The US M4 rifle is better than the AK! THAT'S WHY
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 фев 2023
- #shorts That's why the American M4 rifle is better than the AK.
The M4 carbine (officially Carbine, Caliber 5.56 mm, M4) is a 5.56×45mm NATO, gas-operated,[b] magazine-fed carbine developed in the United States during the 1980s. It is a shortened version of the M16A2 assault rifle.
#RUclipsShorts
❤️️❤️️❤️️❤️️❤️️❤️️❤️️
↪ My mail / cooperation: militarygirlyt@proton.me
➤ More news, photos and videos on my TG: t.me/MilitaryGirlYT
❤️️❤️️❤️️❤️️❤️️❤️️❤️️
✌️❤️️
Military Girl - A blog about what is happening in the military sphere around the world! News, Technology, Military equipment, Army military exercises and funny short videos 😂
👉Subscribe and watch more👈
The M4 is extensively used by the United States Armed Forces, with decisions to largely replace the M16 rifle in United States Army (starting 2010) and United States Marine Corps (USMC) (starting 2016) combat units as the primary infantry weapon[9][10] and service rifle. The M4 has been adopted by over 60 countries worldwide,[11] and has been described as "one of the defining firearms of the 21st century".[12]
Since its adoption in 1994,[11] the M4 has undergone over 90 modifications to improve the weapon's ergonomics and modularity, including: the M4A1, which strengthened the barrel and removed the burst-fire option; the SOPMOD, an accessory kit containing optical attachments; and the underbarrel M203 grenade launcher.
In April 2022, the U.S. Army selected the SIG MCX Spear, designated the XM7, as the winner of the Next Generation Squad Weapon Program to replace the M16/M4.[13]
Specifications
Mass 6.43 lb (2.92 kg) empty[4]
7.75 lb (3.52 kg) with 30 rounds and sling
Length 33 in (838 mm) (stock extended)
29.75 in (756 mm) (stock retracted)
Barrel length 14.5 in (368 mm)
Cartridge 5.56×45mm NATO
Caliber 5.56 mm (.223 in)
Action Gas-operated, closed rotating bolt, Stoner expanding gas
Rate of fire 700-950 round/min cyclic[5]
Muzzle velocity 2,970 ft/s (910 m/s) (M855A1 round)[6]
2,887 ft/s (880 m/s) (M855 round)
2,986 ft/s (910 m/s) (M193 round)
Effective firing range 500 m (550 yd)[7]
Feed system 30-round box magazine or other STANAG magazines.[a]
Sights Iron sights or various optics
Source: DVIDS
🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪
EDIT:
Music: RUclips Audio Library
Mantage: Sony Vegas Pro 13
Translated by Google Translator
🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪 🇺🇸 💪
©️✅
Copyright. All videos on the channel do not violate copyright and are taken from the original sources under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 / 3.0 / PUBLIC DOMAIN license. And have been edited by the author of the / @militarygirl channel
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
Woman ☕
Fr they are both great
Гендерный шовинист
Dude i bet she's a bot
@@gentlememe3381 she is there’s multiple accs that are exactly like this one
@@pepperidgefarms1772 fact, i am love AR-15 and AK
Military Girl moment ☕
Women☕
Ahahahahhahahahha
yea , her/him just a kid and dont know AK very Good in Combat
Nice job!
The US Democratic Party is proud of you! Plus one hamburger and a transgender wife!🇱🇷🇺🇸🇲🇾
No Moldova? 😢
@@neftalimorales5449 Yes Argentina ? Wtf ?
Wth🗿
Ахахаха
Wtf why you put my country
M4: неет, у меня песчанка застряла я не могу больше стрелять
АК: я измазан в песке, воде и грязи. Я отлично себя чувствую.
Так не работает. AR тоже надежная винтовка, гораздо современнее чем АК, но АК очень прост в обращении. Опытный боец с винтовкой М-серии не хуже опытного бойца с АК. Но выбор повстанца в резиновых тапочках, который оружие не держал в руках раньше, это, конечно, АК. С ним точно разберется.
Nah, There are videos proving the opposite.
is that normal????
@@SharpBayonetда, вы правы. Автомат Калашникова очень прост и надёжен из за его пустоты и пространства внутри, но и АК, и М4 имеют свой недостатки. Впрочем, оба хороши и спорит какой лучше нет смысла, ведь автоматы всё выходят модернизируются, вот недавно вышел АК-103, но не изменяемым остаётся то, что не важно какое у тебя оружия, главное какой ты стрелок.
