Yet he wouldn't answer where his responses were (very suspicious). Personally, I would have tried that phone number after ensuring her ringer was on to be sure (although she wouldn't know the restraining order would be served to someone with dementia, IF that story is true). But she doesn't have to do that, and him not answering is HIGHLY suspicious. In addition, the burden of proof is just more likely than not. He CLEARLY put naked pictures of her on Facebook (she could have sued for that) because he didn't answer, so he's pretty vengeful. And clearly, he's violent. I'd like to know if he was convicting of violating a restraining order. There was definitely no real proof she set him up (his proof is highly suspicious). She might of set him up, but I do know a lot of people (especially in bad neighborhoods) keep bats by their doors., so her story is definitely plausible. We do know he's vengeful and violent.
She probably could have set up the car thing. She kept saying how she's still paying for it. She seems like she wanted him to pay for it by setting him up again. Maybe I'm wrong, but she can set him up once she could do it again especially without a police report.
And it's typically pretty obvious when someone is on that stuff or has been in the past and he just don't look like it to me.. everything the plaintiff said was sus
She definitely set him up. Most people especially other men typically stay out of domestic situations. People rarely even call the police because they usually end up back together anyway.
I think it was a set up. How you place a restraining order, then text him to come over and he’s arrested for violation??? That seems like he didn’t know and whatever her plot was backfired , but had others on standby. Smh
he had no replies to the texts so honestly i think he texted his own phone number, and since when you do that it replies with a duplicate text, he deleted the duplicate responses- i wish the judge wouldve double checked the phone number
This is BS! JM dropped the ball! The plaintiff is a liar! I believe she set the defendant up and the defendant vandalize her car. They are toxic, the case should have been dismissed.
That would work great, except both litigants already had to dismiss their cases with prejudice in order to participate in this show. TPC is binding arbitration and the only way they can refile is if Judge Milian decides that they are allowed to do so. She uses judicial phrasing and pretends that it's a courtroom but it absolutely is not. The participants are bound by her rulings, but they only allow her to wear a robe and call herself "Judge Milian" because she is a retired judge. She's now an arbitrator, not a sitting judge, and her decisions are arbitration decisions, not judicial ones.
Sorry, but this is a wrong answer from the judge. Milian doesn't seem to care that the plaintiff had guys attack the defendant with baseball bats. And she believes the woman who conveniently "left" her evidence at home. It's a clear case of "believe the woman."
@@ralphtime that's not what she said what she said was she was yelling and the guys came.. there's no proof she had him jumped. He was harassing her he should not have been at her place. He has text with no response 🙄 in his phone who deletes their own response? He is abusive has a history of assault ( stabbed his cousin) she has no enemies and her car gets axe up ?? It's not hard to figure out
I believe she set him up. And I believe he trashed her car in retaliation. In an abusive relationship nobody ever believes the Man. she doesn't have evidence but the judge believes her but says he doesn't have evidence so she doesn't believe him...huh?
If she had a restraining order, then SHE is in violation for asking him to come over. Regardless of an alleged lack of text responses, if she has violated the restraining order, then she has. If everything she says is true, then she is complicit in staying with him. So, he has no evidence of what she has done, but her lack of evidence is given weight.
@@kiokuisme1 legally wrong about what? Her violating the restraining order? Because the OP is 100% correct. They BOTH are in violation if she reaches out and he responds. Victims aren't allowed to entice their abuser to commit further abuse/illegal actions.
The first time he hits you, he is showing you that he will hit you again. When you see that he is violent, he will turn the violence on you. If he is a drug addict or alcoholic, he wont get clean for you. I wish that women would understand this.
You don't stay that long unless it's mutual. It's not 1975. Most females these days in these types of toxic relationships stay cus they like it and are just as abusive as the man is.
@@texasmadehoney1523 she did what every lying woman does..put on the water works for sympathy. He didn't have nothing to say bc he's tired of dealing with her. That's what most people do when they are done with u. You don't deserve anymore words or time. She should have lost.
@@Shellygrrl2573 yes, I agree. I thought you was trying to reply to the guy asking "how so" lol.. I thoroughly understand how this judgment is whack lol glad to see so many of us feel the same way about this one 🤝🏾
I was about to post similar comment. I agree with most of JM's decisions, but thought this was totally wrong. Plaintiff had not one stitch of proof, even after being given additional time to get it 🙄 I'm not saying the defendant doesn't damage the car, but that the plaintiff doesn't come close to proving it. He's a bad dude worth "anger issues", but still innocent til proven guilty.
