One of the worst parts was when some guy started saying something like "To all the teenagers who think we're ignorant about technology, we aren't". They really aren't aware at all how little they know.
Representative of Texas and he talked about the China communist party being able in the future to get data from tiktok since they own the parent company. Brought up how there is already leaked data from america to China then brought up that quote referring to the protection of children’s user data. How america could potentially lose internally due to data targeting. Although he also didn’t let the ceo speak 😂 and cut him off most times when he was trying to. He also kept inferring the tik tok ceo was Chinese 😅 I think at one point he or someone mentioned why is it called project texas when the company the ceo was working with was based in texas LMFAO
What he was trying to imply is that they will use their data to promote the whole CCP narrative. Misleading everyone into de-vilify the communist party. And it's been working. A lot of young Americans are unaware of the evil regime. There's a huge divide going on in your country because of that. Soon I won't even be able to use RUclips here in Hong Kong to comment this..
Yea he was also sweating bullets because they started bringing up other Chinese CEOs and realized he has a very good chance of either being told he’s not allowed to run Tik Tok anymore or just getting killed
she attempted to establish that 2 different companies from china who should be unrelated have deep connections on the back end and if they freely share information they collect between each other without profit motive. (this eludes to the CCP being the connecting factor) It is just really hard to do when the person you are asking yes or no questions wont answer with either of those and just rambles about other things.
It made me so mad because they didnt let bro respond. like unless he was about to say "yes tiktok hates children and supports genocide" they arent going to let him talk.
They were determining his allegiance via hard questions. If they got his opinion on the Uyghurs, thats a clear indicator. Obviously he didnt answer cause then us or china would immediatly smack the shit out of him tho
@@Aiophgy Disney and most of Hollywood bows to China in every movie they make by removing anything critical to Chinese rule, does this mean they're loyal to China?
I find it so funny imagining a whole team of highly sophisticated and intelligent people at TikTok's HQ coming up with every possible response to intricate cyber security questions just to be hit with "Does TikTok access WiFi?"
The hearing wasn't to question TikTok, it was for the people in congress to reaffirm to themselves that they think they know what they are talking about.
they need to go back to school And re learn All bout Technology.Dude even 5 years old Know What Wifi and How it work.When i'm seeing this clip i was like This old fart must be joking.
The biggest issue with these congresspeople is they don't actually want to seriously evaluate TikTok as a threat or pass legislation to improve national security. They want to LOOK hard on TikTok and the CCP while cameras are pointed at them so then they can play those clips and go "ohh look how hard I was on TikTok now vote for me" come election time. That's also the reason why they keep bizarrely asking about the CEO's nationality or whether he himself believes in Uyghur human rights abuses- that way they can argue that they're so hard on China (when in reality that has nothing to do with TikTok). Their minds were already made up on TikTok before the CEO said a word, and they just want to use the briefing to convince ignorant people to vote for them during elections.
I Googled her to see what people were saying about her responses and I found her personal government website which funny enough is labeled by Google as a non-fully secured website that attackers can get access to. She's so concerned about security she didn't even secure her own website
that one guy started off so strong. he seemed genuine, he used terminology that at least made him appear somewhat intelligent, he is clearly a very formal individual in a respectable position. only to ask if tiktok connects to the fucking wi-fi
Yeah this is most straight yt men in America if we're being honest. Such a confident lack of understanding or ability to see through someone elses lense that they 40-60% of the time seem sociopathic to people that don't have that problem
Dude, the level of smugness I saw from her was hilarious It's like asking a toddler if they can count from 1 to 10, then they skip every odd number and still end up looking at you with triumph
yal are all wrong, charlie completely botched his entire explaination of this event. she brought up a 400 view tiktok post because that post was calling for this specific congress to be murdered, only tiktok and congress even knew about the meetup, tiktok/ccp made the tiktok to try and get americans to murder congress. the reason people keep cutting off the ceo is because they only have 5 minutes each and need to spend their time perfectly.
No, he built up to asking if TikTok accesses other devices on the same WiFi network. How the fuck could so many people not comprehend the question is mind boggling.
Actually, it's even the exact opposite: everyone fucking disagrees with her. The voters disagree with these politicians and know more about the subject.
Her continually saying yes is pretty much her thinking she won an argument because she didn't let him talk. "my question was so good, look at him. Flabbergasted with no response after I only gave him .04 seconds time. I'm so good at this."
They have a set limited time for their questions, so they try to get in as much as possible so that they can clip it and use it for campaigning back home (and they know from previous hearings of this kind - that if they actually let the guy answer, it would end up taking up most of their allotted time slot) most of em are just cynical opportunists trying to advance their domestic political careers
@@jtjoemamma don’t forget the weirdly cropped “don’t tread on me” snake on the iPad case. It’s driving me nuts the whole case isn’t yellow, and why it’s on there like that.
Then are you really above the idiot in the first place? I mean if you are smarter but let the dumb one get more experienced what are you doing up there in the first place? Step back down where you belong. Underneath the idiot.
The sad part is this is pretty much how every single congressional hearing goes. They ask dumb and repetitive question, they are extremely rude and cut off the person trying to answer the questions, and they never get to the bottom of anything.
@@keiytofficial agreed… and there used to be a time where you could escape politics by watching sports or movies but now politics has found it’s way into every facet of life. It keeps people riled up and at each other’s throats. Divide and conquer is their game and unfortunately we fall for it every time.
@@matt909er man idk how to tell you this but sports and movies have always been political in some way, it's just more obvious now because everybody talks about it so everybody's constantly looking for it
@@matt909er movies have always been political lmao. I mean go back 45 years to Star Wars, our PRESIDENT named a whole plan after it and the movies were a direct reference to the Nazis and authoritarianism which was not long ago at that point. Go back to even the sitcoms of the 50’s and 60’s, plenty of controversies with race and political themes. Many of the people like Betty white were famous for political controversy in their works
It’s actually insane how good they are making this man look. I full heartedly can not understand how that lady ever got to the position she was in, when she talks like that in court. She’s acting like she’s on to something and the fact he’s not responding in yes or no seems to fuel her need to cut him off. Also there’s this dude in the background that look’s asleep.
It's pretty easy. Sell out your beliefs and be lucky. If it took hard work the people there would actually care. No one cares about the actual person it's who they will vote for to be majority leader. You can have the best representative ever but if they vote for the other party you disagree with you're better off voting against them. Why? Who controls the house and senate is picked by a handful if that of seats ie the senate being barely in democrats control. If they lose I think 1- 3 Republicans control it and comes huge change similar with the house but a few more seats. Sad but that's the state of our congress and won't get better since no one will give up power.
one of the scariest things is that a lot of people gained trust in tiktok because of this as if they were worthy of trust solely due to incompetent politicians
Not understanding tech doesn't mean there are risk with such a big social media company being based out of China, especially when it comes to US and China geopolitics
The fact that this comment doesn't have more likes scares me. Then again, I'm sure people who watch this guy's channel are a bunch of TikTokers themselves lol
@@MinecraftGod69420 It doesn't. We're literally teetering on the edge of a civil war and an absolute economic collapse. You know some lawmakers are proposing to bring back lynching? Lynching, like hanging people from tree lynching. And when you consider all the SHIT lawmakers have been passing lately with absolutely no public voting, it'll probably fucking happen!
Her just talking over him and basically answering her own questions on his behalf makes me want to throw my phone across the room. Not only is it downright rude and annoying but it’s so unprofessional.
whats interesting is that there was another congress woman who asked genuine questions about racism in tiktoks algorithm and the ceo was really listening and taking notes so he could properly answer them. imagine how much more productive this could've been if the others actually understood what they were talking about. or if they at least knew the difference between china and singapore
"If they at least knew the difference between china and singapore" I personally never take something like that seriously, because we also can't tell the difference between every nationality in Europe too. I'm pretty sure majority of Asians don't even know the difference between British and English, so I don't think it's fair to expect otherwise from them.
@hamoIQ black panther was a bad movie tho ngl that's understandable but the new Stat wars weren't too bad they really couldn't of done too much else with the story tbh
The biggest issue here is. There are legitimate concerns to address when it comes to tiktok and how it's managed. Just none of them bothered looking into any of them
Americans who blindly defend an app they know nothing about solely because they've become addicted to it says a lot - but they need to understand that CHINA has a different version of tiktok for its own population, than the one it released to the world ~ that is a GIANT RED FLAG = literally, a red flag
My favorite part was when they asked “Mr. Chew, does tiktok support genocide?” And he replied “why yes, yes it does” and proceeded to morb out of the room
Im just super proud of charlie. He stuck to his word about putting more effort into his reaction videos. He keeps us up to date on news but instead of just sitting and watching the video with his viewers he constructs a concise intro to explain the video contents, then splices his thoughts throughout.
@Andrew Peng the China ones are blatant racism Facebook uses our data, youtube, amazon, yet the attack the Singaporean guy because hes the "china man"
But china doesn't allow foreign companies without siding with a Chinese company 😂 that's the main issue here. Also, china will cry their asses out if the US bans any Chinese company 🤦♂️, i do agree that she was stupid for not letting him answer the question like damm let him cook
1:25 Funnily enough, the Tiktok CEO himself even made the point that no government official should have any social media apps installed on their phones.
