What I find particularly AMAZING is that the real deal looks exactly like the CGI mockups I've been looking at in the "configurator" for these past 2 years. I will say that it can look a little "IKEA", but I'm assuming their are leather options and other custom wood options in the design center at Comlux.
How about cabin pressurization. One important factor in private aviation is to have lower cabin altitude. The lower the better for passengers. Gulfstream has 3000ft cabin altitude in g700. how about this one ? I found unconfirmed info that this is below 6000ft which is significant higher than competition. Please can you comment on that ?
It all depends on what your missions are... Personally, I'll take a Global 8000 over this "airliner" and here's why... Although they claim a Mach 0.82 cruise speed, that is just marketing talking because that is its MMO and no one cruises an aircraft at MMO... I'd be very surprised if its "normal" cruise speed is even Mach 0.80, probably more like Mach 0.78 and then you need to know at which speed it achieves it so called maximum range of 5650 nautical miles, probably at Mach 0.76 or even less... A Global 8000 cruises at Mach 0.85 (typically) which is also the speed at which it gets its maximum range from or if you want to go faster, at Mach 0.90 (high speed cruise) or even at Mach 0.92 (super high speed cruise) and up to Mach 0.94 (its MMO). Typically owners will cruise at Mach 0.90 which is significantly faster than the A-220... The Global 8000's range of 8000 nautical miles a whopping 2350 nautical miles more than the A-220 and achieved at a much higher speed. Then there is the pressurization system... Although the A-220's cabin differential is higher than most other airliners, it is still not as high as the Global's differential which means the Global has a lower cabin altitude making long trips a lot more comfortable. Then there is the cruise altitude... The A-220 is certified to 41,000 feet where as the Global is certified to 51,000. This can make a huge difference when travelling westbound and the aircraft can climb above the winds, saving you time and money. Then there is accessibility to a kinds of smaller airports which generally a "real" business jet will have access to and not airliners that are modified into corporate versions because of weight and overall size.
I agree. This jet seems to be primarily marketed for the “look-at-me” factor vs functionality. Reasonably, a jet owner would need a second smaller jet for general use.
That must be why if you ordered today you wouldn't get it for 4 or more years, because they are already significantly back ordered by people that actually have the scratch to buy one. Sure it might take an extra half hour to get from NY to London, but let's be honest, a Global with 18 people onboard would feel like sardines in a can. (tight fit) where 18 px on a 220 is spread out. The ACJ is a Biz Jet meant for higher PAX capacity. If you just need to flit about with a couple of friends for a golf outing in Palm Springs, get a Citation. To each his own, both aircraft have their place. BTW I'd go for Dassault's new 10X or even the 6X before I messed around with Bombardier.
So much better than the small and cramped Bombardier / Gulfstream / Dassault products. And excellent value for money. Looks great too, way better than a BBJ.
I'm interested in the ACJ. Some pointers are fly by wire joysticks, new styling with nice woods, also generally newer looking. Some things I would look at over BBJ737
As a A220 flight instructor, 1st...PLEASE don't refer to them as "joysticks". They are "side sticks"! At my company, we stress..."this ain't a toy plane". The physical size of the cabin is what makes this jet unique. The fuel burn, at an airline cruise speed (and you're correct...we don't cruise at MMO... BUT WE COULD!) is about 2800 lbs/hr which is phenomenal. That's why we can fly our jets from coast to coast with only 109/130 passengers (-100 or -300) and still make money. It's great for long haul/low density routes or off season. It's also very quiet. Unlike the BBJ, its weight footprint is much less and thus allows more runway availability and ramps. Of all the jets I've taught over 25 years, this little bugger is my all time favorite "flying girlfriend". For what it's worth, someone noted "cramped Bombardier". This aircraft is a clean sheet design originally called the Bombardier C-Series before Airbus bought the division.
This looks FAR better than the renderings. But for $70-90M, the max altitude is very poor (41,000ft), the cruising speed of mach .70 to .75 is slow, and the cabin altitude is higher than new $20M private jets. Not to mention you have to land at large airports and small ones are out of the question.
Ill take 3 please. You can just leave them on my porch. Thank you. I like how we are like hmm i would rather have a 737 bbj. Like any of us can afford to fly in one of these. I am working hard to one day be able to fly in one.
It would be a hard sell over the 10X or Gulfstream considering the purchase prices are so similar ....It has less range , slower cruise speed , lower flight level and less cabin pressure All in exchange for more room and slightly lower running costs. So you can arrive later and less refreshed if you buy the 220 , not much of a sales pitch.
