Now I was wondering if this is true. When shooting pictures of my children I can imagine that a faster (tracking/eye) AF will be a plus. My children (and probably anyone's children) never sit still so it is always a hassle to get them in focus. I'm using a Nex-6, so that is even one generation older than the A6000. But I can imagine that the newer A6400+ generation camera's will have an advantage when shooting stills of quick moving objects.
Good comparison and valid points, Jason. Sony has come a long way since the A6000. I purchased the A6000 soon after it was released, when it was ahead of its time, and competition, but had some issues. You could download small “apps” to add features - not now. There were few native lenses, but the E-mount made for good adapted lenses. The hot shoe was fussy, the shutter noisy. Panorama mode was frustrating. Early units had lens mount light leaks, but you could easily replace them w/3rd party offerings. The flash was small, but you could tilt it backward. Disappointing battery, but very light weight camera overall.
It was a lot of fun watching this! I just bought a6000 and your channel has been a joy. I tried shooting both video and photo, while both are amazing for 10 years old device, indeed the photo is way better in terms of the comparison to recent cameras
thanks for this. Ive been watching a lot of videos and this one was the first one that spoke directly to my situation. Being that its an older camera, i didn't expect to find this. Great video. I pre-ordered the a6700 btw 👍🏾
I was on the fence but you talked me into keeping my a6000. Biggest reason? I don't do video (except for RUclips etc for which 1080p is plenty good). Plus I like to travel light and the a6700 is half again as heavy! I do like the flip screen and the weather sealing though.
I'm on the way same fence. Upgrade to to A6400. I mostly shoot portrait and my camera only has about 6K shutter count... But the AF and focus points on the A6400 is pretty impressively.
If I had to replace my a6000 it would be with the a6400. It has a lot of small improvements I'd actually use like I mentioned plus a better EVF, better screen, slightly better auto focus, electronic shutter etc. Good luck with it.
I have the Sony a6400 for over a year now and I'm planning to switch soon. Should I go for the Sony a6700 for all the new tech or a Fullframe like the A7C?
The card slot on the a6000 makes it a pain to remove. The card slot, better focusing, flip screen, and IBIS are worth the upgrade for me. Ordered it last night. When I started photography the a6000 had just came out. Tried some Nikon and Canon along the way as well but I'm sticking with Sony. Just upgraded glass last year. Good review man.
The A6400, at half the price, would make for a great comparison. How much better in real life is the AF? How much better is the built quality? How much more responsive is the screen for touch focus? Is it instantaneous? Is the IBIS head and shoulders above that of the A6500? Does the AF make a difference in day-to-day situations? Has the start up time been improved?
The a6400, now in my son's hands, is leagues better than then a6500 and the a6700 is leagues ahead of the a6400. But what the a6600 and a6400 have is far better autofocus than the older machines. Startup in my a6600 is instant while slow in my a6500. I will experience this issue when mine arrives early next month. What I like about the autofocus in the a6700 is that it is more refined over the A74. It comes from the A7R5, a machine that costs $4,000 US. It now includes bugs, planes, trains and automobiles. This will help me photographing bug as they do not stand still for anyone. While I like the A74, I feel the a6700 is going to overshadow it. That thing is going to breathe new life in aps-c cameras.
The a7RV in real world didn't focus any faster than the a7 IV. It just had more modes to focus on particular objects but as some have noted. They never had a issue focusing on planes, cars and trains. I mean they are super big objects.
2:50 not the most convincing slow mo example. 4:05 the A6000 looks wayyyyyyyy better here. Sony needs to get their act together and stop putting low-res screens on their APS-C bodies. 11:37 just as you're saying the a6700 has better eye AF, the A6000 video shown, once again, loks better.
The A6000 is still an amazing camera, I use mine all the time and love my silver body. The biggest upgrade is the added control wheel. And i do plan on getting the 6700 before summer
Viewers LOVE how you show both camera bodies to demonstrate the differences in size and shape. Also, I paid close attention to the ease in which the back screen on the A6700 swings to the side, so smoothly. I recommend everyone go to a camera store and handling the Sony A6700, A6600, Fuji, and Canon cameras, WITH attached lenses (the 18-135mm and 70-350mm sony zooms are fantastic and inexpensive for what they do, lightweight, and perfect for traveling). Compare the sony A6600/6700 to other cameras-I love the form factor of this camera
You always get thumbs up! Thanks for all the details. A7600 is going to do it for me, along with a 16mm Viltrox. Beyond that, I can keep my using my older lenses
The a6000 was the camera that started my mirrorless journey, moving from Pentax system. They are fabulous cameras and I owned two in the beginning. I upgraded to an a7ii, then the a7rii and then the a7iii. I sold my last a6000 and purchased an a6400 which is a companion to my a7iii. Now looking to upgrade the a6400 for the a6700.