Whoever said there are no stupid questions, must never have listened to these congress people. These are the types of questions people with smooth brains and blank minds ask.
These are not your average stupid questions, these are verbal weapons against braincells... And we all just lost an amount of IQ points having heard them. May God have mercy on this country for having such idiotic government officials each be given a pen and an office chair.
My problem with this whole thing is how there is litterally people dying to school shootings and instead of spending time on working/fixing that the government is busy dealing with unimportant cases like this. It is honestly sad to me.
A good deal of your politicians having a spyware app on their phone that feeds directly to China is a kind of a big deal, actually. Especially if they handle sensitive information.
@@matmat9644 this country is so dumb man, it sucks that people my age and around it have to deal with the worrying thought of having a shooter in the building
@@OncelerKidsAreCringe I’m just saying it would be more important to focus on serious topics rather than TikTok, especially when people who have no clue what the case is about are representing it
I've never been more embarrassed to be an American than I was during that TikTok hearing. I had second hand embarrassment, first hand embarrassment, post embarrassment, pre embarrassment, I don't know if the embarrassment will ever go away. I've never been so embarrassed in my life about anything.
@@Randomperson462 I hate those people lol. Sure is easy to feel like a badass when you cover yourself in scary stickers even when there's nobody who cares
The terrifying reality is that the bill intended to ban TikTok can change the internet as we know it. If Bill s.686 (The Restrict Act) passes, it will grant officials the control of any form of technology that has access to the internet, along with your privacy. This is a very important topic to look into because the TikTok Congressional Ban could bring many other terrifying changes to the internet.
Yes, this should be stopped. If this is true, it’s an obvious path of light that shows the inevitability of corruption, I’m scared America will become like Nazi Germany.
Always post the full information. It goes specifically to technologies and software from certain adversaries of the US (Iran,China,Russia,North Korea,Etc.) Not domestic products or services.
Plenty of VPNs and illegal pirate apps exist, I use them all the time, I highly doubt the government can even control the internet even if they tried. Not even the owners of the social media apps can control it.
Chinese tik tok promotes stem to kids. American tiktok promotes racial and gender ideologies to children. Propaganda works, and these selective algorithms amplify messages meant to divide us. And it works.
@LadPasta what institutional power do they wield? Because from what I can tell the left controls, the media, colleges, public schools, the fbi/dhs, social media, silicon valley
@@Instabruh.User..u are, otherwise you wouldn’t have any reason to say that, and even if you’re being honest(unlikely), your comment adds nothing to anything , it’s pointless, you are pointless Of course, you won’t reply, you can’t reply, because you’re just an annoying bot. I don’t even know why I’m here writing this comment. You’re pointless -🔺
Congressman: “How does an algorithm? Yes or No?” Shou: “I believe there may be a misunders-” Congressman: “IT’S A SIMPLE YES OR NO, WOW, I YIELD MY TIME!”
they dont let him speak because last time they did a trial for idiotic bans was with heavy metal and dee snider, he made nothing but perfect sense and all they could do was put the parental advisory on CD's and stuff
They don't actually want the answers. This is just a performance for them to use in ads and campaigning, so they can clip themselves and pretend they're doing something
It’s a congressional hearing trial, so every motion is like one in a court hearing. I never see countless comments or even RUclips videos start spoofing lawyers for asking if OJ Simpson was an American football player! After reading your comment, I concurred, that TikTok is really making teens dumb 🤭
It’s not that, it’s just an easy way to make even an honest person look guilty. Ask a really weird question that requires a comprehensive answer, then make it seem like the inability to give a straight y/n is an admission of guilt. Really embarrassing that these people run the country
@@donothesitate1198 "Don't tread on me". If you don't know what that is, it's a flag from the American revolution when they were fighting for independence. But now it's mostly used by government bootlicks (or in this case, someone who wears the boot).
Seriously this hearing actually made me feel blessed that the absolute worst tech questions I get from my Grandma or parents is how to protect their passwords or set up new ones if needed and keep in mind I'm not even the most tech savvy person in my house.
As a science teacher here in Arizona, the attention span issues are problematic but handleable in all honesty. If you connect with your audience (students in my case) they pay attention. If you ban something people will find ways around it.
Hope you realize the attention span issues isn't the only problem right, at least not for now. This kids will have a harder time learning in the future due to this and that will make america generally dumber in a few decades, while the chinese are focusing in studies and advancement of technology and the worst part is china will know more about all the kids using tiktok now than their parents.
@@Pedro-vm1vg that's crazy man, i wish i could feel smarter by repeating other people's unthought-out opinions over and over. maybe if you say "china" again it'll be more convincing.
@@HeterosexuaI Other people opinions? dunno who you talking about honestly, that's just my opinion. I'm not even American and I think tiktok poses a huge fucking threat to America, if you don't either you're dumb or addicted to it
The bigger issue at hand is that Tiktok does everything US based social platforms do. So to take TikTok to task, you would need to also take Twt, FB, even Google to task. And they won't do it
Exactly. They need to either hold it all accountable, or let TikTok slide if they’re going to ignore the other platforms. It’s irritating when people aren’t consistent and always make stupid exceptions.
Yup this is comment I was looking for. Much more deeper sinister issues at hand, Tiktok is just a drop in the ocean of it all but we need to start somewhere.
About that hearing, that's standard for a congressional hearing because theres a disconnect between the witness and the representative. The representative is VERY crunched for time and wants very short succinct answers in the form of a yes or a no but the witness more often than not wants to delve into the nuance and "save face" by offering an explanation. In court, any court, congressional or otherwise, everyone making the inquiries do not want any more information than what they prompt you for. Offering more information than what was asked is simply not acceptable in a hearing format because its highly probable the witness will try to confuse you with detail. Basically, the more opportunity you have to speak, the more opportunity you have to lie - or incriminate yourself.
As a European. It’s Not just your goverment. It feels like it’s a Must for a goverment worker to have a Toast IQ. Bc i Listen to some Podcast with some Ex cia etc and These People Are very Smart and know How to use the Internet but the goverment itself. Holy moly
Gosh that was painful the constant "I have a speech and its not being interrupted even to listen to the answers for the questions Im asking" Also the "just say yes" is such a "hey listen, be the out for our stupidity"
Legislation always seems to run about 30-40 years behind the times. There's something to be said for having advisory committees comprised of both old AND young people, so you get a good mix of the issues facing both demographics as well as their unique knowledge sets.
There’s also something to be said for not rushing to regulation every time something happens, but my god, our system is so bloated and our reps have their empty heads so far up their rectums that it takes way _too_ long for anything of substance to get done.
@@minafrota6124 in an argument you're supposed to listen to the other side and then counter-argue their point. the woman was constantly interrupting the guy and not even giving him a chance to defend himself, just smugly stating shit she clearly doesn't even know about. also, are you going to reply this to every comment?
recently it became even more goofy as tom cotton just could not understand that the tiktok CEO is SINGAPOREAN, i swear he doesn't know what Singapore is
That Kat whoever had the nastiest smug little smirk on her face as she ran over him with her own questions and throwing out her own answers on top of his. Absolutely repulsive lmao
They barely let him speak. Regardless on the thoughts on TikTok, I feel as though it was disrespectful and unfair as both sides should fairly share their perspectives.
shout out to congresswoman yvette clarke who was tbh the only person who asked questions to the ceo about how tik tok flags black content more harshly and blocks access from black creators to monetize their content. you can literally see him breathe more easily when she starts talking because she’s the only one who was patient with her questions and his replies. wild it was in a room full odd people
Yeah I saw that when I watched a little bit of it live and she definitely seemed the most competent. A lot of the congressmen either didn’t know what they were talking about or tried to keep interrupting the ceo and throwing hand gestures to act like they were “working for the people”, when they were really just sounding like idiots.
Just another example of someone asking stupid questions there is no evidence that that is happening its just a conspiracy theory and it has nothing to do with the privacy and security issues they are there to discuss.
Not even old, just willingly ignorant. Why would they educate themselves on anything. (Because that requires real work lol) It’s the US government they get paid millions to be toddlers and sit in their high chairs and spit up on their gold bibs.
What's sad is that they're not even that old. The lady in this video is 35, born in 1988, she's a Millennial. They're just career politicians with no real-world experience pushing an agenda.
I'm tired of this as the big example everyone points too. It's not even result of his age or lack of technology awareness. (I do admit many and maybe even him, are too out of touch) He was asking questions like a lawyer, laying a foundation, get him to say the obvious things to get to the real question. I wish he included the full clip. Does tik tok use wifi? Yes. And are there usually other devices that also use WiFi on one network? Yes. Can and does tik tok access information about or from those other devices. It's laying it out for people who may not understand how WiFi works.
This reminds me when Mark Zuckerberg had to explain how how the Internet works to the congress, and answering simple questions that they could’ve researched themselves. Edit: Oh shit Moist already mentioned it but oh well.
they coulda prepped with someone who knew shit, got their internets101, asked all their dumb questions, and then created some actual decent ones..... BUT NO.
Yea and the technologically handicapped and fearmongers ran with it. Making clips to infinity about some of the dumbest parts of the entire thing just like they will do with this. Too many people don't understand that the one app they are scared of/hate is accessing the same data being accessed by pretty much all the other apps out there as well.
