I own the A1 x2 but to have long operating times I have added a dual battery grip to each which cost , at list price with second battery an additional $465 so that places the A1 II at $6974. That still $675 mor than Canon’s EOS R1. I guess the additional cost is related to increased resolution sensor? Thank you and take care.
Not a bad point even though I haven't had that experience. And I guess you're right about the resolution because not only does it allow for more crop ability in stills, it allows for 8K in video which the Canon doesn't offer. Nonetheless, both cameras are great at what they do. Thanks for your input.
The decision to use the same CPU in this new camera is highly disappointing and feels like a disservice to A1 customers. This upgrade does not justify the $3,000 price tag, as it offers no significant improvements in video codecs or write speeds. The current CPU overheats too quickly, causing bottlenecks that prevent 8K60 video recording and the CF-A Gen 4 write speeds required for 4K240. Personally, I have never had issues with the autofocus of my A1 since day one. My primary frustration has been Sony’s continued emphasis on firmware support for models like the a7C and A7IV, while neglecting their flagship devices. This approach is something I would not expect from competitors like Canon or Nikon, who prioritize their flagship models over entry-level ones. As a dedicated Sony Professional and A1 owner since its launch, I am disheartened by the direction the company seems to be heading. I predict that Sony will introduce a new CPU in the a7V next year, along with extensive firmware updates that they will refuse to implement in the A1ii. Sony will likely claim the A1ii’s older chip can’t handle the improvements, citing the a7V's more efficient and less heat-prone CPU, which will support higher video codecs for B-roll and 8K footage-yet again, leaving their loyal A1 users behind.
I have to disagree with you just a bit. The A1 II does NOT have the same processor, which now allows for the AI improvements. It had the same sensor. I have the A1 II and I can tell you for certain the improvements are significant. The varied angle screen, the switch from stills to video mode, the auto-focus OPTIONS and ability all together make this version an even better joy. Yeah that $6500 price is hard to swallow so I understand when people are weary to upgrade. Thanks for your input.
@@double00imageryit has the exact same processor as the original A1. The AI Chip is a separate thing. I don’t want a flappy screen, I don’t want a fat Canonesque grip. It doesn’t matter how hard you shill this device…I know the spec sheet, I know the internals, it’s a joke and there is nothing you can say to change that. No CF-A 4th Gen no higher end codecs, no improved color science. It’s the exact same camera with a firmware update and Pre-Capture, along with a crappy screen and a crappy grip. They did the absolute minimum to improve this camera…pathetic
then buy a video camera. The A1II is a high resolution, high speed photo camera (with video capabilities). My camera does not have a button that dispenses coffee, so, I got a coffee machine...
Let’s grow your channel you go boy
Good insights my man! Much appreciated.
Thx a lot
I own the A1 x2 but to have long operating times I have added a dual battery grip to each which cost , at list price with second battery an additional $465 so that places the A1 II at $6974. That still $675 mor than Canon’s EOS R1. I guess the additional cost is related to increased resolution sensor? Thank you and take care.
Not a bad point even though I haven't had that experience. And I guess you're right about the resolution because not only does it allow for more crop ability in stills, it allows for 8K in video which the Canon doesn't offer. Nonetheless, both cameras are great at what they do. Thanks for your input.
The decision to use the same CPU in this new camera is highly disappointing and feels like a disservice to A1 customers. This upgrade does not justify the $3,000 price tag, as it offers no significant improvements in video codecs or write speeds. The current CPU overheats too quickly, causing bottlenecks that prevent 8K60 video recording and the CF-A Gen 4 write speeds required for 4K240.
Personally, I have never had issues with the autofocus of my A1 since day one. My primary frustration has been Sony’s continued emphasis on firmware support for models like the a7C and A7IV, while neglecting their flagship devices. This approach is something I would not expect from competitors like Canon or Nikon, who prioritize their flagship models over entry-level ones.
As a dedicated Sony Professional and A1 owner since its launch, I am disheartened by the direction the company seems to be heading. I predict that Sony will introduce a new CPU in the a7V next year, along with extensive firmware updates that they will refuse to implement in the A1ii. Sony will likely claim the A1ii’s older chip can’t handle the improvements, citing the a7V's more efficient and less heat-prone CPU, which will support higher video codecs for B-roll and 8K footage-yet again, leaving their loyal A1 users behind.
I have to disagree with you just a bit. The A1 II does NOT have the same processor, which now allows for the AI improvements. It had the same sensor. I have the A1 II and I can tell you for certain the improvements are significant. The varied angle screen, the switch from stills to video mode, the auto-focus OPTIONS and ability all together make this version an even better joy.
Yeah that $6500 price is hard to swallow so I understand when people are weary to upgrade.
Thanks for your input.
@@double00imageryit has the exact same processor as the original A1. The AI Chip is a separate thing. I don’t want a flappy screen, I don’t want a fat Canonesque grip. It doesn’t matter how hard you shill this device…I know the spec sheet, I know the internals, it’s a joke and there is nothing you can say to change that. No CF-A 4th Gen no higher end codecs, no improved color science. It’s the exact same camera with a firmware update and Pre-Capture, along with a crappy screen and a crappy grip. They did the absolute minimum to improve this camera…pathetic
The Sony A1 Mark 2 doesn't have 8K 60 or 120fps.....
then buy a video camera. The A1II is a high resolution, high speed photo camera (with video capabilities). My camera does not have a button that dispenses coffee, so, I got a coffee machine...