The Fast Lane Truck First Which brand will take you to 300,000 thousand miles with the least amount of money in repairs. I already know the answer.. Second who in the hell would buy a Nissan?!?!!
For all of those concerned about the longevity of the EcoBoost I work at a for dealer and we have put less than 5 turbos on and a hand full of injectors and that was all on gen 1 ecoboost the reall issues we see are some timing chain stretch and VCT noise which the VCT noise is usually covered under warranty and they have fix the issue after 2018 and some have oil leaks at the plastic oil pan. We have never had a catastrophic engine failure and we have had many get traded in with 200000 mile on them . All I'm saying is I have yet to see the insides of 3.5 ecoboost and i personally have seen the insides of 10 5.0l so in my opion the EcoBoost is the most reliable engine in the for line up
I’m saying man… everybody claims that there’s more reports on them than the 5.0 yet they don’t realize the ecoboost probably outsells the 5.0 7:1 lol I got 105,000 miles on mine and not a single issue 🙏🏽
Aw no Tundra. Thanks for at least letting us know why it wasn’t there! Honestly you probably can’t go wrong with any of these trucks. They’re all so capable and well made.
your not just wrong your super wrong...some of these trucks are made in Mexico and WILL have major problems due to build quality...plus new vehicles are NOT made to last with all that touch screen BS and dated electronic junk...yes i said dated, just think of 20 year old technology today, you would have a Gateway Fax machine in a car from 1998
stickloaf Parts in new vehicles are engineered to be as cheap as possible without sacrificing too much rigidity and strength. I'm unsure which one will be most reliable in the long run. My bets would probably be on the Titan or Tundra. Realistically though I'd probably take the GMC.
The 2.7 eco boost is a nice motor too. They did a video with the 2.7 L against the 3.5L ecoboost they were neck and neck! I have a ram but I definitely like the fords that gonna be my next truck
@@thatmaverickguy859 - Good for you, seriously.. glad you didn't have an issue. I think most people have issues and don't know they do. They think rattle on start up is normal.
Based on how close the 5.0 was to the ecoboost, I’m thinking if it had the 3.55 rear end it would have matched it and the 3.73 would have taken it. Obviously you could spec the ecoboost the same way, but I find it interesting. So far that ten speed coyote is the only motor to make the ecoboost think twice about racing if they were Apple to Apple options.
@@user-sv3yr2jd3z Yup I just got mine tuned on E85 and it makes 420 to the wheels now. That’s from 330 stock to 420 with just tune. The eco boost is solid for bolt on and tune. But that’s max, the coyote will handle forced induction in anyway
@@user-sv3yr2jd3z you will have to keep your “man” card in your shirt pocket because it will take everything in your wallet and then some to put a whipple on it
@@paulhunter9613 I don't even own an f150. I own a powerstroke puts more hp to the tire than 99.9% of any ecoboost out there. A Whipple 5.0 is penny's compared to building a diesel and a big factor in why I'm considering switching. The ecoboost is not capable of doing what I want the 5.0 is. It is so much more than the ecoboost, better in every way. Even ford who pushed ecoboost with everything in them finally seen the light. They got curb stomped by the TRX. What engine did they fight back with? Not a lame 6 cylinder.
My two friends were racing this one time Dodge Charger vs Mustang GT when the light turned green they went, they said there was a white Ford F-150 that raced with them as well and for some reason the truck was pulling away and they couldn’t catch up to it and were left baffled. It all makes sense now, twin turbo ecoboost oh man! 🤙
No surprise on that outcome, 3.5 smokes them all, even more so towing. Worst mistake I made was trying to go back to an na V8 after owning ecoboost trucks, that lasted less than a year before I was in another ecoboost. EcoBoost or diesel engines (turbo) from here on out
Not this owner of a 2016 3.5L Ecoboost. (I've got the 3.55 rear end as well). I drive mine in Sport Mode all the time. But I blow everybody off the line. I get 50 yards ahead before most people clear the the intersection. And the funny thing is, you don't even have to punch it. Just about a quarter throttle gets it going pretty good. I get up to 100 mph in no time at all.
190k on my 2012 3.5. Over half the miles towing 5 to 6 thousand pound box trailer. No problem at all pulling in the mountains in colorado. I'll definitely be getting another. Timing chain rattles if I let the oil go over 4k but this truck has made me a shit ton of money and put a smile on my face doing it.
Brian... Absolutely! That's the race I want to see as well! Judging by how damn close the 5.0 was to the Ecoboost, I think it would beat the larger V8s. TFL please make it happen.
They need to get a more proper equipped 5.0, the 3.15 axle ratio is pretty lousy and the weakest available. With 3.55 or 3.73 the Coyote is way faster.
without watching the video and looking at you name and the level of butt hurt, I know who won. But given your argument, lets imagine the F-150 also had more cylinders and displacement.
TFL Team... Out-Freak'in-Standing! This was exactly what I wanted to see. After reading the comments, a few of us want to see a race JUST between the V8s. It's a given the Ecoboost would come out on top. However, judging how close the 5.0 finished to the 3.5, I think the smaller V8 would take down the RAM and GM. Please make that happen. P.S.- Thanks for choosing to work on these videos verses covering the SEMA event. I'm in the market for a truck and these contests were extremely useful. TLF continues to set the bar. Thanks.
@@andrewl.9736 These trucks are made to be quiet for a more comfortable ride. Put a nice aftermarket exhaust of your choice on the 6.2L and it'll sound just as great as any other truck.
I knew it too because these guys are Ford fan boys and their test are always have Ford winning to bad it is fake .My hemi has never lost to a Ford ecojunk.
My buddy ordered his Tundra 5.7L from the factory with the TRD supercharger making 504 HP and 550 ft lbs tq. It will *MURDER* even tuned 3.5L ecoboosts. Everybody likes to ignore the fact that you can order a Tundra from the factory with the TRD (Toyota Racing Development) supercharger, complete with factory warranty intact.
It would've been interesting to see how the little 2.7 EcoBoost compared. You guys posted a video a while back and reported how the F150 with the 2.7 was the quickest truck you ever tested. I'm pretty sure it's the most popular engine choice too.
When i became the sun.. people like what they like and will defend it without question, points can be argued all day but for what, if people like the Ford they will buy it, if people like the gmc they will buy it and so on, truth be told they are all disposable piles of tin foil at this point but cost as much as a house so no thanks, I will stick to motorcycles if I need a truck I can borrow one
Everyone said chevy around me but i bought FORD-150. In my opinion made the best choice. Comfy roomie, tech industed, great speakers, great towing. I just love it all
I dont know about blowing but v6 turbos are future. 2.7 , 3.5 L no matter what. Technology have changed the game. I dont have 5.0 🤠 but 2.7L but trust me. Its way better then what i expected.
I recently traded in my F250 with a 5.4 Triton V8 and got the F-150 with the 3.5 L twin turbo. It's an exceptional truck. The torque is just phenomenal in all kinds of conditions. Over the last few years the 3.5 twin turbo has been getting better and more reliable. Overall the 3.5 EcoBoost is the way to go. I love the V8 sound I love the traditional V8 Rumble but when you're spending that much money for a truck it needs to be able to do everything I needed to do. And that V8 just sucks the gas twice as much as the 3.5 V6.
I have a 2017 with the 3.5 Ecoboost. I have 143,000 miles on it. I’ve had zero problems. Recently I drove from Baltimore to Richmond and back. I drove the speed limit in the right lane. I got 29.1 MPG round trip. That’s crazy for such a big vehicle with the aerodynamics of a billboard.
I had a 3.5 twin screw, ridiculous torque, never a problem mechanically, but ran hot pulling my 9500lb trailer up Utah mountain passes in the summer. I now have the 5.0 coyote, haven't towed with it yet but daily driving it's averaging 4-5 mph higher than my 3.5 eco ever did.