@@user-oh3rj9fb9r согласен
Ak is the best friend for a fighter
Works in water in dust in sand
Simple to use simple to maintain simple to manufacture
That's why is considered the best of the best
Kalshinkov was a genius of an engineer
Doesn’t work very well in mud
No, he wasn’t. He literally took the idea of the STG44 (built by the Germans) and ran with THEIR idea.
@@silenceviolencesilence1370 normal germany win
@@silenceviolencesilence1370 they dont look similar inside or outside so i dont think you think at all
@@silenceviolencesilence1370only similar thing about them is the (not really similar) gas piston
M4 :
- expensive AF
- jammed on sand and mud
- less penetration
Ak
- cheap as hell
- rarely jammed even in mud, water and sand
- better penetration
- easier to use
- the legendary rifle
“Jammed on sand and mud”
For 20 years in Afghanistan there wasn’t a whole lot of m4s jamming, and with a closed bolt, where does the mud go in
They’re just as easy to use, I’ve used both.
Also if the ak is so reliable, why does mud go in the chamber when you submerge it, maybe because it has an OPEN BOLT
@@certified0093 Закупка одного АК-12 на сегодняшний день обходиться Минобороны России примерно в 40-45 тыс.рублей. Это 490 долларов.
@@Dasha_X9 the AK 12 is even more costly and difficult to produce than the AK 105. I didn't use the AK12 as an example precisely because its too expensive and it would not be a good comparison. you have been lied to, which is not surprising considering the debate on Russian weapons as a whole is rife with lies... or lack of education. its difficult to determine which.
With the ammo the us is using at the minute witch is green tip it has the same pen as 7.62 ap btw it cost 20 dollars more than an ak to produce and only had 2 more stoppages on a stress test with the ak
Check your fax before you comment
@FSB M855 green tips are a light armor pentrator, that's basically standard steel core ammunition. M855A1 and M995 are armor piercing, of which there's a large inventory of all 3. I don't really understand what you are trying to say. Prices for any and all russian weapons are up for debate as the numbers thrown around seem to change magically quite often.
Atleast AK doesn't broke when you accidentally drop it in mud
AR doesn't either🤯🤯🤯
Ima give my perspective on ar vs ak
Vietnam era m16 < ak
Modern day ar15 or m4 > ak any day
Both are good weapon systems and they have their own perks, but an Ar is better in general. But in certain situations an ak might be better
@@Monkey45983АК better if you compare modern ar 15 and modern АК
@@user-bo9rz9re7i no, AR is still better. They literally make ak variants to copy the ar-15 adding similar calibers and rails
@@Monkey45983 simular calibers?
New calibers is 5.45 x39 "low impuls bullet" and 9 x 39 "lower sound speed bullet" is simular 5.56x45 NATO?
M4 Vs Ak47 In Viteam War
Result : Ak Winner
I didn't know m4 exist in the Vietnam war.
Vietnam*
The m4 wasn’t in Vietnam but okay bud
AK less accurate then M-16, but cheaper and less need to be cleaned - perfect for guerrilla warfare.
The Vietnamese won with a homemade pistol made from bamboo and a spring.
Ak
Cheap
Most produced
Easy to use
+
Ak isn't cheaper
@@ej_22 yes it is, why do u think every poor country uses it? And even if it wasn’t cheap it’s cheaper than the M4
@@methcooker6402 it not cheaper, poor country buying aks is the only rifle that they can get. Ak unit coast is little higher than the m4
@@ej_22 it’s not. Look up “why do poor countries buy the AK-47, don’t go off of what a bias channel says to you💀
Стрелять надо уметь не важно какой оружия
Чувак эта та самая пушка из кс м 4
Легендарная как по мне пушка
@@godmod156 И что с этого? Зато она больше клинет чем АК.
I guess so
Люди, не сравнивайте реальную жизнь с игрой, там всё не так как в реальности
Expensive m4 vs cheap and less problematic akm
Expensive Armata Tank and cheap western javelin😉
@@yurinator6380 The javelin cost 249k lol. Rpg 7 cost 2500
@@yurinator6380
Армату он не пробьёт!
