Okay I watched other lens videos and I just ultimately love your video all around. The backdrop is easy to look at it makes me focus on you what you’re saying and the products you’re holding. I like that you physically hold the lenses and you’re not just standing outside talking about these things. I don’t have to put your words to an imaginary image, which is exceptionally hard when I’m new to photography and have no reference to make. So with that Thankyou! Keep creating!
Actually the Tamron 17-70 is an equivalent 25-105 lens, you have the same field of view range you would have with the Canon in a full-frame body, but with a f2.8 aperture, which is awesome!
Debating on the Sony 55-200 OSS vs a vintage Minolta APO 100-300 for my a6000. Primarily for nature and animal photography. The main question is do chose OSS or better but older glass?
Great video .... !!! .. question .. where can I purchase the lens adaptor? I looked for the information, but it is not there .. thanks in advance ... keep the good work
Cameras and lenses which everybody "had to have" five years or more ago have lost half to two-thirds (or more) of their value. I just picked up a sony 85-210mm for just over $100. And a Sony NEX 3 (with 18-55mm lens) for the same amount. So about 1/4 of what the package would have cost new "back in the day."
Loved this video thank you. I want to purchase the 18-35mm, 1.8...looking at used gear on mpb, they have the lens but for an EF-S mount. I assume I cannot use the mount you recommended? New to photography, appreciate your help! I don't want to purchase the wrong item :)
if you wanna try out a really nice vintage 50mm i highly suggest you to get yourself a nikon 50mm f2 ai. its also fully manual, its really sharp, and it has such an amazing bokeh, its really special on that one. prob. my fav. 50mm lens period and you can get it for like 50 bucks used market aswell
Great video and very helpful too Yesterday got the 55-210mm and 5 other lenses and lots of accessories (filters,tripods,flash guns ect ) with a Sony a6000 and nex-5n for £50 I can’t wait to use them
I'd recommend the 18-105mm as A you're getting more focal range B you're getting better auto focus as it's designed for mirrorless focusing which is handled completely differently to dslr and also auto focus in video C the 18-105mm is 1st party lens so you get profile corrections in video which is useful on this lens. Also you're stabilisation will be better especially when used with ibis or active stabilisation D you get PZ which for video it's good if you need it E it's designed for APSC/Super 35 so you'll get better sharpness most likely watch Tony northrup's video 'Should you use Full Frame Lenses on Crop Bodies? Yes and no...' F also the price of the 18-105mm is significantly less
@@keaganvandemerwe878 yeah i was also kinda curious as I owned the 18-105 but its not mentioned in this video. Use wise is a nice do it all lens although lately I’ve been using the sigma 30mm 1.4 more as the image sharpness is way better. Now that sigma released the 18-50 2.8 makes me want to get it just for that sigma sharpness goodness.
@@kensutanza The 18-50 is a great lens for the e-mount apsc community giving them an affordable standard zoom kit lens replacement. I still prefer the Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 because of the extra range on either end and the image stabilisation but I understand not everyone is going to be happy with its size and weight like I am not to mention the added cost
@@keaganvandemerwe878 does the 17-70 vc helps a lot with stabilization or was it just a little bit? Yeah with the added cost its just wasnt worth getting if you already have the 18-105, basically just 1mm increase on the wider end and +1 stop of light (with the 2.8). I wish the 18-105 would be a 2.8 and it would be perfect.
@@kensutanza absolutely I find It makes a huge difference on the a6400 especially I can shoot at 70mm with a shutter speed of 1/40 easily and still get some sharp shots at 1/25
@@zaymax_7 you can't get a speed booster for the Tamron it's a native lens that's not how it works. Not that you need one I love my tamron and it almost never comes of my a6400. It's also a great lens for the fs5/fs7 especially as it has optical stabilisation
@@keaganvandemerwe878 oh yea i forgot. Got too used to thinking of the original simga/tamron 17-50 and 17-70 dslr lenses. I completely agree tho the 17-70 is a much much better choice than the canon. native and more reliable. also more modern in most aspects
@@zaymax_7 no worries tamron sigma also made a 17-70 2.8-4 for ef that probably confused you. The Tamron has incredibly good auto focus is insanely sharp and gives you a 25.5-105 f4.2 equivalent when used of apsc/s35
Within the first minute of the video you're requesting multiple times to 'watch the entire video'. To me, this is a clear sign that watching your content is most probably a waste of time. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'll skip the rest now.
