Nunchuck Shadiversity Response 2 | Revenge of The Nunchucker
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 сен 2021
- I know many of you have been waiting for this upload, I apologize for the wait. If my channel continues to receive support, I will consistently upload. I hope you guys enjoy this long awaited upload and hopefully, FINALLY, we can move on to more important subjects. My plan in this video was to correct my mistakes while clarifying myself, as well as addressing some of Shadiversity's bizarre claims based on his limited experience. Again, thank you all for your support. Be sure to like and subscribe if you enjoyed and follow my socials!
Instagram- milani.fitness
BabaBooey moment
Bruh! That alot o BabaBooey
I made a video too adding to u and to Shad. I am more to shad side but you do have vaild points. I made a video long ago about this replying to Shadversity. Do u want to collaborate?
Gotta say you impressed me with your movement..
You are great you have interesting skills
you didnt disprove shads point tho... all he said is the nunchucks are garbage weapons. that is true. there arent any accounts of arming armies with nunchucks we dont see lone nunchucker users defeating sword masters. and his biggest point is they are way too unwieldy for what they offer. you can teach a dirt poor farmer how to stand in a line and hold a shield and spear. good luck teaching someone to use nunchucks to defend the village from raiders. those were shads biggest points and you failed to prove otherwise. instead you narrowed in on his specific small comments like bouncing the nunchucks or how he swung them, his whole point was just how bad they are as a weapon. if 2 people got into a random fight and one picked up a big stick and the other grab some nunchucks im putting my money on the untrained stick guy rather than the untrained nunchucks guy. i look forward to seeing what your stance is on the core argument rather than shads techniques as an untrained user.
@@fredconney2896 "you didnt disprove shads point tho..."
Actually he did. And so have everyone else who have responded to his "evidence" supporting his "argument".
"all he said is the nunchucks are garbage weapons. "
Repeated ad nauseam trying to prove lie to be truth with repetition.
"that is true. "
Which is not true.
"there arent any accounts of arming armies with nunchucks "
There aren't any accounts of arming armies with sticks either.
"we dont see lone nunchucker users defeating sword masters. "
Actually you do see them.
"and his biggest point is they are way too unwieldy for what they offer. "
Being way more agile and convenient to use than his useless baton he misleadingly tries to present as pinnacle of hand-to.hand weapons.
"you can teach a dirt poor farmer how to stand in a line and hold a shield and spear. "
Irrelevant "argument".
"good luck teaching someone to use nunchucks to defend the village from raiders. "
Why should somebody be taught to use something they already know how to use?
"those were shads biggest points "
His "points" were based on completely fictional premise so of course they are stupid and useless points.
"and you failed to prove otherwise. "
He actually proved just that.
"instead you narrowed in on his specific small comments like bouncing the nunchucks or how he swung them, his whole point was just how bad they are as a weapon. "
Which is wrong conclusion found with wrong evidence, wrong research and cherry-picked "evidence".
"if 2 people got into a random fight and one picked up a big stick and the other grab some nunchucks im putting my money on the untrained stick guy rather than the untrained nunchucks guy. "
Prepare to lose your money in half of your bets.
"i look forward to seeing what your stance is on the core argument rather than shads techniques as an untrained user. "
His "core argument" has been proven bullshit by sheer history of nunchaku existing and seeing active use today by American police. I have never shot Springfield 1903 bolt-action rifle. Judging by this video they are stupid scam "weapon": ruclips.net/video/o9q7b_2tkMo/видео.html
The only way to finally settle this is a physical duel. Shad with a stick, and you with nunchucks.
It would end with deluded and bitter Australian wannabe-cult leader having his skull smashed in and everybody knows that.
😂😂😂 true
I will se that😂😂
shad would get winded after 3 swings of the stick
Shad is so out of shape, he'll collapse of exhaustion after 1 minute
I want to see a person who knows martial art with nunchucks vs a guy with a stick and does HEMA. That would be a more fair comparison.
Indeed.
And not someone who tries to stay in optimal nunchuck distance (with a knife) while stabing the air 3 meters next to him and slip and sliding on wet gras because he wears socks.
ruclips.net/video/MgUzsL0hH9M/видео.html
No, not in this case. Shad in his original video said that nunchucks in a "self defense situation" would be ineffective. The scenario that Milani set up is about as accurate as you could get.
@@bass-dc9175 Is trying not to get hit and actively attempting to evade each strike "trying to stay in optimal nunchuck distance"? I thought that was what was happening, and he didn't seem to slip around that much to me
If both combatants are trying not to get hit, then yeah sure, but all the guy has to do is rush him and take the hit to get in close and start stabbing.
Military Close Combat Instructor here, I am not a professional in Martial Arts or anything, but I have to say that knife fight was ludicrous. Such a fight would never transpire. No one comes at you with a knife ready to spar. You keep it concealed, you get close and then go on stabbing without pause or relent until the opponent is down. Will a nunchuck help you then? If you are not ready probably not. if he is less than 6 steps away it's hard to draw your pistol in time. Is that a critique on the nunchuck? No, no weapon will be ideal here. If he starts stabbing only protective gear will aid, and you can hopefully shoot or slap him off afterwards. No weapon will aid you here.
In general too the nunchuck, I can't see it practical in actual combat, but that is cause I always evaluate things with a soldiers mind: Can I use that tired, with a 30kg backpack, a vest and my rifle dangling about. BUt in a streetfight? I can't judge, no experience with them. I honestly believe that someone that trained like you will kick my ass with it no problem.
The respect thing... Idk, I am not sure. I respect my weapons, but I guess handling rifles and machine guns is different. I don't have a martial arts mindset at all too, and never really did it. Military fighting is just dirty tricks and no elegence. There is only the intent to not be killed. So... it is much more dirty by default, and just pragmatic
My guy, it's not a weapon for the battlefield I thought we had established this 😂 what are you raving on about lmao. Two responses of mine and that still isn't clear? Jeez.
@@milanifitnessofficial No no, you got me wrong xD
No melee weapon is one anymore. Its just the knife fight. If you want to hurt someone with a knife, you keep it concealed, get close and then draw and stab. I just dislike the multitude of "knife defends" online. If someone with a knife comes at you, you can only hope to wear vest. Or just run in time
I might have phrased it wrong, no native, I don't disagree with you at all about this. Shad is overreacting, the nunchuck is a good weapon in the right hands, everything can be after all. I just don't understand your knife defense, cause who uses a knife like that?
You're absolutely right, you never want to have to tango with a knife, the demonstration was if you HAD TO and so happen to have a pair of nunchucks on you at the time(very hypothetical demonstration anyway). Also the attacker in the demonstration was meant to be untrained because more than likely in a street fight you will not be versing a green beret.
@@milanifitnessofficial
Yeah I get that you wanted to show it works! And I guess it does. Its just, knifes are like the untrainiest weapons. If someone uses them like this, he deserves his ass kicked. As said, you would hand me mine in a fair fight every time, I am quite certain.
Just, I don't like the: you can use this in the streets mentality, cause I think one has to be one hell of a machine to do. And an aggressor with a knife can completely choose when to reveal it. In a fair fight, as seen in the vid, knifes can't do a thing against range. Its quite like that grapple thing you talked about.
My advice in a streetfight, whenever possible would just be run.
Quit flattering me, you're the MILITARY INSTRUCTOR here, you'd wup my ass bro.
Watching this back again, just realized, the knife you split was made of solid oak, wow broken in two with one strike, not even forward hand. I don't think people understand, when you get hit with these, there's a reason they sting that bad and cause such serious bruising with the slightest impact.
That point about not overswinging is so important!! Not only for when you miss, but also to not lose control to defend yourself from an attack if the opponent attempted to strike at the same time, was not instantly incapacitated or if you’re fighting multiple people!!
It’s important to train that basic habit because it is always much more useful to have it than not.
Besides there’s a point of force in which the power becomes irrelevant. If it gets the job done, that’s enough force and the unpredictability of the weapon and other factors will grant more advantages to a weapon in its use against a real opponent. Weapons aren’t just in a competition on which can whack the hardest, they are used in many more dimensions in active combat.
Great vid!!
Nice points. Note that you can apply follow-through or "overswing" without losing your composure. You just need to transition that energy into a follow-up swing. You should stop accelerating the weapon at the point on the other side of your target, certainly, and focus on turning it for the next blow.
In longsword, it's common to stop the blow at middle-guard, so as to present the point and control the centre, but this comes at the cost of a far weaker swing, if you do hit.
Power does become overkill at some point. Even those toy nunchucks can break limbs without much effort. Note that in physical tests, though, the mechanical advantage of flails leads to them inflicting more destruction. Similar to how much worse a tonfa is, from that little spin.
And when your mele-weapon has no defensive capasities, then this really does'nt matter and the stickfighter will win just by that extra capasity.
@@Xirque666 Ummm... you should really make some nunchaku and try it out, instead of going off a fat nerd's opinion. You can block with nunchaku, or grapple with them. The idea of eskrima duelling with an attacker is laughably absurd, your main issue is liable to be knives which can't really be parried.
@@vanivanov9571 nope, you can't, and that Milan have already said.
And be my guest to grapple a center oss helt shield used together with a battle axe, seax or sword (all weapons that are of equal reach) or a long sword (i know it has reach advantage, in the same way that the chucks has in the video against the "toothpick knife", or perhaps a quarterstaff, still a simpler weapon than the chucks, but better. Or the mace (that is what I call a stick).
It know I know the thing about correct distance when it comes to linked tools. I use whips, crops and cat o"nine tales in sexual play (I'm a Sadist),
@@Xirque666 Really pathetic attempt to make yourself appear edgy by referring to BDSM, son. What else stupid lying you can come up with?
