I have a bb58, I also owned a Rolex sub 16610, I kept the sub after buying the bb58 for 1 year to see if I would miss it or which I would prefer to wear, every time I went for the black bay, twice I was in a tricky situation where it seemed as though too much interest shown in me wearing my sub, once on holiday abroad, and again in London, also my son loved the sub, but as much as I love my son a great deal more than a watch, and I didn’t want to hang a target around his neck when I left it to him. The purchase of my 16610 was something that bought as a sort of recognition (to myself) of the hard work I have done to achieve what I have as a sole trader for 50 years. I sold the sub for almost 3 times what I purchased it for 10 years ago, and bought my boy (38 yrs), you have guessed it, a bb 58 he loves it, just like I loved the sub when I first bought it, terrified of scratching it, couldn’t stop lifting my sleeve up to look at it, and he only wears his at weekends !! I never took the 16610 off my wrist, decorating, building ,gardening etc, but approaching 70yrs if I was (seriously) threatened for the bb58 I would give it up in a heart beat, move on and buy another bb58. Something I may not of done for the 16610. And something my son would would never have done !! I enjoy my watch, and prefer it more than the 16610, it is never off my wrist
Too small imo. Did you try it on? I tried it on. I don't see any improvement over the 58. Clasp is better and crown has been improved, but the small size is a fad. Give it 5 years, it will go out of fashion. Best to stick with the classic 58.
I also have a BB58 black dial and no regret till now. I will wait for a BB54 blue dial 😊 Congrats for your new baby. Thanks for sharing this comparison. I was looking to see one.
I love it when people like Tudor. From a business model point of view, I prefer them to Rolex. Oh, and by the way, Tudor makes some great watches. If they had a thin GMT movement, they would have it all. Some guy on a watch site was trying to guess what the new Rolex releases would be. I told to him to wait and see. When it does come out, you won’t be able to buy it anyway. You’ll have plenty of time to think about it while you wait a year or more. Then, if you have purchased enough things you didn’t want, you may get the call. Pass…
I love it, as I loved the original black bay, the 925 silver. The blue bay, the BB Pro, the Pelagos 39…. But they bring out so much the hype shifts and models can go into the background
BB54 is better than BB58. Thanks to its more measured size and the red index which has disappeared, it seems more refined. It is therefore more versatile. However, although it is beautiful, I have a little trouble with its fake vintage look because of its fake rivets. A little bad taste I think. I'm afraid I'll end up getting bored watching it in the long run. So I hesitate between the BB54 and the incredible PELAGOS 39.
Great to see them side by side. Thanks d love to see the 54 on a variety of straps, both leather and nato to see how those longer lugs then compare to the 58. Great reviews, enjoy the watch
I can certainly appreciate the excitement over the BB54. As a BB58 black owner, I don’t think I would trade it for a 54. Yes, the new bracelet is an improvement, but I love the gilted bezel with the red triangle. I also feel 39mm is a perfect size for a sports watch.
Well said. I tried on the 54 and didn't enjoy it. Definitely too diminutive on my 6.5 inch wrist. I can't see how any one with wrists bigger than 6 inches will be able to honestly say it looks better than the 58. It may feel more comfortable but you will definitely complain of the look of the size. I agree theT-Fit and knurling of the crown and the bezel is better on the 54 but I prefer the bigger crown on the 58.
I have been binge watching (no pun intended) BB54 content while I wait for my AD call and this is the best video I've seen so far. Thank you for the great review!
Great comments. I have skinny wrists and i'm ok with a "standard" 42x47mm diver, but seeing a smaller diameter and slimmer thickness is a highly welcomed surprise. Many people have asked for smaller watches lately, me included, and seeing a top brand making a 37mm diver with fine heritage is good news - and i hope this starts a trend across the watch world.
Watches look way bigger on wrist on pictures/videos than in person, that's why I have to wear 40-42mm watches. The bb58 was just a tad small for me, so i went with the root beer. The trend now is smaller watches but I don't care for trends, whatever I think looks good on my wrist is what I'm gonna get, to each their own
been waiting for somebody to these side by side, think you’re the first sir, top! I’ve been eyeing & waiting to pull the trigger for the 58, was caught off guard with the surprise launch of the 54, what a timing. defo getting the 54, the t-fit just the seal the deal for me
The seconds hand lollipop is also positioned closer to the centre I noticed, so it sweeps on the end of the 3,6 and 9 batons. That's quite a lot of changes to the BB range.
Excellent comparison content. Thank you. The new 54 is literally the closest thing to the (monumentally collectable and expensive) vintage 70’s Rolex Sub’s we are ever going to get. Thanks Tudor.
