I saw a video of another A350 Pilot retirement. He knew what was going to happen because he has to inform the passengers that the plane is not on fire xD@@Ratpack81
Heres something you may find interesting. :) The name of my country has nothing to do with the interesting and delicious bird ''turkey'', well let me explain. :) Name of my country has always been Turkiye, that is Turk-iye, where the -iye suffix means ''land of/belonging to''... ...just like the Latin suffix -ia in such countries as Latv-ia, Roman-ia, Eston-ia, Austr-ia, Austral-ia etc etc. Another example; decades ago Czechoslovakia Republic changed it's name to Czech Republic and a few years ago changed that to Czechia (that is Czech-ia). Anyways, most likely the Latin -ia suffix was derived from the Turkish version -iye, as Turkish is much much older. Because in old times people of different languages could only pronounce it as their languages allowed them, we got various differences in spelling like Turchia (in Italian), Turquie (in French) and Turkey (in English) all trying to resemble the pronounciation of ''Turk-ia'' thus Turkiye. Mind you this was way BEFORE the animal we currently know as 'turkey'' was found by the europeans when they explored the north americas.... ...they came across the bird and thought it was a specie of the fowl/chicken they had been buying from the country of Turkiye at the time, so they named the bird ''Turkey Fowl'' meaning ''Turkish Chicken''..... ....just like how a dog breed is known as German Shepherd (because it's from Germany), Rhodesian Ridgeback (because it's from Rhodesia), American Bulldog, British Terrier, Greek Harehound etc etc. In time you don't get to call the Greek Harehound as simply as ''Greek''; or you don't call the British Terrier as ''British''; or the German Shepherd as ''German'', but in time the Turkish Fowl started to be called just ''turkey'', and has been going on for hundreds of years. Now in 2023, this is causing confusion, especially when we have people across the world unable to point to their OWN country on the atlas, this ''confusion over the naming'' needed to be corrected. So my country decided to rectify this confusion that has been going on for so long and corrected the name in other languages to Türkiye, which it always was, we basically didn't change the name of our country, we changed the mistake made in the English language. : ) So, there's some tid bit information for you to have a great day, if you read upto this point you have a great night too, ohh just have a wonderfull life. : ) Best wishes. ;)
@@atom608 I don't like flying and take off is definitely my least favorite part. Touching the tarmac and feeling that relief for a moment only for then to feel the engines kick back into action...pure torture.
Whoa, that A380 landing was intense! It looked more like a precision maneuver than just a firm touchdown - it's incredible how the pilots skillfully handled the situation. It reminds me of the precision and control you'd want when navigating a busy parking lot, maybe even an Express Parking scenario where every move matters. Kudos to the skilled pilots for ensuring everyone's safety and making it look like a well-choreographed performance!
@@EdOeuna Nor really, that wasn’t a go around that was a bulked landing! Manual application of full thrust, hold the aircraft attitude, accelerate to vref then slowly rotate to 15 degrees nose up. Wait a second or two and press TOGA, go around procedure from that point. Looks like it was flown perfectly to me.
@@greglawrance6086 - reread what you wrote and see why you’re wrong. It is a baulked landing with a go around, but they buggered up the go-around portion by flying level for a few seconds before the ridiculous pull up manoeuvre.
@EdOeuna Standard baulked landing procedure for the 777 is to maintain aircraft attitude, accepting runway touchdown if necessary, aggressively apply maximum thrust, slowly rotate at vref to achieve a 15 degree pitch angle. Pause and then press TOGA. After that convert to a standard go around. TOGA on the 777 is inhibited after touchdown hence manual thrust. The accelerate level to vref is to prevent a tail strike. 15 degrees is used to prevent speed runaway with full thrust applied. As I said, looked pretty good to me.
@@EdOeuna that is not the reason i believe. i think it was because of them trying to get out of a tailstrike position, since 777's are really long. (I might be wrong)
@@nathonn9334 - the rotation following a balled landing is exactly the same as for a take off. Rotate towards 15°. Nothing to do with preventing tail strikes. Just terrible pilot ability.
