If you just needed or even wanted the center channel, this is IT! The last scene played gave me chills! It plays as if it fills the entire frontstage ALONE! 😁😁😁
As a native Wisconsinite I am proud but also moderately perplexed by the fact that 2 of the most popular speakers companies on home theater RUclips channels (Perlisten and JTR) are both from based in Wisconsin. I guess it make sense being that this state is a frozen wasteland for 4 to 6 months every year so staing inside and watching movies and listening to music is a preferable option over dong things outdoors during those months.
I absolutely love that checkerboard pattern. These are likely endgame for many folks. Shockingly, I could easily tell the difference between these and the focals you demo’d. What a set. I’m super interested in their new in wall collection too.
The checkerboard pattern woofers are made by SB Acoustics. Engineered in Denmark. Lars Johansen from Perlisten is also danish. He used to work for M&K Sound
It's always another company around the corner, when it comes to home theater. It's an Expensive hobby. We upgrade to upgrade to upgrade, and then we change everything to start over again.
Seems like a very nice setup theese Perlistens 😊 I do run all my speakers in large btw, with 3 subs on top of that. I do have 3 towers LCR, and a tower as centee rear. They are all fullrange. Sidesurrounds and heightchannels only play well down to about 45hz, but since I have subs in addition on all channels, it works really well. 😊
Nice to hear someone else talking about the importance of the centre channel! I totally agree. Love the lighting you use in your theatre room for the videos, by the way. Very classy. 👍🏻☺️
I'm not the biggest fan of the checkerboard pattern but it's good to see your $ is actually going towards aesthetics and build quality. No "bed liner" finish in sight. Looks like first-rate performance and worth saving your spare change for.
The checkerboard pattern is not actually for aesthetics and not a perlisten limited technology. It's textreme, which is basically just carbon fiber but the pattern helps to distribute the breakup modes.
Lets all hope these are bought by lots of people and then Perlisten can create a more affordable version with some of the same technology they're using to make them so good. I will certainly be buying them if they do so, as many others would I imagine.
@@therealshanelee I wish you can find a space in your HT to test it. As I cannot find any Illusion center channel review. And I am quite sure if you ask Martin Logan, they will send you one for review. And I know Martin Logan is one of your fav speaker 😀.
Do the Martin Logan folded motion tweeter sound come close to a beryllium tweeters? I remember awhile back when you reviewed the ML Motion series the FMT blew you away.
I work in the industry and have heard most things. After years of listening I’m not all that impressed with most AMT tweeters. I still prefer good domes. Especially beryllium and even some soft domes. The one exception to this is true planar drivers such as used by Wisdom Audio. Though I will say the AMTs used by Monitor Audio or Eikon for example are pretty good.
My setup doesn’t approach the price of the Perlisten. But I do have a comment on crossovers. I have Polk R700 fronts, L400 center, R200 rear surrounds, and an SVS SB-1000 in a 5.1. I’m running the LCR off Emotiva HC-1 monoblocks and the surrounds off of the TX-RZ50 AVR. I like to watch movies at reference volume fairly often. I have found that I prefer running the fronts full range and crossing the center and surrounds at 40. The speakers have a lot of bass to contribute and I enjoy bass coming from the rear speakers. According to my DIRAC measurements the fronts have an in-room response all the way to 23Hz. I don’t see a reason to give that up by setting them to small. Especially since “double bass” is an option on my AVR so I don’t lose the sub’s help.
These look pretty awesome, though I've never been impressed with a horizontally-oriented design for a center channel. Reason being is that it collapses the sound stage a bit. Yes the tweeter and mid range are right in the middle, but the woofers extend quite far from the actual center. I don't care what anyone says, bass is directional. Sadly not everyone can have a vertically-oriented center channel... just one of those bad things about being in a home rather than a real theater I guess. You could always go the old AMC TORUS/HITS route and have the tweeter and midrange at the top of your screen and the woofers at the bottom. Actually I don't recommend anyone try to replicate anything AMC does at home... but with a smaller home screen it might not be so awful. Of course ideally everything would be behind the screen. And yes I run everything full range here. Again bass is directional. Home THX can get fukt, cinema THX specs are where it's at.
I’m just starting to learn about speakers and placement etc. Can you provide a link to any website that shows info/ graphs of the sound being squeezed if a center channel is horizontal (vs vertical if possible). Thanks!
@@rogerhalt3991 google MTM center channel configuration issues ... in short, human hearing is very sensitive in horizontal plane and not so in vertical plane.. thats why MTM design can be pretty bad in horizontal usage and not a problem in vertical usage..
