Видео

Excellent strategy differences and issues presentation for Boeing and Airbus. Let’s hope now that the commercial and operational launching of the a321 xlr will prove and tick the boxes for all its boasted capabilities promises . Crossing fingers and rendezvous as from 2025 year, representing a first full year of operations for an initial review between promises and the reality sanity checks outcome.

Canada also has the MRTT 🇨🇦

the airplanes are a differant size- The 767 is a solid airplane that can operate on smaller fields. The biggest issue is floating requirements and some system quirks that took a longtime to fix. THe a330 is bigger than the 767-200 but smaller than the 777. A cargo airplane or frieght transport doe not merge easily with the mission of a dedicated tanker. The marketing is comparing apples and oranges...

I have a simple solution. Pull all US military from Europe. Europe can protect itself. Europe has nothing the US needs. It's time for the US taxpayers to rebuild the US infrastructure.

Boeing or Airbus? No question: Buy the aircraft from the producer that pays you the highest pribes!

A330mrtt

IT DEPENDS ON THE CAPABILITIES OF BOEING AND AIRBUS ON THE DEMAND OF AIRPLANES AROUND THE WORLD. THAT'S WHY EMBRAER (THE BRAZIL PLANE MANUFACTURE) HAS THE CAPABILITIES OF FILLING THAT GAP. MEXICO HAS BOUGHT 10 new E195-E2 aircraft (with 132 seats each) and 10 new E190-E2 aircraft (with 108 seats each) - allowing the airline operated by the Defense Ministry (Sedena) to begin offering international destinations to customers. MEXICANA OF AVIATION WILL USE THEM.

The only reason the USAF doesn't have the A330 MRTT is that the "tender process" was rigged AF as usual! Corrupt decisions in the US Military are going a long way and have nothing to do with real decisions for the best product / solution! It will just go wilder under President DUMP! The Airbus is so far superiour that this is an absolute joke!

Brilliant aircraft.

There's no plane as 777- 9 yet and who knows if by 2030 will be...

No it wont ,thaåt plane is build 80% by western tech. Prehabs you should go as Russia, completely independent.

Personally, I'd go with the airbus

It's a right thing to do to be 101% independent. GOOD JOB WELL DONE ❤️❤️❤️✊🏻🕊🇷🇺🕊✊🏻❤️❤️❤️

all china air line bought it lol

Stop calling it carbon emissions, carbon is a solid, co2 is an extremely rare colourless and odourless trace gas that feeds all plant life.!

Whats the point !!!!! with starmer taxing the guts out of the UK there really is no one who could possibly afford to fly again, especially in any kind of RR engine based aircraft.

Boeing is not concerned about foreign sales.The U.S. govt will buy anything from them.

I think the USAF was very biased in the competition for the contract: Boeing was always going to win the contract. Now the USAF is paying for that bias. There still is no firm date for the upgraded RVS. Talking with boomer friends of mine, they were all opposed to the move up into the cockpit. To force the congressional hand, the USAF decided to divest the KC-10, claiming an increase in operating costs due to parts shortages. BS. There are bunches of DC-10's sitting in the deserts of the US that could have been bought and canned for parts. Always thought both airframes, the KC-46 and the MRTT should have been bought and developed. The MRTT would be best utilized in the Pacific with its increased range and capacity.

My verdict on which aircraft is better is simple: the MC-21. Why else would 'fair business practicing" European countries would refuse to certify it?

TG

Good

Customers need options. Competition is important for fair pricing and good customer service.

I think the KC46 is a better plane as the a330. The KC46 can transport more and bigger cargo than the a330. The KC46 can fly further with extra tanks inside or with aerial refueling. A lot of countries especially the ones having that fleet of 9 330's where purely focused on using something European. Like always with us eu countries. Instead of buying good stuff from the USA we have to develop something our selfs... The Dutch have the best radar of the whole eu but we still have to deal with German or frence stuff while Dutch and US stuff is far superior. Like with planesand boats the Dutch and US have much better planes or boats. But if you dont have connections our influence your going to be screwed with eu products crap😂

The 2 way to go: 1) fully electric vtol. 2) rocket like, license SpaceX from Elon, <45min any point of earth You don’t need wings, tail, so on.

Is comac even remotely becomes threat to Boeing and Airbus, same scenario as with Huawei is coming. I would rather bet on fully russian made planes.

When they push you to the wall, you will figure out the solution. That’s what happened to Russia that’s what happened to China. I hope Africa will take advantage what’s going on right now because this kind advantage will never come back again.

the Kc 46 is a Piece of Crap. the kc 10 was a better plane, even the A330mrtt is a way better plane, the KC 10 had a way better refueling system

COMAC using a majority of Airbus and Boeing parts. COMAC can be grounded if thee companies choose not to supply the parts.

Of course a nation will order according to it needs and one need for America is jobs....In my opinion, Boing has trust issues and maintance cost per operational hour, availabilitiy of spare parts and flexibillity, will be the deciding factor. Smaller air forces might not need a tanker everyday but more cargo capacity. Even not a dedicated cargo plane, the MRTT can reduce workload on smaller cargo fleets.

C939 is only for China market, why shock the world?

This is the most Airbus fanboy channel ever. You SUCK

Thank you for this road show in favour of Airbus. But since the German Wing desaster, which in fact wasn't a copilot error as the political gang wants to make as believe, I'm not so much convinced by AIrbus, Airbus technique and Airbus innovations. In one of the fist flights with an Airbus, I get seasick as the intervalls for the wing movement (up and down) was regulated too harsh in a too big intervall. As a passenger I'm not interested in a maximum of environment efficiency, I'm interested in the maximum of the flight safety. For me the dreamliner of Boeing integrating many features of the DC10 is nearly the perfect answer to todays demands: comfortable, fast and fuel-efficient!

1

Boeing has become pure evil and incompetent. We would know more but whistle blowers keep turning up "epsteined"

C939 Made in China🎉🎉🎉

❤💙🤍💯

We all know which is the better aircraft here. Unfortunately, that doesn’t really amount to much as the USAF orders for the KC-46 is more than double of “every nation’s” order of the A330MRTT. Unless the USAF ditches the KC-46 for the A330MRTT (something that’s not likely to happen at all) then “Bye,bye KC-46” just doesn’t seem accurate.

The 737 max shows Boeings willingness to cut corners

Hm w Polsce mamy silnik detonacyjno wirujący ,hipersoniczny, można montować od samolotów do dronow . Może być mały ,nawet dziesięć centymetrów . A prędkość powyżej 6 tysięcy.kilometrow na godzinę.. dron z AI ,hipersoniczny posiadający dedykowany mu radar to coś co powoduje różnice. Oszczędność w zużyciu paliwa powoduje jego duży zasięg.

I've been love to hear about every Airlines BEGS for the new AIRBUS A321xlr right now because, just like Garuda Indonesia's subsidiary Citilink love to ordering AIRBUS A321xlr for adding more plane for the future of developed country ever for Indonesia on 2045 years later.

1

YES RUSSIA

Good luck😂😅

The 757 replacement market was and is Boeing’s to lose. It’s too late for that now. And the 737-7 and -10 are rapidly fading as well. Southwest whose business model depends on the -7 might be forced to go with the A220. All the result of high payed piss poor management and board members.

Canada is buying 9 A330 MRTT.

Airbus

1

recycled article.

great video. thanks great america 🙂🙂🙂🙂

you say the efficiency improvement is 1% but in the text above you stated 15%? Are you messing these things up? 1% vs 15% ?????