And it definitely has many advantages over the Sony AX53. What I have found is they actually work pretty good together - the G50 as my A Cam and the AX53 as my B Cam. This is not to say the AX53 is lesser of a camera at all, it just is easier as a setup and hit record type camera than the G50, which while in manual mode gives you a lot more control over your shot. In the end I have decided I love both cameras and am glad I purchased them. Is the G50 the better of the two? I would say that definitely depends on the camera operator more than the camera itself. For me, I’ll put the G50 ahead of the AX53 and feel very good about my decision.
man I tell ya, both of these cameras are REALLY close! great video you did here. Just goes to show you all of the hype behind Sony cameras because while the AX-53 is a good camera, it doesn't blow the G50 out of the water by any means!
Thank you very much. I agree wholeheartedly. The G50 can do almost everything as good or better than the AX53, but there are times where it is just plain easier to grab the AX53 and just get “the shot”. While, I do like the Auto Mode of the G50, that is not why I bought it. The Manual Mode is definitely the feature I think that sets the G50 apart from the AX53 the most. There are other features, but Manual Mode has to be the biggest one.
@@BrianBuckalew I know exactly where you're coming from. I have the Sony CX455 and the Canon Vixia HF R800 and the biggest thing that separates the R800 from the CX455 is the superior manual mode
Excellent choice. You will be very pleased. I have several videos where I take the G50 through its paces - both indoors and outdoors. On a tripod, on a gimble, and hand-held as well. Wishing you all the best!!!
@@BrianBuckalewI've read most of your responses to the comments, your explanations are clear and you know what you're talking about, you understand the subject, thank you very much, if you have some free time, please watch my latest video with the G50,(I refer to the videos I make from shore as there are others with drone) the previous ones were with a nikon D5000 with a 70/300mm lens, my best wishes, greetings from Brazil.
Have you had the chance to try the new Canon Vixia HF G70? It looks like it has the same sensor size as the G50, so I expect similar image quality. Do you know of the G70 is much of an upgrade over the G50? Or is the 6yr old AX53 still highly competitive vs the G70?
I have not had a chance to try the G70 and doubt I will - and here is the reason why: it does not have dual pixel auto focus (DPAF) which is a deal breaker for me based on my experience with the G50, therefore I cannot recommend this camcorder. That is lot to say you won’t find it to be an amazing camera for your needs, it is just that for me I have found without Canon’s DPAF it makes it almost impossible to keep an image in focus or keep the camcorder from focus-hunting in the middle of a shot. For me that makes the footage unusable. The best advice I can give is to rent one for a week from websites like lensrentals.com or a local camera store and see if it serves your purpose(s).
And it is, Paul. The results of my weeks worth of tests have really convinced me in the right setting and situation, it is a really great camcorder. Certainly a very strong B Camera. Thanks for watching and leaving your comment.
Good test. On canon, you can twist the contrast to a minimum, it will become better in terms of dynamic range, overexposure and shadows. Do you have another video camera in the background, was this new G50 already matched with it?
Thank you - the camera in the back is my old "A" camera - a Sony HDR-FX7. I have not matched it with the FX7 as I am looking for a 4K camera to replace it with. The idea would be to have two 4K cameras to use together in my studio shots, but I really am not sure the G50 is going to be what I need it to be. I have a more recent video that I posted today if you are at all interested.
@@BrianBuckalew I watched your new video. Unfortunately, I don’t know English, I’m writing now through a translator. Why didn't the G50 suit you? in your low light conditions, the G50's picture is noticeably brighter and sharper than the ax53. Only the contrast of the picture is too high, but this is adjustable, maybe lower the contrast right in the camera and remove a little sharp and it will be even better, although she did a good job in my opinion with these settings too
I will be posting yet another video today that shows an aberration I noticed that has me concerned. I will let the footage speak of itself. Thank you for commenting back and giving your input. It is greatly valued.
Hey Brian....even though the video seemed unprepared yet I understand how difficult it is to make scripts..shoot and upload videos. Best Wishes Buddy.....keep doing videos.
Thank you very much for watching and leaving your comment. That’s really my style. I don’t want to make videos that are over-edited or rehearsed. I prefer a more “real” video that shows a natural approach to delivering the content I want to share. I think it makes me come off as more genuine and easier to relate to. I certainly understand the benefit of scripting out segments and I’m just not into that approach.