@@michaelriera6277strange though Connery never had a red triangle 🔺 on the 6538 in Goldfinger ( and I can’t see a red triangle in the Thunderball or DrNo)-so technically the 54 is more in line with the screen bond watch only it’s minus the big crown . The 5508 red triangle sub is a Myth that gets bandied about the internet but it’s completely wrong he wore that watch - he wore a 6538
I agree, its very smart how Tudor does business. People have very short memories these days, if hype is built up but no supply for six months, then customers will often end up with another model.
Lots of those differences were invisible to me until you pointed them out! Both fine watches, but I think I prefer my BB58. If they'd made the hands silver instead of gold on the 54 it might have swung it for me though - as it is the balance of gilt and steel on the 58 is better imo. I've absolutely no idea why a gilt bezel is 'juvenile', but if it is, then I'm content to be a juvenile!
The 54 is gorgeous and consistent with the trend that we're being pulled towards: the attraction for smaller watches. As you say, at first glance it looks very similar to the 58. It's only upon closer inspection that one picks up on the subtleties in the differences. A classier rendition? Possibly. Will definitely need to try it on to determine. For me, a sports watch has to be a certain size, where as with a dress watch the size it's not so important. Arguably therefore the 58 is perfect. This is my dilemma. Congratulations on your new purchase btw!
Wow, thank you so much for your video, the watch seems gorgeous. The way you film and manipulate the watch helped me a lot to have a good idea about this watch. Congratulation for your new acquisition.
Trying to decide between the two. I have a larger wrist, and my wife says she prefers the 58 on my wrist as opposed to the 54 which she says looks small. I like the idea of the t-fit clasp as well as the slim feel of the 54. It’s not an easy decision. Thanks for the great video.
Looks really great on you I must say. Really class piece 🔥 If only my wrist was as small as yours I’d be tempted. The 39-41 is better for me though. Cheers
An excellent comparison video, well done! As a very happy 58 owner, I love the 54. Looking forward to trying it on at my AD. I wish the 54 had a red triangle (my favorite detail of the 58). The original Tudor Submariner 7922 had a red triangle.
Great comparison. I agree with your thoughts as to the BB58 not being refined enough and juvenile looking because of the gilt bezel. I have never really been a fan of the gilt bezel or the square seconds hand. I love the silver/black bezel and lollipop seconds hand on the BB54. I am thinking to sell my BB58 to get the BB54 but need to see it in the flesh and try it on.
You should show the difference in effective clasp length. One if my biggest issues with the BB58 was the link connecting the the clasp unable to articulate, leaving the effective clasp length longer than the watch head lug-to-lug.
Wow! You really scored, I am shocked that a dealer had that piece already. I have my eye on the same watch with the rubber strap. That'll be my next Tudor.
Wow, Mr. Uptick! You’ve gained a ton more subscribers since the last time I checked in. I think your Aqua Terra (which I believe you bought used) suits you best!
The simplicity is wonderful , total class . Every one of the watches I have grown to love I have tended to feel a little underwhelmed to start with . If I’m dazzled to begin with I know the love affair won’t last . It’s a bit like great music instant appeal usually means the shine wears off pretty quickly ..
Considering smaller watches are becoming more in, decreasing diameter while keeping the lug to lug similar, Tudor has created a best of both worlds that works with all wrists. Going to pick one up myself
Disagree about whatever “juvenile” look you mentioned about the 58. Strange opinion. Otherwise, I would say everything else you said was pretty spot on.
I'm torn on the 54... I feel like I would love the smaller size on the 54 compared to the 58, but I do love the gold accents and snowflake seconds hand on the 58
I tried it on at the AD. Too small imo. Unless you have smaller than 6 inch wrist then I suggest the classic 58. On the 54 the bezel doesn't match the dial and without the hash marks it's not a proper dive timer. Remember this is based on an early model Tudor Sub. The improvements came incrementally and the 58 is the best tribute to the culmination of these improvements
Bravo!!!! Tudor did it again. This looks like it was the best release from Tudor and Rolex this year. It will be a while before I see in in the US, but Tudor watches are not difficult to get. This is another one watch collection type of timepiece. IMO far better looking than modern ceramic Rolex Submariners. It looks very vintage and that’s the charm of this piece. It’s like a Black Bay 58 but refined. The size is perfect for many wrist sizes and the low profile is a winner in my book. I will definitely get one this year. I hope I like it in person as I like it on video.