It is a good camera even by todays standards, the tech is a little outdated. The image quality is still comparable, although the colours especially the skin tone rendering has been much improved over the following cameras. For me it has been the af improvements that has been the driver to upgrade as I primarily shot portraits. I purchased the a6700 yesterday for the fully articulating screen to enable me to use the camera at low and high angles etc.
Jason you are the first man I heard talking any sense about the resolution of the EVF and the main view screen; even the guys from the DP Review nitpick about this and I always ask why?.....the EVF and view screen are to compose and to check focus, in the review phase the image is jpeg and not what we see when we view our raw images
i have a a6000. i only do photography. so it's quite sufficient and a good deal. if you only do photography, i'd say the money is better spent in a good lens.
Truth is image quality hasn't change and it probably won't for a while. The biggest advancements will be improvements in AI and the ability to share faster like people do with smartphones. which they are kinda doing a better job of. I just did a event and was sharing photos instantly from Sony's creators app.
@@tomdemeo2708 download what? I already have the creators app. I just shared and send either by text or email and they get it. In my case I send it through text from the app.
Hi Jason! Great comparison video! I've got the 6400 myself and generally pair it with the Tamron 17-70. Been tossing up whether to sell+upgrade to the 6700 so i can keep the lens, or would you suggest jumping into full frame and new lens? I recently came back from a trip overseas and noticed that while the 6400 took great shots, I tend to crop into photos more and am losing quality with the crop (hence why i'm thinking of going FF). Any thoughts/suggestions? Thanks a million!
I found the text (ie ISO/aperture values) through the viewfinder on the a7c is MUCH smaller than the a6000 making it very hard to read. Can you compare the a6000 vs a6700 please?
Picked up an a5100 and a 35mm 1.8 I can definately get some good portraits with that. Like the comparison! been waiting for this release since i sold my Canon M200. The a6700 seems like its worth it over the ZVE10 with 4k60 better rolling shutter and weather sealing.
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema I think that’s underselling previous updates a bit. A bunch of the features touted in this compare, like ibis and higher resolution evf, were also in the a6500 and a6600. a6600 also has the new battery. And autofocus improved drastically from the a6000 to the a6600. This compare feels a little like stacking the deck in favor of the a6700.
Hey Jason nice video.. I am low with budget and can't afford a6700 though I like it for the features.. My workflow is not much.. I just take some fashion shots and portrait videos.. Suggest me should I stick with a6000 and invest in more lenses? Or I should go for some other options.. ? A6000 is still a rocking star.. Both pictures and videos ❤
I asked myself the same question, but I pre-ordered the a6700 for the new tech. I was shooting on the a6300 with Sigma APS-C lenses, and I think the a6700 is a better deal for the price. Think of a faster-charging port, better EVF, better autofocus AI-based, better grip than the A7C, and better color science. I have the Sigma 16 mm 1.4 and 30 mm 1.4, and I'm getting rid of the 30 mm 1.4 because from now on, I will start to buy full-frame glass on eBay as I did a few days ago I got a Sigma 24 mm 1.4 that is equivalent to a 35 mm, and in that way, I will be ready for an A7C II with all these new techs.
I took my a6000 out today to shoot so she doesn't feel left out. I honestly love shooting with it even though i have new ff cameras. If only the new c cameras had dual slots I'd be all over them.
Good timming, I am honestly thinking selling my (bcam) fx30 to get 6700 + buy zve10 or another one as my C cam to compansate the dual card? I never use Cine EI
Better lcd, IBIS, quality of video, and battery. That's all I looking for. What else i need more? It's a beast. Oh, I forgot the front dial. So Game's over. But I'm gonna buy it after some years, cuz I love my a6400. It's light, and fast enough for my second cam.