It depends on where you live. This link will tell you which format works in which region of the world. Find your region and determine if PAL (LEGRIA) or NTSC (VIXIA) is what you need: cac.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2017-01-31_NTSC-PAL-Format_Definitions-and-Countries.pdf
Another great question! The Canon VIXIA HF G50 has the slightly bigger sensor and with the manual controls really allows for you to dial in for whatever the shot calls for (within the capabilities of the camera that is). It can open up to F1.8 where the Sony goes to F2.0, so another advantage for the Canon. So, based on the specs and on my tests, the Canon was better in low-light than the AX-53.
@@BrianBuckalew excellent response brother. Thank you. I had a xa11 and bought a "R" but for hunting a DSLR is just to much. I'll stay canon and try to pick one up asap.
I appreciate what you are doing and it is a good, useful comparison for me in the end. But it would be nice if you sweated the production a bit more. About half of the video is explaining why you had to reshoot parts of it due to the Sony being given a custom WB and the Canon going full auto. The belch is wonderful, eh? All of this can be made to disappear with movie magic by re-filming the correct portions and leaving out any mention that it was ever a problem. I get that there is a certain attraction to the videos being made in a low-key manner, but even then it is nice to set and maintain standards for your presentation.
Sony AX53. You can just turn it on and hit record. Controlling the shutter speed to double your frame rate and you are all set. Almost guaranteed to get the shot every time.
A fully charged battery will normally say 170-190 min when first put in. Now, regardless of how long the battery lasts I recommend ALWAYS purchasing at least two spare batteries for every camera you own.
Sorry for the 101 question here, but at 0:12, could you explain how you have the external mic connected to the G50? I'm replacing a Canon HV20 mini dv which was great for my needs but just can't deal with tape + other issues anymore. I started the search with the Canon R800 but since that doesn't have a shoe for external accessories (I have an AT-822 external mic), I saw a step up would be the Panasonic HC-V770. But I got some room to push that so seeing what's in the next tier. Both the G50 and the Ax53 you've covered in this video are tempting, but really pushing my range. But I may just do one of them, and this video + comments are making me lean towards the G50
Alright since I've posted this comment, I've gone ahead and ordered an AX53. Amazon Warehouse had a complete AX53 w/ the only issue being slight damage to box only AX53 for $760, almost $350 off retail. The best open box/refurbished prices I was seeing on the G50 were around $900. As I mentioned in my earlier comment, I actually was a bit more drawn to the G50 after watching your video and reading all the comments. The G50 did seem to have the better picture *but* I know you did it with a lot of manual settings adjustment and I don't really have that expertise. So I'm not sure I could even get there w/ the camera. Plus, it seems the AX53's stabilization is really something. I mainly do tripod shots but do have to do handheld sometimes so good to know I have that to take advantage of. That said, since I am still within the return window of the AX53. I am watching an ebay auction with a G50 and a lot of other filmmaking add ons: Rode VideoMic Pro Shotgun microphone, SanDisk Extreme Pro 128GB SD card, UURig Top handle with cold shoe mount, BM Dual Charger and batteries, Libec ZC-LP LANC Zoom Control. I may throw my hat into the ring depending on how high the price gets. That said I'm not totally comfortable buying something without the ability to return, take advantage of warranty, etc.
If you are doing a lot of shots where you don’t need full manual control of your camera then the AX53 is the perfect camera for you. It will get most shots with very little need to do anything out but record. It just lacks some of the control you might want to have in less-than-optimal shooting conditions. But with a good set of video lights you will be able to get a decent shot anyway.
I’m sorry, I do not. I actually use several cheap options in various sizes. I tend to like Neewer brand and I have a couple styles of those. My actual studio light kit is a LimoStudio video light kit which came with two lights; stands w/diffusers; green, black and white cloth backdrops; and a collapsible stand for the backdrops. I use the LimoStudio light kit on just about every video I make - usually just a single light is all I need.