@@Hex_Hub_Plushe had to play dirty bc it’s basically impossible to defend amber. I honestly feel kinda bad lol but yeah he was annyo- Objection hearsay!
She rly does lol looks like half the customers i deal with at the bakery i work at. The kind that cry bc a single frosting flower on their childs cake (who doesnt even care rly) is the wrong shade of Pretty Princess Pink or whatever lmao
I mean it should be deleted. It contributes nothing to society except waisting peoples time, making them more sedentary and lazy, and shortening their attention spans.
Even when they had valid issues or points, they managed to find some of the worse ways to try to ask those questions 🤦♀some things are a little more complicated than, "yes or no. Just say yes... yes."
@@minafrota6124 The questions themselves may have been fine, but the fact that they wouldn't actually let him answer the question is why people should be upset. It's like they were trying to lure discourse in a particular direction that benefitted them rather than wanting to know the truth.
"Congressman, you have the floor" "Okay Mr. Tiktok guy, explain to me why I only get thirst traps, and femboys on my for you page." "Sir, that's just your algorithm..." "Enough of this Chinese nonsense!"
if the CEO of tiktok just said that the app can see if you are money laundering and doing illegal stock trades it might make congress quite literally shit themselves
"We made a feature where the GPS sends an alert if you go near Epstein Island or other secluded locations just in case people get lost at sea." *half of congress "accidentally broke their personal phone" and require a new number on the same day*
I'm angry that they didn't get several experts on the topic to come up with questions. They literally have the entire DoD personnel at their disposal - surely a few of them can formulate better questions than this.
Mina Frota if the whole govt making itself look more ignorant and worse as it already is than TikTok counts as good questioning then well, you got some high standards there
That lady asking the questions reminds me of one of those strict teacher you dislike in school that always cuts you off when he/she wants a yes or no answer
reminds me of my old teacher who got into an argument with my friend for "sending the wrong file type". she had to get the IT guy in because she didn't know how to right click and wouldn't let anyone else explain it to her. freaking boomer karens, the worst of both worlds i swear
Thats not comparable. That teacher is told how to do something by a book made by some boring idiot with no mind or freethought of his own. Lardfat lady was taking a question and completely askewing it into something different entirely.
That's subjective, i did that with maths answers and i simply used a alternative which i understood, that still worked. The teachers decided how to react to this (usually i just stuck with my methods and they eventually gave in, 'cause it just worked). These congress lot were more like incompetant teachers going through the motions, asking a question but not letting anyone say more than the basics.
@@ricotta5753 the point is that they come to the conclusion that tiktok is detrimental to the world, but the wrong way, much akin to getting the right answer on a math question using a completely different method
I feel like the main trend with any sort of congressional hearings is that it tends to highlight how ignorant and lacking in knowledge people in Congress can be things because they're out of touch; whether it's internet related, women's anatomy (I recall an instance of a congressmen thinking that the stomach somehow leads to the uterus), or video games (I.E. the old "video games make kids violent BS")
Congress is a direct reflection of the general population. This country is comprised and ran by low iq people. Low intelligence seems to be the only bipartisan feature this country has
I have to see that "stomach uterus" thing because ain't no way a grown ass man said that on television, he will never get laid again, no matter how much money he got
@@ManiacX1999 Given I frequently STILL see guys think girls can "hold their period in" like it's pee, and some grown ass men that are at least 30 think that pee comes out of the 'gina, I wouldn't be surprised if some congressman thinks the uterus is after the stomach, like, it's in the abdomen! with the stomach!
I think what they were inferring is; does it look at the data of other devices than the one you are currently using for tik tok? Because they rape our households personal digital information for advertising and I don't agree with it. That's why i don't use Facebook, nor tik tok. RUclips gives me survey after survey trying to see what ads I would like to see since I don't share my data. They believe Tik tok does more than keep data for advertising. I understand their point of view. Any human can come to America and make a social media app. Like a Chinese government ally that sends diagnostic ad data to China. I have had tik tok install itself three times on my phone without doing it myself. I get ads for it all the time. I don't trust tik tok. I'd rather trust Instagram rather than tik tok. Although Mark Zuckerberg does the same thing except he a white boi.
@@minafrota6124 I didn’t watch the hearing, because I couldn’t possibly care less, so I have no clue how relevant the questions were or weren’t. I’m just here for the jokes and memes.
I dunno what to hate in this hearing anymore, either hating tiktok for you know, being tiktok, or the fact that these questions that were questioned to the tiktok CEO was just either self explanatory or just straight up stupid as some of them felt as if these questions were made by someone who doesnt know anything about social media taking a chunk of our social info and credentials.
it pains me to think of how many questions could have been asked that could have gotten us some actually valuable information and instead we end up with this 😐
I have no confidence in China's intentions - that should be main concern here. These deliberations are just some public relations maneuvers. In reality, these questions are handled by intelligence and counter-intelligence, because it is on a scale of national security.
@@Sornemus it should be assumed that every powerful body will act in self interest. Because that is a reasonable critique of capitalism, and conservatives cannot accept growth, they will default to absurd racist presumptions.
@@epicthief ironically, japanese politicians tend to be more in touch with reality/the youth. It's ironic because the japanese voting demographics is so incredibly old.
as an 18yr old american girl from alabama (state with one of the lowest GPA’s and almost the worst education state-wise) i could’ve done better than them. and i have 0 idea how congress stuff works.
Mr Chew has made every Singaporean proud. To be able to sit through 5 hours of this comedy special without losing his composure, patience of a saint indeed.
Unfortunately younger people don't have their pull and resources. So you have these walking raisins calling the shots when they can barely operate a touch screen phone.
Congress and the Senate both need a term limit like the President does. Unfortunately, doing so would require amending the Constitution, which will never happen because these scum sucking parasites will never willingly give up their positions of power.
@@subifyouhatetiktokandreddit234 and you prefer boomers and gen x to be their? Let the millennials and zoomers in with what a fucking joke politicians in the US are this combo atrocity might do some good
tbh the only way you can't like tiktok is if you almost never use it and only hear about it, otherwise after a few days, the algorithm will almost perfectly set up videos you're interested in and actually would like to watch, its only the random trends that pop up randomly and ruin it, one good concern tho is content creator equality and attention spans being hurt
@@spider-mancantsee5875 Republicans are notoriously terrible at doing their jobs, they aren't even qualified 90% of the time, maybe more. Republican base will literally elect anyone as long as they agree with their feelings on a subject. Banning abortion? HELL YEAH LETS ELECT THAT PERSON BECAUSE WE HATE WOMEN CHOOSING WHAT TO DO WITH THEIR BODY! (that's just an example)
in america it is not a popularity contest, you just have a choice between two gariatric corrupt white guys who have the exact same policys, exept one of them just hates black people openly while the other tries to hide his racism
@@dragon_flyz its not but have fun with grandpa and grandma who can't even turn the volume up and down on their TV cause they're so fucking old they don't know what a remote is run this country. Being out of touch is proven to be detrimental to whatever you're running, whether its small like a company or huge like the entire fucking united states of america.
Only if most of the country knows what is a good criterion for governing, and they can pick and choose between more than 3 candidates. None of that's happening. It's names that get votes, not platforms
I just find it hilarious they’re mad at the privacy issues regarding a Chinese company owning tiktok. Meanwhile, ignoring who the American companies have been selling the same data to all this time anyway 🤣
Exactly, and they keep voting every single year to renew the Patriot Act as well that no one seems to care about. They are all hypocrites that don't actually stand for anything.
The tiktok algorithm in America vs China are radically different. In America, the algorithm promotes gender confusion, blue hair insanity, and outright degeneracy. In China, the algorithm promotes education, resolve, and leadership. Most Americans are too stupid to understand they are under attack.
@@purplfedora800 it’s very likely they are. Shame these fossils can’t ask the important questions like that one and keep letting tech giants get away with abusing their consumers trust
One of the worst parts was when some guy started saying something like "To all the teenagers who think we're ignorant about technology, we aren't". They really aren't aware at all how little they know.
Representative of Texas and he talked about the China communist party being able in the future to get data from tiktok since they own the parent company. Brought up how there is already leaked data from america to China then brought up that quote referring to the protection of children’s user data. How america could potentially lose internally due to data targeting. Although he also didn’t let the ceo speak 😂 and cut him off most times when he was trying to. He also kept inferring the tik tok ceo was Chinese 😅 I think at one point he or someone mentioned why is it called project texas when the company the ceo was working with was based in texas LMFAO
That's funny. We say the exact thing about teenagers and people in their 20s.😂😂😂
@@slyguythreeonetwonine3172 Fortunately you won't be alive in 20 years.
What he was trying to imply is that they will use their data to promote the whole CCP narrative. Misleading everyone into de-vilify the communist party. And it's been working. A lot of young Americans are unaware of the evil regime. There's a huge divide going on in your country because of that. Soon I won't even be able to use RUclips here in Hong Kong to comment this..
If you know just a little about a topic you are confident about it because you still don't know how much you ignore
It’s funny af how the CEO is just dumbfounded after he asked “Does TikTok access the home network?” The CEO was just like “Wtf?”
