You are heads above most product reviewers, with a clear, warm and organized way of presenting comparisons. Great sense of humor also. How do you not have at least a million subscribers?
14:59 this even checks out perfectly with the maths! F2.8 is excactly 1 1/3 stops more than F4.5. So you need 130% more light to have the same exposure. You reduced your lights from 85% to 40% which is a 125% difference in light :D
I just got my Sigma 16 1.4 and I am now the Toneh master. I’m getting the 18-50 Ever since I started using manual mode for filming squirrels and amateur photography, I’m all about the bokeh. I love your content.
I love the form factor of the 18-50mm Sigma f/2.8 lens. I like carrying a pair of cameras on any serious photo trip because the second camera will sometimes save the day, if one camera is damaged. This happened to me climbing a ridge in Alaska. I fell and damaged one camera but, I was still able to shoot since I had a second camera. I am getting a bit old (82 on my last birthday) and weight is becoming a problem. Therefore, the small factor Sony APSC cameras fit my needs and this Sigma lens meshes very well with my A6600 (since the A6600 has IBIS). I wish however, that I could find a small form factor telephoto zoom which would match my 18-50mm Sigma in a two camera setup. I have a 70-200mm f/4 Sony but, being a full frame model, it is a bit heavy for my needs. I also have an APSC Sony 70-350mm but, that is a variable aperture lens and I really want a constant f/stop with a minimum of f/4 and I don't really need the wide range of 70-350mm. I don't absolutely need stabilization in that lens and would be happy to have one constructed of plastic like the Sigma. Presently, I make do with the 18-50mm along with my Sony 85mm f/1.8 lens. The 85mm is relatively light and is a great portrait glass but, I really would like a zoom of somewhere around 50 or 70mm to around 135 or 150mm with a minimum f/4 constant aperture. But, I would rather have a constant f/2.8 built along the lines of the Sigma 18-50mm lens. I think that such a lens could be light enough in weight o solve my problem,
You are unbelievable. I promise you I emailed them a few days ago and never heard back. How do you and I think so much alike? This is a great review of the lens. Thanks so much for doing this Mark
My camera is Sony ZV-E10. My main work is indoor/studio videography. I will also do outdoor videography and photography. My choice is Sigma 18-50 for being lightweight, handy, compact and minimum focusing distance of 12.1cm. On the other hand, Tamron 17-70 has an additional 20mm zoom and Image Stabilization. Since the Sony ZV-E10 doesn't have in-body image stabilization and the Tamron has image stabilization, I think it might be better for outdoor videography and photography. Since I haven't used either of them, I can't judge how effective the Image Stabilization is on the Tamron. Can you tell me which lens should I get for Sony ZV-E10? Reply please 🙏🙏🙏🙏
3 month ago, i just a newbie, you are my favorite reviewer Now, my knowledge is wayyy too far from me in the past, and you still my favorite reviewer Funny, infomative, detail, stunning quality,… although i have this lens already i still watch it again
Fantastic review Mark, thanks. I have my own lil’Dougy and just purchased the 18-50 Sigma lens for it based on your review. I didn’t think it was possible to fall in love with such a cheap lens but boy, this lens is a beauty. Thanks again for keeping us entertained mate.
great video, I would love to start to see some comparison now versus other zoom lenses; in fact, even though I know this lens to be more of a wide zoom it would be great to see a video against the TAMRON 11-20MM F/2.8. Thanks and keep up the great work.
I use the 16/1.4 on my M43 setup all the time and it always stuns me with its quality. So no surprise that this thing rocks. One thing…focus breathing generally refers to the size of objects changing when you zoom the lens, not going back and forward to a lens at a fixed length. That’s why it matters to videographers rather than photographers.
Woah Mark! Thanks for this video! That "macro" feature is such a nice hidden feature cuz I only know that by watching your videos. Other youtubers that I watch didn't mention any of that. Definitely getting this lens after contemplating for so long.
This video showed up on my feed again. Gotta be honest, I've purchased this lens about a year ago and it's the most versatile lens that I own. It's super sharp, constant f2.8 is amazing and the 18-50mm (27-75mm fullframe) focal range is fantastic. It's a very small lens and also incredibly light. I have only two issues with it, one is with the lens and one is more my own preference. The first issue is that it has no optical stabilization. As a bang for your buck lens, you might be on a budget, and your camerabody maybe doesn't have IBIS. This would mean that you have the possibility of unsharp images at lower shutter speeds. For 40% more in price, at least where I live in Europe, you could go for the Tamron 17-70mm, which has built-in optical stabilization but is way bigger and heavier. If you were to own a ZVE-10 (like many other people watching this channel) it might be scary at first, but something like the A6500 already has IBIS and could be picked up second hand for about the same price as a new ZV-E10. That would already solve a bunch of problems with this for photography, for videography it could help a bit. The other issue is that sometimes I feel like it's too wide at 18mm and not zoomed in enough at the 50mm focal range. I've purchased the fullframe 24-70mm f2.8 lens from Sigma, and use that on my crop sensor ZV-E10. The 36-105mm focal range really suits me and also gives me the possibility to upgrade to a fullframe camera down the line, so I get even more usage out of the lens. If there was a 36-105mm lens for APS-C I would instantly buy it, but this lens is as close to perfection as I could get it. Price vs Quality this is more bang for your buck than the Sigma 16mm f1.4 for me!
Even when sometimes (maybe 2 times out 10) i am not watching your vids for reviews i watch them because they me smile/laugh. So thanks for bringing those jokes and positivity into a lot of people's lives.. Love from India
Excellent review Mark. Always learn something practical and useful through your videos, especially for a newbie like me. As this will be my first zoom lens, I was comparing between Tamron 17-70mm and the Sony 16-55mm to this Sigma 16-50mm lens. In consideration of price, weight, performance(near to Sony's lens), and the ability to take macro shots, this lens is the zoom lens for me. Thanks a lot again.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis What would your choice if you own an Alpha 6400 and use it for handshots (so no stativ using), even in darker environment. The tamron has an stabilizer, the sigma not. I`m using the kit lens at the moment and are no pro. I just search for something to upgrade my setup without buying more than one lense. thank you!
After some 4+ hours of trying to decide which camera to aim for this video FINALLY helped me narrow down what to go with for my instruction videos and some less dry (read: boring as all heck Dad!) marketing content... Now it's just a small matter of running the purchase order past accounting... Thanks for the useful content.
