Surprising Ike Gauntlet MPG Winner: Ram 1500 HEMI V8 vs Ford F-150 Hybrid V6 Towing Test Comparison!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 июн 2024
  • ( genyhitch.com/ ) Surprising Ike Gauntlet Winner: Ram 1500 HEMI V8 vs Ford F-150 Hybrid V6 - Towing Test Comparison
    ( / tflcar ) Visit our Patreon page to support the TFL team!
    00:00-1:12 Intro
    1:13-2:03 Ram Fill-up
    2:04-8:51 Ram Uphill
    8:52-9:22 Tailgate War
    9:23-12:26 Ram Downhill
    12:27-14:03 Ram MPG
    14:04-15:15 Truck Squat
    15:16-16:14 Ford Fill-up
    16:15-22:16 Ford Uphill
    22:17-25:30 Ford Downhill
    25:31- 27:06 Ford MPG
    27:07-28:41 Verdict
    Watch more videos from TFL Studios:
    The Fast Lane Truck ( / tfltruck )
    The Fast Lane Car ( / tflcar )
    TFLoffroad ( / tfloffroad )
    TFLbike ( / @tflbike )
    TFLnow ( / tflnow )
    TFLclassics ( / tflclassics )
    TFLtalk ( / tfltalk )
    TFL Podcasts:
    TFL Talkin' Cars Podcast ( tflcar.libsyn.com/ )
    TFL Talkin' Trucks Podcast ( tfltruck.libsyn.com/ )
    #Ram1500 #FordF150 #Ikegauntlet
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 2 тыс.

  • @kevinblock2307
    @kevinblock2307 3 года назад +252

    Ike!!! Love these with Mr Truck and Andre

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 3 года назад +18

      Thanks

    • @IamNotTheAnswer
      @IamNotTheAnswer 3 года назад +3

      They are the best on RUclips I'm my opinion.. I'm just glad they decommunized Ivan lol

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 3 года назад +4

      @@IamNotTheAnswer Thanks

  • @drewelliott9062
    @drewelliott9062 3 года назад +98

    "Mister Truck are you asleep?"
    "No I'm just taking a nap"😂

    • @LouieSmithSenior
      @LouieSmithSenior 3 года назад +6

      And "looking for hole's in my eyeballs."

    • @MrKleru
      @MrKleru 3 года назад +3

      My friend always take a nap before sleeping😜

    • @Lucky-yi9lu
      @Lucky-yi9lu 2 года назад

      That was a plug for the Fords awesome "hotel alternative". Some will choose a truck for that exact reason.

  • @jamesklinkhammer7539
    @jamesklinkhammer7539 3 года назад +130

    I owned a 11 ecoboost and now a 21 ram with 3.21 gears and 5.7 hemi e torque,,Don't plan on towing heavy so it's a good choice for me. The rams interior is so well thought out. And the coil spring suspension rides like your in a dream

    • @tieoneon1614
      @tieoneon1614 3 года назад +8

      Ram definitely rides smoother, but the coilsprings need airbags if u are going to tow anything other than a small trailer. My bud has a '19 Ram, i got a '18 F150. We compare all the time and we both like each others trucks. He put air bags in, i put Bilsteins in the rear. From that it was just personal preference on looks and sound

    • @fasterthanyou7605
      @fasterthanyou7605 3 года назад +15

      I have a 21 ram and my brother has a 21 Ford and my dad has a 19 ram. They are all amazing I just live ram and he loves Ford 🤷🏻‍♂️ we share a 18 3500 Cummins when any of us needs to tow heavy and it all works just buy what you like 😋

    • @zephxiii
      @zephxiii 3 года назад +7

      I really like both the F150 and Ram, kudos to both teams.

    • @tedschmitt178
      @tedschmitt178 3 года назад +7

      I test drove a Dodge and thought the ride was too soft. And that soft ride = lower payload. I bought a F-150.

    • @gasolinediesel972
      @gasolinediesel972 3 года назад +12

      Considering these trucks spend 99% of their time not towing, it was a smart decision for Ram to use coilovers and not leafs.

  • @nithishjvj8736
    @nithishjvj8736 3 года назад +34

    2:15 AM and I'm watching 2 guys testing top tier trucks with peak load uphill, Trucks that aren't even available in my place, nor I've seen them ever in my life

  • @tranz15
    @tranz15 3 года назад +188

    Andre has come along way from speaking Russian and checking brake temps to now hosting segments well done another great video .. maybe yall can get a 7500 lb travel trailer to measure how the trucks handle sway at speed running the interstate

    • @DJKiDDKlashez
      @DJKiDDKlashez 2 года назад +6

      I remember those days.. I was here before 2000 subscribers

    • @stephendavid9101
      @stephendavid9101 2 года назад +5

      He speaks much better than Mr. Truck.

    • @MrLuisinho90
      @MrLuisinho90 2 года назад

      Yes I remember him from the 2013 Ram video with the Pentastar when I was in the market for a half ton truck

    • @austinjones9970
      @austinjones9970 2 года назад +1

      Why does this comment always come up

    • @bret9741
      @bret9741 2 года назад +4

      @@austinjones9970 lol.. why, does it bother you? I think we like to see how he has become so “American”.

  • @silentmajority2347
    @silentmajority2347 3 года назад +7

    Great video as always! I love that these are ran with the most outfitted high end models too, real world numbers! As for which would I choose.... well I’m a Cummins guy and always have been for 30 years. I’ve had 7 trucks outfitted with it and I truly love the Longhorn interior so for me it would be the Ram if I was to ever own a half ton gas truck. I think now days it comes down to only two factors. Brand preferences and not getting a lemon from the start. Each truck manufacturer has pushed the bar to the limit and have figured out how to put power where it’s needed to get the job done. Every manufacturer has bad apples, has inherent problems in one way or another that plague them and tarnish their reputation. Our Ram Longhorn 3500 dually 4x4 is my daily driver and what we use to haul the 17k 5ver and 21k triple axle stock trailer. People always ask what my unloaded mpg is and ask if I wish I had another truck as a daily driver. I say no. The cost of another truck far outweighs the savings in fuel. Again, great video and thank you!

  • @mnichols2773
    @mnichols2773 3 года назад +4

    Sweet job on doing the calculation for the mpg. Keep improving and Keep it up TFL!

  • @carterbishop2935
    @carterbishop2935 Год назад +6

    just bought a used 21 Laramie with 10K on the odo. Has the regular hemi ( no e torque), 3.21 rear axle. Drove it from Detroit MI to Lexington KY averaging 75 mph and got 21.7 mpg. Had just under 1000 pounds in the bed so I was very pleased with the fuel economy.

  • @soccerslus
    @soccerslus 3 года назад +32

    That intro music for the IKE never gets old. It's been too long since I've seen one of these and of course will be waiting on seeing a very entertaining ford lightning test later this year!

