Airbus A220-300 vs A319neo: Which small Airbus is better?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 июл 2019
- This video is about the Airbus A220-300 vs A319, A319neo. Both of these are some of the smallest offerings in the Airbus family, but which is best as a small aircraft? Watch this epic comparison to find out! Thanks for watching and if you would like to see more such videos please hit the like and Subscribe button and of course, stay tuned for more great pure Aviation content :)
A319 is a good AIRCRAFT. Having said that A220 is an excellent bird.
My vote go to A220.
Strategically a fantastic move by Airbus to pick up the C series. A clean sheet aircraft, receiving accolades from airlines such as Air Baltic and Swiss Air. Hey, also enjoying your channel, keep it up bro.
TamaMao'i Thanks for your comment. Yeah Airbus acquiring the C Series is great for both Airbus and Bombardier indeed! Also thanks for your support :)
These airlines adore the new and improved engine software too ...
Either way Airbus wins
Rama krishnan Thanks for your comment. Yeah the A220 is the best aircraft in its class, though the A319neo is also a great aircraft. Thanks for watching and for more great content do consider subscribing and stay tuned for more great videos!
Scarebus*
@@alexkyte4093 737 max......👎
@@zabaleta66 A220 y A319neo👎
@@alexkyte4093 Boeing flying coffin 737 🤣🤣🤣
THE MUSIC MAKES IT SO DRAMATIC
If Airbus were smart ditch the A319 and make the 220 even more bad ass....Then they could focus on the 320/321's and produce more...
chris feleciano Thanks for your comment. Well Airbus is still producing the A319neo though as it is part of the A320 family Airbus could produce it when needed alongside the other family members. Also the ACJ319neo is a popular private jet and Airbus wants to compete with Boeing with its BBJ737-7 MAX. Thanks for watching and if you have not done so do consider subscribing and stay tuned for more great videos!
I think they are looking at A220-500 in couple of years to replace A320neo ONLY after the sales of A320neo slows down.
This way they could focus on A321neo replacement with A360/A370.
@@nntflow7058 the A319neo still has some interest from this airlines wanting to maintain a common fleet. It's a loss in efficiency Vs extra cost of having a different fleet type
@@AnishAbraham Well not really, A319neo and A320neo have a really small difference in terms of fuel consumptions. A320neo because of its larger size could carry more passengers which resulted in better fuel burns per passengers per mile.
And because A320neo isn't that much big than A319neo. Many airlines actually ended up upgrading their routes to A320neo instead. The low sales number of A319neo isn't helping either.
We all have to remember they do 20 behind all that Airbus planes and branding is the true and Superior Bombardier cs300
You probably should've added just 1 more line in your descriptions playing during the vid. "Airbus chose to purchase the majority share of Bombardier because then the 300% tariffs the U.S. gov.t levied on the C-Series wouldn't apply since Airbus has a plant in Mobile, Alabama, where they could then produce the C-Series, claiming that the U.S. gov.t can't rightly levy tariffs on a product that's built in the U.S." (even as a U.S. citizen, I must say that was absolutely brilliant on Airbus' part). I know the politics of the whole deal isn't what this vid was about, but if you're going to reference the battle between Boeing & Airbus, which you did, I think it's worth mentioning. Just a thought. Enjoyed the vid all the same.
Nathan Huffman Boeing is now paying for its bad decisions on the Max and was outsmarted by Airbus, who knew a great aircraft when they saw one.
@@gerardacronin3095 Ehh, I won't go so far as to say Boeing was "out-smarted by Airbus," but they were definitely PRESSURED by Airbus to get the MAX into service to compete w/the NEO...which is probably why there wasn't as near enough time devoted to training MAX pilots on a completely new system, i.e. the MCAS, as there should've been.
Nathan Huffman When I say Boeing was outsmarted by Airbus, I mean that Airbus and Bombardier found a way to collaborate to get around the egregious duties that had been imposed on Bombardier by the US government at the behest of Boeing. In return, Boeing chose to respond by rushing the Max to market and skimping on safety. It was all about money.