I think this watch will actually take sales from the BB58 black. Ironically, I think it will boost sales of the BB58 blue. Let's face it: Tudor is on 🔥.
Great review, you've really picked out all the subtle details in this watch. I'm a big fan of Tudor and love vintage inspired design in watches, however as I have an 8 inch wrist I'll have to pass on this one.
The biggest thing I noticed when I went to look at the 54 vs the 58 was the bezel on the 54 is more "polished" on the edge vs. the 58 which made turning it a bit harder vs the 58. This was the biggest thing I did not like on the 54. The other thing, is that me with smaller wrists, I really was hoping for a more compact fit on the wrist with the 54, shocking that the lug to lug was about identical in the metal although its technically 1mm shorter. I think this was a miss for Tudor, the should have not extended the case as you pointed out, and departed soon after the bezel and ended up with something like a 45mm lug to lug, that would have been just amazing for smaller wrists, which I feel was the whole point of this. So in summary, it's beautiful (I do love it) but, its not a big difference in real world vs the BB58 in terms of size. The bezel is harder to grip as a result of the polished edge as is the crown. So, it's just a matter of trading one thing for another when looking at the 58. Not an upgrade, just different.
I was holding out for an updated clasp on the 58, but with an 7in/18cm wrist I’m tempted by the 54. Not sure if will wear too small but I don’t think so from what I’ve seen
My wife is so into watches now because of my obsession 😢. She loves the new black bay 54 because she has a very small wrist, so this is perfect for her. Just waiting to arrive in Dubai. Great video. Dubai Dick 👍
I enjoyed your review. I own the BB 58 Blue and is my favorite watch in my collection by far. Never felt drawn to the BB 58 black for some reason. I’m actually on a waiting list for a Rolex, and only God knows if I’m ever gonna get the call. Love the new subtle changes like the round second hand with the counter balance, the size is beautiful in my opinion. The overall look reminds me of the maxi case of the sub in a smaller proportion. I would actually nick name it the “Mini Maxi” if it was up to me. I also love the rubber strap, it looks really classy and gives you the option to change the look fairly easy with an original strap. If I end up never getting my Rolex, I would really consider buying the BB 54, it’s a beautiful watch. I would never sell my BB 58 blue by the way.
Do you think the jubilee bracelets offered on the other Tudor models will fit the Black Bay 54? preferably one that has a T-fit clasp. That would be an instant buy for me.
I tried on both the 54 and 58 at the AD and the 58 was so much better for my 17cm wrist. The 54 didn’t feel right - my 2022 Rolex Explorer 36mm looks so much better on me. No doubt that the 54 is a nice watch though…
From my perspective is 58 much superior to 54. I love biger, Tudor's BB "signiture" crown so much better. Also minute markers between 0 and 15 on the bezel ale so practical despite BB58 looks more elegant than toolish. The red triangle makes gilt BB58 version very unique and 39 size is nothing that big that it wold have to be sized down. So I see here new 54 model beneficial mostly for women with really thin wrists who like dive watches with better clasp. Don't take me wrong...the BB54 is still very pretty watch, but not better than BB58. Thank you for such detailed comparison video anyway. Cheers!
@@travisharrisphotography And the reviewer saying that he would like to see smiley text on the dial means that he doesn't understand it too much...that he would rather have non-in house movement than this MT one...feels too much biased cause of the new acquisition. :/
Looking forward to trying this on my 19CM wrist. I prefer smaller watches but I know the 36 explorer felt too small for me. I wear a medium Santos, but on that watch I prefer the smaller size.
I own a BB58 and only gripe was its gilt bezel. Wonder how resale on the 58 would be now that the 54 appears to be a more refined with new subtle differences. Really want to make that switch. Thanks for the great comparative video.
I tried on the 54 but it looked too small. I own & prefer the 58. I also tried on the BB36 with sunburst blue dial. I would much prefer the BB36 over the 54. If you want simple, try on the discontinued 34mm Rolex Air King 114200 circa 2000. Wears the same as the new Explorer 36mm
@@MCK888Agree the 39mm of the 58 is the perfect contemporary size. The 54 looks larger on camera than in reality. Even with the fatter lugs it still looks small imo. I sat with it on my wrist at the Tudor boutique for 15 minutes. I just couldn't get over the fact. I think it's a fad. If your wrists are smaller than 16cm then the 54 may be best suited but for every one else it's more sensible to buy the classic 58 to avoid buyers remorse. I guarantee you if you buy the 54 you'll be constantly checking your wrists and the watch, not because of it's simplistic beauty but the consciousness and self doubt or justification that you are not wearing a ladies watch. Not only will you have a inferiority complex of wearing a poor man's Rolex but then you have the gender issue to contend with. Please consider thoughtfully when purchasing the 54. It may lead to psychological regret.