InnerGuide. Nothing official from ford itself. There is unofficial f150 from Hennessy and Roush. But they all cost $90k plus. Some are all about performance on the street. Some around making the raptor look slow not as off road worthy.
@@olivierr.5752 Quite a bit. One mile above sea level puts the oxygen density to be less reducing natural aspirated engines by 15 to 20% power. the eco boost having 2 turbos makes up for that to some degree.
@@jldude84 I disagree after looking at the drive ratios for each transmission in each truck. Nissan may have a taller first gear, but both Ford and GM have more power oriented drive ratios in the middle of the transmission. A 3.15 or 3.31 axle ratio between these trucks will have a noticeable advantage over other competitors. I think the reason why the Nissan can hang is because the VK56VD maintains a pretty good torque/hp curve.
What if they compared apples to apples, top of the line 2019 Denali vs 2019 f150 limited with 450 hp and 510 tq. Then the 6.2 would look even sillier than it did
@@CGF1214 You act like the coyote is slow! They are so close in power it is barely noticeable. I gaurantee there would be less than a half a truck length between these trucks if they both had the same gears. 5.0 lost by 1 length and 3.15 gears when the ecoboost had 3.31.
Hey fellas, I just bought my ideal truck, a 2019 Ram 1500 Laramie Sport. You guys played a big role in my research and helping me come to my decision. So I want to say thank you for that.
Well I have a 2018 5.0L with 3.73 rear end.... My buddy has a 2013 5.7 RAM with only 35,000kms and the 5.0 smokes it in a race.... I have no experience against a newer RAM, but at least my buddy has to keep quiet about his big fancy HEMI haha!
CloneTrooper55 Gaming I’m not sure what the rear end in the HEMI is.... And I say 35,000kms because my F150 has 5,000kms and it’s not like I’m racing a 5 year old RAM with 250,000kms on it.... Just pointing out that’s it’s got low kms.
Although I wouldn't buy a v-6 powered truck, I have to hand it to Ford for having the fastest and most capable truck on the market. And now they are offering the high output engine from the raptor? It's going to be eating trucks for breakfast. I love your video guys and thank you for always keeping us up to date, great job!
@@slydog75bc most of us truck owner/drivers don't look into buying a truck for efficiency or to save gas. I will never drive anything less than a v-8 on a pick up and gladly wave the ecoboost engine trucks past me cause they will never sound as good mine does, plus a supercharger would fix that real quick without sacrificing the sound.
@@roniebonilla8611 lol at the supercharger combo. You'd go spend an additional 8-10 grand just to keep up with a ecoboost. And heaven forbid the eco owner goes aftermarket turbos and tune. The HO 3.5 makes 455/510. Imagine what that will be with a good tune. Most truck owners aren't going to justify spending close to ten grand extra just to beat a factory truck configuration. I own a 2014 f150 5.0, and it's a turd compared to the new 5.0, which is a turd compared to the ecoboost. I get that truck guys love the v8 sound. But sound doesn't do any work. I towed a trailer and car to Georgia and back, and got out accelerated up a massive grade by an ecoboost f150 pulling a gigantic camper trailer. I was struggling at 45 in 3rd and he went by me like I was sitting still.
For people who want a product that’s ready to go the F-150 is a great truck. For guys like me who modify and want room to build they’re a bad buy. Turbo’s or not I’m not buying a pickup with a 6 cylinder in it.
No complaints, just wish they'd have had turbos on all the trucks. Forced vs natural aspiration isn't a fair race, the turbos on that 3.5 give it 75% of its hp lmao
Trucks have come so far over the years. The difference between a truck from today and only ten years ago is night and day. They have improved so much it's hard to believe. Auto manufacturers have been in such intense competition in recent that they have pushed one another to exceed most imaginations. We love these FRIENDLY competitions because at the end of the day the real winners are all of us the consumers.
Just drove home my new Sierra AT4 from Minnesota to Chicago Suburbs yesterday. What a nice ride. Put the thing in sport mode and with the 6.2L it rockets off the line.
Truthfully I don't buy trucks to win drag races ... I buy them to work , haul , tow , pull , and be safe in ... my 97- F150 4.6 5 speed with 258,000 miles has had the crap used out it , and still runs & drives great . Good luck with that twin turbo engine holding tight after 100,000 miles. If you want to see something interesting and get down to brass tacks , disable the turbos and run it natural aspiration then see what it can do , probably won't pull the hat off the top of your head !! It's a Good thing I didn't get rid of my ole Ford after losing a few races against my friends trucks , I would've missed out on one of the best workhorses I've ever owned !! Don't get me wrong I'm not dissing it , I'm a Ford guy , but I give credit where it's due & putting twin turbos on a small displacement engine with a truck with a barrage of lightweight aluminum alloy pieces is very innovative , but I'll trade all that for a heavy sure-footed solid safe truck getting 16MPG with no worries about it flying apart before 200K miles !! Peace Out !! -WM
While your '97 may be made of steel and appear "solid" because of it, don't let that fool you into believing the 10th Gen trucks were/are any more sturdy, or safe than any generation built after them. Have you ever seen the amount of frame and body flex on a 10th Gen F150? How about their crash ratings? They were absolutely dismal for their time. If you pit any 10th Gen F150 against a current 13th Gen, it would lose badly in every conceivable category. Yes, they're pricey and yes they're complex....but that's simply a reflection of the industry and inflation adjustment. Not to mention options found on a full blown Lariat of the 90's era can be had on even the most basic of models today. Don't let nostalgia, ignorance and personal bias get in the way of cold hard facts when it comes to making an "informed" decision. As far as engine choice goes. The Ecoboost isn't for everyone. Despite the unarguable superiority of the package itself, some guys just "need" to hear that V8 growl under hood when they press the loud pedal. Heck...I'm one of them...but I recognise that I'm giving up a "superior platform" for the sake of nostalgia and personal bias. That being the case....the Coyote is probably the best V8 Ford (or most any manufacturer for that matter) has built in the last 40-years.
My dad still has his 97 he bought off the lot, 358K and still going! Sure, you can somewhat tell the 4.6's age but no real motor problems. Only have had replace/re-machined heads after 250k(??) But still a very solid work truck.
I’m a Ford guy myself. I own a 07 5.4, and a 17 3.5. Fact is the 3.5 will out pull, out tow and still win a drag race than just about anything in its class, and it is a safer vehicle to boot.....
I go with and stay with what works my friend . Like I said , I'm a Ford guy thru and thru , and far from ignorant ... please believe that , so don't try to educate me , or take me to school so to speak , as far as trucks go , I've pulled , hauled , towed , stump jerked , hammered on , overworked pushed to the limit and bent Fords , Chevy , Dodges , Jeeps , etc ... if you've done the same , Welcome to the Working Man's Real World Country Cub . Yes , the Coyote 5.0 is bad ass !! As is the old 300 - S6 Might be the only thing we agree on , other than that ..... You Say Tomoto ... Is Say Tomato !! Peace Out - MW
I had a 2012 EcoBoost f150 and it was a great truck, absolutely loved it. I recently traded in for a 2018 5.0 f150 and I loved so far both are great trucks. Ford FTW
To be honest, had the Titan had something like the ram had in the rear (3.92) it might have beat even the eco boost. I mean it held on against the gmc really closely but had a wayyy taller rear end ratio. That things a beast, and that’s coming from a ford guy lol.
