‘Absolutely Not’: Expert Challenges Alex Murdaugh Defense’s Two Shooters Theory
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 фев 2023
- Prosecutors called their last expert witness back up to the stand Tuesday afternoon in Alex Murdaugh’s trial. Dr. Kenneth Kinsey, a crime scene investigator, testified about the defense’s two shooters theory presented during their case. “I cannot include or disclude two shooters,” Dr. Kinsey said explaining that the defense can’t make these claims either.
#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
Bravo, Dr. Kinsey! You OWNED the defense!
Has anyone noticed that Alex never had said he’s eager to find out who killed his wife and child but he’s just saying he didn’t? If I was innocent I’d be saying please find out who did but he’s not even caring
Well, when you're being accused of killing them that kind of shifts the focus.
Great point !!!
Yes. As whiny as he was about himself in his testimony, not once did he indicate any thoughts about the fact that the prosecution is wasting time going after the wrong guy. He knows he's guilty.
@@marclaclear6628 I disagree. I’ve seen the falsely accused gladly say “lock me up, I don’t care, just so long as you keep looking.” The problem is they usually don’t if they have tunnel vision. If he’s not guilty, he should be saying that so they’re looking elsewhere
I’ve been thinking the same thing. It’s crazy!
I also wonder why the state has not mentioned that it asked Alec while on witness stand unless I’ve missed something.
It’s possible the Prosecution will use that in closing arguments! Bam!
I keep waiting for Alex to say “That’s not how it happened!”
Ikr me too!
I feel like he mumble it under his breathe when they were explaining how it happened with the gun
Only on Perry Mason.
He’s like that son of a hamwich knows how I did it!
IKR. I was thinking he can't exactly defend/ explain why he went into the doorway to shoot Paul from behind (because he couldn't face shooting him face to face?)
I LOVE Dr Kinsey!! He's so fun to watch and isn't allowing them to change his opinion!!
He is formidable!
AND BRILLIANT.
Yes. He's good. But I bet he's a bit crazy
@@usaloveme The only crazy person in that room is Alex Murdaugh.
Agree! He’s an excellent expert to have on the stand. Formidable and unshakable.
Professional, knowledgeable, and well-spoken. Dr. Kenneth Kinsey is the latest powerful witness for the prosecution.
Even his double negatives were backed by science. Truth.
Great witness! Dr. Kinsey knows his stuff and was confident in his answers.
BOOM! Goes the dynamite! 💥
Well done Dr. Kinsey and the prosecutor who questioned him. This was a really effective and efficient questioning and testimony.
This prosecutor is the State Attorney General
Lmao all these comments are the same. Do you not have the brain or sense to at least entertain other possibilities? I swear you don't belong on any jury
@@keithfrazier8616 Good to know. Thank you. And the defense attorney is Sen Harpootlian? I think.
@@keithfrazier8616 oh wow!!
@@keithfrazier8616 Had to come in when the case was imploding
I cannot tell you how much I loved the, "are you kidding me? A cone Mr. Griffen. It shoots out a cone pattern". Lol. That was great!!!
This prosecuting attorney did a great job asking questions of Dr. K.
I’m glad he got a chance to shine!
That's the Attorney General of SC - dude decided to roll in and ask some questions.
@@smelfungus thank goodness for that!! Best day
AG... the biggest gun.
@@smelfungus It's his specialty, as a matter of fact. Good call.
Alex is beginning to look like a guilty man at that table.
Dr. Kinsley is the best witness the state has called!! I would love to meet him he’s so knowledgeable & respectful griffin didn’t stand a chance & he looked so defeated on the cross exam
I’m lovin’ this witness.
👍👍
He’s awesome!!
What a great witness. Informed. Smart. Knows his stuff.
Another no nonsense witness for the prosecution! Destroyed the defense theories through and through!
I tried to talk to my husband last night about blow-back. He is a hunter his whole life. I just cant see the pellets changing direction. They would have stayed on the same path they had outta the barrel.
I dunno how he got cleaned up so fast though.
Wendy 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
It doesn't matter if there were 2 shooters, because Alec still coud have been one of them. The 2-shooter theory doesn't get him off the hook.
He doesn't need to "get off the hook", the prosecution needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did it. Presume innocence.
It does matter because it shows that the prosecution’s theory of the case is wrong thus creating reasonable doubt that what the prosecution said happened did in-fact happen.
Alex and Buster
@@katy4343 SAME!!!
@@katy4343 Buster was in another city the day of the murders.
He's as guilty as O.J. Simpson !!!
Oj was never charged for Nicole murder
So he’ll be walking free soon?