@@oysterman962 "I guarantee you if you buy the 54 you'll be constantly checking your wrists and the watch, not because of it's simplistic beauty but the consciousness and self doubt or justification that you are not wearing a ladies watch." Thankfully, many of us do not have a deep seated sense of insecurity about their masculinity and can happily wear a 36-37mm watch.
For me the 58 is more original, then the 54 with the snowflake hands and the red triangle. The 54 of course has a nicer crown, nicer bracelet clasp and nicer bezel ! But I prefer the BB 58 !
After watching your video, I went to local AD and luckily they have both 54 and 58 on display. Put on my 6.75 wrist the 54 is too small where as 58 just look perfect. Is just too bad 58 dont have the Tfit clasp
beautiful and almost perfect watch, except one weakness (at least for me). I would love it to have a small date window (same color). I hate to pull out my smartphone to look for the date :D
Never really bought into the Tudor thing, and I admit it's a bit of a snobbery thing. But that is a great looking watch, and I will be in the Tudor dealership tomorrow.
BB58 for 7 in wrist and above. BB54 for 7 in below. I’ve had both and prefer the BB54 with 7 in wrist. IMO, It just wears so much better and less clunky
Развлечения
![Tee Grizzley - Detroit (Feat. 42 Dugg) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aeKfTtt0x14/mqdefault.jpg)
I’ve been wearing my BB58 for 2 years now everyday, it’s my only and exit watch and it’s literally perfect! I love it!
I have a bb58, I also owned a Rolex sub 16610, I kept the sub after buying the bb58 for 1 year to see if I would miss it or which I would prefer to wear, every time I went for the black bay, twice I was in a tricky situation where it seemed as though too much interest shown in me wearing my sub, once on holiday abroad, and again in London, also my son loved the sub, but as much as I love my son a great deal more than a watch, and I didn’t want to hang a target around his neck when I left it to him. The purchase of my 16610 was something that bought as a sort of recognition (to myself) of the hard work I have done to achieve what I have as a sole trader for 50 years. I sold the sub for almost 3 times what I purchased it for 10 years ago, and bought my boy (38 yrs), you have guessed it, a bb 58 he loves it, just like I loved the sub when I first bought it, terrified of scratching it, couldn’t stop lifting my sleeve up to look at it, and he only wears his at weekends !! I never took the 16610 off my wrist, decorating, building ,gardening etc, but approaching 70yrs if I was (seriously) threatened for the bb58 I would give it up in a heart beat, move on and buy another bb58. Something I may not of done for the 16610. And something my son would would never have done !! I enjoy my watch, and prefer it more than the 16610, it is never off my wrist
I’ll keep my BB58 navy blue. Just want the T fit clasp.
The BB54 looks amazing to me. The Rolex Submariner at my local AD is backordered 60+ ppl waiting. I am in line for the BB54 now. It looks excellent.
Too small imo. Did you try it on? I tried it on. I don't see any improvement over the 58. Clasp is better and crown has been improved, but the small size is a fad. Give it 5 years, it will go out of fashion. Best to stick with the classic 58.
Considering people love their 36mm datejusts, air kings, OPs, etc, that's not true at all. @@oysterman962
I also have a BB58 black dial and no regret till now. I will wait for a BB54 blue dial 😊 Congrats for your new baby. Thanks for sharing this comparison. I was looking to see one.
I'm loving that people are loving this release!
I love it when people like Tudor. From a business model point of view, I prefer them to Rolex. Oh, and by the way, Tudor makes some great watches. If they had a thin GMT movement, they would have it all.
Some guy on a watch site was trying to guess what the new Rolex releases would be. I told to him to wait and see. When it does come out, you won’t be able to buy it anyway. You’ll have plenty of time to think about it while you wait a year or more. Then, if you have purchased enough things you didn’t want, you may get the call. Pass…
I’m not Aussie…..I’m not.
I love it, as I loved the original black bay, the 925 silver. The blue bay, the BB Pro, the Pelagos 39…. But they bring out so much the hype shifts and models can go into the background
BB54 is better than BB58. Thanks to its more measured size and the red index which has disappeared, it seems more refined. It is therefore more versatile. However, although it is beautiful, I have a little trouble with its fake vintage look because of its fake rivets. A little bad taste I think. I'm afraid I'll end up getting bored watching it in the long run. So I hesitate between the BB54 and the incredible PELAGOS 39.