There's always something very majestic about a water salute. I love seeing displays of respect in the aviation world!! A great example for all of us to follow. Thank you for another 3 minutes installment!🫡
That Air France landing is a classic Pilot Induced Oscillation (PIO). You can't mess with big aircraft that much. It takes time to get a reaction because they're so big and they carry huge inertia. You end up with greater and greater oscillation because every reaction is seemingly 180 degrees out. What you need to do hold neutral, allow it to stabilise, then slow yourself down.
It’s a constant wind. It’s pretty easy to deal with in large aircraft like this. Worst case is you land in the crab and let the wheels bare the brunt. It appears they also forget to put ailerons into wind which is why the plane kept bouncing and the left wing kept lifting.
That A380 did more than a "firm" touchdown. That was an "We're going to inspect everything as soon as we get all the passengers and cargo off this plane" kind of controlled crash.
@@bikenyan autorotation is what you do if you have an engine failure (most common reason) in a helicopter. The basics is that you descend quickly so that the airflow starts going up through the blades causing them to windmill and keep spinning. You then use the energy in the blades to stop your descent and land, without needing any engine power. Of course this being a Robinson the amount of energy stored in the rotor is not much. Hence the horn telling the pilot the rotor rpm had dropped below safe limit. It sounds scary and crazy, but you only need a small patch of land to put it down safely, whereas in an aeroplane you have to hit the ground at speed and hope for the best. Or if you’re in the US, land on a freeway and make everyone get out of your way 😂
@@soaringvulture absolutely. I was never fully comfortable with autos during my initial flight training. Even though I could do them and knew what I was doing. I had to practice a fair bit to get rid of the fear factor. I was quite young at the time though.
Dude, I'm an A&P at a flight school that has 18 R44's.......we do hundreds of autos a month. It's a standard EP. What are you supposed to do? Not train?
@@jim2laneRobinsons are cheap, hence their popularity. But I have to agree, it’s not a model I’d get back in to fly again. And it’s good they’re practicing, as it’s especially important to get it right in a Robbi.
The rate of descent of Air France doesn’t look too excessive, the bounce was probably due to high “energy”, I suspect they came in at slightly higher speed or high thrust setting and then chopped the power a bit late (that’s why ground spoiler automatically deployed slightly later)
Not enough into wind aileron. Auto thrust automatically reduces thrust on touchdown. Correct technique is to use rudder to straighten the aircraft to the runway, introduce and HOLD into wind aileron and flare a little more due to the lateral rotation.
It was more of PIO event. Watch how much elevator deflection there is just about 10 feet from touchdown. Plus he didn't maintain upwind aileron post touchdown.
The Lufthansa a380 with the smoke is registered as D-AIMM. On the same day 29/10/23 it flew back to Munich without incident. Interestingly I was on that exact plane on my flight from Munich to Bangkok on 30/10/23 Source flight radar 24 and the original upload clip.
The tiles of the videos on this channel are usually inaccurate and meaningless. I could speculate about how the pilot might have mishandled the airplane, but the specifics don't really matter. Tough winds and less than adroit handling lead to a less than pretty arrival. It's not like long-haul pilots get a lot of practice handling the airplane these days.
74gear will definitely talk about the Air France landing. Nose gear first is an absolute no go. Pilot induced oscillation right before it, reverse on just 2 out of 3 wheels, that was a really terrible landing. I hope it was a training flight
That's not too bad, I'm a pilot. It's tough up there w a 20knt cross wind, AND a full load. It looks a lot worse than what it is. He LANDED! No damage, or injuries. From small to large, and HUGE planes., fighting Mother Nature and the wind sometimes is a quite a handful.
that was quite dangerous to put weight on front strut. i have no idea what they were thinking, but it could lead to nose gear collapse.. never ever ever do that.
I'd say that 777 landing couldn't have gone much better, considering that the pilots' quick reaction to a sudden wind gust entirely saved the plane from some serious damage.
Japan airlines flight didn't need a go around, it's main landing gear touched down, pilot just had to use the horizontal stabilizers to lower the nose gear & it was done, but instead took off again at such a low speed & altitude creating unwanted stress & tension on passengers & self.