Your vids are good mate. While i do agree with Shad, i respect your opinion and skill. Btw those sai are badass, could you do a demo with those?
Do you have a link for the foam nunchucks you use?
You *should* be able to find them at any martial arts supply store online. Last I checked, the same place that everybody buys their uniforms from is where they also get these kinds of chucks
Very good video! I played around with nunchucks for a month and it was not hard at all to learn the basics. Honestly the way you control the flow of weight feels quite natural.
Oh, Skallagrim mentioned this video! Actually that's how I came here now. I'm glad both he and you made these videos because I was a bit overly commited to Shad's side.
Recently saw his vid myself, and wanted to see if anyone else brought it up
Well he deleted it now like a wimp. Scared of Shads army.
@@milanifitnessofficial what? Dude. It's alright. They're nunchucks. I don't see armies of hell.
It's odd the video went down because there was no backlash when I watched it. The comment section was rather lovely and people were on Skall's side.
@@theodorealenas3171 LOL they were on his side because he actually made sense and basically said what I said just way better. AND he's actually got the subs to back his opinion unlike a certain someone you may know. Literally if you compare me and Skals opinions they differ almost not at all, of you listen closely that is.
You don't see the army? Have a look through the comments of my original video and this one lol.
@@milanifitnessofficial Yeah. But I don't find your and Skall's videos similar.
I liked your sparring footage, it answered all "how bad is this disadvantage". And... Skall's video got everything else.
I can't believe he deleted it. It must have been a RUclips hiccup
Good balance of professionalism and memes, will be interesting to see this saga continue.
Also kinda surprised you didn't include gun as example of self defense weapon without defensive capacity, is it because of its lethality?
Betting Shadi does not respond, that he figures he's already milked that drama. Since he's currently thinking of getting in on Matt and Todd's action, talking about how cool flails are... I think he's trying to bury his past "expertise" about flails being inferior.
Could be mistaken, he might make a big video about how nunchaku and flails use different sets of physics. He did get a big uptick in views, a lot better than his other videos have been fairing.
As for the list of weapons I think he was specifying melee weapons to keep it simple.
@@vanivanov9571 I'd like to believe that Shad is interested enough in the discussion about weapons to not just ignore this totally, but you're right that he sadly might not make a video about this.
Also taser was included in the list of self defence weapons, so thats where my thought of guns came from. But I suppose the tasers available for civilians are also melee.
@@eerolz8758 Then the truth is disappointing. He ignored Object History 's video entirely, and it was an AMAZING video on the subject that far surpassed all the others. He turned down an offer to discuss the issue point-blank, as he prefers to insult people sexually from the other side of a video.
So the only reason he'll respond to this and not OH is because he thinks Milani is a good strawman, which is why he picked the smallest possible youtuber with the weakest available argument in the first place.
Well yeah lmao guns are just the be all end all of weapons, and you don't try to physically tussle with a firearm. That's, how you die.
@@milanifitnessofficial People wielding guns have been defeated in hand-to-hand, but you definitely are right about them being very dangerous. They have range and any actually competent gunman knows to make use of it. That is why Jimmy Hoffa (in great film) tells to charge the gun as it loses it's advantage of range in close range. Still would not recommend it.
nice response, nice tecnique, great edits, great video. What is your base martial art? i just came here from Skall´s channel, i´m gonna watch some more
I've had training in many different arts, when I was young my foundation was Taekwondo and Japanese Jujitsu, while later I expanded to boxing, wrestling, kung fu, Muay Thai and so on. Currently I consider myself a Jeet Kune Do Martial artist as it's basically my own style.
I know this is an older video, but I do like your defence of Nunchucks.
Since, although they are illegal in my country. I believe they are an excellent non-lethal self defense weapon.
As well, they are an excellent piece of equipment, that helps in training reflex and coordination.
Any, nice video.
Keep up the great videos. I don’t have a opinion either way with regard to this topic. I just like watching for the learning and different points of view.
I am wondering what it would be like to block the Nunckuck. Let's say you have a Baton or Shad's girthy stick, is it realistic to block nunchuck strikes, or is it too fast/deceptive? And if a strike is blocked, how easy is the recovery for the nunchuck user? I could imagine that it would throw me off pretty hard if the strike is stopped preemptively, but someone who is trained might have no issues with that. Would you run into trouble if the stick intercepts the Nunchuck at the chain, since it would cause it to wrap around?
As a nunchuck practitioner myself I’m actually curious about this as well, I would guess that a nunchaku practitioner wouldn’t have much problem being blocked because most of them including myself train to follow through on all strikes so with that logic they would simply follow through and hit the block and come back with another strike because when they get blocked it would probably just feel like they were striking normally and following through but idk I’ve never sparred with my nunchucks and never had someone block a strike before sooo🤷♂️
If the nunchuck would wrap around it could be an issue if he was to yank tight away and the nunchuck user lost his grip and his weapon however while the guy with the stick was doing that I would simply tackle him and take the fight to the ground.
HEMA is a martial art, in literally means Historical, European, Martial, Arts, so if you are considering only the martial arts of east asia in your explanation you should poit it out.
Pedant
No. Bad take.
Literally find one example of an average person who uses "martial arts" to refer to HEMA and asian martial arts.
Its a little disingenuous to say Shad won't respond to Wushu Engineer when Shad actually told people to go watch his videos.
But he won't make a response directly to that video acknowledging his points are valid. He hates to be proven wrong, in any sense of the word, thus he will not address it directly.
@@milanifitnessofficial he has already proven you wrong by mm athematical physics, so no need to do that.
@@Xirque666 Sorry, but referring to non-existent evidence does not count as valid argument, kid.
@@vksasdgaming9472 🤣
Kid you can be yourself, for all you know I might be older than you. It does'nt matter what you think, cause I know, it is physics, something even the testa Milano Fitness linkes to show, the stick transefered more energy, that trancelated to "Hit Harder" in lowbrow, something that give more pain and dmg.
Also, the chucks has no defensive properties what so ever, the stick can easily be used in defence against the chucks, while using that time to advance closer so close that the chucks are innefectice, and continue the attach in shorter range.
@@Xirque666 Did you know that force equals mass times speed? Actually you did not. Lighter nunchaku on same speed hits with less force. That is more than compensated by mechanical advantage of nunchaku moving faster with same effort. In practical sense rigid sTIK and nunchaku hit just as hard.
Sorry, but sTIK has no defensive properties what so ever as nunchaku and any other weapon easily goes past and attempting to advance closer just brings you to grappling range where sTIK is beyond useless while nunchaku can be used to bind and crush. Getting your throat in a nutcracker grip will end your fight very fast.
Can't you figure out any new idiotic "arguments" or are you just too stupid to try? Those old myths spammed as new lies are boring me.
Your main advantage in the fight is your extended reach, not the nunchucks itself. Give your opponend an equally long weapon.
Mass wouldnt be the same
@@danielestrada3390 Make it slightly thinner. There. Done.
A stick of equal length and mass will outperform a nunchuck.
Or.. don't?
I mean, I don't know who's gonna attack you with a machete or something in America (or Australia, for that matter). Shad's original point was that nunchucks are absolute poopoo caca for self defense, and as a weapon in general. A point on which he is pretty demonstrably wrong.
2:55 If anyone is curious that clip is from an old Collegehumor video called Shamwow guy in jail
Is it better a nunchaku made with the rope or with the chain and why? Did you chopped your nunchaku?
Thanks
Both work in standard configuration.
@@vksasdgaming9472 ok
There is not really a difference, very minor.
Keep them coming and I'll keep watching. This back and forth with Shad is entertaining.
I guess it is interesting to see someone way-above-their head and bloated ego get utterly annihilated. Actually it is not only interesting it is also funny.
It's toxic and annoying and it's one of the bad results of the internet
@@Helltown66 bad?? It's scientific debate.
@@markmorris7123 You are exaggerating. Australian racist is incapable of scientific debate.
"shad is bad with weapons therefore he is wrong" is an ad-hominem attack not a debunking to his argument
saying "the weapon doesn't have issues if you have skill with it" doesn't debunk him either because a main point to shad's argument is that the skill requirement just to not harm yourself and use it effectively is too high compared to similar weapons
Damn bro you really didn't watch the video did you
@@milanifitnessofficial for point 1 4:39 dismissing shad due to lack of striking knowledge
for point 2 at 10:27 literally dismiss an issue because training
watch your own video
@@44Tuckster To use a weapon properly you need training??? Ask any professional, I don't see your point.
@@milanifitnessofficial I never claimed that a weapon could be use properly without training.
You mean five minutes of show-and-tell is too much training? Or about an hour of practical study.
Longbow does not demand training. It demands raising into. Your waifu debunks himself with his bitter ineptitude.
The major shit show with his videos is his bias.
Let’s start with the claim
“The nunchuck is useless”
He then demonstrates some REALLLY pathetic swings, to the point I don’t believe they’re genuine swings at all in attempt to use the weapon as inefficiently as possible to paint it in a negative light.
Then, when shown by martial artists with the nunchuck how hard they can hit he uses a motte and Bailey argument where he’s retreating from his first claim of “they’re terrible useless weapons” to an argument of “oh well it takes time to train with these and a stick doesn’t! So the stick is better because ANYONE can pick up a stick and use them effectively!”
Now my problem with that is…no they can’t. For the ONE video he shown of some burglar with nunchucks getting rushed I can show him 10 of people with baseball bats (aka big stick) getting rushed and not using it properly.
His new introduction of a “anyone should be able to use it effectively” standard is wrong. Because a totally untrained non fighter with ANY weapon is utterly shit. Spears, flails, and actually a lot of the time, swords! These would all be useless to a guy bum rush charging them.
By this standard I’d say the only good weapons ever is knives and guns.