@Ronald Worster How is it not stock? It's a vehicle built by a department within the company. All components are factory components, manufactured by Ford, with a full manufacturer's warranty. SVT is a division within Ford. Ford doesn't send it out to be modified. (Like Roush or Hennessey) I happened to see someone driving in a Roush modified Raptor, today. HOLY CRAP!!! Now THAT is not a stock vehicle, by any means. LOL
Yep, the 2.7 ecoboost is even quicker than its Big brother, the 3.5 in stock form. Once reprogrammed or upping the boost, the 3.5 becomes the winner over the 2.7 and both become miles ahead of any other truck in existence including any V8.
It’s only number one because GM does not want to let people know that chevy they are the same truck. So when someone buys a gmc and or a Chevy truck it’s the same one so if they added both those two company’s of how many they sold they will beat ford hands down from day one and they will be selling for over 42 years number 1.
No it's not... I have the 3.5EB gen2 and test drove both 3.5EB and 2.7EB prior to my purchase.... the 2.7 feels faster from the start but runs out of steam in high rpms.. the 3.5EB pulls harder with a longer meatier torque curve all the way to the redline.... which makes the 3.5EB quicker
I have had both, sold the 3.5.and I have a 2.7 now and stock this 2.7 truck is faster and that's a fact for sure. And I know it would beat my 2013 3.5L to 100 mph everytime. Just because the 3.5 has more.horse doesnt.mean it's a faster truck.
I'm a Chevy guy. But my buddy bought a brand new Ford F-150 and I knew before this even started that truck would win because when he took me for a drive in it that was one of the fastest vehicle's I've ever been in. I couldn't believe that thing had a v-6 in it. Blew my mind really.
2017 F150 3.5 Ecoboost 0-60 5.9 seconds 1/4 mile 14.5 seconds 2016 GMC Sierra Denali 6.2 0-60. 5.7 seconds 1/4 mile 14.1 seconds Moral of the story, the turbos retain horsepower and torque at elevation. Common real world scenario when not so high above sea level, all of the naturally aspirated trucks would be faster by quite a bit, and the GMC would have won. But if your are indeed in the mountains, the 3.5 F150 would be what you want for towing.
Jared Champagne, if you want to talk about souped up special vehicles, the Hennessey GMC Sierra HPE800 with 6.2 does 0-60 in 3.9 seconds and ¼ mile in 12.3 seconds @112mph. Neat huh!
Shawn Elliott the 5.0 ford had the same disadvantage as the rest of the trucks yet it was 2nd fastest. The only one with the advantage was the 3.5 ecoboost.
V6 twin turbo all the way baby! Long live the EcoBoosts mighty reign, GTR is a twin turbo V6 and they are up over 3000hp full mod. Wont be long and the 3.5 eco will have the aftermarket support to be deep into the 1000hp range... these F150s are killer. 6 bolt main, bossed in oil pan/girdle, rigid head design with great gasket clamping force. Delete the DI, big injectors and big boost let's go baby. My 13' is close to 500hp with basic bolt ons lol... glad my tail lights look so good for ya.
I eat dodges and fords trucks everyday I have a 2016 6.2 GMC sierra and it smokes them all........come get some and it's still stock! but a supercharger coming soon......
Imagine if they (the 2 Fords) ran a decent gear ratio in the rear end for this race???? The 3.15 and 3.31 are the two slowest rear-ends Ford makes. If they ran the 3.55 locker or the 3.73, it would have been even more embarrassing for the GM, Dodge and what ever else those were.
I own a 1999 f 250 turbo 7.3 L power stroke that i bought new and has 237,000 miles and has never been in shop except for tires and oil change. I will never buy another truck. I have an International harvester 1586 that weighs 18,000 pounds and it joyrides with it on the highway.
Love this episode… that being said I would love to see a 2022 version of this test??!!! Would be perfect now that the tundra and the Silverado are boosted and soon the ram will have the hurricane! Keep up the incredible work guys!! ❤️
2022 it's obviously just between lightning and the rivian. They aren't good at a lot of truck stuff but they are not going to get beat at drag racing by any combustion engine
I have a 2.7 ecoboost and having driven the coyote for a week I was not impressed. The 2.7 is faster. However I don't think any of the non turbos should even try to race any of the 3 ecoboosts. I would like to see the coyote against the other V8's.
Because everything here would shit all over the 5.3L. That engine has ZERO chance of even holding its ground against any of the trucks in this video except for maybe the naturally aspirated V6 Ram.
Lol that was my point Chevy had to send there big motor in to keep up with the others. The 5.3 is at the bottom of the barrel. Even ram sent a v6 knowing it wouldn’t do good but yet they still did it Chevy wouldn’t even send there 5.3
@@papyro8054 wrong dummy...the 5.3 is NOT "the bottom of the heap", the 5.3 is a very strong running motor for it's displacement. It puts out 350 horsepower and around the same in torque right off the lot. Chevrolet makes a 4.3 V6 and a 4.8 V8 and they're good strong motors. The ONLY reason Ford's 3.5 V6 is so strong is that it has TWO turbochargers!
Then why do they always send there 6.2 and not the 5.4 even ram sent a v6 along with there v8 and it does not have a turbo on it. Chevy always does this in all these tests. If they would of sent the 5.3 it would of came in last out of all the v8 models!
I'm a Ford guy but was actually surprised by this outcome. I'd of put my money on the 6.2 Sierra. It's a very good truck. They all are, almost. The v6 in the ram is a bit lacking in my opinion. I have the same engine in my Jeep and while my Jeep has plenty of power, it also doesn't have the weight of a full size truck. But hey, some people love that ram and that's ok.
Chevy has been trying to figure out a way to beat the ecoboost F150 since 2011 lol. I guess they're gonna buy some hellcat engines for their trucks next time...
Lmao if they wanted to beat it they put a supercharger on top, no one cares about a fast truck consumer reports show that. If you want something to go fast get a zr1 or a camaro. If your buying a truck for 0-60 your buying it for the wrong reason
isaiah the hillbilly lol! i bet it could pull the neighbors house down and then carry the houses remains in the bed though! trucks are for work not speed.
I wouldn't pick a turbo charged truck if i'm gonna put it to work they will ware out quickly but if i'm gonna use it for just a daily use like a regular car then it's okay
@@courtneyanderson2293 semi trucks run with diesel and not gas have you seen any diesel truck in this video or is this video about semi truck? Or can a half ton truck pull 40 tons like semi trucks? Your comment is pointless
That's what I want to see, the Ford 5.0 against the GMC 6.2. The 5.0 was close to the ecoboost, even with the granny rear axle ratio. I bet it could hang with the GMC 6.2
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
What's the best new American truck? Find out here with TFL's Expert Buyer's Guide: ruclips.net/video/1_vJh5jheaY/видео.html
The Fast Lane Truck First Which brand will take you to 300,000 thousand miles with the least amount of money in repairs. I already know the answer.. Second who in the hell would buy a Nissan?!?!!
The best never rest Ford
So these things will blast here in the Netherlands, below sea level 😎
wheres the chevy?
@@philllsxga.7737 A older 90s Chevy with a manual transmission.
I will become impressed
When any of them can out run
a recall.
Yeah, really
LMAO
Lmao!
Recalls are batting 1000%
Especially that ford.
"My torque wasn't torquing" ..... best comment I've ever heard.
Great video! Keep it up!
That was in the video
that's what she said
Does "E" Torque mean the rest of the Torque will come in an email?!
😂 😂
3-5 days business days
😐🔫
Savage 💀💀
The gmc and ram looked identical to how much they lost by against thhe EcoBoost. Nothing will beat a twin turbo at 6500 feet above sea level lol.
For all of those concerned about the longevity of the EcoBoost I work at a for dealer and we have put less than 5 turbos on and a hand full of injectors and that was all on gen 1 ecoboost the reall issues we see are some timing chain stretch and VCT noise which the VCT noise is usually covered under warranty and they have fix the issue after 2018 and some have oil leaks at the plastic oil pan.