16-50mm direct replacement for the kit would have been the ticket for me, and I'd be a buyer.. The macro, F2.8 and Sigma-quality AF are great selling points. Adding a prime would take too much time for lens changes. I like my kit lens, I did go through 3 before I found a good one though. Good review ... Cheers
Mark I love your videos. I wish you could test all these things to low light and under more harsh environments (this is a little bit too perfect compared to real life vlogging)
Lowlight depends a lot on the camera - and the amount of light a lens lets in is standardized. So a 2.8 will be the same in lowlight as any other 2.8 lens. So, if you want ultimate lowlight performance from a lens, look for the lowest f-stop you can find. The 1.4's from sigma are about as good as it gets (16mm, 30mm, 56mm)
Love your reviews Mark 👍. I’ve picked up this lens last week to go with my own little Dougie. I also dress up my ZV with the SmallRig L bracket with a wooden handle. This is a terrific setup. Light, compact, easy to handle. And the IQ is incredible. It’s now so easy to just pickup the camera anywhere all the time. f2.8, versatile standard zoom range, close focusing distance… Despite the lack of OSS, this lens ticks so many boxes. It’s a must have on the Sony apsc system imo.
Great review, thank you very much ! I actually just got a new ZV-E10 with a Sony 18-105 4 in order to have a all-terrain kind of lens with optical stabilisation, but you're now making me rethink my choice... I really considered the Sigma 18-50 2.8, but didn't go with it because it was lacking OS...
Stick with what you’ve got - stabilization, huge focal range - if that’s what you were looking for don’t second guess yourself. I do that all time - don’t be like me 🤣🤣
GREAT Thanks! I have the 16,30 and 56 trio from Sigma and consider them my go-to first choice on my a6000 AND my a7r ( Yes the original bought new at duty free in Dubai in 2010 (?). I currently use the a7r 28-70mm 3.5-5.6 kit lens on both but obviously take a hit on megapixels on the APSC. That kit lens on on the a6000 works as a native lens with the resolution loss is only noticeable when you recompose in post to correct what I should have done when shooting. However the a6000's 24 Mp drops to (variable) an average of 15Mp which is respectable and good for most media but limiting print quality. That zoom is beyond tempting. Thanks Mark.
You sir, are a gem 💎 Thank you for being you. Awesome video. You helped me make a purchase decision. You did so in style. Your neighbor is great too 😂🍻
As an equally handsome funny guy, I appreciate the humor you put into your videos. I don't know diddly squat about cameras but ready to watch and learn everything from you. Cheers! 🍻 (btw, that first bit was a joke so don't come after me fellow viewers lol)
I have been waiting for this video forever…. It’s weird that I just clicked on your channel now to see if it’s up yet and lo and behold .. 1 min ago you uploaded it 😬
I have ZV-E10 and this lens as my only video recording gadget, and I am exactly as happy as you. Go and sell out all your other gear, you don't need them! ;)
You’ve got a very good neighbor, mine has never offered me a beer. Great review, this goes on my wishlist. I’m really enjoying the ZV-E10 as a secondary camera, but it’s not taking in enough light with the kit lens. A constant aperture would be great too.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis that would be a great option too, though changing lenses while filming isn't that great, but the extra light could be very welcome. Something to consider, thanks!
I had shot on their EF mount 17-50 f/2.8 APS-C version of this lens for years for video work on my 80d, but the lens was very fragile and I had broke two of them. Glad to see they've made a lot of improvements to it, not only that thanks to your channel I'm planning on switching over to the ZV-E10 and it excites me my fav lens is available for it in a smaller form factor!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis The ZV-E10 seems like such an overlooked amazing camera to me, I think the picture profiles for grading on it are fantastic. my 80d and 17-50 F/2.8 certainly used to be a great combo a while ago!
you a funny dude lol. glad I found a camera guy with a sense of humor. new to photography and I'm falling asleep watching camera vids but yours are entertaining. thanks for the laughs, cheers!
I was confused to choose between sigma or tamron 17-70mm 2.8 But still choose sigma cause its small,compact,and lightweight But tamron have ois and much further focal length but the cost of heavier and bigger
After dipping through a lot of videos. Definitely on a bind now between the Sigma 18-50 F2.8 or Sigma 16 mm F1.4 haha (for studio video focus/product broll showcase type of work). With the Sigma 18-50 F2.8 more favorable as it indeed got more versatility. Good for a daily travel lens without the need to carry multiple lenses. And the fact that it can do macro stuff. But then again the 16mm f1.4 got its own charms too. And that its now £339 down from £449 while the 18-50 F2.8 is still at its release RRP at £429. Edit: And yes the difference is very clear, As I am watching this on an c1 oled 4K. Same on the other videos I commented before as to how your video examples really showed how powerful the camera's and lenses are. Unlike some other channels who share examples (specially vs smartphones) and their videos criminally insults the very capable camera's they are reviewing horribly. And yes, the videos are really helpful haha The channel is he'lla under rated or perhaps its just that most people might not like how fun your personality is lol with the jokey parts and all.
Great another video, Mark! I read a lot of comments asking and comparing the Sigma 16 and other 1.4 with this zoom. I’m wondering wich one choose too for my documentaries. Maybe you can do a video comparing this beasts!
I had to send the 18-50 back, but for your documentaries, get the 16 1.4. The 18-50 is a great travel lens, but that 1.4 gives you great lowlight and a fantastic blurry background. I do docs, and I always use the Sigma 16 1.4
Thanks for another awesome review. I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who have bought stuff because if your vids. I'd say you've already paid for that lens with all the 16mm you've "sold". They should let you keep it✌️ Hey Sigma. I've already bought a 16mm1.4 because of Mark. And now I'll have to get that pretty zoom thingy too...
I had this amazing lens in my hands Monday and immediately tested and reviewed it, it is absolutely amazing I really enjoy it and it will be my main lens for the Sony ZV-E10. Thanks for the complete review Mark
Thanks Mark, great review. I have got this lens for a week, one problem with this lens is vignetting, like a lot. But otherwise, I really like this one. Made to be paired with my ZV-E10.
Although I already bought the ZV1, but it's great to watch your videos. And this video is the right place for me to ask a question that has perplexed me for long. You are the right person to ask it to - Smartphones have tiny sensors and not much good lenses. But in daylight they give amazing results just on the basis of their software processing. But a camera like ZV1 has a bigger sensor and a good lens and yet it isn't miles ahead of a phone. I mean, under certain conditions, smartphones do come close to the ZV1. For example, there are videos in RUclips that compare the iPhone 13 to a 2000 dollar full frame Sony Cameras. And even with a tiny sensor and lens, the iPhone does give competition. To a non professional like me, under broad daylight, its impossible to tell the difference. Now my question is this - why can't cameras use the software processing of smartphones and add their sensor and lenses to it and give us something amazing. Sony already makes/made smartphones. Why couldn't they get the chip from one of their 200 dollar phone and put it in the ZV1 so we could get something amazing? (Thank you for reading. And your neighbour has been seeing you pace up and down in your backyard. So he offered you a beer)
Haha - yes - my neighbour is trying to help the lunatic 🤣🤣. Tony Northrup has been asking the same questions as you as to why can’t cameras don’t do the same things as phones. I do not know myself - I don’t know if it’s possible. Large phone companies have millions of dollars to invest because they sell so many. Mirrorless cameras do not make very much money compared to the sales of phones, so perhaps it’s just a question of money available for research and development. Or maybe it’s because when photographers get their cameras, they don’t want software taking the pics. I know that now that I know how to use my cameras, I never want an iPhone image because I don’t have control and the software makes the photo look like a cartoon and very processed when you compare the pictures large next to a big camera sensor. I do think, though to would be nice to have the software options if you wanted them. In a camera like a ZV1 with a one inch sensor and not having the ability to change lenses, that software could help a lot.