Yea he was also sweating bullets because they started bringing up other Chinese CEOs and realized he has a very good chance of either being told he’s not allowed to run Tik Tok anymore or just getting killed
@@juststop5768 the man is from Singapore, he himself said it
@@juststop5768 bruh... he is singaporean not chinese. People think singapore is part of china lmao
@@songwriteropgt1196 China does too
@@goddessyamato5238 Yeah, but China says the same thing about a lot of land masses it doesn't actually own, so.
Her repeatedly saying yes hurts. It’s like having your brain cells hammered out of your head with every “yes”
It's pissing me off with how many times she's cutting him off like damn bitch let him talk.
Nothing more frustrating than watching a stupid person nodding yes when they clearly don’t get it.
That's prime miss trunchbull behaviour, she even look like abusive and sadistic teacher who would whipped her students with cat o nine tails whip.
I feel sorry for her spouse....
she attempted to establish that 2 different companies from china who should be unrelated have deep connections on the back end and if they freely share information they collect between each other without profit motive. (this eludes to the CCP being the connecting factor) It is just really hard to do when the person you are asking yes or no questions wont answer with either of those and just rambles about other things.
It made me so mad because they didnt let bro respond. like unless he was about to say "yes tiktok hates children and supports genocide" they arent going to let him talk.
They were determining his allegiance via hard questions. If they got his opinion on the Uyghurs, thats a clear indicator. Obviously he didnt answer cause then us or china would immediatly smack the shit out of him tho
@@Aiophgy dude, the questions were literally "does TikTok use wifi?" and "Why do you need to scan eyes for the filter?"
@@Aiophgy
Disney and most of Hollywood bows to China in every movie they make by removing anything critical to Chinese rule, does this mean they're loyal to China?
Tiktok loves children.
Because they make them money.
Well, they do lol
I find it so funny imagining a whole team of highly sophisticated and intelligent people at TikTok's HQ coming up with every possible response to intricate cyber security questions just to be hit with "Does TikTok access WiFi?"
Got em' good
Honestly, they asked good questions relevant to the subject. I don't understand why people seem to be mad at the congress people.
@@minafrota6124 How do you? Yes or no please??? Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes!!!111!!1!
@Mina Frota Yes because asking if it accesses wifi with no further explanation is a good question
@@minafrota6124 (can't tell is this is satire
The hearing wasn't to question TikTok, it was for the people in congress to reaffirm to themselves that they think they know what they are talking about.
YES. Yes
@Logan Floor shut up
lol you think tiktok is good. lmaooooooooooooo
@@blueshkylol, you're reading too much into it. lmaoooooo
@Logan Floor bot
You'd think people in such important positions would be more than able to ask questions in a clear and concise manner
Or even has some connections and do some research about stuff
Or know what the fuck the internet is. "Does it connect to wifi" is potentially the most reduntant question to ask about a social media platform
most people dont know what they are doing at government positions.
they need to go back to school And re learn All bout Technology.Dude even 5 years old Know What Wifi and How it work.When i'm seeing this clip i was like This old fart must be joking.
People at power are just faces
the fact that they brought a shitpost up as a threat was just hilarious
Old people can't understand recent memes and its too funny to watch lmao
Still I think the “does TikTok use home wifi” question was the funniest 🤣
The biggest issue with these congresspeople is they don't actually want to seriously evaluate TikTok as a threat or pass legislation to improve national security. They want to LOOK hard on TikTok and the CCP while cameras are pointed at them so then they can play those clips and go "ohh look how hard I was on TikTok now vote for me" come election time. That's also the reason why they keep bizarrely asking about the CEO's nationality or whether he himself believes in Uyghur human rights abuses- that way they can argue that they're so hard on China (when in reality that has nothing to do with TikTok).
Their minds were already made up on TikTok before the CEO said a word, and they just want to use the briefing to convince ignorant people to vote for them during elections.
Your pfp scared the everliving shit out of me😭
the fact that you dont understand that shitpost is making you and other children vegetables is just hilarious
her repeating yes over and over as he tries to talk should be a example of why she shouldn't be a representative of anything lmao
She also boasts a “don’t tread on me sticker” usually a calling card for anybody who struggles with the concept of nuance
Shell get re-elected too. Welcome to America, this is not new and not getting better, enjoy the ride.
Maybe the rep or KFC
@@joslynhayes8530 In the words of this women Yes!
In June 2022, reports emerged that ByteDance employees in China could access US data and repeatedly accessed the private information of TikTok users
I Googled her to see what people were saying about her responses and I found her personal government website which funny enough is labeled by Google as a non-fully secured website that attackers can get access to. She's so concerned about security she didn't even secure her own website
OMG LMAO
Sounds like she is a hypocrite that needs a reality check.
🤡🤡
Hilarious
Lmfaooo
that one guy started off so strong. he seemed genuine, he used terminology that at least made him appear somewhat intelligent, he is clearly a very formal individual in a respectable position.
only to ask if tiktok connects to the fucking wi-fi
Yeah this is most straight yt men in America if we're being honest. Such a confident lack of understanding or ability to see through someone elses lense that they 40-60% of the time seem sociopathic to people that don't have that problem
Dude, the level of smugness I saw from her was hilarious
It's like asking a toddler if they can count from 1 to 10, then they skip every odd number and still end up looking at you with triumph
The difference is that’s just adorable and probably ends up in some wholesome meme comp from 2010.
@@friendist9323 True, this woman's probably just gonna end up in a "Home for the Senile" commercial
yal are all wrong, charlie completely botched his entire explaination of this event. she brought up a 400 view tiktok post because that post was calling for this specific congress to be murdered, only tiktok and congress even knew about the meetup, tiktok/ccp made the tiktok to try and get americans to murder congress. the reason people keep cutting off the ceo is because they only have 5 minutes each and need to spend their time perfectly.
@@goldgamer6796 There is a reason senile and senator use the same word root (sen).
@@goldgamer6796 I'm beggin'
Asking if TikTok connects to Wi-Fi is like asking if water connects to the ground when it rains.
Nah asking if water can connect to a glass.
No, he built up to asking if TikTok accesses other devices on the same WiFi network. How the fuck could so many people not comprehend the question is mind boggling.
Does a bear shit in the woods?
@@BreakRaven then just ask that question. "Does tiktok connect to the home wifi?" is a stupid ass question
@@BreakRaven thats not what he asked. point blank you can try to fill it in as much as you want but you wont fill shit up
I bet she felt like she was making a great point each time she says yes
yes
She's a fat Karen, what do you expect?🤷♂
Yes
Yes
As Winston Churchill once said, “The best argument against Democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”
US govt officials try not to look like dumbarses for 10 secs challenge (impossible)
Ok?
This isnt a voter, wtf are you talking about. Did you just want to share a famous quote entirely unrelated to the situation to sound smart?
Actually, it's even the exact opposite: everyone fucking disagrees with her. The voters disagree with these politicians and know more about the subject.
@@TheCompleteMental People vote for who sits in congress...
Her continually saying yes is pretty much her thinking she won an argument because she didn't let him talk. "my question was so good, look at him. Flabbergasted with no response after I only gave him .04 seconds time. I'm so good at this."
They have a set limited time for their questions, so they try to get in as much as possible so that they can clip it and use it for campaigning back home
(and they know from previous hearings of this kind - that if they actually let the guy answer, it would end up taking up most of their allotted time slot)
most of em are just cynical opportunists trying to advance their domestic political careers
@@laxjs Holy shit that was on the nose. 👏
"R-Florida" tells you everything you need to know
In June 2022, reports emerged that ByteDance employees in China could access US data and repeatedly accessed the private information of TikTok users
@@jtjoemamma don’t forget the weirdly cropped “don’t tread on me” snake on the iPad case. It’s driving me nuts the whole case isn’t yellow, and why it’s on there like that.
I can’t get over the fact that she asks him a question but then interrupts him before he can answer and just keeps saying “yes. yes. yes. yes or no.”
@@Instabruh.User.. not tru
That's all house hearings in general. The house has been pathetic for decades.
@@bobhanson1037 All of US politics have been a sham, man.
it's sooo triggering
The way she did it reminded me of that Judge Judy show
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - Mark Twain
"Yeah but without the grease, all you can taste is the hog anus."
-Homer Simpson
"My balls itch."
- Me
Yes
Yes
Then are you really above the idiot in the first place? I mean if you are smarter but let the dumb one get more experienced what are you doing up there in the first place? Step back down where you belong. Underneath the idiot.
The sad part is this is pretty much how every single congressional hearing goes. They ask dumb and repetitive question, they are extremely rude and cut off the person trying to answer the questions, and they never get to the bottom of anything.
this is exactly why I hate politics
@@keiytofficial agreed… and there used to be a time where you could escape politics by watching sports or movies but now politics has found it’s way into every facet of life. It keeps people riled up and at each other’s throats. Divide and conquer is their game and unfortunately we fall for it every time.
@@matt909er yeah but i dont want to get into that
@@matt909er man idk how to tell you this but sports and movies have always been political in some way, it's just more obvious now because everybody talks about it so everybody's constantly looking for it
@@matt909er movies have always been political lmao. I mean go back 45 years to Star Wars, our PRESIDENT named a whole plan after it and the movies were a direct reference to the Nazis and authoritarianism which was not long ago at that point.