In all honesty, Boris, if it is just between these two camcorders I am picking the Sony FDR-AX53 because it is mostly auto and will allow you to just run-and-gun. Now, the G50 has an auto mode as well, but the camera is better in manual mode and depending on your capabilities as a videographer you may prefer more auto functionality and less manual. That is going to depend on your preferences as a camera operator. But if you were leaning towards Canon and had a little more $$$ to spend then I would recommend the Canon VIXIA HF G60 which has a 1” CMOS sensor and dual pixel autofocus. That is a superior camera to both of these and will give you better results for capturing fast-moving objects. I have a handful of videos on my channel where I compare the G60 to both the G50 and AX53.
The AX53 is a great camcorder. Trust me - there are plenty of situations where I will reach for the AX53 over the G50, but in the end the manual mode on the G50 and the ability to record 10-bit 4.2.2 out of the HDMI port make it a more professional-grade camcorder.
@@BrianBuckalew Thank you SO much for your reply. I been going crazy for weeks now trying to find the right camcorder for my podcast. I've narrowed it down to the Sony FDR-AX53, Panasonic HC-VX51, Canon G50 and Canon G60. Still having trouble deciding, but it sounds like you prefer the G60, correct? If not, the G50 from what I read in all your other replies.
G60 has the 1” sensor - you can’t beat that, but it costs upwards of $1,600.00 and I can’t afford that right now. I will eventually own a G60, just have to sell a couple items first. Lol. If you are doing a podcast and have a budget around $1,000.00-range, you can’t go wrong with either the AX53 or the G50. The G50 does have the larger sensor and has manual mode - but manual mode may not be important to you. The G50 also is larger and feels better built. It you hold the AX53 in one hand and the G50 in the other you will notice how much better built the G50 is. But there is absolutely nothing wrong with the AX53. I would be fine with it if that was my only camcorder. I really mean that. In the end you have to ask yourself what features are most important to you.
I bought a G60 - the big brother to the G50. I also still own the AX53 for its simplistic approach. You can just turn it on and get the shot. So, I have a quick shot camera (AX53) and a more complex manual camera that allows me to get the shot the way I want it for more advanced type of shoots (G60). They are used for completely different types of videos.
The difference in the color rendition is big! Sony is warmer (although it normally tends to be cooler than other cameras), but sharpness is terrible, why is that? Normally the AX-53 performs better.
No, sir. The FDR-AX53 is in perfect condition and is still being used almost every time I make a studio video. There are differences between these two cameras, that is for sure. I will say the way it is being used in this video is not the AX53’s strong suit. I have other videos that prove this. The AX53 is a fine camcorder and does some things very well. Low-light shots definitely are not one of them, or even a fairly lit room like in this video.
Hi Brian, Thanks for the reviews. Looking to replace 2020 sony cx675 $600. 1080p 6 lux BOSS gimbel stabilization. I was looking at left over g50 until I saw your vid. Did you have in dynamic or is camera defective ? See this other vid that looks good in dynamic. ruclips.net/video/IveZaT8qiQU/видео.html Current available are Cx 405 6 lux NO BOSS or AX 53 with BOSS Gimble but 9 lux 4k, 6 lux 1080p. So same poor low light as cx405 & cx675. Low light examples ruclips.net/video/TleMTjzSCNM/видео.html So did you have g70 in dynamic or is camera defective ? Have you done review on cx405 1/5.8 vs g50 1/2.3 vs g60 1/1 vs g70 1/2.3 vs ax53 1/2.5 ? G70 10/22 updated g50 with bigger screen and double dots. Thank again for reviews.
No, G50 was not defective - it was brand new. I would blame me more than a camera. I used all of the stabilization modes to try and see which one worked best. I did not have a G70, only G50, G60, and now XF400 (best of all). All other items you mentioned I have never owned. Just AX53 along with the three Canon models I just mentioned.
My apologies - I am not sure exactly what you are asking, but Google Translate provided this: "how did you teach ax53 to shoot so badly?". If this is what you were asking I am not sure what to really say. The results of this video speak for themselves. I do stand by my comments that the G50 is a better overall camera than the Sony FDR-AX53.
The lighting is the same in every shot. What I mean is, although I change camera locations, the two camcorders are dealing with the exact same lighting setups in each shot.