Did You know guns demand training as well? Guns are dangerous because they are always lethal. Give gun to someone who does not know how to use it and they swing it like a club.
may i know what martial arts your background is in.
I think that other than nunchaku's and sticks' momentum and force the only other things to consider are ease of use, and matchups against other weapons.
For ease of use, it is a more challenging weapon to use, so for an untrained person I think most will agree that the stick is a better weapon. However, if we consider trained individuals, I believe that they would be similar in terms of utility. As you stated the impact to your hand wil be reduced. This means it would be harder to be disarmed, but someome trained with a stick/sticks should be able to mitigate this risk in the same way that someone trained in nunchaku have a very low chance of erroneous knockback.
If for some reason you were disarmed, the nunchaku's learning curve is an advantage, because of the opponent's inability to use your weapon.
In terms of match ups, the nunckuck has the advantage in telegraphing powerful moves, but you can thrust with a stick. The ability to beat away other weapons defensively is easier with a stick.
I think that in trained stick vs trained nunchuk, stick would win most of the time, but nunchuck vs metal knuckles or knives or fists is better than stick vs any of those.
I saw someone point out that obtaining control of the opponent's stick is significantly easier than with nunchaku and I think that disarming is very important in a street fight/self defense situation.
If fighters are equal with only difference being weapon my guess is 45-55 odds favoring nunchaku. With Shitiversity being foe odds are 99-1 favoring nunchaku IF it even shows up.
I watched Wushu Engineer's video and it only solidifies Shad's argument IMO.
I think Shad's argument over why the nunchuks are crap is because anything it can do, a simple stick can do the same w/o the limitations of nunchuks (such as getting hit with it if you don't use it properly) as seen in Wushu Engineer's video.
Now, I actually want to learn how to use nunchuks properly to see for myself its effectiveness and then I'll know.
I only have limited experience w/ martial arts w/ arnis being the one that stuck to me because of how simple & applicable it is, at least to me.
How about everything stick can do nunchaku can do as well without limitations of stick?
The whole point of nunchuks is that you can conceal them on your person in a way you can't a stick of the same size. Anything you lose in direct power is a tradeoff you make in favour of concealability.
No they're not a great battlefield weapon. You know what else isn't? A switchblade. Or a derringer that you can fit up your sleeve. They're a tool for an infiltrator, not s professional soldier or an untrained militiaman. People like Shad need to stop analyzing them like they are.
@@vksasdgaming9472 nunchuks don't hit you in the head or nuts if you don't use it properly. Like I said, go watch Wushu Engineer, he said it himself. There's a lot of nunchuk fail compilations than stick fail compilations and that should be proof enough to show the nunchuks suck.
Also, tell me what a nunchuk can do that a stick can't. I'll be waiting. As for concealability, a walking cane cane be a blunt weapon. Hell, a pipe of any material in the same size as a stick can arguably be a better weapon than a nunchuk, and that pipe can be of any size.
@@KartarNighthawk ok, here's the deal. I just want to say for the record that I respect those who prefer the nunchuks as their weapon of choice, and I'm just sharing my point of view here, and explain why I prefer the stick over it. I don't intend to belittle you like that fucker VK does, unless you start calling me names, then it's free game for me.
I will agree that a nunchuk can be more easily concealable than a rigid stick like the ones used in arnis/eskrima. So are small objects like the switchblade & the derringer you mentioned. But these are incomparable because both the switchblade and the derringer have different purposes. The switchblade's purpose is to cut & stab, while the derringer is used to shoot. This would be like comparing a sword to a gun which is not a fair comparison. Shad mentioned this in his video about objectively comparing weapons, so a nunchuk and a stick are a fair comparison. Shad also mentioned in that video that the stick itself is a low-tier weapon compared to other blunt weapons. Of course, if we're going to talk about maces then that is a better weapon than a stick.
I also want to add that a collapsible baton can be concealed just as well as the nunchuk & any of the weapons you mentioned, and have the same function as the stick. Which BTW, is better than a stick can be.
In my humble opinion, w/o adding any insult to this in any way, shape, or form, a stick is easier and safer to use by anyone w/o the disadvantages of a nunchuk such as the risk of hitting yourself if not used properly. This, right here, is why I favor the stick over the nunchuk.
@@sonofsueraf You're missing the point of the switchblade and derringer comparisons a bit. I'm not comparing a switchblade to a stick or a club, I'm saying that a switchblade is to a dagger, and a palm pistol is to a gun, as nunchuks are to sticks. In each case, you trade out lethality for concealability. Another useful comparison would be a swordcane: it is, 100 percent, less useful than a proper sword in a swordfight. But you can hide the sword cane and you can't (easily) hide a sword.
I wouldn't want to use nunchuks in a fight either--but I'm not trained in their use. And yeah, they're absolutely harder to learn the use of than a regular stick. But that applies to all the concealable weapons I've named. You cannot stab or cut with a folding knife as hard as you can with a dagger; you'll break the hinge. You can't shoot someone with a .22 palm pistol and expect them to collapse the way they would from a .45 Magnum. In each case, you are trading off lethality for the ability to hide it and will accordingly have to train more to use it as effectively.
That's where Shad's analysis goes off the rails. He's treating nunchuks as if they're a battlefield weapon, which they were never used as. Comparing them to a stick, or god forbid a mace or warhammer is like comparing a palm pistol to a rifle or switch knife to a dagger or a sword. They're not meant to do the same thing.
Interesting. I guess the memes were what took so long. Happy to be subbed.
3:40. basically nunchuks has more force on the point of impact but loose most of the force after that while sticks you can carry the force and apply the weight of your body into it
*lose
Your shoe strings can be _loose,_ or you can _lose_ your shoes entirely.
Yeah you are back 🔥
Great video but riddle me this;
Two people get into a fight, one with wooden nunchucks and the other with a wooden mace. They have spent roughly the same amount of time training with their choice of weapon.They have roughly the same skill level with their weapon of choice. Neither of them have armour or shields. Both of them have enough room to do any and all moves they could with their weapon of choice.
How does this fight play out?
Dude it's a fucking mace, dude with chucks would get destroyed, very likely anyway
It is possible for the nunchuck dude to win he'd just have to outsmart the mace guy basically
@@milanifitnessofficial A fair answer.
Admittedly, I'd wrote this comment with the belief that Shad was entirely correct but, after having watched a recent video from Skallagrim about the "What's the best weapon" debate and having thought about the dabate around nunchucks more, I find my self disagreeing with Shad. So apologies for having wasted your time with it.
Shad basis his views on whether or not a weapon is good based on how it stacks up against every other weapon in human history (except guns, because obviously guns win for effectiveness) which as Skallagrim has pointed out in a recent video that standard is pointless because not all weapons are designed to fulfill the same roles. From your two videos I can't really tell how you judge weapons to be good or bad, though Shad assumes you judge the effectiveness of weapons based on whether or not it can be a force multiplier.
Having considered the discussion more thoroughly, I personally feel the best way to judge the effectiveness of a weapon is based on how well it did what it was designed to do in its historical context. I'm no expert on Japanese history but, if I'm not mistaken, nunchucks were made during the Japan's feudal period where civilians were banned from owning more conventional weapons like swords. The nunchucks, being based on the design of a common tool in Japan at the time, were made as a workaround and because they were based on a tool there were plenty of people who would've been able to use it as effectively as a knight armed with a longsword and for that, the nunchucks fulfilled it's job.
@@DrifterSaturn Nunchaku is civilian PDW. Simple as that.
A test of weapon should be done with a spar like any other martial arts, you can use a nunchuck while shad use a stick
Again for the God damn millionth time, it's not a battlefield weapon, I would get destroyed in that bout, now can I please stop seeing these comments.
@@milanifitnessofficial hmm no, nunchucks is just a modern version of a flail which is a battlefield weapon used from horseback in ancient chinese dynasty and I actually think that with the skill you show in your video you can actually defeat shad.
@@milanifitnessofficial Actually with your shown skill it would lead to very fast and brutal destruction of his skull. Of course he would have to battle without his props and with his "improved" nunchaku of two wacky unfinished wooden dildos. Or with his twig that almost toppled him over.
@@milanifitnessofficial you finally admit to nunchucks being a bad weapon compared to other weapons. Finally. Thank you for admitting when you are wrong
@@ARC-tr2km And sTIK is useless when compared to real weapons like Rods of Gods.
Nice video, good job. I am a fellow nun-chucker, used them my whole life. I sure wish I knew where I could get my hands on those aluminum chain chucks you flashed a photo of. Please point me in the right direction, I wish I could have a pair of those!
Karatemart.com ! Though check the legality in your region 🤔
This video was just as good as your first one, but just putting a suggestion out there if you ever get the chance you should try to spar with someone that is experienced in knife combat because I think that would definitely show just how effective BOTH weapons can be
Well I think the effectiveness of knives speak for themselves 😂. But thank you!
He should actually Spar with Shad himself. Let’s see how Shad would do with his “mighty” stick vs someone whom actually knows how to use Nunchaku.
Shad is so delusional, he got his Shad Simps just As delusional as he is! They think the Nunchaku is so “useless”, they rather take on someone who is using Nunchaku over someone who has NO WEAPONS! 🤦♂️
Can't wait to see your tutorials. I wish I had more time to train like I use to in my youth.
For anyone interested, I think this is the Wushu Engineer video referred to: ruclips.net/video/SpPs0k4fz_E/видео.html
Intrestingly enough, this video actually confirmd Shad as well, so good luck in pointing toward a video that just tell you that Shad is correct.
@@Xirque666 Are you really that desperate for approval? Try joining local branch of KKK. Might be easier to find mental equals there. Here you just get humiliated and laughed at again and again.