The 10X won't be available for a few more years, but you are right it's a sportier option for up to 8 pax. Once you start getting North of 10 pax though, the ACJ is going to have it's charms.
True , the 10X is a ways off but the major down side of the 220 is it gives up the "marketable" benefits of the smaller Gulfstream size jets ( speed , distance , altitude , cabin pressure) AND it also gives up some internal volume on the BBj's and ACJ's , its just a big compromise with no practical advantage unless the buyers want to lose time and volume. @@stevensims8922
There’s a reason there is this specific gap in the private jet market. There is a reason why for decades private business jets have remained relatively small…
Coffee maker supplied by owner not Airbus. You can bring what ever machine you'd like onboard and you don't even have to get it FAA certified at the cost of $500k. (see how that works)
A220 doesn't have that design. Considering the structural changes it probably wouldn't be feasible to see this reach market by 2025 which is when this one intended
I just can't have crew sitting in my living area. unacceptable. who wants to be around poor people. not even other poor people. andrew tate would agree nobody likes brokies.
My Filipina and I are looking to sell for Global 7500 I'm trying to find a Boeing 787 ER and have my Filipina build it the way she wants Gulfstream end Bombardier 7500 I am just sick and tired going into Kodiak are refueling in Japan you can never go Direct touchdown refuel immigration you will always piss away 45 minutes to an hour and 20 minutes to wait to read text so I'm hoping to find a 787 hopefully the next month or two
Can you get it maintained in the United States do people know how to work on it in the United States how much is insurance which the life of the airframe. What's the estimated savings and money for fuel give me some idea vendor now for you go I guess. What's the reliability safety bad weather record of the plane. You don't like Boeing's new plane that the door blew out and
lol sorry but the elite have already decided that it’s the peasants flying easyjet and Ryanair who are the real climate criminals. Have you ever seen what the airport looks like anytime there’s a climate summit? Private jets parked nose to tail as far as the eye can see.
You realise people who own private jets carbon offset x10 for everything they do. So not only do they have a better carbon output than you do. But they also contribute more positively to the environment :)
@@tmackenzie1 I didn't realize that, actually. Probably because it's not true. But the fact that you've actually been convinced that people who own Superyachts and Gulfstreams actually emit less carbon than the average middle class family who drive a Toyota and go on vacation to Mexico every five years really just does go to show people will believe literally anything.
So fly an outdated fuel guzzler owned by the airlines, who are pushing it to the maximum, or this efficient one. Sour grapes indicate what we all see as progressive, that airlines are losing first class to private charter, and those seats subsidise cheap ones, so the days of cheap holidays and weekend getaways may be nearing their end, meaning less airlines, less polluting old fleets, and an environmental win.
This is just right there, in my top 3 best private aircrafts.
What are the other two?
@@logic_bot3753 Bombardier Global 7500 and the upcoming Dassault 10X.
@logic_bot3753 probably the Gulfstream 750 and Global 7500
@@denziieyg700 you mean.
@@ARTDEVGRU247 correct
What I find particularly AMAZING is that the real deal looks exactly like the CGI mockups I've been looking at in the "configurator" for these past 2 years. I will say that it can look a little "IKEA", but I'm assuming their are leather options and other custom wood options in the design center at Comlux.
By far the best ACJ TwoTwenty video I have seen.
Thank you for sharing this beautiful aircraft.😊😊
I have to admit that once came upon the acj 220 I. Fell for the sheer beauty of her
How about cabin pressurization. One important factor in private aviation is to have lower cabin altitude. The lower the better for passengers. Gulfstream has 3000ft cabin altitude in g700. how about this one ? I found unconfirmed info that this is below 6000ft which is significant higher than competition. Please can you comment on that ?
It all depends on what your missions are... Personally, I'll take a Global 8000 over this "airliner" and here's why... Although they claim a Mach 0.82 cruise speed, that is just marketing talking because that is its MMO and no one cruises an aircraft at MMO... I'd be very surprised if its "normal" cruise speed is even Mach 0.80, probably more like Mach 0.78 and then you need to know at which speed it achieves it so called maximum range of 5650 nautical miles, probably at Mach 0.76 or even less... A Global 8000 cruises at Mach 0.85 (typically) which is also the speed at which it gets its maximum range from or if you want to go faster, at Mach 0.90 (high speed cruise) or even at Mach 0.92 (super high speed cruise) and up to Mach 0.94 (its MMO). Typically owners will cruise at Mach 0.90 which is significantly faster than the A-220... The Global 8000's range of 8000 nautical miles a whopping 2350 nautical miles more than the A-220 and achieved at a much higher speed. Then there is the pressurization system... Although the A-220's cabin differential is higher than most other airliners, it is still not as high as the Global's differential which means the Global has a lower cabin altitude making long trips a lot more comfortable. Then there is the cruise altitude... The A-220 is certified to 41,000 feet where as the Global is certified to 51,000. This can make a huge difference when travelling westbound and the aircraft can climb above the winds, saving you time and money. Then there is accessibility to a kinds of smaller airports which generally a "real" business jet will have access to and not airliners that are modified into corporate versions because of weight and overall size.