@@rogerhalt3991 I have no graphs, but think of it this way: if the Left, Center, and Right speakers are all playing the same sound simultaneously (like the OG Lion King Blu-ray from a while back) the sounds don't appear exactly from the center, especially if you're not sitting directly in the center. Now a sound bar wouldn't be this bad and like I said at least the treble and the mid range are directly in the center, but having the woofers out so wide would alter it a little. Oriented vertically, everything is perfectly in the center.
Martin Logan = MoneyLaundering Youre getting ripped off for a brand name my friend.Quite a few comparable speaker brands out there for FAR less cheddar
I had heard the Perlisten setup at the Tampa Audio show and they were easily in the top 5 best of the show. Borreson, TAD, Raidho, Focal, and Perlisten were the top five in descending order in my opinion at the show. Martin Logan and Bowers weren't there to add to the list.
I know they're extremely new, but is there any chance you will be able to compare these to the slightly less expensive R7t line? This setup you're showing here costs more than a new car and is out of reach for 99% of people. That said, I'd really like to hear them in person to see if they actually sound 5x better than a $1500 speaker.
@@lukerestlessstudios I got the Arendal 1723s monitor surround set because of Shane lol. They’re in my eyes the best speaker out there for the price. I’m sure the Perlistens are amazing! I’ll get the Trinnov altitude and perliston in my next set up. Right now I’m completely blown away by the xmc-2, Dr3, XPA 11 and my 2 PB3000 subs plus 4 Atmos SVS ceiling speakers. It sounds better than my local cinema especially after running dirac. Watching 2012, Fury, 300, avengers movies has been such a treat. It’s like watching them all over again at the cinema. The Arendals and Xmc-2 are just amazing
@@zbigniewkrol3899 Technology doesn't ever stand still........ The Perlisten S series is truly reference! But future Perlisten flagship series can still potentially be even better. Replace the MDF cabinet with a better stronger HDF or Valchromat cabinet. Use the second generation recently released Textreme Metamodal TX woofers. Even the tweeter could use the Textreme Metamodal TX as it's better performance and cheaper than a beryllium tweeter. Ex Machina a fairly new New York company are getting hype like Perlisten but for active studio monitors. There second generation Pulsar MKII & Quasar MKII use valchromat cabinets. And the new second generation Textreme Metamodal TX for their coaxial mid range and tweeter.
I have a complete Arendal setup they are amazing these are 5 x the price with probably 2x the performance but you'll need to have the amps to drive these to their full potential. Amazing speakers but my wallet would never forgive me. Arendal are more then enough the 1723 series are amazing and they won't break the bank for what they are capable of. I bought last year before the price increase but still worth it as every other brand got a 15 percent increase with the inflation across the world
@@taxi615 I have the Arendals as well and absolutely love them. Since they were both designed by the same person I was just wondering how they compare. Cheers 🍻
@@themorg3300 I also have the Arendal 1723s monitors for front stage, 1723s surrounds, 4 ceiling SVS heights, 1 pB 3000, XLA DR3 for front stage, XLA 200 for surrounds, fosi mini amps for heights, emotiva XMC-2 for processing and a Vava 4k 150’ screen. I’m soo happy with my set up. The XMC-2 was way better than the previous Denon 4700 in pre amp mode and the previous Marantz 7706 I was testing out. I also have 6 Gik accoustic panels in my set up and everything sounds like an actual theater. I have a dedicated theater room which me and my fiancée enjoy. This hobby gets to be up there in price and when my bitcoins hit $150k, I’ll sell a couple and buy this perlisten system with the Trinov. Shane’s content made me buy all my gear lol. Now I have GOALS 🙏🏽😊
Smart to make a make a soundbar sized center but these are expensive. It's interesting how the surrounds are practically baby-sized showing how It's $30k for the LCR. I'd love to see what the music sounds like - is it theater style (loud but meh) or is it actually engaging and moving?
I know you wanted to compare the S7c to something....but not a fair comparison to the Kanta. The Perlisten is nearly double everything. Price, weight, driver config. Plus it is sealed versus ported. Kudos to Perlisten for that but it comes at a hefty price. The Kanta will distort more because of the bass reflex design. This is elementary.