I recently had this exact dilemma, and ended up upgrading to a 6400. For photography the 6700 and 6600 have near identical specs. Main differences being the flippy screen, and better video capabilities. Then from there I realised that the only two differences between a 6400 and a 6600 from a photography perspective, is battery size, and in body stabilisation. In ibis look to make a small difference in photography according to reviews but I was happy living without it, so I thought I'd continue. The 6400 used the same battery as the 6000 but still has better battery life due to being more efficient I guess?
I recently had this exact dilemma, and ended up upgrading to a 6400. For photography the 6700 and 6600 have near identical specs. Main differences being the flippy screen, and better video capabilities. Then from there I realised that the only two differences between a 6400 and a 6600 from a photography perspective, is battery size, and in body stabilisation. In ibis look to make a small difference in photography according to reviews but I was happy living without it, so I thought I'd continue. The 6400 used the same battery as the 6000 but still has better battery life due to being more efficient I guess? If the a6000 ranked 0 and the 6700 ranked 10, I'd place the 6400 at about 7, it's a very nice upgrade to the 6000
Sony released the a6400 and a6600 within the same year, do you think there's an a6800 or a6900 in the pipeline? If so, what additional features you think it might get?
a6000 wasn't really ever a camera you'd get for videography as it never really offered external mic support. Having said that, we are comparing a $1900 AUD body with a 10yo camera that is worth about $350 on the used market. I bought one on marketplace just for the fun of it. It's still absolutely awesome for still photography, with its size making it perfect for travel snaps. And you do some OK video... it can competently film in 1080 at 25/50fps despite poor audio and no picture profiles. Mated to a Sony SEL35F18, the camera really is portable.
nice video, seems in the used market, a6700 is like 4x more expensive than a6000, I'm not sure its 4x better so will probably get a6000 as I just plan to take pics not video. thanks for the help ;)
It's kinda shameful for sony that does not change almost nothing in sensor quality. As it shown in video, in terms of photography, it has no difference between the two. It's been almost 10 years! Canon R7 has 32megapixel sensor and 30fps.
This is great fir hybrid and video shooters but lacking for photographers. Comprable to the r7 bur not better unfortunately. Looking forward to a professional flagship aspc with 2 slots and 30+mp plus top of the line autofocus. Became anticanon after their arrogant 3rd party ban. But Sony needs to step up their game or nikon will pull ahead.
I am an A6000 owner since 2014, and I've been taking a lot of photos of my new daughter. I am still impressed with the quality of the photos the A6000 is taking using a Sony 18-105 F4 lens that I basically keep on it all the time, as it is just a great all-around camera and video lens, with built in steady-shot. I just received a new A6700 today, but I've kept it in the box unopened because I'm just not yet convinced that it will be enough of a leap over my A6000 for my purposes. Yes, I know the auto-focus is awesome, and it has 4K video, but honestly, after looking at the pics you showed side by side from the A6000 and A6700, I don't think I'm going to keep the A6700. I'm happy enough with the 1080p 30FPS/60FPS video on the A6000, and now, thanks to your video, I don't even think for still photos that there will be enough of an improvement to justify the $1900 Canadian cost. I think I'll send it back for a full refund, and just wait until there is another APS-C 6000 series camera from Sony that does eliminate the shortcomings of the A6700, or, until I just can't stand it anymore and I go full frame, and maybe pick up an A7C II used for less than $2,000 Canadian. But the cost of full frame lenses scares the crap out of me. :)
Send it back and maybe get a prime or 2 that will work on full frame so you are future ready if you switch. Samyang makes some f2.8 full frame lenses that are super tiny and compliment the a6000 well
For still photography even a 10 year old camera can produce same result as latest. Its only in video shooting where latest bodies help.
I still use D3s, D810 and even D90
Now I was wondering if this is true. When shooting pictures of my children I can imagine that a faster (tracking/eye) AF will be a plus. My children (and probably anyone's children) never sit still so it is always a hassle to get them in focus. I'm using a Nex-6, so that is even one generation older than the A6000. But I can imagine that the newer A6400+ generation camera's will have an advantage when shooting stills of quick moving objects.
@@matthiasj668the a6100 is a very solid camera when it comes to AF you can find it for cheap now too. 😊
I've just picked up a6000 with kit lens and 55-210 for 250CAD$. Quite happy with the deal, love the AF performance from an almost 10 years old camera.
