Well , for a military Transporter the 26 t payload of the C-390 is relativly low , an MBT is a no go , usually about 40-70 t = way to heavy , and even an IFV may be to heavy , a German Puma IFV is 31,4 t and fully equipped a whopping 43 t . Heavy amored Vehicles in general may be be a Problem for a C 390 . For Troops or Supplies the C 390 is fine , it depends what you want to do with a C 390 . Thats why Germany uses the A400M , it has a payload up to 37 t (max) with a single Vehicle of 32 t (max) , just enough for a IFV Puma and its Crew + some Ammunition and Supplies . An MLRS ( Tracks ) has ( with rockets ) a weight 26 t and even if its inside the 26 t payload Limit i guess its to heavy for a single item , without eqipment and Ammunition an MLRS has 21 t , this should be possibel . On the other side , the A400M can transport an full eqipped MLRS + additional Rockets and supplies .
the c390 does the job of a c130, saying it is a no go for cargo because of the payload compared fo a400m is like saying a400m is a no go compared to c17... different equipment for different purpose. also the a400m cost 2 c390.
I have the feeling that were the US to buy this, they'd likely want to have some form of local production/license built aircraft factory. It's a good'un.
Even the AIRBUS A330 mrtt, AIRBUS A400m, AIRBUS fighter plane, AIRBUS Helicopter, HELI AKS, H225 M and Rafale's fighter plane that have "HUGE UPGRADE" can be shocked the Military industry as the same think like Embraer's "HUGE UPGRADE" on C-390 and the video as I already saw it yesterday from @FLIGAVIA about video title named "Every Nation Wants The AIRBUS A330 mrtt than BOEING KC-46" where that video make me deal it.
"Effective" for "who"? The fact is that it is faster, carries more cargo, flies higher, newer, more technological, more comfortable, cheaper both to purchase and to maintain than its competitors, in addition to being modular. Simply put: If a country needs a Freighter and an aerial refueler, it would need to purchase 2 aircraft. With the C-390 Millenium, 1 is enough with an "additional refueling kit". The same applies to the various missions, such as firefighting, air medical transport, search and rescue, VIP passengers, launching all types of pallets... Just 1 C-390 covers them all, just by changing the configurations. So, it is effective and extremely advantageous.
Embraer e seus produtos de excelência! Empresa fantástica.
Yep!
In reality, Embraer was born manufacturing military transport aircraft, the Bandeirante, which ended up having civilian use as well.
Brazilian Pride the C-390
😊😊
The best one, congrats EMB C390 ❤❤❤❤❤
The best and amazinge aircraft. Merry Christmas eveyone
Awesome. 👍🇺🇸💪🤙🙏🤝😊. I love this channel. Awesome Thank you. Merry Christmas to everyone.
Merry Christmas!
You see the "hard points" under the wings. Make it a flying fortress
I don't expect a KC-390 to compete with the C-17 ! But to compete & pass the C-130 & even the M-400 of Airbus is to certain extent an actual Reality❗
it's good!
Kc390 is the best
I agree. But what about the ❤ between the countries?
Well , for a military Transporter the 26 t payload of the C-390 is relativly low , an MBT is a no go , usually about 40-70 t = way to heavy , and even an IFV may be to heavy , a German Puma IFV is 31,4 t and fully equipped a whopping 43 t . Heavy amored Vehicles in general may be be a Problem for a C 390 . For Troops or Supplies the C 390 is fine , it depends what you want to do with a C 390 . Thats why Germany uses the A400M , it has a payload up to 37 t (max) with a single Vehicle of 32 t (max) , just enough for a IFV Puma and its Crew + some Ammunition and Supplies . An MLRS ( Tracks ) has ( with rockets ) a weight 26 t and even if its inside the 26 t payload Limit i guess its to heavy for a single item , without eqipment and Ammunition an MLRS has 21 t , this should be possibel . On the other side , the A400M can transport an full eqipped MLRS + additional Rockets and supplies .
Those countries have no intention of flying tanks anywhere.
the c390 does the job of a c130, saying it is a no go for cargo because of the payload compared fo a400m is like saying a400m is a no go compared to c17... different equipment for different purpose. also the a400m cost 2 c390.
You are right, different aircraft to different proposals. C-390 competitor is C-130 not A400M.
I have the feeling that were the US to buy this, they'd likely want to have some form of local production/license built aircraft factory. It's a good'un.
Yes.
never
Even the AIRBUS A330 mrtt, AIRBUS A400m, AIRBUS fighter plane, AIRBUS Helicopter, HELI AKS, H225 M and Rafale's fighter plane that have "HUGE UPGRADE" can be shocked the Military industry as the same think like Embraer's "HUGE UPGRADE" on C-390 and the video as I already saw it yesterday from @FLIGAVIA about video title named "Every Nation Wants The AIRBUS A330 mrtt than BOEING KC-46" where that video make me deal it.
You're mentioning a lot of cool planes that we should do in the next videos. Thanks a lot!
Your Welcome @FLIGAVIA !
85 million does not seem to be cost effective....
"Effective" for "who"?
The fact is that it is faster, carries more cargo, flies higher, newer, more technological, more comfortable, cheaper both to purchase and to maintain than its competitors, in addition to being modular.
Simply put: If a country needs a Freighter and an aerial refueler, it would need to purchase 2 aircraft. With the C-390 Millenium, 1 is enough with an "additional refueling kit".
The same applies to the various missions, such as firefighting, air medical transport, search and rescue, VIP passengers, launching all types of pallets... Just 1 C-390 covers them all, just by changing the configurations.
So, it is effective and extremely advantageous.
Essa maravilha tecnológica é resultado de uma decisão política de investir no projeto feita pelo Presidente Lula.
Obrigado por passar vergonha aqui.
A decisão foi exclusiva da FAB com verba própria.
Decisão técnica; e não politica.
Não mano... foi um resultado da FAB e EMBRAER.
Não vem falar do inepto aqui, não.
😂😂😂😂 spam
@@wallacemjr verba própria não, colega, os U$ 2,00 bilhões investidos no projeto vieram dos pagadores de impostos brasileiros.