Airbus A220 vs Embraer E195-E2: E2 vs A220, which is BETTER?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 июл 2024
- This video is about the Airbus A220 vs Embraer E2. A220 vs E195-E2, both Airbus A220 and Embraer E195-E2 are the largest most capable regional jets. The A220-100 is the loer end of Airbus A220, while E195-E2 is Embraer’s most optimized Embraer E2 version yet. Which is better? Tune in to this A220 vs E195-E2 video to find out!
Кино
I really like the E2 for its 2x2 layout.
A non-short flight sitting in the middle seat is just a nightmare to me. It doesn’t matter how many centimetres wider that seat is.
I hate having to negotiate leaving my seat AND looking out the window, while fighting for room on BOTH armrests.
COME ON ppl 🙄
I’ve never flown on the A220, but I tend to feel much less cramped if I’m not... trapped between two ppl 🤷♂️
Roger Kind Yeah the 2-2 old E2 is great for single travellers or couples though less great for families :) Thanks for tuning in!
Yes 2x2 layout is better. Like it
This is why I am very determined to work hard so I can have enough money to always travel First Class.
For the regional service, E2.
it has the right autonomy, each version has its own wing, neither small nor large for better efficiency, lower noise level.
ACJ 220 if I were to choose only for longer, low-demand routes, where greater autonomy would be decisive.
The reports of the companies that use the E2 show that it exceeds the efficiency gain promised by Embraer in some points.
E195 E2 is my decision!
World Aviation It is a great aircraft indeed! Thanks for tuning in!
@@oneskyflyer Air Canada should order E190-E2s since they ordered A220s
As a passenger, I much prefer the ERJ aircraft with 2-2 configuration. Lots of room, no middle seat at all. A220 is configured 2-3, just like an old DC9, ugh!
I think I agree, unfortunately, the more passengers the more money
you don't have to sit in the 3 side, what about family of three?
@@richardbanks6025 He is taking about his circumstances. If you are 3 of course you select what is better. But many airlines are the ones who select the chair 💺. In that case, I will go for the Embraer. The same comfort, more privacy
@@sergiolaurencio7534 All airlines allow you to pick your seat for a fee
The a220 was meant to do regional and some out of country over the ocean work. The E2 is meant for what they said, regional services
In regards to orders, the A220 family has more orders, since airlines chose the bigger variant. It really comes down to flexibility (long or short haul) and comfort. In this area the A220-100 wins hands down. However, I agree, if the airline's goal is a shot haul plane then the E195-E2 has a better cost per person on fuel burn.
But, it is especially on short haul routes where the A220's speed advantage can add extra flights per day. Speed and economy have always been trade offs when looking at revenues. Do you want to replace inefficient engines with efficient engines that have the same performance? Sure. But do you want slower engines for the sake of marginally better fuel economy? Well this is where the extra flight a day becomes a huge factor. If economy was king then we'd all be flying on prop planes. I think the market analyzers at Canadair/Bombardier saw something when they recommended specs for the PW1500G. Embardier also essentially created the specs for the PW1700G. By choosing a less expensive, lower thrust engine for their aircraft they have created an aircraft with a lower purchase price and lower fuel burn but also an aircraft that can not complete an extra route per day and cannot fly into higher altitude cities.
The Company I work for just ordered 100 E195-E2. Can’t wait to fly
The A220 is better as a hybrid between a regional jet and a standard short to medium haul plane (i.e. 737, A320). Meanwhile the E2 is better as a regional jet.
What you E2 supporters don't understand is that when Canadair/Bombardier gave their specs for a new "fuel efficient" geared engine to PW they choose a thrust ratio that would optimism speed and altitude performance. This increased the number of regional fights an aircraft could make a day, while also allowing higher altitude airports. They weren't idiots. They knew they already had a more fuel efficient engine so they asked what was more important, being the most efficient or being efficient and flexible. Embraer came along second and were already where known as the cheaper sticker price plane manufacturer and so chose the specs to keep that market differentiation. They have a plane with an engine that is cheaper to purchase (giving the entire aircraft a lower sticker price), more economical to fly, and slightly quieter than the other new quieter fuel efficient engine on the market. But it can't fly as fast, and can't fly out of some high-altitude airports. So it will make fewer short haul flights for you in a day into fewer airports and on long haul flights your customers will notice significantly longer flight times. If I was a new airline specializing in mid-haul flights to cheep holiday destinations I'd choose the E2. But if you're a big airline with lots of regional flights to fill a day the performance of the CSeries/A220 makes you much more money over the life of the aircraft. The reason the A220 only has a 1000 orders so far is because the other airlines who hesitated can't afford to wait for new aircraft.
Embraer 195E2 The Best
E 195 > A 220
A220, high acquisition cost and high operating cost with the same revenue is the right formula for low efficiency. And even higher depreciation cost. All unfavorable.