@@corporateraider77 no she can't. Not when there's no evidence whatsoever or I could randomly point blame on the nearest felon and win a case solely on that. You sound ridiculous. This was a HORRIBLE RULING.
See said she’s dismissing his because of lack of evidence but she’s aware the woman with no evidence. Women really do know how to get sympathy and manipulate the emotions of other women. The worst thing for a man is going before a female judge against another woman. That was terrible.
The man has a recorded history of violence and assault, and the motive and timing (exactly a week after he was in prison) exists that would make someone thrash her car with an axe. That’s what made her rule. If your statement was true she would’ve given pain and suffering, but she didn’t. JM judged rightly
@@sailorminaa there was no evidence. You can only believe that lying woman if you already have a belief in your mind that BM are a certain way. It's called confirmation bias. Nobody in this comment section who isn't bias against BM believe her because she was bold face lying about everything.
@@texasmadehoney1523 I would have the same opinion regardless of the defendant’s race. Your theory on confirmation bias about my opinion on this ruling is wrong.
I would have dismissed both because you knew in the first 2 years what you were dealing with, then it escalates to a beating,and an axe to a car. Then she complains about her life being crazy but YOU ARE CRAZY TO HAVE SPENT 9 YEARS WITH THIS FOOLISHNESS. I am certain this is not her first abusive relationship. Then he's upset about the beating so he probably did use the axe for payback. They both need Therapy and growing up toxic + toxic = jail and cemetery. Smh
After a stabbing, drug problem, restraining order and axing a car, I'm sure his lawyer pounded that politeness into him. He knows he looks bad because no good way to spin it... The most he can do is try his best not to look like a psycho, which he failed
She lied about the police report, so what else did she lie about. And even if he did axe her car, she had had him beaten up with baseball bats, that's quid pro quo. He might have violent tendencies but she is not all there either...
JMM: "did they catch you?" Defendant: "Yes" JMM: "And what did they do?" Defendant, in disbelief: "...they..hit me with bats... I lost my crap the way he responds.
...If you're referring to the Defendant, then please note that a ''''roach'''' is supposed to have antennas at the top of its head. lolololol!!! LMAO!!!
I don't know what's really going on here but she definitely set him up. Called him over there and had three dudes with bats waiting and how the hell do you still owe money on a 2001 car in 2022?? WTF
Right. The female that lied about evidence and tried to deceive the court with a picture of a police report that didn't say what she claimed it said. And the judge knew she was lying from the beginning.
I’m surprised she won. Judge was saying he had no evidence that she set him up to get jumped, but it’s obvious she did, but she also had no evidence from any so called witnesses that seen him messing up her car.
Both of them are crazy. She set him up to get beat up by multiple people and then she sue him. She was crazy for dealing with him harassing her how creepy. 😨
Neither of them had any evidence, and both of them were extremely shady. The entire case should have been dismissed. ("If not you then who?" Uh, what about HER? She already set him up once, she'd do it again. Why didn't she bring the neighbor who supposedly saw him?)
Wow I never disagreed with the judge before on any other her cases but this was wrong. She had no real evidence, got him jumped and she still ruled against because of his past violence record. Then she lied about The so called evidence and still won. I really don’t understand this one.
Right! This one should’ve been a wash where nobody wins anything. She most likely set him up just like he most likely axed her car. This is one of the few cases where I don’t see any logic to the ruling.
Anyone crazy enough to set up an attack that could have been fatal, could also be crazy enough to tear up the car herself. As his "victim" would she have been notified when he was released?
Why not dismiss the case for lack of evidence? she probably fabricated the damages herself for icing on the cake, but the defendant didn't seem mad at that so he probably did do it. This case is trash.
Sadly it seemed more like he knew he wasn't gonna get a fair arbitration. He looked like "whatever, let's get this over with" more than anything. He's used to people not believing him in these types of situations.
I don't understand why people are coming for her so hard when it's pretty obvious that he has a history of being violent with her. So what if she got him back.
Maybe because not everybody is naive or biased and falling for the lies and bs she's spewing. It's so obvious that she's lying and has no evidence. The ruling was completely wrong.
Because men are allowed to be violent and even other women support it. People blame women for everything but especially mens lack of self control. Somehow, if she responds, she’s the problem. It’s really disgusting.
