Shooting 400MP Photos on the $10,000 GFX100 (Fujifilm GFX100 Pixel Shift)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- The first 1000 people to use the link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: skl.sh/zyprodu...
The GFX100 was insane for doing 100MP...but now it also does 400MP!
Watch Jayz’s 400MP video here on the @lenslibrary channel:
• Do You Need 400 Megapi...
Download 400MP JPEGs here:
drive.google.c...
___________________________________________________
Gear I use to film my RUclips videos:
kit.co/zyprodu...
Support me on Patreon!
/ zyproductions Subscribe to Adobe Creative Cloud:
clk.tradedoubl...)
Where I get my music from:
artlist.io/art...
"Takes a 400MP shot"
"Posts it on Instagram"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Peter lik does this all the time I'm sure
Imagine the storage requirements if they’re didn’t put caps on data size
@@minuteman259 I have a Insta mod that removes those Caps.
@@fa14bi-78 no you don't lmfao the limit isn't client-side so that's not anywhere near how that works
The megapixel count isn’t even the most shocking thing, the fact that the lens is so ridiculously sharp to that level of magnification is insane.
Not exactly. Pixel shifting doesn't increase lens resolving power, it takes multiple shots with the sensor shifted. So if this was a 400mp camera rather than a 100mp one, the results would be worse. It's all semantics though, because with any camera you can get this level of detail, it just takes more work and stitching shots.
Agreed bro.
lens generates a flow of light. it can't be sharp or not sharp. any lens that is focused on something gives a light. the main work is to absorb the most of this flow of light in a small amount of time on a surface. thats where MP counts. so its fully the work of matrix
It essentially halves the pixel pitch from 3.7 to 1.8.. you need 190lp/mm to utilize 1.8micron pixels. Its pretty much the best that current optics can possibly do. The largest noticeable effect comes from having full RGB info. In bayer sensors the megapixel ratings are misleading, a 100mp bayer sensor is only 33mp sensor in color (rest is interpolated). One pixel is actually 4 pixels on the sensor. So the bayer sensor basically has 7.4micron pixels. Pixels that big only can utilize around 50lp/mm resolving power from the lens.
It does not go exactly like this, as bayers are asymmetric.. having twice as many green pixels as blue & red pixels.
@@ilyasnamozov2914 eat less acid :) its exactly the lens that can be sharp. MP only defines the image size. Its about the pixel pitch & lens resolution.
this camera combined with a macro lens lets you see bacteriums
Tesco Virus
If you make a deal with the bacteria to sit perfectly still
Omggggggggggggggggggggg
@@esbensteen5412 agree 🤣
with the mark ii you can take pics of stuff that are in subatomic sizes.
I can't wait for 20 years from now when I can buy this for $1k and take pictures of my bookshelves
second this
Let's hope for 5 years! I want to be alive when this gets down to 1K. Remember: we also need a lens ...
LOL
its now 2024 and they are going for 3kish on the used market lol
It’s 3k now
Me watching on 720p shitphone : hmm yeah, very noticeable...
I can supposively shoot 8k on my phone but can only view upto 2k resolution. Makes no sence to me so I just do 4k and watch yt at 1440p
Me! 😂
@@ItsPinecone_911 shitphone. I like it
@@tfr lol
@@ItsPinecone_911 liar what kinda phone shoots 8k
As a professional dust photographer I'm really taking this camera into consideration after seeing this marvelous review
-Fuji APSC: Hey baby, am I enough for you 😕
-The girlfriend: Yeah sure baby, don't worry about that.
-The GFX in her dm's: 😏
Hasselblad H6D in her tinder: 😈
YOU DONT GET TO GET PERSONAL :
Dude! I pity your computer for the editing part 😂
You should’ve heard the fans on that thing, sounded like a jet!
@@zy_cheng what are you using for editing? program and machine? I use a S1H and a canon eos r5 and Premiere and 32 core threadripper
agree....two weeks for one picture edition...
He uses a Mac, not a real computer
now we have an apple silicon chip 🤪
Macro lens would've been insane. Wish you had on3
Images produced by this camera are so sharp they will cut you eyeballs in half
My contact lens went slightly painful while looking at the 400MP files. I'm putting it down to sharpness.