@@pulDag they wouldn't be around for as long as they've been around and they wouldn't have people buying their thousands of dollars speakers if they were just good looking
@@ryanschipp8513 it is so called high end / marketing. There are only few audiophiles buying so expensive equipment. The main group of buyers want something excellent looking. Ofcourse it must sound good, but for their untrained ears everything sounds better than what they are used to. Thats why everybody buys b&w and McIntosh eventhough there are always better alternatives for the price. Not saying all the Focals are shait, but for their price are average or sub-par. Look at their subwoofers.. my 2c
Cost of them is ridiculous though. Not worth that much in my opinion. I could get bookshelves paired with separate sub each and be cheaper and much better.
Always run full range. In your set up I would set the rears to small (80hz crossover) and leave the fronts and centre on full range. For me I run my fronts with high level support from my Rel sub. Not that they need much!! Centre and Rears full range with no support.
Maybe, but you'd be crazy not to go with whatever sounds best rather than choosing based on looks, especially for home theatre where you shouldn't even see the speakers.
@@rosstee I hear you I like looks and sound for me perlisten wouldn't make it in my house even if it sounds better than sopra , I will go for sonas Farber or Wilson Audio in that price range
@@jm-vq4cm when you step up to a certain level of quality sound and build, you’ll get why it’s priced as such. There’s plenty folks that find the value in products at this level.
BUY HERE: 👇
Dream Media: tinyurl.com/mrbcb7wx
If you just needed or even wanted the center channel, this is IT! The last scene played gave me chills! It plays as if it fills the entire frontstage ALONE! 😁😁😁
You'd have to be there to make that claim. You can't hear something like that through RUclips on your speakers.
@@ryanschipp8513 was gunna say the same
@@ryanschipp8513 exactly. some people are so thick.
As a native Wisconsinite I am proud but also moderately perplexed by the fact that 2 of the most popular speakers companies on home theater RUclips channels (Perlisten and JTR) are both from based in Wisconsin. I guess it make sense being that this state is a frozen wasteland for 4 to 6 months every year so staing inside and watching movies and listening to music is a preferable option over dong things outdoors during those months.
Gorgeous speakers.
If these speakers are a 10 for movie watching only. What would you rate the Arendals ? ( considering just the sound quality not the cost etc. )
Fantastic to see all these models out in the wild. Great speaker design / capability. Love the tech behind them.
I absolutely love that checkerboard pattern. These are likely endgame for many folks.
Shockingly, I could easily tell the difference between these and the focals you demo’d.
What a set. I’m super interested in their new in wall collection too.
The checkerboard pattern woofers are made by SB Acoustics. Engineered in Denmark. Lars Johansen from Perlisten is also danish. He used to work for M&K Sound
@@janthomassrensen1065 explains the push pull sub.....nobody does this anymore
@@Stan_the_Belgian M&K sound still does it. They invented the push/pull and they are still the best on the market to execute it.
@SpareChange how would you compare these to the Arendal 1723 series that you reviewed before?
Love these speakers, Perlisten did a great job designing these speakers.
....good lord.. that subwoofer motor structure is HUGE!! .. wow.
This is unusually high praise from Shane, but probably rightfully so. It definitely made me consider the Perlistens as my next speaker purchase.
It's always another company around the corner, when it comes to home theater. It's an Expensive hobby. We upgrade to upgrade to upgrade, and then we change everything to start over again.
They also have these for demo purpose so it's OK they set up with expensive gear. Sell expensive make high profits
Gimme, gimme, gimme!! I need that center channel. It looks so badass. Thanks Shane!
Seems like a very nice setup theese Perlistens 😊
I do run all my speakers in large btw, with 3 subs on top of that. I do have 3 towers LCR, and a tower as centee rear. They are all fullrange. Sidesurrounds and heightchannels only play well down to about 45hz, but since I have subs in addition on all channels, it works really well. 😊
Nice to hear someone else talking about the importance of the centre channel! I totally agree.
Love the lighting you use in your theatre room for the videos, by the way. Very classy. 👍🏻☺️
I'm not the biggest fan of the checkerboard pattern but it's good to see your $ is actually going towards aesthetics and build quality. No "bed liner" finish in sight.
Looks like first-rate performance and worth saving your spare change for.
The checkerboard pattern is not actually for aesthetics and not a perlisten limited technology. It's textreme, which is basically just carbon fiber but the pattern helps to distribute the breakup modes.
Hiya! Also interested to hear how these compare to your Arendals?
How would you compare the Perlistens to the Arendals ? out of 10 ?
I'd need to do a side by side to give an honest answer. Haven't heard the Arendal in over a year.
The big question is how good are their lower models. For the ones that can not afford these?