@@gerardacronin3095 by "egregious duties" I assume you mean the 300% tariffs emposed by the U.S. gov.t. If that's the case than yes, absolutely Boeing was out-smarted by Airbus. (Although w/Boeing purchasing a majority share of Embraer, only time will tell who comes out on top). & your final comment, I'm assuming you're agreeing w/what I said that yes, the MAX absolutely was rushed into service at the expense of safety in order to compete w/Airbus & the NEO. In all fairness though, while one could say that Airbus came out on top in this deal, when you factor in the reach of both companies, (Military, space program, etc...), Airbus is well behind Boeing. That's the only reason why Boeing has been able to absorb the cost of the MAX debacle without going bankrupt.
Nathan Huffman I agree.
The best aircraft is the one that customers order.
On looks alone, the A220! Beautiful modern aircraft.
Flew the a220 last week on Air Canada with the 19in seats it is one nice aircraft and quiet
For I Love Airbus with there New A319,A320 & A321Neo Family there Awesome so as The A220 Family too but the better smaller aircraft to me is the A220 plus is doing really well in the Regional Sector I to fly on them both soon hopefully Next Year or the year after Awesome Video Man keep it up!!!!
Amazing Airbus. Surprise me more. Always profer to fly with Airlines has Airbus 320 or Aribus 321 neo are wonderful
Thanks for tuning in to the channel do continue to do so from now on as I have decided to do DAILY Uploads! Now let me know which you think is the better aircraft here in the comments box below!
The A220 is probably the better standalone choice just due to efficiency, but the type rating being shared from the A319, A320, and A321 is important for airlines too and could be worth buying for the savings on crew training alone
Im confused which one to choose lol.
Both are elegant
I also like the look of the 220 more, looks like a mini A350
Yes I agree its like the single aisle version of a wide body🤣
Great video, explained very well the key differences and I agree the a220 is the better aircraft.
Thanks for sharing your opinion in the comments😄
A320 series aircraft's front nose is cuter than many other aircrafts, anyone agree?
Its a round cute 😍. Agreed 👍
If you intend to buy a dozen to fill in a gap but no more, then obviously 319 is a simple choice. But if you are planning long term, getting a plane that is designed for the segment is better.
I hope Air Asia will dump their love for A320s for these new A220s. Not many A319s flying even now. Plus post Covid19, who's flying anyway aside from serious business travelers...
Now it is Airbus, but in hearts of Canadians and true Bombardier fans it will always be Bombardier CS100 or CS300. No doubts, that both parties will gain benefit from this deal, but emotionally it is bit sad. Also the CS 100 and 300 sounds better than A220.
We need competition in this market, we need something like Bombardier. This plane proves the bombardier's choices were right.
Ok airbus re-brand and sell, but i Hope the deal let Bombardier possibility to share profits and invest in new planes in it's own brand later.
Being european... still a good move from our champion ;)
@@philv3941 > Bombardier has exited the commercial aircraft market and WILL NOT go back in. They lost their *ss on the CSeries and have sold off the CRJ and Dash 8 lines. They are only in the business aircraft market now.
@@rcairflr sad end. Thanks for the details
Mark, this is the reason why Canadians are enjoying the effects of Karma on Boeing. Dirty management and a dirty company as it abuses its unionized workers. Perhaps only Airbus will survive.
@@maryrafuse2297 > Boeing will continue to be a juggernaut. More than likely I know a lot more about Bombardier and the CSeries than you do (since this is a public forum, I won't tell you why I know more about Bombardier). Bombardier did not sell out the CSeries because of Boeing, they sold out because they were about to go bankrupt and needed a life line. The Canadian taxpayer was tapped out and had no more stomach to bail out Bombardier. The Boeing situation was just the last nail in the coffin.
I have to go with the A 220 - 300. I am so proud of Canadian aviation. Once again we have designed and built a world class airliner, just like the successful Q 400 turboprop. Look at the number of orders for the A 220 -300 in comparison with the A 319 - NEO. We got a winner ! I can't wait to see what the pilots think of flying the A 220's after a year or so.