So cool, really happy you liked my Skillshare course, thank you so much for promoting! 😍
Thanks for dropping by Amelie! And your course is really awesome!
My A7R4 does 244 MP shots. The details are mind boggling, just like this.
does it also do pixel shift ?
@@marknorris3769 - Yes. But you need Capture 20 software to align and merge the multiple files into a single file.
@@mattsnider5704 Imaging Edge should do it as well, right?
@richardhalo - No. Got it on sale. Capture One was $120.
@@Dr.LaserBeam - I don’t know if Imaging Edge allows for that. I think it is only available in Capture One.
Me: finally buys a GFX 100.
*Uses it to look at dust on the various things in my room*
🤣🤣🤣
If you ever slightly have OCD that's triggering. I prolly wont stop cleaning....
this camera:- 407 MP
human eye at 576 MP:- this shit is getting close real fast
Now imagine Fuji introduces a 1:1 reproduction ratio macro lens, and then use that with the pixel shift function to digitize a 6x6 film negative by stitching parts of the photographed negative together......
that would be insaaaane. maybe you could even see the individual light sensitive corns in some high iso films like on a delta 3200 🤤🤤🤤
@@samsonkipp probably so! I use Nikon D800 to digitize film negatives, and the results are already mind blowing. I could get ~56MP for each frame after stitching.
This would be my dream lens and camera combo if this happened.
iXG with 100/150 Mpx's, 1×120mm Scheider-Kreutznach and 3-4 extensions are just enough for 6×6 w/o stitching 🤤
BTW ROI is significant in such cases, Fuji/Sony etc does not guarantee a sufficiently long mechanical shutter life (when I mean sufficiently >2-10 mio shots)
@@miroslavkhodl2665 it's all for the sake of having a 1GB scan file ;)
The technology is impressive... It also shows just how good GF lenses are.
Hello, i know its been 3 years since this video was released, but i tried downloading the .jpg's from the video description, and converted them to .jxl's (JPEG XL), with "save quality" set to 70 and "Speed effort" set to 5, and got the image down to 2.69 MB... which is insane for 407 MP image... i could still zoom in and see the incredible detail...
*If you put on a macro lens, you will see individual molecules!*
1x reproduction would mean a maximum resolving power of around 1 micron. You can see actual bacteria with this resolving power.
What sold me most was the clarity of the dust. Now I need this camera.
The camera is dumb af
I think a real world application would this would be to try and capture the beauty of old paintings etc. Being able to capture and reserve this much detail in a digital file is amazing. Normal everyday shooting, not really but that's not the purpose of this. Really cool to see.
i need to tell myself: I dont need this, my fuji APSC is just fine
At work we have a phase one 100mp and a new fuji gfx 100 since a few days ago now and I work on 100mp files on a daily basis. I wouldn´t trade my private fuji apsc cameras and lenses for systems like that, because my fuji x-t3 actually IS JUST FINE in the best way.
Like Yoda said:
With higher resolution comes great responsibility. ;)
@@ThisIsWideAngle I would LOVE the GFX especially since it shoots 4k 30p as well AND has IBIS. But for the work I do the XT3 is such a workhorse and I love it and will keep mind for quite some time.
and a large format view camera with portra 400....
one day the cameras will have better quality than our eyes
They already do.
@@micahroberts4481 i mean the megapixels of our eyes is 576 Megapixels
@@virt-manager
Only after you've reconstructed all your fov by looking at everything ?
@@virt-manager they kinda already are. Our eyes have a realy bad image quality they're mostly black and white, have blood vessels all over the matrix and very poor quality lenses. But we have the best NPU in the world to compensate for that and make the perfect image we see
I am beyond amped to get this camera. The fact that made this a feature and it's something I already do manually is going to save so much time and make for an overall better image. Appreciate the video demo!
"If you don't shoot at 400mp then you can't see the details in the bits of dust."
I think I can live without!
Jesus this is the first photography video in a long time I’ve enjoyed
I don't usually comment, but damn that detail is insane boi
Superman: I see your sensor moving.
Photographer: what??
Happy to see this video online.