I THINK THE JUDGE SHOULD HAVE GIVEN HIM HIS PAIN AND SUFFERING BECAUSE SHE HAD HIM SET UP!! SHE DIDNT HAVE PROOF RHAT HE DAMAGED HER CAR JUST LIKE HE DIDNT HAVE EVIDENCE THAT HE WAS SET UP!! SHE CRIES HER WAY OUT OF THIS!! YOU GOT THIS ONE WRONG JUDGE!!
This girl is shady. And there was ZERO evidence that he did the damage to her car. JM was wrong on this one. Big time! Normally she'd say you need evidence because I can't just assume he did it with no proof. This was disappointing.
If he came over un announced the guys would not have been ready with the bats . I think it was a set up.
Maybe it was a baseball team that just happened to be there. 😁
I agree
@@mexicanspec hahaha! I know I shouldn't laugh, but that was so funny
It 100% was
She def set him up... and he def did all the stuff she claimed. Toxic all the way around.
So he showed up unannounced, and yet guys with bats just happened to be there and ready to defend her? She definitely set him up.
And the judge knew that story didn't make no sense. She awarded her solely on bias.
Yet he wouldn't answer where his responses were (very suspicious). Personally, I would have tried that phone number after ensuring her ringer was on to be sure (although she wouldn't know the restraining order would be served to someone with dementia, IF that story is true). But she doesn't have to do that, and him not answering is HIGHLY suspicious. In addition, the burden of proof is just more likely than not. He CLEARLY put naked pictures of her on Facebook (she could have sued for that) because he didn't answer, so he's pretty vengeful. And clearly, he's violent. I'd like to know if he was convicting of violating a restraining order.
There was definitely no real proof she set him up (his proof is highly suspicious). She might of set him up, but I do know a lot of people (especially in bad neighborhoods) keep bats by their doors., so her story is definitely plausible. We do know he's vengeful and violent.
I agree. This is bullshit. I feel bad for him.
@@wvrjlwhat proof did she have that he damaged her car? Just as much, or less, that she had him jumped. Neither of them should have got anything.
@@wvrjlalso I must of missed the proof of him putting naked pictures of her up.
I’d be so pissed if I was a judge and a litigant tells me they left their evidence at home. Like what’s the damn point of court then???
Exactly 👍😳 so bizarre hardly any litigants bring evidence. And...then go on TV, then it's YT in perpetuity making a fool of themselves.
She was being lenient by taking a recess to have it faxed in because they both should of lost the case
Exactly. I hate that
@@boogwoog12 woman get a lil extra love
She did it on purpose. She knew there were no witnesses.
She seems hurt and vindictive. I believe she had him beat up
So do I
I believe his drug dealer caught up with him
She look like she does drugs too also
Yes i agree
I believe it was payback for whatever abuse he inflicted on her during the relationship.
The plaintiff left the police report at home because it didn’t say what she claimed it did.
Right. 💯
I believe her
But then got it faxed so she didn’t leave it on purpose.
@@LoveHeatherHeadly And it didn't say what she said it did so...
@@suvariboy actually it did please watch it again, if she was trying to hide it she would’ve never got her boyfriend to send it . 🤷🏽♀️
I don't trust the plaintiff. Period. I think she had him beat up.
She acting like a crackhead while calling him an addict
I think he probably had it coming
Me too
She should have
I'm sure she did but they both seem like a toxic mess.
9:37 When she realized she was losing due to lack of evidence, she pulled out the emotions to try to win with that.
They always do it.....but they want to be treated equally
@@jmcelroy4872h please, like men don't pull the dramatic card... Just look at your comment
it worked
@@VladmirPoopN? What? How was his comment dramatic? I’m a woman and he’s absolutely right. Women cry to manipulate all the time.
He has issues but, she set him up to be jumped and I wouldn’t be surprised if she axed her own car. She seems emotionally challenged enough to do so.
Idk homie didn't deny most of the judge questions that hard like most non-guilty people would have especially about smoking crack or whatever
She looks live Tokyo Tony and she was definitely tweaking
Yeah she did that shit!
I was thinking the same thing about the car.
The way she said, "I dated this gentleman for 9 years" tells me she is bitter and she will keep making his life miserable
Theres so much wrong with this case. She definitely set him up to get his ass whipped tho
yeah...I cnt believe JM did that..I think she should made it a wash
She probably could have set up the car thing. She kept saying how she's still paying for it. She seems like she wanted him to pay for it by setting him up again. Maybe I'm wrong, but she can set him up once she could do it again especially without a police report.