I agree. This jet seems to be primarily marketed for the “look-at-me” factor vs functionality. Reasonably, a jet owner would need a second smaller jet for general use.
Cool, guess what? None of us could afford either and anyone who could afford one could buy both if they wanted.
That must be why if you ordered today you wouldn't get it for 4 or more years, because they are already significantly back ordered by people that actually have the scratch to buy one. Sure it might take an extra half hour to get from NY to London, but let's be honest, a Global with 18 people onboard would feel like sardines in a can. (tight fit) where 18 px on a 220 is spread out. The ACJ is a Biz Jet meant for higher PAX capacity. If you just need to flit about with a couple of friends for a golf outing in Palm Springs, get a Citation. To each his own, both aircraft have their place. BTW I'd go for Dassault's new 10X or even the 6X before I messed around with Bombardier.
small entourage gets small plane.
@@stevensims8922Bombardier designed the A220 😂
WOW FANTASTIC ENTERTAINING, & TRULY INFORMATIVE, I WILL BE CONSIDERING IT, THANKS FOR POSTING/SHARING AWESOME VIDEO REVIEW.
What a great video, thank you
That is a beautiful bombardier c series
excellent. i'll take two.
So much better than the small and cramped Bombardier / Gulfstream / Dassault products. And excellent value for money. Looks great too, way better than a BBJ.
Yea much slower too. People want speed
How so? This is around Mach 0.82 cruising, a Gulfstream is usually Mach 0.85 to 0.9
Not that big of a difference...
@@sholkyMMO …
Small and cramped? You can't fit to sit comfortably in a Bombardier / Dassault?
Funny because this is effectively a Bombardier
I'm interested in the ACJ. Some pointers are fly by wire joysticks, new styling with nice woods, also generally newer looking. Some things I would look at over BBJ737
As a A220 flight instructor, 1st...PLEASE don't refer to them as "joysticks". They are "side sticks"! At my company, we stress..."this ain't a toy plane". The physical size of the cabin is what makes this jet unique. The fuel burn, at an airline cruise speed (and you're correct...we don't cruise at MMO... BUT WE COULD!) is about 2800 lbs/hr which is phenomenal. That's why we can fly our jets from coast to coast with only 109/130 passengers (-100 or -300) and still make money. It's great for long haul/low density routes or off season. It's also very quiet. Unlike the BBJ, its weight footprint is much less and thus allows more runway availability and ramps. Of all the jets I've taught over 25 years, this little bugger is my all time favorite "flying girlfriend". For what it's worth, someone noted "cramped Bombardier". This aircraft is a clean sheet design originally called the Bombardier C-Series before Airbus bought the division.
This looks FAR better than the renderings. But for $70-90M, the max altitude is very poor (41,000ft), the cruising speed of mach .70 to .75 is slow, and the cabin altitude is higher than new $20M private jets. Not to mention you have to land at large airports and small ones are out of the question.
You assertion RE airports is incorrect. Further, let me see you put 18 people on your Phenom. Good luck with that.
@@stevensims8922 So can I land this plane at airports where only jets land?
the ACJ 220 needs 5000 ft to take of at MTOW sea level@@Majahanak
sorry for BBJ, this is really amazing n the price is better compare to BBJ or Golfstream
Ill take 3 please. You can just leave them on my porch. Thank you. I like how we are like hmm i would rather have a 737 bbj. Like any of us can afford to fly in one of these. I am working hard to one day be able to fly in one.
Much better than a G7 or 7500
Larger yes. Better? Not in any relevant aircraft performance categories.
But cruising speed slower than G7, 7500 & 10x.
@@briansoan9694 SFO to Europe is doable. SFO to Singapore need a stop in Tokyo. First world problem of the top 1%
Thank you 🙏
I think the tv will fall down when plane takes off isn’t ?
This is amazing
Nice
My only question,can it landing on teterboro such airport?
Amazing!
Another poke in the eye for an increasingly aimless Boeing, isnt it ? This aircraft will do well, deservedly so.