@@rooftoops3799 RPG 7 also cannot reliably take out a tank
@@neftalimorales5449 sure it can. The Taliban successfully take out some NATO tank in Afghanistan
The AK is the most sold weapon around the world. So it's dumb to say that the AR is better.
Uh sure ok buddy
@@GK-mr9ko what's the problem?
@@rooftoops3799 AR15 is superior
@@rooftoops3799 ARs are more accurate, have better range, are more reliable and are highly modular… they are the better style of rifle without a doubt. Now, the reason the AK is the most common gun is because of the ridiculous amount of old surplus soviet aks meaning you can get one for insanely cheap on the international market in comparison to an AR
@@cameronmain8421 Ok. But the AK still have more quality than the AR and it's more easy to use it.
Калашников хорош в соотношении цена - качество
Если зажимом то м4 лучше + доп комплект стоит дешевле чем на калаш
@@user-dk5dp5id9f ладно
@@user-dk5dp5id9f Ты че бля с КС это взял ))) Ты братан не путай игры и реальную жизнь.
@@user-dk5dp5id9f а я смотрю с дивана хороший вид
Depending on where you're from tbh... in the US a quality AK cost much more than a quality AR
Funny how US is comparing their modern weapons to a 1947 russian weapon
Only now there are AK12 assault rifles and newer assault rifles chambered for 5 cartridges
5.45 NATO
YEAH BUT, knowing this npc named 'military transgender girl' we ovbiously know that she compared a M4 to a AK-47
And even then AK is still better lmao @@use_your_mama
AK 12 and 74 are not of 1947...
And it is not America's problem Russia cannot upgrade its weapons
@gook5219 AK platform is better then most American rifles and ar's
@@gook5219Naturally, the AK-47 is not included because it was produced in 1947, the AK-74 and AK-12 are newer and were produced in newer times. And the AK-12 has picatinny rails for installing optics and handles.
Can someone show militarygirl the video of where American soldiers were shooting the AK-47 and the recoil was pushing them back. They couldn't even stand it😂😂😂.
Are you aware that once upon a time an experiment was conducted in which the M4 rifle and AK 4u were kept in a deep freezer. After sometime they were brought out, the M4 stopped working while the AK 47 was able to shoot properly. Reliability matters 😜😝
I would guess that is useful in the artic tundra maybe
There’s also a video where an AK and AR both get mud and dust baths and the AR doesn’t jam while the AK does, which is much more realistic than a deep freezer test
@@cameronmain8421 ++
@@cameronmain8421 lol he didn't know that lol
There was a test where someone (Garand Thumb) put a m4 and AK in mud, and the AK became a bolt action while the m4 was fine
Ukranian soldier with droken M4: Well, well...
Russian soldier in T-72 seeing the approaching Javelin: Comrades, today we join Soviet space program!
When the excellent gun AR was put into the Vietnam War as the M16, many young American soldiers died in action due to the failure of the poor shell and poor bolt closure.
A truly good military gun must protect the lives of its own country's precious soldiers, not let them die.
That was the first iteration, later models fixed those issues. The M16 was so good that the Soviets felt the need to modify the AK with the AK-74 model
And it wasn’t necessarily an issue with the m16, the issue was that they marketed the rifle as self cleaning and thus soldiers didn’t clean their rifles and they became prone to jam and misfire in the dirty hot conditions of Vietnam, an AK would do the same. InRangeTV has a good video that shows when properly maintained an AR style rifle is more reliable and accurate than the AK platform 👍🏻
The soldier in this video wasn’t using an M16 though, and the M16 and M16A1 have both been replaced.
@@tapioca2768 no it’s an m4a1 I know but it used the same piston based firing mechanism and is from the same family of rifles. It’s like saying the AK-47 and the AK-74 are different I mean yeah they are but the way they operate is almost identical
@@cameronmain8421 So why the Vietnam's soldiers win ? If the AK is worst than the M16 lol
Но при этом наши калаши могут пройти и пыль,и песок,и воду,так еще потом отлично работать. В отличии от м16 и других модернизаций.
This isn’t a m16, it’s an m4
Lies lol they did a test video and dumped an M16 through shovels of mud and sand
@@West_Coast_Gangm16 good
Особенно это смешно, когда АК не стреляет в конце полосы при сдаче на крап… тогда диванные лозунги уже не помогают
А давай, ты в следующий раз в своих сравнениях будешь добавлять ещё одну страну. Украину( твою страну) . А то и можешь только восхвалять даже не твою страну, зато обсирать других
Так свою Страну хвалить нет чем ,если только что прос...ли
@@Ivan-ls2lrЧё?