@@MG-im5hm She should, just for the hair style.
Nasty woman
Marilyn, that's funny!😂😂😂
She's when she started talking about him being on drugs I just couldn't stop laughing he looks sober she looks high how big her eyes are
I was thinking the very same thing
And it's typically pretty obvious when someone is on that stuff or has been in the past and he just don't look like it to me.. everything the plaintiff said was sus
bye my aunt eyes were always big , never drugs dummy we dont do dat over here trust he was.
@@texasmadehoney1523 you in somebody business mind yours
@@bernyeesharon who's business am I supposedly in 🙄 it's the internet.. it's everybody's business 😂😂
Just dismiss both cases due to lack of evidence
I agree.
She actually looks more like a substance user than he does. Wish them both well.
Exactly
They both look like they are heavy drug abusers.
@@dd60622 I was thinking the same thing
She looks mean and a user
Like judge Judy said to people presenting themselves in front of her unprepared: «Where did you think you were going!? To the beach?!?»
And if she had been in front of Judge Judy, her judgment probably would have been a big fat 0 dollars.
Yes that's Judge Judy fav kind 😂😂😂
😆🤣
Right! Judge Judy wouldn’t have given her a cent!
Why are there 3 men with bats just chilling outside her house??? The judge doesn’t find that shady or odd at all? I think she set him up.
She definitely set him up. Most people especially other men typically stay out of domestic situations. People rarely even call the police because they usually end up back together anyway.
My homies
The only people who know the truth are The plaintiff, The defendant, and the "Gentlemen" with the bats. 🥺
😁💯
But apparently the guy with the axe needed no proof 😂
@@ralphtime , Lizzie Borden Syndrome. ajajajajaja 😂🤣
She has major weed lips. She still wants him back
LLLLAAAAAWWWWLLLLL 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I think it was a set up. How you place a restraining order, then text him to come over and he’s arrested for violation??? That seems like he didn’t know and whatever her plot was backfired , but had others on standby. Smh
he had no replies to the texts so honestly i think he texted his own phone number, and since when you do that it replies with a duplicate text, he deleted the duplicate responses- i wish the judge wouldve double checked the phone number
@@julia-jn5zx I had no idea about that and just texted myself to try it and it worked
She act like she on a some drugs too,and very low self esteem to put up with abuse for 9years. SMH
Girl go head my aunt never did drugs .. foh before you be standing on youtube lookin dumb
FActs her eyes are dilated
This is BS! JM dropped the ball! The plaintiff is a liar! I believe she set the defendant up and the defendant vandalize her car. They are toxic, the case should have been dismissed.
She had him beat up for sure!
Right!!! And he axed that car for sure 😂😂😂 but she definitely set him up
Definitely when do 3 dudes randomly just have bats at the exact right time🙄girl please and she stole his money too
That good he need his ass whoop lol
I would’ve dismissed the case without prejudice so she could re-file once evidence was presented.
But there is no evidence 😂😂😂
There is no evidence. But they can go off of what’s more likely than not.
Bullshit I think she was lying the whole time
That would work great, except both litigants already had to dismiss their cases with prejudice in order to participate in this show. TPC is binding arbitration and the only way they can refile is if Judge Milian decides that they are allowed to do so. She uses judicial phrasing and pretends that it's a courtroom but it absolutely is not. The participants are bound by her rulings, but they only allow her to wear a robe and call herself "Judge Milian" because she is a retired judge. She's now an arbitrator, not a sitting judge, and her decisions are arbitration decisions, not judicial ones.
@@MichelleLeah but the judge did believe her.
I didn't believe her from the beginning 🙄, but I do believe she set him up
Sorry, but this is a wrong answer from the judge. Milian doesn't seem to care that the plaintiff had guys attack the defendant with baseball bats. And she believes the woman who conveniently "left" her evidence at home. It's a clear case of "believe the woman."
Exactly was. Definitely was the wrong judgment. She didn’t even deny getting him jumped neither.
Judge Judy wouldn’t believe her 😁
It was so bad that he didn’t even bother to call the police. Lol. It was problem a drug dealer he owed
@@ralphtime that's not what she said what she said was she was yelling and the guys came.. there's no proof she had him jumped. He was harassing her he should not have been at her place. He has text with no response 🙄 in his phone who deletes their own response? He is abusive has a history of assault ( stabbed his cousin) she has no enemies and her car gets axe up ?? It's not hard to figure out
Completely agree.