Unless you're current and qualified on the 777, your attempt at judgement of one's flying ability is simply an uninformed opinion. He was running out of wet runway to stop...and he had probably 80% of flying speed at the touchdown. They made the right decision.
An actual touchdown doesn't involve any bounce. The nose gear is clearly not as tough as the main one, and all it wanted here was to smash and bounce on the ground hard just like the main. So all you were suggesting was to help this but thankfully the pilot prevented it instead ,probably at the cost of more main gear bouncing. But as airspeed decreases, the tailstrike pitch decreases as well ,which makes following Aft yoke inputs to prevent damage on the nose gear more dangerous, and not to mention all the valuable runway lenght that was already wasted during this whole mess. Which is why a go around is a good decision after a bounced landing.
QANTAS canned water salutes a few years ago, green washing campaign via the leprechaun;) My BIL's last ever flight as Captain from SFO to SYD he had to be content with ripping off his uniform shirt in the arrivals hall😁
Unless the negative commentators are current and qualified pilots on the 777, their armchair attempt at judgement of one's flying ability is simply an uninformed opinion. AF landing was salvageable and in those conditions getting safely on the ground (as inelegant as it was) was achieved. JAL probably could have pulled it off as well...but they were running out of runway...better to "live to fight another day" - don't be "afraid to go around". JAL had probably 80% of flying speed at the touchdown. They made the right decision.
Also, Narita can get quite a bit of wind. It being a JAL pilot, he's probably got a good handle on the conditions there and knows when the go-around is in order.
![[LAST ONE] B777 JFK 🇺🇸 New York | LANDING 04R | 4K Cockpit View | ATC & Crew Communications](/img/1.gif)
That water salute was very touching. I gave my neighbour's car a water salute in the early hours of Saturday morning. I'd had a good night.
I fist read this as "cat" and was all 😡😡😡
@@Bullieghi gave that to your sister too.
First
@@Ea-Nasir_Copper_Co😅😅😅
@@micco6020 First what?
That A350 and the water "fontaines" going over it with the sunset in the background looked really awesome. Respect to the retired captain!
I really hope it was a surprise and he wasn't expecting it 🥹
@@Ratpack81 His retirement, lol!? Just kidding!
Emotional just watching it 😭
I saw a video of another A350 Pilot retirement. He knew what was going to happen because he has to inform the passengers that the plane is not on fire xD@@Ratpack81
Heres something you may find interesting. :)
The name of my country has nothing to do with the interesting and delicious bird ''turkey'', well let me explain. :)
Name of my country has always been Turkiye, that is Turk-iye, where the -iye suffix means ''land of/belonging to''...
...just like the Latin suffix -ia in such countries as Latv-ia, Roman-ia, Eston-ia, Austr-ia, Austral-ia etc etc. Another example; decades ago Czechoslovakia Republic changed it's name to Czech Republic and a few years ago changed that to Czechia (that is Czech-ia).
Anyways, most likely the Latin -ia suffix was derived from the Turkish version -iye,
as Turkish is much much older.
Because in old times people of different languages could only pronounce it as their languages allowed them, we got various differences in spelling like Turchia (in Italian), Turquie (in French) and Turkey (in English) all trying to resemble the pronounciation of ''Turk-ia'' thus Turkiye.
Mind you this was way BEFORE the animal we currently know as 'turkey'' was found by the europeans when they explored the north americas....
...they came across the bird and thought it was a specie of the fowl/chicken they had been buying from the country of Turkiye at the time, so they named the bird ''Turkey Fowl'' meaning ''Turkish Chicken''.....
....just like how a dog breed is known as German Shepherd (because it's from Germany), Rhodesian Ridgeback (because it's from Rhodesia), American Bulldog, British Terrier, Greek Harehound etc etc.
In time you don't get to call the Greek Harehound as simply as ''Greek''; or you don't call the British Terrier as ''British''; or the German Shepherd as ''German'', but in time the Turkish Fowl started to be called just ''turkey'', and has been going on for hundreds of years.
