This is a great gun. Just perfect imo for carry. Light, compact, hammer fired, ambi and Walther quality. Plus .380 is 9mm short so it's capable of getting the job done at close range.
I literally read the manual of every firearm I purchase, from front cover to back cover. They are tools that garner a great amount of attention to detail - for safety reasons as well as longevity of the product. Each manufacturer has their own nuances.
I like it. Definitely be checking for one at my local shop. The PD380 also has a trigger chassis system, so it has room to grow. Longer grip module and it can have a higher magazine capacity.
I kinda wanted one when I heard it was coming out then when I got to finally hold one I wasn’t really digging it I like my Ruger security 380 better. Thanks for the video.
I totally agree. The Ruger is thinner, less tall, lighter, holds 1 more round, doesn't have the dumb thumb safety that flips up to fire instead of down, and is about $100 less expensive. There is no comparison. Ruger for the win.
Both are great options but the Walther has better ergonomics and has a nice SA trigger pull. Ruger is a tad thinner, an extra round and cheaper. Pick your poison.
Great video as always GB 🤟🏾 The design and looks of this firearm is cool however it comes up short for me. Primarily because of the limited capacity, then not being optics ready. The gold standard of 380, at least in my opinion, is the äuget Security 380. The only downside being a lack of optics ready slide but awesome capacity.
Locked breech, fixed barrel, hammer fired, good ergonomics, not finicky about ammo, adjustable sight, and $300 price make this highly desirable from every standpoint that matters: reliability, safety, accuracy, comfort.
TY for bullet fit shot showing unsupported barrel = no reloads, which was the only way to make shooting 380's cheap for range time. I like how the pistol felt in hand & similar profile to Walther's 22 for training. But if you got the press, dies & bullet molds - you always like to reload slightly expensive bullets.
Thank you for the review. Only thing, I wish they would have incorporated a de cocker. If not for anything else, common manual of arms for typical DA/SA
I’d be interested to see how it matches up with the 3.5” PDP-F - a comparison in size, weight, how it conceals and how comfortable it’s to carry. I can’t imagine it being that much smaller than the 9mm F (which I carry IWB) either way - any PDP is a sexy looking beast!!
I would have considered the new PD380 but the lack of a decocker is a deal killer for me. I guess I'll just stick with Beretta and CZ (and maybe some old Rugers and S&W's). Thanks, Graham.
CZ SP01 doesn't have a decocker and also has a DA/SA trigger. The hammer has to be manually lowered, with nothing to block the firing pin like the PD380 has. 🤷🏻♂️
The safety blocks the rear of the pin allowing you to drop the hammer manually. A decocker blocks the pin also then slams the hammer forward. Seems like the same thing to me...maybe safer to drop hammer manually. You do have to slightly pull trigger to release hammer but not enough to disengage internal firing pin safety.
@@brianscott2895man I would’ve suggested this to my mom, but she’s starting out with firearms and lowering the hammer yourself is challenging for 1st timers. I don’t know who else this is marked to. Not necessarily 1st timers, but it should be intuitive for someone with low dexterity to operate (and lets say potentially lower skill). If CZ had a compact hammer or striker gun in 380 I would grab it in a heartbeat.
@@brianscott2895I think it would be less safe. More steps so another chance to mess up. You could think you’re safely decocking the firearm but actually have the safety off so it ends up going off.
If a person is very recoil sensitive this may be a good option as the recoil with this locked breach (as opposed to the PPK/PP design of straight blow back) design will be considerably less than 9mm. I can’t understand why they haven’t taken this design to a stack and a half magazine that would accommodate more rounds. Having a mag like that of the LCP Max would be an easy engineering feat and would not increase the size of the already substantial grip.
My initial thought in the first minute was "why would walther introduce this? Where does this fit in the market?" Then you pulled out the PPK. "Oooooohhh, right, that's why"
Finally someone asking the same question that I'm asking. I wrote to Walther requesting the PD9. I really like the non-decocker safety, but I would much prefer a slide release, rather than racking to return to battery. With this safety, it is like having a single-action only pistol.
Is there some trick to pulling the tabs down and pushing the slide off? Try as I might, I cannot get the tabs to pull down more than a miniscule amount and the slide simply will not come off. Anyone have a similar issue with takedown?
