to do with durability, but overall most people agree that a NA engine will out last a FI engine. Read about Static and Dynamic compression ratios.
+ron mortensen Wikipedia confirms your definition but your missing something, because over at Ford's engine specs page, the two EBs are rated at 10.0:1, while the base V6 is rated at 10.8:1, and the Coyote is rated at 10.4:1, right opposite of the basis of your argument. Secondly, the peak torque and the RPM at which peak torque is achieved favors the EBs for long engine life, since they'll likely turn fewer revolutions over time than the NAs despite the smaller displacement. When each of the engines are called on for all available torque, the larger EB needs 2500 RPM, the 2.7 needs 3000, the 5.0 NA needs 3850, and the base V6 will sound like it's getting ready to melt down at 4250.Thirdly, even if it were true that the compression ratios were higher on these particular EBs versus these NAs, some of the most durable engines ever produced had as high as 22:1 compression ratios, and even today's modern diesels have over 16:1, yet short engine life is not a normal complaint from diesel owners.
+Gregory Faulkner It still depends if they are built for the extra boost, like a diesel, but diesels run at lower RPM's, and diesel fuel lubricates much better. The turbo's run hot, which is why they have lower compression ratio's, to avoid requiring high octane fuel. The NA's can run at higher compression ratio's without pre detonation, and yes their power comes on at higher RPM's, but at speed that much power isn't needed. But hey, I hope these new turbo engines last forever like you do, but I do think auto makers should keep a larger NA engine or two as options for people who want them.
I concede that the turbos themselves are a worry and a concern and only time will tell. If the design ends up being lacking in any way as part of the whole package, just like any modern engine, longevity will suffer and it'll be costly for the consumer. My point is just that we should not assume that any major technology applied to an ICE is inferior to tried and true technologies just because it is not as common and there should not be this ongoing assumption that a small-block V8 is the best that will ever come along. And we should keep in mind that, the manufacturers are likewise trying to get more with less out of these NAs as well and using other different strategies with them as well to keep power and improve mpg, as GM has learned with cylinder deactivation and the headaches that has caused some buyers with their NA V8s.
Good looking truck. You might consider a 1-2" leveling kit on front. A DIY job about 1 hour per side.
If 6,5ft of bed is too much for you and the supercab is too small to carry people around why don't you buy a Dodge Caravan ? It's just funny how people will spend almost $40k on a 4x4 XLT or even more on a Lariat, Platinum or King Ranch just to drive around with empty beds and no trailers at 17mpg. If you really NEED a truck, a basic XL will do just fine. And no you don't need 4x4 to drive on the highway (or even in the city for that matter) in snow, most people get by just fine with a Honda Civic.
Just an FYI on what is in my opinion the BIGGEST change from 15 to 16... Ford added reinforcement to this exact model (extended cab) in 2016. For some reason they put the reinforcement into all other body configurations except the extended cab for 2015. Long story longer this exact model received bad crash test ratings because of this.
+Billy Zach It is also the standard cab. 2015 saw only the Screw with the 5 star rating. 2016, Ford put them both on par with the Screw.
I have a '15 with the 2.7 and it drives great. Biggest complaint is the seats. Very uncomfortable. The lumbar is too aggressive even when completely deflated. makes longer drives very painful.
Also, I do with I waited until the 2016 to have the updated Sync system. And a different dealership so as to have gotten the LED headlights. But here's to hope for the 2017 Raptor and enough cash to get it.
Yes for sure it's not the truck it's the engine 5.0L is a good motor
Another outstanding video and probably the most important for me seeing the 150 is my next vehicle. So a couple of questions I hope you can help me with to make a decision. My mind is set on the limited model. However I see the raptor is coming out end of year. Is the raptor a WAY too aggressive model for everyday driving? I'm not taking it off road at all but I love the mean look to it. Additionally I really like the idea of the 10 speed transmission. I can wait for the 2017 raptor but if I do and it's too aggressive do I also wait on the limited until it packs the 10 speed transmission. Thanks in advance.