Now in 2023, this is causing confusion, especially when we have people across the world unable to point to their OWN country on the atlas, this ''confusion over the naming'' needed to be corrected.
So my country decided to rectify this confusion that has been going on for so long and corrected the name in other languages to Türkiye, which it always was, we basically didn't change the name of our country, we changed the mistake made in the English language. : )
So, there's some tid bit information for you to have a great day, if you read upto this point you have a great night too, ohh just have a wonderfull life. : )
Best wishes. ;)
The part of the go around with the Japanese 777....the climb out, wow.
Yeah i know right it almost looked like some sort of move they would do at an air show. wouldnt of been nice as a passenger on that one
"Wow" is right.
They really messed up that bulked landing procedure.
The Japanese pilot did that because people didn't applaud when he landed.😅
@@atom608 I don't like flying and take off is definitely my least favorite part. Touching the tarmac and feeling that relief for a moment only for then to feel the engines kick back into action...pure torture.
Damn, the 777 pilot was really exited to get back home
Yea!
0:27 History almost repeating
Whoa, that A380 landing was intense! It looked more like a precision maneuver than just a firm touchdown - it's incredible how the pilots skillfully handled the situation. It reminds me of the precision and control you'd want when navigating a busy parking lot, maybe even an Express Parking scenario where every move matters. Kudos to the skilled pilots for ensuring everyone's safety and making it look like a well-choreographed performance!
Wow! Talk about respect with this pilot. He did good in his life. Took people everywhere
you can tell the same about every single bus driver
That a380 farted
😂😂
Lol
Feel bad for the next aircraft 😢
lol
lol
That japan 777 was one hell of a steep climb, passengers would of been like wtf
I had that happen to me once at Narita while on board a JAL 787… it feels incredible and I was able to get it all on camera 😀
Steep climb because they buggered up the go-around.
@@EdOeuna Nor really, that wasn’t a go around that was a bulked landing! Manual application of full thrust, hold the aircraft attitude, accelerate to vref then slowly rotate to 15 degrees nose up. Wait a second or two and press TOGA, go around procedure from that point. Looks like it was flown perfectly to me.
@@greglawrance6086 - reread what you wrote and see why you’re wrong. It is a baulked landing with a go around, but they buggered up the go-around portion by flying level for a few seconds before the ridiculous pull up manoeuvre.
@EdOeuna Standard baulked landing procedure for the 777 is to maintain aircraft attitude, accepting runway touchdown if necessary, aggressively apply maximum thrust, slowly rotate at vref to achieve a 15 degree pitch angle. Pause and then press TOGA. After that convert to a standard go around. TOGA on the 777 is inhibited after touchdown hence manual thrust. The accelerate level to vref is to prevent a tail strike. 15 degrees is used to prevent speed runaway with full thrust applied. As I said, looked pretty good to me.
0:25 why does the left engine look weird
0:59 what a spectacular climb and go-around by Japan 777-300. Too handsome!!
What
Except they buggered the procedure and that sudden pitch up was a panicked response to accelerating towards a flap limit speed.
@@EdOeuna that is not the reason i believe. i think it was because of them trying to get out of a tailstrike position, since 777's are really long.
(I might be wrong)
@@nathonn9334 - the rotation following a balled landing is exactly the same as for a take off. Rotate towards 15°. Nothing to do with preventing tail strikes. Just terrible pilot ability.
There's always something very majestic about a water salute. I love seeing displays of respect in the aviation world!! A great example for all of us to follow.
Thank you for another 3 minutes installment!🫡
0:41 Ryanair Executives: Send that pilot an application!
😆
Monsieur, are you sure you didn't mean an invitation?
That Air France landing is a classic Pilot Induced Oscillation (PIO).
You can't mess with big aircraft that much. It takes time to get a reaction because they're so big and they carry huge inertia. You end up with greater and greater oscillation because every reaction is seemingly 180 degrees out.
What you need to do hold neutral, allow it to stabilise, then slow yourself down.
Nice video!
