Several aircraft have issues with adequate lighting. one some maps you can't see squat on the A-10 HUD in either day/night mode because it cannot get intense enough to contrast with the blue-whte haze of the sky.
@@ontherampflightsim "We destroyed that bigger than Dallas!" "Shack!" "What the hell is wrong with you?" (if you shot the tanker) and "We're in deep doo-doo now" (after a SAM hit). One time I was able to get the WSO to puke after relentlessly pulling negative-G's, it was hilarious. I have countless hours on Jane's F15, what a classic it was...
@@MtnCommando no I wasn't with the 131st. But I think I remember them. During that time I was with the 169th Panthers and very shortly after we moved on to Janes fa 18. When I join the 169th I changed my call sign to Sith. Also I believe right around that time is when EA took down the launcher web pages for online play in f-18 and we moved to a standalone program called hyperlobby, and that was how we continued on with all of the squadron activities amongst the other groups online. Those were SUCH good times......
I was very thirsty for this. Thanks, I'm from the group of people waiting to see this bird in my hangar. Now my depressing start of the week is not so depressing. xD
Thanks for sharing. Would you mind sharing where the relevant things are in the second seat if things are duplicated as well? (Like in this video: "This is where the UFC and the keypad are in the back seat" sort of thing.)
Theyre not close to completion like the strike eagle. I believe some time after the strike eagle releases, we'll see more of the Super Tucano's systems
IT IS!!! I really hope for the sake of our poor hearts that it will be released soon. The wait for the Typhoon will be a bit easier with the help of the strike eagle.
Great tutorial. Just one critique however. The Hud controls and master mode selection buttons are not part of the UFC, they are actually part of the Hud Control panel.
So will this module be on the same level of overall consistency as ED's F-16 or F/A-18? Is the team shooting for something that will feel as complete and consistent as the A-10C module? I ask because the Mirage had a pretty shaky launch and while it did get a lot better, it only really got where it needed to be when the AdA got involved directly. Likewise. The Harrier's development has also been a rocky road it doesn't feel as polished or as consistent as ED's modules. I guess I am asking if RAZBAM is shooting for Eagle Dynamics or even Heatblur levels of quality and detail here or are they going to be developing this to their own internal standard that may not match up with what we have come to expect from others?
I think it's worth remembering that the Hornet and especially the Viper were egregiously incomplete at launch. The Viper didn't even have a damage model, of any description. Regarding the Mirage, I think it's understandable that a lot of changes had to wait for the AdA, since the French keep data about avionics VERY close compared to the US. The Harrier is, I think, the real worry since it's an American McDonnell Douglas aircraft just like the Strike Eagle. Hopefully Razbam recognize that this is going to instantly become their flagship product and their entire reputation will live or die with this launch. All that said, I bought the Mirage years ago when I heard that Razbam were doing the Strike Eagle, in order to see if they were worthy. I love that Mirage so much, I just can't help but give Razbam the benefit of the doubt. I'm not sure if I trust it to be amazing on launch, but I do believe it will at least achieve greatness in the eventuality of time. Hopefully. Please.
@@JETZcorp Eagle Dynamics has always been a known quantity when it comes to the standards they strive for and the way they handle early access. The F-16 early access release was a misstep on their part but they were also very quick to take personal responsibility and it didn't take very long for it to get to a pretty good state. I guess the answer I am hoping for (but not really expecting on this comments section) from RAZBAM is what their own internal standard is? Does that standard match what we see from Eagle Dynamics, Heatblur, and even Deka? Do they have their own internal idea of what a accurate, realistic DCS module is? If the Harrier and Mirage are any indication, this seems to be the case and it is something that they probably should put out in the open so people can go in with adjusted expectations.
The graphics of the cockpit look great! Question: does the Mudhen handle more like an F-18 or an F-14? It’s not FBW, correct? The F-18 feels quite sluggish compared to the F-14, which feels very direct and unrestricted, which makes sense considering it’s not FBW.
It has the same FCS as the F-15C, just a bit more weight, drag and also a bit more engine power behind it. If you have the FC3 F-15C, that's how she flies, not fly by wire but a lot of assistance from the FCS, just like the F-18, wich also does not have FBW. Currently in DCS only the F-16, Mirage 2000 and JF-17 (pitch only) have fly-by-wire. Edit: after @HeavyMetalMonk 's comment, the F-18 has a limited mechanical backup to the stabilators, but the FCS can completely override it, so for all intents and purposes it is also full FBW.
@@kilianortmann9979 I don’t have the F-15C, but as this other person said, the F-18 does have fly by wire. But the question still stands. Will the F-15E feel sluggish like the F-18 or sharp like the F-14? How does the F-15C feel, considering it’s so similar?