Judge Judy does not go off emotions , she goes off facts 😂
lies.. she will repeatedly refuse to see evidence and rule on if she herself likes you
@Your favorite not everything people bring is considered evidence. People keep calling things evidence but it proves nothing in their case
JJ totally rules based on her "opinion", and she hates dogs
BS
The ex girlfriend absolutely set him up to be beat up!
Cry me a River. You don’t get a badge of honor for staying with someone for 9 years. No kids move the heck on!
Even if you do got kids, move on and co parent. Dont gotta be with them and miserable.
Judge Mathis are you two on drugs😆🧐
No ring, no kids, no SH*T! 😫
WTH…this plaintiff has issues….she brought zero evidence for the judge. I don’t blame judge Milian for needing a shower after this
She definitely set him up, bc men with bats just don't show up...but they are both toxic.
The judge seems biased on some cases because Stevie wonder could see that the plaintiff was lying
Lying and tweaking
I’ll agree with tweaking but why does she appear as a liar?
@@lenoretalon9958 she knew she set that man up
Thank you!!! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 Stevie Wonder lol 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
😂😂
Yah!!!! How u have a police report and not bring it to court??
Probably too lazy and too cheap to go down and pay the 25 cents for it.
@@ButtonsCasey you shouldn’t have to pay for that in the first place but I guess that’s not the point lol
@@mylinm44 this is America
@@SL-rh9og actually, this is behavior of crazy people behaving crazy then getting $ for looking crazier on TV, then YT
She did have the police report finally but the judge didn’t even care about it
I believe she set him up. And I believe he trashed her car in retaliation. In an abusive relationship nobody ever believes the Man. she doesn't have evidence but the judge believes her but says he doesn't have evidence so she doesn't believe him...huh?
I disagree with the judge. She had no evidence and even lied about the evidence she had.
👍
I agree.
I agree; the judge was not right on this one
Yeah the plaintiff lied but defendant apparently a crack head so who you gonna trust lol
10 seconds in I knew she was a liar. I’m sure he did his dirt but you stayed for 9 years and it finally hit her.
She’s lying
ya mom def lied about who was ya father ik dat .
Neighbors don't just have bats running around hun....you clearly set him up.
N in the hood dont play baseball
If she had a restraining order, then SHE is in violation for asking him to come over. Regardless of an alleged lack of text responses, if she has violated the restraining order, then she has.
If everything she says is true, then she is complicit in staying with him. So, he has no evidence of what she has done, but her lack of evidence is given weight.
You are wrong legally.
@@kiokuisme1 legally wrong about what? Her violating the restraining order? Because the OP is 100% correct. They BOTH are in violation if she reaches out and he responds. Victims aren't allowed to entice their abuser to commit further abuse/illegal actions.
Most places, I'm pretty sure I have heard that inviting the subject over immediately voids the order.
@@kiokuisme1explain
I think it’s because he’s the most likely to have done this. But I don’t believe her at all
She set him up you can tell she did dudes don’t just walk around with bats
Exactly. Judge was so off.
@@blessedtobealive she has no enemies and her car gets chopped up and he has a violent history??
@@jacobsladder6715 I'm referring to the set up. She acted like it wasn't a possibility AT ALL.
The first time he hits you, he is showing you that he will hit you again. When you see that he is violent, he will turn the violence on you. If he is a drug addict or alcoholic, he wont get clean for you. I wish that women would understand this.
You don't stay that long unless it's mutual. It's not 1975. Most females these days in these types of toxic relationships stay cus they like it and are just as abusive as the man is.
100% agree!
she was in love ...lol
This most unfair verdict ever
@Gary Mark so obvious.
@@texasmadehoney1523 she did what every lying woman does..put on the water works for sympathy. He didn't have nothing to say bc he's tired of dealing with her. That's what most people do when they are done with u. You don't deserve anymore words or time. She should have lost.
@@Shellygrrl2573 yes, I agree. I thought you was trying to reply to the guy asking "how so" lol.. I thoroughly understand how this judgment is whack lol glad to see so many of us feel the same way about this one 🤝🏾
He looks like an overgrown toddler crossing his arms and mean mugging. He looks like my 4 year old when I tell him no.
She definitely stole his money and set him up…. And he definitely whacked her car!!
Wow so there is no proof he damaged her car don’t matter not a problem…she has guys jump him judge wheres ur proof
Good point.