I think this one is competing with the embraer lineage 1000e
Wow Great Air Craft
1400m takeoff distance
Beautiful ❤
very nice
Top 1
Nice aircraft but the nautical miles doesn’t make sense. Its too low. Should’ve been 7500 atleast so you can travel the world nonstop
What is the range. I want to buy
How much???
❤❤
Interesting how Airbus isnt interested in bussiness jets. Nice looking Bombardier C series. I'd rather have a GX 8000.
Serious Question: Why is there no EVS?
It would be a hard sell over the 10X or Gulfstream considering the purchase prices are so similar ....It has less range , slower cruise speed , lower flight level and less cabin pressure All in exchange for more room and slightly lower running costs. So you can arrive later and less refreshed if you buy the 220 , not much of a sales pitch.
The 10X won't be available for a few more years, but you are right it's a sportier option for up to 8 pax. Once you start getting North of 10 pax though, the ACJ is going to have it's charms.
True , the 10X is a ways off but the major down side of the 220 is it gives up the "marketable" benefits of the smaller Gulfstream size jets ( speed , distance , altitude , cabin pressure) AND it also gives up some internal volume on the BBj's and ACJ's , its just a big compromise with no practical advantage unless the buyers want to lose time and volume.
@@stevensims8922
There’s a reason there is this specific gap in the private jet market. There is a reason why for decades private business jets have remained relatively small…
Private business jets have been getting bigger and bigger. What are you talking about.
Imagine having the cash for this!
For the rich guy on a budget.
Range ⁉️
I'd add 2nd guest lav
😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
Dorthy Extension
Alfreda Junction
les gars reprenez les vidéos sil vous plait
A Nespresso ? Really, cash for a decent plane but ick for coffee. Airbus can't really have that as an option
Coffee maker supplied by owner not Airbus. You can bring what ever machine you'd like onboard and you don't even have to get it FAA certified at the cost of $500k. (see how that works)
Hii rinku nice please bhubaneswar odisha like price 80 million
2000 nm less range then the G700
ACJ 220 match the demand of private jet by Airbus Corp.
If this aircraft is meant to operate out of smaller airfeilds why no airstair ???
A220 doesn't have that design. Considering the structural changes it probably wouldn't be feasible to see this reach market by 2025 which is when this one intended
The ACJ does have the option for airstairs, no worries.
I just can't have crew sitting in my living area. unacceptable. who wants to be around poor people. not even other poor people. andrew tate would agree nobody likes brokies.
Kirk Parkway
Kihn Plaza
Duniya ki jannat
London bridge
I'm just glad that the carbon tax I'm paying on the 400 liters of fuel I need per year will protect the planet from a few of these things lol
Dickens Pike
He or She
My Filipina and I are looking to sell for Global 7500 I'm trying to find a Boeing 787 ER and have my Filipina build it the way she wants Gulfstream end Bombardier 7500 I am just sick and tired going into Kodiak are refueling in Japan you can never go Direct touchdown refuel immigration you will always piss away 45 minutes to an hour and 20 minutes to wait to read text so I'm hoping to find a 787 hopefully the next month or two
Can you get it maintained in the United States do people know how to work on it in the United States how much is insurance which the life of the airframe. What's the estimated savings and money for fuel give me some idea vendor now for you go I guess. What's the reliability safety bad weather record of the plane. You don't like Boeing's new plane that the door blew out and
Hall Carol Lee Kenneth Taylor Donna
Selling a jet worth Millions and he refers to the boss as a man. Not living up to the Airbus Standard.
There you are. Only took time to find you busy body, touch grass.
Peek Capitalism.
Anyone, who rides this should be taken to court for emitting to much Co2.
Fly first class if you really need to.
lol sorry but the elite have already decided that it’s the peasants flying easyjet and Ryanair who are the real climate criminals. Have you ever seen what the airport looks like anytime there’s a climate summit? Private jets parked nose to tail as far as the eye can see.
You realise people who own private jets carbon offset x10 for everything they do. So not only do they have a better carbon output than you do. But they also contribute more positively to the environment :)
@@tmackenzie1 I didn't realize that, actually. Probably because it's not true.
But the fact that you've actually been convinced that people who own Superyachts and Gulfstreams actually emit less carbon than the average middle class family who drive a Toyota and go on vacation to Mexico every five years really just does go to show people will believe literally anything.
CO2 is plant food. End of the B.S.
So fly an outdated fuel guzzler owned by the airlines, who are pushing it to the maximum, or this efficient one. Sour grapes indicate what we all see as progressive, that airlines are losing first class to private charter, and those seats subsidise cheap ones, so the days of cheap holidays and weekend getaways may be nearing their end, meaning less airlines, less polluting old fleets, and an environmental win.