@@vksasdgaming9472 you know, fools laugh because they don't know better kid. And to be honest, I prefere real historical weapons like "broad axe"/"Long axe" or a hewing spear.
They have a nice reach, fast, holds defencive capabilities one on one (no shields won't protect you either) and is essentially a long pointed stick. And you have a weapon that is easier to make, use and that us all over better than chucks. But keep your chucks I don't hate them, I prefere archery (historical) and bladed weapons (dark ages and medieval era)
Soundtrack 6:22 ???
10:22 If you're that close and the opponent is trying to close the gap, might I suggest stiff arming them and chucking at their knee caps. They will be a lot less aggressive on the ground, unable to walk, with shattered knees.
Facts. 👍🏼
I love your editing, I want you to be big on youtube one day.
I want you have a million subscriber! Just do it otherwise i’ll find you ❤️ Good luck my brother. Support from the heart
Can't wait for your Nunckuck tutorials 🔥
There you go.
Where are the videos man :(
I'm sorry dude I really appreciate your support just life dude! I'm trying I promise I will put out more
The back and forth you have going on with Shad is really informative. I'd like to see you do more vids.
Nice response...unfortunately, youtube algorithm hid this video from me until I actually searched for it. Funny thing about the "bouncing off the opponent argument," I think it's something that somebody who spent all of 5 minutes with the nunchaku would use. Nardz video addresses this argument and I haven't really seen anyone make a valid counterpoint. ruclips.net/video/EsW6GkmHaY0/видео.html
By the way, I'd add that you can also generate power with the nunchaku just using minimal wrist movement and your own body (hip movement for horizontal swings etc.)
Actually that "argument" after heavy "research" goes something like this, most likely most coherent summary of nunchuk-buonce:
Because nunchuk is loosely connected by flexible rope or chain it bounces immediately from opponent without causing damage and will recoil with over double the power used to swing it (basic physics) to completely unpredictable direction towards wielder's head that it will hit with tremendous force. That means it never causes damage to whoever it is struck with and always damages the wielder badly. It's idiotic prop "weapon" invented for Enter The Dragon. End of summary.
Strangely enough there is no record of "nunchuk" ever used by anyone anywhere and no-one has been able to construct one either.
@@vksasdgaming9472 😂 oh nooo... grappling range! Now my numbchuckers are useless... or not! 😝ruclips.net/video/JgcC7PR6vck/видео.html
If you were to encounter a master of arnis... Would you stand a chance?
Probably not! Those guys dedicate their LIFE to the art of the stick.
@@milanifitnessofficial what would you say about a tactic of fighting against a nunchaku user to hit the weapon itself as it swings with either a stick or whatever?
@@agotnamato1218 If the nunchuck user is trained properly, the strikes will be too fast too anticipate. On top of that they can come from literally any angle at anytime. If you are able to anticipate a nunchuck that well to intersect it's attack, that my good sir, is a shitty martial artist using the chucks.
2:56, "One stab, flesh wound. Two stabs, dead" What is that from? lol
"Shamwow Guy in Jail" from the deep dark sections of the golden age of RUclips :)
Can u put some moves on your channel to learn?
What would you like to see?
I have to say, you still haven't convinced me but that couldn't stop me from not enjoying the video. I think I'll stick around for a while. Love the friendly rivalry you guys have by the way. It's refreshing when these types of response videos don't turn into all out internet wars.
A war requires both sides to be willing, and a threat. Since Milani wasn't willing to dig into the gutter with grotesque jokes or by screaming at the camera, and Shadi's ballerina spins are no threat... there's no war. He just proved beyond doubt nunchaku aren't useless, putting the, "nunchaku are GARBAGE, GARBAGE," argument into the grave without lowering himself.
More like consecrated the grave, really, since it was already buried by Object History and others, whom Shadi refused to speak with. Even Shadi has come around to endorsing flails, going back on his earlier "expertise" about their inferiority.
@@vanivanov9571 I've watched all three of the videos between the two of them and I still have to agree with Shad. And as far as the internet war I'd have to say that neither of them are "willing" to engage. The relationship between the two has been relatively peaceful and that is due in part to both of them.
@@davinwilliams3130 If you think making grotesque sex jokes and insulting someone for over an hour, screaming at the camera before covering it up with niceties, isn't willingness to engage... I guess you think Shadi inciting his fanbase to harass Nu and the historical longbow facebook group was just a bit of boyish fun. The only reason Shad was more mild is that his target had 5 subscribers, and he got so much flak over previous abuse.
You keep listing your agreement with Shadi, but you never say over what point, and what you think Milani is wrong about. I've met a number of fans who don't seem to remember the points Shadi made, despite watching 3 hours of him talking.
@@vanivanov9571 Honestly, I haven't stated what points I don't agree with because I'm not interested in arguing. In Shads video he detailed the extensive lengths he went to to make sure that he wasn't piling his fan base on top of a smaller creator. I generally agree that nunchucks don't hold up particularly well when compared to other weapons meant for similar situations. And making jokes doesn't constitute willingness to engage in Internet war. Some people just make jokes. Please forgive my improper punctuation, but I could never be bothered to learn it in school.
@@davinwilliams3130 So what he did to Nu and the historians was also a "joke"? Since attacking someone for hours is a joke, so long as you're a good wife-beater and say nice things inbetween, is just a bit of humour. Heck, if his good will is the only thing protecting Milani from his savage fans, who brutally harassed others... then I guess he established a good threat.
But anyway, it's unclear WHAT you consider an internet war, since shouting at someone and insulting them for hours is not...
You constantly state your support for Shadi, and then say you're not interested in the argument? Not beyond ad populum, apparently. But you finally list some attempt at a half-reason.
_" I generally agree that nunchucks don't hold up particularly well when compared to other weapons meant for similar situations."_
What, you mean Shadi's hilariously stupid idea of a baseball bat down your trousers...? Weapon Man had a funny video on that subject.
No, the nunchaku holds a pretty unique spot among weapons and is the best for its use, as agreed by many criminals and street survivors. A couple of survivors responded to Shadi's video about just that. Heck, if Shadi wasn't afraid to talk to Object History, you would've found out how the police as using nunchaku for their unique benefits....
So it seems you were entirely mistaken in your foremost reason for doubting Milani in favour of Shadi.
10:27
I actually really like this point, because it actually shows something that appears alot in medieval martial arts aswell.
In HEMA, a single, simple body adjustment allows for a completely different strike and or block or parry or what have you.
And, as an outsider to alot of this, simply looking in on it out of an interest in history, I've noticed that alot of European and Asian martial arts are actually very similar, more specifically what I'm referring to is weapon based Martial arts, like swordsmanship.
And this is only I think, because of biomechanics.
Our bodies can only do so much, and so the weapons we create are usually limited by that.
So movements and techniques actually end up becoming very similar without even trying, as does weapon development, like the case of the European long sword, and the Japanese katana.
Anyway, just an observation I've made.
Thx for making the response
me, a gun person, knowing dang well ill never pick up any melee other than a karambit: interesting
Can you disable someone with gun or karambit without causing lethally dangerous injuries in process?
@@vksasdgaming9472 no, thats the point, if force is actually justified, then to heck with how the other dude turns out, i wanna keep all my teeth
@@NotAgentAJ I am quite certain that putting bullet into someone who drunkenly waved his fist at you does not earn you any favor from law enforcement. Neither does slashing their throat.Might earn some points as expendable goon meant to cause violent distraction.
@@vksasdgaming9472 I said "if force is actually justified" if some drunk yells at me, that is not justifiable, someone pulling a knife on me in an alleyway might be, depending on the situation, in which case i would take just about anything other then 2 sticks tied together
@@NotAgentAJ So you'd rather lose your teeth to drunkard's fist. Not much degrees in your thinking. It is dangerous path you are walking, son. I guess you want to be in prison for killing someone in minor altercation not needing lethal force. Police do not shoot first with guns.
I know you’re probably busy with life but I would like to see more videos like tutorials, like how to strike with nunchucks properly.
I am trying dude please stay tuned, just my stupid hard drive is full and it's making editing annoying, on top of that I prefer to film my videos from now on with partners to demonstrate on (which can be hard to find), because I hate just talking to a camera instead of live demonstration. Makes me look like a fraud, even though I'm sure the majority of the internet already thinks that of me.
I made a video too adding to u and to Shad. I am more to shad side but you do have vaild points. I made a video long ago about this replying to Shadversity. Do u want to collaborate?
Im disappointed in shadiversity's subs you earned a subscribe from us. One point shad did point out if i remember right is nunchucks need training where a simple stick doesn't. Also isn't i possible with facing a stick welding attacker the strike for the middle of your weapon which could disarm you. Shad also looks at a weapon in a battle sense also the ease of use. nunchucks really lose all there power against an armored target where a stick you can strike and poke. ill give you this impressive skills with them. your approaching this as an expert of the weapon shad is approaching as a novice. both of you are right at the same time. keep up the good work sorry more shadiversity people didn't sub.
Nunchaku needs less than a week of training. I've heard people suggest absurdities like the flail requires an apprenticeship to learn... when it was a tool used by farmers around the world. You can learn it in hours, if you have to. And of course it's easy to use, since 90% of the world was using them for thousands of years. People who have that much trouble with nunchaku can't be trusted with axes, either.
_"Also isn't i possible with facing a stick welding attacker the strike for the middle of your weapon which could disarm you"_
You mean striking at the chain/cord of the nunchaku? That's work work. At best, you'll entangle your club, and that situation is equal at best.
Armour: Umm... you're seriously underarmed, if you only have a stick to go against an armoured warrior. The flail/nunchaku is slightly better, in that mechanical advantage gives it a very high PSI strike. You can see Weapon Man's videos for examples. Thrusting with a baton is absurdly ineffective, no police manual I know of recommends thrusting.