+adawg1203 Thank you ! To be honest, I dont know more about the Raptor then you do i'm sure, it is not out yet so I have not been able to put my hands on one and drive it. I know the older raptor did just fine as an everyday truck although it was horrible on gas because of the 6.2L. I would not mind to have the 10 speed transmission in our truck either :)
Excellent review! I may be picking up one -- a crew cab like you mentioned., i also am a fan of the V8,
👍🏻
Unfortunately the crash tests on the SuperCab are horrible compared to the previous generation. For safety reasons the Crew cab is the one people should be leaning towards.
+Gurmeet Singh Both configurations obtain a 'Good' rating on every IIHS crash test, minus the small overlap crash. The SuperCrew gets a 'Good' rating while the SuperCab does poorly, solely due to steel reinforcements in the chassis. Ford is already aware of this problem and they promised improvements in the 2016 model.
I think that it is a disgrace that Ford did not include all wheel drive with ALL 4 Wheel Drive equipped Trim Levels.
( Especially the XLT's )
in my 04 f150, the supercab just makes the front seat area smaller to allow bigger back seats. I'm glad i didnt get the 4 door. Same bed length though. Not sure about the new ones.
I get about 12 mpg in the city and 18-20 on the highway with the Supercrew 5.0.
+Vanilla Gorilla Yeah, pretty normal mileage from a 5.0, ive had better but your numbers are realistic
Night and day transformation wow
you regret not getting the crew cab. I got the crew cab and regret not getting the 4 wd lol
I got both haha
Dont need awd in rain, thats what traction control is for ....
17mpg mixed is probably 1 mpg better than prev gen 4x4.
I wonder if Crew Cabs will ever be considered standard.
good lookin truck... F150 is what im lookin to get at the end of this year... a 5.0 XLT or Lariat
You could have gotten a 6.5 ft bed in a crew cab. That's what I have. I wish I had the 302 package with the sport appearance package though . I have the 301 with chrome appearance package. And I wish I had the lariat too hindsight...
+rpaul247 I mention in the video that I don't want a crew cab with the 6.5 Ft bed.. just feel it's to long then and we don't need a 6.5 bed, I do want the crew cab though :)
+AutoVlog and it is lol. I do have trouble parking it sometimes.
rpaul247 ㄴㄴ
Question. These aren't exactly cheap. Why this vs say an Expedition Limited or maybe even sport? I note the bed hasn't been scratched and it isn't equipped for towing with a brake controller. (that I could see).
+Bruno TaTa We have utilized the bed many times but not for heavy duty stuff that really scratches up the bed badly, mainly it was wifey who was dead set on having a truck so we got it, she didn't want an SUV. For instance this past weekend we got to really use the bed of the truck when we first got a new bed and then also loaded it up with a LOT of stuff for our garden. It's true, we don't use the bed of the truck that often - but for those few times we REALLY need it is why she wanted a truck.
Yeah, I have a '12 FX4 I used in my business till this year. Solid reliable, never been to the shop once, and it's great to have the truck bed. But it just drives so big compared to a sedan, I'm thinking of something that handles and brakes better while still given some utility.. I meant Explorer sport, btw. The Edge sport in black is probably just what we need (no kids, 4 dogs) but they're mid $40's even with discounts, and that's getting close to Luxury brand price. I actually prefer the prev gen styling on the Edge, too.
I chuckled at the "safety equipment" in the locked glove box. *wink*
Those supercab crash tests make it look like a deathtrap... supercrew or go home IMO.
They improved them for 2016.
Cory R Good deal- I didn't know that
I own a 2016 F-150 XLT Supercrew with a 6.5' box and sport package. You won't find it too long to drive and yes you can get the premium sound system in the xlt. I have the system with the sub woofer.