    • @peterlewiskingstonwentziii7253
      @peterlewiskingstonwentziii7253 3 года назад

      Demo ranch and off the ranch have the same music

    • @caryhuffii7224
      @caryhuffii7224 3 года назад

      That ford lighting will probably die on the way up to the mountain.😂😂😂

    • @soccerslus
      @soccerslus 3 года назад

      @@caryhuffii7224 🤣🤣

    • @ronp1018
      @ronp1018 2 года назад

      These idiots don’t know how to do a truck test,

  • @TheRamGuy
    @TheRamGuy 3 года назад +14

    Thank you for finally bringing back Mr.Truck and Andre on an Ike Gauntlet. This is the content that got me hooked years ago

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 3 года назад +4

      Thanks

    • @acdii
      @acdii 3 года назад

      AND NO FACE PAMPERS!!!

  • @bradhughes6290
    @bradhughes6290 2 года назад +2

    This test was so helpful in my decision of which truck to buy. I live in Indiana and never tow at maximum capacity. But for the small percentage of people that tow heavy loads up mountains everyday, they thank you.

  • @derekhodge1339
    @derekhodge1339 3 года назад +7

    The assessment on the ford is pretty accurate to what I see. I tow a 26' toy hauler all over the Carolinas, and I average about 7mpg with the Powerboost. My trailer weight ranges from 8500 to 9000 depending on configuration. There are a couple of interesting config things I have seen with the Ford. I get better fuel mileage in sport mode while towing because the engine carries more rpm and less boost. I get way better milage off the highway. Sometimes as high as 12 mpg. I believe this to be because the hybrid system is providing support until about 45mph. Even when I am unloaded the truck never runs in electric only mode beyond 45mp. Also on downhills, you can set a gear limiter so that you can force it to use a lower gear even though the truck does not seem to want to.

  • @amorosoequi
    @amorosoequi 3 года назад +313

    For some reason I'm not really surprised with the mpg. I feel like Ford's tech is great to save fuel during idle conditions and light city drive, but towing is a whole different game.

    • @Steve-yr5vi
      @Steve-yr5vi 3 года назад +32

      Turbo is not Ford tech, they are probably the best at it however it delivers as promised. If I towed constantly I'd buy a super duty, most 1/2 tons tow less often than not. Turbo delivers as promised, I own one and have no interest in getting another V8, unless it's a turbo 8. When I tow with my mine it'll knock my mpg average down from 19-20 to 14-15 but I am not flooring it, to save mpg with a turbo drive at constant speed. I'm on the east coast, when cross the continental divide in West. Virginia un-boosted trucks can't keep up, meanwhile I'm in cruise the rpm gauge never breaks 2k my average for the trip will be 20. My F150 get's better real world mpg's than many of the care based SUV's on the roads today

    • @wzDH106
      @wzDH106 3 года назад +12

      1.5 kWh isn't much for energy storage. A descent while towing would need a significantly larger battery to consume that energy on the way down.

    • @stevenhanna6973
      @stevenhanna6973 3 года назад +23

      Ok let them test the ram with the 373 rear end

    • @jimsiggy
      @jimsiggy 3 года назад +26

      @@stevenhanna6973 What would be the point? The truck made the climb, with the taller gear just fine. It seems to me, the RAM would loose MPG with the 3.73, so why would you do that?

    • @MidwayGuy
      @MidwayGuy 3 года назад +4

      @@jimsiggy Right as Mr Truck said, the Ford had a 3.91 rear but three OD gears on the ten speed so the final drive ratio versus the 8 speed Ram with 3.11 rears was probably very close

  • @thepeddle
    @thepeddle 3 года назад +83

    More proof that trucks are close enough that it boils down to your personal choice. I prefer the look of the ram inside and out. So I choose to drive Ram. So unless someone is giving me 70 grand plus to buy a truck they prefer.... I'll be spending my hard earned cash where I want and you do the same. Great video as always fellas!

    • @spacebound1969
      @spacebound1969 3 года назад +6

      Except one can run your house when the power is out, or your tools, while getting better gas mileage while doing common driving. While you're right it's down to preference, the Ford is more capable then the RAM and only in this test (with different rear ratios mind you) did the RAM finally come out on top.

    • @philllsxga.7737
      @philllsxga.7737 3 года назад +2

      My buddy does collision for a living he says every manufacturer is supplied with the same suppliers Lear seats Johnson control this Johnson control that Hyundai Kia Toyota Ford Chrysler GM they all use the same suppliers you're basically getting a rebadged vehicle with a different engines that's it!!
      Don't believe me?? take them apart and look for yourselves...
      The vents in my Silverado look identical to the vents in an F-150...
      The dome light switch in my Silverado is identical to the dome light switch in a Toyota.
      If you take the door panels off a current Colorado it's the same door shell and window regulators in a Toyota pickup truck...
      And the Ford bronco is just a Land Rover defender rebadged it's all the same s***.....

    • @richardalfaro4933
      @richardalfaro4933 3 года назад +8

      No .. they are not close at all in terms of quality and king term use ... It's Ford number one by a mile , then Chevy but they stopped making good trucks in 2003 but their 2500s are still good and then Ram .. ram has always been the 3rd best in quality and always falls apart... Honestly though if toytoa actually focused on a full size pick up truck it would be number one but it's just an after thought for them

    • @locogtr6475
      @locogtr6475 3 года назад +3

      @@philllsxga.7737 hell no none on that is correct.

    • @richardalfaro4933
      @richardalfaro4933 3 года назад +1

      @@philllsxga.7737 lol .. you do understand that hundai is garbage 🗑️ ... Kia is garbage ... Chrysler is garbage ... Land Rover is garbage ... And the new bronco sport is garbage 🗑️

  • @neitzp
    @neitzp 3 года назад +1

    Exactly what I wanted to know. Thank you TFL!!!

  • @kirkenstang
    @kirkenstang 3 года назад +2

    Great video guys and yes you can see what gear you’re in on the Ram. You just have to turn it on in the screen settings.

  • @mdragon99
    @mdragon99 3 года назад +16

    Weird how these Ike Gauntlet vids work so well as infotainment. I love them all! Trucks doing truck stuff!

  • @nhlcfl7733
    @nhlcfl7733 3 года назад +13

    As others have mentioned, love the test Andre and Kent. The rear end ratio may have played into this, yet if I may describe RAM as the underdog, I'm happy for them - I like the idea of e-torque more than I do with more expensive and complicated systems of hybrid + turbos. RAM have come a long way in the past few years and I even had two in the past twenty and they never had issues and the ride was comfortable and the interior & styling was very nice.

  • @jedison3414
    @jedison3414 Год назад +1

    Excellent real world testing. Keep up the good work!

  • @stanfordbanks3399
    @stanfordbanks3399 2 года назад +1

    First of all I love you guys. I watch your channel because it does help me better understand the trucks and their capabilities before I buy. Now with all that said it's time for your show to start setting up these trucks with the same off road tires with like speaks so we can see who is best on road, mud, sand, rocks, gas mileage, tow and snow. I believe the only changes you would need to make are tires, close gearing and ride height. If you put ten to fifteen videos together showing these trucks in sand, mud, road, towing, rocks, milage and snow views like myself will be glued to your videos and most likely they will become most viewed... Thanks for reading and good luck guys... The Banks Family

  • @jamesnelson8715
    @jamesnelson8715 3 года назад +14

    Picking up my 21Longhorn Monday June 7.Ordered it March 30 and it is finally in,PUMPED !!!