I had been using a6000 for 4 years, it is best for photos. I changed it to ZVE10 when I started to do more on videos for my family activities.
This is the comparison I was waiting for. Thanks Jason
Thanks for watching
Thank you so much for making this video. Please know that there are some people that was(and will be) actually looking for this information.
Good comparison and valid points, Jason. Sony has come a long way since the A6000. I purchased the A6000 soon after it was released, when it was ahead of its time, and competition, but had some issues. You could download small “apps” to add features - not now. There were few native lenses, but the E-mount made for good adapted lenses. The hot shoe was fussy, the shutter noisy. Panorama mode was frustrating. Early units had lens mount light leaks, but you could easily replace them w/3rd party offerings. The flash was small, but you could tilt it backward. Disappointing battery, but very light weight camera overall.
It was a lot of fun watching this! I just bought a6000 and your channel has been a joy. I tried shooting both video and photo, while both are amazing for 10 years old device, indeed the photo is way better in terms of the comparison to recent cameras
Man I started with a6000 brings back memories!
The good old days
thanks for this. Ive been watching a lot of videos and this one was the first one that spoke directly to my situation. Being that its an older camera, i didn't expect to find this. Great video. I pre-ordered the a6700 btw 👍🏾
It was a massive question I got asked a lot
please compare it with a6400/a6600. please also add the low light and dynamic range comparison in the video
Trying to get my hands on the a6400
For me it is all about photo image quality. The 6700 is a step up, but it's not game changing so I'll hang onto my A6000 for a bit longer.
I was on the fence but you talked me into keeping my a6000. Biggest reason? I don't do video (except for RUclips etc for which 1080p is plenty good). Plus I like to travel light and the a6700 is half again as heavy! I do like the flip screen and the weather sealing though.
I'm on the way same fence. Upgrade to to A6400. I mostly shoot portrait and my camera only has about 6K shutter count... But the AF and focus points on the A6400 is pretty impressively.
If I had to replace my a6000 it would be with the a6400. It has a lot of small improvements I'd actually use like I mentioned plus a better EVF, better screen, slightly better auto focus, electronic shutter etc. Good luck with it.
I have the Sony a6400 for over a year now and I'm planning to switch soon. Should I go for the Sony a6700 for all the new tech or a Fullframe like the A7C?
Rumors of a7cii is coming out soon. Wait for that first.
If you’ve got a lot of aps-c lenses I would stick will aps-c
The card slot on the a6000 makes it a pain to remove. The card slot, better focusing, flip screen, and IBIS are worth the upgrade for me. Ordered it last night. When I started photography the a6000 had just came out. Tried some Nikon and Canon along the way as well but I'm sticking with Sony. Just upgraded glass last year. Good review man.
Card slot on the bottom was not fun
I am making this exact decision. Very helpful.
I think for a wildlife shooter the auto focus alone may make the purchase worthwhile.
The 1080p on the a6000 is STILL valid today man! It was way ahead of it's time! But I'm gonna buy the a6700.
Really? I think that 1080p in a6000 looks like 720p 🤔
The A6400, at half the price, would make for a great comparison. How much better in real life is the AF? How much better is the built quality? How much more responsive is the screen for touch focus? Is it instantaneous? Is the IBIS head and shoulders above that of the A6500?
Does the AF make a difference in day-to-day situations?
Has the start up time been improved?
The a6400, now in my son's hands, is leagues better than then a6500 and the a6700 is leagues ahead of the a6400. But what the a6600 and a6400 have is far better autofocus than the older machines. Startup in my a6600 is instant while slow in my a6500. I will experience this issue when mine arrives early next month. What I like about the autofocus in the a6700 is that it is more refined over the A74. It comes from the A7R5, a machine that costs $4,000 US. It now includes bugs, planes, trains and automobiles. This will help me photographing bug as they do not stand still for anyone. While I like the A74, I feel the a6700 is going to overshadow it. That thing is going to breathe new life in aps-c cameras.
The a7RV in real world didn't focus any faster than the a7 IV. It just had more modes to focus on particular objects but as some have noted. They never had a issue focusing on planes, cars and trains. I mean they are super big objects.