I've only had the truck for a few weeks but have found something odd about it and had dealer examine it. When I shut off the truck or just come back and open a door the sound system is activated. Now I don't mean the radio is on but it is activated. You can hear the sub slightly on with a small amount of what sounds like voices. After about 4 minutes the sub goes boom and then everything shuts off till the door opens and it starts all over again. The dealer found it odd as well and sent a question into Ford. There has been no response/fix yet.
haunted
check your ground, make sure the ground is touching nothing but bare metal. that is the main problem causing the subs to do that.
Ya thats what I thought and mentioned it to the dealer. They instead sent in a question to Ford. I come from a car audio background.
Oh ok gotcha, maybe there is power still present in the ignition line, is that line hooked up to an ignition source that stays powered on after you turn the key off.
Not sure. Its really odd though that the interference comes on again if I just open any door without a key on me.
You should get the super duty with the extended cab and 8 foot bed
+Daniel Lockwood They are nice but way more truck then we need :)
+Daniel Lockwood Had one for work. You need at least 5 lanes to do a U-turn. ;)
That is a nice truck!
123 idle hours is a lot, no wonder you're only getting 17mpg
Thinking about buying used 15 or 16 soon. Is it easy maintenance as far as things like getting to the oil filter. I hate cars that are a pita to get to the oil filter.
Drivetrain reliability... now in 2019 for the 15’, 16’?
Very good
Gas mileage is definitely better on the Chevys. Average 20 in mixed driving on my 15' 5.3.
This is a 5.0 V8 model. My 2016 XLT F150 4x4 with the 2.7 Ecoboost gets almost 24 MPG
What oil are you running in your truck thanks. I just got a 2016 5.0 liter as well and love it
I run motorcraft
20:30 the issue he mentions is 100% operator error, but 'no one should use this feature'. Maybe just don't forget the other key. Aaaaah technology. PEBCAK error. lol
That's why I don't eat in my truck I have a 2013 fx 2 and it looks and smells like it did the day I bought it.
+cw300mag cool story bro!
why did you get the 5.0? the v6 has higher output than the 5.0. just curious
I like the V8 sound and it is powerful enough :)
Gotta say though, I'll give props to ford on this truck. You get pretty nice standard equipment with this truck, and not to mention they're able to fit 3 different engine options, a 2.7, 3.6, and 5.0. Never thought a v6 engine would have almost higher if not the same output as a v6!AutoVlog
I like toyota, but when it comes to trucks I like ram, but I never had real respect for ford's until now, and until I really looked into them. but ether way when it comes to trucks, I have developed a respect for all trucks. Ram, Chevy, Ford, and Toyota. To me It's just whatever you like and whatever floats you're boat. ☺
Just curious what are the ecoboost numbers on 87 octane? I feel like the V8 isn't a bad choice given the price difference in fuel.
Less to break with a naturally aspirating V8 Coyote platform. Twin turbo 2.7 & 3.5 requires Super Unleaded to achieve advertised MPG. All turbos with any real acceleration naturally zap fuel. So between typically getting lower than adverstised MPG and the extra premium for the fuel PLUS long term additional repair costs if you are to own the vehicle to 150k....V8 absolutely makes a ton of sense.
That's one dirty ass truck. Wow
How does the 2015 5.0 compare to the 2014 5.0? Is the gain in power and weight loss noticeable? Have you towed with your truck yet?
+Nick Weber The 15 feels stronger, it has a 25 horsepower increase and it's 700 lbs lighter because of the aluminum body. When driving you can feel that it is a lot lighter.. No, I have not towed with the truck yet.
+AutoVlog thanks, I'm leaning towards the 5.0 when the 10 speed comes out because of the engine's simplicity vs the ecoboost complexity. Lurking on forums I get concerned with reports of boost pressure leaks and exhaust leaks. Perhaps my concern is unfounded, but I would hate to dump my old 7.3 (that I've already fixed all the leaks) and jump into a maintenance intense vehicle.