Жду сравнение обучения американского спецназа и русских школьников
I forgot to disassemble and clean my entire ar-15 after I left on the sun yesterday for too long, now it won't shoot 😢
ARs perform better in mud than AKs. Watch mud tests.
@@MartianOrion Ever seen an Albanian made Ak-47 (cold war era)?
Well, tests say it can resist well in any climate and conditions
Ну а дальше 300 метров стреляй и молись чтобы попало🤣🤣🤣
Just tell me how often you are fighting enemy on 300 meters? Plus AK hit target up to 400meter. Add bigger caliber and you will see that even you hit just the shoulder or leg you have soldier out of game. Also ,try to hide from AK behind cinder block wall. AR can not penetrate cinder block. AK destroyed them.
@@Casper1907Россия часто воевала не в городах, а на полях и в горах, вот поэтому автомат Калашникова имеет среднюю дальность 440 метров.
@@Casper1907 the m4 is accurate to 600 metres so can actually reliably hit targets further away, and the whole 556 vs 7.62 debate only really matters in close quarters, if you get hit by an m4 at 400 metres your not gonna be able to return fire with the AK especially with the recoil
@@cameronmain8421mass using in russian army have АК with 5.45 x 39 caliber
7.62 x 39 use only old АК-46 АК-47 АКМ РПК СКС and modern АК-1(2,3)03 АК-15.
The nost "popular" АК-74М and АК-12 РПК-74 have 5.45 less massive and nore fast bullet it can be effective uo to 1km
Так, я один здесь не понял, почему Стоунер лучше систем АК по мнению этого сучества?
да просто милитари герл обиделась на русских и вылаживает видео где обсирают все русское
Aint no way she said that the King of all guns is worser than a M4
M4 (5.56) :
- ~700 dollars to produce
- 2.9 kg unloaded
- 500m range
- 760-840mm long (adjustable)
- 368mm barrel
- adjustable gas (runs better if adjusted for environment)
- less likely to get mud inside
- more modular
- better ammunition available for armor penetration (m855a1 / m995)
AK 105 (5.45 x 39)
- ~700-800 dollars to produce
- 3.2 kg unloaded
- 300m range
- 590-830mm long (foldable)
- 314mm barrel
- Runs better without being cleaned
- Some say the ammunition fragments more causing more damage.
- higher manufacturing tolerances so if the gun gets damaged, it's more likely to run
- cleaning kit stored in stock
bro learned grammar from the Carls Jr. parking lot
The reason why the m4 is better than the AK is because THE DAMN 47 WAS DESIGNED IN 1947 AND THE M4 CARBINE WAS DESIGNED IN 1982, ah yes, women ☕️
Well, it beats the AK-12 too
@@christopherchartier3017 yeah it beats the ak12 too, BUT IF THEY PUT THE FUCKING SAFETY IN ITS ORIGINAL POSITION LIKE THE 47, THEN IT WOULD BEAT THE DAMN M4
Also because a weapon is old doesn’t mean it’s outdated and the maxim machine gun and M2 browning prove that
@@meme_chan69
I have a realistic comparison
Ak-47:
Proved to have shot down a B-52 during Vietnam war
Can resist mud
Can shoot up to 3 million rounds before being unusable
High penetration
High recoil
Worse in urban environments, better in jungles and forests
M4:
Less recoil
Better in urban environments, worse in jungles and forests
Less penetration
Can suit more attachments
Better accuracy
So, the Ak-47 is more useful in forests and more durable, while the M4 is easier to use
@@SCPFoundationist YEAH, EXACTLY BRUH
Bro wants to compare a 1947 rifle to a modern one
Bro didn't read the title
Yes, but this 1947 rifle stills better than a modern one when put in extreme enviroments
Rodzina AK: tanie, proste w budowie, pancerne i nie do zajechania.
Rodzina AR: Potrafią trochę kosztować, do prostych nie należą, nie mają wolnego miejsca w środku, co skutkuje Częstym zacięciem i czyszczeniem całej broni od środka co jakiś czas...
The modern m4 rarely ever jams and when it does it’s only a problem with the mag
@@enanny0616ну, да редко....но метко!!!