Yes the A220 is very good. Luckily Airbus stepped in otherwise bombardier wouldn't get as much attention. Thx for sharing your opinion😄
I thought the 319NEO also used cfm Leaps. Also has any airline ordered 319NEOs?
A319 has better cabin Widh but Window is wider in A220. A319 range is quite better than A220. But service ceiling is higher in A220.
May I ask what editing app you use?
Pilot Sam 004 Yep, iMovie. May I also ask which do you use? Just curious lol
@@oneskyflyer nice thx👍well I don't have a PC or a Ipad that supports that app. I use Vlog Star. ( I have android not ios)
What is the price difference aka the most important factor?
Ambos son bonitos, pero me quedo con el A319neo. Toda la vida. Me encantan estos aviones. El A220 también es una excelente nave. Siempre lo mejor para el A220.
Which is better? It should not be, which is best?
Both of it better than other aircraft
I am super biased and love the A319NEO, but I also can't say that it is better than the A220
soo what i got is Boeing was lil afraid when Airbus came in eh?
My opinion: A220 is good for regional and low request medium flights.
A319neo is better for short and medium flights with high request
The truth is that the A319NEO is defunct in all but name: orders are counted with the fingers of the hands, and none have been delivered to date after 5 years of launch date. Aside from an odd government/corporate or private jet it is doubtful that any ever will. Boeing's 737-7 fares no better: Other than Midwest that wants just a few craft to serve Chicago's Midway Airport orders are scant. The reason is simple: both aforesaid models are old technology with heavier airframes. Their COC (cash operating costs), most noticeably fuel consumption, are 5-10% higher than the A220-300. Furthermore A220 will now be available from 2H2020 with a heavier extra 2.5 ton MTOW which will enable it Atlantic crossings from East Coast airports to Western European destinations, further expanding the market fragmentation of that route. The 300 version should offer 3,200NM and the 100 some 3,100NM, thus better competing with good costs against A321LR and MAX8. These figures include head winds, 5% fuel reserve, 200NM diversion and 30' loitering. Sales which so far have been reasonable, if not a barn burner, should get an extra boost with this change.
Luis de stefano Thanks for your comment. Yep I could not have said it better myself. Thanks for elaborating a little more on the details. The A220-300 is certainly a great aircraft. However the -100 is also a slow seller. Thanks for watching and if you have not done so and would like to see more awesome airplane comparisons do consider subscribing to the channel!
@@oneskyflyer I believe I had already subscribed a week ago or so.
Luis de stefano Oops... Thanks for your support!
Boeing: we are going to shut u down
Airbus: not anytime soon
Boeing needs to worry about itself before it even thinks about Airbus. ;)
Bloody well enjoyed that video, thanks. 👌🏻 sub from me
Rocky Dans Thanks for your support! Do stay tuned for more great weekly videos coming soon!
A220-300 is better.It's 10 million $ cheaper and .2 liter/km more fuel efficient compare to A319neo.
10 million $ is a huge price difference.
elios greek Thanks for your comment. Yep the A220-300 was purpose built to serve this small jet market and is the best small jet in its class. However Airbus will probably be willing to discount the A319neo as well to boost its popularity should any airline be interested. Thanks for watching and if you like this video and have not done so do consider subscribing and stay tuned for more great videos!
@Aqua man
Well it's depend upon airlines.Budget airlines with 220 series, ATR 42/72 ,320 series and 737 series are more profitable than luxury airliners.take the example of etihad and emirates ,they have mostly 777, 787 and A380.( eithad is in loss of 1.5 billion $ and emirates profit is only 232 million $)
@Aqua man Thanks for your comment. Well while efficiency and operational costs are above all else most important, purchase cost could play a role as airplane manufacturers would want to attract airlines through big discounts and to offer a better deal than their competitor. Thanks for watching and do stay tuned for more great videos!
elios greek the A319 is not just a small 320. It’s aerodynamic makes it easier to operate at high altitude airports. I have never flown the A220 but the handling of A319 will always makes make it valuable to those companies operating at high altitudes.