Hello Kizarat. I can't say they all do - this is literally the only Canon camcorder I have ever owned. Now, I do own a Canon DSLR and a Canon mirrorless camera and the color on both of those is fabulous. I would have to look at footage from other Canon camcorders to see if what you are saying is accurate. Also, I do like the color off of the G50, especially outdoors in proper sunlight. I think the colors pop quite nicely when I take this G50 outside with a clear sky providing some decent light. Indoors I just have never been able to get good quality in my home studio, so I apologize for my footage here.
Unless there’s something I’m missing the Canon looks so much crisper, wow.
And it definitely has many advantages over the Sony AX53. What I have found is they actually work pretty good together - the G50 as my A Cam and the AX53 as my B Cam. This is not to say the AX53 is lesser of a camera at all, it just is easier as a setup and hit record type camera than the G50, which while in manual mode gives you a lot more control over your shot. In the end I have decided I love both cameras and am glad I purchased them.
Is the G50 the better of the two? I would say that definitely depends on the camera operator more than the camera itself. For me, I’ll put the G50 ahead of the AX53 and feel very good about my decision.
@@BrianBuckalew Makes perfect sense, many thanks for the additional feedback.
Absolutely. And thank you for watching and taking the time to leave a comment. Hope you are well and stay safe.
man I tell ya, both of these cameras are REALLY close! great video you did here. Just goes to show you all of the hype behind Sony cameras because while the AX-53 is a good camera, it doesn't blow the G50 out of the water by any means!
Thank you very much. I agree wholeheartedly. The G50 can do almost everything as good or better than the AX53, but there are times where it is just plain easier to grab the AX53 and just get “the shot”. While, I do like the Auto Mode of the G50, that is not why I bought it. The Manual Mode is definitely the feature I think that sets the G50 apart from the AX53 the most. There are other features, but Manual Mode has to be the biggest one.
@@BrianBuckalew I know exactly where you're coming from. I have the Sony CX455 and the Canon Vixia HF R800 and the biggest thing that separates the R800 from the CX455 is the superior manual mode
Thanks for the help Brian! I'm gonna head over to best buy and pick up the G50 today, seems like it should be perfect for what I'm trying to do.
Awesome!!! Let me know how you make out with it.
Thank you mate, I bought a G50, greetings from Brazil.
Excellent choice. You will be very pleased. I have several videos where I take the G50 through its paces - both indoors and outdoors. On a tripod, on a gimble, and hand-held as well. Wishing you all the best!!!
@@BrianBuckalewI've read most of your responses to the comments, your explanations are clear and you know what you're talking about, you understand the subject, thank you very much, if you have some free time, please watch my latest video with the G50,(I refer to the videos I make from shore as there are others with drone) the previous ones were with a nikon D5000 with a 70/300mm lens, my best wishes, greetings from Brazil.
Is it this one…SHIPS IN MOTION, SANTOS PORT SHIPSPOTTING #192?
Which one would you recommend for capturing family moments?
Have you had the chance to try the new Canon Vixia HF G70? It looks like it has the same sensor size as the G50, so I expect similar image quality.
Do you know of the G70 is much of an upgrade over the G50? Or is the 6yr old AX53 still highly competitive vs the G70?
I have not had a chance to try the G70 and doubt I will - and here is the reason why: it does not have dual pixel auto focus (DPAF) which is a deal breaker for me based on my experience with the G50, therefore I cannot recommend this camcorder. That is lot to say you won’t find it to be an amazing camera for your needs, it is just that for me I have found without Canon’s DPAF it makes it almost impossible to keep an image in focus or keep the camcorder from focus-hunting in the middle of a shot. For me that makes the footage unusable. The best advice I can give is to rent one for a week from websites like lensrentals.com or a local camera store and see if it serves your purpose(s).
The Canon G50 looks very good.
And it is, Paul. The results of my weeks worth of tests have really convinced me in the right setting and situation, it is a really great camcorder. Certainly a very strong B Camera. Thanks for watching and leaving your comment.
Ow man, something is going wrong with sony at 4:46 - bad resolution =(
Good test. On canon, you can twist the contrast to a minimum, it will become better in terms of dynamic range, overexposure and shadows. Do you have another video camera in the background, was this new G50 already matched with it?
Thank you - the camera in the back is my old "A" camera - a Sony HDR-FX7. I have not matched it with the FX7 as I am looking for a 4K camera to replace it with. The idea would be to have two 4K cameras to use together in my studio shots, but I really am not sure the G50 is going to be what I need it to be. I have a more recent video that I posted today if you are at all interested.