Software involves a lot of R&D and most likely camera companies do not have the budget and talents unlike tech giants like Apple/Google/Samsung etc. There is a HUGE demand for the small smartphone camera sensor to look like a big sensor professional camera while professional camera users generally have the skills to manipulate their photos and videos to get the looks & colours they want and they don't like it being dictated by the software algorithm, HENCE camera manufacturers have much less incentives to develop such software algorithms. BUT, as smartphone cameras are rapidly catching up to big mirrorless cameras, I think, camera manufacturers will invest more and more into computational photo/videography in order to differentiate themselves from smartphone cameras so people can still justify the purchase of a pro camera.
Thanks Mark for another informative review. Cameras and lenses almost and should have the rule I learned a long time ago back in the early 1980's buying stereo equipment. There was a point made by someone in a publication that explained people were buying stereo equipment backwards, meaning that people would go shopping and their priority was to buy the most kick-ass receiver as the priority and then after that the lighter wallet kicked in and then they bought speakers secondarily. The person who wrote the article told people to buy the best speakers possible first and then the receiver. I am going to apply this ideology to camera equipment. Buy the best lenses first and then the camera body second. Thanks again Mark. I always look forward to you videos.
very smart. I, myself, am guilty of obsessing over the cameras at times, but it’s the lenses that make the big difference. If you buy a GM lens, you can keep it for 20 years. next year, there’ll be a better camera.
Hi Mark, this is one of the most helpful video on this lens, especially the studio example. I am a Reviewer and use studio for 99% of my videos. I am using sigma 30mm for my A-rolls and kit 16-55mm for B-rolls since last 2 years and as you mentioned in the video, the distance adjustment and convenience is quite a issue. Now I am looking to replace both the sigma 30mm and kit 16-55mm with this new lens and would like your opinion on it. Thanks.
this can certainly do that - as long as you don’t use the 30 below 2.8 most of the time. there is a big difference between 2.8 and 1.4. So if you normally use the 30 at 2.8 and above - then this lens definitely can replace it
Hello Mark, first time I've seen any of your videos. You're a natural, very funny and could easily do stand up. Made me laugh a few times. 😂 Great review though. You thoroughly deserve Sigma to let you keep the lens. :D I bought the 18 to 50 f2.8 for my a6600 about 3 weeks ago and it's a really lovely bit of glass.
I have a Dell Ultrasharp 43" - 4k - The quality difference between the 2 lens is major. I just got a ZV-E10, they sold me (I chose, well you know) the Tamron 17-70 which is pretty good too. And I'm also Canadian, well French Canadian from Montreal, you cant have it all ! Ciao
So I’m already sold on the ZV E10. My goal is to use it mainly for music video shoots, livestreams, and event photography.. I was working myself up to plunge in and get the 3 sigma prime lenses to be able to cover all those areas but now I’m thinking this one lens could do it all very well and allow me to buy the 3 prime lenses one by one over time after recouping some of that initial investment.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis indeed I think it will! Although that bokeh on the 1.4’s looks soooooooo good! Did you find it to be that far off? I’ve watched this video like 10 times and it seems to be really close at the 2.8
Mark, another superb video! It’s like you custom made another video just for me -reading my mind as to what I want to know. And I’m sure you are to blame for this lens being out stock at B and H. 😂😁✌🏼Great review and also I got a great standup comedy show that is healing to my bones! 😁🙌🏼
Hi Mark, love your stuff. You help me with my own camera crisis. Question: How good is the macro capability compared to a Sony 50mm macro lens? I shoot underwater, and if his can shoot great macro at 50mm, it would save having to only choose a certain subject size pre-dive.
Hope the beer was good! Interesting review. I would definitely still have the Sigma 16 1.4 for videos. But this changes the relevance of the Sigma 30 1.4 and Sigma 56 1.4 to me. Maybe pairing the 16 with the 18-50 may be a more interesting / versatile combo.
@@danielpwagner not really. They’re 2 different lenses completely and serve different purposes. But if you’re comparing the 56 1.4 to an 18-50 to do the same job it’s not happening. APSC is super noisy at 2.8 vs 1.4 unless you’re doing long exposure and there’s no movement. Under most circumstances low light wise the 1.4 is the way to go. Unless you don’t have the room. Apples and oranges.
@@GRJCLyon sorry - I mistyped! I wanted to say that I need to learn a lot still 🙃 - thank you for the info, still learning a lot with my new toy. I have the kit lenses + sigma 16mm for the moment.
I am very tempted to get it for my A7IV. 14mpx would be good enough for travel. Light and versatile. Instead of carrying Full Frame Tamron 28-75mm, which is heavy for travel.
Hey Mark, I just recently got this lens because of your video. Did you experience any vignetting when shooting at F2.8 for it? I get some vignetting when shooting with mine at that aperture.
At 14:10 it seems to me that if you zoomed out to 16mm on the kit lens and turned on Active SteadyShot to get a 1.44 crop factor you would have had a very similar looking shot to the Sigma at 24mm with the camera at about the same distance and your light at the same 40% (maybe a touch brighter).
Mark, i deeply feel sad because you deserve lot more subscribers than this 😐 Keep bringing such informative videos. I'm also planning to replace my camera and fall on aps-c world. One love❤
how do I turn on autofocus when taking interval shots? Today, this camera really let me down, focusing only on the first frame, and blurring all the others
I really liked this lens so much,I might buy this lense as my first lense when I get a camera. Such a great review, I was hoping for something like this for a long time, I am literally obsessed with cameras and lenses,I have been learning about these things for about 2 years now and people like you really helps a lot. Just I wish I could use this knowledge in practical life, Cause I don't have a camera yet, But yeah I am willing to be a photographer in the future.Wish me Luck.😊
perfect! I bought bdy only on the zv-e10 and a sigma 16, but i feel like I might be missing out a bit on some zoom. This seems like it would be a great upgrade to the kit lens i didn't buy.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis dude thanks for your channel. Helped me pull the trigger on my new toys. Would be interesting to see how you setup Doug for streaming. It’s a whole other category but similar to video.
