I still prefer f1.4 or f1.8 primes Especially EF mount glasses, so that i can use drop-in-filter adapters Single adapter with different drop-in-filters is way more cost-effective than my fear of using adapters😅
That’s interesting. I didn’t extensively test macro-ish shots but I didn’t see any issues in real life. Maybe if I was shooting charts or something I’d notice it’s not as sharp in the corners or something
Black Friday sale! Black Friday Sale: www.taylorjacksoncourses.com/black-friday-2024
28-70 and now give us 105 1.4 and the dream wedding combo will be born .
Bag the reviews, keep making more songs. That’s your calling. It on repeat in my car with the kids now. They keep saying oh F2!
Excuse me, sir I need that song on Spotify this instant
Oh damn, new winter banger dropped - f2, f2, f2 🎶🎶
Yep… you are a gifted musician!
that number was the best thing Ive seen, not a wedding photog anymore but you make it look fun
Thanks for the review Taylor....the 28-70 on one body and a 135 on another might be a pretty potent tandem...
@@paulgero I woke up thinking this!
Loved the intro! 😂
I would love a 24-50 F2… that would pair nice with an 85.
This!
for some reason I kept hearing f2, in the Mr. Krabs voice.
ditch the 35-150 and use this with a 20/105 combo depending on indoors/outdoors.
What bracket are you using with your GoPro?
This lens was born for wedding photographers
What plugin are you using to add natural motion blur?
I use Reel Smart Motion blur but I’m sure there are others as well
I still prefer f1.4 or f1.8 primes
Especially EF mount glasses, so that i can use drop-in-filter adapters
Single adapter with different drop-in-filters is way more cost-effective than my fear of using adapters😅
I still think the 16-35 gmii + 35-150 + 50 1.4 is the better combo
Pricing is supposed to be hella expensive…maybe picking up in a few years when it’s cheaper lol.
The Canon is on sale for $2799 so in 6 years expect the same from Sony with a sales price of $2599 - $2699
Gerald pointed out that the close up shots are really shitty quality, is that true with your test?
That’s interesting. I didn’t extensively test macro-ish shots but I didn’t see any issues in real life. Maybe if I was shooting charts or something I’d notice it’s not as sharp in the corners or something
This song is better than sex
Sony is just proving that they are better than canon every time ( coming from a canon shooter)
3:23 are you and Marshall Brothers?!? Are you and I brothers?! Am we brother?
🍕
@@TaylorJacksonPhoto oh good.
the music is fire ahahahahah
Almost $3,000 USD Yikes.
Carry 3 lenses worth $3,000+ or carry 1 lens worth $3000?
Hi
Egg Sandwich
$2,898.00 😆😆😆
lmao
Welp I’ll being singing the Sony 28 to 70 f2 song for the rest of the week.. and the next… and the next… “egg sandwich”