You know gun manufacturers have been trying to reach a broader audience and people new to firearms are scared of recoil. They believe that big guns equal painful recoil. Walther did not make this firearm for the tactical crazies out there or the Fudds. They made it for people who will probably buy one gun and one gun only or for the spouses of gun guys who hate recoil. I hope the other gun tubers don’t kill this firearm like they did the smith and Wesson csx.
The S&W CSX I bought was junk. I've heard they later fixed things, but I didn't get a recall or notification from S&W, they were just happy to have made some money.
I'm a Smith fan and I will say unequivocally state that guntubers didn't unnecessarily bash the CSX. It was/is a horrible gun upon release. Horrible. The worst of it was, it was a good idea but a very poor effort by S&W. I hope that they took it back to the drawing board and tried again, though I doubt they could regain the lost interest.
@@GBGuns I agree the launch of the pistol was bad, I was using the csx as an example that if it dosent make sense to most guntubers they will unequivocally bash the pistol. The initial launch of the p365 was , I would say worse, but because it made sense to guntubers they gave it a second chance and now their are multiple versions of the p365. At the end of the day I want as many people in the U.S armed and focusing only on the one demographic alienates others.
@mikee7241 That's why I do my best to review everything I can get my hands on. S&W didn't want to send us a CSX, and I found out why when I bought one. That gun (in early versions) did not hold up to my protocols. I've come to see that when a company sends to "infkuencers" but avoids my factual review, there's likely a reason.
@@GBGuns and I appreciate that. I know when I watch your content I am going to get an honest review of the pistol. Their are very few guntubers opinions I respect on RUclips
I had a P22 that was just a poor quality gun, made by their Umarex airsoft division , seemed like lots of pot metal and low grade mim parts. This .380 looks like it too is made at the Umarex factory.( 3 crown crest stamp) I wonder if it is modeled after their P22 , using pot metal to save cost and weight.
If you do a little looking around at Walther products, you'll find that distinct grip, grip angle, and slide pre-dating and existing alongside the P22 Umarex "Walther." Also, btw. The umarex p22 was a zinc alloy slide, which was the root of nearly all of it's problems. If you have a cracked slide P22 (common fate) I suggest you contact Walther. Even with an old one it's quite likely (no guarantee, but worth a phone call, why not?) they'll make good for you with a new slide. Walther USA customer service has been topnotch in the past. Best of luck.
Nearly twice as much money was spent by Americans in .380 than 10mm ammo. Even .357 Magnum is more popular than 10mm. www.gbgunsdepot.com/post/what-really-happened-with-guns-ammo-in-2023
@@gbgunsmedia In that case Walther needs a new P22 for plinking. Unfortunately I will never get a grip on these guns. Ironically I'm German. Here you cant carry guns and can only get them with a hunting or sports shooting licence. Both is expensive and your amount of ownable guns are limited (only 3).
@Mr.Z1989 I know, and now after a stabbing you have politicians calling for more gun control. Ich war 7 Jahren im Deutschland statzioniert. Ich liene Deutsche Kuktur, aber die Regierung nicht.
There is no excuse for a 380 this size to only hold 9+1. Also, the thumb safety flips up to fire instead of down which is just awkward and stupid. It's also too expensive for what it is. Hard pass.
@@GBGunseh, it's just a guy thing. I mean, it's kinda like how we never ask for help in the grocery store or for directions at the gas station😆 We'd prefer to just stumble around and look stupid for a while.
I was really interested in this gun until I rented one at the range. Talk about German over thinking. The best way I can describe this gun is that it’s a lot answers to questions no one is asking. The paddle mag release on this little gun is awkward. There’s no slide stop. You have to decock it like a revolver. They take down is complicated. I feel like it was not made for the American market. It just misses the mark. In a lot of ways. That’s disappointing. Meanwhile everyone is waiting for a follow up to the PPSM2 in a double stack or the PDP in a micro size
Full review with specs and pricing: www.gbgunsdepot.com/post/walther-pd380
This is a great gun. Just perfect imo for carry. Light, compact, hammer fired, ambi and Walther quality. Plus .380 is 9mm short so it's capable of getting the job done at close range.
You're absolutely correct 🙏. Walther is a fantastic firearms manufacturer. Thank you for sharing your comment 🙏
A very slim and ergonomic hammer-fired, da/sa pistol.
What's not to appreciate?
Good video
Low capacity for its size, silly flip up safety, and too expensive.