Go back to even the sitcoms of the 50’s and 60’s, plenty of controversies with race and political themes. Many of the people like Betty white were famous for political controversy in their works
What's even worse is that this could have had massive implications for the way user data and privacy policies are handled.
Check out the RESTRICT Act the senate has put in the works, basically confirms that
Imagine if they brought in a tech specialist to clarify questions and answers
That would be a little too reasonable for congress....
@@Instabruh.User.. the (not a bot) at the end has convinced me that you arent a bot
Bruh, they do that and all they gonna do is "Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes" and talk over them
nope, the 90iq hambeast will do a better job
@@The-Ent1ty They successfully got the guy to lie on record to Congress. TikTok needs to be banned.
It’s actually insane how good they are making this man look. I full heartedly can not understand how that lady ever got to the position she was in, when she talks like that in court. She’s acting like she’s on to something and the fact he’s not responding in yes or no seems to fuel her need to cut him off. Also there’s this dude in the background that look’s asleep.
Florida Republican. Need I say more?
It's pretty easy. Sell out your beliefs and be lucky. If it took hard work the people there would actually care. No one cares about the actual person it's who they will vote for to be majority leader. You can have the best representative ever but if they vote for the other party you disagree with you're better off voting against them. Why? Who controls the house and senate is picked by a handful if that of seats ie the senate being barely in democrats control. If they lose I think 1- 3 Republicans control it and comes huge change similar with the house but a few more seats. Sad but that's the state of our congress and won't get better since no one will give up power.
@@Taima oml. I'm not surprised as a fellow Floridian. So many numbnuts down here
They're 100% in on it dude. TikTok probably just gave these fellas a few bucks, and just asked to amp up the retardation.
@Novantico bro, the rest of the world sees no differences lol.
You're all American to us.
I’m genuinely convinced these people just like hearing themselves talk sometimes
these bots need to realize that just because they say they’re not a bot doesn’t mean people won’t know they’re bots
@@bonus8386 😭😭😭and then their next comment said "not a bot or lie" NO RIZZ
Yes
@@Instabruh.User.. no you’re not
Duh, they are politicians.
“You confirm this, yes?”
“Uh, no this is wrong”
“Yeah you confirmed this”
one of the scariest things is that a lot of people gained trust in tiktok because of this as if they were worthy of trust solely due to incompetent politicians
It's like watching Eclipsa trial in Svtfoe.
I think it's time we should start to tackle this our own way because at this point, we can't just let the government do it
It should make us even more afraid that politicians dont have any idea how it works
Not understanding tech doesn't mean there are risk with such a big social media company being based out of China, especially when it comes to US and China geopolitics
The fact that this comment doesn't have more likes scares me. Then again, I'm sure people who watch this guy's channel are a bunch of TikTokers themselves lol
It's crazy to me how sure of herself this woman is. She is 100% certain she knows what she is doing.
It's people like that that make me question how the country even functions lol
@@MinecraftGod69420 it doesn't function lol
@@MinecraftGod69420 It doesn't. We're literally teetering on the edge of a civil war and an absolute economic collapse. You know some lawmakers are proposing to bring back lynching? Lynching, like hanging people from tree lynching. And when you consider all the SHIT lawmakers have been passing lately with absolutely no public voting, it'll probably fucking happen!
@@lance5445 lol fair point sir
bake it till you make it
"Does tiktok use wifi?" God help us all.
“does the stove use the powerlines?”
Stop watching these CringeTubers, I make better videos 😂👌
“Does the grocery store sell food”
@@avery2cute 💀
@@statticxx 💀
Her just talking over him and basically answering her own questions on his behalf makes me want to throw my phone across the room. Not only is it downright rude and annoying but it’s so unprofessional.
whats interesting is that there was another congress woman who asked genuine questions about racism in tiktoks algorithm and the ceo was really listening and taking notes so he could properly answer them. imagine how much more productive this could've been if the others actually understood what they were talking about. or if they at least knew the difference between china and singapore
Yeah and that’s really important considering chinas well known racist culture (such as the affects on both black panther and the new Star Wars movies)
@Don't Read My Profile Picture Yessir! As you ask.
"If they at least knew the difference between china and singapore" I personally never take something like that seriously, because we also can't tell the difference between every nationality in Europe too. I'm pretty sure majority of Asians don't even know the difference between British and English, so I don't think it's fair to expect otherwise from them.
@hamoIQ black panther was a bad movie tho ngl that's understandable but the new Stat wars weren't too bad they really couldn't of done too much else with the story tbh
@@lainelowe603 i had to read his name because i was reading your answer 😔
The biggest issue here is. There are legitimate concerns to address when it comes to tiktok and how it's managed. Just none of them bothered looking into any of them
Honestly, they asked good questions relevant to the subject. I don't understand why people seem to be mad at the congress people.
@@minafrota6124 ur spamming bot
Because those issues are beneficial to them. That's why.
Because none of them are smart enough to bother looking into any of them.
Americans who blindly defend an app they know nothing about solely because they've become addicted to it says a lot - but they need to understand that CHINA has a different version of tiktok for its own population, than the one it released to the world ~ that is a GIANT RED FLAG = literally, a red flag
My favorite part was when they asked “Mr. Chew, does tiktok support genocide?” And he replied “why yes, yes it does” and proceeded to morb out of the room
priceless ~😎
..and the clocking is tiktoking
@@RawOlympia Ba-dum tss!
It did literally try to cover up genocide
same Tho same
Im just super proud of charlie. He stuck to his word about putting more effort into his reaction videos. He keeps us up to date on news but instead of just sitting and watching the video with his viewers he constructs a concise intro to explain the video contents, then splices his thoughts throughout.
Every question they asked can literally apply to any other social media company.
@Andrew Peng the China ones are blatant racism
Facebook uses our data, youtube, amazon, yet the attack the Singaporean guy because hes the "china man"
Not even close. A government that harvests human organs in control of Tik Tok????? Dumb dumb people on the internet.
But china doesn't allow foreign companies without siding with a Chinese company 😂 that's the main issue here. Also, china will cry their asses out if the US bans any Chinese company 🤦♂️, i do agree that she was stupid for not letting him answer the question like damm let him cook
@@MORE_BEANS_PLZDONT forget that all Chinese company's have to comply with the CCP Dictatorship Regime
@@MORE_BEANS_PLZ Also it's hilarious because of the irony, Tik Tok is banned in China.
1:25 Funnily enough, the Tiktok CEO himself even made the point that no government official should have any social media apps installed on their phones.
He's totally right. Why are these government issued phones not locked down from top to bottom?
@logan_Floorno
@Logan Floor sthu bot
Tiktok gets automatically downloaded to devices
@@matrixplaysX
It does? this is news to me, where’s can I find this story?
Whoever said there are no stupid questions, must never have listened to these congress people. These are the types of questions people with smooth brains and blank minds ask.
there are no stupid questions though, only stupid people
Honestly, they asked good questions relevant to the subject. I don't understand why people seem to be mad at the congress people.
@@minafrota6124 You must be from an alternate dimension if you think those questions were good and on topic
@@NexusVFD that's a spammer/troll i believe
These are not your average stupid questions, these are verbal weapons against braincells... And we all just lost an amount of IQ points having heard them.
May God have mercy on this country for having such idiotic government officials each be given a pen and an office chair.
My problem with this whole thing is how there is litterally people dying to school shootings and instead of spending time on working/fixing that the government is busy dealing with unimportant cases like this. It is honestly sad to me.
A good deal of your politicians having a spyware app on their phone that feeds directly to China is a kind of a big deal, actually. Especially if they handle sensitive information.
Money first i guess.
@@matmat9644 this country is so dumb man, it sucks that people my age and around it have to deal with the worrying thought of having a shooter in the building
How would they fix that? They can’t predict people’s thoughts.
@@OncelerKidsAreCringe I’m just saying it would be more important to focus on serious topics rather than TikTok, especially when people who have no clue what the case is about are representing it
I've never been more embarrassed to be an American than I was during that TikTok hearing. I had second hand embarrassment, first hand embarrassment, post embarrassment, pre embarrassment, I don't know if the embarrassment will ever go away. I've never been so embarrassed in my life about anything.
I agree. The only thing I felt when I saw this was wave after wave of embarrassment.
missed the facebook hearing I guess then?
I’m pretty sure that why I flinched in my mom’s stomach as an embryo. Pre birth embarrassment.
@@TSMSnation This was way worse to be honest. 😂
Classic fucking American...Never? All the other shit, was fine...but THIS one takes the cake?
Government officials that have a “don’t tread on me” logo always cracks me up. Like bro, you ARE the boot that’s treading on me
Same shit with law enforcement/MAGA using the Punisher logo.
The "Age of consent is too high" sticker
They make up bigger scarier people to justify the impulse to wear "don't tread on me"
@@Randomperson462 I hate those people lol. Sure is easy to feel like a badass when you cover yourself in scary stickers even when there's nobody who cares
the anti-authoritarian authoritarian party: "don't tell me what to do but i'll do everything in my power to make you do what i want you to do"
They should just have a "bring your child to work day" and have the kids ask the questions. It'd be less sad
@@Instabruh.User.. Sounds like something a bot would say
@@Instabruh.User.. 🤔🤑
They have young interns that should have told the dinosaurs what to ask.