The E2 consume less fuel and that better for airline. I don't understand why the E2 don't gat so much attention
@@sergiolaurencio7534 Power Airbus
@@giggio21br power airbus?
E-jet beats CRJ, but I'd pick A220 family any day of the week over E175 or E195. E-jet is for low-quality Greyhound like quick rides, whereas A220 family is much more premium and sophisticated ride.
@@sergiolaurencio7534 Embraer E2 has a lower noise level and better fuel consumption. But unfortunately, Airbus has a huge lobby in the market. That's the point!!!
E2 is a regional jet
A220 is a medium range jet
E2 more fuel efficient-so it will do better on flights less than 2 hours
Btw that A220’s washroom window is just... marvellous
I’ve always wondered “WHY NOT?!”
I don't like the 3-seat row of the A220. The planes are similar but the E2 is quieter and longer and this allows it to have rows with 2 seats on both sides with practically the same number of passengers.
I don't care much either for the 3 to 2 seat row configuration, but how do you know the E2 is quieter than A220 ?
@@rscott2247 is actually have the same engine as the 220. But some passengers have found it more quiet then the 220.
@@rscott2247 It's a very interesting new talking point these paid commenters are hitting on "quieter". The PW1700g Geared Turbo-fan engine the E2 uses has a thrust ratio between 15,000-17,000 lbf 67-76 kN , the A220's PW1500g Geared Turbo-fan has a thrust ratio between 19,000-23,300 lbf 85-104 kN. The E2 has a quieter lower performing engine than the A220. But they are significantly slower. So on short haul routes they add about 15 min to a flight or an entire extra flight a day is lost compared to the A220. And because they are both geared (so they can change their thrust without steping on the "gas peddle") they are both quieter than the older market dominating RollsRoyce engines. Oh and the C-Series/A220 has the active noise canceling system in the fusalage that Bombardier developed for the DASH8/QSeries Turboprops. So until I see a blogger recording a decibel meters on comparative flights I have seen no stats suggesting the A220 isn't actually the quieter passenger flight experience.
@@sergiolaurencio7534 No. It is not the same engine. It is the same engine manufacturer, Pratt&Witney . And the same new fuel efficient and quieter "geared" turbo-fan technology. But Bombardier chose the faster higher thrust PW1500g for the CSeries/A220. So the A220 can fly more flights a day on short routes or fly longer routes faster. The E2's PW1700g is also a new quieter and more fuel efficient engine but they chose a thrust ratio to optimism fuel efficiency and sticker price. Outside of the aircraft the PW1700g is the quieter engine. Of course there are a lot of other factors effecting the noise levels inside the aircraft.
EMBRAER 195-E2, because I'm brazilian 🇧🇷
I really believe the Embraer E2 Jets are more better. It flies more distances, burns fuel more slowly, and it is more quieter.
According to the stats on Wikipedia the E2's don't have the range of the A220's. If E2 is such a better jetliner, why aren't more airlines ordering it ? It may be cheaper than A220 but what about quality, serviceability, fuel burn ? Air Canada is retiring many of its Embraer jets but not replacing them E2's. Go figure !
@@rscott2247 Albert is mistaken or very misinformed. Even the current version of the A220 has longer range than the E2. Plus, E-jet feels cheap and defines a low-quality quick-hop flight. A220 family offers a superior level of comfort that even beats B737 and A330 in some ways.
basically, if and when Embraer fits a bigger fuel tank, E195 E2 shall be the indisputable option considering all the rest, especially operational costs and buying costs.
Both are very good planes and some can be better in different uses even though they are both regional jets
i really like my brazil embraer but highlights are all top aircraft. samuel brazil
Great video (as always!!)
VIAJAR ou PILOTAR o E2 é muito melhor do que o A220.... O resto das comparações são pela força do poderio econômico da AIRBUS
E195 E2
More efficient, newer, cheaper.
E2 is an obvious choice
I love the E2, not just because im brazilian.
Airbus smallest jet or Embraer's largest jet? Let me know in the comments below! Thanks for tuning in and till we meet next week, Clear Skies Ahead!
Welcome. I'm new to your channel and I must say I'm impressed.
Keep up the good work.
Let me subscribe
Epic comparison.
Great video
Thanks for your support!
Both of them are the best ones and more modern.
Good comparison video but unable to enjoy due to louder irritating music in between as other videos in this channel.
I found challenging following this presentation because of the attacks from the super loud music that muffles the voice.
Embraer E2 has a lower noise level and better fuel consumption. Moreover, it has a very beautiful wing shape and design. But unfortunately, Airbus has a huge lobby in the market. That's the point!!!
Airlines fly more flights a day (yes especially on short haul routs) without any airport altitude restrictions with the CSeries/A220. All this with easier maintenance schedules. Larger airlines will choose flexibility and revenue over sticker price and fuel burn any day. Why have there only been 1000 A220 ordered..because the airlines who hesitated don't want to wait in line. Oh and don't kid yourself the A220 is a very quiet plane as well.