@@BrianBuckalew I watched your new video. Unfortunately, I don’t know English, I’m writing now through a translator. Why didn't the G50 suit you? in your low light conditions, the G50's picture is noticeably brighter and sharper than the ax53. Only the contrast of the picture is too high, but this is adjustable, maybe lower the contrast right in the camera and remove a little sharp and it will be even better, although she did a good job in my opinion with these settings too
I will be posting yet another video today that shows an aberration I noticed that has me concerned. I will let the footage speak of itself. Thank you for commenting back and giving your input. It is greatly valued.
I'm sorry, but do you understand that the g50 has a noisy internal fan?
I hear fan noise in videos with the G70, which is similar. Thank
which one is better? Canon Vixia HF G70 or Panasonic HC-X1500GC
Hey Brian....even though the video seemed unprepared yet I understand how difficult it is to make scripts..shoot and upload videos. Best Wishes Buddy.....keep doing videos.
Thank you very much for watching and leaving your comment. That’s really my style. I don’t want to make videos that are over-edited or rehearsed. I prefer a more “real” video that shows a natural approach to delivering the content I want to share. I think it makes me come off as more genuine and easier to relate to. I certainly understand the benefit of scripting out segments and I’m just not into that approach.
Great video! Does the canon have night vision like the Sony?
Great question! No. It does not have “night vision” like the AX53 does.
just a phenomenal review!
I was torn between the two. Canon is better in low-light. Do they still sell the G50, only see the G70 for sale online?
the g70 is the successor of the g50. Very similar specs with a few modernisations, as USB-C streaming etc.
Great video, Is there a difference between Canon VIXIA HF G50 vs Canon legria HF G50?
Thank you very much. Yes - VIXIA is NTSC and LEGRIA is PAL
@@BrianBuckalew Thanks a lot!! that means LEGRIA is better than VIXIA, is it right?
It depends on where you live. This link will tell you which format works in which region of the world. Find your region and determine if PAL (LEGRIA) or NTSC (VIXIA) is what you need: cac.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2017-01-31_NTSC-PAL-Format_Definitions-and-Countries.pdf
@@BrianBuckalew Thanks Brian, going by the list PAL is available in my region, thanks a lot, very helpful!!
PERFECT!!! Glad you were able to get value out of this content. Best of luck with your purchase.
Witch is better for low light? ....without infrared
Another great question! The Canon VIXIA HF G50 has the slightly bigger sensor and with the manual controls really allows for you to dial in for whatever the shot calls for (within the capabilities of the camera that is). It can open up to F1.8 where the Sony goes to F2.0, so another advantage for the Canon. So, based on the specs and on my tests, the Canon was better in low-light than the AX-53.
@@BrianBuckalew excellent response brother. Thank you. I had a xa11 and bought a "R" but for hunting a DSLR is just to much. I'll stay canon and try to pick one up asap.
…and I don’t think you will be disappointed.
I appreciate what you are doing and it is a good, useful comparison for me in the end. But it would be nice if you sweated the production a bit more. About half of the video is explaining why you had to reshoot parts of it due to the Sony being given a custom WB and the Canon going full auto. The belch is wonderful, eh? All of this can be made to disappear with movie magic by re-filming the correct portions and leaving out any mention that it was ever a problem. I get that there is a certain attraction to the videos being made in a low-key manner, but even then it is nice to set and maintain standards for your presentation.
Canon G50 looks better than Sony AX53
And in many ways it is a superior camcorder.
Hello Sir!
I try to stream sports. Which one you think, will be better for live streaming?
Sony FDR-AX53. The autofocus of the Canon VIXIA HF G50 is crap, so you won’t get a good consistent locked-in focussed shot.
@@BrianBuckalew thanks a lot 💪
You are very welcome.
Hey Brian, just come across your video looking for a new podcast camera which one would u recommend out of the 2 just strictly for a podcast.
Sony AX53. You can just turn it on and hit record. Controlling the shutter speed to double your frame rate and you are all set. Almost guaranteed to get the shot every time.
@@BrianBuckalew thank you appreciate it 👌
You are very welcome.