So largely, Shadi is very incorrect, especially in his original claim that nunchaku are, "GARBAGE! GARBAGE!" Throwing them on the ground.
Actually Shitiversity approached nunchaku using idiom "kuin piru lukisi Raamattua". That means in deliberately misleading manner ignoring things like context, evolution and actual facts just to support his "arguments" which had already been decided. Then he just added idiotic lies and slander to mix. True novice has his mind open and ready to possibilities - he does not know anything so he must study them.
Wild that he thinks any weapon needs no training. They all do, that’s why people train at all. Because it’s necessary
A weapon needing more training to use doesn't intrinsically make it worse. A halberd requires more training than a spear, which is why it's a good weapon for a professional soldier, and a bad one for a weekend warrior militiaman. Same principle applies here. I'm not handing out nunchuks to my peasant levy, but there no reason not to give them to my infiltrators.
This idea that a stick doesn't need training is foolish. To just swing it - sure. To actually know how to use it as a weapon - nope. Just look at him in this video - he wields a short stick with way more skill than someone who just picks one up and starts swinging it like a baseball bat. People train for years, decades even to get better with the use of a staff. Compared to nunchuks, sure, a stick is easier to wield. But if Shad thinks he is hitting anyone with that flailing, wild swing... he is out of his mind. It is telegraphed from a mile away and I would love to see him go up against the man in this video with a set of chucks. Shad would find out very quickly that he would get smoked whether he had a sword, stick or spear.
When you talk about his ballerina spinning you are referring to when he was demonstrating MAX power. He has shown that he can strike with a high level of control many other times
Yeah try saying that to any professional martial artist. You can strike at MAX power with good form, that's the whole point of martial arts.
@@milanifitnessofficialthe point of him striking like that was just because it was easy to replicate with the stick so that the comparison would be fair. It's not supposed to be a practical strike, it's just for the experiment
@@Noah_1823 If his claim was that nunchucks weren't weapons and that they couldn't be used for self defense, then why would he demonstrate a technique that he wouldn't use for self defense?
That kinda seems like he was deliberately exaggerating the effectiveness of the stick in comparison to the chucks.
@@user-qt8ko4gm2k I see where you're coming from, but for that specific part of the video, his claim wasn't anything as holistic as that. All he was claiming was specifically that nunchucks don't hit any harder than a stick. To test that, he used an impractical technique where he followed through with his strike. You wouldn't use this in real life because it's too slow, however for the purpose of the test, it was the right choice because it can be replicated with both weapons, and it likely imparts more force than a normal nunchuck strike anyway
Only one way to solve this! Weapons sparring!
Already done by others. No clear advantage to either when wielders are equally skilled. Kind of predictable result.
@@vksasdgaming9472 who cares who wins! I just want a video of them fighting in person! Actual warriors not key board warriors!
Great Vid!
Unfortunately hidden by the RUclips algorithm, this needs and deserves a lot more views
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The biggest problem i find with this whole thing is Shad's "Objective" scale when it comes to weapons, and to an extent, martial arts*
by his scale, due to ease of training the WW2 battle rifle would come on top of a Modern 202X advanced systems assault rifle cause one's easier to learn
*especially with his blatant disregard for non-European "thinking" when it comes to these
Ease of use isn't the issue here. His video was an entire hour and twenty minutes long. Watch the whole thing, he explains it much better than what you see here.
@@aubreyhuff46 I watched all three (i know of)
Shad's standard just doesn't hold up and treats the nunchuck as a weapon for fighting it was never made for.
Make that 4
That highfaluten rifle is no good sonny, you need yous a good ol stick!
Bruce Lee was actually very advanced in every form of combat but he stuck to his favorites more
i had a friend who said nunchucks is not realistic and i immediately knew he watched shads videos. I told him thats not true and most of the things shad said was bullshit. So we decided to have a sparring match after lockdown
That should be fun!
@@nunchuckman4253 im gonna troll him like how bruce lee trolled the gangsters in the way of the dragon
@@raiderp4l473 haha. Good flick
@@raiderp4l473 Don't troll, because that bites your rear. Just focus on bashing some sense to his thick skull.
@@vksasdgaming9472 yeah you are right, but should i use wooden nunchucks or foam? cuz he is gonna use a wooden stick so should i use wooden nunchucks?
I did martial arts when I was a kid, didn't continue the artform because of a crippling injury. Your content is very engaging to watch, I really enjoyed the back and forth between you and the other content creators here. I'm excited to see something else come out of this channel. It's pretty cool stuff.
U should had address his claim that the nunchucks require double the amount of then any other weapon also u should had addressed anybody could use nunchucks if they use em correctly or how are they were intended
Actually Shitiversity claimed nunchaku demands ten times as much practice to be proficient. Not two - ten. Even more ludicrous claim.
@@vksasdgaming9472 then he should address it for sure
bro please upload lessons with nunhuk
Yeah you do a really good job at misrepresenting his arguments, You seem to think he's saying they're completely useless as weapons. But he's said multiple times that they're not useless, they're just one of the worst picks you could choose. You being proficient at using them doesn't make them good, for example you could spend half the time training to learn pretty much any other weapon and you would be far deadlier of an opponent. You shouldn't be trying to demonstrate why nunchucks are good you should be trying to prove why nunchucks are better than other weapons.
How about this: both you and shad get 6 months to train someone who has no prior training. You train them to fight with nunchucks and he trains them to fight with a stick. They then 1v1 each other. Then we can see if whether or not it is worth turning a stick into a pair of nunchucks.
That'd be a stupid waste of time considering how shad doesn't know how to fight, and also considering that his original point was that chucks weren't even weapons and that they couldn't be used for self defense.
Have you seen footage of shad fencing? He's not the right person to train anybody on anything.
Why did you say flimsy sword, since when are they flimsy, an d a kill shot is not a KO shot
Great video.
Great video, i really like the part where you broke the knife.
Didn't expect to!
I don't get it. Why there was a knif and not a stick of similar length and mass?
or why not versus an spear to change the range advantage?
Physic Nerd here i can elaborate bv using some averages. ive come up with these numbers to show the difference in forces being applied. Please keep in mind that the mass of the object matters far more than the acceleration when it comes to force.
311.375 Newtons = Average punch with no training.
351.40 Newtons = Nunchunk strike.
5782.6886 Newtons = Pro heavy weight boxers punch.
35585.776 Newtons = MLB pro player swinging a bat.
2174811.355574 Newtons = 80 Mph head on collision car crash.
The take away is that because you cant lean your body weight into the nunchunk and its only using the mass on the end of the chain you cant generate large forces, Since mass is weighted much more favorably in this equation. Will nunchunks hurt? Absolutely. Can they knock someone unconscious, unless they have a glass chin and any external force can knock them out, unlikely. A average person cant take a heavy weight boxers punch without going limp, but they can a average punch or strike, So the knockout point is somewhere between those two for the average person, Against a pro boxer, nunchucks are worthless, you might make him laugh at best and at worst just piss him off.
This is not a hateful or disparaging message i just find this intresting from a math perspective. Nunchucks are cool, flashy and i love watching people use them.
Old-fashioned trickery with misleading numbers. Did you know that .22LR bullet has less kinetic energy than average punch yet they have killed more people than any other bullet.
@@vksasdgaming9472 thats not even remotely true. A quick Google search debunked that claim. Not to mention it only seems connected homicides which alone disproves the "any other bullet" claim cause combat soldier has ever carried a .22lr. Yes .22lr is better than nothing and it may have a tendency to kill injured targets 3 days later, but any other cartridge would be more effective at stopping an attack. So the one actually being misleading here, is you.
@@MegaBoby111 Maybe wrong about people killed. Not wrong about energy delivered. Why MMA fighters or any other combat athletes just don't shoot each other with pistols? It is safer as energies being delivered are so much smaller.
@@vksasdgaming9472 not exactly misleading perhaps I should have used pound force instead of newton's for the calculation but it's easy enough to convert, piercing force and blunt forces are applied differently, if the object is small enough and fast enough it can pierce the skin but a nunchuck is not breaking the speed of sound, so it's completely irrelevant.
Most of the points brought up by (I assume your name is Cooper based on what was said in the beginning) are very interesting. Imperfect but interesting. I must also say that demo in breaking the red oak knife by accident is genuinely impressive. However, I will say I STRONGLY disagree with the whole "we shouldn't throw weapons on the ground because it disrespects the culture" thing. The example given of a student being unable to carry the full weight of a katana being just ground for the sensei to scold him is disgusting. Lord forbid the sensei ensure the student can carry the thing first and gaslight the student over his (the teacher's) short sightedness. The sad part is it's not JUST in martial arts this occurs, but in all aspects of Japan's society. From having everyone be conditioned to be exactly the same and empathizing success over the pursuit of personal joy, it's no wonder that suicide rates are high and birth-rates are so extremely low in Japan right now. Modern youth cannot properly develop in this kind of mentality and cultural norms do not justify it. The only reason this mentality exists in Japan at all is because the nation wants to be bigger than it (honestly) has any right to be. Lot of movies from Japan suggest they view themselves as the center of the world and intend to prove the impossible because of it. At a social cost. If Japan doesn't wisen up, it'll someday be gone.
Do yourself a favor Cooper, don't be sucked into that subconscious desire Japan has to prove it's the best when it is not. I'm not saying we ought to disrespect Japan on purpose, but ALWAYS examine the motives behind a tradition. While this topic is not at all involved in faith, I think Jesus Christ said it best "He answered them, “And why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? For God said, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Whoever speaks evil of father or mother must surely die.’ But you say that whoever tells father or mother, ‘Whatever support you might have had from me is given to God,’ then that person need not honor the father. So, for the sake of your tradition, you make void the word of God." (Matthew 15:3-6 KJV). A tradition or item is NOT more important than love for your fellow man. A lesson modern Japan is in SORE need of. God bless you and looking forward to seeing more content from you.
