Hollyland Lark 150 vs Rode Wireless GO (which sounds better?)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 дек 2020
  • Hollyland Lark 150: amzn.to/2L8wPwn
    Rode Wireless GO: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...
    SOCIAL:
    Insta: / jeremykruis
    FB: / jeremykruispage
    Website: jeremykruis.com
    GEAR i was using
    camera: amzn.to/3eoNV2T
    lens: amzn.to/2VrZ5Ly
    mic: amzn.to/2XDUY1D
    lighting: amzn.to/2VqqTQg
    lazada links:
    camera: tiny.cc/k2cdpz
    lens: tiny.cc/g3cdpz
    mic:
    All the Gear I use: www.amazon.com/shop/crazykidy...
    #WirelessAudio
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 34

  • @theboujeebanker
    @theboujeebanker 3 года назад +1

    i love the breakdown and the examples you gave. Thank you so much!

  • @BrandOrigins
    @BrandOrigins 2 года назад +1

    Your reviews are sooo good! I absolutely find it helpful when you change the setting and environment using the two different products. Its so clear that you understand what situations content creators will be in when they record their audio. Cheers from PH

  • @olleenqvist1114
    @olleenqvist1114 3 года назад +2

    I was all set to buy the Røde system, but found the Lark and this video tipped the scale, so thanks! Great video!

  • @NateReimers
    @NateReimers 3 года назад +5

    Honestly, the Hollyland sounded a bit better in my opinion.

  • @Rcschim
    @Rcschim 3 года назад +1

    Nice test, thanks for the time, I know these videos are a lot of work. Greets from Austria

  • @SetitesTechAdventures
    @SetitesTechAdventures 3 года назад +3

    Thanks for this. The Rode seems to win for me. I noticed it had a fuller/warmer or bassier sound, but also at times like 2:40 the Hollyland seems to dip in volume if your head is turned for a moment. I didn't hear this effect in the on the rode. The EQ does seem to lower this difference in sound. The Lark is interesting but it seems inferior in audio but superior in features, except for the inability to charge while in use. This is a serious problem if I just want to have the receiver on a powered tripod setup.

  • @jklovett
    @jklovett 3 года назад +3

    Two lav mics sounds amazing. That is a huge selling point for the hollyland i feel like.

  • @JonhyPrieto
    @JonhyPrieto 3 года назад

    Nice review man! 🔥🔥🔥
    what about the gripper? and the weight? Which one do you think is better about this?

  • @tothag84
    @tothag84 3 года назад +1

    Good comparison. I'd go Rode on this one

  • @mrnttv2966
    @mrnttv2966 3 года назад

    I guess isn't compatible with the rode interview go... did you know if there is anything out there who can compare of with this product?

  • @j.b.3076
    @j.b.3076 3 года назад

    Nice vid! Any idea how to upgrade the firmware?? Thanks :)

  • @dallatorretdu
    @dallatorretdu 3 года назад

    I'm still looking for what to buy... I have the rode already... maybe I'll get the Saramonic but they look weird

  • @FoStAl
    @FoStAl 3 года назад +1

    Did Lark loose connect!? :-/

  • @EstherNnamdi
    @EstherNnamdi Год назад

    Can the hollyland mic work on canon m5 ii?

  • @JonathanVarasRoco
    @JonathanVarasRoco 3 года назад

    DUUUUDE this is lit in terms of "just straight out of the camera". Anti-Vibration Sound Chamber Design in #Hollyland is brutal for working-out videos. I would really like to see how it works versus the new #RODEWirelessGoII

  • @whitebeach7669
    @whitebeach7669 3 года назад +2

    What's better for sound quality?
    Please recommend what kind of thing is good

    • @patrickpaganini
      @patrickpaganini 3 года назад +1

      Sennheiser XSW-D is best for sound quality at this cost level. The Rode and Sennheiser have similar noise floor - the Hollyland is noisier than both the Rode and Sennheiser.

  • @EdRobles1
    @EdRobles1 3 года назад +2

    The Hollyland sounds a bit better in my opinion, seems like it has some noise noise cancellation.

  • @RESURRECT2
    @RESURRECT2 2 года назад

    Now do both, but with same quality lav plugged to them.

  • @balong6563
    @balong6563 3 года назад +2

    Hi. Saan mo nabili yung Lark 150 mo?

    • @JeremyKruis
      @JeremyKruis  3 года назад

      Hi! Na send Lang sakin for review. But siguro will be selling soon here in Philippines

  • @DarylGungadoo
    @DarylGungadoo 3 года назад +3

    The Hollyland Lark 150 seems to discriminate the ambient noise better... It would be interesting to check the new RØDE Wireless Go ii (stereo)...

    • @JonathanVarasRoco
      @JonathanVarasRoco 3 года назад

      me too ! I wanna see how it goes against the new version :O

  • @dutchpot
    @dutchpot 3 года назад +1

    I really wanted to love the Hollyland. I love the form factor and receiver design. However, the Rode Wireless Go 2 (out of the box) sounds better, have a better range, have a computer interface for recording directly, and, most important safety feature, have a back-up recording capability on the transmitter which is a game changer. The Rode Wireless Go 2 also supports dB settings instead of 3 settings.

  • @hwn3309
    @hwn3309 3 года назад

    serepet?

    • @hwn3309
      @hwn3309 2 года назад

      @gaming nerf bros 1.0 ??

  • @leoadventures1050
    @leoadventures1050 3 года назад

    Hilly land sounds more solid and basey

  • @dimitrimoonlight
    @dimitrimoonlight 3 года назад +2

    Ride is better.

  • @remektekmedia6641
    @remektekmedia6641 3 года назад

    The RØDE says way better, but the Hollyland offer more features for the dollar.

  • @MrSueciachile
    @MrSueciachile 3 года назад

    When you do exercise i can hear good... But you don't sound fine... Need to exercise more hhahahaa

  • @renaudli5834
    @renaudli5834 3 года назад +1

    Rode Wireless GO is better.