Great video as always! 💯🤝 Planning to migrate to Canada with the family, one of my bucket list is to meet you! 😂 You're a legend, you desrev more subs, keep it up sir!
Would love to see a comparasion of this lens with the Tamron 17-70 to compare sharpness and color cause the image stabilization and te extre mm range on the Tamron could easily beat this Sigma one
I think it’s a simple as, do you need the extra reach - if so - it’s clearly the Tamron. But it’s much bigger and much heavier. It does have the lens stabilization, so you have to think about what you need and how you shoot. Both great, sharp lenses.
Hi Mark, I am a newbie to camera's so I don't really understand all the technicalities of these camera and lenses but still i love watching your videos since you make them really interesting and funny. After watching your videos, I am convinced I need to buy the Sony ZV e10 camera but just confused if I should go for the kit lens which comes with ZV e10 or should I buy any other lens? What would you suggest? I have a small youtube channel which is growing so want to upgrade my setup and i make mainly sit and shoot videos (no vlogs). Would appreciate your suggestions.
It depends on your budget. If you are getting a kit lens along with the camera, the lens will only cost you $100 while other lenses will cost hundreds, if not, more than a thousand dollars. I'd say get the kit lens and use the heck out of it, learn from it, find out its limitations, and get lenses which you think will solve the limitations that the kit lens gives you. The reason being, if you want to get anything else other than the kit lens, the next question will be: Which lens to get? This is a question where only you can answer for yourself. You will notice what you need more, once you start using the kit lens a lot. Kit lens at $100, it is a cheap "starting point" and you upgrade from there on. Remember it is the skills, not the gear, that will get you far.
Sorry, I didn’t see the rest of your question for some reason. The kit lens is a good lens to figure out how you like to shoot. I personally recommend the Sigma 16mm 1.4 for a talking head studio lens. It’s amazingly sharp and bright lens and gives you a nice shallow depth of field. The link is in the description of this vid. 👍
@@gigihanmandarin thank you for the response, I think the sigma is a better lens so why spend 100$ for a average kit lens when I can just spend 250 more to buy a really good one
I love your sense of humor in your videos! 😊I'm not sure if you know the answer, but if you do, I'm curious to know whether you would recommend this lens or the Sony 18-105mm f/4 for a hybrid travel photographer?
Great review Mark, as always. Plus, you totally made my day on that last scene. I just can’t stop laughing 😂.... keep rocking! And congrats on the 5K!
Thanks for staying to the end to see it 🤣🤣
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thank you man 🙏. Believe it or not, I’m still laughing 😂
Totally, eh?!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis great work as always! It’s always fun and entertaining to watch ur videos.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis would like to know if zv-e10 has same BSI CMOS sensor like a6400. Thnx.
Come on, Sigma. Give him the lens. He just sold a ton of them for you. Great review!
I know, right??
Also sigma: if he already sold a ton when we lend it, what is the purpose to give him?
Just got my sigma 18 - 50
Waht you think about wedding filming with this lenses in specially in door? thanks in advance
Yes he has made a good sale promotion 😊
You are heads above most product reviewers, with a clear, warm and organized way of presenting comparisons. Great sense of humor also. How do you not have at least a million subscribers?
Thanks, Sctott - Nice of you to say!! The algorithm is holding me down 😂😂
14:59 this even checks out perfectly with the maths!
F2.8 is excactly 1 1/3 stops more than F4.5. So you need 130% more light to have the same exposure. You reduced your lights from 85% to 40% which is a 125% difference in light :D
gotta love math
this is excellent
I just got my Sigma 16 1.4 and I am now the Toneh master. I’m getting the 18-50 Ever since I started using manual mode for filming squirrels and amateur photography, I’m all about the bokeh. I love your content.
you and Kasey should do a squirrel documentary
"I could say mean things back, but I won't, because I'm Canadian." LOL
I love the form factor of the 18-50mm Sigma f/2.8 lens. I like carrying a pair of cameras on any serious photo trip because the second camera will sometimes save the day, if one camera is damaged. This happened to me climbing a ridge in Alaska. I fell and damaged one camera but, I was still able to shoot since I had a second camera.
I am getting a bit old (82 on my last birthday) and weight is becoming a problem. Therefore, the small factor Sony APSC cameras fit my needs and this Sigma lens meshes very well with my A6600 (since the A6600 has IBIS).
I wish however, that I could find a small form factor telephoto zoom which would match my 18-50mm Sigma in a two camera setup. I have a 70-200mm f/4 Sony but, being a full frame model, it is a bit heavy for my needs. I also have an APSC Sony 70-350mm but, that is a variable aperture lens and I really want a constant f/stop with a minimum of f/4 and I don't really need the wide range of 70-350mm. I don't absolutely need stabilization in that lens and would be happy to have one constructed of plastic like the Sigma.
Presently, I make do with the 18-50mm along with my Sony 85mm f/1.8 lens. The 85mm is relatively light and is a great portrait glass but, I really would like a zoom of somewhere around 50 or 70mm to around 135 or 150mm with a minimum f/4 constant aperture. But, I would rather have a constant f/2.8 built along the lines of the Sigma 18-50mm lens. I think that such a lens could be light enough in weight o solve my problem,
You are unbelievable. I promise you I emailed them a few days ago and never heard back. How do you and I think so much alike? This is a great review of the lens. Thanks so much for doing this Mark
Haha. Maybe email Sigma Canada - they were great 🤣🤣
I don't know why your channel doesn't have 300K subs, I find it the most informative and fun camera channel out there.
Thanks!! maybe in a few decades 🤣
My camera is Sony ZV-E10.
My main work is indoor/studio videography. I will also do outdoor videography and photography.
My choice is Sigma 18-50 for being lightweight, handy, compact and minimum focusing distance of 12.1cm.
On the other hand, Tamron 17-70 has an additional 20mm zoom and Image Stabilization.
Since the Sony ZV-E10 doesn't have in-body image stabilization and the Tamron has image stabilization, I think it might be better for outdoor videography and photography.
Since I haven't used either of them, I can't judge how effective the Image Stabilization is on the Tamron.
Can you tell me which lens should I get for Sony ZV-E10?
Reply please 🙏🙏🙏🙏
As a beginner in video, I’m literately binge watching ALL of your videos right now 😅 Such an amazing and insightful content 😮 Thank youuuuu !
Awesome! Thank you!
3 month ago, i just a newbie, you are my favorite reviewer
Now, my knowledge is wayyy too far from me in the past, and you still my favorite reviewer
Funny, infomative, detail, stunning quality,… although i have this lens already i still watch it again
great to hear!!