Found you because of Shad! I'm subscribing, and I hope you make more.
"Not everything has to be a Claymore." Love that line.
XD "This is not pseudo science. This is base level physics." Help! I'm dying. XD
O.O That strike on the knife. Damn Son! Nice job!
I am glad I found your channel through Shad. You are definitely the best thing I got out of Shad's, frankly, ridiculous bashing on this weapon.
And had the knife had the same reach as the chuchs, your friend would have died
@@Xirque666 Who are you talking to
@@DeathnoteBB He is literally correct. Maybe Something longer than a Kitchen Knive would have made a good presentation
@@lucjeb9254 Okay?
I was scrolling for videos and this was in my recommended. Oh boy, here we go again. On wards brothers and sisters! Onwards to the storm! Onwards through the fires and hail! Press on, for today we watch as the war is rekindled once more! The flames rises once more and we stand before it, popcorn and drinks at the ready to view the battle that rages before us! Watch on! Watch on! Watch on for the glory of the Algorithm!
Love you milani, good sport, and glad to have another voice contributing to the loose online community of martial arts and weapons
I have never actually seen nunchucks in actual sparring before, so i thought they were basically useless.
I think i might buy a pair now! That shit's fuckin scary!
Edit: Hey shad fans, i know shad (according to you guys) said "stick better genrally because of defense ".
I wanna point out that nobody even cares because why would you? Shad was still wrong about most everything he said, demonstrated by this video, and honestly that's a bad take anyways.
Weapons are made for specific purposes, and nunchucks excell at what they're made for. It's pedantic and weird to say that a stick is better than nunchucks because it has defense.
I don’t know if you noticed, but it's awfully easy to hit somebody in the head with nunchucks, and it's not easy to know where your opponent is going to hit at any given point in time. AND nunchucks can hit you past your guard because they flop around.
Please, just think twice about harassing somebody on the internet because you don’t like their jointed sticks.
Very well said! Thank you for your support it doesn't go unnoticed!
I've seen yours and the Shad videos on this topic. I have to say your content and real world rationale and demonstration of technique gives more "bang for the buck"! Keep up the good work. I hope to see more videos!
yeah. shad thinks everything that isn't a fucking long sword is completely useless.
@@nicholasjonas2505 did you even watch any of Shad's video? His weapon of choice is a spear. Next is bow, and he even regard shield to be more useful than sword. He only think nunchuck is garbage, even a stick is better than the nunchuck.
@@looyoo7608 first off, it was an exageration. Second off, no, a stick is not as usefull as a nunchuck.
You cannot conceal a stick nearly as easily as a nunchuck. It gives twice the reach of a baton with the same amount of carry space because it folds over itself.
It's meant to be a deployable, concealed self defense weapon for civilians. Not a weapon of war.
You can't conceal a spear, you can't conceal a sword, you can't conceal a mace, pick, or axe.
If you walk into a high security area with a "walking stick" the guards are gonna stop you. Humans are not that dumb.
Cane swords existed. Cane fighting existed. Guards would have known that.
This leaves you realisticly with 4-5 options.
Knife, baton, tonfa, kama and nunchuck.
Nunchuck has the highest reach out of all of them.
@@nicholasjonas2505 So carrying 20-40 knives in a belt, "Concealed", is not as useful as a Nunchuck? I am more worries about 10 knives thrown at me than the Nunchucks anyday.
@@simounobrien9096 i can understand concealing 3 knifes at most. 40 is unpracticle.
In a MELEE fight, nunchucks have more reach than a baton, kama, or a knife. Often, the weapon with the longest reach wins.
While you can throw knifes, that's a pretty high risk/little reward situation. Knifes don't instant kill as shown in media, you can miss, and they can throw it back at you.
Anything is better than nothing, and anybody with sane mind who is not confident in his skill with a weapon will not take it unless he has to. Hearing both sides of this debate, I lean toward the universal answer: everything is subjective and situational. Give an idiot a pair of nunchucks and he will hurt himself just as much as with other weapons, I seen some ridiculous stuff ppl have done to themselves (my young self included) using swords, axes, staves, just about anything.
Give a child a stick he will hurt himself way less than if he had nunchucks mate. Common sense. Get over the phase of nunchucks. They may be cool and flashy but conpared to most if not all other weapons. It’s garbage mate
Good video and followup.
well i mean. that fight against the knife dude wasn't really fair or realistic imho. he had no idea of what he was doing and was outranged... i mean. try that again but the knife guy has the INTENT to stab you. he will just run at you and go stabby stabby stabby. you will get maybe one blow and then he is in grappling range, then chucks pretty useless and you are dead. that's what i always disliked about martial arts. there is so many of this bullshit "what can you do against an attacker with a knife". and then they show some bullcrap how they disarm them while the attacker does everything to be disarmed standing there like your target dummies but they don't attack. this shit doesn't work like that in real life. and tbh i hate and despise that. it's stupid dangerous and potentially deadly advice and stupid to even think of trying that. YOU ONLY FIGHT IF YOU CAN'T RUN AND IT'S YOUR LAST AND ONLY OPTION.
if someone really has intend to stab you he will come at you and you will most likely not even know that he has a knife until it's deep inside your flesh. but even if you really would end up in a situation where the guy stands in front of you with his knife and you with your chucks. do you think they dance around like that as if they were fencing? if the opponent wants to kill you he will run into your chucks with the one arm and stab with the other. if you don't manage to knock him out cold with that one maybe two blows you can land then you are dead dude. please stay realistic.
A surprise short range attack is useless whatever weapon you have the knife is superior to that regardless if you open carry a sword, conceal a gun etc. Technique is still important, and a struggle to stop the stabs and slices with adrenaline running is possible if you're an experienced knife fighter vs the stabby bum rusher. You forget that you can turn over someone even bigger than you and turn them on their backs...it's called using force to throw them off balance when using the ground with your feet and legs. The reason you don't see that with humble fighters and not killers is because they can block that cause they're experienced fighters. Again you argue that the knifefighter in this video didn't know what he was doing. But you're recommending a bum rush stabby stabby technique which experienced knife fighters don't do. But I do agree a surprise peripheral attack might be effective but you risk being grabbed and you'd have to pray if that guy is still alive that he doesn't seek vengeance on you and does a reprisal. So martial arts isn't all that bullshit.
Anyway, for someone that telegraphs their knife attack at a short but striking distance, or when the knife kill shot wasn't successful and both men are back on their feet or the knife attacker was pushed away would you like to demonstrate bum rushing into an oncoming stick or steel coming at you at full speed and force won't stun you? Ever thought about using footwork like backing up and then striking and stepping at the side and different angles so their centerline will miss? Or kicking or kneeing them for distance. I'm pretty sure an experienced swordfighter with better footwork and technique will have an advantage over one that bumrushes and also uses a sword. Again if someone bumrushes you real quick you can use some judo if you're good at it to throw them off balance and trip them while struggle for the knife or sprawl to stop the takedown.
Same with knife fighting. Don't be afraid with adrenaline running when stabbed or sliced, but what about impact weapons do they stop the person from attacking? You can block or parry their momentum. Technique is actually valuable. I mean it's all speculation. At least milani fitness does admit it isn't a weapon for every weapon, or admit that there's no data of the nunchuk vs knife because it's rare. But imagine this. Imagine there are several knife fighters, would you carry a knife to handle 3-4 people or the nunchuks swinging it horizontally at multiple targets or knifing multiple targets? Of course the smarter thing to do is run, but what if you run into a dead end wall?
We're talking about people that get into altercations and the smarter fighter will distance himself.
@UCZWNfc3z4EB6h7WBGWkCjCQ my point was just that it's an absolutely arbitrary scenario and adds absolutely nothing to the discussion. i was just thinking from the perspective of the knife wielder and how i would approach IF i would actually be in a fight like that with the intent to kill. fuck that one hit i might take while i go in with my empty hand and arm first. but then i'm in stabbing range. the guys entire stance is kinda wrong. who would have the knife in the leading hand so it can be knocked away? it's not a sword with any meaningful range. you would keep your free hand towards the opponent and the knife behind.
the point of his video and a lot of others was if nunchucks are a dumb weapon or not and if or if not nunchucks are worse than other weapons. so if you do a sparing to proof a point here it should be at least realistic because as it is done here it means absolutely nothing.
it's just a syndrome that a lot of martial artists suffer. they forget that their shit often only works against another martial artist.
you used a knife to demonstrate a mid-range fight, and the knife is much more useful against a closer fight (it would be preferable to use a weapon more equivalent to a sword or a stick), not to mention that the person you were fighting didn't even try defend his head with his arms or something.
and probably an inexperienced person would try to defend his head and try to take the nunchacku with the hands
@@kauaaw_a It will also result in broken hands. Really smart move to bring frail and very sensitive spot towards something which will shatter it to tiny pieces. Sorry son, but your "academic" theory debunks itself very efficiently.
@@vksasdgaming9472 you didnt read my comment? i said an inexperienced person would do that, because the matter is a fight with an inexperienced person against one with experience.
where i said i'm an academic lol? you're lazy enough not to read a whole comment and you mean that you have debunked something? pathetic
Maybe it helps to think of nunchucks as half-a-projectile weapon. A melee range slingshot you don't have to reload.