The proof is the defendant’s violent past. It’s a civil case so the judge can use that as evidence to sway her decision.
I was about to post similar comment. I agree with most of JM's decisions, but thought this was totally wrong. Plaintiff had not one stitch of proof, even after being given additional time to get it 🙄
I'm not saying the defendant doesn't damage the car, but that the plaintiff doesn't come close to proving it. He's a bad dude worth "anger issues", but still innocent til proven guilty.
@@corporateraider77 no she can't. Not when there's no evidence whatsoever or I could randomly point blame on the nearest felon and win a case solely on that. You sound ridiculous. This was a HORRIBLE RULING.
I love when people say, she Texas me.”🤣🤣🤣
Lmbo
She said he had a drug problem , I’m starting to believe she has a drug problem too 😐
😂
She definitely has a drug problem.
See said she’s dismissing his because of lack of evidence but she’s aware the woman with no evidence. Women really do know how to get sympathy and manipulate the emotions of other women. The worst thing for a man is going before a female judge against another woman. That was terrible.
The man has a recorded history of violence and assault, and the motive and timing (exactly a week after he was in prison) exists that would make someone thrash her car with an axe. That’s what made her rule. If your statement was true she would’ve given pain and suffering, but she didn’t. JM judged rightly
@@sailorminaa you o
@@sailorminaa there was no evidence. You can only believe that lying woman if you already have a belief in your mind that BM are a certain way. It's called confirmation bias. Nobody in this comment section who isn't bias against BM believe her because she was bold face lying about everything.
@@texasmadehoney1523 I would have the same opinion regardless of the defendant’s race. Your theory on confirmation bias about my opinion on this ruling is wrong.
I would have dismissed both because you knew in the first 2 years what you were dealing with, then it escalates to a beating,and an axe to a car. Then she complains about her life being crazy but YOU ARE CRAZY TO HAVE SPENT 9 YEARS WITH THIS FOOLISHNESS. I am certain this is not her first abusive relationship. Then he's upset about the beating so he probably did use the axe for payback. They both need Therapy and growing up toxic + toxic = jail and cemetery. Smh
Wow, he was over there with his arms crossed and mugging. I didn’t expect him to sound like he does.
omg me either 😂😂 i was expecting a deep voice and all 😂
he was exceptionally polite!
Definitely not mugging
After a stabbing, drug problem, restraining order and axing a car, I'm sure his lawyer pounded that politeness into him. He knows he looks bad because no good way to spin it... The most he can do is try his best not to look like a psycho, which he failed
Lady with plantiff looking like I hope she don’t mess this up🤣🤣🤣
I just don't understand why people come to court not prepared.
Judge Judy would tell hi to unfold his arms
How they all have bats?
In such cases it's very difficult to tell who's speaking the truth, usually both are guilty for something or the other.
She set him up, that's why she wasn't replying in the text messages
OMG she's has no evidence this is truly unfair...she's playing the crying game. Judge this lady is lying
She lied about the police report, so what else did she lie about. And even if he did axe her car, she had had him beaten up with baseball bats, that's quid pro quo. He might have violent tendencies but she is not all there either...
There is no way 3 dudes just happened to be there with baseball bats. LOL She is not fooling anyone
Nope. She set him up and she had no proof he damaged the car.
At least they didn’t have children together. That’s the silver lining. 🤷🏾♀️
Nine years? You could have left....
JMM: "did they catch you?"
Defendant: "Yes"
JMM: "And what did they do?"
Defendant, in disbelief:
"...they..hit me with bats...
I lost my crap the way he responds.
They both look and sound so ridiculous 😆
He's feminine.
Lmao the way how he had his arm folded 😭😂and his facial expressions
She still owes money on a 01 Camry 🤣🤣🤣🤣. What year was this episode
😂😂😂😂
I feel like she did set him up bc the story she is telling is all over the darn place
Sick of women who talk about love, Freak love, love yourself first.
I think he was set up.
No kids and Nine years?! Was he the only man in town?
People just show up to court any kind of way 😭
...If you're referring to the Defendant, then please note that a ''''roach'''' is supposed to have antennas at the top of its head. lolololol!!! LMAO!!!
You’re in my head 🤣🤣
She looks like she's on drugs.