Kids would be able to ask some serious questions! Kids are fu¢king brutal!
The terrifying reality is that the bill intended to ban TikTok can change the internet as we know it. If Bill s.686 (The Restrict Act) passes, it will grant officials the control of any form of technology that has access to the internet, along with your privacy. This is a very important topic to look into because the TikTok Congressional Ban could bring many other terrifying changes to the internet.
Yes, this should be stopped. If this is true, it’s an obvious path of light that shows the inevitability of corruption, I’m scared America will become like Nazi Germany.
more good changes
Always post the full information. It goes specifically to technologies and software from certain adversaries of the US (Iran,China,Russia,North Korea,Etc.) Not domestic products or services.
Plenty of VPNs and illegal pirate apps exist, I use them all the time, I highly doubt the government can even control the internet even if they tried. Not even the owners of the social media apps can control it.
@JK-tx5em if by good changes you mean the complete erosion of american freedom of speech and freedom of press.
The irony on her laptop saying "Don't tread on me" while also trying to ban people from using an app is hilarious 6:38
seriously this woman needs to get laid.
Chinese tik tok promotes stem to kids. American tiktok promotes racial and gender ideologies to children. Propaganda works, and these selective algorithms amplify messages meant to divide us. And it works.
Libertarians are not known for being smart
the "dont tread on me" group consistently paints themselves as the snake when in reality they're the boot
@LadPasta what institutional power do they wield? Because from what I can tell the left controls, the media, colleges, public schools, the fbi/dhs, social media, silicon valley
The congressmen learning about wifi was something
*I’M BETTER THAN PENGUINZ0*
🧀
🧀
idiots elected him to begin with
Three bots in a row
If you were to put a laugh track every time someone asks a question, it could pass as a comedy sketch.
It's the type of comedy material that doesn't even need the people laughing to make you laugh
Omg someone please do this
@@Instabruh.User..u are, otherwise you wouldn’t have any reason to say that, and even if you’re being honest(unlikely), your comment adds nothing to anything , it’s pointless, you are pointless
Of course, you won’t reply, you can’t reply, because you’re just an annoying bot. I don’t even know why I’m here writing this comment.
You’re pointless -🔺
@@Instabruh.User.. 🤦♂️
@@oOoMiSSBiRDoOo I second that emotion!
DUDE THEY ARE SO TECHNOLOGICALLY ILLITERATE
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.” - Mark Twain
A very wise quote. I'll always remember it when I see a debate, whether it's a good one or not.
This needs to be on my wall with a quotes, from C.S. Lewis, yumeko Jabami, Miku, etc.
"The only thing that can beat an idiot is a numbskull"
-my wise-a§s uncle.
@@bluebaron6811 I find a good stick works pretty well too tbh.
What’s so frustrating is there are so many legitimate problems with tik tok they could of addressed, but instead they’re worried about a sh!t post
that post barely had any views either
Literally every problem they brought up applies to every other social media platform
Congressman: “How does an algorithm? Yes or No?”
Shou: “I believe there may be a misunders-”
Congressman: “IT’S A SIMPLE YES OR NO, WOW, I YIELD MY TIME!”
Charlie slowly realizing congressional hearing A) accomplish nothing, B) are all for show, and C) are a massive waste of taxpayer money
@YeaMan so you react if i tell you to stop self promoting in the worst place
@YeaMan even if thats true, no one likes self-promotion. Find a different outlet you stinky oyster
Congressman: "what is my favorite color, and how does it pineapple? yes or no?"
@@Lawrence_Talbot And they tell us to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps.
they dont let him speak because last time they did a trial for idiotic bans was with heavy metal and dee snider, he made nothing but perfect sense and all they could do was put the parental advisory on CD's and stuff
They are probably giving themselves a pat on the back after finishing this entire thing, "good job Rob! We showed him"
@Logan Floor you're kinda sad for spamming this like a leech mate
They don't actually want the answers. This is just a performance for them to use in ads and campaigning, so they can clip themselves and pretend they're doing something
Yes & no
True
The real political decision is already made behind closed doors. This is just drama
It’s a congressional hearing trial, so every motion is like one in a court hearing. I never see countless comments or even RUclips videos start spoofing lawyers for asking if OJ Simpson was an American football player! After reading your comment, I concurred, that TikTok is really making teens dumb 🤭
Yeah guys, Putin not sure what he want the Americans to do yet
That woman is one of those people who believe it is not an answer unless it's what they want to hear no matter how wrong that answer is.
Mothers😅
It’s not that, it’s just an easy way to make even an honest person look guilty. Ask a really weird question that requires a comprehensive answer, then make it seem like the inability to give a straight y/n is an admission of guilt. Really embarrassing that these people run the country
She unironically has a "No steppy snek" sticker on her computer. I think that says all you need to know about her.
@@drunkenhobo8020 TF is a no steppy sneak?
@@donothesitate1198 "Don't tread on me".
If you don't know what that is, it's a flag from the American revolution when they were fighting for independence. But now it's mostly used by government bootlicks (or in this case, someone who wears the boot).
I mean
Judging from her laptop sticker, this level of intelligence is to be expected
Yeah I could’ve seen that coming
Seriously this hearing actually made me feel blessed that the absolute worst tech questions I get from my Grandma or parents is how to protect their passwords or set up new ones if needed and keep in mind I'm not even the most tech savvy person in my house.
@@Instabruh.User.. kick rocks with sandals on
As a science teacher here in Arizona, the attention span issues are problematic but handleable in all honesty. If you connect with your audience (students in my case) they pay attention. If you ban something people will find ways around it.
Hope you realize the attention span issues isn't the only problem right, at least not for now. This kids will have a harder time learning in the future due to this and that will make america generally dumber in a few decades, while the chinese are focusing in studies and advancement of technology and the worst part is china will know more about all the kids using tiktok now than their parents.
@@Pedro-vm1vg that's crazy man, i wish i could feel smarter by repeating other people's unthought-out opinions over and over. maybe if you say "china" again it'll be more convincing.
@@HeterosexuaI Other people opinions? dunno who you talking about honestly, that's just my opinion.
I'm not even American and I think tiktok poses a huge fucking threat to America, if you don't either you're dumb or addicted to it
yeah the banning thing is right, when i was in school stuff like youtube was banned and I always found a way around it very easily
@@HeterosexuaI fr these people are so unoriginal
The bigger issue at hand is that Tiktok does everything US based social platforms do. So to take TikTok to task, you would need to also take Twt, FB, even Google to task. And they won't do it
The only difference is, only TikTok is directly owned by an authoritarian Communist government. Context matters.
Exactly. They need to either hold it all accountable, or let TikTok slide if they’re going to ignore the other platforms. It’s irritating when people aren’t consistent and always make stupid exceptions.
Yup this is comment I was looking for. Much more deeper sinister issues at hand, Tiktok is just a drop in the ocean of it all but we need to start somewhere.
yes it does.
but those other ones are not directly sending your info to China.
Americans love funnelling all their wealth to their precious billionaires and corporations too much for that
About that hearing, that's standard for a congressional hearing because theres a disconnect between the witness and the representative. The representative is VERY crunched for time and wants very short succinct answers in the form of a yes or a no but the witness more often than not wants to delve into the nuance and "save face" by offering an explanation. In court, any court, congressional or otherwise, everyone making the inquiries do not want any more information than what they prompt you for. Offering more information than what was asked is simply not acceptable in a hearing format because its highly probable the witness will try to confuse you with detail. Basically, the more opportunity you have to speak, the more opportunity you have to lie - or incriminate yourself.
It’s actually insane how out of touch our government is
They aren't out of touch they prefer to look incompetent before admitting they are negligent in purpose
Honestly, they asked good questions relevant to the subject. I don't understand why people seem to be mad at the congress people.
As a European. It’s Not just your goverment. It feels like it’s a Must for a goverment worker to have a Toast IQ. Bc i Listen to some Podcast with some Ex cia etc and These People Are very Smart and know How to use the Internet but the goverment itself. Holy moly
arghhh ughhhh unga bunga wast a toc tik?
@@onioncartel uugghhhh arrgghh bingo bango TikTok flavored turrrgeyy
Gosh that was painful the constant "I have a speech and its not being interrupted even to listen to the answers for the questions Im asking" Also the "just say yes" is such a "hey listen, be the out for our stupidity"
I automatically read "Hey listen" in Navi's voice, and I feel like it's really fitting
Legislation always seems to run about 30-40 years behind the times. There's something to be said for having advisory committees comprised of both old AND young people, so you get a good mix of the issues facing both demographics as well as their unique knowledge sets.
There’s also something to be said for not rushing to regulation every time something happens, but my god, our system is so bloated and our reps have their empty heads so far up their rectums that it takes way _too_ long for anything of substance to get done.
That requires competent people to implement first.
Honestly, they asked good questions relevant to the subject. I don't understand why people seem to be mad at the congress people.