Big fan of low volume performance 🥳
Lets all hope these are bought by lots of people and then Perlisten can create a more affordable version with some of the same technology they're using to make them so good. I will certainly be buying them if they do so, as many others would I imagine.
How do they compare to the Arendals?
Something I want to know since Dan helped develop the arendals
these, the procellas or ascendos? for movie listening only.
Nice center channel. Just wondering how this center channel compare to Martin Logan Illusion C34A center channel.
I'd have no space to fit that. I've looked into it already.
@@therealshanelee I wish you can find a space in your HT to test it. As I cannot find any Illusion center channel review. And I am quite sure if you ask Martin Logan, they will send you one for review. And I know Martin Logan is one of your fav speaker 😀.
Do the Martin Logan folded motion tweeter sound come close to a beryllium tweeters? I remember awhile back when you reviewed the ML Motion series the FMT blew you away.
FMTs have been where it is at for a while.My Emotiva T2s are amazing.Much rather go with that personally
I work in the industry and have heard most things. After years of listening I’m not all that impressed with most AMT tweeters. I still prefer good domes. Especially beryllium and even some soft domes. The one exception to this is true planar drivers such as used by Wisdom Audio. Though I will say the AMTs used by Monitor Audio or Eikon for example are pretty good.
What was the first movie with Eminem? Haven't seen him act in awhile, looked interesting.
Thank you Shane for another greatly produced review. Appreciated.
Shane from your experience between M&K S150 and Perlisten, which sounds more astounding and realistic?
My setup doesn’t approach the price of the Perlisten. But I do have a comment on crossovers.
I have Polk R700 fronts, L400 center, R200 rear surrounds, and an SVS SB-1000 in a 5.1. I’m running the LCR off Emotiva HC-1 monoblocks and the surrounds off of the TX-RZ50 AVR. I like to watch movies at reference volume fairly often.
I have found that I prefer running the fronts full range and crossing the center and surrounds at 40. The speakers have a lot of bass to contribute and I enjoy bass coming from the rear speakers. According to my DIRAC measurements the fronts have an in-room response all the way to 23Hz. I don’t see a reason to give that up by setting them to small. Especially since “double bass” is an option on my AVR so I don’t lose the sub’s help.
These look pretty awesome, though I've never been impressed with a horizontally-oriented design for a center channel. Reason being is that it collapses the sound stage a bit. Yes the tweeter and mid range are right in the middle, but the woofers extend quite far from the actual center. I don't care what anyone says, bass is directional. Sadly not everyone can have a vertically-oriented center channel... just one of those bad things about being in a home rather than a real theater I guess. You could always go the old AMC TORUS/HITS route and have the tweeter and midrange at the top of your screen and the woofers at the bottom. Actually I don't recommend anyone try to replicate anything AMC does at home... but with a smaller home screen it might not be so awful. Of course ideally everything would be behind the screen. And yes I run everything full range here. Again bass is directional. Home THX can get fukt, cinema THX specs are where it's at.
I must say you have one of my favorite RUclips channels it’s cool that you’re in the home theater also
I’m just starting to learn about speakers and placement etc. Can you provide a link to any website that shows info/ graphs of the sound being squeezed if a center channel is horizontal (vs vertical if possible). Thanks!
@@rogerhalt3991 google MTM center channel configuration issues ... in short, human hearing is very sensitive in horizontal plane and not so in vertical plane.. thats why MTM design can be pretty bad in horizontal usage and not a problem in vertical usage..
@@rogerhalt3991 I have no graphs, but think of it this way: if the Left, Center, and Right speakers are all playing the same sound simultaneously (like the OG Lion King Blu-ray from a while back) the sounds don't appear exactly from the center, especially if you're not sitting directly in the center. Now a sound bar wouldn't be this bad and like I said at least the treble and the mid range are directly in the center, but having the woofers out so wide would alter it a little. Oriented vertically, everything is perfectly in the center.
i have my Martin Logans running at all ranges in all speakers. 5.1 setup with svs ultra woofer
Martin Logan = MoneyLaundering
Youre getting ripped off for a brand name my friend.Quite a few comparable speaker brands out there for FAR less cheddar
@@jaydoublebusy such as?
@@mixedup5858 Emotiva for one
Damn, didn't expect those price tags...4k for a surround speaker? Crazy! Also don't get the piano finish for ht use
I had heard the Perlisten setup at the Tampa Audio show and they were easily in the top 5 best of the show.