    • @tr4u5mp90
      @tr4u5mp90 3 года назад +1

      You'll be taking it back for electrical problems on Tuesday.

    • @SiccSideKali4Nia209
      @SiccSideKali4Nia209 3 года назад +5

      @@tr4u5mp90 lies i have a 19 limited and its great

    • @SiccSideKali4Nia209
      @SiccSideKali4Nia209 3 года назад +4

      Congratulations 👏, i have over 37k on mine so far so good. I have the 5.7 Hemi with Etorque. I averaged 22.5 miles cruising at 70-75 on a 1.5 hr trip recently. Going uphill was different got about 21.2

    • @-beastbryce-6273
      @-beastbryce-6273 3 года назад +2

      Your going to love if it love mine with no issues

    • @fasterthanyou7605
      @fasterthanyou7605 3 года назад +5

      @@tr4u5mp90 okay dude you’re cool. My 2021 has 39k miles no issues abs my fourth gen 2017 I just traded last year had 127k no issues and my entire fleet I buy all my salesman ram 1500 bighorns with the entertainment level 2 package and never had an issue.

  • @Spiritbro77
    @Spiritbro77 2 года назад +30

    The Ram guys will love the Ram and Ford guys the Ford. I JUST leased a 2021 Ram today so I am also biased lol. Seriously, brand loyalty is silly. Brands aren't loyal to us... I got what I thought was a good deal and I hope I made the right choice. That is all any of us can do. Good luck to us all :) Be safe and be well everyone! It's more than a little crazy out there these days...

    • @Lensync7
      @Lensync7 2 года назад

      Dude that was well said!

    • @davesnothere3425
      @davesnothere3425 2 года назад +1

      They both suck. Get a Tundra

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 2 года назад +3

      @taco Timmy
      This vid is about trucks and towing. Why involve a Tieota?

    • @davesnothere3425
      @davesnothere3425 2 года назад +1

      @@paulhunter9613 I forgot you domestic guys don't care about reliability or build quality.

    • @tedmccauley9319
      @tedmccauley9319 2 года назад +2

      Bingo, I’m on my 4th Ford in 30 years and never had an issue, if you can say that about your truck you better stick with the brand, your doing good.

  • @snoboy5898
    @snoboy5898 8 месяцев назад +1

    All I can say is you guys rock! Excellent, well done videos

  • @ZapFlashD
    @ZapFlashD 3 года назад +11

    If I needed a truck, I'd have to go with RAM. I'm partial to them because my dad has one and I love that thing like crazy. It's the only old vehicle I'd drive because it means so much to me. Ford has a great product too.

  • @GTFORDMAN
    @GTFORDMAN 3 года назад +149

    you need a taller hill? ok get this for a torture test episode; "Pikes Peak towing test"

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 3 года назад +10

      Yes we do, it's hard to find with 4 lanes

    • @rockycadieux4642
      @rockycadieux4642 3 года назад +1

      Get a plow, hook it up and plow the field.

    • @WW-wf8tu
      @WW-wf8tu 3 года назад +8

      @@MrTruckTV I don't know about 4 lanes, but Slumgullion Pass is claimed to be the steepest grade in all of Colorado. Surely you all know about it?

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 3 года назад +3

      @@WW-wf8tu Haven't heard of it. The Ike is not easy that's why we need 4 lanes.

    • @earl60446
      @earl60446 3 года назад +1

      @@MrTruckTV Problem with the IKE is that most (large majority) of the time people are towing on a level highway or slight inclines. So the IKE is not representative of most peoples towing experiences. So the IKE is a worst case scenario for MPG and braking, not a typical case scenario.

  • @ca7889
    @ca7889 2 года назад +4

    Good review I personally bought the 2021 ram 1500 bighorn and was amazed at what it's capable of and that hemi eTorque was worth the extra money to keep that V8 sound -now that's American. But honestly there will always be some rivalry among Ram-Ford and Chevy buy what you need and like it's your money.

    • @question_it_701
      @question_it_701 Год назад

      Why do folks argue about vehicle brands but they don't argue about potato chip brands, under armour vs nike, verizon vs at & t? But you talk about vehicles and folks get wound up. Why?

  • @dalelangehennig161
    @dalelangehennig161 2 месяца назад +1

    This is quickly becoming my favorite channel of any genre. I feel like Andre and Mr. Truck are the buddies I hang out with after work and talk trucks! So few would understand my brain and how therapeutic this is. I am obsessing over what truck to buy for my daily commuter / random stuff hauler / but also to tow my tri-toon that sits high on the trailer and pulls like pulling a billboard in a very windy part of the country but that will also fit in my garage. Oh, the decisions! Fun to hang out and watch all these though! Keep it up FLT!

  • @jyharris
    @jyharris 3 года назад

    Great video. So glad there will be more Ike videos. Mr Truck and Andrey are great together!

  • @ostmk496
    @ostmk496 3 года назад +19

    Finally Ike Gauntlet, love it!!

  • @SkylarRace
    @SkylarRace 3 года назад +55

    My Ford F150 XL STX with 2.7 Ecoboost and 36 gallon tank can vary from 400 - 800 miles of range depending on the driving conditions. It's crazy how much more fuel it uses when you're in the throttle but man that little 2.7 has insane acceleration and awesome torque.

    • @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761
      @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 2 года назад +4

      I get 1400 to 1500 km to a tank every tank. 8.7 to 9.3L per 100kms

    • @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761
      @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 2 года назад +3

      I'd take the f150 forsure

    • @jrod7017
      @jrod7017 2 года назад +3

      @@fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 No question! I agree.

    • @ubeuonly
      @ubeuonly Год назад +3

      Perfectly adequate when you're not telling something huge. A good balance between power and economy

    • @townhall05446
      @townhall05446 Год назад

      I think the F150 without the power boost would be just fine for trailering, it has proven that in a lot of tests - and that lets you get the 36 gallon fuel tank which is fantastic to have.

  • @06colkurtz
    @06colkurtz 3 года назад

    YESSSSS This is what we signed up for! Great video guys. Thanks

  • @jessefleming9763
    @jessefleming9763 3 года назад +10

    Loved it. I'd really love to see this again with all 3 trucks and their 3.0L Diesels

    • @blueryxfalls7949
      @blueryxfalls7949 3 года назад +3

      Haven't they done it jet? Either way, Duramax is king

    • @carltongray3302
      @carltongray3302 3 года назад +2

      The 3L Duramax would murder the other two .

    • @jessefleming9763
      @jessefleming9763 3 года назад

      @@carltongray3302 oh probably lol, but I want to see how bad

    • @gord7025
      @gord7025 2 года назад +1

      No point in testing Ford's now it's been discontinued. Apparently the ECOBOOST engines are so efficient that people just are buying them instead of the diesel lol.

