Police are using Amazon's facial recognition technology. Privacy experts are worried.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
- The Washington County Sheriff's Office in Oregon is using Amazon Rekognition to help track down criminal suspects. Is it a breakthrough in policing or a dangerous precedent against privacy? Read more: wapo.st/2Jc1SUN. Subscribe to The Washington Post on RUclips: wapo.st/2QOdcqK
Follow us:
Twitter: / washingtonpost
Instagram: / washingtonpost
Facebook: / washingtonpost
the people doing this are servants of enforcement....not freedom, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness...the enforcers
Arguments like "I'm supportive of this because we use it responsibly" are naive and dangerous because the law isn't there for that user, it's there to prevent nefarious users. And no, forget it if it's under the umbrella of a single organisation. It's either got to be open source or fully auditable. Seems scary how little consideration appears to have been given to the wider consequences of this system
It’s only metadata, where have we heard that before?
Andrew Ober-Reynolds eddy snowdy?
Great, now we're just like China. Did anyone hear that part about retrieving images off of home security cameras?
Easy there. It is creepy as hell, but they were talking about sources for images, not direct pipes. Like someone robs your house, you give the cops an image from your security cam and they can search from there. Just saying that it isn't tied to only one type of input.
Which is a stupid as thing for the report to even mention the way they did.
@@grakkerful Yeah I get that but still, it wouldn't be that hard to do.
I also live in Washington County, Oregon. I do not think this is a privacy issue at all.
When I was a police explorer in the 1970's, I walked into a detective's office and saw at least one hundred high school yearbooks (multiple copies) going back for many years.
Years later I realized that the police had the names and “mug shots” and general locations of tens of thousands of innocent children who had never committed any crime.
There are too many right-wing extremists, war hawks, psychopaths and sociopaths in government. It's only a matter of time before they start scanning jr. high school yearbooks into their systems.
If it is not expressly prohibited, they can and will do it.
Incidentally, the year books were still in their shipping packages and labels so much so that I realized that the publisher had automatically shipped the year books to the police.
Isn't Facebook a police term for mugshot album?
Their nonsnese about metadata here is such a lie. The NSA can make all of ths data do what it wants after the fact. Propaganda.
"Pull in pictures from Facebook and RUclips"
DANGER!!!!
I work in AI, I've also written a thesis on personal metadata. This is the key everyone should be concerned about 3:16 "We are not sending pictures to the cloud, only measurements" The human eye recognizes another person based on these same measurements. So the point is moot. This is about the laws that protect people through their personal data, and how to get around it. AI will turn your walk, your mannerisms, your nervous ticks, that way you laugh, your associations to others, your travel patterns, your clothing choices into "measurements" and will use it to uniquely identity you wherever you go, and none of this algorithm based metadata will be considered 'personal' , therefore fair game. Be warned over fuzzy warm terms like 'measurements'
2:20 so simple a cop can use it... That inspires heaps of confidence.... 🤦♂️
As a Portland native, I can confirm that Washington County's law enforcement is a joke.
BTW - OJ's mugshot at 1:14
Good catch.
This is why I don't use Amazon and for the people that use Amazon aren't going to realize the danger until its to late
0:35 plus drivers license pictures
So why are their still innocent people in jail or prison
I am sorry but I am for it. Only criminals should worry about this technology.
QUANDO VOCE VAI NO WALMART, CADA ALA QUE VOCE VIRA A CAMERA TIRA A SUA FOTO.
Facial Recognition Technology will only ever be as good as it’s inventor/creator/engineer/programmers. Some of these creative geniuses also claim that life as we know it is just an algorithmic simulation on a much grander scale.
With that said, maybe we should put it to a vote whether the cops should be qualified to play with such a toy like this
Still falty
How about the center of grsavity of the measurements. two variables per face. (x,y)
Jeff Bezos looks like an undercover detective for one of those NY//LA detective shows
‘So simple a cop could use it’ that says it all.
I think so much has changed over the last few decades some are good and some are bad, but as technology progresses there has to be a level of healthy skepticism to ask the question to whom in society does it really benefit, is it the whole community at large or only a few at the top gets the piece of the pie and what are the mechanism to balance out those groups in a fair and just manner, these sort of technology needs to be evaluated, debated and put into a vote by the public because it is concerning to see how much power the government have on the individuals nowadays even in a democratic society.
I don't know if you guys have known the patterns already, first they introduced finger prints globally (by globalists), then non-consent full body searches and now this so called 'Facial Recognition' technology, so what's next implant a chip into our brain. I think any individuals in society ought to ask and start questioning when is enough because it is starting to get ridiculous and intrusive not the betterment for society though.
And get this, why then almost all the government (no matter what type of government structure they are, e.g. monarchy, democracy, oligarchy, authoritarianism, or totalitarianism) in the world wants Facial Recognition technology at the same approximate time period and why they all claimed to be for so called 'prevention for terrorism act' and why implemented so quickly without public consultation, evaluated, debated and voted, does it really solves terrorism or a new smart way of pushing a agenda 21 or depopulation for the few at the top? Why do all government not matter what type they are seemed to agree with such intrusive technology though, who is behind the curtain on these decision? Because out privacy is as fragile as our existence. We the people need to ask questions and question them to the very essence of it.
agenda 21
this is nothing new. Ring door bell does the same thing.
Guess i need outpatient contour ism.
...if enforcement means more than... freedom, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness...go for it
God hates adulterers as also liars.
The only thing u need to worry is amaxon ties in russia.
So Cool 👍👍
Does anybody remember East Germany before they took down the Berlin Wall !
Half of US population must have to report to nearest police station for verification of illegal doing soon once the police have this technology.
If you have nothing to worry about, why does this bother you??
Old arguement, do better.
Violation of privacy. The more we allow big tech to violate our privacy the more power and leeway you give the big tech monopolies which could (and in my as well as many other peoples opinions) eventually lead us into a 'Big Brother is Watching' society as described in the book 1984 by George Orwell.
Sneakerhead Farb technology has improved our lives and make a better world.
@@cryptobuzz1680 I work in high tech, you don't need to tell me that... Just because it has made our lives easier does not mean we should bend the knee to big tech monopolies and let them control our lives, what we see, what we do, etc.
@@sneakerheadfarb7046 facts
If you are NOT a CROOK why WORRY???
Because at least 33% of people in jails are innocent. Hopefully it’s never happens to you.
@@Studio-ch3qc Prove it and NOT say and post it!!! and that does NOT mean I disagree miscarriage of Justice do Happen on the INNOCENT but here we are talking about Hypocritical & Crooked Politicians
Also what constitutes a crook you could be put under surveillance for entirely political reasons Martin Luther King is a great example of that
@@andrewober-reynolds9184 MLK is righteous so no worry for him
because I have a right to my privacy!