Nah man, none of these works for me. A tamron 17-70mm f2.8 is the most versatile lens i've ever seen! It's 700$, so a bot pricy but still better than 24-105 / 18-50 anyday. I don't know why, most of the don't know about this lens!
![Get SHARP videos on SONY Alpha [a6000 Settings, Lenses, Export Settings]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Nh1euJjlxO0/mqdefault.jpg)
Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/essentials-preset-pack
I bought the 55-210mm for planespotting. I love it.
Okay I watched other lens videos and I just ultimately love your video all around. The backdrop is easy to look at it makes me focus on you what you’re saying and the products you’re holding. I like that you physically hold the lenses and you’re not just standing outside talking about these things. I don’t have to put your words to an imaginary image, which is exceptionally hard when I’m new to photography and have no reference to make.
So with that Thankyou! Keep creating!
Rename the video title to " for Canon shooters "
I might suggest switching the Canon for Tamron 17-70? Not quite the same on the top end but its f2.8 constant. Great video
As some one who owns the Tamron and uses it with a a6400 every week for video shoots I agree
Actually the Tamron 17-70 is an equivalent 25-105 lens, you have the same field of view range you would have with the Canon in a full-frame body, but with a f2.8 aperture, which is awesome!
@@MatheusPratta It's more like 25-105 f4 full frame equivalent
what would be the most you'd pay for this lens? I'm seeing amazon with prices at $800!!
The Sony 55-210 is a massive upgrade to the kit lens the a6000 came with.
Which lens is the best for wedding fotography of couples with the alpha a6000?
Out of these lenses, which one is the best for recording outdoors/nature?
Debating on the Sony 55-200 OSS vs a vintage Minolta APO 100-300 for my a6000.
Primarily for nature and animal photography. The main question is do chose OSS or better but older glass?
Hi, thank you for the video. Do you think the sigma 16mm would be good for real estate photography?
awesome video really helped me out deciding what i should get
Great video .... !!! .. question .. where can I purchase the lens adaptor? I looked for the information, but it is not there .. thanks in advance ... keep the good work
So from these which one would be better for nature photos?
Which would be the best lense for sporting events ?
How do you know if a lens is good ?
Larger optics=better lens.
I don't have lens, don't have camera, iam not a photographer or videographer but still I watch your videos..
This was so incredibly helpful thank you 🙏
Loved your video! And easy to watch through the whole way ❤
Cameras and lenses which everybody "had to have" five years or more ago have lost half to two-thirds (or more) of their value. I just picked up a sony 85-210mm for just over $100. And a Sony NEX 3 (with 18-55mm lens) for the same amount. So about 1/4 of what the package would have cost new "back in the day."
would you recommend buying the 85-210 mm lens?
I'm missing the Blaccscent. Can we bring it back in twenty-twenty-fo?
Is there a point to a weather sealed lens if the mount isn't?
great video, didn't realize i could adapt my 18-35 to sony.
Loved this video thank you. I want to purchase the 18-35mm, 1.8...looking at used gear on mpb, they have the lens but for an EF-S mount. I assume I cannot use the mount you recommended? New to photography, appreciate your help! I don't want to purchase the wrong item :)
Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM ART - Canon EF-S Fit (this is how it is listed on mpb)
Hi! what lens recommend for products ? Thanks :)
50 mm
Hey bro I need some help with finding a good microphone for my Sony A6000
Great video thank you
if you wanna try out a really nice vintage 50mm i highly suggest you to get yourself a nikon 50mm f2 ai. its also fully manual, its really sharp, and it has such an amazing bokeh, its really special on that one. prob. my fav. 50mm lens period and you can get it for like 50 bucks used market aswell
Can you use these lenses in Sony A 6300?
Yes, every sony a6x00 series has equal lens mount
Anyone have any idea what the best camera would be for gym photoshoots?
Great video and very helpful too
Yesterday got the 55-210mm and 5 other lenses and lots of accessories (filters,tripods,flash guns ect ) with a Sony a6000 and nex-5n for £50
I can’t wait to use them
subtle flex ok bro
@@The_Horizonmost random ass place to see you, you buying a new lens?
@@LuaCynthia ye
What would be a good lens for the a6000 for doing car photography? Planning on doing static shots as well as rolling shots.
exactly my question too 😂
@@cmphxtography I think im leaning toward the sigma 30mm 1.4...it can be bought for around $200 on mpb
@@joebeck0 yeah seems good. I think I'm going to get the Sony 50mm 1.8
@@cmphxtography i've seen that one as well. just keep in mind the crop factor the a6000 has.