  • @kevenharvey9711
    @kevenharvey9711 3 года назад +172

    Turbo engines run rich under high load to prevent knock, totally predictable. Hybrid system only helps in start/stop situations.

    • @willieguapo
      @willieguapo 3 года назад +29

      Ford knows 9 out of 10 buyers won't tow daily. So hybrid system really shines

    • @zelenizub2036
      @zelenizub2036 3 года назад +9

      Anything hybrid is garbage.

    • @rebelcitysports1outlook713
      @rebelcitysports1outlook713 3 года назад +22

      Hybrid shines in city driving conditions.

    • @mauricemotors8207
      @mauricemotors8207 3 года назад +38

      @@zelenizub2036 That’s a myth hybrids are only junk to you CAUSE you don’t understand them

    • @AkronKid330
      @AkronKid330 3 года назад +13

      @@mauricemotors8207 exactly. Uneducated.

  • @robrechtart
    @robrechtart 3 года назад +53

    No step needed if you have the trailer hitch to step on!

  • @Goodbarsix
    @Goodbarsix 3 года назад +1

    So stoked the IKEs are back!

  • @Generallymopar426
    @Generallymopar426 3 года назад +45

    I’m so blown away! Ram has come such a long way! You can turbo anything and it will have more torque and power. But nothing beats a reliable hemi v8

    • @latonywoods9581
      @latonywoods9581 2 года назад

      Oh really Toyota’s way more complicated DOHC 5.7L is absolutely superior in durability to any Hemi! Ram / Dodge has been building push-rod engines for over 50 years, and still can match the durability of Toyota’s engines!

    • @danrather5473
      @danrather5473 2 года назад +10

      Toyotas are for homosexuals and gardeners

    • @treyroberts8124
      @treyroberts8124 2 года назад +6

      @@latonywoods9581 ironic seeing as the Ram 1500 ranked most reliable half-ton from 2010-2020 based on actual invoices from thousands of auto shops around the country

    • @terrencejones9817
      @terrencejones9817 2 года назад

      @@treyroberts8124 what a joke that is.

    • @siedlaczek7118
      @siedlaczek7118 2 года назад +1

      Yea it came from junk to garbage

  • @sgtwizzleteats4130
    @sgtwizzleteats4130 3 года назад +34

    23:50, that truck driver is having a bad day.

  • @tammieandrzejczuk2573
    @tammieandrzejczuk2573 3 года назад +13

    Both of these trucks are pretty awesome, i would be happy with either one.

  • @carldrolet6414
    @carldrolet6414 3 года назад +49

    I would love to see the numbers of this test with a RAM with the 3.91 dif.

    • @radar-yp9br
      @radar-yp9br 2 года назад +6

      3.92

    • @hi4429
      @hi4429 2 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/2ML7VrFA8xA/видео.html The 3.92 truck seems stronger than the 3.21 truck. Not a apples to apples comparison though. Different trailers and the 3.92 truck had heavy off-road tires.

    • @kenrobinson1099
      @kenrobinson1099 2 года назад +6

      @@hi4429 I can tell you for a fact out of experience.. My 17 Ram had 3:21s and my 2019 Classic had 3:21s and my 2021 Ram has 3:92's and they make a world of difference in towing without sacrificing fuel economy. I can tow my 20 ft cuddy on hilly roads at 65 mph and it pulls the boat with a lot less effort and still pump out 17 mpg.

    • @daveevans7151
      @daveevans7151 2 года назад

      @@kenrobinson1099 That is good to hear. Have a '20 with that rear end and looking at travel trailers (27-29 ft) and live in CO. Super curious as to how it will handle the hills here.

    • @LINA2COOL4YOU
      @LINA2COOL4YOU Год назад

      I have a 2021 Ram 1500 quad cab classic warlock 4x4, 5.7 with 3.92 gears she is rated right at 11,450 for towing big difference in rear ends and payload by gears

  • @georgiafan6618
    @georgiafan6618 3 года назад +21

    I would have guessed the Ford would easily win. Love that Ram. Soon manufacturers will be ridding themselves of V8s and moving toward EVs. I’ll take a V8 any day. Good helpful review.

  • @petrbenda3406
    @petrbenda3406 3 года назад +80

    Small turbocharged engines are awesome as long as you don't need them to deliver lots of power all the time. Once the turbo starts pushing, you need a rich mixture cooling down the cylinders to avoid engine knock. This way lots of fuel is wasted on cooling without producing any power. If I had to tow heavy trailers like this on a regular basis, I would definitely go for the larger displacement, but for stuff like commuting and the occasional off road adventure I will happily stick with the smaller turbocharged engine.

    • @brentloftis3746
      @brentloftis3746 3 года назад +2

      Agree. Using fuel for cylinder cooling is a factor when heavily loading an engine that uses turbos to approximate the performance of a larger engine.

    • @ryansheard8092
      @ryansheard8092 3 года назад +9

      I agree with the "why" of worse MPG but I'll always take the TC engine because it's gonna deliver more capability for towing even though it's at a bit lower MPG. the RAM V8 only outperforms the TC V6 on MPG and nothing else. Not worth it.

    • @Steve-yr5vi
      @Steve-yr5vi 3 года назад +9

      I guess you missed they towed 7800 lbs because that is the RAM's max tow rating while the Ford is rated for 4000 lbs more. The Ford has a 3:73 rear end the RAM as a 3.21, put a Ford with the 3:21 rear end in that contest and the mpgs will be about the same and the comment will still be "the 3.5 made it up the mountain effortlessly, the Ram was giving all it had." FYI if you're running a truck on a regular basis at it's limit don't expect it to hold together that long.

    • @tieoneon1614
      @tieoneon1614 3 года назад +4

      The EcoBeast turbos are built into the manifolds and are water cooled

    • @oogleboogle123456789
      @oogleboogle123456789 3 года назад +6

      @@Steve-yr5vi it would only be at its limit on that specific hill so anywhere else like down here at sea level and it'll chug along happily gotta remember naturally aspirated engines struggle 2 miles above sea level so if you are at a high elevation then yes turbos will be your friend but at sea level it doesn't really matter much because if your towing 10k+ all the time just get a 3/4 ton instead

  • @davidsande2342
    @davidsande2342 3 года назад +6

    I'd be curious to see a comparison using the adaptive cruise control.
    Definitely like the ram tailgate the best but the 7.2 power station in the Ford is
    what I would go for.
    They just need to adapt the breaking to dynamic braking like trains have
    for slowing the trucks down, although looking at your results there might
    be some of that happening with the Ford because fuel consumption goes up
    when dynamic breaking occurs.

  • @tomhoots
    @tomhoots 3 года назад

    Always fun with Andre and Mr. Truck!

  • @brandonmcfarland5200
    @brandonmcfarland5200 3 года назад +1

    Those 2 Engines Are The Beast & They Are My Favorites Along With The 6.2L Big Boy V8 With The 10 Speed Automatic Transmission From Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Which I Loved The Most & Those 3 Engines Can Tow Between 6700 LBS & 9600 LBS Going Up The Hill.