Great to see them side by side. Thanks d love to see the 54 on a variety of straps, both leather and nato to see how those longer lugs then compare to the 58. Great reviews, enjoy the watch
I can certainly appreciate the excitement over the BB54. As a BB58 black owner, I don’t think I would trade it for a 54. Yes, the new bracelet is an improvement, but I love the gilted bezel with the red triangle. I also feel 39mm is a perfect size for a sports watch.
Your gilt bezel will patina to silver anyways though
Couldn’t agree more 👏🏼
I love it ❤ i never liked the red triangle always thought it looked cheap
I also own a BB58 I think it will remain the most beautiful and the most vintage
Well said. I tried on the 54 and didn't enjoy it. Definitely too diminutive on my 6.5 inch wrist. I can't see how any one with wrists bigger than 6 inches will be able to honestly say it looks better than the 58. It may feel more comfortable but you will definitely complain of the look of the size. I agree theT-Fit and knurling of the crown and the bezel is better on the 54 but I prefer the bigger crown on the 58.
I have been binge watching (no pun intended) BB54 content while I wait for my AD call and this is the best video I've seen so far. Thank you for the great review!
Thanks for the detailed comparison, didnt even notice the change on the second hand and improved clasp until this video.
Great comments. I have skinny wrists and i'm ok with a "standard" 42x47mm diver, but seeing a smaller diameter and slimmer thickness is a highly welcomed surprise. Many people have asked for smaller watches lately, me included, and seeing a top brand making a 37mm diver with fine heritage is good news - and i hope this starts a trend across the watch world.
Watches look way bigger on wrist on pictures/videos than in person, that's why I have to wear 40-42mm watches. The bb58 was just a tad small for me, so i went with the root beer. The trend now is smaller watches but I don't care for trends, whatever I think looks good on my wrist is what I'm gonna get, to each their own
It’s crazy right….. watches seem so much bigger on photos. Had a 36mm Datejust on my wrist and it looked like a child watch 😢
@@Jon-hm2wu I feel you bro, I tried my dad's datejust 36 and it just felt too small, even my wife told me it looks small for my wrist
You did it! First comparison between the two on RUclips!
I don't regret having my BB58 I find it magnificent and I would never sell for BB54
been waiting for somebody to these side by side, think you’re the first sir, top! I’ve been eyeing & waiting to pull the trigger for the 58, was caught off guard with the surprise launch of the 54, what a timing. defo getting the 54, the t-fit just the seal the deal for me
Brilliant addition to the line up, with more of what we all have been waiting for. Not to say the BB58 is still a great contender.
First review to mention the slight difference in coloration of the steel, as well as the bezel. Thank you!
The seconds hand lollipop is also positioned closer to the centre I noticed, so it sweeps on the end of the 3,6 and 9 batons. That's quite a lot of changes to the BB range.
Excellent comparison content. Thank you.
The new 54 is literally the closest thing to the (monumentally collectable and expensive) vintage 70’s Rolex Sub’s we are ever going to get. Thanks Tudor.
It’s the BB58 that is more inline with the Rolex Big Crown with the red triangle…James Bond.
@@michaelriera6277 Except, of course, that the Rolex Big Crown models were also 37mm.
More accurately, 1950s Rolex and Tudor subs. 70s submariners didn't kook anything like this.
@@michaelriera6277strange though Connery never had a red triangle 🔺 on the 6538 in Goldfinger ( and I can’t see a red triangle in the Thunderball or DrNo)-so technically the 54 is more in line with the screen bond watch only it’s minus the big crown . The 5508 red triangle sub is a Myth that gets bandied about the internet but it’s completely wrong he wore that watch - he wore a 6538
I agree, its very smart how Tudor does business. People have very short memories these days, if hype is built up but no supply for six months, then customers will often end up with another model.
MoonSwatch for example
Agree. But why don’t they please the community with a non-riveted bracelet :(
This is a fantastic comparison video. you really covered it all. Great job!
Thanks for the great video and congrats on the watch. It’s fantastic seeing someone actually own the watch so quickly for a “hands on” review.
Wow really didn't see the difference in the "roundness" until pointed out. Really liking the 54 !
Lots of those differences were invisible to me until you pointed them out!
Both fine watches, but I think I prefer my BB58. If they'd made the hands silver instead of gold on the 54 it might have swung it for me though - as it is the balance of gilt and steel on the 58 is better imo. I've absolutely no idea why a gilt bezel is 'juvenile', but if it is, then I'm content to be a juvenile!