0:15 history nearly repeated again 🫣
Fedex 80
The Air France 777 - look at the windsock in the right of the picture, it's nearly pulled over the wind is so strong... White knuckle landing!
For the passengers AND the pilots! 😬😰😳🛬
Nah.
It’s a constant wind. It’s pretty easy to deal with in large aircraft like this. Worst case is you land in the crab and let the wheels bare the brunt. It appears they also forget to put ailerons into wind which is why the plane kept bouncing and the left wing kept lifting.
@@EdOeuna as usual, I agree with your assessment.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 - two professional pilots agree. No surprise there!
0:18 fedex incident
1:10 Must have have been pretty scary for the passengers inside.
That A380 did more than a "firm" touchdown. That was an "We're going to inspect everything as soon as we get all the passengers and cargo off this plane" kind of controlled crash.
AF landing was during Ciaran storm with 141 km/h gusts on Paris.
Windy AF.
Enjoyed that auto-rotation. My first and last one was in the BRNC Wasp in 1978. Exciting stuff.
I am not a pilot, so what was going on with the helicopter clip? Thanks.
@@bikenyan autorotation is what you do if you have an engine failure (most common reason) in a helicopter. The basics is that you descend quickly so that the airflow starts going up through the blades causing them to windmill and keep spinning.
You then use the energy in the blades to stop your descent and land, without needing any engine power.
Of course this being a Robinson the amount of energy stored in the rotor is not much. Hence the horn telling the pilot the rotor rpm had dropped below safe limit.
It sounds scary and crazy, but you only need a small patch of land to put it down safely, whereas in an aeroplane you have to hit the ground at speed and hope for the best.
Or if you’re in the US, land on a freeway and make everyone get out of your way 😂
@@MeppyMan That has to be a scary moment in a helicopter pilot's training. At least the first time.
@@soaringvulture absolutely. I was never fully comfortable with autos during my initial flight training. Even though I could do them and knew what I was doing. I had to practice a fair bit to get rid of the fear factor. I was quite young at the time though.
Performing an auto-rotation in a Robinson? That man is taking his life in his hands!
Dude, I'm an A&P at a flight school that has 18 R44's.......we do hundreds of autos a month. It's a standard EP. What are you supposed to do? Not train?
@@aikimechanic just giving you a hard time my man 😉. I say that because Robinsons have attained a bit of a reputation as a widow maker
@@jim2laneRobinsons are cheap, hence their popularity. But I have to agree, it’s not a model I’d get back in to fly again.
And it’s good they’re practicing, as it’s especially important to get it right in a Robbi.
@@aikimechanic i'm fine with the autorotation. it's the "robinson" part that's a bit worrying...
3:02 minutes*
777 Pilot probably flew for Ryanair before he joined Air France
If that were the case he wouldn't have botched the landing.
@@theHDRflightdeck Just drove it in, but that would have been MUCH better.
what?@@chrisschack9716
You're so funny and original...not. 🥱
Lmao have your ever thought of making a career in comedy?
The rate of descent of Air France doesn’t look too excessive, the bounce was probably due to high “energy”, I suspect they came in at slightly higher speed or high thrust setting and then chopped the power a bit late (that’s why ground spoiler automatically deployed slightly later)
They should have gone around, they started porpiosing.
Not enough into wind aileron. Auto thrust automatically reduces thrust on touchdown. Correct technique is to use rudder to straighten the aircraft to the runway, introduce and HOLD into wind aileron and flare a little more due to the lateral rotation.
It was more of PIO event. Watch how much elevator deflection there is just about 10 feet from touchdown. Plus he didn't maintain upwind aileron post touchdown.
@@chrisschack9716 They should stick to selling onions
That is cool way to celebrate retiring captain‼️😎
The Lufthansa a380 with the smoke is registered as D-AIMM. On the same day 29/10/23 it flew back to Munich without incident. Interestingly I was on that exact plane on my flight from Munich to Bangkok on 30/10/23 Source flight radar 24 and the original upload clip.
That's interesting.
Why would it not fly back to Munich? A firm landing is just a firm landing - not incident.