Fantastic review Mark, thanks. I have my own lil’Dougy and just purchased the 18-50 Sigma lens for it based on your review. I didn’t think it was possible to fall in love with such a cheap lens but boy, this lens is a beauty. Thanks again for keeping us entertained mate.
such a great lens - makes you just want to use it!!
great video, I would love to start to see some comparison now versus other zoom lenses; in fact, even though I know this lens to be more of a wide zoom it would be great to see a video against the TAMRON 11-20MM F/2.8. Thanks and keep up the great work.
I use the 16/1.4 on my M43 setup all the time and it always stuns me with its quality. So no surprise that this thing rocks. One thing…focus breathing generally refers to the size of objects changing when you zoom the lens, not going back and forward to a lens at a fixed length. That’s why it matters to videographers rather than photographers.
Thanks - here's a good article about focus breathing petapixel.com/focus-breathing/
Woah Mark! Thanks for this video! That "macro" feature is such a nice hidden feature cuz I only know that by watching your videos. Other youtubers that I watch didn't mention any of that. Definitely getting this lens after contemplating for so long.
Glad it was helpful!
Im not a videographer or photographer, but with Mark review I really excited to learn all of this!
This makes you awesome!!
“What does my soul say? Is it dark?… It is.”
haha - I forgot about that part
This video showed up on my feed again. Gotta be honest, I've purchased this lens about a year ago and it's the most versatile lens that I own. It's super sharp, constant f2.8 is amazing and the 18-50mm (27-75mm fullframe) focal range is fantastic. It's a very small lens and also incredibly light. I have only two issues with it, one is with the lens and one is more my own preference.
The first issue is that it has no optical stabilization. As a bang for your buck lens, you might be on a budget, and your camerabody maybe doesn't have IBIS. This would mean that you have the possibility of unsharp images at lower shutter speeds. For 40% more in price, at least where I live in Europe, you could go for the Tamron 17-70mm, which has built-in optical stabilization but is way bigger and heavier. If you were to own a ZVE-10 (like many other people watching this channel) it might be scary at first, but something like the A6500 already has IBIS and could be picked up second hand for about the same price as a new ZV-E10. That would already solve a bunch of problems with this for photography, for videography it could help a bit.
The other issue is that sometimes I feel like it's too wide at 18mm and not zoomed in enough at the 50mm focal range. I've purchased the fullframe 24-70mm f2.8 lens from Sigma, and use that on my crop sensor ZV-E10. The 36-105mm focal range really suits me and also gives me the possibility to upgrade to a fullframe camera down the line, so I get even more usage out of the lens.
If there was a 36-105mm lens for APS-C I would instantly buy it, but this lens is as close to perfection as I could get it. Price vs Quality this is more bang for your buck than the Sigma 16mm f1.4 for me!
thanks for giving the long term update!!
Congrats on 5️⃣K mate. When searching this particular lens your video came second. You definitely have become popular 👏
Nice!!
Even when sometimes (maybe 2 times out 10) i am not watching your vids for reviews i watch them because they me smile/laugh. So thanks for bringing those jokes and positivity into a lot of people's lives.. Love from India
Excellent review Mark. Always learn something practical and useful through your videos, especially for a newbie like me. As this will be my first zoom lens, I was comparing between Tamron 17-70mm and the Sony 16-55mm to this Sigma 16-50mm lens. In consideration of price, weight, performance(near to Sony's lens), and the ability to take macro shots, this lens is the zoom lens for me. Thanks a lot again.
Glad it was helpful!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis What would your choice if you own an Alpha 6400 and use it for handshots (so no stativ using), even in darker environment. The tamron has an stabilizer, the sigma not. I`m using the kit lens at the moment and are no pro. I just search for something to upgrade my setup without buying more than one lense. thank you!
I'm excited for Mark to start having sponsored sections!
I will never skip them, because I wanna see him on that creamy ZV-E10
Thanks 🤣🤣 I’ve had a couple of offers, but nothing I felt fit with the channel.
After some 4+ hours of trying to decide which camera to aim for this video FINALLY helped me narrow down what to go with for my instruction videos and some less dry (read: boring as all heck Dad!) marketing content... Now it's just a small matter of running the purchase order past accounting... Thanks for the useful content.
Great review. Really like the way you did side by side. I haven't seen much of that on other lens reviews.
I appreciate that!
From one great looking guy to another.... I really enjoy you humor and knowledge about camera equipment. Keep up your great work!
Because of your video I got the ZV-E10 body only and this Sigma 18-50, saved me $100 from having a duplicate zoom range kit lens. Thank you.
Mark, you crack me up. 😂 Fantastic review of the Sigma, by the way. And even if I know you rented it, I'm still jealous!
16-50mm direct replacement for the kit would have been the ticket for me, and I'd be a buyer.. The macro, F2.8 and Sigma-quality AF are great selling points. Adding a prime would take too much time for lens changes. I like my kit lens, I did go through 3 before I found a good one though. Good review ... Cheers
Yeah, for the wide shot, the 16 would have been great. So hard to find something perfect. Thanks, J.R.!!
Just bought the zv e10 body only and the sigma lens because of this video. Thanks for the humor and the wonderful information.
Good choice!
Mark I love your videos. I wish you could test all these things to low light and under more harsh environments (this is a little bit too perfect compared to real life vlogging)
Lowlight depends a lot on the camera - and the amount of light a lens lets in is standardized. So a 2.8 will be the same in lowlight as any other 2.8 lens. So, if you want ultimate lowlight performance from a lens, look for the lowest f-stop you can find. The 1.4's from sigma are about as good as it gets (16mm, 30mm, 56mm)
Awsome review as always. I really think that this will be my upgrade from the kit lens.
Good choice!
Your videos are so entertaining I would keep watching them even if I wasn't interested in cameras anymore 🤣
The best kind of viewer!! 👍
Love your reviews Mark 👍. I’ve picked up this lens last week to go with my own little Dougie. I also dress up my ZV with the SmallRig L bracket with a wooden handle. This is a terrific setup. Light, compact, easy to handle. And the IQ is incredible. It’s now so easy to just pickup the camera anywhere all the time. f2.8, versatile standard zoom range, close focusing distance… Despite the lack of OSS, this lens ticks so many boxes. It’s a must have on the Sony apsc system imo.
That’s a great setup and that wooden grip looks so cool
Great review, thank you very much !
I actually just got a new ZV-E10 with a Sony 18-105 4 in order to have a all-terrain kind of lens with optical stabilisation, but you're now making me rethink my choice... I really considered the Sigma 18-50 2.8, but didn't go with it because it was lacking OS...
Stick with what you’ve got - stabilization, huge focal range - if that’s what you were looking for don’t second guess yourself. I do that all time - don’t be like me 🤣🤣
That lens is HUGE.