Personally, I don't find it juvenile, but slightly overbearing. A few gilt accents are nice, but I always felt they were a bit much on the BB58.
you prefer 58 probably because you bought one lol, you would take back the 58 and exchange for the 54 if given the chance to.
@@drgeek100 Try me
The 54 is gorgeous and consistent with the trend that we're being pulled towards: the attraction for smaller watches. As you say, at first glance it looks very similar to the 58. It's only upon closer inspection that one picks up on the subtleties in the differences. A classier rendition? Possibly. Will definitely need to try it on to determine. For me, a sports watch has to be a certain size, where as with a dress watch the size it's not so important. Arguably therefore the 58 is perfect. This is my dilemma. Congratulations on your new purchase btw!
Small watches are the best
Wow, thank you so much for your video, the watch seems gorgeous.
The way you film and manipulate the watch helped me a lot to have a good idea about this watch.
Congratulation for your new acquisition.
Keeping my 58 gilt. just too beautiful. Saving for the 54. Not yet in NYC.
Trying to decide between the two. I have a larger wrist, and my wife says she prefers the 58 on my wrist as opposed to the 54 which she says looks small. I like the idea of the t-fit clasp as well as the slim feel of the 54. It’s not an easy decision. Thanks for the great video.
Love this analysis. I’ve watched it three times. Cheers 🍻
Both beautiful. I wish so much the BB58 had the improved strap
Excellent comparison with all my questions answered! Thank you for the extra details!😊
Thanks for the detailed review .. looks awesome .. congrats on your NWA 👌
Looks really great on you I must say. Really class piece 🔥 If only my wrist was as small as yours I’d be tempted. The 39-41 is better for me though. Cheers
Itty bitty titty committee
I am absolutely in love with this watch
An excellent comparison video, well done! As a very happy 58 owner, I love the 54. Looking forward to trying it on at my AD. I wish the 54 had a red triangle (my favorite detail of the 58). The original Tudor Submariner 7922 had a red triangle.
Great comparison. I agree with your thoughts as to the BB58 not being refined enough and juvenile looking because of the gilt bezel. I have never really been a fan of the gilt bezel or the square seconds hand. I love the silver/black bezel and lollipop seconds hand on the BB54. I am thinking to sell my BB58 to get the BB54 but need to see it in the flesh and try it on.
You should show the difference in effective clasp length. One if my biggest issues with the BB58 was the link connecting the the clasp unable to articulate, leaving the effective clasp length longer than the watch head lug-to-lug.
Wow! You really scored, I am shocked that a dealer had that piece already. I have my eye on the same watch with the rubber strap. That'll be my next Tudor.
Have you tried if BB54 bracelet can fit BB58?
I get my BB54 today, so excited! Also a BB58 owner... thanks for making this comparison video!
do the bb58 and bb54 have the same links?
Great review and nice to see it from the perspective of a BB58 owner!
Wow, Mr. Uptick! You’ve gained a ton more subscribers since the last time I checked in. I think your Aqua Terra (which I believe you bought used) suits you best!
The simplicity is wonderful , total class . Every one of the watches I have grown to love I have tended to feel a little underwhelmed to start with . If I’m dazzled to begin with I know the love affair won’t last . It’s a bit like great music instant appeal usually means the shine wears off pretty quickly ..
That looks amazing, very hard to resist.
The review everybody needed. Nice job.
Congrats Uptick! You're right, It does wear perfectly.
They’ve perfected the vintage sports diver
This was a great comparison review thank you. I have the 58 and will be swapping out for a 54 asap. Wear in good health Monsieur!
the 58 is more beautiful!
As owner of BB58, i bought this 54 and the charm directly operate, i sold my 58 and no regret, this 54 is a stunning piece !
Considering smaller watches are becoming more in, decreasing diameter while keeping the lug to lug similar, Tudor has created a best of both worlds that works with all wrists. Going to pick one up myself
Thank you for a great comparison….. I need to try the 54…. 🏃🏻 🏃🏻 🏃🏻
Great review. I like the 54 more than I thought I would.
i really hope they end up upgrading the 58 to have the same bracelet + clasp and lessen the case height
I prefer the coin edge bezel and the large crown of the '58. That's two of the very things that gave it its Tudor identity!?
I agree and thank you for stating so elegantly.
thank you for the valuable comparison
Excellent comparison, thanks.
I might need one, too!
Disagree about whatever “juvenile” look you mentioned about the 58. Strange opinion. Otherwise, I would say everything else you said was pretty spot on.
