Merrell Moab Speed versus the Adidas Terrex Swift R3. Fast and Slow.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 июл 2024
  • I compare the Merrell Moab Speed and Adidas Terrex Swift R3 after a month of testing and hiking in them.
    Check out the Merrell Moab Speed here: amzn.to/3OdB58P
    Check out the Adidas Terrex Swift R3 here: amzn.to/3xzAUze
    Dusty Hikers is a channel dedicated to those of us who enjoy the outdoors and hiking. I share my journey and experiences in going hiking, planning for hikes, and being outside with my family. Dusty Hikers is for beginners and experts alike. I learn new things and share that information with you. I also enjoy writing. Check out my blog at www.dustyhikers.com for more content on hiking.
  • СпортСпорт

Комментарии • 28

  • @SONG2GO
    @SONG2GO Год назад

    Thank you for your work! Very much enjoyed the candid and informative infos. Very easy to follow as well!

    • @Dusty_Hikers
      @Dusty_Hikers  Год назад

      I just purchased more shoes to review.

  • @jasondawson6777
    @jasondawson6777 Год назад

    Great breakdown of the functions that make a good trail shoe. I appreciate this video.

  • @ThoSchoholic
    @ThoSchoholic Год назад

    Hi Alan! I think the Adidas are thought for wet and muddy terrain as the sole looks pretty similar to Salomon Trail running shoes with cleats. But I wonder about the rock plate inside. Anyway, very interesting comparison!

  • @mo.0.
    @mo.0. Год назад +1

    Is there a referenceIs it suitable for acquisition?Merrell Cham 7 Slam Luna LTR Walking Shoes

  • @Travis-hj9ic
    @Travis-hj9ic Год назад

    Great review! Speed for me!

  • @IlfStoyanov
    @IlfStoyanov Год назад

    💜 for the correct pronunciation of Adidas. In general it's a sign of respect to at least say the names of people or brands (or in the case of Adidas sorta both) properly, so thank you for that and if someone is judging you because you try to show respect, maybe they should adjust their attitude.

  • @pedroesteban8346
    @pedroesteban8346 11 месяцев назад

    Which shoe would you choose: Brooks Cascadia 16 or Merrel Moab Speed?

  • @ytuberization
    @ytuberization Год назад

    Just a short information on the origins of the name Adidas: It is related to the name of the company’s founder Adolf “Adi” Dassler. Otherwise fantastic review. The Swift R3 might not perfectly fit to the other shoes for this comparison, as they are more stable and a kind of approach shoe. There are other, lighter variants in Adidas program. Regarding grip: This Continental profile is more made for rocky underground.

  • @elmariachi5133
    @elmariachi5133 11 месяцев назад

    Do you think the Contonental sole would hold longer on asphalt overall, because it's harder? All my shoes are done after two year at most, becaue the sole has been walked through ..

    • @Dusty_Hikers
      @Dusty_Hikers  11 месяцев назад +1

      Yes, they will defininitely last longer. Long time users have commented on my channel about this. My theory is that the only downside is that they are less grippy than softer outsoles.

    • @elmariachi5133
      @elmariachi5133 11 месяцев назад

      @@Dusty_Hikers Thank you I think less grip is OK for city only :)

  • @muhammad0315
    @muhammad0315 Год назад

    Hi . Very informative. I ve decided to order merrel moab speed from US .I was checking online n its price on one site is $99.73 and in your link its $109.99. I m in a doubt if the lesser amount shoes might be fake or replica. My friend is coming from US in a week or precisely say 22nd of this month. What do you suggest. Thanks

    • @Dusty_Hikers
      @Dusty_Hikers  Год назад

      Hello Syed! Great choice. I really like the Merrell Moab Speed. Use the cheaper link. I doubt they are fake.

    • @muhammad0315
      @muhammad0315 Год назад

      @@Dusty_Hikers " use the cheaper link. I doubt they are fake. " I didn't get you Dusty. Should I go for your link if its original?

    • @muhammad0315
      @muhammad0315 Год назад

      @@Dusty_Hikers one more thing, gore tex is a good choice or a non-waterproof ?

    • @Dusty_Hikers
      @Dusty_Hikers  Год назад

      Hey Syed! For the link, I was just advising you to get the best price. I think if you click on my link then click to another shoe I still get something from Amazon. The non Gore-Tex version would be a three season hiker while the Gore-Tex version would work great even in the winter.

  • @elmariachi5133
    @elmariachi5133 11 месяцев назад

    I'm not convinced by Vibram soles. I have two pair of Merell shoes, one with soles optimized specifically for ice, but they have don'T even have the least grip.

    • @Dusty_Hikers
      @Dusty_Hikers  11 месяцев назад +1

      That is interesting. I always find them to be great. I would say megagrip from vibram is definitely very good. The compound on the Moab 3 is not as good but still decent.

    • @Djurbaa
      @Djurbaa 2 месяца назад

      I agree. I own Merrell Moab 2 Vent and I found them on wet surface to be really dangerous to wear.

  • @Puddingtops
    @Puddingtops Год назад

    It’s funny how the continental sole on the adidas shoe isn’t very good for grip over in the US while over in the UK on steep muddy trails with exposed wet rocks and lots of tree roots the continental sole blows all my vibram sole boots out of the water for grip 🤷‍♂️

    • @Dusty_Hikers
      @Dusty_Hikers  Год назад

      It's probably a problem with metric versus imperial, or stone versus pounds.

  • @V4L3M0N
    @V4L3M0N Год назад +2

    Your pronounciation of "Adidas" makes me happy as a German. I always cringe a little when hearing the american one.
    And Adidas is a German brand after all :D

  • @okthen22ok
    @okthen22ok Год назад

    asics venture 8 still better!

  • @mswkt656
    @mswkt656 Год назад

    Aren t you special