2:50 not the most convincing slow mo example. 4:05 the A6000 looks wayyyyyyyy better here. Sony needs to get their act together and stop putting low-res screens on their APS-C bodies. 11:37 just as you're saying the a6700 has better eye AF, the A6000 video shown, once again, loks better.
The A6000 is still an amazing camera, I use mine all the time and love my silver body. The biggest upgrade is the added control wheel. And i do plan on getting the 6700 before summer
The A6000 is a good little camera, no frills and does everything well for stills photography.
Viewers LOVE how you show both camera bodies to demonstrate the differences in size and shape. Also, I paid close attention to the ease in which the back screen on the A6700 swings to the side, so smoothly. I recommend everyone go to a camera store and handling the Sony A6700, A6600, Fuji, and Canon cameras, WITH attached lenses (the 18-135mm and 70-350mm sony zooms are fantastic and inexpensive for what they do, lightweight, and perfect for traveling). Compare the sony A6600/6700 to other cameras-I love the form factor of this camera
this is a great to show the evolution of Sony a6xxx line APS-C line
You always get thumbs up! Thanks for all the details. A7600 is going to do it for me, along with a 16mm Viltrox. Beyond that, I can keep my using my older lenses
I just bought the a6700 and the lenses from a6000 dont click on it, what is that? Im so disappointed
The 6700 looks very much like the apsc version of the ZV-E1 so are we looking at the same kind of issues with overheating?
The a6000 was the camera that started my mirrorless journey, moving from Pentax system. They are fabulous cameras and I owned two in the beginning. I upgraded to an a7ii, then the a7rii and then the a7iii. I sold my last a6000 and purchased an a6400 which is a companion to my a7iii. Now looking to upgrade the a6400 for the a6700.
Would it be a good investment to buy a SONY A6000 as their first EVER (mirrorless) camera? It seems worth it and I wouldn't mind purchasing. Opinions?
It is a good camera even by todays standards, the tech is a little outdated. The image quality is still comparable, although the colours especially the skin tone rendering has been much improved over the following cameras. For me it has been the af improvements that has been the driver to upgrade as I primarily shot portraits. I purchased the a6700 yesterday for the fully articulating screen to enable me to use the camera at low and high angles etc.
Love your videos!
Thank you
Great vid cheers and a red!! you'll never walk alone chap
Jason you are the first man I heard talking any sense about the resolution of the EVF and the main view screen; even the guys from the DP Review nitpick about this and I always ask why?.....the EVF and view screen are to compose and to check focus, in the review phase the image is jpeg and not what we see when we view our raw images
I have no idea. Everyone seems to want super high res EVF and screens but I don’t see a use in it other than it looking good
i have a a6000. i only do photography. so it's quite sufficient and a good deal. if you only do photography, i'd say the money is better spent in a good lens.
Truth is image quality hasn't change and it probably won't for a while. The biggest advancements will be improvements in AI and the ability to share faster like people do with smartphones. which they are kinda doing a better job of. I just did a event and was sharing photos instantly from Sony's creators app.
Instantly? Didn’t you have to download to your phone first?
@@tomdemeo2708 download what? I already have the creators app. I just shared and send either by text or email and they get it. In my case I send it through text from the app.
Hi Jason! Great comparison video! I've got the 6400 myself and generally pair it with the Tamron 17-70. Been tossing up whether to sell+upgrade to the 6700 so i can keep the lens, or would you suggest jumping into full frame and new lens? I recently came back from a trip overseas and noticed that while the 6400 took great shots, I tend to crop into photos more and am losing quality with the crop (hence why i'm thinking of going FF). Any thoughts/suggestions?
Thanks a million!
does a6000 and a6400 have the same sensor? i dont thinkso
No. As mentioned in the video. Older 24MP and the newest 26MP
I found the text (ie ISO/aperture values) through the viewfinder on the a7c is MUCH smaller than the a6000 making it very hard to read.
Can you compare the a6000 vs a6700 please?
Me too!
I ordered the a6700 yesterday as an upgrade to my a6000 😅
Oh nice! Hopefully you will notice the difference
Picked up an a5100 and a 35mm 1.8 I can definately get some good portraits with that. Like the comparison! been waiting for this release since i sold my Canon M200. The a6700 seems like its worth it over the ZVE10 with 4k60 better rolling shutter and weather sealing.