@@rhysgoodman7628 Unfortunately I can't compare it to the F-18, I only have the F-14, JF-17 and a little bit of time in the F-15. To me the F-15 does not feel sluggish but the FCS has noticeable authority, it basically irons out adverse and proverse yaw tendencies. The F-15 also has aileron-rudder interconnect, instead of switching from aileron to rudder roll as the AoA increases (like in the F-14) the FCS does that for you. I feel like I have quite a bit more pitch and over G authority in the F-15 than in the Jeff, but obviously not the instant rip your wings of levels of the Tomcat. I guess you have to try it out, to me both feel crisp after two or three maneuvers to get accustomed to the different flight characteristics, you might be more sensitive to this than I am though.
@@kilianortmann9979 interesting. Thanks! Sounds like the F-15 has more of an “assisted” feel. The F-18 has a very restricted, sluggish feel. I never noticed it until I got the F-14, which is extremely sharp and unrestricted. Thanks!
5:02 Hope she will sound better than in the Harrier. That voice and also the RWR tones are just weird. Coming from MDD as well, I would imagine it all should sound more like in the Hornet since they pretty much share the systems for all that... 8:16 From a software dev standpoint, this is utter BS, but probably, how many things went at MDD. A decent system would basically "backspace" on a short press and clear the whole thing on a long press. 8:50 Nice! 11:30 Nice!
The Harrier's Betty recordings were from the actual Jet, provided by USMC. 8:16 that is how the actual UFC works. Also not mentioned is when you click it with nothing in the scratch pad, it clears the entire UFC.
It’s completely unreadable in this video. I hope you won’t replicate HeatBlurs fire warming glass covered lights and make it unreadable in VR. Also, no need to objectify ‘Betty’. Sigh.
Игры
I hope the UFC led’s are brighter on release.
Cant see shit :D
he has it turned down a little, it can get brighter
Several aircraft have issues with adequate lighting. one some maps you can't see squat on the A-10 HUD in either day/night mode because it cannot get intense enough to contrast with the blue-whte haze of the sky.
I honestly cant wait, never been this excited for a module before
I remember playing Jane's F15 Strike Eagle back in the day. I loved that game, clocked hours on it so looking forward to this.
SO many hours in that game! Still have my disk too!!
“How ‘bout them apples!” 😆 Loved the voice-overs when you dropped bombs in that game.
Takes one right back, no?
@@ontherampflightsim
"We destroyed that bigger than Dallas!"
"Shack!"
"What the hell is wrong with you?" (if you shot the tanker) and
"We're in deep doo-doo now" (after a SAM hit).
One time I was able to get the WSO to puke after relentlessly pulling negative-G's, it was hilarious.
I have countless hours on Jane's F15, what a classic it was...
@@MtnCommando I still hear "Chaff! Chaff!" in my nightmares sometimes.
Excellent video tutorial. Makes it real clear. Can't wait for the release. Looking real good so far...
Man, takes me right back to 1998... Jane's F-15E with a 2000hr flight-time on my pilot. :) Callsign was Chevy in case I ever met any of you online.
Were you with the online squadron 131st? I was callsign Condor. I still use that callsign in my RC flying
@@MtnCommando no I wasn't with the 131st. But I think I remember them. During that time I was with the 169th Panthers and very shortly after we moved on to Janes fa 18. When I join the 169th I changed my call sign to Sith. Also I believe right around that time is when EA took down the launcher web pages for online play in f-18 and we moved to a standalone program called hyperlobby, and that was how we continued on with all of the squadron activities amongst the other groups online. Those were SUCH good times......
Spike GCI 11 o'clock
Mad hype for this module, it's gonna be the new go-to do everything aircraft in DCS
This is an eagerly anticipated module. Thank you for these tutorials.
Cant wait for this beast to come out!
THis, The Mirage F-1, The F-4 Phantom! All in a year! In the voice of Venom: *So many Modules, so little time!*
And hopefully the EF typhoon
@@burningpotato9447 Nope, typhoon will release more likely 23 or 24
@@burningpotato9447 Typhoon is confirmed next year
@@F22raptor46 where ?
@@savagespud8038 I heard on one of their updates they said mostly 2023
Great job looking forward to it!
Nice work Notso!
Hyped beyond words for the mudhen! Keep doing the lord’s work.
Looking really good!
Yooo the aircraft looks almost ready!
WOW- I can't wait for this aircraft!!!!!!!!! Great job team!!!
I like the texturing on this one.
I was very thirsty for this. Thanks, I'm from the group of people waiting to see this bird in my hangar. Now my depressing start of the week is not so depressing. xD
Amazing stuff... Thank you
Looks Awesome!!
I love the way the UFC never changed it's display the entire time he was talking about what was supposed to be on it......
I’m actually crafting an entire front MFD panel for flying this aircraft… hope it come soon !
Thanks for sharing. Would you mind sharing where the relevant things are in the second seat if things are duplicated as well? (Like in this video: "This is where the UFC and the keypad are in the back seat" sort of thing.)