  • @wwz1011
    @wwz1011 3 года назад +23

    Ford needs the 2.7 EB, with full plug in hybrid. That would be ideal for me. Plug in range of around 50 miles would be perfect for around town.

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 3 года назад +1

      I have never seen anybody advertise a plug-in range for a PHEV of 50 miles. Especially with a heavy vehicle with a lot of frontal area like a truck.

    • @ericensley2427
      @ericensley2427 2 года назад

      @@andyharman3022 the Chevy volt is the only PHEV with 50 mies of range. And that number is pretty perfect. If they made one with 80 miles of range and a 150hp range extender would be awesome. Takes about 100hp to tow a 23' boat at 70mph. Would not be able to maintain full speed up the Ike, but hey that is ok.

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 2 года назад

      @@ericensley2427 Dream on. The 50 mile range of the 2nd gen Volt was based on the Federal fuel economy test, which only requires an average power of ~10 hp for an average cycle speed of 29 mph. It takes a lot more power (and probably more than the 100 hp you quote) to tow a 23' boat at 70 mph, and the 18.4 kW*hr battery pack would be flat in 10 minutes at the 111 kW that the Volt main motor is rated at. Then the car is down to 55 kW from the range extender engine/generator set. The only boat that a Volt could get up the Ike would be an inflatable dinghy in the trunk.

    • @ericensley2427
      @ericensley2427 2 года назад

      @@andyharman3022 you math looks pretty spot on. I was not trying to use the volt as a tow vehicle. The 100hp at 70 was on flat ground. (Tesla model X vids show about 85kw to tow on flat ground) My point in what I was trying to dream of, would be a truck that has 50-80 mile battery with a gas range extender of something in the 150hp range. I am dreaming because this does not exist. And the battery would need to be 30-40kw to get a truck 50-80miles of range. It would be nice to be able to pull ur boat to the ramp and then have the range extender give u half charge or so. Then on the drive home the range extender keeps the battery at 20%. I know, I'm dreaming.... :(

    • @ericensley2427
      @ericensley2427 2 года назад

      @@andyharman3022 did some tests, 29 mph uses 3-4kw. 45mph uses about 9-10kw on a 2nd gen volt.

  • @LandParkColby
    @LandParkColby 3 года назад +4

    I just picked up a 2021 Powerboost F150 - Andre you are a reason why!! Great video with very fair commentary. Oh, and I traded my 2020 F250 Godzilla V8 for the new ride (I drive A LOT and trade often - 47K miles last year) The F250 gave me NO troubles, ever! Keep up the great work.

  • @rdbjr52
    @rdbjr52 3 года назад +9

    Gentlemen, thank you for the terrific review. Would you kindly state what the payload sticker read on the Ford and Ram? In this weight class that is critical. Thank you.

  • @CfRlCajunfishRiplips
    @CfRlCajunfishRiplips 3 года назад +1

    That watch Mr. Truck was wearing added a few pounds to the GCWR lol. Another great video by Mr. Truck and Andre. Very surprised on those results. Keep up the great work guys.

  • @dexcarr2717
    @dexcarr2717 Год назад +3

    For about a year I towed 10-14k lbs roofing dump trailers with my 17 2.7 eco F150. That was in 2018, i still have the truck today and its just fine at 128k miles now. The ecoboost's are amazing engines.

    • @donnysmith7162
      @donnysmith7162 6 месяцев назад +1

      Turbos are overdue to fail! Ask me how I know!?😂Ford mechanics tell you go with the 5.0!

    • @dexcarr2717
      @dexcarr2717 6 месяцев назад

      @@donnysmith7162 Lol, one of them actually started leaking/smoking so I traded it in not too long after I made that comment.

  • @TiannaSaoirseWichaSacikaM
    @TiannaSaoirseWichaSacikaM 3 года назад +6

    Love these comparisons. Always been a dodge/ram kinda girl, this just makes me more resolved. Thanks Ike and Mr. Truck!

  • @Fork4Fun
    @Fork4Fun 3 года назад +25

    I get anxiety every time I see you guys camping in the left lane. LOL

  • @jsabo4
    @jsabo4 3 года назад +2

    Nice comparison. 5.7 peak power is right where you had it most of the time around that 4-4500 mark as for the 3.5 eco boost peak torque is around 2500-3000 rpms if I remember.

  • @MrVikingdane
    @MrVikingdane 3 года назад +30

    Cant wait for the 150Lightning test :)

    • @berowawa3907
      @berowawa3907 3 года назад +8

      It will suck at towing just like the Tesla especially this test

    • @MrVikingdane
      @MrVikingdane 3 года назад +3

      @@berowawa3907 just curious to see what it can do

    • @goingindieEN
      @goingindieEN 3 года назад +5

      Def interesting to see what it can do. If anyone can push towing boundaries, it’s defiantly Ford.

    • @huemongus3742
      @huemongus3742 3 года назад +8

      It will hit seven minutes and thirty seconds and the battery will die. ☠️

    • @willieguapo
      @willieguapo 3 года назад +3

      It's going to do very well. Yes it will use a lot of battery but Ford knows that. That is why they claim 300 mile range conservatively. That's towing range. Without towing it'll be closer to 450+

  • @brianhurley8617
    @brianhurley8617 3 года назад +51

    Great video and proves that the Ram Hemi is tried and true.

    • @bradmcdonald3479
      @bradmcdonald3479 3 года назад +8

      Tried and true because it made one trip up a hill? Thats all it takes to impress you ram drivers?

    • @aday1637
      @aday1637 3 года назад +10

      Had the Ram, lost the engine at 47,000 miles...got the Ford, 300K miles later still running. Would not get the Ram again, no matter the numbers. I like money in my wallet not in the service bay at Ram.

    • @bryan70546
      @bryan70546 3 года назад +3

      @@aday1637 cool story

    • @ec3886
      @ec3886 2 года назад +2

      @@bryan70546 Typical story*

    • @bryan70546
      @bryan70546 2 года назад +7

      @@ec3886 not really I've own many rams and never had issues now the fords I've had were a different story

  • @chillywilly3397
    @chillywilly3397 2 года назад

    Great review. Thank you

  • @SergioDickerson-hw3ox
    @SergioDickerson-hw3ox 6 месяцев назад

    Always the best content guys thanks! One aspect that may not be obvious with just comparing fuel economy is range that results from the regeneration that occurs from the hybrid - gas combination. My point here is that the mileage difference may be offset by the overall mileage achieved when combining the fuel and battery economy. Maybe worth running a similar test and measure the overall range of both vehicles and determine which truck is ultimately the most efficient. Just my recommendation!

  • @ryanwollum6744
    @ryanwollum6744 3 года назад +16

    Glad to see Mr. Truck back! Andre and Mr.T act like an old married couple and I love it

  • @juliussenn2443
    @juliussenn2443 2 года назад +11

    Anyone else notice the Ram's oil temp was at 275! That coolant/ oil temp difference is insane!