@@enanny0616и чем арка лучше ак, я понимаю если снайперку делать, но оружие в основном ближней и реже средней дистанции...так ак лучше м4...надёжней, проще, дешевле, мощнее...как основное оружие солдат механизма армии...Калашников лучше!
You guys that are comparing the 2 rifles should realize the context, which is shown here - open field soldiering.
Are most ARs more accurate at long range than most AKs?
Yes, so I'd prefer the AR in open field battle over distance.
But how many of you guys posting here are currently posted in a war zone or think you might be in the near future?
Perhaps we should also discuss other uses for these rifles and how they compare in, say, inside-your-home defense.
And why not own BOTH?
Disclaimer:
I own both - and they're both short-barrel, with optics, for home defense.
ХАХАХАХАХХА, АК проще в создании и качественнее, а точность зависит от человека 😂🤣
The ak47 uses a larger round and thus has more recoil
Да у меня гладкоствольное кучнее пули ложит 😁😁😁. Круче калаша только новый калаш
Красава
Ружье МР-155 ваш пропуск в мир гладкого ствола
Fun fact: there's an actual chainsaw bayonet for the ar15. No, I'm not joking.
what
Интересно почему?
Один товарищ этот вопрос задал ему дали ответ "хз"
Хз - это не ответ
Для меня это отмаска чтобы не думали что ты не чего не понимаешь в оружие и в броне технике + танков
Tell me you don't know about weapons without telling me that you don't know about weapons
Woman, даже не сказала почему М4 лучше ☕️
Now put that thing in mud
M4 (5.56) :
- ~700 dollars to produce
- 2.9 kg unloaded
- 500m range
- 760-840mm long (adjustable)
- 368mm barrel
- adjustable gas (runs better if adjusted for environment)
- less likely to get mud inside
- more modular
- better ammunition available for armor penetration (m855a1 / m995)
AK 105 (5.45 x 39)
- ~700-800 dollars to produce
- 3.2 kg unloaded
- 300m range
- 590-830mm long (foldable)
- 314mm barrel
- Runs better without being cleaned
- Some say the ammunition fragments more causing more damage.
- higher manufacturing tolerances so if the gun gets damaged, it's more likely to run
- cleaning kit stored in stock
@@wyvern5810Ак 105 оружие для спецназа а не для военных тупое сравнение
It runs just fine In mud lol check some mud test
Watch the garand thumb mud tests
@@christopherchartier3017 Still it's not as reliable as an AK
Те кто играли в КС давно знают, что эмка шлак и не шотает в голову.
Bro literally if you put off the dust cover of the ak an you put a banana in the spring it will shoot Aldi if you freeze the m4A1 it won't shoot but the ak will
AK47: I still works even there's sand, water, dirt or in cold, hot weathers. How are you gonna beat that?
The original ak47 was very inaccurate to ranges that’s why they made the akm
Women☕
M4 (5.56) :
- ~700 dollars to produce
- 2.9 kg unloaded
- 500m range
- 760-840mm long (adjustable)
- 368mm barrel
- adjustable gas (runs better if adjusted for environment)
- less likely to get mud inside
- more modular
- better ammunition available for armor penetration (m855a1 / m995)
AK 105 (5.45 x 39)
- ~700-800 dollars to produce
- 3.2 kg unloaded
- 300m range
- 590-830mm long (foldable)
- 314mm barrel
- Runs better without being cleaned
- Some say the ammunition fragments more causing more damage.
- higher manufacturing tolerances so if the gun gets damaged, it's more likely to run
- cleaning kit stored in stock
@@wyvern5810вроде в наборе же есть но по крайней мере у АК-74 там в прикладе есть набор очистки да и под стволом есть тоже очиститель
Anybody Knows AK is Better
Anyone know that the Israeli Uzi are better.
@@yeyeaubrey3400ахахахаххаахх, отдача
But the AK is worse? The m4 uses cheaper ammo, has less recoil, is more reliable in adverse conditions and has a longer range
@@cameronmain8421
So Why Nobody Use???
Only Some Weak Militarys Like Philippines and Colombia and Some Other Latins Use Those Weapons ! everyone Prefer HK , AK and FAL Riffles and Some Others Like France And My Country Iran use Their own Riffles
@@OshinAttari the FAL rifles have been outdated since the 90s no top military power uses them, HK makes the 416 which is an updated m4 that the majority of western special forces use, the only countries using AK’s are 3rd world or redundant military powers.