@@michaelbrohl1625 Ah yes, definitely need 15+ rounds for that hit squad that's coming to get you on the way to the grocery store LMFAO
@@mr.wiggles7535Do you suck cock for a living or is it just a hobby ? LMFAO
@@michaelbrohl1625too expensive?!
@@PillsBuryDoughBoy_ Ruger Security-380. $100 cheaper and better in every way.
I literally read the manual of every firearm I purchase, from front cover to back cover. They are tools that garner a great amount of attention to detail - for safety reasons as well as longevity of the product. Each manufacturer has their own nuances.
Where can I send your trophy?
@@Abchve1356 to the school of due diligence.
Me, too. I find them an invaluable source of information. (And the idiotic comment to your post displays how people are such bastards.)
The wave of the future 👍👍
No trigger dingus 👍
DA/SA trigger👍
Uber ergonomic PDP texture and contours👍
Love Love Love.
I JUST GOT ONE IN BLACK AND PURPLE.. I LOVE IT AND HAVENT EVEN FIRED IT YET!!! THANKS FOR YOUR REVIEW... GOD BLESS YOU 🙌 🙏 ❤️
I like it, this might be my next purchase ...
I like it. Definitely be checking for one at my local shop. The PD380 also has a trigger chassis system, so it has room to grow. Longer grip module and it can have a higher magazine capacity.
I kinda wanted one when I heard it was coming out then when I got to finally hold one I wasn’t really digging it I like my Ruger security 380 better. Thanks for the video.
I totally agree. The Ruger is thinner, less tall, lighter, holds 1 more round, doesn't have the dumb thumb safety that flips up to fire instead of down, and is about $100 less expensive. There is no comparison. Ruger for the win.
Both are great options but the Walther has better ergonomics and has a nice SA trigger pull. Ruger is a tad thinner, an extra round and cheaper. Pick your poison.
@usernamesrlamo Ruger. And it's not even close. I also totally disagree about the Walther having better ergos and trigger.
@@michaelbrohl1625i would say the walther is better quality and more reliable from my experience. Had to sell my ruger because of reliability issues.
Thank you for sharing your video on this pistol..
We appreciate your opinions and knowledge.
Have a great weekend 🙏
Outstanding review of yours. German engineering and craftsmanship is second to none copied by many 😃. 🙏
Next on my "To buy" list! Thanks for this review sir!
Thank you, for more information including the full review, ammo, etc check the pinned comment.
Great video as always GB 🤟🏾
The design and looks of this firearm is cool however it comes up short for me. Primarily because of the limited capacity, then not being optics ready.
The gold standard of 380, at least in my opinion, is the äuget Security 380. The only downside being a lack of optics ready slide but awesome capacity.
Locked breech, fixed barrel, hammer fired, good ergonomics, not finicky about ammo, adjustable sight, and $300 price make this highly desirable from every standpoint that matters: reliability, safety, accuracy, comfort.
Small gun for big hands, love it.
TY for bullet fit shot showing unsupported barrel = no reloads, which was the only way to make shooting 380's cheap for range time. I like how the pistol felt in hand & similar profile to Walther's 22 for training. But if you got the press, dies & bullet molds - you always like to reload slightly expensive bullets.
Thank you for the review. Only thing, I wish they would have incorporated a de cocker. If not for anything else, common manual of arms for typical DA/SA
Maybe Walther will INCLUDE a de-cocker later on.
@@charlesbeall2589 good idea !
Nice looking gun ,perfect for female first time gun purchase.
I’d be interested to see how it matches up with the 3.5” PDP-F - a comparison in size, weight, how it conceals and how comfortable it’s to carry. I can’t imagine it being that much smaller than the 9mm F (which I carry IWB) either way - any PDP is a sexy looking beast!!
Full specs are in the pinned comment.
Great review! Thank you
I would have considered the new PD380 but the lack of a decocker is a deal killer for me. I guess I'll just stick with Beretta and CZ (and maybe some old Rugers and S&W's). Thanks, Graham.
I’d prefer if it had an actual decocker also.
CZ SP01 doesn't have a decocker and also has a DA/SA trigger. The hammer has to be manually lowered, with nothing to block the firing pin like the PD380 has. 🤷🏻♂️
The safety blocks the rear of the pin allowing you to drop the hammer manually. A decocker blocks the pin also then slams the hammer forward. Seems like the same thing to me...maybe safer to drop hammer manually.