Hurry up guys, I cant wait
Awesome!
Man I can't wait for this bird. I hope it's not too far off.
any way to get into the beta program guys? im being forced to learn the 16 now
Exciting!
1 step closer letss goo
This module WILL get my money. I'm also a bit patient, so I'm good with Razbam taking their time to release a product THEY feel is ready.
I was not expecting the F-15E to be this far along, very impressive. Early access late this year or early next?
Prolly Christmas 2022
Tutorials usually mean a month or two away
2 weeks
@@echo9645 sauce?
@@theonefrancis696 It's a meme. This whole 2 weeksTM thing :)
I just bought the viper but i think this year ill be buying two modules xD
Are they still shooting for a 2022 release??
are you guys gonna post anything about the multiple other projects you have or i can just give up on ever having the A29 in game?
Theyre not close to completion like the strike eagle. I believe some time after the strike eagle releases, we'll see more of the Super Tucano's systems
RAZBAM I have been waiting for this since 2014 and its the first time I plan to pre-order something, dont fck this up pls.
Looking phenomenal! The wait is unbearable...
IT IS!!! I really hope for the sake of our poor hearts that it will be released soon. The wait for the Typhoon will be a bit easier with the help of the strike eagle.
Day ONE purchase!!
Hell yes!
I heard rumors that we will also get a digital UFC option, can you please confirm this rumor?
As far as I know they already confirmed it. But they will develop it after early access release
On the forums it states that there will be both digital and classic UFCs.
YESSS
VR is the future thing about it
When is it coming out? Give us a release date
Will it be released in 2022 ?
i was expecting a Hey guys wags here from eagle dynamics, i was taken aback with the hey strike eagle fans
any release date (rough at least)
Lg Amazing plane
Great tutorial. Just one critique however. The Hud controls and master mode selection buttons are not part of the UFC, they are actually part of the Hud Control panel.
Shut up and take my money!! Lol. But seriously, its looking good!
TOP 👍👍👍👍👍👍
Why is the UFC display so dim. I think it needs to be brighter
No it's it like that in daylight, why so many pilots love the new digital UFC.
Nice! Any word on approximate release?
nope
Wait 2 more weeks fella
@DarkSlayer Well, I said same thing :d
I'll buy this! 💵💵
So will this module be on the same level of overall consistency as ED's F-16 or F/A-18? Is the team shooting for something that will feel as complete and consistent as the A-10C module? I ask because the Mirage had a pretty shaky launch and while it did get a lot better, it only really got where it needed to be when the AdA got involved directly. Likewise. The Harrier's development has also been a rocky road it doesn't feel as polished or as consistent as ED's modules.
I guess I am asking if RAZBAM is shooting for Eagle Dynamics or even Heatblur levels of quality and detail here or are they going to be developing this to their own internal standard that may not match up with what we have come to expect from others?
I think it's worth remembering that the Hornet and especially the Viper were egregiously incomplete at launch. The Viper didn't even have a damage model, of any description.
Regarding the Mirage, I think it's understandable that a lot of changes had to wait for the AdA, since the French keep data about avionics VERY close compared to the US. The Harrier is, I think, the real worry since it's an American McDonnell Douglas aircraft just like the Strike Eagle. Hopefully Razbam recognize that this is going to instantly become their flagship product and their entire reputation will live or die with this launch.
All that said, I bought the Mirage years ago when I heard that Razbam were doing the Strike Eagle, in order to see if they were worthy. I love that Mirage so much, I just can't help but give Razbam the benefit of the doubt. I'm not sure if I trust it to be amazing on launch, but I do believe it will at least achieve greatness in the eventuality of time. Hopefully. Please.
@@JETZcorp Eagle Dynamics has always been a known quantity when it comes to the standards they strive for and the way they handle early access. The F-16 early access release was a misstep on their part but they were also very quick to take personal responsibility and it didn't take very long for it to get to a pretty good state.
I guess the answer I am hoping for (but not really expecting on this comments section) from RAZBAM is what their own internal standard is? Does that standard match what we see from Eagle Dynamics, Heatblur, and even Deka? Do they have their own internal idea of what a accurate, realistic DCS module is? If the Harrier and Mirage are any indication, this seems to be the case and it is something that they probably should put out in the open so people can go in with adjusted expectations.
almost 15 mins of me drooling............
The graphics of the cockpit look great!
Question: does the Mudhen handle more like an F-18 or an F-14? It’s not FBW, correct? The F-18 feels quite sluggish compared to the F-14, which feels very direct and unrestricted, which makes sense considering it’s not FBW.
It has the same FCS as the F-15C, just a bit more weight, drag and also a bit more engine power behind it.
If you have the FC3 F-15C, that's how she flies, not fly by wire but a lot of assistance from the FCS, just like the F-18, wich also does not have FBW.