The way the guy rode his bolt forward insread of releasing it made me wanna strangle him
When some random idiot(M4) says that he is greater than god... AK is god.
300m 😂😂
M4 can shoot farther i think
M4 (5.56) :
- ~700 dollars to produce
- 2.9 kg unloaded
- 500m range
- 760-840mm long (adjustable)
- 368mm barrel
- adjustable gas (runs better if adjusted for environment)
- less likely to get mud inside
- more modular
- better ammunition available for armor penetration (m855a1 / m995)
AK 105 (5.45 x 39)
- ~700-800 dollars to produce
- 3.2 kg unloaded
- 300m range
- 590-830mm long (foldable)
- 314mm barrel
- Runs better without being cleaned
- Some say the ammunition fragments more causing more damage.
- higher manufacturing tolerances so if the gun gets damaged, it's more likely to run
- cleaning kit stored in stock
Both weapons platforms are great and have their own pros and cons.
I prefer the M4 though due to modularity.
Title: "M4 Carbine is better than AK! Here's why!"
>shows US military training
its almost like this is a US propaganda channel
AK
Pros:
Big boom
Reliability (gun just is more reliable)
Relatively cheaper and well known
does well in sand and ice
Field stripping very fast
Cons:
Doesn’t do well in mud
If bought standard, very low modularity (only applicable without picatinny rail)
Rock-and-lock system is a tiny bit iffy (personal issue, might be retarded though)
Ammo is a little bit more expensive (only true for Russian rounds, not 5.56)
M4/AR-15
Pros:
Big boom
Ergonomic (personal opinion)
5.56 is plentiful in the states
Accuracy (debatable, depends on personal accuracy and attachments)
Much more modular out of the box
Cons:
A little bit more expensive
Not the best in sand, dust, maybe ice (all of them debatable)
A little bit difficult to clean (if you don’t know what your doing)
Field stripping is a little bit more complicated
Conclusion: both is good, both do the job. One goes boom, the other goes boom. It’s all preference. I truly don’t understand why people argue so much about which is better. It’s a gun, just be happy someone is owning a gun.
This was made at 3 in the morning so I am lightly tired as fuck, so if I missed anything or misspelled some things, feel free to correct me. I am probably wrong about at least one thing here, which is a given, I’m only human, so again, feel free to correct me.
M4 (5.56) :
- ~700 dollars to produce
- 2.9 kg unloaded
- 500m range
- 760-840mm long (adjustable)
- 368mm barrel
- adjustable gas (runs better if adjusted for environment)
- less likely to get mud inside
- more modular
- better ammunition available for armor penetration (m855a1 / m995)
AK 105 (5.45 x 39)
- ~700-800 dollars to produce
- 3.2 kg unloaded
- 300m range
- 590-830mm long (foldable)
- 314mm barrel
- Runs better without being cleaned
- Some say the ammunition fragments more causing more damage.
- higher manufacturing tolerances so if the gun gets damaged, it's more likely to run
- cleaning kit stored in stock
AK: Rusts and still shoots
AR: Rusts and completely blows up
Ребят ну m4a1 реально по фактам лучше и не надо сейчас включать патриотов России и начинать обсирать m4 без каких либо фактов у неё и калибр лучше и кучность и скорострельность. И да если уронить m4 в грязь то она всё равно будет стрелять уже проводили тесты данного автомата и не надо сейчас говорить что ак будет стрелять даже когда его в грязи уделают и тд никто не когда не будет специально марать своё оружия, пусть это делают (патриоты) которые втирают вам что m4 гавно и ак крепче. Также м4 со временем становится лучше и практичнее например 1 версия m4 была m4a1 block 1 и потом 2 3 4 5 и они с каждым разом всё лучше и совершение, и также ак которому уже больше 60 лет до сих пор никак не улучшили такое же цевьё токо добавили монокулярный приклад и да затворная задержка её нет). И последние m4 гораздо больше можно кастомизировать слышите гораздо, можно поменять прицел верхний ресивер приклад затворную задержку и тд, я надеюсь я вас убедил что m4 лучше чем ак и это ещё не все факты я только сказал в краце. Не спорю ак тоже нормальное оружие в плане дешевизны хотя тот же современный ак-12 стоит дороже чем обычная версия m4 block 1 и калибр у ак гавно плохая скорость и фиговая пробитие.
ak 47 is anti water and sand but m16 cant anti water and sand😂
Сказатт что сравниваю АК и М4✅
Показать АК и М4❌
Показать только М4✅
Kalashnikov assault rifle:
-Cheap
-Simple -> Disassemble for cleaning and repring
-Durable
Russia team🇷🇺
↓
Представь что лес, м4 извалялся в говне, нет времени чистить, пздц тебе короче.