For sure. A5100 is still perfectly fine for photography
Great review! I would love to see a comparison to one of the other ibis-equipped a6xxx models.
There wouldn’t be much to compared since a6100, 6400, 6500, 6600 are practically the same with minor differences. I’ll try get the zv-e10 to compare
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema I think that’s underselling previous updates a bit. A bunch of the features touted in this compare, like ibis and higher resolution evf, were also in the a6500 and a6600. a6600 also has the new battery. And autofocus improved drastically from the a6000 to the a6600. This compare feels a little like stacking the deck in favor of the a6700.
Hey Jason nice video.. I am low with budget and can't afford a6700 though I like it for the features.. My workflow is not much.. I just take some fashion shots and portrait videos.. Suggest me should I stick with a6000 and invest in more lenses? Or I should go for some other options.. ?
A6000 is still a rocking star.. Both pictures and videos ❤
Thanks! Sony a6700 for all the new tech or a Fullframe like the A7C like a first cam?
I asked myself the same question, but I pre-ordered the a6700 for the new tech. I was shooting on the a6300 with Sigma APS-C lenses, and I think the a6700 is a better deal for the price. Think of a faster-charging port, better EVF, better autofocus AI-based, better grip than the A7C, and better color science. I have the Sigma 16 mm 1.4 and 30 mm 1.4, and I'm getting rid of the 30 mm 1.4 because from now on, I will start to buy full-frame glass on eBay as I did a few days ago I got a Sigma 24 mm 1.4 that is equivalent to a 35 mm, and in that way, I will be ready for an A7C II with all these new techs.
A6700 IMO
@@thedesignux Thank you for your detailed answer!
I took my a6000 out today to shoot so she doesn't feel left out. I honestly love shooting with it even though i have new ff cameras. If only the new c cameras had dual slots I'd be all over them.
Good timming, I am honestly thinking selling my (bcam) fx30 to get 6700 + buy zve10 or another one as my C cam to compansate the dual card? I never use Cine EI
Hmm. Fx30 is better for video. A6700 is a better photo camera
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema thank you so much foe your message. 🙏💪
Better lcd, IBIS, quality of video, and battery. That's all I looking for. What else i need more? It's a beast. Oh, I forgot the front dial. So Game's over. But I'm gonna buy it after some years, cuz I love my a6400. It's light, and fast enough for my second cam.
Something else that changed is that the A6000 has an anti-aliasing filter, whereas the A6700 does not.
great side by side comparision
Thank you
I just added external monitor to a6k, really help when shooting vertical portrait xD
Yeah it does. Nice
Not gonna lie, as a primarily video shooter these days, I've been tempted to sell my a7iii and swap it with an a6700.
Can it be used for commercial shooting for example weddings? Can you even call him professional?
Just got my a6700 today. So fast autofocus compared to a6000.
Super fast. Sonys newest focus system
Hi! Are cages from Sony a6000/6400/6600 compatible with Sony a6700?
No.
No shocker here which is better but in my area you can find A6000 for $300 body only, that's a sizable difference in cost.
Waiting for comparison between Fuji XS-20 and Sony a6700. There's really no one on RUclips making these it's extremely suspicious.
I want to replace my a6000 with an a6100 or an a6700? It is only for photography
I recently had this exact dilemma, and ended up upgrading to a 6400.
For photography the 6700 and 6600 have near identical specs. Main differences being the flippy screen, and better video capabilities. Then from there I realised that the only two differences between a 6400 and a 6600 from a photography perspective, is battery size, and in body stabilisation. In ibis look to make a small difference in photography according to reviews but I was happy living without it, so I thought I'd continue. The 6400 used the same battery as the 6000 but still has better battery life due to being more efficient I guess?
I recently had this exact dilemma, and ended up upgrading to a 6400.
For photography the 6700 and 6600 have near identical specs. Main differences being the flippy screen, and better video capabilities. Then from there I realised that the only two differences between a 6400 and a 6600 from a photography perspective, is battery size, and in body stabilisation. In ibis look to make a small difference in photography according to reviews but I was happy living without it, so I thought I'd continue. The 6400 used the same battery as the 6000 but still has better battery life due to being more efficient I guess?