We have never had a catastrophic engine failure and we have had many get traded in with 200000 mile on them .
All I'm saying is I have yet to see the insides of 3.5 ecoboost and i personally have seen the insides of 10 5.0l so in my opion the EcoBoost is the most reliable engine in the for line up
That's pretty interesting
I’m saying man… everybody claims that there’s more reports on them than the 5.0 yet they don’t realize the ecoboost probably outsells the 5.0 7:1 lol I got 105,000 miles on mine and not a single issue 🙏🏽
Thanks for posting. I'm a Mopar guy, but love boost😁
From a non bias opinion, I’d love to see this race done at sea level. At 5000+ DA the NA engines are down a lot of power.
Aw no Tundra. Thanks for at least letting us know why it wasn’t there!
Honestly you probably can’t go wrong with any of these trucks. They’re all so capable and well made.
Kchhibs not sure about the ram
your not just wrong your super wrong...some of these trucks are made in Mexico and WILL have major problems due to build quality...plus new vehicles are NOT made to last with all that touch screen BS and dated electronic junk...yes i said dated, just think of 20 year old technology today, you would have a Gateway Fax machine in a car from 1998
Agreed
stickloaf Parts in new vehicles are engineered to be as cheap as possible without sacrificing too much rigidity and strength. I'm unsure which one will be most reliable in the long run. My bets would probably be on the Titan or Tundra. Realistically though I'd probably take the GMC.
stickloaf the tiant and the f150 are built in the USA if I’m not mistaken
The 5.7 l hemi against the Nissan would be a race I would like to see.
The 2.7 eco boost is a nice motor too. They did a video with the 2.7 L against the 3.5L ecoboost they were neck and neck! I have a ram but I definitely like the fords that gonna be my next truck
Nissan with those highway gears hung in pretty good against the jimmy!
Shelter93 the 5.0 could take the hemi with no problem. The 5.6 Nissan vs the hemi would be a great race like you said
@@possummcdonald6388 a 5.0 would get slapped. Just less power.
ToAstYNaChO FYI the 5.0 has the same amount of power as the 5.7 hemi and the f150 lighter. Go be stupid somewhere else
I’ve had my ecoboost for 2 weeks. I still haven’t really gotten on it and it is still the quickest truck I’ve ever driven.
Turbos will do that to you lol. Gotta love a good turbo.
Nice. Watch them cam phasers. They tend to fail quite fast on those EcoBrokes.
@@truthkeeperfilms no they don't lol plenty of people in my family have had eco boost and we've had one for almost 6years and it's never had a issue
@@thatmaverickguy859 - Good for you, seriously.. glad you didn't have an issue. I think most people have issues and don't know they do. They think rattle on start up is normal.
@@truthkeeperfilms yeah it runs smooth and clean
I love my tacoma 4 banger, 159 raging hp and 5 gears that are way too far apart. All the gas pedal affects is the noise level 😂
And the 400k miles you can drive it for.
I love the skateboarding company hoodie, something my dad would have done unintentionally . Much respect :)
Based on how close the 5.0 was to the ecoboost, I’m thinking if it had the 3.55 rear end it would have matched it and the 3.73 would have taken it.
Obviously you could spec the ecoboost the same way, but I find it interesting.
So far that ten speed coyote is the only motor to make the ecoboost think twice about racing if they were Apple to Apple options.
Why are you surprised? The 5.0 has more hp but less torque. Makes it close BUT the ecoboost can get 100+ hp from a $500 tune sooo.
@@dn9418 the 5.0 makes 800hp with a Whipple and a warranty. You also get to keep your man card.
@@user-sv3yr2jd3z Yup I just got mine tuned on E85 and it makes 420 to the wheels now. That’s from 330 stock to 420 with just tune. The eco boost is solid for bolt on and tune. But that’s max, the coyote will handle forced induction in anyway
@@user-sv3yr2jd3z you will have to keep your “man” card in your shirt pocket because it will take everything in your wallet and then some to put a whipple on it
@@paulhunter9613 I don't even own an f150. I own a powerstroke puts more hp to the tire than 99.9% of any ecoboost out there. A Whipple 5.0 is penny's compared to building a diesel and a big factor in why I'm considering switching. The ecoboost is not capable of doing what I want the 5.0 is. It is so much more than the ecoboost, better in every way. Even ford who pushed ecoboost with everything in them finally seen the light. They got curb stomped by the TRX. What engine did they fight back with? Not a lame 6 cylinder.
I got an Ecoboost 3.5l with a 3:55 rear end. Thanks for the bragging rights.
me too!
Me too, I love my truck
Me too , everyone says it doesnt sound tough well listen and look at Mike Tyson!!!!
Supposedly the 2.7 is faster than the 3.5
My two friends were racing this one time Dodge Charger vs Mustang GT when the light turned green they went, they said there was a white Ford F-150 that raced with them as well and for some reason the truck was pulling away and they couldn’t catch up to it and were left baffled. It all makes sense now, twin turbo ecoboost oh man! 🤙
My two freinds saw bigfoot and a unicorn having sex lmao.
@@erics9754 lol
Roasted HD I have a 2017 2.7 eco boost and lemme tell you I’ve smoked mustangs to BMWs with this truck idk why so many people hate
No surprise on that outcome, 3.5 smokes them all, even more so towing. Worst mistake I made was trying to go back to an na V8 after owning ecoboost trucks, that lasted less than a year before I was in another ecoboost.
EcoBoost or diesel engines (turbo) from here on out
I had no idea how fast those Ford's were. Everyone around here drives their Ford's slow!
Not this owner of a 2016 3.5L Ecoboost. (I've got the 3.55 rear end as well). I drive mine in Sport Mode all the time. But I blow everybody off the line. I get 50 yards ahead before most people clear the the intersection. And the funny thing is, you don't even have to punch it. Just about a quarter throttle gets it going pretty good. I get up to 100 mph in no time at all.
@@WhatDayIsItTrumpDay just hope it dont break down had SHO 3.5 Turbos no parts still waiting 3 months
They have to because they'll fall apart.
I take car of my ford thats why i drive slow.
Watching all the slower trucks fly bye me in the fast lane. Lmfao
I had no idea how slow they were until I drove one and realised how slow it was.
Big smile on my face...love seeing my truck kicking some butt :)
190k on my 2012 3.5. Over half the miles towing 5 to 6 thousand pound box trailer. No problem at all pulling in the mountains in colorado. I'll definitely be getting another. Timing chain rattles if I let the oil go over 4k but this truck has made me a shit ton of money and put a smile on my face doing it.
can you do a drag race video with the 5.0 5.7 6.2 please
Brian... Absolutely! That's the race I want to see as well! Judging by how damn close the 5.0 was to the Ecoboost, I think it would beat the larger V8s. TFL please make it happen.
They need to get a more proper equipped 5.0, the 3.15 axle ratio is pretty lousy and the weakest available. With 3.55 or 3.73 the Coyote is way faster.
6.2 beats them... hes already done a video between the titan ram and chevy
bet the 5.0 could beat all of them
@@brianiannarelli1168 lmfao not a chance. My neighbor just traded his 16 5.0 on a 16 Chevy 6.2... there's no comparison... and I'm a ford guy
Imagine if you guys added the 2019 F150 Limited with the Raptor Motor in it...lol...Thanx for the cool video
Imagine every truck there with twin turbos!?
@@Rocksolidbullys well, GM does have a turbo 4. Just saying
DURAMAX_DELIGHT except you’re living in fantasy land, the 2019 Limited does have the 450hp/510lb-ft Raptor engine.
without watching the video and looking at you name and the level of butt hurt, I know who won. But given your argument, lets imagine the F-150 also had more cylinders and displacement.