I'm torn on the 54... I feel like I would love the smaller size on the 54 compared to the 58, but I do love the gold accents and snowflake seconds hand on the 58
I tried it on at the AD. Too small imo. Unless you have smaller than 6 inch wrist then I suggest the classic 58. On the 54 the bezel doesn't match the dial and without the hash marks it's not a proper dive timer. Remember this is based on an early model Tudor Sub. The improvements came incrementally and the 58 is the best tribute to the culmination of these improvements
Bravo!!!! Tudor did it again. This looks like it was the best release from Tudor and Rolex this year. It will be a while before I see in in the US, but Tudor watches are not difficult to get. This is another one watch collection type of timepiece. IMO far better looking than modern ceramic Rolex Submariners. It looks very vintage and that’s the charm of this piece. It’s like a Black Bay 58 but refined. The size is perfect for many wrist sizes and the low profile is a winner in my book. I will definitely get one this year. I hope I like it in person as I like it on video.
That's a great comparison. Thank you
Very surprised you didn’t mention arguably the largest difference of all, the dial texture!
Finally, Tudor made a masterpiece
What a great review and comparison!
I think this watch will actually take sales from the BB58 black. Ironically, I think it will boost sales of the BB58 blue. Let's face it: Tudor is on 🔥.
yeah, I have a blue 58.. and would never sell for this 54, based on color alone.
I own two BB58 and I see absolutely no sense in the 54
Until Tudor starts putting simple date function on their flagstone pieces like this 54 (and 58) I can’t take them seriously
Great review, you've really picked out all the subtle details in this watch. I'm a big fan of Tudor and love vintage inspired design in watches, however as I have an 8 inch wrist I'll have to pass on this one.
The biggest thing I noticed when I went to look at the 54 vs the 58 was the bezel on the 54 is more "polished" on the edge vs. the 58 which made turning it a bit harder vs the 58. This was the biggest thing I did not like on the 54. The other thing, is that me with smaller wrists, I really was hoping for a more compact fit on the wrist with the 54, shocking that the lug to lug was about identical in the metal although its technically 1mm shorter. I think this was a miss for Tudor, the should have not extended the case as you pointed out, and departed soon after the bezel and ended up with something like a 45mm lug to lug, that would have been just amazing for smaller wrists, which I feel was the whole point of this. So in summary, it's beautiful (I do love it) but, its not a big difference in real world vs the BB58 in terms of size. The bezel is harder to grip as a result of the polished edge as is the crown. So, it's just a matter of trading one thing for another when looking at the 58. Not an upgrade, just different.
my thoughts exactly. why make the lugs longer (than the 58) when the whole idea was to make a smaller watch ( to wear not small on the wrist?)
Thank you for another great video.
54 looks so much better. Your comment concerning the 58 being try hard is accurate.
Just wondering would the rubber strap of the 54 fit in the 58?
I was holding out for an updated clasp on the 58, but with an 7in/18cm wrist I’m tempted by the 54. Not sure if will wear too small but I don’t think so from what I’ve seen
My wife is so into watches now because of my obsession 😢. She loves the new black bay 54 because she has a very small wrist, so this is perfect for her. Just waiting to arrive in Dubai. Great video. Dubai Dick 👍
Clasp on the 54 looks smaller right? Clasp on my BB58 is too large for my 6.5 wrist.
I enjoyed your review. I own the BB 58 Blue and is my favorite watch in my collection by far. Never felt drawn to the BB 58 black for some reason. I’m actually on a waiting list for a Rolex, and only God knows if I’m ever gonna get the call. Love the new subtle changes like the round second hand with the counter balance, the size is beautiful in my opinion. The overall look reminds me of the maxi case of the sub in a smaller proportion. I would actually nick name it the “Mini Maxi” if it was up to me. I also love the rubber strap, it looks really classy and gives you the option to change the look fairly easy with an original strap. If I end up never getting my Rolex, I would really consider buying the BB 54, it’s a beautiful watch. I would never sell my BB 58 blue by the way.
For my money, I'd buy a BB58 blue and a BB54.
Do you think the jubilee bracelets offered on the other Tudor models will fit the Black Bay 54? preferably one that has a T-fit clasp. That would be an instant buy for me.
I tried on both the 54 and 58 at the AD and the 58 was so much better for my 17cm wrist. The 54 didn’t feel right - my 2022 Rolex Explorer 36mm looks so much better on me. No doubt that the 54 is a nice watch though…
From my perspective is 58 much superior to 54. I love biger, Tudor's BB "signiture" crown so much better. Also minute markers between 0 and 15 on the bezel ale so practical despite BB58 looks more elegant than toolish. The red triangle makes gilt BB58 version very unique and 39 size is nothing that big that it wold have to be sized down. So I see here new 54 model beneficial mostly for women with really thin wrists who like dive watches with better clasp. Don't take me wrong...the BB54 is still very pretty watch, but not better than BB58. Thank you for such detailed comparison video anyway. Cheers!