@@joebeck0 yeah that's what I was thinking. I'll do some more research
Where’s the link for the adapter??
Sigma MC-11 Mount Converter/Lens Adapter (Sigma//Canon EF-Mount Lenses to Sony E)
And in parallel, this is the top 5 lenses for sony nex 😁
Comparing the Canon 24-105mm to sony 18-105mm, which do you think are better as both have constant F4?
I'd recommend the 18-105mm as A you're getting more focal range B you're getting better auto focus as it's designed for mirrorless focusing which is handled completely differently to dslr and also auto focus in video C the 18-105mm is 1st party lens so you get profile corrections in video which is useful on this lens. Also you're stabilisation will be better especially when used with ibis or active stabilisation D you get PZ which for video it's good if you need it E it's designed for APSC/Super 35 so you'll get better sharpness most likely watch Tony northrup's video 'Should you use Full Frame Lenses on Crop Bodies? Yes and no...' F also the price of the 18-105mm is significantly less
@@keaganvandemerwe878 yeah i was also kinda curious as I owned the 18-105 but its not mentioned in this video. Use wise is a nice do it all lens although lately I’ve been using the sigma 30mm 1.4 more as the image sharpness is way better. Now that sigma released the 18-50 2.8 makes me want to get it just for that sigma sharpness goodness.
@@kensutanza The 18-50 is a great lens for the e-mount apsc community giving them an affordable standard zoom kit lens replacement. I still prefer the Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 because of the extra range on either end and the image stabilisation but I understand not everyone is going to be happy with its size and weight like I am not to mention the added cost
@@keaganvandemerwe878 does the 17-70 vc helps a lot with stabilization or was it just a little bit? Yeah with the added cost its just wasnt worth getting if you already have the 18-105, basically just 1mm increase on the wider end and +1 stop of light (with the 2.8). I wish the 18-105 would be a 2.8 and it would be perfect.
@@kensutanza absolutely I find It makes a huge difference on the a6400 especially I can shoot at 70mm with a shutter speed of 1/40 easily and still get some sharp shots at 1/25
Bumping up iso on digital cameras not the same loss of clarity like old film cameras. I hear this a lot but one 1000 would be difficult to see.
What’s the best/cheap lens for the A6000 specifically for Astrophotography, I plan to take both wide milky way shots and up close nebula/galaxy shots.
definitely 200mm lens
Rokinon RK12M-E 12mm F2.0
Do you know if this mount would work for a Canon 16-35mm? I have a Sony a6000.
Thank you
soviet lens helios 44-2 or 3 or 4 or 7 - 15$
you probably have one now but need a fill light
I'd personally swap out the Canon 24-105mm for the Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 especially if you use the Canon with a speedbooster
the tamron is an apsc lens. it'll have super strong vignetting on a speedbooster
@@zaymax_7 you can't get a speed booster for the Tamron it's a native lens that's not how it works. Not that you need one I love my tamron and it almost never comes of my a6400. It's also a great lens for the fs5/fs7 especially as it has optical stabilisation
@@keaganvandemerwe878 oh yea i forgot. Got too used to thinking of the original simga/tamron 17-50 and 17-70 dslr lenses. I completely agree tho the 17-70 is a much much better choice than the canon. native and more reliable. also more modern in most aspects
@@zaymax_7 no worries tamron sigma also made a 17-70 2.8-4 for ef that probably confused you. The Tamron has incredibly good auto focus is insanely sharp and gives you a 25.5-105 f4.2 equivalent when used of apsc/s35
It was 4d chess move. He went easy to make feel like she can debate him and agree to another debate
Within the first minute of the video you're requesting multiple times to 'watch the entire video'. To me, this is a clear sign that watching your content is most probably a waste of time. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'll skip the rest now.
or you could just shoot canon?
Nah man, none of these works for me.
A tamron 17-70mm f2.8 is the most versatile lens i've ever seen! It's 700$, so a bot pricy but still better than 24-105 / 18-50 anyday. I don't know why, most of the don't know about this lens!
so the best lenses for SONY a6000 are CANON lenses? Unfortunately, this is not what I was looking for.
I own the Sigma 16-1.4 and it's awesome.
Explaining too fast, good info too
55-210? really?
"Like I said"
"However"
"So"
You need to avoid these and other filler words/phrases. It's extremely distracting.
Otherwise, thanks for the info.
Slow down! You spoke too fast. Watch a newscaster and listen to his pace.
First. Also love your videos and would love to help on any projects. You should make a discord, contact if you need help to make it.