DURAMAX_DELIGHT if they all had twin turbos the 5.0 would be on top but I know you’re a diesel man so it doesn’t really matter to you
TFL Team... Out-Freak'in-Standing! This was exactly what I wanted to see. After reading the comments, a few of us want to see a race JUST between the V8s. It's a given the Ecoboost would come out on top. However, judging how close the 5.0 finished to the 3.5, I think the smaller V8 would take down the RAM and GM. Please make that happen.
P.S.- Thanks for choosing to work on these videos verses covering the SEMA event. I'm in the market for a truck and these contests were extremely useful. TLF continues to set the bar. Thanks.
The 5.0 was lighter with it being 2wd
"Cousins, hopefully not kissing" lol!!
Nissan got the best growl from a basic tail pipe
Ryan Belden yeah I noticed in this video that was the only engine note that sounded good to me. Everything else was too muffled or weak.
Gmc was the most dissapointing. They've got a 6.2 with a wimpy little puff of an exhaust sound.
@@andrewl.9736 These trucks are made to be quiet for a more comfortable ride. Put a nice aftermarket exhaust of your choice on the 6.2L and it'll sound just as great as any other truck.
I have driven ever type of new truck and the titan definitely has the loudest grunt coming from the engine.
It sounds like a 4 cylinder rice can Honda civic. Gmc and ram have the deep v8 rumble
Great video...my 3.5 EcoBoost hasn't been beat yet! It's the real deal.
I think everyone already knew the ecoboost was going to take this easily.
I knew it too because these guys are Ford fan boys and their test are always have Ford winning to bad it is fake .My hemi has never lost to a Ford ecojunk.
Eric s which state you live in if South Carolina got one for ya
I live in Canada full of libtards out here but I love south Carolina.@@dominicanscuf1772
My buddy ordered his Tundra 5.7L from the factory with the TRD supercharger making 504 HP and 550 ft lbs tq. It will *MURDER* even tuned 3.5L ecoboosts. Everybody likes to ignore the fact that you can order a Tundra from the factory with the TRD (Toyota Racing Development) supercharger, complete with factory warranty intact.
Eric s that’s the biggest lie I’ve ever heard LMAOOOO
I’ve raced a 2.7 eco and 3.5 in my 6.2. I knew from the start that 3.5 was gonna take the cake all day long lol
That's why I Whipple supercharger my 6.2 and no more worries lol. Plenty of sad challengers too...
It would've been interesting to see how the little 2.7 EcoBoost compared. You guys posted a video a while back and reported how the F150 with the 2.7 was the quickest truck you ever tested. I'm pretty sure it's the most popular engine choice too.
Daniel Heller true, but that was with the 6-speed transmission. Since both ecoboosts use the 10 speed now, I think the 3.5 is a bit faster
It is the most popular engine... but is not quicker than the 3.5EB gen2
its only interesting to people that drive that terd. If your truck is not a v8 , you likely squat to pee
@@chaznad5411what happened a little eco boost whip your v8’s ass?
I traded my 2.7eco for a 3.5 eco and it's waaaaaay quicker
I like how everyone was saying that the other trucks would keep up with the ecoboost at sea level but the closest truck to it was the 5.0 f150....
The other trucks were 4x4. the two Fords were 2 wheel drive sooooo
Non Ya the ecoboost was 4x4 the coyote was a 2x4
@@quinnleverett4793 Why because it had tow hooks...had a 96 Dodge 3/4 2 wheel drive that had tow hooks
@@taylorswiftnumberon1 Negative....the Ecoboost was a 4X4. Don't go letting sour grapes get in the way of facts.
Non Ya no cause he literally said it was 4 wheel drive
Love all the google mechanics in the comments
No doubt...its entertaining....fierce loyalism...not sure why
When i became the sun.. people like what they like and will defend it without question, points can be argued all day but for what, if people like the Ford they will buy it, if people like the gmc they will buy it and so on, truth be told they are all disposable piles of tin foil at this point but cost as much as a house so no thanks, I will stick to motorcycles if I need a truck I can borrow one
@@Zonedout-sx1il 100 percent truth..they want to keep us financed for eternity!!
@@whenibecamethesun..8759 Yes, debt and you've become a slave to it.
@@oltob6707 me
I had a ford with the 3.5L ecoBoost and it was awesome. It was a great truck! And I can believe it would always win!
Everyone said chevy around me but i bought FORD-150. In my opinion made the best choice. Comfy roomie, tech industed, great speakers, great towing. I just love it all
Chris Muse sure it will be great till it blows up if it’s the boosted v6. If it’s the 5.0, nice choice that’s a great truck
I dont know about blowing but v6 turbos are future. 2.7 , 3.5 L no matter what. Technology have changed the game.
I dont have 5.0 🤠 but 2.7L but trust me. Its way better then what i expected.
Ford interior is cheap
James Fournier ☝️ agree. I am waiting for 2020 bronco. Hope its better in that.
"Ladies and Russians!" XD You guys make great videos, can't wait for more, especially more Ike Gauntlet! :-D
moral of the story, turbo everything!
Until it breaks down...
Moral of the story people are gullible and beleive anything they see on the internet.
If you can deal with the turbo lag
Turbo for power not for reliability.
Until heat soak kicks in...
I recently traded in my F250 with a 5.4 Triton V8 and got the F-150 with the 3.5 L twin turbo. It's an exceptional truck. The torque is just phenomenal in all kinds of conditions. Over the last few years the 3.5 twin turbo has been getting better and more reliable. Overall the 3.5 EcoBoost is the way to go. I love the V8 sound I love the traditional V8 Rumble but when you're spending that much money for a truck it needs to be able to do everything I needed to do. And that V8 just sucks the gas twice as much as the 3.5 V6.
I have a 2017 with the 3.5 Ecoboost. I have 143,000 miles on it. I’ve had zero problems. Recently I drove from Baltimore to Richmond and back. I drove the speed limit in the right lane. I got 29.1 MPG round trip. That’s crazy for such a big vehicle with the aerodynamics of a billboard.
I had a 3.5 twin screw, ridiculous torque, never a problem mechanically, but ran hot pulling my 9500lb trailer up Utah mountain passes in the summer. I now have the 5.0 coyote, haven't towed with it yet but daily driving it's averaging 4-5 mph higher than my 3.5 eco ever did.
And to think that the 3.5 they brought to this race is not even the fastest one. How much quicker is the limited f-150?
Alot
InnerGuide. Nothing official from ford itself. There is unofficial f150 from Hennessy and Roush. But they all cost $90k plus. Some are all about performance on the street. Some around making the raptor look slow not as off road worthy.
It's Limited
Thumbs up if you want the same race at sea level! 👍 GMC 6.2 vs Ford EB at sea level would be a good race!
what difference does it make?
@@olivierr.5752 Quite a bit. One mile above sea level puts the oxygen density to be less reducing natural aspirated engines by 15 to 20% power. the eco boost having 2 turbos makes up for that to some degree.
@@bryankeenan4803 oh ok I see. Thank you for explaining
The EcoBoost still wins...
@@kylesonsalla7620 video link?
Anybody who's driven a 3.5 EcoBoost knew exactly how this contest would end.I'm a GM guy but the F-150 with that engine is a great performing truck
You're not a GM lover if you was you would have known that he didn't really put the power down in that GM Truck!
idk man, i have the 3,5 and i get 14 mpg, most stop and go traffic tho
@@ThePauldunbar :very true, indeed.
@@ThePauldunbar and they only perform that well a mile above sea level.
Only wins by the turbo set up in the high elevation my 6.2 is way way faster than the ecoturds
Would have loved to see where the 5.3 gm would fit in. Also what about 2nd place, a faceoff between the GMC and hemi would've been cool.
5.3 is slooooooooow.
Better than the ram 6 cylinder a little slower than the Ram 5.7....