Love the vibe and the review, if you only put more outdoor shoots it would be crazy 🔥But still what a review!!!❤️👍👍
GREAT Thanks! I have the 16,30 and 56 trio from Sigma and consider them my go-to first choice on my a6000 AND my a7r ( Yes the original bought new at duty free in Dubai in 2010 (?). I currently use the a7r 28-70mm 3.5-5.6 kit lens on both but obviously take a hit on megapixels on the APSC. That kit lens on on the a6000 works as a native lens with the resolution loss is only noticeable when you recompose in post to correct what I should have done when shooting. However the a6000's 24 Mp drops to (variable) an average of 15Mp which is respectable and good for most media but limiting print quality.
That zoom is beyond tempting. Thanks Mark.
You sir, are a gem 💎 Thank you for being you. Awesome video. You helped me make a purchase decision. You did so in style. Your neighbor is great too 😂🍻
🍺he’s a good guy!!
As an equally handsome funny guy, I appreciate the humor you put into your videos. I don't know diddly squat about cameras but ready to watch and learn everything from you. Cheers! 🍻 (btw, that first bit was a joke so don't come after me fellow viewers lol)
You’ll know it all in no time. My handsome face will tell you all of it 🤣🤣
Nice review Bro! I love this video. Thanks!
I have been waiting for this video forever…. It’s weird that I just clicked on your channel now to see if it’s up yet and lo and behold .. 1 min ago you uploaded it 😬
Ditto!
Always good to click on the channel at all times 🤣🤣
You are entertaining and very informative! Thank you
I really want this lens, just slightly out of my price range right now, ill just keep to swapping my sigma 16 & 30 1.4's
I have ZV-E10 and this lens as my only video recording gadget, and I am exactly as happy as you.
Go and sell out all your other gear, you don't need them! ;)
Great review Mark. Its fantastic! Loved from Rwanda
Thanks!!
You’ve got a very good neighbor, mine has never offered me a beer. Great review, this goes on my wishlist. I’m really enjoying the ZV-E10 as a secondary camera, but it’s not taking in enough light with the kit lens. A constant aperture would be great too.
Take a look at the sigma 1.4 trio. The 16, 30, and 56 - prime lenses that let in a ton of light
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis that would be a great option too, though changing lenses while filming isn't that great, but the extra light could be very welcome. Something to consider, thanks!
The ending was awesome, love your videos!😅
Thank you! 😁
Looking at this for my zv-e10. Appreciate the review. I enjoy your channel, Mark.
Thanks!!
I bought a ZVE10 because of you and I’m very mad 😡 because I’m in love for this camera 🥰
How could you not??
I had shot on their EF mount 17-50 f/2.8 APS-C version of this lens for years for video work on my 80d, but the lens was very fragile and I had broke two of them.
Glad to see they've made a lot of improvements to it, not only that thanks to your channel I'm planning on switching over to the ZV-E10 and it excites me my fav lens is available for it in a smaller form factor!
This lens and zv-e10 are a killer combo. and so small and light!!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis The ZV-E10 seems like such an overlooked amazing camera to me, I think the picture profiles for grading on it are fantastic.
my 80d and 17-50 F/2.8 certainly used to be a great combo a while ago!
That is hilarious! I have that same combo and looking to upgrade!
I subscribed for the humor alone 😄
Great review. Just ordered the lens. Wish I had neighbors like you. Thanks for the great videos. I am very happy I stumbled across your channel.
he helped me fix my garage too!!
Very helpful video, especially thanks to the comparison with Kit Lens. Thank You!
you a funny dude lol. glad I found a camera guy with a sense of humor. new to photography and I'm falling asleep watching camera vids but yours are entertaining. thanks for the laughs, cheers!
I appreciate that!
The CGI snow at the start was awesome!
I was just hired for the new Avatar movie. no one is blue this time
I was confused to choose between sigma or tamron 17-70mm 2.8
But still choose sigma cause its small,compact,and lightweight
But tamron have ois and much further focal length but the cost of heavier and bigger
After dipping through a lot of videos. Definitely on a bind now between the Sigma 18-50 F2.8 or Sigma 16 mm F1.4 haha (for studio video focus/product broll showcase type of work).
With the Sigma 18-50 F2.8 more favorable as it indeed got more versatility. Good for a daily travel lens without the need to carry multiple lenses. And the fact that it can do macro stuff.
But then again the 16mm f1.4 got its own charms too. And that its now £339 down from £449 while the 18-50 F2.8 is still at its release RRP at £429.
Edit:
And yes the difference is very clear, As I am watching this on an c1 oled 4K.
Same on the other videos I commented before as to how your video examples really showed how powerful the camera's and lenses are. Unlike some other channels who share examples (specially vs smartphones) and their videos criminally insults the very capable camera's they are reviewing horribly.
And yes, the videos are really helpful haha
The channel is he'lla under rated or perhaps its just that most people might not like how fun your personality is lol with the jokey parts and all.
Great another video, Mark! I read a lot of comments asking and comparing the Sigma 16 and other 1.4 with this zoom. I’m wondering wich one choose too for my documentaries. Maybe you can do a video comparing this beasts!
I had to send the 18-50 back, but for your documentaries, get the 16 1.4. The 18-50 is a great travel lens, but that 1.4 gives you great lowlight and a fantastic blurry background. I do docs, and I always use the Sigma 16 1.4
just placed my order with your link! appreciate the vid
That’s considerate of you - I appreciate it 👍👍
Sigma has released two of the three holy trinity lens. I am waiting for Sigma to release the third lens, i.e. 50-135mm f2.8 lens.
Mark what setting did you set when you were vloging on sigma 18-50, cause when i shootin the skin is look terrible
i usually manually white balance and use cine2 profile with the LeemingLUT
Great video, would love to see a comparison between the sony 16-55 f2.8 g vs the new sigma 18-50mm 2.8; to tell if spending more make a difference?
I had to send the sigma back, but from the tests I’ve seen from others, I would stick with the sigma. smaller and much cheaper.
Thanks for another awesome review.
I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who have bought stuff because if your vids.
I'd say you've already paid for that lens with all the 16mm you've "sold".
They should let you keep it✌️
Hey Sigma. I've already bought a 16mm1.4 because of Mark. And now I'll have to get that pretty zoom thingy too...
Haha - Sigma - do you hear this 🤣🤣
Mark I just got the Sigma 16mm f1.4 from the BF sale on B&H, only taken about 20 photos, but I already love it.
My fav lens for sure
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Can't wait to use it more, got home from work and finished the video. A great neighbor indeed.
Very usefull video ! thank you so much i send my kit lens back and bought the sigma :) since i can use the extra light !