@@brucewz
I guarantee you ,COVID 19 crisis will change entire aviation industry scenario.
A220 is the perfect plane ,that airliners want to buy.
It's cheaper , fuel efficient ,and decent amount of passenger carrying capacity.
When I flew the a220 there were seatback screens not overhead. (I flew on Delta.)
It's their option. It's like the seat layout they can choose how they want the screens :)
Airbus should build a ACJ version of the A220.
Hmmm could be a good idea. But making a ACJ version can be very expensive tho good idea😉
i was commenting the same in another video, ACJ 220 could be awesome.
I got a question for you, how much did Airbus spend money to "like you say" acquire the C-Series?
A-220-300
i hear that the 220 is being stretch and widen to form the a360 - 6000 nm 150 passengers
Robison J. Santana Hmm... that sounds like an interesting airplane idea and will allow airlines to open up a tonne of new markets. It is worth noting that when flying long routes, due to the amount of fuel needed, a certain minimum passenger capacity is needed no matter how efficient the airplane is. As of now, Airbus has increased the Maximum Takeoff Weight of A220 to add around 300nmi more range which is still impressive. Thanks for watching and stay tuned for more great videos!
I have not flown on the A319 neo, but have flown on the A320 neo (Lufthansa), and would imagine that the differences are the same as between the A319ceo and A320ceo (Lufthansa & Swiss). I have also flown on the CS100/300 (Swiss).
Do not get me wrong, the (now) A220 is a great aircraft and I do enjoy flying on it, but I actually prefer the A319 - somehow it just feels more solid and better built. I have travelled on almost brand new A220s and ones a couple of years old - they were definitely showing far more signs of wear and tear than I have ever seen in the much older A319/320s.
The larger windows on the A220 are great until you get above the clouds, when depending on the location of the Sun, you can find it VERY unpleasant if it is streaming through a window over which you have no blind control!
I have read many comments regarding the virtues of each, but I sometimes wonder just how many of those commenting have actually flown on all of the aircraft they are commenting on regularly, if at all! And, if they have managed to travel on them, were they comparing from the same airline, as I know all to well that the customer experience is often more significantly different between airlines than it is between aircraft types.
An A220LR could easily replace the A319. Given that the mileage difference between the two is just over 300nm.
By then, an A220LR would have just enough mileage to be even more slotted under the A320 family without actually competing with the A320.
Thanks for your comment. Well yeah the A220LR concept sounds cool, hope to see Airbus invest in the A220 family in the future! Thanks for watching!
The A319neo like all A320 series can carry 1 ACT tank which adds about 400NM range. The Corporate Jet version I think can squeeze in 6. There is another thing the A319neo can do that the A220-200/300 and that is carry LD3-45 ULD (containers) which many A319ceo operators use for both luggage or freight. I think Spirit airlines just ordered some A319neo. I suspect that many airlines used the A319ceo because they had runway length issues, hot or high airport issues, wanted a little extra range or a quick climb to cruise. The A320neo due to the new engines now has the performance of the A319ceo.
Cs300LR*
@@RaY_77W *A220-300LR*
@@RaY_77W not anymore
A220
mmm... difficult decision...maybe i buy a220-100 ...gonna get my check book ready...
I love A319
The most obvious thing: The cserie is obviously more aerodynamic and consequently is more elegant. In short, it is a more beautiful plane, especially in its front part ... Comparatively, Airbus and Boeing planes are more unsightly, since their front does not obey the full logic of the least resistance to the flow of air ... Bombardier has given aerodynamics priority from the start of its design, and therefore also the lowest fuel cost for use; and gave themselves the `` dream '' of beauty ... Exactly the spirit behind all the designs of this company ... And this is even more evident with the aircraft of the Global model series. ..!
Yours.