@@BrianBuckalew me again 🤣, how much battery life does this camera have on hd cause I’m searching online but finding a lot of different results
A fully charged battery will normally say 170-190 min when first put in. Now, regardless of how long the battery lasts I recommend ALWAYS purchasing at least two spare batteries for every camera you own.
Oh how I hate ring lights so harsh
Sorry for the 101 question here, but at 0:12, could you explain how you have the external mic connected to the G50? I'm replacing a Canon HV20 mini dv which was great for my needs but just can't deal with tape + other issues anymore. I started the search with the Canon R800 but since that doesn't have a shoe for external accessories (I have an AT-822 external mic), I saw a step up would be the Panasonic HC-V770. But I got some room to push that so seeing what's in the next tier. Both the G50 and the Ax53 you've covered in this video are tempting, but really pushing my range. But I may just do one of them, and this video + comments are making me lean towards the G50
Alright since I've posted this comment, I've gone ahead and ordered an AX53. Amazon Warehouse had a complete AX53 w/ the only issue being slight damage to box only AX53 for $760, almost $350 off retail. The best open box/refurbished prices I was seeing on the G50 were around $900.
As I mentioned in my earlier comment, I actually was a bit more drawn to the G50 after watching your video and reading all the comments. The G50 did seem to have the better picture *but* I know you did it with a lot of manual settings adjustment and I don't really have that expertise. So I'm not sure I could even get there w/ the camera. Plus, it seems the AX53's stabilization is really something. I mainly do tripod shots but do have to do handheld sometimes so good to know I have that to take advantage of.
That said, since I am still within the return window of the AX53. I am watching an ebay auction with a G50 and a lot of other filmmaking add ons: Rode VideoMic Pro Shotgun microphone, SanDisk Extreme Pro 128GB SD card, UURig Top handle with cold shoe mount, BM Dual Charger and batteries, Libec ZC-LP LANC Zoom Control. I may throw my hat into the ring depending on how high the price gets. That said I'm not totally comfortable buying something without the ability to return, take advantage of warranty, etc.
If you are doing a lot of shots where you don’t need full manual control of your camera then the AX53 is the perfect camera for you. It will get most shots with very little need to do anything out but record. It just lacks some of the control you might want to have in less-than-optimal shooting conditions. But with a good set of video lights you will be able to get a decent shot anyway.
@@BrianBuckalew do you have any videos on good video lights?
I’m sorry, I do not. I actually use several cheap options in various sizes. I tend to like Neewer brand and I have a couple styles of those. My actual studio light kit is a LimoStudio video light kit which came with two lights; stands w/diffusers; green, black and white cloth backdrops; and a collapsible stand for the backdrops. I use the LimoStudio light kit on just about every video I make - usually just a single light is all I need.
Which one do you recommend me for using on motorsports filming?
In all honesty, Boris, if it is just between these two camcorders I am picking the Sony FDR-AX53 because it is mostly auto and will allow you to just run-and-gun. Now, the G50 has an auto mode as well, but the camera is better in manual mode and depending on your capabilities as a videographer you may prefer more auto functionality and less manual. That is going to depend on your preferences as a camera operator. But if you were leaning towards Canon and had a little more $$$ to spend then I would recommend the Canon VIXIA HF G60 which has a 1” CMOS sensor and dual pixel autofocus. That is a superior camera to both of these and will give you better results for capturing fast-moving objects. I have a handful of videos on my channel where I compare the G60 to both the G50 and AX53.
@@BrianBuckalew thank you so much Brian. Very helpful information.
Wow, this is so surprising. Everything I've found said the Sony is better, but it look like garbage in this video compared to the Canon. That's crazy.
The AX53 is a great camcorder. Trust me - there are plenty of situations where I will reach for the AX53 over the G50, but in the end the manual mode on the G50 and the ability to record 10-bit 4.2.2 out of the HDMI port make it a more professional-grade camcorder.
@@BrianBuckalew Thank you SO much for your reply. I been going crazy for weeks now trying to find the right camcorder for my podcast. I've narrowed it down to the Sony FDR-AX53, Panasonic HC-VX51, Canon G50 and Canon G60. Still having trouble deciding, but it sounds like you prefer the G60, correct? If not, the G50 from what I read in all your other replies.