Currently in DCS only the F-16, Mirage 2000 and JF-17 (pitch only) have fly-by-wire.
Edit: after @HeavyMetalMonk 's comment, the F-18 has a limited mechanical backup to the stabilators, but the FCS can completely override it, so for all intents and purposes it is also full FBW.
@@kilianortmann9979 F/A-18 in DCS is fully FBW.
@@kilianortmann9979 I don’t have the F-15C, but as this other person said, the F-18 does have fly by wire.
But the question still stands. Will the F-15E feel sluggish like the F-18 or sharp like the F-14? How does the F-15C feel, considering it’s so similar?
@@rhysgoodman7628 Unfortunately I can't compare it to the F-18, I only have the F-14, JF-17 and a little bit of time in the F-15.
To me the F-15 does not feel sluggish but the FCS has noticeable authority, it basically irons out adverse and proverse yaw tendencies.
The F-15 also has aileron-rudder interconnect, instead of switching from aileron to rudder roll as the AoA increases (like in the F-14) the FCS does that for you.
I feel like I have quite a bit more pitch and over G authority in the F-15 than in the Jeff, but obviously not the instant rip your wings of levels of the Tomcat.
I guess you have to try it out, to me both feel crisp after two or three maneuvers to get accustomed to the different flight characteristics, you might be more sensitive to this than I am though.
@@kilianortmann9979 interesting. Thanks! Sounds like the F-15 has more of an “assisted” feel. The F-18 has a very restricted, sluggish feel. I never noticed it until I got the F-14, which is extremely sharp and unrestricted. Thanks!
Release When
say when !
Very quiet audio but good vid.
terrible luminance, i cant see that text clearly
I'm hyped.. but how much is it gonna cost me?
Does it matter at this point??? 🤑🤑🤑
@@ImperiumLibertas idk but its definetly gonna cost me alot
$80
say what happened to the digital ufc?
We are still making it, it will be a feature.
Sound is bit low.
Please release the module so I can pay full price for it we have our credit cards ready to go.
When?
2 more weeks
@@marblefalcon lmao you playing with peoples emotions man lol.
@@savagespud8038 that's if people thru it))
Cant wait to use this analogue UFC! The digital one is kinda lame in my opinion.
when mudhen?!
2 more weeks
"Mudwhen?" :D
We need MİG-23 sir.
Drinking game for the word "notice". Lol.
I haven't clicked faster
lmfao
Sexy plane :)
Just like you😩
@@horashio1593 ask him on a date already jeez
@@horashio1593 AYO 🤨
@@itsjustyas7724 fr 🤨📸
Honestly, stop teasing me... This is like waiting at the door for a package all day long because you didn't get an arrival date...
5:02 Hope she will sound better than in the Harrier. That voice and also the RWR tones are just weird. Coming from MDD as well, I would imagine it all should sound more like in the Hornet since they pretty much share the systems for all that...
8:16 From a software dev standpoint, this is utter BS, but probably, how many things went at MDD. A decent system would basically "backspace" on a short press and clear the whole thing on a long press.
8:50 Nice!
11:30 Nice!
The Harrier's Betty recordings were from the actual Jet, provided by USMC. 8:16 that is how the actual UFC works. Also not mentioned is when you click it with nothing in the scratch pad, it clears the entire UFC.
I understand what your saying but I can't see anything on the ufc
The real f15 has such unreadable numbers? Like im literally imagine what he is doing cuz my eyes cant see shit lol
you can barely read the UFC, you should increase the brightness.
There's a massive inaccuracy in this video that must be fixed
You said betty was way sexier than you
You tease….. (lol)
I LOVE RAZBAM I WILL SACRIFICE MY LIFE FOR RAZBAM
Bro wtf is wrong with you lol bro acting different after goin to their discord loooo
Awesome stuff. Why is the UFC so dim? Can barely see whats on it
pls mod
Shut up and take my money
*reading the HUD*
"G 521"
w a t
Probably the active pause
2 weeks
first
Plz gibs
god just release it already. your map was disappointing. just need something better.
Gib
Guys. Fix the volume on your tutorials. -14 lufs. It's not rocket science.
ngl, the UFC is really disappointing. can’t even read it
They'll probably add the new UFC, that will be much more visible.
Its turned down in brightness.
It’s completely unreadable in this video. I hope you won’t replicate HeatBlurs fire warming glass covered lights and make it unreadable in VR. Also, no need to objectify ‘Betty’. Sigh.
I'm going to objectify Betty every day and there's nothing you can do about it 😩
finally, gay people (mudhen drivers) can have a jet of their own
It's a but dim and hard to see. Hope you changed that.
There’s a brightness knob
@@gnranger Then he should have used that knob to turn the brightness up on that center console in cockpit before he made this video.