Better a bit firm than hopping like the AF….
I tried to give my cat a water salute recently. He didn't appreciate it as much.
Thanks for the giggle.
Congratulations captain on your equal numbers of take offs and Landings. Retirement is great. No Clocks ⏰
and no FAT FAT paychecks
@@verifiedtoxicangel2411 But the hours are great!
0:36 me landing in ptfs be like
I was about to say that
0:28 FedEx 80 flashbacks 💀
Uep
Can someone explain to me what exactly goes wrong as the title says? Plane landed intact and no passengers were injured...?
The tiles of the videos on this channel are usually inaccurate and meaningless. I could speculate about how the pilot might have mishandled the airplane, but the specifics don't really matter. Tough winds and less than adroit handling lead to a less than pretty arrival. It's not like long-haul pilots get a lot of practice handling the airplane these days.
It's an opportunity for aviation specialists - and the occasional know-it-all - to display their immense knowledge in the comments section.
Always take off and landing the nervous part of aviation, but each beautiful, thanks.
the 777 from air france wanted to be fedex flight 80 i think
2:08 You sure that isn't Aero Sucre flying at max altitude?
The first one looking like a certain fedex flight…
1:33 holy cow!
I hope the AeroSucre crews are still alive! Haven't seen a clip of them in a while.
the climb rate of those 777 looks ludicrous because of their size
The pilot messed up the go-around and probably had the PM screaming “speed” at him before the pull up.
Nice!
74gear will definitely talk about the Air France landing. Nose gear first is an absolute no go. Pilot induced oscillation right before it, reverse on just 2 out of 3 wheels, that was a really terrible landing. I hope it was a training flight
Training flight whether planned that way or not.
JAL P1 really superb,,,,last minutes decision go around, well trained in simulator ,,,,big salute P1 👍🎉❤
Superb? Not from my comfy chair.
That was anything but superb. He definitely got a call.
That's not too bad, I'm a pilot. It's tough up there w a 20knt cross wind, AND a full load.
It looks a lot worse than what it is.
He LANDED!
No damage, or injuries.
From small to large, and HUGE planes., fighting Mother Nature and the wind sometimes is a quite a handful.
Last clip
Thats a awesome gesture.. I bet that Cpt was close to crying.....
You are crazy. Pilots are never close to crying. I stopped crying 3 months after I was born and never cried again.
You better see a doctor then
@@theypeedonmyrug oh no, you fixed me. Such a harsh response and it made me cry.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183lol. I think that’s just because you’re Dutch. 😂 I cry that I don’t get to fly anymore! 🚁
@@MeppyMan well, how do we get you to fly again? Let’s work on that.
Are you on the east coast?
That R-44 landing was smoother than 90%+ of the RyanAir landings.
It was also smoother than 90%+ of other Robinson's "landings" that are also called crashes...
That AirFrance 777 was doing the "Ickey Woods Shuffle."
Definitely need to practice for those engine failures in a Robinson.
And what to do when you hear that horn go off mid flight lol.
0:30 Gadonk-gadonk! 😂
0:31 history almost repeated itself
2:20 How is it a "stunning low pass" as you put it 2:08?
flight 80: no no no wait wait wait wait wait
Excellent Simulated Emergency Landing by R-44 Pilot. Spot on.
Nice sounding A340! 😃
The fact that the airfrance 777 bounced and tilted a bit reminds me of FedEx 80
I love this channel so much!!!!
that was quite dangerous to put weight on front strut. i have no idea what they were thinking, but it could lead to nose gear collapse.. never ever ever do that.
Porpoising with a 777 is quite an achievement :D
The Lufthansa A380 landed so hard that a soul was pushed out of the runway
With the Japan Airlines, was that go around necessary? Seems like they had their 'feet' well on the ground, just a bit wobbly.
Where was this A380 landing? Which airport?
Love the water salute
I didn't know about the "water salute". It's very cool!
were you just born yesterday?!?!
The cameraman in the first one was probably a source of motivation for the big bird to succeed in it’s landing😂❤❤❤✈️✈️✈️
0:29
Can we all agree that history almost reprated itself?