If the a6000 ranked 0 and the 6700 ranked 10, I'd place the 6400 at about 7, it's a very nice upgrade to the 6000
Woww this review gana be the og of the og
Og gang
Sony released the a6400 and a6600 within the same year, do you think there's an a6800 or a6900 in the pipeline? If so, what additional features you think it might get?
Gosh I wouldn’t be thinking that far ahead. If anything I feel a ZV-E10 II would be next. A6700 minus a few features I would imagine
a6000 wasn't really ever a camera you'd get for videography as it never really offered external mic support. Having said that, we are comparing a $1900 AUD body with a 10yo camera that is worth about $350 on the used market. I bought one on marketplace just for the fun of it. It's still absolutely awesome for still photography, with its size making it perfect for travel snaps. And you do some OK video... it can competently film in 1080 at 25/50fps despite poor audio and no picture profiles. Mated to a Sony SEL35F18, the camera really is portable.
TLDR.
A6000 = Photos only
A6700 = Photos + Video
Sir can i buy 6000 for only photography..
I still love my a6000 and I have no reason to upgrade. I only shoot stills so the video features are irrelevant to me.
As you saw stills were very similar and you can still get great stills from the a6000
nice video, seems in the used market, a6700 is like 4x more expensive than a6000, I'm not sure its 4x better so will probably get a6000 as I just plan to take pics not video. thanks for the help ;)
Maby Black Friday or in a year or so the 6700 will be cheaper.
Imagine that camera at $1000
me watching videos like this because i know ill never get a camera haha :D
Both nice cameras but I would get the newer model for sure.
For the win
TL;DR: photo - a6000; video - a6700
Sony a6700 vs sony zve10 pls
If I can get my hands on a zv-e10
As a stills shooter, the A6000 is still providing enough!
Agreed
I am going to leave my A7IV home and travel with A6700 + Sigma 16-50mm F/2.8 lens. I need lighter package for my trip including M3 gimbal.
It's kinda shameful for sony that does not change almost nothing in sensor quality. As it shown in video, in terms of photography, it has no difference between the two. It's been almost 10 years! Canon R7 has 32megapixel sensor and 30fps.
This is great fir hybrid and video shooters but lacking for photographers. Comprable to the r7 bur not better unfortunately. Looking forward to a professional flagship aspc with 2 slots and 30+mp plus top of the line autofocus.
Became anticanon after their arrogant 3rd party ban. But Sony needs to step up their game or nikon will pull ahead.
In the picture comparison seems that a6000 have focused better in eyes than a6700 😆😅
But the overheating issue in their generation has not stop still continues.
I am an A6000 owner since 2014, and I've been taking a lot of photos of my new daughter. I am still impressed with the quality of the photos the A6000 is taking using a Sony 18-105 F4 lens that I basically keep on it all the time, as it is just a great all-around camera and video lens, with built in steady-shot. I just received a new A6700 today, but I've kept it in the box unopened because I'm just not yet convinced that it will be enough of a leap over my A6000 for my purposes. Yes, I know the auto-focus is awesome, and it has 4K video, but honestly, after looking at the pics you showed side by side from the A6000 and A6700, I don't think I'm going to keep the A6700. I'm happy enough with the 1080p 30FPS/60FPS video on the A6000, and now, thanks to your video, I don't even think for still photos that there will be enough of an improvement to justify the $1900 Canadian cost. I think I'll send it back for a full refund, and just wait until there is another APS-C 6000 series camera from Sony that does eliminate the shortcomings of the A6700, or, until I just can't stand it anymore and I go full frame, and maybe pick up an A7C II used for less than $2,000 Canadian. But the cost of full frame lenses scares the crap out of me. :)
Send it back and maybe get a prime or 2 that will work on full frame so you are future ready if you switch. Samyang makes some f2.8 full frame lenses that are super tiny and compliment the a6000 well
The A6700's screen is actually 1.04 million dots (rounded up) not 1.3 million dots. I wish it was 1.3 million dots 😆
🤷🏽♂️ thanks
still choose a6000 since I only take photo with it xD
video can use iphone 12 pro good enough already
For sure
Sony a6000 vs Sony a7c
Don't shoot video so it doesn't matter
译成中文字幕就好了！
Gyat
Not even sure why you would compare the 6000, maybe the 6400 or 6600
don't pay for it go get full frame
Why?
멋진 리뷰야! 최고야!