    • @faultless18
      @faultless18 Год назад +1

      I definitely noticed that! The coolant temp was 228 but dropped down to 221.
      From what I know it’s not suppose to stay in those temps for very long

    • @jimn.9990
      @jimn.9990 8 месяцев назад

      I had noticed that too (after Andre noted earlier that the oil temperature was at 250 F). I also noted that the Ford lacked an oil pressure guage. I can imagine with twin turbos operating in the Ford and pulling a heavy load uphill, I wouldn't be surprised to see the a temperature exceeding 275 F. Some turbos can generate heat up to a 1,000 F.

  • @bt4b4
    @bt4b4 3 года назад

    Yay ! Another classic video from the best ! Peacefrom510

  • @arnejahr3531
    @arnejahr3531 2 года назад

    Another great review on two very good trucks

  • @moparmuscle278
    @moparmuscle278 3 года назад +66

    Run the 2021 coyote engine in the Ford with a similar rear end ratio as the Ram to make for a better comparison. That would be more interesting to see.

    • @justin6296
      @justin6296 3 года назад +4

      Exactly

    • @T410ce
      @T410ce 2 года назад +9

      Can you get the coyote in a hybrid of any type? Isn’t this sort of a mild hybrid comparison?

    • @joe1071
      @joe1071 2 года назад +1

      Don't see the comparison as both of these are hybrid and the coyote is not. What am I missing here?

    • @moparmuscle278
      @moparmuscle278 2 года назад

      @@joe1071 Ram is not a full Hybrid like the Ford. The 5.7 with etorque is just a regular 5.7 with a belt assist small electric drive that only works for the first one or two wheel revolutions from a dig. There is no RAM Hybrid to compare to the Ford currently.

    • @joe1071
      @joe1071 2 года назад

      @@moparmuscle278 I understand they are not the same type of hybrid, however the ram is more of a hybrid that the coyote

  • @mikem4259
    @mikem4259 3 года назад +3

    I love this channel! you guys do a great job. im trying to decide between a Dodge Ram, and a ford f150. ive been leaning dodge for a while now, and after watching a few of these vids, ive pretty much got in mind what I wanna get. great work.

    • @Lizzbird_
      @Lizzbird_ 3 года назад +3

      Fords are very reliable and can last for many years even decades when under great care.

    • @johnmoses4124
      @johnmoses4124 3 года назад +6

      You would hands down not regret a ram.

    • @Ashley-vi3by
      @Ashley-vi3by Год назад

      @@Lizzbird_ ya right, oil guzzling engine rattling clunky transmission ford junk

    • @Ashley-vi3by
      @Ashley-vi3by Год назад +1

      @John Moses I agree, had a f150 5.0 oil burning engine, the replaced it 2 times and still was eating oil, sold it and bought a new ram and cannot believe the difference in quality

    • @donnysmith7162
      @donnysmith7162 6 месяцев назад

      Go drive them like I did unbiased and the Ram is so much nicer driving! Hemi power never gets old and no turbos to go out around 100,000 miles or quad cams failing! Go talk to Ford mechanics and they will tell you go 5.0!

  • @beaudean723
    @beaudean723 4 месяца назад

    This was a GREAT VID!!!

  • @Jason_Shave
    @Jason_Shave 3 года назад +5

    Really missed the Ike Gauntlet series. Andre looked crushed at the results 🤣🤣. I recently sold my Ram 1500 Limited for a 2500 due to that rear end ratio and payload. Put bigger tires on the truck and it gets much worse. The Fords are impressive and the interiors are starting to come along nicely. Love the competition!!

  • @larryshaw8677
    @larryshaw8677 3 года назад +5

    So I’m a ford guy currently running a 3.5 eco boost the engine is incredible for power but under a load tends to get thirsty , however has power to spare. I would buy the ford any ways.

  • @NukePooch1
    @NukePooch1 3 года назад +108

    Andre, any chance of you running your truck with the same load? I'd like to see if there's much of a difference in MPG in a proper truck without 1000 lbs of vibrating seats, LOL.

    • @HerrPoopschitz
      @HerrPoopschitz 3 года назад +21

      Curious of interior noise levels between the xl and platinum as well...

    • @keithbraddehmann320
      @keithbraddehmann320 3 года назад +5

      Yes! I would be curious to see the results as well.

    • @zelenizub2036
      @zelenizub2036 3 года назад

      @@HerrPoopschitz truck is supposed to be noise.

    • @rdbjr52
      @rdbjr52 2 года назад +2

      Happy wife happy life. My wife loves the comfort of the Platinum package. We spend so much time on the road, travel comfort warrants serious consideration…specially for us older folks.

  • @DSeely0902
    @DSeely0902 3 года назад

    Great vid. Looking forward to the 2500 Cummins Ike.

    • @zelenizub2036
      @zelenizub2036 3 года назад

      1500 lb payload, what is there to look? Ram waste of an great engine.

    • @gasolinediesel972
      @gasolinediesel972 3 года назад +1

      @@zelenizub2036 That's the minimum payload... It can go higher. The max with the diesel is 3100 lbs.

  • @DennisFolsom
    @DennisFolsom 2 года назад +1

    I used to be a Ford man, but I love my 2020 Ram. BTW, my Quad cab Bighorn 1500 has the 3.73 axle, and no hybrid system. It has more payload than this test truck. Pleased to see the Ram won the contest. I enjoy your Ike Gauntlet tests. Keep them Coming.

    • @Saku19
      @Saku19 Год назад

      How's it holding up?

  • @juancarraballo9731
    @juancarraballo9731 3 года назад +12

    FORD 🚚 all day every day 💯 & thanx for the video guys

  • @wvcorvetteman
    @wvcorvetteman 3 года назад +11

    My 2021 Ram has the 3.92 diff and is rated to tow 11,000. Wished Ram had sent one of those. Makes me wonder why they didn't send a 3.92 :(

  • @codysmith9813
    @codysmith9813 2 года назад +1

    I had a 2020 Ram laramie just like the ram tested here, great truck. If you press the + or - on the steering wheel it will show you which gear your in plus you can change down gearing that way or hold on a certain gear.

    • @brianxhell
      @brianxhell Год назад +1

      I'm looking at getting a 2020 Laramie Longhorn.

    • @codysmith9813
      @codysmith9813 Год назад

      @@brianxhell There expensive

  • @jaylangenstein9850
    @jaylangenstein9850 3 года назад +1

    Good to see Mr. Truck back at it.

  • @triedproven9908
    @triedproven9908 3 года назад +12

    Twin turbos under boosting under load are thirsty. +100hp -2mpg.
    I'll have the ford and probably live to regret the service interval.

  • @YTSBryce
    @YTSBryce 3 года назад +10

    All I can think of with that intro is
    "WELCOME TO OFF THE RANCH!!"

  • @christophercadena1133
    @christophercadena1133 3 года назад

    Good to see you Mr. Truck!

  • @thomasn428
    @thomasn428 2 года назад

    Great as always! :-)

  • @JOVANI7919
    @JOVANI7919 3 года назад +4

    Under load the turbo engines require a much richer air to fuel mixture. City or highway driving is where the EB shines. Under load you cant beat the MPG you get with "city" driving on an EB.