A melee range slingshot makes no tactical sense. A slingshots supposed to give you range, if you're in melee you use a melee focused weapon. You're overanalysing it
Got into this little back and forth debate recently. Glad that I came in now to see this upload so early! Seeing both sides, I think you both make really good points. I definitely wouldn't go for nunchaku as my first choice for self-defence, because as Shad said, it's very easy to injure yourself. However, as you've pointed out, they can pack a punch and are easy to conceal if you've trained with them well. Shad argued that you can conceal a stick easily, but because that does not fold, it's definitely not the same. If I was trying to hide a weapon, I'd have a much easier time hiding nunchaku than I would hiding a sai of the same length. And on the topic of injuring yourself...You can definitely hurt yourself with a "stick", although the risk is lower compared to nunchaku. Had a guy in my karate class swing his bo staff really hard with both hands closer to one end. The shorter end closer to him struck him in the gut and left a really nasty bruise. He wasn't incompetent by any means, just got too reckless.
I think nunchaku are past their prime now. They were definitely useful at a time where farmers needed to fight with whatever they had, while also not being obvious. Now, without these restrictions, there are definitely better options than nunchaku. But this does not make them trash.
By this logic, all weapons that are not firearms are "garbage". These weapons were created to best suit the era and circumstances they were made in. Swords are not "garbage" just because they pale in comparison to firearms in terms of range and lethality.
Debate aside and to end this on a positive note, looking forward to see more of your content! I quit karate roughly 4 years ago to focus on art, but I still have my bo and sais in the closet. Seeing these videos makes me miss my old dojo...It would be nice to practice again!
Several youtubers have proven that self-injury idea was laughable. Even maximal rebound caused intentionally won't bruise your hand. Shadi claimed to have experience, but looked like a stunned fish in the second video, when he found you could push with a nunchaku... because he's never hit a target for as much as an hour before those videos, despite his empty boasts about experience. That's why he's the only person to feel the need to use a helmet to demonstrate nunchaku.
Everyone I know learned nunchaku within a week. I've heard of some people so incompetent they hit themselves in the head... but I wouldn't trust them with a wood axe or a sharp kitchen knife, either, much less a sword or a military flail. They're urbanites, men without any physical skill.
_"Had a guy in my karate class swing his bo staff really hard with both hands closer to one end. The shorter end closer to him struck him in the gut and left a really nasty bruise. He wasn't incompetent by any means, just got too reckless."_
Training accidents do happen, with all weapons. You play with knives, you will get cut. The idea nunchaku are far more dangerous, though, is rubbish that stems from all the people trying to do flashy tricks with them....
_"I think nunchaku are past their prime now. They were definitely useful at a time where farmers needed to fight with whatever they had, while also not being obvious."_
Not so. They're actually more in their prime now than in any other era, since criminals find them very useful to ambush people with. Check out Object History's video, where he goes into details on how the police are using them in various places.
_"By this logic, all weapons that are not firearms are "garbage". These weapons were created to best suit the era and circumstances they were made in. Swords are not "garbage" just because they pale in comparison to firearms in terms of range and lethality."_
Consider the 21 foot rule. A gun is not always the best weapon. Still, it does demonstrate how faulty Shadi's logic was.
@@vanivanov9571 Looks like there was a misunderstanding. To clarify, I didn't mean that nunchaku were extremely dangerous to the user. They definitely aren't. I'm saying that it's easy to hit yourself with them. I've used them before, and with how they swing around, it's very easy to hit yourself. The problem however, isn't the pain of the rebound (it doesn't hurt much honestly) it's trying to catch the bloody thing from behind you. The way Milani demonstrates it here is flawless, I'm seriously in awe. But I can tell you that it's much harder than it looks to catch that thing under your arm after you swing it back. If you miss the catch, once it bounces off your shoulder, you're left in a really awkward position. This isn't an issue if you've mastered it, but for amateurs, there is definitely a greater chance of fumbling about with it compared to other weapons. In short, if you haven't mastered them, you'll find much better luck with a simpler weapon. Nunchaku aren't for everyone. That's not to insult them, it's just a fact.
On the matter of being past their prime, I say that because nowadays if someone really wanted to defend themselves on the street, they would have many options to choose from. The strength of the nunchaku I think comes from how easy it is to conceal and how during its time, it doubled as a farming tool. Because people nowadays don't need to convert farming tools into weapons, the choices they have are greater and you can pick something much easier to use if you dont have the co-ordination for nunchaku. That said, if someone finds nunchaku works for them, by all means they should go ahead and use what they're comfortable with.
And yes, my point on firearms was to comment on how shad was focusing so much on power output. Of course non-firearm weapons have their advantages in modern day, especially if you dont want to outright kill someone or seriously injure them.
@@waddledeeart6019 Just felt I needed to state that, since many people would take your statement to the extreme Shadi meant it, where he joked about being more likely to disable yourself than your opponent.
You can certainly get nicked doing the various stuff many schools teach, with nunchaku. But using it like a normal flail, it is quite simple, same as other flails. Todd and Matt did a video where some people tried out flails for the first time in their lives... and they did a pretty good job in their sparring.
There are a lot of options, but nunchaku are the best at giving reach, force, and concealability in a melee package (and most crimes happen within 21 feet). It's also less-lethal force, which is handy to avoid legal trouble. That's why it's very popular with criminals, and certain defenders.
@@vanivanov9571 No worries, this debate has gotten so heated that I think anyone who has been here for a while is pretty on edge. Thankfully, I just got here...Months of this back and forth would be exhausting to be in. I feel like even with long hours of nunchaku practice though, you wouldn't really nick yourself as a beginner? I've only ever seen beginners use the foam training ones. Pretty sure once someone moves onto wooden or steel nunchaku after practicing with foam, the chances of that are much lower.
As for how popular it is on the street, I wouldn't know. I've never seen or heard of them used like that, but I'm sure it happens. They are pretty flexible. (I'd still much rather use a bo staff though, nunchaku drove me insane with the catching behind my back. Would be willing to try again for fun, but unlikely that I'd get around to it.)
@@neoaliphant Okay. And...? Power output is important obviously, but it's not the sole deciding factor in a weapon's usefulness. I wasn't keen on shad's video for that reason. He makes a few good points, but he focused heavily on power output comparison when calling nunchaku "garbage".
Again, if we go by his words and compare weapons to each other in this way...Then by that logic, focusing solely on how easy they are to use and their raw power, wouldn't that make everything that is not a firearm "garbage"?? It's a flawed comparison.
Nicely done =)
10:07 I think in this scenario, you can hold the nunchucks by the cord/chain for shorter range strikes when your opponent is constantly closing in on you and you find it hard to distance yourself from them. This striking technique was demonstrated by Nardz in his own response vid to Shad.
Having heard both sides of this Nunchucks debate saga, I'm leaning more towards Nunchucks being effective weapons and not as bad as a lot of people try to say they are.
Anyways, great video! Looking forward to seeing more from this channel! 👍
Thanks for the feedback Wiker! Yes for very close combat, the cord technique nards had demonstrated is definitely not a bad idea! Love his video and this comment.
I think I might add that the use of the 'Bababooey' meme in this vid is quite excessive, but maybe that's just me. Lol. 😅
@@Wikerstervolski bababooey
For closer range strikes (handshake distance) what about swinging the nunchucks without extending the arms and maintaining a 90 degree angle on the elbow/arm while the wrist don't follow through with the strike?
It would be like holding the nunchucks in position close to the body and let the swing or centrifugal (?) force do the work?
Great video! I honestly think Shad became too close minded in his way of thinking. I was a great fan of his for years, but his recent videos just cringed me out of there...
That chain connecting those nunchucks of yours look like they might be able to hold back a stick if you are fast and dexterous enough. might even be able to deflect then counterattack. This is only something an inexperienced blockhead (myself) with no knowledge with nunchucks what so ever can think of.
you feel a lot like a younger paul harrel but for martial arts content. Love it
Brilliant video.
At 4:38 I feel like we're really getting to the heart of this debate. 😏
Anyone even care what that guy even says…. great video!!!
Also kid if you're going to use the real nunchucks you might as well use a real knife, just use one that has been blunted for training
Nice sparring there. Shad doesn’t want a fair debate as we both know. The way he responded to you gave you no chance to respond with the larger audience (his) and he knew that. And all that childish crap… embarrassing. Look forward to your martial arts videos.
Thank you very much for the feedback! Hope to see more from your channel!
He shows so many traits of NPD that he could work as textbook example. With Dunning-Kruger effect he works equally well. Kind of sad if it were not as annoying.
Did you even watch Shad's response video? He asked Melani if he could make a response to his video and Melani accepted. Shad still didn't want to post the video because of the massive difference in their audiences' sizes. Melani was wondering where the video was and he told Shad that he wanted him to make the response. Shad's response was made not only with Melani's consent, but with his encouragement to do so.
@@arkhamasylum8972 If you're going to speak for me, at least spell my name right. Just because I consent to a response does not mean it's very 'professional' to make some of the comments he did, keep in mind Shadiversity actually sent me a private link to a first edit of the video and it contained even more slander than the official one. It was only after I explained how extreme it was to the editor that it was changed(kind of regret doing that now).
@@milanifitnessofficial I wasn't speaking for anyone. I was giving context to a situation. Slander like what? Was he telling lies about you? That's slander. Was it the virgin stuff? He wasn't being serious and was more of a reference to his time when he trained with nunchucks and was minor self-loathing and an attack on the weapon if anything. Also your comment about my spelling mistake was unnecessary and has nothing to do with what I was talking about. Yeah, I spelled you name wrong. Big deal.
I brought the Stinger Whip up as an example of a modern weapon of the same design concept to Shad *myself billions* of times over in order to show that even if he *was* in fact right about the Nunchaku not hitting as hard as a stick for the same effort, that'd mean they're actually *better* than a stick as a *non-lethal* self-defense weapon, which, if he *was* right, would've been what they were *meant* for; and *every time* , he's just flat out *ignored* it; at this point, the only reason I stay subscribed to him is so whenever he makes a video like that, which he *also* did with the double-headed battle-axe, I can show it to a RUclipsr like Skallagrim, Metatron, or yourself, so that they can present a much more *rational, open minded counter* to Shad's bullshit.
