In the Expert's Chair with Dr. David Buss
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Dr Pennebaker speaks with Dr Buss a founder of the field of Evolutionary Psychology in this clip from Introduction to Psychology with James Pennebaker and Sam Gosling.
Website: www.psychologyl...
RUclips: / @psychologyliveorgutau...
Google+: plus.google.co...
I've bitten the evolutionary dust and couldn't be happier about that decision.
same.
His comments on men murdering men is soo interesting. I’ve never thought of things like that.
Yeah I can confidently say most of the problems I’m aware of are caused by men haha.
Fantastic. Great to hear the master talk.
Here from DCCC PSY 140 General Psychology 302 002. 6/2/2023 10:58 PM
Very interesting video! Makes me wonder more about evolutionary psychology.
Shout out to outschool pysch class 2020
Very interesting subjects, i'll definitely look into some of Dr. David Buss's other interviews, i like his way of explaining things.
anyone else here in UC Berkeleys Psych 1 course and doin this shid for homework 🤣
ayy lmao Go Bears!
Not Berkeley❤️ but my local tech college.
i liked this video...thanks doctors
Very interesting!
I love the idea of evolutionary psychology.. Because a lot of mental stuff that went on "way back when," if it was consistently effective/successful, occurring over long enough period of time, may have evolved some behavioral dna spcific to that successful behavior.. We're starting to understand how prehistoric nutrition and eating behavior still has some effect on our physical bodies.. Makes sense that there might be some useful understandings gained from consistent ancient behaviors and thinking tendencies.. For instance, I think we're almost helplessly programmed (via genetic material etc) to be religious, regardless of our rational thinking..
Huge resource with evolutionary psychology, in terms of workable theories to apply to forensics, as they touch on here..
Most pre-agriculture humans were polyandrous. Monogamy is a relatively recent society adaptation to the creation of private property and inheritance. Its not likely that jealousy evolved within only some thousands of years when it would likely take millions of years for such an advanced psychological emotion to develop.
You probably dont give a shit but if you are stoned like me atm then you can stream pretty much all of the latest series on instaflixxer. I've been streaming with my gf for the last couple of days xD
@Kevin Drew Yea, been using Instaflixxer for since december myself :)
Yes, many societies practiced this, but many people have a natural predisposition to attractions to small groups of people for friendship/romance. It may have been practiced by some, but other people likely raised a family together with their mate, which is common in nature. Even in nomadic native American peoples, marriages were strong societal institutions in many tribes
Thats not true. Where is the evidence for that? Because there is evidence against both your points.
@@user-lx7jn9gy6q i dont know how many introverts, etc people you know, but in my experience, they usually keep only a small amount of close people as ties, which usually also includes family members. Even in nature. Where there isn't as much of a concept for land rights and inheritance "terrirtory" many animals mate for life. Some people prefer to be with one person, others would like to mate with several. There have been studies that support the original commentary position, but my stance is that it is based on the individual, their experience, their family, and their local culture
I, too, don't recommend stalking
Tai Lopez took me here
Same got to keep learning... haha
At 4:45 someone asked how evolutionary psychology explains the existence of homosexuality. The explanation can be found here: ruclips.net/video/4Khn_z9FPmU/видео.html
I'm curios about his operational definition of murder. It just seems that many murders committed for personal reasons rather than for payment or allegiances would be men killing women that appear vulnerable to physical attacks or coercion. However, if I were to think of war, the ratio "mostly men killing men" sounds accurate while the motives are varied, obscured, sometimes ridiculous. So I can't even make a decent guess at his operational definition of murder.
The statistics - generalised across the world - don't agree with this stance. Men kill men in significantly higher numbers than men kill women. While they do make up the largest portion of Rape / Sexual Assault, we must also remember that in a lot of western countries, men cannot be 'raped' under law, rather 'only' sexually assaulted, so such figures are heavily skewed.
Men are predominantly physically violent, this is true and I don't think anyone could argue this. Though I would argue that women utilise psychological warfare (and in more modern history, especially last 20-30 years) women too are becoming increasingly violent (I speak for the West only here).
He has some really big hands! I bet everyone in his family does. No wonder he knows so much about mating.
biting the evolutionary dust....
mamas baby, papas maybe, (Paternity uncertainty) psychological design of jealousy is different in men and women