You do have to slightly pull trigger to release hammer but not enough to disengage internal firing pin safety.
@@brianscott2895man I would’ve suggested this to my mom, but she’s starting out with firearms and lowering the hammer yourself is challenging for 1st timers. I don’t know who else this is marked to. Not necessarily 1st timers, but it should be intuitive for someone with low dexterity to operate (and lets say potentially lower skill). If CZ had a compact hammer or striker gun in 380 I would grab it in a heartbeat.
@@brianscott2895I think it would be less safe. More steps so another chance to mess up. You could think you’re safely decocking the firearm but actually have the safety off so it ends up going off.
I got this for Christmas. Hubby had it customed painted purple for me. What's the best online store to get a holster and conceal carry bag for it??
Thanks for the video
If a person is very recoil sensitive this may be a good option as the recoil with this locked breach (as opposed to the PPK/PP design of straight blow back) design will be considerably less than 9mm.
I can’t understand why they haven’t taken this design to a stack and a half magazine that would accommodate more rounds. Having a mag like that of the LCP Max would be an easy engineering feat and would not increase the size of the already substantial grip.
THis is already 9+1 rounds, if they went any bigger they'd lose sales in the unConstitutional states.
@@GBGunsHadn't thought of that. Good point
Graham, could you do a review on the Taurus Th45 and the new Rost Martin RM1C, Thanks Dwight
That'll be up to oour patrons.
Please review the new to America Glock G25 .380
My initial thought in the first minute was "why would walther introduce this? Where does this fit in the market?" Then you pulled out the PPK. "Oooooohhh, right, that's why"
Yeah, but I don't think the PPK is disappearing any time soon.
I know nobody else likes it, but i would really like to see an updated ccp.
The ccp m2+ is out now
Why don't they put the slide release lever while they put the safety lever?
Will they make PD9, chambered in 9 mm? I like the ambi safety and release. Think that might come next?
Finally someone asking the same question that I'm asking. I wrote to Walther requesting the PD9. I really like the non-decocker safety, but I would much prefer a slide release, rather than racking to return to battery. With this safety, it is like having a single-action only pistol.
Look it here, A walther p22, in pdp format in 380...wow
i said that in my mind in a 90s local used car dealership commercial voice
Your Walther ignorance is showing.
Zip up or it'll freeze off😂
Is there some trick to pulling the tabs down and pushing the slide off? Try as I might, I cannot get the tabs to pull down more than a miniscule amount and the slide simply will not come off. Anyone have a similar issue with takedown?
Walther, produce a PD9. Soon. Keep that awesome non-decocker safety, but add a slide release.
quick question: Are there any parts from the pk380 that is interchangeable with the PD380?
I don't know, I don't have a PK380
Make this optic ready, double stack, and change the safety to fire being down and this gun would be perfect.
I don't think the design of the safety barrel would allow that.
how is the size comparison to the original P365 & XL?
full specs are in the pinned comment.
There is no saami spec for 380 +p.
Did I miss how many rounds the mag holds ?
Full specs are in the pinned comment.
Not impressed with this gun but great video 👍
You know gun manufacturers have been trying to reach a broader audience and people new to firearms are scared of recoil. They believe that big guns equal painful recoil. Walther did not make this firearm for the tactical crazies out there or the Fudds. They made it for people who will probably buy one gun and one gun only or for the spouses of gun guys who hate recoil. I hope the other gun tubers don’t kill this firearm like they did the smith and Wesson csx.
The S&W CSX I bought was junk. I've heard they later fixed things, but I didn't get a recall or notification from S&W, they were just happy to have made some money.
I'm a Smith fan and I will say unequivocally state that guntubers didn't unnecessarily bash the CSX. It was/is a horrible gun upon release. Horrible.
The worst of it was, it was a good idea but a very poor effort by S&W.
I hope that they took it back to the drawing board and tried again, though I doubt they could regain the lost interest.
@@GBGuns I agree the launch of the pistol was bad, I was using the csx as an example that if it dosent make sense to most guntubers they will unequivocally bash the pistol. The initial launch of the p365 was , I would say worse, but because it made sense to guntubers they gave it a second chance and now their are multiple versions of the p365. At the end of the day I want as many people in the U.S armed and focusing only on the one demographic alienates others.
