Interestingly, there may be one airline that might express interest in the Embraer E195-E2: Southwest Airlines. Reason: the continuing delays in certification of the 737-7 (neé 737 MAX 7). The E195-E2 could fly many Southwest routes now assigned to the 737-700.
IF Boeing cannot get the 737MAX7 off the ground and IF the activist investors can get some leverage at Southwest THEN perhaps Southwest can replace the smaller 737s in their fleet with the 195-E2. The 737 will not be around forever and Embraer is motivated to make sales. Perfect storm.
2x2 seating will always be superior in terms of passenger comfort. At any given point, you'd only get/need to touch *one* other person's arm/elbow. They are plentiful in Europe, but I'm still surprised they are not *more* common and utilized. I do know that KLM (Cityhopper) has a tendency to rough land when flying E-jets, but still, if given the option choice, I'd much rather be in a E175/E190 over other 3/4-seater planes or turboprops. I think Embraer is leaving a piece of the market on the table by not thinking/working on a ''LR'' version of their jets; I think it could be a (niche) hit!
Please forgive me, but you are completely missing the economic side of the debate. The Embraer is a great aircraft without much debate. However, look at the bigger problem. To take this to an extreme, it is a debate about the efficiencies of trains, or buses versus small sedan cars. Combine the efficiencies with the load capacity (traffic jam) of big city airports. In short they already need to limit the number of aircraft operations they can perform today. Limiting a major airport to only smaller aircraft is simply not feasible economically, Let us dive deeper into operations. Let us say their are 100 passengers that want to travel from small city A to small city B. Perhaps this is economical for the specific route with an Embraer, but certainly not on a Boeing 777. If 10 passengers actually want to travel between continents they must travel through larger airports (hubs). If you remove the other 90 passengers by flying direct between small cities the leftover 10 passengers are not economical to travel to the big hub for connections let alone across the globe. This is a huge and complex scheduling, or planning decision for airlines. You have a limited number of operations allowed in a big city yet can’t fill the large aircraft capable of actually making the flight from small cities. It is an extremely complex equations and I have only touched on 1, or 2 out of a hundred variables. Thank you for the video.
This is not perfectly fit for Delta Airlines, United Airlines and American Airlines in reason why they said "NO" to Embraer E2. Until, Delta Airlines, United Airlines and American Airlines cancel it Embraer E2 as they already says "NO".
Interestingly, there may be one airline that might express interest in the Embraer E195-E2: Southwest Airlines. Reason: the continuing delays in certification of the 737-7 (neé 737 MAX 7). The E195-E2 could fly many Southwest routes now assigned to the 737-700.
@@Sacto1654 why when they can buy 737-700 used with low cycles for 2 million dollars. The 737-700 was dumped by many airlines.
The E175-E2 is the variation developed specially for the US market, It only needs the scope clauses to be changed.
You got the target!
Embraer is in a very comfortable situation around the world. This is anti-embraer propaganda.
Question: Can Embraer deliver on schedule?
IF Boeing cannot get the 737MAX7 off the ground and IF the activist investors can get some leverage at Southwest THEN perhaps Southwest can replace the smaller 737s in their fleet with the 195-E2. The 737 will not be around forever and Embraer is motivated to make sales. Perfect storm.
2x2 seating will always be superior in terms of passenger comfort. At any given point, you'd only get/need to touch *one* other person's arm/elbow. They are plentiful in Europe, but I'm still surprised they are not *more* common and utilized. I do know that KLM (Cityhopper) has a tendency to rough land when flying E-jets, but still, if given the option choice, I'd much rather be in a E175/E190 over other 3/4-seater planes or turboprops. I think Embraer is leaving a piece of the market on the table by not thinking/working on a ''LR'' version of their jets; I think it could be a (niche) hit!
Please forgive me, but you are completely missing the economic side of the debate. The Embraer is a great aircraft without much debate. However, look at the bigger problem. To take this to an extreme, it is a debate about the efficiencies of trains, or buses versus small sedan cars. Combine the efficiencies with the load capacity (traffic jam) of big city airports. In short they already need to limit the number of aircraft operations they can perform today. Limiting a major airport to only smaller aircraft is simply not feasible economically,
Let us dive deeper into operations. Let us say their are 100 passengers that want to travel from small city A to small city B. Perhaps this is economical for the specific route with an Embraer, but certainly not on a Boeing 777. If 10 passengers actually want to travel between continents they must travel through larger airports (hubs). If you remove the other 90 passengers by flying direct between small cities the leftover 10 passengers are not economical to travel to the big hub for connections let alone across the globe.
This is a huge and complex scheduling, or planning decision for airlines. You have a limited number of operations allowed in a big city yet can’t fill the large aircraft capable of actually making the flight from small cities. It is an extremely complex equations and I have only touched on 1, or 2 out of a hundred variables.
Thank you for the video.
This is not perfectly fit for Delta Airlines, United Airlines and American Airlines in reason why they said "NO" to Embraer E2. Until, Delta Airlines, United Airlines and American Airlines cancel it Embraer E2 as they already says "NO".
Both Delta and American Airlines own and operate these aircraft. You tell all kinds of lies. Do everyone a favor and go out of business.
Wrong. They operate the E1 jets.
Boeing Sucks 😂
Eventual fleet replacement will be needed