PS: Skallagrim made his *own* Nunchaku video a couple days ago, and linked *this* video as one of his sources, as well as some Nunchaku videos the Weaponism channel did, and addressed quite a few of Shad's bullshit arguments; I recommend you give it a watch
Also, to quote Rokurou Rangetsu in one of the victory cutscenes in Tales of Berseria, "Even a *short* weapon is effective *up close* " ; and to quote Eleanor in that same victory cutscene, "And *training* can help it get *even closer* ".
It is above all that the quality of a weapon is not determined by the damage it causes, but rather by its incapacitating power (particularly concerning non-lethal weapons...), and that this must involve other criteria such as the maneuverability, skills or the context of use. posing the problem in terms of "damage" may work in video games, but not in the real world of melee weapons...
@@traditionalintegralmartial9629 that's *exactly* what I was saying in my *main* comment.
Do not support his channel. You can be certain that new lows are set with regular pace.
@@vksasdgaming9472 like I said, the *only* reason I stay subscribed to Shad is so whenever he puts a video like those out, I can show it to someone like Skallagrim or Metatron so they can present a much more *rational* case.
The qualitiy of discussion really decreased a lot from the first to this video.
The first one was way more analytical and presented a good case for the nunchuck. But this one feels more bitter and agressive with less substance and more memes.
Bitter, little substance, filled with memes? Isn’t that just shads content anyway?
@@outsideiskrrtinsideihurt699 i see no bitterness with shad
@@m0-m0597Look at his content and you see tantruming manchild.
7:00
You gotta get that guy some proper gear, he's gonna get a broken nose. 😂
Something I do notice in this exchange though that even with this fella's clear hesitance likely due to proper protection, he does still manage to make contact or near contact with you, so he does close the distance very quickly even with you swinging at him.
Which, I mean, if you know anything about modern self defense, you'll know one of the biggest talking points is always the guy with the knife will always close the distance to the guy with the gun.
So im not at all surprised that he's still able to hit you, or at least get close.
People who have trained on and used guns as apart of their jobs for years will tell you that a guy with a knife can and WILL close that distance quickly and get himself in stabbing range.
Guns are just, patently better than most ancient weapons.
At least modern guns.
And that's why I use this example.
Because if a gun can have it's distance closed so quickly, and it has infinitely more range than the nunchucks, obviously a guy with a knife is going to close the distance to someone with nunchucks.
Moreover the gun and the nunchuk are actually comparable for this instance, no, not in their effectiveness, obviously one is better, but in that both create range between you and your attacker. Both create a sense of unease on approach.
Both are intimidating. Both may cause hesitation.
And both, similarly, have issues with closing the distance, in that someone determined enough to do so, will almost always reach you before you can reach them, or at least at the same time as you're able to.
Very vool video dude! :D
Though I do have other criticisms, but I get the feeling it may not matter to you.
Because I don't have experience using nunchucks, you may even discount my comparisons earlier.
Though I do in fact have experience using firearms. I've been doing that on and off on various ranges since I was about 12 years old.
It's really fun.
Anyway, I only say this because even in this video you see to still hold to this idea that experience discounts observation.
Which in some cases, experience might discount observation.
But let me ask you something.
If I was to say the sky was purple, would you believe me?
Probably not. Why?
Well because you can look outside and see the sky is blue and not purple.
And so can I.
Will that observation become invalid without any extensive knowledge of why the sky is blue, or will the sky simply just always be blue?
Experience is valuable, but it isn't everything.
Great comment! Those chucks are very unharmful! But yeah a direct hit on the nose would probably hurt a bit 🤣
@@milanifitnessofficial yeah it didn't occur to me that you might've been using foam ones in that shot, and that's because I was actually very tired when I wrote this, I'm surprised it's as coherent as it is.
🤣
Ah, night time jobs, they'll do that to ya.
0/10 neither side used the sanjiegun (Just joking, great videos)
Very good level of real combat nunchaku in demonstration, this is rare. Even if I think there is still a way to be more sober while being just as effective... So, obviously you can't compare the nunchaku with the stick, the characteristics are not the same and the two weapons don't match each other. not use in the same way, the nunchaku is a very singular weapon which has its own advantages and weaknesses (which can be overcome with an adapted footwork), some simply do not understand it and think "Oh, that sucks", so trivial .. .This is a PERSONAL melee weapon, not designed for the battlefield, so pls stop comparing it with those weapons. The nunchaku has its own advantages, I don't want to elaborate (or feed the pigs too much), but it has to do with its velocity and the exploitation of its inclination on certain angles of attack. Of course, you can't see it if you don't practice it seriously... so, commentator puffed up with certainties, the rule is the same for everything : if you don't master a subject by practice, it's better to keep your mouth shut ...
After watching videos from both sides, I have some thoughts.
Nunchucks can be useful in the right hands. That spar at 7:00 show that. But it requires training to use.
Stick is stick. Stick is simple. Stick anyone can use, and doesn't need the 16 years to be as good as you with nunchucks.
If there was a zombie apocalypse outside, and I had to to take Only one weapon, and my choices were nunchucks and stick, I'll take stick.
Nunchucks require training. Stick does not.
This whole thing is like Batman Vs Superman. If batman had the time to prepare, yes he can win. But in an on the stop fight, it's obvious who will win.
Thank you!
The only beauty of nunchuck I could think of is probably its dedication required to master. But from a practical perspective, it is so much worse than any other weapon for any purpose. It requires so much training just to not hit yourself, has no defensive capability, and so on and so forth...
Nunchuck is more like art such as carving. Wood carving is also a part of woodworking. It's beautiful. Can you carve a functional chair? Technically, yes. But is it practical? No. Is it beautiful and worth admiration? Yes.
@@namtrieunguyen7630 Your every "argument" was stolen from your neckbeard incel waifu and repeating lies does not make it true. Try something new - like doing your research on subject.
@@vksasdgaming9472 It seems that you can't accept logic and go for an insult to support your argument.
Wars have already proven it. The most prominent weapons were swords, sticks, staffs, spears, daggers... and guns. Dagger training is even practiced in military training, but nunchuck? Is this the "research" part you want? History? Military training? There is nothing new to it. Facts are facts and require no "newness" to themselves.
Nunchucks are just... inefficient. Nobody says that it's useless compared to nothing (though questionably).
@@namtrieunguyen7630 Thank you for telling more about yourself, kid. You obviously know nothing about nunchaku at all. Shitiversity-cultists are just boring and your fake back-pedaling won't help either. Tell me why American police use nunchaku instead of assault rifle which is much more efficient weapon?
@@vksasdgaming9472 I'm not so sure who is the kid who cannot control his keyboard or brain to spew out insults instead of talking like an adult.
Why do police officers of most US and the remaining part of the world use batons or other weapons, then? How many officers actually use nunchucks in comparison?
so is this channel still making content because its a fun watch
that guy was more busy protecting himself than stabbing, this shows intimidation counts
Unfortunately none fo the arguments you said make nunchuck an effective weapon. The sparing you had with your friend is something that would end almost immediately if you had a stick of comparable size to the nunchuck. And that is just the easiest way to disprove the effectivness of nunchucks. Most paople have close to none combat training and thus cannot perform the level of avoidance needed if someone with a knife attacks them. Also I can't think of any weapon of comparable size to the nunchucks that I would not prefer over nunckucks. Knives and daggers are both smaller in reach so I don't believe that is a good comparison. Maybe a machete would be better...
Next thing. You said you are not a physicist. Well I studied some physics at university and you're right, that is some basic level physics right there. Not Newton's laws though. It's called the law of "conservation of energy". It says that the amount of energy must stay constant in a closed system. That means that the kinetic energy of the weapon is transfered into the target as a force. This is where the Newton's law of action and reaction comes into play. The amount of force one object hits another object with is the same as the amout of force the second object hits the first one with. Easiest way of explaining is if you've ever hit something and felt a backlash in your hand.
Just so that this doesn't become some thesis I'll summarize the science.
When you hit something with a nunchuck the only part transfering the kinetic energy into the target is the upper part of the nunchuck (the hitting part). When you hit something with a stick the part that is transfering kinetic energy into the target is the whole stick and if you've ever hit something with a stick you know that aour arm and part of your bode as well. The comparison between the two is unimaginable.
And a very important part. A weapon cannot be usable to a good degree by professionals for it to be an "effective weapon". An effective weapon is one you can give to a 100 untrained men, and have them perform to a satisfying level within the shortest time possible.
PS: The most simple argument I can think of. How many weapons in the history of warfare were solid and how many had a structure similar to that of a nunchuck. Why was that? The most effective way of using a nunchuck is probably to break the chain holding the two sticks together and use them separately...
PPS: Sorry but english isn't my native language so there might be quite a few mistakes in the text (especially the technical parts).
Thinking by yourself is obviously not your native skill, boy.
@@vksasdgaming9472 How about attacking the argument instead of attacking the person behind it. One shows capability of critical thinking and error in the attacked argument. The oather shows that you are either not smart enough to formulate an argument of your own or that there isn't much to disprove. Or prehaps both.
Which one shows which I'm sure I don't have to tell you.
If you disagree with what I wrote in the comment, try a bit to point out what have I said that was incorrect instead of behaving like an asshole.
Not trying to give you a lot of hate kid but seriously whenever you're going to break something to show your powerful-strength you might want to actually use something that is strong itself such as a fresh piece of bamboo not a already dried out and rotting one