@@minafrota6124 y do u keep spamming
@@minafrota6124 in an argument you're supposed to listen to the other side and then counter-argue their point. the woman was constantly interrupting the guy and not even giving him a chance to defend himself, just smugly stating shit she clearly doesn't even know about.
also, are you going to reply this to every comment?
recently it became even more goofy as tom cotton just could not understand that the tiktok CEO is SINGAPOREAN, i swear he doesn't know what Singapore is
That Kat whoever had the nastiest smug little smirk on her face as she ran over him with her own questions and throwing out her own answers on top of his. Absolutely repulsive lmao
She's 35 mind you
@@StevesSammiches wtf she is younger than my mom, and I am 19 years old
it's absolutely terrifying that congress managed to make the TikTok CEO look like the adult in the room
@YeaMan Yes you are.
They barely let him speak. Regardless on the thoughts on TikTok, I feel as though it was disrespectful and unfair as both sides should fairly share their perspectives.
Welcome to 2023
TikTok should be banned it supports pedophiles and anyone who uses TikTok is a pedophile
He didnt he was in their lieing to congress for five hours
shout out to congresswoman yvette clarke who was tbh the only person who asked questions to the ceo about how tik tok flags black content more harshly and blocks access from black creators to monetize their content. you can literally see him breathe more easily when she starts talking because she’s the only one who was patient with her questions and his replies. wild it was in a room full odd people
Trueee
Good for her
No one cares
@@forestmoss5225 i do ;p
Yeah I saw that when I watched a little bit of it live and she definitely seemed the most competent. A lot of the congressmen either didn’t know what they were talking about or tried to keep interrupting the ceo and throwing hand gestures to act like they were “working for the people”, when they were really just sounding like idiots.
Just another example of someone asking stupid questions there is no evidence that that is happening its just a conspiracy theory and it has nothing to do with the privacy and security issues they are there to discuss.
Her smile at 5:43 is going to haunt my nightmares for the rest of my life.
😂😂💀
Asking if tiktok accesses wifi is the dumbest thing ever. These government officials are too old and out of touch to be in positions of power anymore.
Not even old, just willingly ignorant. Why would they educate themselves on anything. (Because that requires real work lol) It’s the US government they get paid millions to be toddlers and sit in their high chairs and spit up on their gold bibs.
The honest answer that they don't want to accept
What's sad is that they're not even that old. The lady in this video is 35, born in 1988, she's a Millennial. They're just career politicians with no real-world experience pushing an agenda.
I'm tired of this as the big example everyone points too. It's not even result of his age or lack of technology awareness. (I do admit many and maybe even him, are too out of touch) He was asking questions like a lawyer, laying a foundation, get him to say the obvious things to get to the real question. I wish he included the full clip. Does tik tok use wifi? Yes. And are there usually other devices that also use WiFi on one network? Yes. Can and does tik tok access information about or from those other devices. It's laying it out for people who may not understand how WiFi works.
He called his assistant on his MOTOROLA flip phone and asked her to make dinner reservations😅
the fact that this hearing was 5½ hours is crazy. It's even crazy that the hearing got all the way up to congress, I swear tik tok is wild 💀💀💀
I'm better than Penguinz0 My content is better! (Not a lie and no I am not a bot)
Help us to make it a success for our community to see the best possible outcomes in our work
I can tell you use tik tok just from the fact you use skull emoji unironically
Anyone with TikTok should be a registered sex offender
Bro stop spamming
Everyone at that hearing had the same attention span as the average TikTok user
They secretly all have tiktok and want it banned because they want their attention spans back but can’t bring themselves to just uninstall it
LMFAO fr
SINGAPORE MENTIONED‼‼🔥🔥🔥
This reminds me when Mark Zuckerberg had to explain how how the Internet works to the congress, and answering simple questions that they could’ve researched themselves.
Edit: Oh shit Moist already mentioned it but oh well.
I loved the part where they asked if people don’t pay for Facebook how do you make money? And he’s just like we run ads 😊
they coulda prepped with someone who knew shit, got their internets101, asked all their dumb questions, and then created some actual decent ones..... BUT NO.
Yea and the technologically handicapped and fearmongers ran with it. Making clips to infinity about some of the dumbest parts of the entire thing just like they will do with this. Too many people don't understand that the one app they are scared of/hate is accessing the same data being accessed by pretty much all the other apps out there as well.
Her constantly saying “yes” and interrupting him reminded me of Amber Heard’s lawyer saying “Heresay”
Can't wait for her to give some stupid rant about how her dog stepped on a bee
Oh, yeah!!! I almost forgot about that terrible lawyer.
@@Hex_Hub_Plushe had to play dirty bc it’s basically impossible to defend amber. I honestly feel kinda bad lol but yeah he was annyo-
Objection hearsay!
That Congress woman that doesnt let the Tiktok CEO answer is a real Karen.
She rly does lol looks like half the customers i deal with at the bakery i work at. The kind that cry bc a single frosting flower on their childs cake (who doesnt even care rly) is the wrong shade of Pretty Princess Pink or whatever lmao
@@billiamdianthus4242you could say she is Manager Karen, let’s just hope the first women president isn’t the Supreme Manager Karen.
@@Instabruh.User.. bad bot
I mean it should be deleted. It contributes nothing to society except waisting peoples time, making them more sedentary and lazy, and shortening their attention spans.
YES.
The funniest part is how network news had to completely lie and doctor footage to even come close to spinning this as "Tiktok CEO dodges questions"
Even when they had valid issues or points, they managed to find some of the worse ways to try to ask those questions 🤦♀some things are a little more complicated than, "yes or no. Just say yes... yes."
Honestly, they asked good questions relevant to the subject. I don't understand why people seem to be mad at the congress people.
@@minafrota6124which one?
@@akatsukihajime6100 it's a bot that says the same thing on each comment
@@Chrisdish Wrong
@@Chrisdish theyre baiting dont respond to them
It's blows my mind how these people in a position this high are allowed to decide certain things that could affect our lives as individuals
politicians only know politics like spongebob and fine dining and breathing
similar to how software developers don't know how to use computers and only know code
i could see arguments for banning tiktok or something, but oh my fucking god these people should not be able to decide on _anything._
Don't they make alot of money to
@@pizzahut8482 I would imagine so, for a position this high I presume you'll be paid nicely
"Willfully Stupid" is the perfect way to describe that lady. Until now I never knew what to call people like her.
Honestly, they asked good questions relevant to the subject. I don't understand why people seem to be mad at the congress people.
She’s from Florida, can’t expect too much with politicians from there
Yes
@@minafrota6124 The questions themselves may have been fine, but the fact that they wouldn't actually let him answer the question is why people should be upset. It's like they were trying to lure discourse in a particular direction that benefitted them rather than wanting to know the truth.
Karen
"Congressman, you have the floor"
"Okay Mr. Tiktok guy, explain to me why I only get thirst traps, and femboys on my for you page."
"Sir, that's just your algorithm..."
"Enough of this Chinese nonsense!"
if the CEO of tiktok just said that the app can see if you are money laundering and doing illegal stock trades
it might make congress quite literally shit themselves
Hahaha. Man I'd love to see their expressions lolol
"We made a feature where the GPS sends an alert if you go near Epstein Island or other secluded locations just in case people get lost at sea."
*half of congress "accidentally broke their personal phone" and require a new number on the same day*
Unfortunately it’s not illegal for them to use insider trading.
@@adriftinglinkyeah, that's how Nancy Pelosi got away with it if I recall correctly
There is that tiktoker that follows Nancy Pelosi's stock trades. So, it probably can based on user data.
I tried watching someone else explain it but gave up because I knew they wouldn't be able to explain it as smoothly as you
Same
Ratio
Who asked
fucking what
if you watch the first 30 minutes of the hearing then you would understand it lol
I'm angry that they didn't get several experts on the topic to come up with questions. They literally have the entire DoD personnel at their disposal - surely a few of them can formulate better questions than this.
Honestly, they asked good questions relevant to the subject. I don't understand why people seem to be mad at the congress people.
Gee, don't we have an entire division for this... Man, I forget what it's called... Oh wait, I remember! The NSA.
@@minafrota6124 👅😜👢👢
Mina Frota if the whole govt making itself look more ignorant and worse as it already is than TikTok counts as good questioning then well, you got some high standards there
@@mookiess Sorry
“does TikTok access the home wifi network?”
god help us all
The GOP in a nutshell
If everyone had that mans patience this world would be peaceful
@@Instabruh.User.. Obviously a bot
He should speak more against tiktok though. Tiktok is a horrible app and should be banned
Yes
@@Instabruh.User.. very convincing when you said (not a bot)
@@Instabruh.User.. bad bot
That lady asking the questions reminds me of one of those strict teacher you dislike in school that always cuts you off when he/she wants a yes or no answer
reminds me of my old teacher who got into an argument with my friend for "sending the wrong file type". she had to get the IT guy in because she didn't know how to right click and wouldn't let anyone else explain it to her. freaking boomer karens, the worst of both worlds i swear
Teacher was probably cutting off some kids bullshit excuse. The congress lady should actually want to hear the CEO's answer.
It stuff manipulators do, not someone who wants the real answer.
Now i understand the rage of a teacher whose student did the question right with the wrong method
Thats not comparable. That teacher is told how to do something by a book made by some boring idiot with no mind or freethought of his own. Lardfat lady was taking a question and completely askewing it into something different entirely.