Borreson, TAD, Raidho, Focal, and Perlisten were the top five in descending order in my opinion at the show.
Martin Logan and Bowers weren't there to add to the list.
I know they're extremely new, but is there any chance you will be able to compare these to the slightly less expensive R7t line? This setup you're showing here costs more than a new car and is out of reach for 99% of people. That said, I'd really like to hear them in person to see if they actually sound 5x better than a $1500 speaker.
@@lukerestlessstudios I got the Arendal 1723s monitor surround set because of Shane lol. They’re in my eyes the best speaker out there for the price. I’m sure the Perlistens are amazing! I’ll get the Trinnov altitude and perliston in my next set up. Right now I’m completely blown away by the xmc-2, Dr3, XPA 11 and my 2 PB3000 subs plus 4 Atmos SVS ceiling speakers. It sounds better than my local cinema especially after running dirac. Watching 2012, Fury, 300, avengers movies has been such a treat. It’s like watching them all over again at the cinema. The Arendals and Xmc-2 are just amazing
@@raymondayala5355 Forgive my ignorance because I've never bought separates, but how do you use both the DR3 and the XPA 11?
@@Smellslikegelfling you have to connect them to a processor via balanced XLR cables or unbalanced RCA cables that then connect to your speaker
@@raymondayala5355 what I meant was, why have two amps? Do you have a lot of speakers?
@@Smellslikegelfling yes I do. The Dr3 handles the front 3 and the XPA 11 handles surrounds and Atmos
Do you use your i-pad to control all of your equipment and do you have a video for that? Great Video!
ruclips.net/video/stjIZ2euDpU/видео.html
Dexter gloves are on when you see that beautiful finish
🧤
Darn! Couldn't find any of these on OfferUp.
Perlisten is end game for sure. ❤🔥❤🔥❤
I think it's not the last word from Perlisten and Mr. Dan Roemer.
@@zbigniewkrol3899 Technology doesn't ever stand still........
The Perlisten S series is truly reference! But future Perlisten flagship series can still potentially be even better.
Replace the MDF cabinet with a better stronger HDF or Valchromat cabinet. Use the second generation recently released Textreme Metamodal TX woofers.
Even the tweeter could use the Textreme Metamodal TX as it's better performance and cheaper than a beryllium tweeter.
Ex Machina a fairly new New York company are getting hype like Perlisten but for active studio monitors. There second generation Pulsar MKII & Quasar MKII use valchromat cabinets. And the new second generation Textreme Metamodal TX for their coaxial mid range and tweeter.
Do you think it's better? b&w c800
The only question I have for Shane is, are you keeping them 🤔?
how much does it cost the full setup of focal kanta 3 or chora 826
Great video as always!! How do they compare to Arendal?
I have a complete Arendal setup they are amazing these are 5 x the price with probably 2x the performance but you'll need to have the amps to drive these to their full potential. Amazing speakers but my wallet would never forgive me. Arendal are more then enough the 1723 series are amazing and they won't break the bank for what they are capable of. I bought last year before the price increase but still worth it as every other brand got a 15 percent increase with the inflation across the world
@@taxi615 I have the Arendals as well and absolutely love them. Since they were both designed by the same person I was just wondering how they compare. Cheers 🍻
@@themorg3300 sorry I took it like you were shopping for new speakers.
@@taxi615 no worries, these ones are way out of my price range lol
@@themorg3300 I also have the Arendal 1723s monitors for front stage, 1723s surrounds, 4 ceiling SVS heights, 1 pB 3000, XLA DR3 for front stage, XLA 200 for surrounds, fosi mini amps for heights, emotiva XMC-2 for processing and a Vava 4k 150’ screen. I’m soo happy with my set up. The XMC-2 was way better than the previous Denon 4700 in pre amp mode and the previous Marantz 7706 I was testing out. I also have 6 Gik accoustic panels in my set up and everything sounds like an actual theater. I have a dedicated theater room which me and my fiancée enjoy. This hobby gets to be up there in price and when my bitcoins hit $150k, I’ll sell a couple and buy this perlisten system with the Trinov. Shane’s content made me buy all my gear lol. Now I have GOALS 🙏🏽😊
Beautiful speakers! For home theater would you prefer the towers and sub or the bookshelves with subs?
Can't say till I hear the towers.
Hi I know this is off topic would you recommend any setting for the sn11rg l know you did a review on it
Smart to make a make a soundbar sized center but these are expensive. It's interesting how the surrounds are practically baby-sized showing how
It's $30k for the LCR.