I had this amazing lens in my hands Monday and immediately tested and reviewed it, it is absolutely amazing I really enjoy it and it will be my main lens for the Sony ZV-E10. Thanks for the complete review Mark
I will check out your review!!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thank you Mark but my reviews are not professional like yours, and thank you because I am learning a lot from your videos
@@TonysTravel Great lowlight footage - it was I was missing 🤣🤣
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thanks
Thanks Mark, great review. I have got this lens for a week, one problem with this lens is vignetting, like a lot. But otherwise, I really like this one. Made to be paired with my ZV-E10.
Make sure you enable lens corrections in your camera. Page 2 Lens Comp. Turn Shading, Chromatic and distortion comp to auto
Although I already bought the ZV1, but it's great to watch your videos. And this video is the right place for me to ask a question that has perplexed me for long. You are the right person to ask it to -
Smartphones have tiny sensors and not much good lenses. But in daylight they give amazing results just on the basis of their software processing.
But a camera like ZV1 has a bigger sensor and a good lens and yet it isn't miles ahead of a phone. I mean, under certain conditions, smartphones do come close to the ZV1.
For example, there are videos in RUclips that compare the iPhone 13 to a 2000 dollar full frame Sony Cameras. And even with a tiny sensor and lens, the iPhone does give competition. To a non professional like me, under broad daylight, its impossible to tell the difference.
Now my question is this - why can't cameras use the software processing of smartphones and add their sensor and lenses to it and give us something amazing. Sony already makes/made smartphones. Why couldn't they get the chip from one of their 200 dollar phone and put it in the ZV1 so we could get something amazing?
(Thank you for reading. And your neighbour has been seeing you pace up and down in your backyard. So he offered you a beer)
Haha - yes - my neighbour is trying to help the lunatic 🤣🤣. Tony Northrup has been asking the same questions as you as to why can’t cameras don’t do the same things as phones. I do not know myself - I don’t know if it’s possible. Large phone companies have millions of dollars to invest because they sell so many. Mirrorless cameras do not make very much money compared to the sales of phones, so perhaps it’s just a question of money available for research and development. Or maybe it’s because when photographers get their cameras, they don’t want software taking the pics. I know that now that I know how to use my cameras, I never want an iPhone image because I don’t have control and the software makes the photo look like a cartoon and very processed when you compare the pictures large next to a big camera sensor. I do think, though to would be nice to have the software options if you wanted them. In a camera like a ZV1 with a one inch sensor and not having the ability to change lenses, that software could help a lot.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thank you so much for your thoughts. It does make sense the way you put it.
Software involves a lot of R&D and most likely camera companies do not have the budget and talents unlike tech giants like Apple/Google/Samsung etc. There is a HUGE demand for the small smartphone camera sensor to look like a big sensor professional camera while professional camera users generally have the skills to manipulate their photos and videos to get the looks & colours they want and they don't like it being dictated by the software algorithm, HENCE camera manufacturers have much less incentives to develop such software algorithms.
BUT, as smartphone cameras are rapidly catching up to big mirrorless cameras, I think, camera manufacturers will invest more and more into computational photo/videography in order to differentiate themselves from smartphone cameras so people can still justify the purchase of a pro camera.
@@gigihanmandarin incredible. Thank you so much Tysun.
Thanks Mark for another informative review. Cameras and lenses almost and should have the rule I learned a long time ago back in the early 1980's buying stereo equipment. There was a point made by someone in a publication that explained people were buying stereo equipment backwards, meaning that people would go shopping and their priority was to buy the most kick-ass receiver as the priority and then after that the lighter wallet kicked in and then they bought speakers secondarily. The person who wrote the article told people to buy the best speakers possible first and then the receiver. I am going to apply this ideology to camera equipment. Buy the best lenses first and then the camera body second. Thanks again Mark. I always look forward to you videos.
very smart. I, myself, am guilty of obsessing over the cameras at times, but it’s the lenses that make the big difference. If you buy a GM lens, you can keep it for 20 years. next year, there’ll be a better camera.
Equally informative and fun. Great review!
Thanks!!
Hi Mark, this is one of the most helpful video on this lens, especially the studio example.
I am a Reviewer and use studio for 99% of my videos. I am using sigma 30mm for my A-rolls and kit 16-55mm for B-rolls since last 2 years and as you mentioned in the video, the distance adjustment and convenience is quite a issue.
Now I am looking to replace both the sigma 30mm and kit 16-55mm with this new lens and would like your opinion on it.
Thanks.
this can certainly do that - as long as you don’t use the 30 below 2.8 most of the time. there is a big difference between 2.8 and 1.4. So if you normally use the 30 at 2.8 and above - then this lens definitely can replace it
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thanks for the prompt reply 👍
Another stellar video Brother! Love your humor as always! Keep on shining bright! ❤❤❤
Thanks, Andray!!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Always Brother! You Rock!
Damnit Dougie. The results from the Sigma are outstanding. Looks like my bank account is going to become once again a desolate void. Great job Mark!
Join the club of void bank accounts due to camera gear. we’re a cool club
Hello Mark, first time I've seen any of your videos. You're a natural, very funny and could easily do stand up.
Made me laugh a few times. 😂 Great review though. You thoroughly deserve Sigma to let you keep the lens. :D I bought the 18 to 50 f2.8 for my a6600 about 3 weeks ago and it's a really lovely bit of glass.
Haha - thanks. You have a good eye - I’m actually a standup comic here in Canada. I have a whole other channel about it. Thanks for the kind words!!
I have a Dell Ultrasharp 43" - 4k - The quality difference between the 2 lens is major. I just got a ZV-E10, they sold me (I chose, well you know) the Tamron 17-70 which is pretty good too. And I'm also Canadian, well French Canadian from Montreal, you cant have it all ! Ciao
French Canadians are very welcomed on this channel. 😀🇨🇦
So I’m already sold on the ZV E10. My goal is to use it mainly for music video shoots, livestreams, and event photography.. I was working myself up to plunge in and get the 3 sigma prime lenses to be able to cover all those areas but now I’m thinking this one lens could do it all very well and allow me to buy the 3 prime lenses one by one over time after recouping some of that initial investment.
This lens will cover so much.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis indeed I think it will! Although that bokeh on the 1.4’s looks soooooooo good! Did you find it to be that far off? I’ve watched this video like 10 times and it seems to be really close at the 2.8
Mark, another superb video! It’s like you custom made another video just for me -reading my mind as to what I want to know. And I’m sure you are to blame for this lens being out stock at B and H. 😂😁✌🏼Great review and also I got a great standup comedy show that is healing to my bones! 😁🙌🏼
haha!! Healing to the bones!!
This lens is unbelievable
What a great review and that sense of humour! 😂 Subscribed immediately
Much appreciated!