@mikee7241 That's why I do my best to review everything I can get my hands on. S&W didn't want to send us a CSX, and I found out why when I bought one. That gun (in early versions) did not hold up to my protocols. I've come to see that when a company sends to "infkuencers" but avoids my factual review, there's likely a reason.
@@GBGuns and I appreciate that. I know when I watch your content I am going to get an honest review of the pistol. Their are very few guntubers opinions I respect on RUclips
Pity so much of video is out of focus, seems that the camera has very shallow depth of field only 5mm
Seems like a great choice for women and old people in ban states. Shame there’s no optic cut though
I had a P22 that was just a poor quality gun, made by their Umarex airsoft division , seemed like lots of pot metal and low grade mim parts. This .380 looks like it too is made at the Umarex factory.( 3 crown crest stamp) I wonder if it is modeled after their P22 , using pot metal to save cost and weight.
"The slide of the PD380 is machined steel." Guns and Ammo Magazine.
If you do a little looking around at Walther products, you'll find that distinct grip, grip angle, and slide pre-dating and existing alongside the P22 Umarex "Walther."
Also, btw. The umarex p22 was a zinc alloy slide, which was the root of nearly all of it's problems.
If you have a cracked slide P22 (common fate) I suggest you contact Walther. Even with an old one it's quite likely (no guarantee, but worth a phone call, why not?) they'll make good for you with a new slide. Walther USA customer service has been topnotch in the past.
Best of luck.
Was their last .380 steel too ?@@MrSmith-zy2bp
True, but this gun still has the Umarex stink stamp on it, it looks good, I hope its better.@@MrSmith-zy2bp
It's marked Ulm
Walther should have gone up to a PDP in 10mm instead of down to a .380.
Nearly twice as much money was spent by Americans in .380 than 10mm ammo. Even .357 Magnum is more popular than 10mm. www.gbgunsdepot.com/post/what-really-happened-with-guns-ammo-in-2023
But why? I mean, I can see people wanting the PD380 chambered in 9mm, but 10mm is... 🤪
Looks like a PK380 with a face lift.
That's effectively what it is; bringing the PK380 into the PDP generation.
@@gbgunsmedia True. But there is no reason to upgrade. U can even use the same magazines.
@@Mr.Z1989 I don't think they're asking existing owners to update, just making sure the current offering is current.
@@gbgunsmedia In that case Walther needs a new P22 for plinking. Unfortunately I will never get a grip on these guns. Ironically I'm German. Here you cant carry guns and can only get them with a hunting or sports shooting licence. Both is expensive and your amount of ownable guns are limited (only 3).
@Mr.Z1989 I know, and now after a stabbing you have politicians calling for more gun control. Ich war 7 Jahren im Deutschland statzioniert. Ich liene Deutsche Kuktur, aber die Regierung nicht.
👍🏻👍🏻🇺🇸🇺🇸🔫🔫💯💯☕️☕️
There is no excuse for a 380 this size to only hold 9+1. Also, the thumb safety flips up to fire instead of down which is just awkward and stupid. It's also too expensive for what it is. Hard pass.
Shutup
I’m new to this. That being said, how many shots do you need to stop a “situation”? This price I kinda agree but I said I’m new.
@@alexsherel3344 Depends on the situation. More is better.
@@michaelbrohl1625 I know, I’m just saying.
All of which are your options.
Who looks at the manual....
I do, for every gun, and more often than not I find the answer to a question someone inevitably asks because they don't read the manual.
@@GBGunseh, it's just a guy thing. I mean, it's kinda like how we never ask for help in the grocery store or for directions at the gas station😆
We'd prefer to just stumble around and look stupid for a while.
Great review as usual!
Like you, I always read the manual first thing.
People are griping about this pistol, but I'm in love with it.
I was really interested in this gun until I rented one at the range. Talk about German over thinking. The best way I can describe this gun is that it’s a lot answers to questions no one is asking. The paddle mag release on this little gun is awkward. There’s no slide stop. You have to decock it like a revolver. They take down is complicated. I feel like it was not made for the American market. It just misses the mark. In a lot of ways. That’s disappointing. Meanwhile everyone is waiting for a follow up to the PPSM2 in a double stack or the PDP in a micro size
It's a mistake to think that Walther is in competition with Glock.
Way too large, and bulky for the caliber..
Have you ever shot a larger-build 380? They're much more comfortable, and since they're easier to control they're also safer.
have to wonder, why not go stack and a half and give it like 12 rounds :p
Maybe so they can sell in more states