@@jimlahey3919 OJ was found not guilty. There is no verdict of innocent. It's either guilty or not guilty The OJ verdict was incorrect as anyone with a functioning brain stem knows.
@@giama7618 Charged yes. Covicted no.
@@giama7618 Lol what? Yes he was
Good witness for the prosecution.
Why doesn't Alex just tell them how he did it?
I don’t think he wants to spend the rest of his life in prison maybe
A narcissistic psychopath can never ever tell the truth. It's not in their nature, satanic nature.
@@sarahjane8949 😂
If he's convicted he will appeal and appeal and appeal
@@nancyfahey7518 All prisoners appeal but it’s not going to get him any freedom
ALEX SHOT PAUL FIRST ,MAGGIE HEARD HIM SCREAM,LIKE A GOOD MOTHER WENT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENED TO HER BOY SAW HIM ,AND TOOK OFF RUNNING WHEN ALEX SHOT HER
That's a horrible way to die, to see your son get killed and worse is from the people you trusted (granted it was AM).
Exactly
I think he shot his son and before the wife knew what was happening she was being gunned down by a high powers rifle.
She was shot in her front side first.
Horrific 😥
The hit was on Maggie. Paul wasn’t supposed to b there. Y’all jus make things up to suit your fantasies. This is reality.
Alex looks nervous to Dr Kinsey saying" I cannot exclude the possibility of a 6 foot 4 inch shooter"
I believe Alex was sitting in the 4-wheeler when he shot both of them. Pulled the shotgun from under his blue poncho and shot poor Paul first and pulled out the other gun and shot his wife. Remember that Alex is a long time hunter and I'm sure knows how to handle a gun and shoot quickly. Plus there were tread marks on Maggie's leg, which I believe was from the 4-wheeler.
@@deethegardengirlI think he rounded the side of the feed room, crouched. I think Maggie was either in the 4x4 on her phone or in the hanger. He was squatting but on his feet and shot Paul who was fooling on his phone. I believe there was yelling and I think Alex was hysterical during this but also very determined. Paul took 1-2 steps, Alex advanced and shot again while he was standing up (possible also that he was holding the gun low to hide it in the jacket), he leans the gun on the outside of the door then grabbed his second gun which was set up on the side and as Maggie is coming towards the shots (and other noise), he gets her in the leg to stop her-I think it was a hesitation shot and a shot to stop her from moving, she goes down on all fours or whatever, likely grabbing her side headed down with her shoulder folding and he keeps going. He finally goes behind and does the second kill shot as she’s going flat on the ground. Jacket comes off, wraps both guns in it and I think he took the 4x4 back to the house quickly and accidentally ran over her in his haste. Strips totally naked outside (maybe keeps his drawers on) and goes inside to shower and change asap.
The whole load of evidence goes in the car and he hides it in the parent’s driveway/outside area before going into the house. I believe he called his brother for help disposing of this stuff (see: four wheeler ride) but that he brought some of it inside (maybe the guns, maybe just the jacket) and tossed the items that were never found. Maybe burned the clothes. Guns were in the woods and removed later.
Omg, this guy is killing it. Jim Griffin must’ve been having a masochistic moment letting this witness humiliate him so thoroughly.
😂
I was embarrassed for Jim Griffin....
Jim Griffin has been striking out now for weeks..BTW, his specialty is Insurance Defense, hehehe. NOT CRIMINAL DEFENSE. Jim Griffin is a friend of Alex's and I think Harpo added him to the team b/c he thought he would be able to massage/handle Alex more effectively AND both Harpo and Griffin were Paul's attorneys for the boat case...So much baggage in this trial Defense-wise...
Hello
Go
A lawyer with 35 years of experience knows to use two guns to throw suspension off of him and act like it was two people. Remember the boat incident with two drivers...he knows what he's doing...
Creating doubt!!
Great point
Totally agree
Not only that but he would have had to reload if it were only a shotgun and chances are he might miss with a single rifle or single shotgun to make sure both were dead.. a shotgun was used for close proximity guaranteed effect and a fully loaded rifle for further distances he had no time to spare. he may have missed with a rifle even at close range 2 shots from a shotgun was for maximum efffect within that radius he then fired mutiple rounds with the rifle and followed up with a shot to the head. the weapons werent only chosen to throw off the single shooter they were used for a quick and effective as possible execution
He and Dr Ellen are freaking incredible. They both know their onions and watching the defence try to bully them and failing is fantastic. I wish I could buy them both a pint….but, seeing as I’m in the far north of Scotland on a wee island, that’s unlikely!
I would take a pint.
😂
Sounds lovely I bet it's beautiful too. Scotland a beautiful country.
So many of our Southern ancestors came from Scotland. God bless you.