5.3's are slugs
The Nissan had 2.93s? That thing is flippin' fast for having that ratio. Imagine if it had 3.73s... or Toyota Tundra's 4.10s/4.30s....
@@jldude84 I disagree after looking at the drive ratios for each transmission in each truck. Nissan may have a taller first gear, but both Ford and GM have more power oriented drive ratios in the middle of the transmission. A 3.15 or 3.31 axle ratio between these trucks will have a noticeable advantage over other competitors. I think the reason why the Nissan can hang is because the VK56VD maintains a pretty good torque/hp curve.
Should have done a top speed ungoverned run..totan would have got em
What if they compared apples to apples, top of the line 2019 Denali vs 2019 f150 limited with 450 hp and 510 tq. Then the 6.2 would look even sillier than it did
The coyote didn’t go down without a fight 🤔‼️ I think it would have beat the other 4 trucks
I was fairly close to the EcoBoost. I would've liked to see it against the others as well.
I wanna see them with matching gear ratios. 3.55 or 3.31 both. I find it odd the ecoboost had 3.31 most of them are 3.73 and some 3.55.
@@braaap850 Can't ... The EcoBoost would smoke the tires with 3.73's
@@CGF1214 You act like the coyote is slow! They are so close in power it is barely noticeable. I gaurantee there would be less than a half a truck length between these trucks if they both had the same gears. 5.0 lost by 1 length and 3.15 gears when the ecoboost had 3.31.
Hey fellas, I just bought my ideal truck, a 2019 Ram 1500 Laramie Sport. You guys played a big role in my research and helping me come to my decision. So I want to say thank you for that.
It's been a year...how do you like it ?
I’m thinking based on the coyotes performance against the ecoboost that it to may beat the 5.7 HEMI and 6.2 GMC.... Good video guys!
Yeah it would. The coyote is a beast
Well I have a 2018 5.0L with 3.73 rear end.... My buddy has a 2013 5.7 RAM with only 35,000kms and the 5.0 smokes it in a race.... I have no experience against a newer RAM, but at least my buddy has to keep quiet about his big fancy HEMI haha!
Why do the km matters? And what does the hemi have for the rear ?
CloneTrooper55 Gaming I’m not sure what the rear end in the HEMI is.... And I say 35,000kms because my F150 has 5,000kms and it’s not like I’m racing a 5 year old RAM with 250,000kms on it.... Just pointing out that’s it’s got low kms.
Yeah, I'd like to see the Coyote vs Hemi vs 6.2. WTG Ecoboost!
Looks like that Hemi was closer to the Ecoboost than the 6.2 was. I'd like to see those 2 go at it.
the 5.0 looked to be the closest to the ecoboost
Im not even a ford guy, but ive been telling everyone to stop snoring at those damn ecoboost engines😂
Owner of a 2014 ecoboost! I absolutely love it. Best motor ever!!!!
2017 here. Best truck I've ever owned!
I have a 2014 Ecoboost too and I love it
I may not agree with the whole eco boost thing, but god damn technology wins
Although I wouldn't buy a v-6 powered truck, I have to hand it to Ford for having the fastest and most capable truck on the market. And now they are offering the high output engine from the raptor? It's going to be eating trucks for breakfast. I love your video guys and thank you for always keeping us up to date, great job!
So why wouldn't you buy the v-6?
@@slydog75bc most of us truck owner/drivers don't look into buying a truck for efficiency or to save gas. I will never drive anything less than a v-8 on a pick up and gladly wave the ecoboost engine trucks past me cause they will never sound as good mine does, plus a supercharger would fix that real quick without sacrificing the sound.
@@roniebonilla8611 lol at the supercharger combo. You'd go spend an additional 8-10 grand just to keep up with a ecoboost. And heaven forbid the eco owner goes aftermarket turbos and tune. The HO 3.5 makes 455/510. Imagine what that will be with a good tune.
Most truck owners aren't going to justify spending close to ten grand extra just to beat a factory truck configuration. I own a 2014 f150 5.0, and it's a turd compared to the new 5.0, which is a turd compared to the ecoboost.
I get that truck guys love the v8 sound. But sound doesn't do any work.
I towed a trailer and car to Georgia and back, and got out accelerated up a massive grade by an ecoboost f150 pulling a gigantic camper trailer. I was struggling at 45 in 3rd and he went by me like I was sitting still.
TWIN TURBO V6
Well quick, it's as capable as the rest lets be clear.... Ford ppl are just sad. sorry they all about the same thats a fact and facts matter.
This is why I love f150s they tow more and it has more features and also it is way more faster then the gm cmtrucks
Cool Squad damn what drugs are u on fords are trash
Fords rule. Chevys drool.
Norm Ross Fords crash chevy just dash on by 😂
@@normross1426 you 12?
More faster? Maybe you should take some online grammar lessons.
Gotta love the twin turbo 3.5 😎
No
yeah but the 2.7 is faster
My CarKilledU its faster 0-60 after 60 the 3.5 will destroy the 2.7. It’s already been proven just watch any video out there
@@ZACH_95_ And it's also faster if you have any payload in or towing behind it even 0-60. The 3.5 is the king.
Yeah. It’s even better in the Ford GT MK II, which makes an astonishing 700 HORSEPOWER from that engine!
Ford got them without Raptor 😎
@Porky WithAPistol raptor doesn't compete
The hellcat ram will beat the raptor
Porky WithAPistol you sound like someone who read something false and decided to repeat it on here.
@@jabroni6199 You mean ford's own media white paper that said they only expect 170k miles out of the ecoboost engines?
@@MrJcjet post link, make sure it actually says exactly what you just said it said
Just here too see all the children complaining about turbos... 🙄
For people who want a product that’s ready to go the F-150 is a great truck. For guys like me who modify and want room to build they’re a bad buy. Turbo’s or not I’m not buying a pickup with a 6 cylinder in it.
Jason Whitlock 😂😂🎯 alotta internet mechanics
Savage ass 😂😂😂
No complaints, just wish they'd have had turbos on all the trucks. Forced vs natural aspiration isn't a fair race, the turbos on that 3.5 give it 75% of its hp lmao
@@Kodiak-xk5dc Don't want a V6 truck? You should get a Ranger or Colorado they have a 4 cylinder option.
You guys need to do videos on which truck rust the fastest !
Stanley Kania ahemmmm dodge
Trucks have come so far over the years. The difference between a truck from today and only ten years ago is night and day. They have improved so much it's hard to believe. Auto manufacturers have been in such intense competition in recent that they have pushed one another to exceed most imaginations. We love these FRIENDLY competitions because at the end of the day the real winners are all of us the consumers.
The way you build momentum is awesome
Just drove home my new Sierra AT4 from Minnesota to Chicago Suburbs yesterday. What a nice ride. Put the thing in sport mode and with the 6.2L it rockets off the line.
Truthfully I don't buy trucks to win drag races ... I buy them to work , haul , tow , pull , and be safe in ... my 97- F150 4.6 5 speed with 258,000 miles has had the crap used out it , and still runs & drives great . Good luck with that twin turbo engine holding tight after 100,000 miles. If you want to see something interesting and get down to brass tacks , disable the turbos and run it natural aspiration then see what it can do , probably won't pull the hat off the top of your head !! It's a Good thing I didn't get rid of my ole Ford after losing a few races against my friends trucks , I would've missed out on one of the best workhorses I've ever owned !! Don't get me wrong I'm not dissing it , I'm a Ford guy , but I give credit where it's due & putting twin turbos on a small displacement engine with a truck with a barrage of lightweight aluminum alloy pieces is very innovative , but I'll trade all that for a heavy sure-footed solid safe truck getting 16MPG with no worries about it flying apart before 200K miles !!