  • @seansaxon641
    @seansaxon641 3 года назад +5

    Do the manufacturers ever reach out to you to explain what seems like a failure on the part of their vehicles? Or would they offer an alternative mode for running something like this Ike Gauntlet?

  • @ocaceres86
    @ocaceres86 3 года назад +2

    Very interesting result. Row mode doesn’t let the truck shut the motor off for electric driving which I would assume would make a massive different on the downhill portion. Is it not safe to drive it in “Eco” or “Normal” mode at least for the downhill portion? Gotta figure the 3.73 axle hurt it mostly though...

  • @SGTEdwards2008
    @SGTEdwards2008 3 года назад

    Good job on the towing test. Seem the state has finally open if you having that much traffic there. Here in South California traffic (despite the double gas price) is almost back to normal though were not officially open yet :P
    I've seen 3 previous gens Chevy, Ford and Ram's running the Ike from TFL and I can tell I'm not surprised Ford loosing on the MPG once again, Small Engines with Big Turbos will eat more gas than any normal aspirated engines once they get pushed, this is the price for higher acceleration no matter what tricks you add to the engine. My money always goes to the beefy V8 engines normal aspirated or a Cummins Diesel engines hands down on any truck you use to tow.
    You don't need a cheap race truck just to end broken fast, you want a truck that can get you from point A and B for the long run safely. Now you want a Lamborghini race truck then by all means get the Ram TRX (if you have the money) for the smiles per gallon now that is beast of a truck both on-road/off-road and also gets 8.3 mpg on the towing haaahaa :) ruclips.net/video/MiNWakn9Pyw/видео.html

  • @timcartwright4679
    @timcartwright4679 3 года назад +43

    That 3.5 under boost is the equivalent of a 7L V8.... so not a mystery, especially to anyone who owns one.

    • @samsonreynolds3728
      @samsonreynolds3728 3 года назад +7

      A weak 7.0L

    • @DoctorMotorcycle
      @DoctorMotorcycle 3 года назад +12

      @@samsonreynolds3728 A weak 7L? It has 470ft-lbs without the electric motor, and 510 in the Raptor. Ford 7.3 godzilla is 475 ft lbs.C6 Z06 LS7 has 470 ft lbs, LS7 is not a weak engine lol, nor is the ecoboost.

    • @everythingpnw
      @everythingpnw 3 года назад +4

      @@DoctorMotorcycle Yeah, and it has needs two turbos to make that power. Take that away and it’s a tacoma. Add the turbos to a V8 and find out what happens.

    • @Steve-yr5vi
      @Steve-yr5vi 3 года назад +14

      @@everythingpnw and you think that's a good argument why?

    • @rebelcitysports1outlook713
      @rebelcitysports1outlook713 3 года назад +3

      @@DoctorMotorcycle 430 HP/570 lb-ft TQ for the Powerboost.

  • @Rich-mb6bw
    @Rich-mb6bw 3 года назад +8

    Ram has a 33 gallon fuel tank option and a 3.92 rear end option. Just to help out Andre.

    • @gregford6618
      @gregford6618 3 года назад

      thank you! I was fixing to type the same comment.

  • @pernell4351
    @pernell4351 3 года назад

    Wow I was not expecting those numbers.

  • @jameskyle2238
    @jameskyle2238 3 года назад +2

    was the tow/haul mode activated during the Ram's run?

  • @michatvrider
    @michatvrider 3 года назад +10

    $70 k for a half ton truck = WTF

    • @trenton.tchannel1810
      @trenton.tchannel1810 3 года назад

      For the high trims that normal . Tahoes and Expeditions are in that price range to

    • @driximus
      @driximus 3 года назад +1

      Yah prices are getting pretty stupid high.

  • @stgibson2810
    @stgibson2810 3 года назад +12

    I have a 2009 Ram 1500 with 240k miles and I love that truck. To this day it will still get 21mpg highway. But the itch became too great and I just bought a 2021 Ram 6.4/8 speed. It’s a beast and dollar for dollar I don’t think there’s a better truck on the market.

    • @paulsegura4759
      @paulsegura4759 3 года назад

      6.2l and 7.3l Ford v8’s are way better than that gutless 6.4 Hemi. I’ve never seen a truck pull in 1st gear up the Ike until the 6.4 laughing joke. Watch the 8speed pull the truck still drops down into 2nd gear 😹

    • @stgibson2810
      @stgibson2810 3 года назад +3

      @@paulsegura4759 I see you’ve succumbed to the marketing wars between the brands and base your opinions off that. Here’s the truth, most people who buy gasser heavy duty trucks buy them for low maintenance costs and occasional moderate weight towing. If you actually purchased a gas 2500 to max it out and pull it up the Rocky Mountains I would call you a complete dumb ass. 12 years ago Ram (Dodge back then) shifted their focus on 1500s and gasser trucks to make them comfortable and family oriented because everybody and their brothers were buying cross overs and SUVs. Now you get insanely nice interiors, tv screens on your dashes, fantastic ride quality, next level technology in a pick up truck, and guess who followed suit? Oh yeah, Chevy and Ford because they noticed a massive portion of the market shifting towards Rams, and current projections show Ram overtaking Ford in the next 6 years, they sometimes flip flop with Chevy for 2nd (this is according to their shareholder projections). So my truck’s capability far exceeds anything I’ll ever need to do, I get good mileage (for a 2500) and the interior is hands down better than anything Ford or Chevy offer for the same money, and I think the exterior is the best but that’s debatable, obviously. So if I cared about towing 20,000 pounds up a mountain, I would have bought a Cummins. Which is bar none the best diesel engine on the market today hence why 90% of privatized transport companies use Ram 3500 Cummins. But yeah, maybe next year Ford will increase the 7.3’s towing capacity by 100 pounds making them the leader in that segment and then you’ll have all the reason in the world to buy one! Good luck mate!

    • @cbake9440
      @cbake9440 2 года назад

      6.4 hemi👎🏻

    • @LPMojoGL
      @LPMojoGL 2 года назад

      Any issues with the Ram over that 240k miles? Looking at trading my Wrangler in for a pickup, F150 and Ram top choices.

    • @stgibson2810
      @stgibson2810 2 года назад +2

      @@LPMojoGL I mean yeah, any gas engine with that many miles is going to show it’s age. The truck still fires up and runs good but I can tell it’s losing compression so the top end probably needs a rebuild which is something I won’t be doing to it hence my new truck. Besides that a couple minor things, but all in all it’s the best vehicle I’ve ever owned.

  • @JamesDornbos
    @JamesDornbos 3 года назад

    Great matchup!

  • @royweatherford64
    @royweatherford64 2 года назад +2

    I purchased the power boost about 5 days ago and the only concern I have is at low speed it feels like there’s a shift kit when shifting gears . This only happens when it starts running off of the electric motor and the gas engine starts . Other than that the truck is more than I expected, it’s definitely the fastest stock vehicle I’ve been in in a long time . I haven’t even been through a tank of gas and I’m averaging 18+ mpg but I’ve had a heavy foot since I bought it .