E2 is more profitable and comfortable. However, the AirBus lob is stronger, even with an inferior product and the only advantage being autonomy.
No the E2 is not more profitable. It is the more fuel efficient of the two very efficient aircraft and it has a lower sticker price. But it is so much slower than the C-Series/A220 that with short haul flights you can actually get an extra flight a day in with the A220. The A220 also seats more passengers and also has a better maintenance schedule. So over the life of the aircraft the A220 will make you more money.
As the E2-195 has lighter OEW 35t compare to 37t A220-300, this should be more fuel efficient
In other side the A220-300 has widest seats among any economy class, wider windows & further range 6200km
Interesting point to note. The A220 300 would have similar fuel burn per trip as the smaller - 100. So with the larger capacity, the A220-300 will reverse the 5% advantage that the E2 has on per seat basis making it more efficient than the E195-E2.
@@chingweixion621 my point of view is per trip not per seat.
Wait, "similar"....show us the data...
@@stradivarioushardhiantz5179 I just realised the A220-100 isn't a simple shrink of the - 300. It has lower MTOW and lower take-off thrust. The similar per trip cost would not apply then.
Great video but wasnt this comparison already done, a year ago?
This was the "complicated story" in his own words. XD
I wish people would understand A220 was never a regional jet Bombardier already had the CRJ, A220 was built as a medium to longer haul jet, up to 7hrs, can cross the Atlantic , Montreal to Eastern Europe, The Embraer was strictly a short haul regional jet, nothing more
E195-E2 for me
What variants are you comparing. You should have been more specific based on seating capacity.
nice video! the music is a bit too loud though, compared to the recording of your voice... great work!
Bruno Vilela Thanks for your feedback! Will work on it in my future videos :)
@@oneskyflyer Also your accent too strong to understand easily
@@romer1816 no it isn’t
Now the Virgin Galactic's Concorde video please 🙏🙏🙏
Hmm, perhaps not the next but shortlisted
@@oneskyflyer, ok
For regional travel the e195 E2 is better than the a220-109
Yep, its cheaper without the added range that might not be needed
And it looks way more stylish
@@woodduck2178 yeahhh that's true
This is one of the reasons with make me love the ejets w2 family
In special the wings
@@lucioalmeida1942 With a name like that you are not biased?
@@romer1816 i don't think so
O Embraer é mais confiável ! Nunca ví um avião dessa empresa cair !
The 190 E2 is better efficiency than both . The EjetE2 has a New meteorologic radar fantastic
Hmm cool! It is a better regional jet if airlines do not need the range. Thanks for watching!
Interesting point to note. The A220 300 would have similar fuel burn per trip as the smaller - 100. So with the larger capacity, the A220-300 will reverse the 5% advantage that the E2 has on per seat basis making it more efficient than the E195-E2.
@@chingweixion621 but the E2 consume less fuel and that better than the 220 also that if someone is suffering from the ears the E2 is a better option. I have flow on the 220 and I think the E2 is better for me. One just go were they like.
Meanwhile the 737 is suffering in the nighmares world. Boeing need help
E2 the best.
The A220 is more expensive, but it's better
you should be comparing the Embraer to the Bombardier CRJ900 not the CS100/300
A220 for life
E195 e2 the best ultra 😎
Couldn't finish watching because of the annoying music interspersed with large volume shifts between the music parts and the spoken parts.
The winner is preferred by tje airliners
didnt boieng kind of bought embraer? so its still boeing vs airbus anyway...
No, that deal fell through.
I thought you were speaking English there for a bit
LOL Excruciating
A220 is just sexy as hell
Two amazing aircraft. The interior of E2 is more interesting due to seats layout configuration . Airbus is a Giant, the Goliah x David....
Let me answer that for you: A220. You are welcome
A220 😍
E2😁. And the 737( don't say anything bad)
Never flown in an E195-E2 so A220 for now
but the a220-100 is more fuel efficient due to newer tech
And the E2 consume less fuel and is more quiet and comfortable for me. I'm my case the E2 is perfect for us. But I will fly on any of them. And I hope the best for the 737
Both use the same new Pratt&Whitney "geared" technology. It is the thrust ratios that are different. The trust ratio of the E2 PW1700g is much lower than the A220's PW1500g. So the E2 is more efficient and quieter than the efficient and quiet A220 . BUT, the A220 is so much faster airlines can actually get an extra flight in a day on short haul routes.
Nah bombardier cs-200/300 is next level compared to the ebmruh jet e2
It is an aircraft from the class above after all :) And costs more too :),but its a great aircraft. Thanks for tuning in!
The C Series/ A220 was never built as a regional jet, it is a medium to longer range aircraft, it can fly across the Atlantic , it can fly up to 6 1/2 hrs and has an longer range option, the Embraer is strictly a regional plane and old technology, ( new engines only)
Old technology?