Peace Out !! -WM
While your '97 may be made of steel and appear "solid" because of it, don't let that fool you into believing the 10th Gen trucks were/are any more sturdy, or safe than any generation built after them. Have you ever seen the amount of frame and body flex on a 10th Gen F150? How about their crash ratings? They were absolutely dismal for their time.
If you pit any 10th Gen F150 against a current 13th Gen, it would lose badly in every conceivable category. Yes, they're pricey and yes they're complex....but that's simply a reflection of the industry and inflation adjustment. Not to mention options found on a full blown Lariat of the 90's era can be had on even the most basic of models today. Don't let nostalgia, ignorance and personal bias get in the way of cold hard facts when it comes to making an "informed" decision.
As far as engine choice goes. The Ecoboost isn't for everyone. Despite the unarguable superiority of the package itself, some guys just "need" to hear that V8 growl under hood when they press the loud pedal. Heck...I'm one of them...but I recognise that I'm giving up a "superior platform" for the sake of nostalgia and personal bias. That being the case....the Coyote is probably the best V8 Ford (or most any manufacturer for that matter) has built in the last 40-years.
My dad still has his 97 he bought off the lot, 358K and still going! Sure, you can somewhat tell the 4.6's age but no real motor problems. Only have had replace/re-machined heads after 250k(??) But still a very solid work truck.
I’m a Ford guy myself. I own a 07 5.4, and a 17 3.5. Fact is the 3.5 will out pull, out tow and still win a drag race than just about anything in its class, and it is a safer vehicle to boot.....
Mine to it has 300,000 an still gets me to work everyday
I go with and stay with what works my friend . Like I said , I'm a Ford guy thru and thru , and far from ignorant ... please believe that , so don't try to educate me , or take me to school so to speak , as far as trucks go , I've pulled , hauled , towed , stump jerked , hammered on , overworked pushed to the limit and bent Fords , Chevy , Dodges , Jeeps , etc ... if you've done the same , Welcome to the Working Man's Real World Country Cub .
Yes , the Coyote 5.0 is bad ass !! As is the old 300 - S6
Might be the only thing we agree on , other than that .....
You Say Tomoto ... Is Say Tomato !! Peace Out - MW
I had a 2012 EcoBoost f150 and it was a great truck, absolutely loved it. I recently traded in for a 2018 5.0 f150 and I loved so far both are great trucks. Ford FTW
Surprised the titan held it's own.
If the titan had a decent rear end gear ratio, it probably would have beat the GMC.
To be honest, had the Titan had something like the ram had in the rear (3.92) it might have beat even the eco boost. I mean it held on against the gmc really closely but had a wayyy taller rear end ratio. That things a beast, and that’s coming from a ford guy lol.
Imagine if the ecoboost had the 3.73 though
Nissan has something there, just need to put more money into the platform.
Very happy with my 2018 3.5L F150, cool to see it perform so well in that race.
I guess the Raptor was left out coz it wouldn’t be a contest at all; however, the base 3.5 represented well!
A raptor? 🤦♂️ in that case should of brought out the yenko silverado
@Ronald Worster How is it not stock? It's a vehicle built by a department within the company. All components are factory components, manufactured by Ford, with a full manufacturer's warranty. SVT is a division within Ford. Ford doesn't send it out to be modified. (Like Roush or Hennessey) I happened to see someone driving in a Roush modified Raptor, today. HOLY CRAP!!! Now THAT is not a stock vehicle, by any means. LOL
So really the 5.0 was probably second fastest...
Funny thing is the 2.7 is faster 0-60 and to the 1/4 mile than the 3.5 😂
Doc's Vendetta Ride Why?
Yep, the 2.7 ecoboost is even quicker than its Big brother, the 3.5 in stock form.
Once reprogrammed or upping the boost, the 3.5 becomes the winner over the 2.7 and both become miles ahead of any other truck in existence including any V8.
@@ColdSmokes plus less weight
Kind of looks that way.
Hell ya EcoBoost Haha. Toyota didn't want their tundra to be embarrassed.
The 3.15 is a terrible ratio for that coyote. But it's run what you brung right? Good racing! Very real world!
Funny how it's terrible, but it's practically the second fastest truck in this line up...
5.0 F150 was closer to the ecoboost than that 6.2 gmc was.
The 5.0 coyote should be second place
It's just to hard to compete with the lightweight of the twin turbo....it's simple physics.
The 3.5 is actually heavier than the 5.0 but it's worth every ounce.
FORD TRUCKS 41 YEARS STRAIGHT NUMBER ONE!!!!!
Bad Ass Mofo McDonald's also outsells the others. It too must sell high quality lol. That's what your comment sounds like to me
It’s only number one because GM does not want to let people know that chevy they are the same truck. So when someone buys a gmc and or a Chevy truck it’s the same one so if they added both those two company’s of how many they sold they will beat ford hands down from day one and they will be selling for over 42 years number 1.
Not true
Bad Ass Mofo I drive a toyota currently with 269k. Drives better than any POS you drive
Frankie Desam very true
And the 2.7 eco boost is actually substantially quicker.
No it's not... I have the 3.5EB gen2 and test drove both 3.5EB and 2.7EB prior to my purchase.... the 2.7 feels faster from the start but runs out of steam in high rpms.. the 3.5EB pulls harder with a longer meatier torque curve all the way to the redline.... which makes the 3.5EB quicker
Just check the numbers
I have had both, sold the 3.5.and I have a 2.7 now and stock this 2.7 truck is faster and that's a fact for sure. And I know it would beat my 2013 3.5L to 100 mph everytime. Just because the 3.5 has more.horse doesnt.mean it's a faster truck.
Yep. Ram was right there and looked the best with great torque. And the hemi sure sounds good still!
I'm a Chevy guy. But my buddy bought a brand new Ford F-150 and I knew before this even started that truck would win because when he took me for a drive in it that was one of the fastest vehicle's I've ever been in. I couldn't believe that thing had a v-6 in it. Blew my mind really.
2017 F150 3.5 Ecoboost
0-60 5.9 seconds
1/4 mile 14.5 seconds
2016 GMC Sierra Denali 6.2
0-60. 5.7 seconds
1/4 mile 14.1 seconds
Moral of the story, the turbos retain horsepower and torque at elevation. Common real world scenario when not so high above sea level, all of the naturally aspirated trucks would be faster by quite a bit, and the GMC would have won. But if your are indeed in the mountains, the 3.5 F150 would be what you want for towing.
Justin Ninke ya I believe the coyote f150 would have done a lot better also
The raptor 3.5 has 0-60 in 5.0 seconds
Jared Champagne, if you want to talk about souped up special vehicles, the Hennessey GMC Sierra HPE800 with 6.2 does 0-60 in 3.9 seconds and ¼ mile in 12.3 seconds @112mph. Neat huh!
All the other videos I have watched says it's the 3.5 twin turbo every time.
HEY Roman you realize that is a skateboarding sweater ( skateboard trucks ) it has nothing to do with pick-up trucks!🤗
And you can add another 2 car lengths to those wins with a dyno tune on that eco boost
@ The Fast Lane Truck You Did not mention what axle ratios are on this these Trucks ! All the differance in 1/4 mile a 0-60 times !
Conclusion: The 2 Ford trucks are the fastest of the 6
At a mile above sea level, I would be more concerned if they weren't.
Shawn Elliott the 5.0 ford had the same disadvantage as the rest of the trucks yet it was 2nd fastest. The only one with the advantage was the 3.5 ecoboost.
No ford has beaten my hemi with 3.92 gears yet so I am sure this was fixed.
Peter Jamieson put a tundra in there and see what happens
Peter Jamieson more speed= less torque therefore fastest truck is the weakest
You all should know it's more than just engine.
Congrats ford.