Mad respect to that pilot
2:37 useful for Baptisms too?
Awesome 👍
Thanks for sharing 👌
The only time a landing "goes wrong" is if there is a crash.
Keep your crosswind controls in, Air France…even after touchdown!
🇯🇵 Japanese spotters = best spotters. Zero histrionic behaviour.
I'd say that 777 landing couldn't have gone much better, considering that the pilots' quick reaction to a sudden wind gust entirely saved the plane from some serious damage.
This AF 777 video is now famous.
Viral !
Always interesting, always good footage.
2:18 I’d lose my mind from excitement if I saw that
1:26 it took 7 seconds to get engines back to full power after TOGA
Good Luck
777 almost repeats history
2:23 Falling parts protection.
Air france insane PIO.
0:27 exactly the same thing like Korean Air did in Tokyo Narita
0:35 - there is a reason why AF pilots have a nickname "air chance"
Putting the "Air" in Air France on that first one.
1:17 TO/GO !
Every time I see a water salute I always think about that time the fireies accidentally used foam retardant instead of water 😂
Yes that was an F22 or some other overpriced piece of American junk I seem to remember
@@billb7876 lol calling the best fighter in the world a "piece of American junk". It brang a smile to my face =)
I remember the time a girl fell out of that Korean airliner, was covered in fire foam, and then rub over and killed by a fire truck.
Japan airlines flight didn't need a go around, it's main landing gear touched down, pilot just had to use the horizontal stabilizers to lower the nose gear & it was done, but instead took off again at such a low speed & altitude creating unwanted stress & tension on passengers & self.
No, it absolutely did. With that second bounce it was *way* long
Unless you're current and qualified on the 777, your attempt at judgement of one's flying ability is simply an uninformed opinion. He was running out of wet runway to stop...and he had probably 80% of flying speed at the touchdown. They made the right decision.
Three minutes plus one second! 🤩
Nice water salute!
i love this channel bcuz he show the video first that put in thumbnail
The JAL 777 didn’t actually need to go around , it had touched fully , all it needed was a little nose down pressure and reverse thrust
An actual touchdown doesn't involve any bounce. The nose gear is clearly not as tough as the main one, and all it wanted here was to smash and bounce on the ground hard just like the main.
So all you were suggesting was to help this but thankfully the pilot prevented it instead ,probably at the cost of more main gear bouncing.
But as airspeed decreases, the tailstrike pitch decreases as well ,which makes following Aft yoke inputs to prevent damage on the nose gear more dangerous, and not to mention all the valuable runway lenght that was already wasted during this whole mess.
Which is why a go around is a good decision after a bounced landing.
When the landing isn't smooth, it creates a smoothie inside.
Fantastic video!😸
ACCURATES.S,S.
Ouch!!! That hurt to watch 🫣 Air France
QANTAS canned water salutes a few years ago, green washing campaign via the leprechaun;) My BIL's last ever flight as Captain from SFO to SYD he had to be content with ripping off his uniform shirt in the arrivals hall😁
Unless the negative commentators are current and qualified pilots on the 777, their armchair attempt at judgement of one's flying ability is simply an uninformed opinion.
AF landing was salvageable and in those conditions getting safely on the ground (as inelegant as it was) was achieved. JAL probably could have pulled it off as well...but they were running out of runway...better to "live to fight another day" - don't be "afraid to go around". JAL had probably 80% of flying speed at the touchdown. They made the right decision.
Could you pull it off in a cockpit, with one or two copilots behind you?
Also, Narita can get quite a bit of wind. It being a JAL pilot, he's probably got a good handle on the conditions there and knows when the go-around is in order.
But the JAL pilot seriously messed up the go-around.
There are several transport pilots critical of that landing. I'd call them informed and those who praise it uninformed.
0:29 shouldn't the pilot go to second round in that situation?
Sometimes I leave a puff of smoke after a firm touchdown, just like that as well
That AirFrance flight could've turning into the next flight 80...
argentina spotters really gotta work on not being so shaky 😂