La chose la plus évidente : Le cserie est évidemment plus aérodynamique et conséquemment est plus élégant. Bref, c'est un plus bel avion , surtout dans sa partie avant... Comparativement, les avions Airbus et Boeing sont plus disgracieux, puisque que leur avant n'obéit pas à la pleine logique de la moindre résistance au flux de l'air... Bombardier s'est donné dès le départ de la conception la priorité de l'aérodynamisme, donc aussi du plus bas coût fuel à l'usage; et s'est donné le ''rêve'' de la beauté... Exactement l'esprit à la base de toutes les conceptions de cette compagnie... Et cela est encore plus évident avec les avions de la série des modèles Global...!
Bien à vous.
Airbus, simply the best plane !!!!
A220 with upgraded engine software ? No fucking way !
OK, I don't understand something here , you said a319neo can fly further, maintenance costs are lower, but a 220 is cheaper to operate ? Something isn't right here.
vassil vassilev Thanks for your comment. Well the A319neo flies further but airlines may not require the extra range for such short flights. The A319neo is a shrink if the larger A320neo hence it is a heavier airplane than the A220-300 which is the longer variant of the A220, an aircraft which was designed from the ground up to fit into this market. Hence it has lower trip costs compared to A319neo thanks to its lighter airframe and lower takeoff weight allowing for increased fuel efficiency. Hope this answers your enquiry. Thanks for watching and if you have not done so do consider subscribing for more great videos!
@@oneskyflyer ah OK now I see what you mean, thanks :)
You copied Simply Aviation's intro song
The 220 definitely seems like a 737 and 320 killer. Will Boeing and Airbuses new clean sheets really just replace the 321? If so, Boeing will need ANOTHER clean sheet small plane..or buy Embraer..or abandon the small plane market?
A220 was the best and comfortable narrow body aircraft which i experienced.
Clearly not to be read??? White fonts make reading the comments VERY difficult. Nice graphics I guess.... but not practical.
Indigo airlines has more than 35
No a320
Airbus 319is better dont need to train 320 321 pilots likes it's there first time and familiar cockpit layout, a220 is not true airbus its adopted
Soy de Perú
Me gusta el A 320 clásico
Tiene un despegue más suave
Que los modernos neo 320
Los neo despegan muy veloces
Y muy violentos
Prefiero el 320 clásico
Es espectacular
Viajó 6 veces
Al mes en vuelos domésticos
En Perú
Y me siento muy bien
Es un 320
Lo máximo
Hello 👋 Oneskyflyer I’m Minjilang Airlines Star Alliance Group CEO Travie Timothy Buduwiju Yarmirr News: 📰 Minjilang Airlines Fleet Older 100 Aircraft Airbus A220-300, Older 100 Aircraft Airbus A319neo To Australia Airports Start 2024 ✈️🛫🛬🛩️
A32X always
On paper, the 220 is a better aircraft. But operationally, the 220 is suffering big time. Especially the 100's out of Canada. Maybe the Mobile aircraft will be better, but time will tell.
Completely false statement Dave P. You have no stats to back your stupid claims. Obviously you are from Boeing.
It has reliability recotd of 99.8% ,,, so fuck off you Boeing fanboy.
I just flew on a 220. I'll take a 40 year old 737 any day and twice on Sunday.
A319 best
Boeing is better in every single way. 737 Max 8 has more range and the most fuel-efficient aircraft.
Aside from the max 8 being an antique, having a track record of crashing into the ground, its fine. A319 has better range than the angelic max 8. So not sure what your talking about. But the A319 hasn't killed anyone. That's a plus. A220 is modern, way more modern than the a3XX airframes for that matter. A220 is the now.
@@rockerobertson4002 The max 8 has 3,550 miles. Boeing is the best company. A220 is good too. I like being better
I meant boeing
@@theflashcubing1566 in that case, the A350-900 goes 10 further than the max 8. Since your making those ridiculous comparisons.
@@rockerobertson4002 Is the 77X or A350 better?