I purchased GFX 100 last year. Although i expected a 4K 60 Fps update since its advertised strongly as a Video camera as well it seems its not happening. Nevertheless its an amazing piece of technology. Do you believe that Apple DOES NOT SUPPORT GFX100 raw files yet.? The dual batteries are somehow not as good as the Sony Zs so I strongly advise at least 3 pairs for a days work. The camera and lenses are surprisingly light compared to their volume plus weather resistant. If you want to take this camera on a trip then make space for a medium to large backpack to accommodate enough padding for protection.
What’s even more impressive than the camera is how sharp that lens is
Watching these videos on big ipad screen is wonderful
since we cant see the pixels move with our eyes.. how about to take a pixel shift image of the sensor of another camera performing pixel shift .. them maybe we can tell the movement if you stitch it all together in a video with 500% zoom or something like that
0.02% you mean? 🌚
Yes
The HomePod was so satisfying
I downloaded a few images in 400mp resolution which were online in december and now yours. All of them have tiny, but noticable pixel artefacts in structures and contrast-lines. I wonder if this is noticeable if the resolution is downscaled and how much improvement in sharpness there still is because of the higher resolution of the, but the 400 mp file isn´t as clear as the 100mp resolution image and not quite usable in full resolution.
We have the fuji gfx 100 at work since last week but I didn´t have the time to test the pixelshift option myself.
I have the same issue with mine and I thought it was user error. To be fair I have to pixel peep at insane zoom levels to notice them, so unless you are goint to print a 10m print you might not notice it. I tried to combined two pixel shift images with one taken slightly offset and at an angle before averaging them in photoshop. It cleans it up but only works if you are photographing a perfectly flat subject. Otherwise you introduce perspective/parallax issues
An excellent method I had no knowledge of previously ❤
I wonder with a macro lens, and shoot a CMOS sensor of another camera, is it possible to reveal the pixel of that CMOS sensor?
Probably not really, you will hit the lens resolution limit and diffraction limit. I do macros and usually I push macro lenses over their limits by using macro rings. Beyond a point I don't get any more details.
A macro lens won't capture such detail, regardless of the shooting camera. That level of detail requires a microscope with lab-grade microscope objective lenses. As an engineer working in a nanotechnology company, I produced such micro images that revealed fairly distinct detail at about 1/3 micron (>350 nanometers), beyond which diffraction was a hard limit of visible light. For reference, a single pixel in a Canon EOS R5 is about 4 microns wide; so, a good microscope would achieve a slightly blurry, but legibly detailed image of a pixel.
you know I was thinking about a something like pixel shifting in the past where the camera would focus higher then a sub pixel and then shift which is kinda what this camera does
I think I got the idea from CRT monitors since they are just one pixel wizzing around the screen to get an image
how long does a 16 shot sequence take? how many seconds? would be interesting to team up with someone who has a nice stable telescope to try some single shot (well 16 shot) astrophotography to see just what is possible with such a creature!
What a bonkers camera. Nice video.
Definitely suited to digital preservation or forensic detail.
CAn you use a macro lens and see if you can see cells and bacteria on stuff?
I'm surprised that Fuji and Sony actually state the full RGB resolution for this rather than greyscale like tye standard resolution. For example the Sony A7R4 takes 16x 61mp to use 976mp from the beyer sensor. Since it is combining each 4 images into a true 61mp RGB 4 times on a computer and then multiplying that by 4 it ends up as 244, in the same way this Fuji is doing 407mp. That's pretty impressive. Finding lenses to resolve that detail whilst requiring a completely still subject and an extremely sturdy tripod is the challenge tho.
I've been using the GFX100 for landscape and art reproduction (with the GF120 Macro) for a couple of years now. Absolutely amazing camera, but I must say that the pixelshift feature was a letdown for me. Even though I'm shooting art in studio using a heavy industrial stand rather than a tripod, the combined image always carried some artifacts. Perhaps it's time for me to revisit Fujifilm's combiner to see if there have been any recent updates. That said, the standard file is near on 1m @300ppi natively and it interpolates beautifully. This allows for print sizes well beyond the maximum width of our Canon printers (1.4m), so there is not much to be gained for the "naked eye" viewing of the printed result anyway..... especially when I capture the larger or odd-shaped artworks (that don't maximise use of the sensor in a single frame) on the rolling wall and stitch anyway.