    • @rustbeltrobclassic2512
      @rustbeltrobclassic2512 10 месяцев назад

      it's so hard to have self control, i have a powerboost too and it's a rocket..

    • @mcmuskie2563
      @mcmuskie2563 6 месяцев назад

      There’s a good chance it’s shifting hard until it gets to know you…crazy, but true.

  • @prestondeters5093
    @prestondeters5093 3 года назад +13

    Those oil temps are exactly why you should run full synthetic oils in these engines and really any modern engines. They run much hotter than the older engines.

    • @LA_Commander
      @LA_Commander 3 года назад +1

      That is a very good point. Also change the oil more often especially if you have a turbocharger or supercharger.

    • @prestondeters5093
      @prestondeters5093 3 года назад +1

      @@LA_Commander I would be constantly checking the oil and changing it quite often if my oil was running at 275°F. That's extremely hot. The interesting thing was that the coolant temperature didn't rise much. Makes me think it needs another separate oil cooler or better flow of coolant through the entire engine to transfer more heat to that fluid.

  • @DetroitMuscle313
    @DetroitMuscle313 3 года назад +31

    buy a V8 and SAVE THE PLANET !!!!

  • @alwoo
    @alwoo 2 года назад +1

    Thanks for your content. I've watched a lot of your videos. I'm new to the diesel truck life and I'd like to see a video on the proper way to drive a diesel truck especially when towing a 5th wheel up and down mountain roads. I just brought a 2021 tradesmen 3500 dually and would like to know the best way to navigate the mountain. Thank you

  • @scottjohnson943
    @scottjohnson943 3 года назад

    I have a previous generation Ram Longhorn - we tow our 6500 lb travel trailer all over the country with it - at least 15+ trips at over 1500 miles each over the last 6 years. I have the HEMI with the 3.91 gear ratio though, not the 3.21. Zero issues… and considering this test is an eco-optimized Ram vs the F-150 and the finish times were identical…. As for fuel economy, I wouldn’t be surprised that the F150 suffered, I get about 16 +/- on the highway with my Ram vs the eco-ratio will be more like 20-21, so the hit is pretty significant. Then again, I can cruise up 6% grades of over 10 miles long with a 6500 lb trailer shaped like a clipper sail behind me and never drop below 65 - and I know you would have some issues with the 3.21 doing that. Towing a flatbed with a pickup on it or some 6 foot-tall cargo trailer around is a lot easier than 101” by 12 foot tall RVs..
    The weight distribution hitch on that Ram looked like garbage or was setup wrong.. I use 800 lb spring bars for the 800 lb tongue weight on my trailer and it evenly lowers the Ram about 2” on front & back, and then the air-ride levels it back to normal. If it was squatting like that, something was seriously wrong, or the air-ride was left in tire-jack mode or something.
    We are moving up to a 3500 w/ the HO Cummins dually next year for the 24,000 lb fifth wheel we are buying, comparing price/equip - I have started looking at that, and I prefer the Ram and the Denali HD options over the higher-priced Fords in the 1-ton world as well.

  • @vonJaerschky
    @vonJaerschky 2 года назад +3

    Incredible the difference in payload between 1/2 ton trucks. The door sticker on my 2018 F150 Lariat says 1815lbs compared to this Ram's 1010lbs. That's a HUGE difference. 805 lbs, or 79% more than the Ram!

    • @dankruger2890
      @dankruger2890 Год назад

      i wonder how much ford adds to there numbers

    • @deltaecho9584
      @deltaecho9584 Год назад

      Ford can't touch that RAM for best ride or anything else if you do not tow on a regular basis.
      I have a RAM/HEMI and have put a few basic mods on it -- added increases in H.P. and Torq. I also add some "Lucas" octane boost to the 91 octane gas; these few things make a noticeable difference.

  • @hugokatz
    @hugokatz 3 года назад +4

    I've driven identical RAM 1500s back to back, 3.21 vs 3.92 rear end. The 3.92 transformed the truck. Even my grandkids immediately proclaimed the 3.92 geared truck the best and fastest. It was just peppier at all speeds and even part throttle. If you don't mind giving up a little mpg the get the 3.92, you're definitely going to feel the difference. There's a reason all the drag racers use lower gearing. With the overdriven ratios the great shifting 8 speed
    Torque Flight it is a joy to drive. Make sure you get a limited slip differential as well. If I were buying a used Truck the first thing I'd do is put a set of gears with either a limited slip differential or a Torsen. Having a closed differential is very important for handling, especially with an empty pick-up. It will keep your inside wheel from spinning in wet weather.

  • @Sam-pu7nz
    @Sam-pu7nz 2 года назад

    Andrey is an awesome host. Love the show!

  • @bostondan77
    @bostondan77 2 года назад

    Love Andres ‘s acting skills when found Mr. Truck sleeping 🤣

  • @jasonbrushett3
    @jasonbrushett3 3 года назад +12

    I think the results may be closer if two similar rear axle ratios were used? Both great trucks for sure......both really competent.Maybe a test involving no towing to compare fuel mileage?

    • @berowawa3907
      @berowawa3907 3 года назад +4

      Well the ford use less two cylinder and Hybrid it should have done better and two more gear
      The 10 speed should have fixed the difference

    • @jasonbrushett3
      @jasonbrushett3 3 года назад

      liberty because most truck owners today dont carry anything other than family members

  • @carguyg35
    @carguyg35 3 года назад +5

    I would love to see a truck tested with different gear ratios. Try and get two mostly identical trucks but one with the 3.21 and one with the 3.91 rear end for example. See the economy difference towing and unloaded. Plus how the driving characteristics change.

    • @acdii
      @acdii 3 года назад +1

      With the 8 and 10 speed transmissions it won't matter much at all, the computer will select the proper gear for each, end result will be about the same. Only thing that will be noticed is the initial acceleration. Compare a 6 speed to the 10 speed and then you will see a difference. 3.55 with the 10 speed has a lower 1st ratio than the 3.73 with the 6 speed. It will be faster off the line due to final drive ratio. Look up the ratio comparison charts Ford 6 speed vs 10 speed and Ram 6 vs 8. These new transmission make final ratios moot.

    • @johnpeters9793
      @johnpeters9793 2 года назад +2

      @@acdii
      Somebody that actually understands that there's a transmission in the equation....thank you!!
      All the dummies crying about not running the 3.92 must not have watched the video.....the ram was already running a higher RPM than the higher numerically geared ford to pull the hill, obviously in a lower transmission gear....(the Ford was in 7th @ 1:1.)
      All the the 3.92's would have done is allow a higher trans gear while under way.....rpms would have been the same.
      Like you wrote,, It would probably have allowed quicker off the line acceleration, but since both trucks hit the max speed limit and had near identical overall times, the 3.92's would have made zero difference.

  • @greggb681
    @greggb681 3 года назад

    Love both of those trucks!

  • @KIDRR
    @KIDRR 3 года назад +1

    Ike Gauntlet is the best videos you guys do