I'd love to see what the music sounds like - is it theater style (loud but meh) or is it actually engaging and moving?
Even over RUclips, you can hear the clarity of the perlisten center. There is a capacity to allow dynamic sound to flow out with ease and precision.
Excellent
What are the dimensions of your HT room?
I think so 😎
I don’t see THX mentioned much these days, does the certification actually matter?
Or THX 2/Sound Plus...
Beautiful speakers
What do you need to power them? Were those banana plugs on the back?
Maybe I missed it, but what did you run your crossover at for your lcr? Thanks
80
Awesome speakers 😁😁😁
I know you wanted to compare the S7c to something....but not a fair comparison to the Kanta. The Perlisten is nearly double everything. Price, weight, driver config. Plus it is sealed versus ported. Kudos to Perlisten for that but it comes at a hefty price. The Kanta will distort more because of the bass reflex design. This is elementary.
I've had cheaper centers not distort like that. Sealed and ported.
@@therealshanelee Well then that is on Focal. Unacceptable for a 4k speaker.
Focal is everything just not competetive. It's primary goal is looking good.
@@pulDag they wouldn't be around for as long as they've been around and they wouldn't have people buying their thousands of dollars speakers if they were just good looking
@@ryanschipp8513 it is so called high end / marketing. There are only few audiophiles buying so expensive equipment. The main group of buyers want something excellent looking. Ofcourse it must sound good, but for their untrained ears everything sounds better than what they are used to. Thats why everybody buys b&w and McIntosh eventhough there are always better alternatives for the price.
Not saying all the Focals are shait, but for their price are average or sub-par. Look at their subwoofers.. my 2c
These would be great for console gaming
Yes they are.
How these compete with m&K s300 setup?
These.
What is the price of this system?
No grille?
My cat say hi... 😻😻😻
I don't see any Perlisten Atmos speakers, they are coming or they're not interested on height speakers?
There's a pair of surround speakers in this video.
@SpareChange so those surround speakers will be Perlisten Atmos. At this moment no chance for Perlisten Atmos speakers.
Any speaker can be used for Atmos. You just have to mount it.
@@therealshanelee thanks for your feedback
Later in the year Perlisten will release some inceiling speakers
But were you can buy them?
google
Amazing . . .
Endgame speakers?! 😮
$34,500 for 5.1
That’s the real number that matters lol
Not exactly a good value. I bet they sound incredible.......but not a good value. I've got a 7.3 setup. $10000. Its a 10/10 in my room.
@David Mander David...??
Do you think she wants B&W c800 headphones
I want this please 🙏 🤩
Cost of them is ridiculous though. Not worth that much in my opinion. I could get bookshelves paired with separate sub each and be cheaper and much better.
Always run full range. In your set up I would set the rears to small (80hz crossover) and leave the fronts and centre on full range. For me I run my fronts with high level support from my Rel sub. Not that they need much!! Centre and Rears full range with no support.
Interesting. Can you expand on what it means to run high level support from your subs? How would one go about setting that up?
Greetings Green Lantern
...soon as i win the lottery...
Your new feature upgrade lol
Cool
40k for a 5.2. Ouch. Maybe if I win the lottery. Which I don’t play. 😆 So never.
Surrounds, are $3995….EACH? Yeah….no…not for me, anyway.
I need these speakers who wants to buy one of my kidneys
For most people, it costs a kidney per listen
What’s with the gloves ? Did u steal them with whisper 74 lol and how about sharing the spot light with the lady who’s holding the camera
Entire setup will be downpayment for the house!
Arendal on steroids lol
I think B&W is much stronger and clearer
Focal sopra looks way better than these perlisten, they are kind of ugly looking for the price
Maybe, but you'd be crazy not to go with whatever sounds best rather than choosing based on looks, especially for home theatre where you shouldn't even see the speakers.
@@rosstee I hear you I like looks and sound for me perlisten wouldn't make it in my house even if it sounds better than sopra , I will go for sonas Farber or Wilson Audio in that price range
No matter how good, these are some seriously overpriced speakers.
Seriously overpriced for who?
@@therealshanelee Honestly I think it doesn't matter how rich you are there comes a point when some prices don't make sense at all.
@@jm-vq4cm why does this price not make any sense. Have you used them in your home to make that assessment?
@@therealshanelee come on Shane, $3990 for a pair of surround speakers is a rip off
@@jm-vq4cm when you step up to a certain level of quality sound and build, you’ll get why it’s priced as such. There’s plenty folks that find the value in products at this level.