Sometimes higher resolution isn't the answer for everything. It's perfect for digitizing paintings but sometimes lower resolution but much higher image quality per pixel is much more important at getting an amazing image. That's basically how ari cinema cameras work. The old ones might not be able to shoot at 8K but the 1080p footage that comes out of these sensors is just amazing and very realistic.
Do you use a separate digital view finder with this camera? If so which ??
hav you tried digitizing negatives with that? I think itll be so interesting to see the individual grains
Thank you for always providing entertaining and informational content! Keep up the amazing work!
I bet it would be awesome for astrophotography, like you can have a milky way landscape and a planetary nebula in one shot
Ok, simple question. what is diffraction limit on this optics ? megapixels are pointless unless it has other data than neighbor pixel
Can you do macro with this camera? Still object is okay, but if you can do it with some animal, it will be more statisfied
That is the best segway to the sponsored message ever!
Question: can you compare this against the IQ4 150MP OR 100MP
finally... the perfect digital film home scanner setup
I'm equally amazed by the quality of the lense that allows to utilize this crazy resolution
Wow epic camera ,cepic video budy !
I would use it for astrophotography , moonphotography .
Althought the earth moves to...hmm ?
Grtz
The movement might already be too much. Even 100mp are already pretty damn sensible.
Wasn´t there a hardware solution which compensates earth rotation?
also the optics you have on it is amazing
So does it mean this is not for long exposures of astrophoto?
its surprising that the pixel pitch isnt too bad even tho it has such a high resolution. Imagine adding a peltier to the sensor and using it for astrophotography
To me it's mind bogling how fuji avoids a full frame sensor but then makes this
IMHO because people would stop buying their APSC cameras and lenses. The whole line up would lose value.
@@kikodotfilip that's likely it :( I hope to see a fullframe fuji in future
@@INSTINCT777 For what? There are way too many full frame camera makers on the market already. And the gain of FF is just not worth it, imo. Atleast not in the mirrorless line. Lenses get a lot bigger, heavier and more expensive on FF, which kinda neglects the whole idea of mirrorless in the first place. Just my 2cents tho.
My mind exploded when I tried to imagine a micro lens on a 400 megapixel camera.
9:36 Looking at the hard edge on the diagonal boundary between black & white on the right image, distinct pixelation is obvious. Maybe the algorithm for pixel-shifting needs some tweaking to smooth the diagonal details!
An alternative approach for higher resolution: take multiple macro shots, and stitch them together. *Much* cheaper!
the left image is blown up using nearest neighbour filter. that is why it seems softer. the resolution seemd to be there. i think pixelation is the same acriss the right image.
Do all those pixels result in higher noise levels at full resolution?
Tank you, now i can see atoms using this camera
I set my phone from 144p to 1080p just to watch this video lol. Fantastic work 👏
There is a program called Image Composite Editor by Microsoft, if u wanna mess around whit huge pictures just grab a 200mm zoom take 30 pictures of something, and stitch tame together hit this software! Ist really fun creating pictures whit resucuciones in the range of Gigapixels !
i wonder if smartphones can do this but electronically. like a shifting but on the pixels, by taking multiple shots or something like that.
Your English is fabulous!
incredible for museums.
interesting to see the limits of the lens' resolving power. For a higher resolution image you need a better lens as well, not just more pixels. All of the examples suffered from CA, which is not very noticable at 100 megapixels, but obvious at 400. The lens is probably phenomenal if it resolves nicely on a 100 mpx "medium format" sensor, but it was not created with pixel shift in mind
Man, I would love to see this with a macro lens!
Thank you Mr Fruity-Voice, that was amazing; seriously. Fanks🐶
How will this work with astro photography?
Can you use same algorithm on any camera with stabilization?
7:16 its an angel dancing on the head of a pin
Would love to see an actual use case for this... product photos for a billboard campaign? Massive gallery style prints?
Looks great on 480p
This Camera with a Macro lens would be a God send for Motherboards scans and close ups of Electronics internals.
I remember olympus e5m2 shocked me with its pixel shift resolution, but this 10 times that :D
This would be cool for studio macro since more cropping latitude would let you shoot further away with more depth of focus.