Maestro Limpio
Sorry couldn't make it all the way through the video. The cleaning of the truck really took me out of it.
hey man you live in Bridgeville /Heidelberg pa.
Why an fx4 package if from the sounds of things it doesn't do any off roading?
+Josh Leviton (Outlaw Patriot) It was on the truck when we bought it, don't mind that it's there.
how did you remove the head cover from the front middle seat? I have the same truck except its a sport package with a full back seat but cant figure out how to remove the head cover on the front seat
+None I think that's from the middle rear seat,,, that's where I keep mine, on the floor next to the rear passenger side head rest. There is a big enough blind spot without them so I only put them in if I have passengers back there. To remove them pull it all of the way up, then there is a little "slide" that needs to be depressed to unlatch it and it should pull right out. It's in the owners manual. At least it is in mine.
thanks bro
Do you ever notice a shudder when taking off from a stop or accelerating from lets say 30mph?
+D. Mike No I cant say I have Mike
I have that problem in my 2012 platinum screw. It's either the drives have splines need lube or the rear shocks are binding when they extend (stop) or collapse (take off from a stop). If you google it you'll find this affects lots of years and trim levels of f150
+Fireship1 I meant to say driveshaft splines. Damn autocorrect!
Dont step up to a Lariat just for a stereo system bro just get a XLT supercrew cab 5 1/2 FX4 5.0 V8 with a custom sound system. Itll probably sound much better than factory options and be cheaper with the fam an all. appearance package if you want
Only reason y I would go to the lariat is the leather seats
If u got the money an want it, me i love cars so i could never keep mine factory
+itsbasil1126 I want a platinum those are nice
Same here platinum in black
+itsbasil1126 exactly the color I get
I just got a 2016 F150 with the 2.7L Eco on June 8th and man am I having regrets on not that getting the V8. I'm 22 and this is my first truck since I upgraded from my 99 mustang gt. Do you think I can take it back and pick out another one like a different color and with the V8? As in like will my down payment be able to transfer? Just asking because I really don't know.
+Hemi Power I went to the dealer last week and drove the 5.0 V8 and I definitely like the ecoboost better now that I know how they both feel..my Eco is a little rocket and picks up so quick compared to the 5.0
always best to test drive them all, and take a couple days to think about what you really want, made the same mistake too, but miss the v8 sound, but the turbos are cool too...
Hemi Power huh? I got the 2.7L Eco..thing is okay on gas and it picks up pretty damn good imo. Only regret getting the ecoboost because I keep thinking the V8 would of been the better choice in reliability 10 years down the road or so
17k in 9 months, around 70 miles a day. That's a lot.
what is the gear ratio in that truck , is it 3;73 locker or 3: 55 ratio with electric locker
3:55
No locker, limited slip only
@@Slammintone he says in video it has locking diff
I like my 2.7 ecoboost.
+lily payan What year and how many miles are on it?
Me too! I got the 2015 2.7 ecoboost and I've put over 14000 miles on it and it's been perfect! No problems what so ever!!
+Jackle61 about 5k pulled a 6 k trailer like butter the only thing I don't like is the stupid door bell lol
Mike always does great reviews, just bought a 2017 XL STX 2.7 4WD Crew, love the truck, compared to ole Tacoma, comfort, plenty of power and great economy! Little worried about the turbos long term durability, but hopefully Ford knows best. Can't say I like the look better than the RAM, but compared to the HEMI economy is much much better. Mikes reviews helped me make my mind up, keep them reviews coming Mike!
Maybe clean out your truck before you make the video.
Thanks for the video. So this is a 4x4 correct? So I guess 17MPG is on the highway? Thanks.
Yes it's 4X4, we get better then 17mpg on highway.
AutoVlog I get about 18MPG on my 2003 Trailblazer (it's also a 4x4). I would have thought that 4x4 vehicles would have been little bit more fuel efficient in 2015-16.