Представь что лес, ак извалялся в говне его переехал танк, 2 танка, поднял, опять начал стрелять, заебись одним словом 😎💪🇷🇺
As a proud M4 platform user both in games and irl, i could say that the AK have better penetration and durability, meanwhile the M4 have better recoil control and overall firerate, both are completely up to you whether is the best.
I have an HK-337 and an AK-74M, so i have experienced with both.
57 / 10000
Did you also come to this channel to laugh at the author?
Калашников:
- Ты можешь хоть взорвать меня, я всë равно буду стрелять
М4:
- Прости, но ты взял меня не так, ничего не выйдет
A few things that makes the M4 a better rifle on all aspects in comparison to the AK.
- Considerably much lighter
- has much better efficiency
- much more accurate
- better ergonomics
- M4 can offer higher ammunition capacity
It’s really just comparing a long range carbine to a to short range rifle. (M4 being long range and AK CQC)
it is good if u fighting somewhere like vietnam.
but what if u fight in an environment where IT IS FREEZING COLD LIKE -4⁰c
Самое тупое сравнение что я видел
Его тут вообще нет
Looks like it's his first time ever using the thing
Поэтому армия украины охотится за калагами😂
M4A1 sopmod block 1 has left the chat
M4A1 sopmod block 2 has left the chat
M4A1 sopmod block 3 has left the chat
M4A1 has left the chat
U cant compare to ak to m4 cuz they both are different types of assult rifles
1st place and the title of "Best firearms" rightfully deserved the Kalashnikov or AK-47. It was developed in 1947 by Mikhail Timofeevich Kalashnikov, and since 1949 it entered service with the USSR army. AK and its modifications are the most common and most popular small arms in the world.
M4 (5.56) :
- ~700 dollars to produce
- 2.9 kg unloaded
- 500m range
- 760-840mm long (adjustable)
- 368mm barrel
- adjustable gas (runs better if adjusted for environment)
- less likely to get mud inside
- more modular
- better ammunition available for armor penetration (m855a1 / m995)
AK 105 (5.45 x 39)
- ~700-800 dollars to produce
- 3.2 kg unloaded
- 300m range
- 590-830mm long (foldable)
- 314mm barrel
- Runs better without being cleaned
- Some say the ammunition fragments more causing more damage.
- higher manufacturing tolerances so if the gun gets damaged, it's more likely to run
- cleaning kit stored in stock
@@wyvern5810Like any weapon, the M4 has its drawbacks:
1. Limited firing range. The maximum firing range of the M4 is around 550 meters, which may not be sufficient for some tasks.
2. High rate of fire can lead to rapid depletion of ammunition.
3. Small caliber cartridge (5.56 mm) may be insufficient for hitting targets at long ranges or protected targets.
4. The need for constant maintenance and cleaning of the weapon to keep it in working condition.
5. High cost and complexity of training for the use of the weapon.
@@wyvern5810M4:
- Designed in the United States
- Uses a 5.56mm cartridge
- Has a firing range of around 550 meters
- Has a high rate of fire
- Requires regular maintenance and cleaning
- Is more expensive and complex to train for
AK-47:
- Designed in the Soviet Union
- Uses a 7.62mm cartridge
- Has a firing range of around 400 meters
- Has a lower rate of fire
- Requires less maintenance and cleaning
- Is less expensive and easier to train for
Overall, the M4 is a more modern and advanced weapon, with a higher rate of fire and longer range. However, it requires more maintenance and is more expensive to train for. The AK-47, on the other hand, is a simpler and more reliable weapon that is easier and cheaper to train for, but has a shorter range and lower rate of fire.
Так если м4 лучшая винтовка то почему она не вооружении других стран? Почему вся Африка на ак сидят а не на м4😂?