Could just use an M4/3 camera at that point, as you're only using a small middle part of the sensor.
@@logitech4873 True, though if you switch to non-macro photography the extra dynamic range is nice.
"That would be around 3GB per shot"
Filmmakers: Only 3GB per shot? What a steal!
Was always wondering if the opposite of pixel binning was possible. Now we just need an app for that.
Many flagship android smartphones do pixel binning. The crazy Megapixel numbers the advertise are binned to a resolution that is more in line with the optical quality of the lenses by default. Shooting RAW binned images is not so useful since the Bayer filter makes binning non-trivial. On monochrome cameras it can be done, we have a monochrome camera at work that we often use with pixel binning.
love that apple pod shot, great video
I really would like to see you use the pixel shift for making a HDRi for lighting 3D scenes.
Can I use it for my daily vlogs ?
Why not ...you would be unique in that doing .. lol
Can it record video ?
Grtz
@@Metaldetectiontubeworldwide it can record video at 4k and is the first medium format to do so.
@@wanhl2440 thanks alot budy !
meaning it crops in on the sensor ?
uses full sensor readout and thus been able to give an upscaled 4K?
that would blow my hat of and mayby , sell my kidneys ...both lol .
no maybe ..its such an epic camera , can only imagine it gonna go up in price rather than going down ..
greets johny geerts
definitely gotta try a macro lens on this body!
If we slap on a macro lens and pixel shift that baby we can watch horton hears a who in real time
have you noticed the flaw present in the shot @ 9:33 1 of the 4 pixels generated is offset by about 5, meaning the shift when shot was not accurate. sure theres more detail but when 25% of all edges looks like hot garbage it should be deleted. As yet i have not seen a 400mp image that does not have this flaw (and i have access to a gfx100)
Seems pretty impressive, but 16 shots in pixel shift? I think the Sony 60mp A7r4 does an 8 image pixel shift which is equally difficult to shoot and process as this GFX100. Pentax did pixel shift about 4 years ago, but now they do HAND HELD pixel shift in apsc and full frame cameras with a 4 shot in camera processed pixel shift image. Pentax pioneered the tech which is why theirs works better and hand held. Pentax have the patent on the 4 shot pixel shift, Sony has the patent on the 8 shot pixel shift and lucky last Fuji has the 16 shot pixel shift patent. Plus Pentax has the patent on Astrotracer to track stars in astro photography, meanwhile Canon and Nikon beatup on sensor stabilization for 15-18 years, and came late to the sensor stabilization EXTRA BAG OF TRICKS. I expect Pentax Medium format camera will get Shake Reduction and pixel shift, and perhaps later a true full frame medium format sensor to go with their full frame medium format lenses. Fuji GF are all crop medium format lenses. The other medium format digital dslr Mamiya, Phase one, Hasselblad are also full frame systems too. Thats the down side with these medium format crop systems and crop lenses.
The original idea for the Pentax pixel shift was to create TRUE COLOR rendition like a Foveon sensor, using the Bayer array to capture the true color rather than the imaging engine interpolate the information and essentially GUESS the colors in the image.
Brenizer Method also implement something close to this except it is done with a tripod. I was thinking if you could do a video on it with a moderate telephoto lens like a 100mm macro.
The best thing is watching this compressed video at 240p
You need a macro lens for the ultimate 400mp test 🙌
Why not this function not available on Fuji apsc ?
When you zoomed in on the homepod 😲
Bits of dust chilling :D
Photographers: my goodness! This camera is a beast!
Non photographers: psh. My galaxy s21 is 108MP. This camera isn’t anything special.
I’ve run into that person before. Quite hilarious.
Outstanding presentation 👍😎♥️
How does the screen or printer display images with data smaller than a pixel?
Ive been shooting LF and MF film for awhile now and this resolution doesn't really caught my attention. I've used drum scanners that resolve to 3200ppi and I've scan 4x5 negs and slides at that resolution. Which gives you like 250 mp more or less.
Any professional models that can stay super still to be ‘digitised’?
I don't think even big companies use this quality for product photos. What is this actually used for? like, product photography for billboards? or maybe automotive companies?