I’m a Ford guy, but I’m still upset they didnt include Silverados in this video
Vincent Moreno - That's because they can't compete!
They had a fricken Siera. WTF
Loulovesspeed did you not see the Sierra?
@@T3CHK1NG54 Sierras are much better built than junky Chevy's.
@@MrKnuckles8978 same exact frickin powertrains on a Silverado & Sierra (samr model years) you tool...smh. ONLY differences are styling on body parts.
V6 twin turbo all the way baby! Long live the EcoBoosts mighty reign, GTR is a twin turbo V6 and they are up over 3000hp full mod. Wont be long and the 3.5 eco will have the aftermarket support to be deep into the 1000hp range... these F150s are killer. 6 bolt main, bossed in oil pan/girdle, rigid head design with great gasket clamping force. Delete the DI, big injectors and big boost let's go baby. My 13' is close to 500hp with basic bolt ons lol... glad my tail lights look so good for ya.
No 2.7 f150?? I feel like that would be the fastest of them all!!
My 2.7 was stupid quick. Fastest truck I've owned. I've had a many V8s and they just didn't compare.
Yup. People running in the high 11s with just a tune.
Why would a smaller engine be faster when they're both twin turbos? Serious question.
@@slydog75 A hair lighter and the power curve (transmission is the same)
i own a 2.7 and it is jerky in sport and when i looked it on google, ford made the 2.7 the most jerky with the trans.
2:24 was the best unexpected part! Lol
That's so funny 😂 in all actuality the two Ford's were the closest. I bet the 5.0 would have outran the Sierra.
Nope they wont
I eat dodges and fords trucks everyday I have a 2016 6.2 GMC sierra and it smokes them all........come get some and it's still stock! but a supercharger coming soon......
Imagine if they (the 2 Fords) ran a decent gear ratio in the rear end for this race???? The 3.15 and 3.31 are the two slowest rear-ends Ford makes.
If they ran the 3.55 locker or the 3.73, it would have been even more embarrassing for the GM, Dodge and what ever else those were.
@@bryonscheer2759 well too bad it's slower than a V6. LOL!!!
@@nickhowell168 yeah No so go drive your 1999 ford Ranger!!!
I own a 1999 f 250 turbo 7.3 L power stroke that i bought new and has 237,000 miles and has never been in shop except for tires and oil change. I will never buy another truck. I have an International harvester 1586 that
weighs 18,000 pounds and it joyrides with it on the highway.
On the 5.0 Coyote, did you guys turn the sport mode on ? That makes a big difference
Smell of Gasoline probably not lol
Love this episode… that being said I would love to see a 2022 version of this test??!!!
Would be perfect now that the tundra and the Silverado are boosted and soon the ram will have the hurricane!
Keep up the incredible work guys!! ❤️
2022 it's obviously just between lightning and the rivian. They aren't good at a lot of truck stuff but they are not going to get beat at drag racing by any combustion engine
@@Eric-zs6rd eh those trucks can't even tow 100 miles without running out of range, they shouldn't be in the tests.
Would love to have seen the coyote against more than just the Ecoboost.
I have a 2.7 ecoboost and having driven the coyote for a week I was not impressed. The 2.7 is faster. However I don't think any of the non turbos should even try to race any of the 3 ecoboosts. I would like to see the coyote against the other V8's.
EB would still win.
This will once and for all settle all the Country backyard disputes
hahahaha
Just finished the video.
It's great to see the Ecoboost is still king.
Why not Chevy with the 5.3? That’s the most popular motor in the half ton trucks from GM
Because everything here would shit all over the 5.3L. That engine has ZERO chance of even holding its ground against any of the trucks in this video except for maybe the naturally aspirated V6 Ram.
Lol that was my point Chevy had to send there big motor in to keep up with the others. The 5.3 is at the bottom of the barrel. Even ram sent a v6 knowing it wouldn’t do good but yet they still did it Chevy wouldn’t even send there 5.3
Slowwwwwweee
@@papyro8054 wrong dummy...the 5.3 is NOT "the bottom of the heap", the 5.3 is a very strong running motor for it's displacement. It puts out 350 horsepower and around the same in torque right off the lot. Chevrolet makes a 4.3 V6 and a 4.8 V8 and they're good strong motors. The ONLY reason Ford's 3.5 V6 is so strong is that it has TWO turbochargers!
Then why do they always send there 6.2 and not the 5.4 even ram sent a v6 along with there v8 and it does not have a turbo on it. Chevy always does this in all these tests. If they would of sent the 5.3 it would of came in last out of all the v8 models!
I'm a Ford guy but was actually surprised by this outcome. I'd of put my money on the 6.2 Sierra. It's a very good truck. They all are, almost. The v6 in the ram is a bit lacking in my opinion. I have the same engine in my Jeep and while my Jeep has plenty of power, it also doesn't have the weight of a full size truck. But hey, some people love that ram and that's ok.
The trim around the F-150 ‘s grill looks really cool
He called him punk ass lol. Love the chemistry.
Chevy has been trying to figure out a way to beat the ecoboost F150 since 2011 lol. I guess they're gonna buy some hellcat engines for their trucks next time...
They should consider putting a Corvette ZR1 engine into the GM twins. It might have a chance to beat Ford's EcoBoost. ;)
Lmao if they wanted to beat it they put a supercharger on top, no one cares about a fast truck consumer reports show that. If you want something to go fast get a zr1 or a camaro. If your buying a truck for 0-60 your buying it for the wrong reason
Patrick Simmons c
daniel Stark you don't live in Texas do you?
DizzKid most likely doesn't live in the south in general lol
Fastest halftone truck, not my 94 Silverado, the speedometer only goes up to 85 and it top's out and 68, 0 to 60 in 29 seconds XD
isaiah the hillbilly lol! i bet it could pull the neighbors house down and then carry the houses remains in the bed though! trucks are for work not speed.
My 7.3 does 0-60 in fifteen seconds. Thing is, it'll do that regardless of the weight behind it.
@@jacobg5122 do it pulling a peice of shit Chevy
Have you seen those 3.5 EcoBoost with just a tune and launching with high 4x4? Low 4 seconds 0 to 60 mph that is some fast shit
And that's not even Ford's most powerful engine configuration
Nor Rams
Yep not rams
Kyler the Ram’s 6.4 is in a 2500 not a 1500 tho
Kyler lol dodge dont got crap on the new ecoboost 470hp 510 ft-lbs in the new raptor engine thats a 3.5l
Logan Hudson new 2019 Limited with the HO 3.5 EcoBoost will be awesome. 450hp/510 on tap for a lighter truck will be cool
but damn, that Hemi sounds great!
Love my 2019 Raptor Supercrew.
the 5.0 was the closest to the ecoboost. Maybe its because of the weight savings being only a 2x4
Ecoboost might still win at sea level but the altitude of this track gave the forced induction motor a HUGE advantage.
The eco will always have an advantage and at all sea levels
I wouldn't pick a turbo charged truck if i'm gonna put it to work they will ware out quickly but if i'm gonna use it for just a daily use like a regular car then it's okay
Virtually every semi and working hauler out there running a turbo
@@courtneyanderson2293 semi trucks run with diesel and not gas have you seen any diesel truck in this video or is this video about semi truck? Or can a half ton truck pull 40 tons like semi trucks? Your comment is pointless
i think the coyote would of taken the GMC maybe....but of course it was lighter by a few hundred pounds im sure since 2wd
That's what I want to see, the Ford 5.0 against the GMC 6.2. The 5.0 was close to the ecoboost, even with the granny rear axle ratio. I bet it could hang with the GMC 6.2
I think so too, it was at the bed of the ecoboost and the ecoboost spun really bad against the GM. pretty sure the coyote would have beat the RAM too.