Hi Mark, love your stuff. You help me with my own camera crisis.
Question: How good is the macro capability compared to a Sony 50mm macro lens? I shoot underwater, and if his can shoot great macro at 50mm, it would save having to only choose a certain subject size pre-dive.
Hope the beer was good! Interesting review. I would definitely still have the Sigma 16 1.4 for videos. But this changes the relevance of the Sigma 30 1.4 and Sigma 56 1.4 to me. Maybe pairing the 16 with the 18-50 may be a more interesting / versatile combo.
I like the primes myself for video. This lens is a great travel and versatile lens, but it would never fully replace that trio of 1.4’s for me
This lens will never be a 56 1.4.
@@GRJCLyon need to learn a lot still!
@@danielpwagner not really. They’re 2 different lenses completely and serve different purposes. But if you’re comparing the 56 1.4 to an 18-50 to do the same job it’s not happening. APSC is super noisy at 2.8 vs 1.4 unless you’re doing long exposure and there’s no movement. Under most circumstances low light wise the 1.4 is the way to go. Unless you don’t have the room. Apples and oranges.
@@GRJCLyon sorry - I mistyped! I wanted to say that I need to learn a lot still 🙃 - thank you for the info, still learning a lot with my new toy. I have the kit lenses + sigma 16mm for the moment.
Damn you! I just bought this lens because of your video.
I regret nothing!!
Hey. Great video. Do you recomend this lense cooking video, filming food cook in the pan and so on? keep up the great work
I am very tempted to get it for my A7IV. 14mpx would be good enough for travel. Light and versatile. Instead of carrying Full Frame Tamron 28-75mm, which is heavy for travel.
If you are ok with the 14mpx - this could definitely work. Can do macro too.
Hey Mark, I just recently got this lens because of your video. Did you experience any vignetting when shooting at F2.8 for it? I get some vignetting when shooting with mine at that aperture.
At 14:10 it seems to me that if you zoomed out to 16mm on the kit lens and turned on Active SteadyShot to get a 1.44 crop factor you would have had a very similar looking shot to the Sigma at 24mm with the camera at about the same distance and your light at the same 40% (maybe a touch brighter).
If you update the firmware of the kit lens, it'll tuck itself back in after... not that you need it any more with that Sigma.
When you said no to that beer I was losing faith, so you accepted, my soul returned to my body.
I initially refused because it was a Coors Light, but then I thought, well, it’s still beer
I've been trying for days to decide between the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Contemporary and the Sony 16-55mm f/2.8 G
They're both great. The Sony has a slight edge in quality - but the sigma is smaller and lighter and better at close-up focusing
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Gracias
Mark, i deeply feel sad because you deserve lot more subscribers than this 😐
Keep bringing such informative videos. I'm also planning to replace my camera and fall on aps-c world. One love❤
Ha - Im just glad people are watching. The RUclips algorithm will catch up eventually. 😃
how do I turn on autofocus when taking interval shots? Today, this camera really let me down, focusing only on the first frame, and blurring all the others
12:18 Not only a stark difference between the same focal length but the kit lens looks much better! How?!
I really liked this lens so much,I might buy this lense as my first lense when I get a camera. Such a great review, I was hoping for something like this for a long time,
I am literally obsessed with cameras and lenses,I have been learning about these things for about 2 years now and people like you really helps a lot. Just I wish I could use this knowledge in practical life, Cause I don't have a camera yet, But yeah I am willing to be a photographer in the future.Wish me Luck.😊
It’s a great lens and will help you as a photographer for sure 👍👍
perfect! I bought bdy only on the zv-e10 and a sigma 16, but i feel like I might be missing out a bit on some zoom. This seems like it would be a great upgrade to the kit lens i didn't buy.
It really is 👍
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis dude thanks for your channel. Helped me pull the trigger on my new toys. Would be interesting to see how you setup Doug for streaming. It’s a whole other category but similar to video.
@@sodathief I’ll try to do a streaming one one of these days!!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis I got a dumb question… what does this focus ring do on the sigma 16? It just spins and I can’t tell lol
@@sodathief When the camera is in manual focus, it will change the focus. In autofocus mode, it will do nothing 👍
hello! love this review! just wanting to know how well does this do in low light situations?
Great video as always! 💯🤝 Planning to migrate to Canada with the family, one of my bucket list is to meet you! 😂 You're a legend, you desrev more subs, keep it up sir!
neighbor offers you a beer
thats a wholesome moment right
Would love to see a comparasion of this lens with the Tamron 17-70 to compare sharpness and color cause the image stabilization and te extre mm range on the Tamron could easily beat this Sigma one
I think it’s a simple as, do you need the extra reach - if so - it’s clearly the Tamron. But it’s much bigger and much heavier. It does have the lens stabilization, so you have to think about what you need and how you shoot. Both great, sharp lenses.
Hi Mark,
I am a newbie to camera's so I don't really understand all the technicalities of these camera and lenses but still i love watching your videos since you make them really interesting and funny.
After watching your videos, I am convinced I need to buy the Sony ZV e10 camera but just confused if I should go for the kit lens which comes with ZV e10 or should I buy any other lens?
What would you suggest?
I have a small youtube channel which is growing so want to upgrade my setup and i make mainly sit and shoot videos (no vlogs).
Would appreciate your suggestions.
Great to hear!! you’ll pick it up in no time. 👍
It depends on your budget. If you are getting a kit lens along with the camera, the lens will only cost you $100 while other lenses will cost hundreds, if not, more than a thousand dollars. I'd say get the kit lens and use the heck out of it, learn from it, find out its limitations, and get lenses which you think will solve the limitations that the kit lens gives you.
The reason being, if you want to get anything else other than the kit lens, the next question will be: Which lens to get? This is a question where only you can answer for yourself. You will notice what you need more, once you start using the kit lens a lot. Kit lens at $100, it is a cheap "starting point" and you upgrade from there on. Remember it is the skills, not the gear, that will get you far.
Sorry, I didn’t see the rest of your question for some reason. The kit lens is a good lens to figure out how you like to shoot. I personally recommend the Sigma 16mm 1.4 for a talking head studio lens. It’s amazingly sharp and bright lens and gives you a nice shallow depth of field. The link is in the description of this vid. 👍
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thank you Mark for the response..
Yeah I may consider buying the sigma 16mm 1.4 lens..
@@gigihanmandarin thank you for the response, I think the sigma is a better lens so why spend 100$ for a average kit lens when I can just spend 250 more to buy a really good one
I love your sense of humor in your videos! 😊I'm not sure if you know the answer, but if you do, I'm curious to know whether you would recommend this lens or the Sony 18-105mm f/4 for a hybrid travel photographer?