She definitely set him up
Yeah she set him up for “All he did” to her
Nah she definetly had him set up
I don't know what's really going on here but she definitely set him up. Called him over there and had three dudes with bats waiting and how the hell do you still owe money on a 2001 car in 2022?? WTF
This is a old case
@@JourneyOfKay This case has to be newer than 2010 AT LEAST. If she's still owing money on a 2001 by that time then sheesh....
JM requires evidence from him that she had him jumped, yet she doesn't require evidence from her that he damaged her car. It's BS.
Right. The female that lied about evidence and tried to deceive the court with a picture of a police report that didn't say what she claimed it said. And the judge knew she was lying from the beginning.
Definitely was a “more likely than not” type of case 🤷🏾♀️
I’m surprised she won. Judge was saying he had no evidence that she set him up to get jumped, but it’s obvious she did, but she also had no evidence from any so called witnesses that seen him messing up her car.
Both of them are crazy. She set him up to get beat up by multiple people and then she sue him. She was crazy for dealing with him harassing her how creepy. 😨
You look crazy
Neither of them had any evidence, and both of them were extremely shady. The entire case should have been dismissed. ("If not you then who?" Uh, what about HER? She already set him up once, she'd do it again. Why didn't she bring the neighbor who supposedly saw him?)
she set that man up
Wow I never disagreed with the judge before on any other her cases but this was wrong. She had no real evidence, got him jumped and she still ruled against because of his past violence record. Then she lied about The so called evidence and still won. I really don’t understand this one.
Yeah. Both claims should have been dismissed.
I agree. Neither had evidence.
Right! This one should’ve been a wash where nobody wins anything. She most likely set him up just like he most likely axed her car.
This is one of the few cases where I don’t see any logic to the ruling.
if you have never disagreed with the judge then you are a simpleton. you will follow whomever leads without asking questions
Judge so funny with the random outburst,, they can be in the middle of telling their story “did u 🪓 the car!!!!” 😂😂😂😂💀💀💀
She is clearly lying
Anyone crazy enough to set up an attack that could have been fatal, could also be crazy enough to tear up the car herself.
As his "victim" would she have been notified when he was released?
I’m sorry but she shouldn’t have been awarded the money because even though he had motive there was no proof.
First time I've not agreed with judge. There was no evidence it was him just suspicion which isn't enough
She for sure set him up , she is hurt!
I love his hair. More people should have hair like that
It’s called locs
@@ethiopia_7607 I have blue ones
Why not dismiss the case for lack of evidence? she probably fabricated the damages herself for icing on the cake, but the defendant didn't seem mad at that so he probably did do it. This case is trash.
Sadly it seemed more like he knew he wasn't gonna get a fair arbitration. He looked like "whatever, let's get this over with" more than anything. He's used to people not believing him in these types of situations.
I don't understand why people are coming for her so hard when it's pretty obvious that he has a history of being violent with her. So what if she got him back.
Maybe because not everybody is naive or biased and falling for the lies and bs she's spewing. It's so obvious that she's lying and has no evidence. The ruling was completely wrong.
Because men are allowed to be violent and even other women support it. People blame women for everything but especially mens lack of self control. Somehow, if she responds, she’s the problem.
It’s really disgusting.
I THINK THE JUDGE SHOULD HAVE GIVEN HIM HIS PAIN AND SUFFERING BECAUSE SHE HAD HIM SET UP!! SHE DIDNT HAVE PROOF RHAT HE DAMAGED HER CAR JUST LIKE HE DIDNT HAVE EVIDENCE THAT HE WAS SET UP!! SHE CRIES HER WAY OUT OF THIS!! YOU GOT THIS ONE WRONG JUDGE!!
“But did he die?”
2:07 the face you make when the person infront of you at the grocery store is looking for coupons
This girl is shady. And there was ZERO evidence that he did the damage to her car. JM was wrong on this one. Big time! Normally she'd say you need evidence because I can't just assume he did it with no proof. This was disappointing.
She is evil.... and JM fell for her lies.
She set him up
She definitely been through some things and told those guys, if he shows up best his ass lol
She’s clearly lying.
They guys with the bats probably 🪓 her car because she didn’t pay them for beating him up!
Judging from her lips…she smokes hella blunts
Agreed 😂😂😂
I’m not through watching but I’m having trouble believing the plaintiff
For 9 years, and yet, you stayed?🤷♀️🤷♂️
Since when can someone be held liable for something when there is no actual proof they did it?
8:03 “it’s a 2001 Toyota Camry- and I STILL owe money on it” 😂😂😂 the fuck