Think you can do an 18 month review now?
xXBurntBaconXx Good suggestion. Yes please.
is that the 4.2L straight 6? this is a V8 with 385hp
No the Ecoboost not 5.0L
you seem to always review during the rain lol
+UnlimitedProduction1 I live in Pittsburgh ;)
AutoVlog It must rain there like it does here in Houston lol
UnlimitedProduction1 It does !
women messing around and messing up the electronics lol. she thought 80mph was plenty even though the truck only does like 105mph max speed. you need that extra speed in case of emergency and the radio set at half? um why? radio in the F150 isn't that loud to begin with, obviously cause dude bitched the stereo could only go half way up. On my high power stereo system in my car, half way would be ear drum ringing loud. nobody messes with my car or my setting , but me. It's my car hands off BIATCH lol
compared to the 4.6v8 3v how is it reliability wise?
I've never had an issue, this truck has not skipped a beat while we have had it !
so long trips(1000 miles plus) arent a problem? whats your mpg like on trips?
18.5 mpg doing 85 MPH, I have a separate video where we do a trip to Florida and I measured it
ruclips.net/video/o5p6uWQkddE/видео.html
My computer overestimates mileage by 1mpg
not much room in the back seat area
david stanley you can get a supercab
02 ram I have has same specs but cost 19000 new
I borrowed a friends 2012 f150 a few weeks back and i could feel the truck twisting and wobbling over every bump and well as the side of the cab shaking when closing the doors. Do the new fords still feel like that?
Funny thing opinions are like assholes everyone has one and if the shoe fits wear it!!!
So pretty much the first 3 minutes and 25 seconds is nothing more than terrible music and pointless.
No one's making you watch it :)
9mm safety gear i bet ;-)
supercab looks better
I don't get why people buy crew cabs with two foot beds. Reminds me of lesbians driving around in Subaru Bajas. Why not just admit you don't need a truck and get a sissy ass SUV?
Hmm I dunno.. maybe because they have a family to carry around and there's more room in a supercrew? How silly that you assume a 1 foot shorter bed means you don't need a truck. Newsflash: most people driving trucks don't NEED a truck. 90% of people driving 4x4's don't need those either. This is America and here people buy what they want - not what they need. Get over it.
moohuhahaaa Want vs need. Purpose-built vehicles vs Frankenstein monstrosities borne from a marketing executive's view of "what people want but don't know they want yet" idealisms. It's a compromise vehicle that makes no one happy. Like the Chevy Avalanche or the Pontiac Aztek -- two of the ugliest "compromise" vehicles ever made. This guy, if he could get over his own "truck addiction", really should be looking at a Ford Transit Van or a Ford Expedition, depending on his needs. A pickup truck with a 5.5' bed is stupid. It's not a truck anymore. It's a compromise vehicle that makes no one happy. That's my opinion which is different than yours -- something that happens in a democratic society. You get over it.
Zmoto, while I won't argue that the Pontiac Aztek and Chevy Avalanche are ugly, to suggest they "make no one happy" is a poor assessment. The Chevy Avalanche sold 625,206 vehicles over 13 years, and the Pontiac Aztek sold 119,662 over 8 years. Clearly, they made someone happy, albeit someone we wouldn't associate with. Nonetheless, they make bed extenders for a reason. I'm sure if this guy wanted a van or SUV, he'd purchase one. It seems to me he wants a truck, and like millions of other people, the short bed suits him just fine.
Oh.. and technically we live in a republic ("..and to the republic, for which it stands..."), not a democracy. Our founding fathers criticized pure democracy. Just sayin'.
But it doesn't crash better..
lol I stopped watching and laughed when you said you couldnt cruise at 90mph. :)
+Saki630 Did you even watch the video? He wasn't able to cruise above that speed because his wife played with the settings and accidentally restricted the speed of the truck.
+WuWei Xu I watched it and laughed. I wonder if his tires can even go 90mph.