М4 тупо дороже скорее всего
Но так или иначе у обеих пушек есть свои преимущества
Только вот "говно" АК используется во многих армиях мира, ну если ещё разные там копии учитывать
Автор 😂😂😂 твой iQ примерно как у камня, больше не описать ту ересь, которую ты выкладываешь
Yours isn't any different wither
Даже меньше чем у камня
@@gokusolosngl 💪🇷🇺👉👌🇺🇸🐔😂😂
@@user-tk7wm4kc3d not at all its the other way around
@@gokusolosngl If you consider that Emma and her two mothers are fighting on your side and you are the capital of transgender and gay people, then he is right.
Также ветераны Вьетнама:
Уберите это долбанное M4, дайте мне АК
M4 carbine:difficult mechanism
Ak 47:easy mechanism
The difference in capability is so small that the majority of users wouldn’t be able to use/notice the difference
Смысл этого видео: обычные выстрелы из эмки доказали что калаши ржавое говно которое клинит и ломается постоянно
Это так работает?
АК лучше американских винтовок, вот почему:
Русские: у нас лучше чем у америки
Украинцы: у америки лучше чем у россии
Ak 12: women ☕️
When ak is broken, its still can shoot in mud, water, snow, sand
Трансгендерша не знает паходу что если разобрать половину калаша то всё равно будет стрелять по одиночке перезаряжая😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉
Ak kicked us out of afghanistan😂😂
True but they ended up using our m4s at the end of the war
Есть такая вещь - грязь. Так вот. Количество трупов украинских военных, лежащих рядом с разобраными винтовками серии М, я насчитал столько, что хватит на целый некролог.
Ак, безусловно, менее точен. Но разница в том, что Ак, если так можно выразиться, оружие пролетариата. Его создали в СССР, а там все делали дешево и надежно.
Еще забыл упомянуть, что в бою ты не стреляешь прицельно. Лично я бы не стал так рисковать. Рабочая схема - высунулся, дал очередь туда, где ориентировочно сидит враг, снова спрятался.
P.S Я военный, так что знаю, о чём говорю. А еще основные потери от артилерии и дронов. Добро пожаловать назад в первую мировую.
M4 is upgraded version of M16 so if you want compare AK-47 compare it with M16. If you want to compare M4, compare it with AK-74.
Random African kid: craft ak from 2 sticks and some poops
Average pro-west youtube channel
Man AK looks better than M4
In shooting range
M4✅
AK❌
In reality
M4❌
AK✅
😂😂😂😂
Ak
Плюсы дохуиша модификаций
Не дорогой в отличии от западных винтовок
Не ломается даже в грязи (очень редко ломается)
Проще использовать может стрелять даже без многих вещей в нем
М4-
Дохуя стоит
Меньше пробивная сила
Легко поломать в песке
attention question ! Why does he claim that the M4 is louder than the Kalashnikov assault rifle without having a single confirmation of it in his video .
the 5.56 round is designed to injure someone, that way it takes more people out of the fight because it takes 2 people to get that wounded soldier out, on the other hand the 7.62 is more designed for killing, so really there is no better option, it relies on the situation.
Главное не оружие, а его пользователь
Woman☕
My dad served with a AK platform firearm,he knows its a better rifle than any m4 platform rifle. Theres a reason why its used by so many countries and militaries
your M wedges on the izy after the twentieth horn with cartridges and the AK 47 shoots at least forty does not jam
Дело не в оружии, а в человеке, который его использует. В умелых руках и рогатка смертоносное оружие
It's like he's holding a gun for the first time in his life
this could be BMT, maybe that's true
Полуслепой новобранец еле еле разобрался...🤣
Please stop have you seen the war in ukraine and the soidlers being pushed into combat don't talk this man its probably more experienced the half of the russians in the battlefield right now so don't comment again
mfw when the video has no points to back it up and the comment section is biased only pointing out the bad in the AR platform and good in the AK platform
Todo lo norteamericano es mejor? Fanáticos
The jam on M4 looks lit when you forgot to get the dust out
Крайне спорное утверждение
Should not be at all
М4 лучше Калаша? Автор чето курит нереальное. Мне рассказывали случаи, когда Калаш стрелял даже после сквозного попадания. Я не буду уже говорить, если оба оружия в дерьме измазать.
Американцы сами признают её худшим оружием
А милитари гирль 🤓
Has an SF patch
Doesn't know how to load his rifle correctly