They didn’t answer right with the wrong method. They did the wrong method, got the wrong answers, and flunked the test
That's subjective, i did that with maths answers and i simply used a alternative which i understood, that still worked. The teachers decided how to react to this (usually i just stuck with my methods and they eventually gave in, 'cause it just worked).
These congress lot were more like incompetant teachers going through the motions, asking a question but not letting anyone say more than the basics.
@@ricotta5753 the point is that they come to the conclusion that tiktok is detrimental to the world, but the wrong way, much akin to getting the right answer on a math question using a completely different method
@@Instabruh.User..you really are a bot
I’ve never wanted to slap someone so much in my life😭 that woman is hell
I feel like the main trend with any sort of congressional hearings is that it tends to highlight how ignorant and lacking in knowledge people in Congress can be things because they're out of touch; whether it's internet related, women's anatomy (I recall an instance of a congressmen thinking that the stomach somehow leads to the uterus), or video games (I.E. the old "video games make kids violent BS")
They thought what about the uterus!? I... what.
Congress is a direct reflection of the general population. This country is comprised and ran by low iq people.
Low intelligence seems to be the only bipartisan feature this country has
I have to see that "stomach uterus" thing because ain't no way a grown ass man said that on television, he will never get laid again, no matter how much money he got
I forget the details of the exact hearing but I believe it had to do with gynecology and hysteroscopies.
@@ManiacX1999 Given I frequently STILL see guys think girls can "hold their period in" like it's pee, and some grown ass men that are at least 30 think that pee comes out of the 'gina, I wouldn't be surprised if some congressman thinks the uterus is after the stomach, like, it's in the abdomen! with the stomach!
That sudden "does TikTok access home wifi?" after saying that logical rational statement hit me like a truck 😂
First time I heard that in this video, I promptly hit my desk out of frustration, lmao. Really thought he was onto something. 😂
Aight Mr pro hacker
I think what they were inferring is; does it look at the data of other devices than the one you are currently using for tik tok?
Because they rape our households personal digital information for advertising and I don't agree with it.
That's why i don't use Facebook, nor tik tok. RUclips gives me survey after survey trying to see what ads I would like to see since I don't share my data.
They believe Tik tok does more than keep data for advertising. I understand their point of view.
Any human can come to America and make a social media app.
Like a Chinese government ally that sends diagnostic ad data to China.
I have had tik tok install itself three times on my phone without doing it myself. I get ads for it all the time. I don't trust tik tok. I'd rather trust Instagram rather than tik tok. Although Mark Zuckerberg does the same thing except he a white boi.
Charlie almost snitching on his homie and then having to correct himself and put the blame on that dirty burglar was a great friend move.
Honestly, they asked good questions relevant to the subject. I don't understand why people seem to be mad at the congress people.
@@minafrota6124 Genuine question; are you trolling???
@@minafrota6124 I didn’t watch the hearing, because I couldn’t possibly care less, so I have no clue how relevant the questions were or weren’t. I’m just here for the jokes and memes.
@@mitspeithetc No.
@@VenosValentine Ok. Fair enough.
„If i breathe, will air enter my lungs?“
I dunno what to hate in this hearing anymore, either hating tiktok for you know, being tiktok, or the fact that these questions that were questioned to the tiktok CEO was just either self explanatory or just straight up stupid as some of them felt as if these questions were made by someone who doesnt know anything about social media taking a chunk of our social info and credentials.
Y E S .
it pains me to think of how many questions could have been asked that could have gotten us some actually valuable information and instead we end up with this 😐
It’s purposeful soft ball questions.
fr, if tiktok is actually evil and giving our data to china, this trial just made me like it more, simply because of the dumbass congresspeople
The ceo of the CCP does not answer questions correctly. So stop defending the ceo of the ccp. It's not members of the congress fault.
I really hope this shakes the public’s confidence in our elected officials. We’ve needed much better for a long time
Unfortunately the general public doesn't have the attention span to even remember 1 minute after watching it
@@darkstar8196 I'd laugh at this if it wasn't so damn true.
LMAO
I have no confidence in China's intentions - that should be main concern here.
These deliberations are just some public relations maneuvers. In reality, these questions are handled by intelligence and counter-intelligence, because it is on a scale of national security.
@@Sornemus it should be assumed that every powerful body will act in self interest. Because that is a reasonable critique of capitalism, and conservatives cannot accept growth, they will default to absurd racist presumptions.
It's kinda hilarious how out of touch the government with this situation
It's so sad, Japanese former leader was at computer building competition and crushed, we are so bad
*I’M BETTER THAN PENGUINZ0 LMAO*
Holy fak there's a landmine of bots.
Does a toaster uses power
@@epicthief ironically, japanese politicians tend to be more in touch with reality/the youth. It's ironic because the japanese voting demographics is so incredibly old.
Long beach Griffy has a skit about this and it is so accurate it's almost a 1 for 1 shot of the hearing.
as an 18yr old american girl from alabama (state with one of the lowest GPA’s and almost the worst education state-wise) i could’ve done better than them. and i have 0 idea how congress stuff works.
i also thought the same thing
Real I'm also 18 but from Texas and these people are absolute idiots
Then you could not have done better than them
@@applejuice9468 When the bar is set that low, a poorly trained dog would have been fine.
@@applejuice9468 she would, since she sees how stupid they are.
Mr Chew has made every Singaporean proud. To be able to sit through 5 hours of this comedy special without losing his composure, patience of a saint indeed.
Made people proud? He is the ceo of an app that is ruining a generation
he is Singaporean? no wonder lahh his accent sound like that 😂😂😂
another singaporean under charlie's comment section? lesgooo
The amount of Singaporean people is amazing and confusing at the same time
If he would, he would get exiled from US, since tik tok is hated for spying on its users and then killed by chinese officials.
I feel like Congress should have younger people who actually understand technology to do these hearings.
Unfortunately younger people don't have their pull and resources. So you have these walking raisins calling the shots when they can barely operate a touch screen phone.
Congress and the Senate both need a term limit like the President does. Unfortunately, doing so would require amending the Constitution, which will never happen because these scum sucking parasites will never willingly give up their positions of power.
any politician who doesn't know what wifi is needs to be sterilized
More of gen Z in congress??? Please god no
@@subifyouhatetiktokandreddit234 and you prefer boomers and gen x to be their? Let the millennials and zoomers in with what a fucking joke politicians in the US are this combo atrocity might do some good
the ceo is playing chess and the congresspeople are still reading the shoots and ladders instructions
I don’t like tiktok but that hearing did not make me want to ban tiktok, it only made my mad, sad, and scared that those were our congressmen.
I agree. I felt like I barely learned any reason to ban it.
One just has to look at MTG and how she got elected to tell you where the govt “intelligence “ is.
tbh the only way you can't like tiktok is if you almost never use it and only hear about it, otherwise after a few days, the algorithm will almost perfectly set up videos you're interested in and actually would like to watch, its only the random trends that pop up randomly and ruin it, one good concern tho is content creator equality and attention spans being hurt
Agreed, but it should still be banned or at the very least regulated so that they can't farm data and sell it off to bad actors.
@@spider-mancantsee5875 Republicans are notoriously terrible at doing their jobs, they aren't even qualified 90% of the time, maybe more. Republican base will literally elect anyone as long as they agree with their feelings on a subject. Banning abortion? HELL YEAH LETS ELECT THAT PERSON BECAUSE WE HATE WOMEN CHOOSING WHAT TO DO WITH THEIR BODY! (that's just an example)
It's hearings like this one that make you wonder if a popularity contest really is the best way to decide who governs us.
It's not even a popularity contest since Republicans tend to rig elections in their favor (by gerrymandering)
in america it is not a popularity contest, you just have a choice between two gariatric corrupt white guys who have the exact same policys, exept one of them just hates black people openly while the other tries to hide his racism
@@dragon_flyz it isn't
@@dragon_flyz its not but have fun with grandpa and grandma who can't even turn the volume up and down on their TV cause they're so fucking old they don't know what a remote is run this country. Being out of touch is proven to be detrimental to whatever you're running, whether its small like a company or huge like the entire fucking united states of america.
Only if most of the country knows what is a good criterion for governing, and they can pick and choose between more than 3 candidates. None of that's happening. It's names that get votes, not platforms
I just find it hilarious they’re mad at the privacy issues regarding a Chinese company owning tiktok. Meanwhile, ignoring who the American companies have been selling the same data to all this time anyway 🤣
Exactly, and they keep voting every single year to renew the Patriot Act as well that no one seems to care about. They are all hypocrites that don't actually stand for anything.
That's the thing though. American companies are doing it for money. China may or may not be doing it for political power.
The tiktok algorithm in America vs China are radically different. In America, the algorithm promotes gender confusion, blue hair insanity, and outright degeneracy. In China, the algorithm promotes education, resolve, and leadership.
Most Americans are too stupid to understand they are under attack.
Meta and other companies lobbied to remove tiktok so they get the revenue. It's never about the spying it's about who does it 😂
@@purplfedora800 it’s very likely they are. Shame these fossils can’t ask the important questions like that one and keep letting tech giants get away with abusing their consumers trust
US senator: Do you work for the CCP? TikTok CEO:No senator, I’m Singaporean… US senator: soooooo your Chinese right?