G60 has the 1” sensor - you can’t beat that, but it costs upwards of $1,600.00 and I can’t afford that right now. I will eventually own a G60, just have to sell a couple items first. Lol. If you are doing a podcast and have a budget around $1,000.00-range, you can’t go wrong with either the AX53 or the G50. The G50 does have the larger sensor and has manual mode - but manual mode may not be important to you. The G50 also is larger and feels better built. It you hold the AX53 in one hand and the G50 in the other you will notice how much better built the G50 is. But there is absolutely nothing wrong with the AX53. I would be fine with it if that was my only camcorder. I really mean that. In the end you have to ask yourself what features are most important to you.
@linop412 4 months later what did you ultimately buy?
I bought a G60 - the big brother to the G50. I also still own the AX53 for its simplistic approach. You can just turn it on and get the shot. So, I have a quick shot camera (AX53) and a more complex manual camera that allows me to get the shot the way I want it for more advanced type of shoots (G60). They are used for completely different types of videos.
The difference in the color rendition is big! Sony is warmer (although it normally tends to be cooler than other cameras), but sharpness is terrible, why is that? Normally the AX-53 performs better.
Was the Sony defective? This comparison isn't even close.
No, sir. The FDR-AX53 is in perfect condition and is still being used almost every time I make a studio video. There are differences between these two cameras, that is for sure. I will say the way it is being used in this video is not the AX53’s strong suit. I have other videos that prove this. The AX53 is a fine camcorder and does some things very well. Low-light shots definitely are not one of them, or even a fairly lit room like in this video.
Looks like AX53 is out of focus.
I like the Sony’s colors better, but the Canon is crispy edges
They are both great camcorders. You can do things with the Sony that you can’t do on the Canon and vice versa.
Hi Brian,
Thanks for the reviews.
Looking to replace 2020 sony cx675 $600. 1080p 6 lux BOSS gimbel stabilization.
I was looking at left over g50 until I saw your vid. Did you have in dynamic or is camera defective ?
See this other vid that looks good in dynamic. ruclips.net/video/IveZaT8qiQU/видео.html
Current available are Cx 405 6 lux NO BOSS or AX 53 with BOSS Gimble but 9 lux 4k, 6 lux 1080p. So same poor low light as cx405 & cx675.
Low light examples
ruclips.net/video/TleMTjzSCNM/видео.html
So did you have g70 in dynamic or is camera defective ?
Have you done review on cx405 1/5.8 vs g50 1/2.3 vs g60 1/1 vs g70 1/2.3 vs ax53 1/2.5 ?
G70 10/22 updated g50 with bigger screen and double dots.
Thank again for reviews.
No, G50 was not defective - it was brand new. I would blame me more than a camera. I used all of the stabilization modes to try and see which one worked best. I did not have a G70, only G50, G60, and now XF400 (best of all). All other items you mentioned I have never owned. Just AX53 along with the three Canon models I just mentioned.
как вы научили ах53 так плохо снимать?
My apologies - I am not sure exactly what you are asking, but Google Translate provided this: "how did you teach ax53 to shoot so badly?". If this is what you were asking I am not sure what to really say. The results of this video speak for themselves.
I do stand by my comments that the G50 is a better overall camera than the Sony FDR-AX53.
minute 5 is your decision
Actually, I’d prefer my decision be minute 6.
Sony looked bad in the beginning because of the lighting.
The lighting is the same in every shot. What I mean is, although I change camera locations, the two camcorders are dealing with the exact same lighting setups in each shot.
@@BrianBuckalew thanks
I wonder why Canon camcorders always have a washed out color.
Hello Kizarat. I can't say they all do - this is literally the only Canon camcorder I have ever owned. Now, I do own a Canon DSLR and a Canon mirrorless camera and the color on both of those is fabulous. I would have to look at footage from other Canon camcorders to see if what you are saying is accurate. Also, I do like the color off of the G50, especially outdoors in proper sunlight. I think the colors pop quite nicely when I take this G50 outside with a clear sky providing some decent light. Indoors I just have never been able to get good quality in my home studio, so I apologize for my footage here.
Turn up your audio holy
Yeah Felix, my apologies. I know the audio level is low. I uploaded it in a hurry without doing any audio processing. It is completely my mistake.
@@BrianBuckalew Understood. Thanks.