Not to mention the 54 really is not wearing much smaller than the 58 anyway. The lug to lug in real life is about the same.
@@travisharrisphotography And the reviewer saying that he would like to see smiley text on the dial means that he doesn't understand it too much...that he would rather have non-in house movement than this MT one...feels too much biased cause of the new acquisition. :/
20 to 18 taper on the bracelet is a dealbreaker
The font on both bezels also look different. The “0” on the 54 looks more rounded while the 58 looks more squarish.
The BB54 appears to have solved all my issues with the BB58! Looks great
Excellent review
Looking forward to trying this on my 19CM wrist. I prefer smaller watches but I know the 36 explorer felt too small for me. I wear a medium Santos, but on that watch I prefer the smaller size.
I own a BB58 and only gripe was its gilt bezel. Wonder how resale on the 58 would be now that the 54 appears to be a more refined with new subtle differences. Really want to make that switch. Thanks for the great comparative video.
the golden glasses are precisely charming!
I tried on the 54 but it looked too small. I own & prefer the 58. I also tried on the BB36 with sunburst blue dial. I would much prefer the BB36 over the 54. If you want simple, try on the discontinued 34mm Rolex Air King 114200 circa 2000. Wears the same as the new Explorer 36mm
the 58 is more beautiful, and that size 39 is impeccable
@@MCK888Agree the 39mm of the 58 is the perfect contemporary size. The 54 looks larger on camera than in reality. Even with the fatter lugs it still looks small imo. I sat with it on my wrist at the Tudor boutique for 15 minutes. I just couldn't get over the fact. I think it's a fad. If your wrists are smaller than 16cm then the 54 may be best suited but for every one else it's more sensible to buy the classic 58 to avoid buyers remorse. I guarantee you if you buy the 54 you'll be constantly checking your wrists and the watch, not because of it's simplistic beauty but the consciousness and self doubt or justification that you are not wearing a ladies watch. Not only will you have a inferiority complex of wearing a poor man's Rolex but then you have the gender issue to contend with. Please consider thoughtfully when purchasing the 54. It may lead to psychological regret.
@@oysterman962 "I guarantee you if you buy the 54 you'll be constantly checking your wrists and the watch, not because of it's simplistic beauty but the consciousness and self doubt or justification that you are not wearing a ladies watch." Thankfully, many of us do not have a deep seated sense of insecurity about their masculinity and can happily wear a 36-37mm watch.
For me the 58 is more original, then the 54 with the snowflake hands and the red triangle. The 54 of course has a nicer crown, nicer bracelet clasp and nicer bezel ! But I prefer the BB 58 !
I’m surprised with the amount of items I prefer on the 54, but the larger crown size on the 58 pulls it ever so slightly ahead for me.
To me 54 seems closer to Rolex. I like BB58.
I love the 58, it has more or Tudor DNA, 54 is nice to, definitely prefer 54 than the original BB
Both are Beautiful
I got the blue One and i wanted thé black one but to similar …… now i now that this 54 would be mine , love it : all days watch
Others have commented on a slight difference in dial color, I’m trying to find one but having trouble here in Canada.
It's really minimal and to catch the sunburst effect is also not obvious
After watching your video, I went to local AD and luckily they have both 54 and 58 on display. Put on my 6.75 wrist the 54 is too small where as 58 just look perfect. Is just too bad 58 dont have the Tfit clasp
Just amazing!
beautiful and almost perfect watch, except one weakness (at least for me).
I would love it to have a small date window (same color).
I hate to pull out my smartphone to look for the date :D
Never really bought into the Tudor thing, and I admit it's a bit of a snobbery thing. But that is a great looking watch, and I will be in the Tudor dealership tomorrow.
Great comparison been waiting for this. The bracelet link design looks quite different also? Almost looks like it has tighter tolerances on the 54?
BB58 for 7 in wrist and above.
BB54 for 7 in below. I’ve had both and prefer the BB54 with 7 in wrist. IMO, It just wears so much better and less clunky
I think the dial on the 54 has a sunburst. Use some strong light on the dial, that should bring it out
Can you change the bracelet and/or clasp between the watches?
Also curious about this.
Can you try if BB54's clasp fits BB58's bracelet? If not, if BB54's bracelet fits BB58 (or if the end link is compatible)?