Na bother lad
Alex doesn't look very happy, in fact he bites his nails like his son..looks worried..this witness knows what his talking about..
Dr. Kinsey quickly added that Paul was comfortable with whoever shot him.
Interesting that he would divulge that…
when ? time stamp it
So you’re saying it could’ve been one or two friends of his from the boating accident or the crazy groundskeeper. But the most realistic scenario is that two shooters caught them off guard and that’s why u don’t see any defensive wounds. If u had one shooter Maggie and Paul were so close to each other that if one shooter did it one of them would’ve witnessed the other die and would’ve had defensive wounds even if it was Alex that did the shooting.
@@alexsosa5727 That’s assuming that Maggie was right there when Paul was killed.
How likely was it that 2 other shooters managed to get a hold of 2 family guns to commit said murders?
Alex testified that Paul didn’t have his guns with him when they rode around or at the kennels.
I'm from walterboro South Carolina I'm 50 years old this is been going on for years this is not just started last week this family has been doing this stuff for years so yeah but what I'm so happy about to see the Judge that they have on the Stand when I go home in June my Uncle works at the courthouse I would love to get a picture
It's good to hear from someone who knows that family
I don't know them personally but it's a small town so you always hear about what's going on if you look into it you will actually see stuff
I had wondered if that was the case. Very connected, very entitled and plugged in everywhere and with entitled personalities is never a good thing
Very obvious, the judge is not part of the good old boys club
You are right. Thanks for posting and enjoy your trip home in June.
If this expert doesn’t talk sense to a person, they are not listening and nothing will make them. 🙈🙉🙊 He’s likable, too.
Very likeable and confident in his work
Dr. Kinsey effectively used science and logic to refute the defense's ridiculous and unfounded theory!
Oh yeah, like how a bullet doesn’t make a hole. Or that a round bullet hole won’t mean it’s flying true. Something like that, come on, some of his testimony is junk.
Q: “Can you include two shooters?”
A: “I cannot include or exclude two shooters”
= Reasonable Doubt
Prosecution just blew it!!!
@@PhotosynthesisBisector1 Disagree, just refutes the defense b.s. "theory" that there were two shooters to try to deflect AM's murderous crime.
@@ohthelovelypoems I agree. He basically just said one shooter could have done this or two shooters could have and that refutes the defense witness who said only two shooters could have done this. When looking at all the evidence in totality it's unlikely it was two shooters.
@@PhotosynthesisBisector1 You gotta look at all the evidence in totality. This doesn't add any reasonable doubt when you look at all the other evidence showing Alex was the sole shooter and this guy just refuted the defense witness who said only two shooters could have done this and not one.
That attorney's combover is amazing!!!
Objection! Relevance.
My thoughts exactly🤣
When he looks in the mirror, it makes him feel like he has hair. Good for him.😊
That's technically not a comb over. Comb overs on balding men are when hair is taken from one side (or the back) and combed over a balding area in an attempt to look like a full head of hair. His is just parted on the side. A true comb over would start above the ear or from the back and combed over the whole top of his head. I realize I'm taking it seriously, but just thought I'd explain.
@@Jrh770 🤣🤣🤣
When AM said the person who did this had planned it for a long time, he was correct. I think he planned the two shooter defense beforehand and thus why he used two different guns. These were very well thought out murders, except for Paul’s surprise social media posts.
Nice they are making Alex relive his deeds a thousand times.
Alex could literally solve how this happened and tell them which side is correct
You're inferring he's guilty. The verdict hasn't been read yet
@@mikey50469 , 🙄sarcasm was the intended context
😂😂😂😂 I agree with you
@@mikey50469 oh yea we are definitely “inferring” that he is guilty. He is
@@mikey50469 If the verdict has been read, can she then infer guilt? Commenters all over You Tube channels have been inferring or outright stating guilty and not guilty regardless the stage of the trial. Would you have the same response if someone posted he's not guilty before the verdict has been read.
"Well Said Dr Kinsey"..
Kenneth Kinsey is a solid witness; very analytical and knowledgeable. Prosecutor is excellent too.
This witness is flowing with confidence and enjoyment
Loving his 15 minutes way too much
And experience.👍
One shooter. Two guns, two dead. Rifle slung, shotgun in hand. Paul first, shotgun put down, walks to other side of building, shoots Maggie. All under 20 seconds.
Gets ready for his crocodile tears as the prosecutor starts this questioning.
Well done Dr. Kinsey. He’s a very smart man taking no nonsense approach and one if not the best witness for this case.
Agree! ☺️
This witness destroyed the defense that there was two shooters.
This witness is on his game
I love how Alex Murdaugh is sitting there grimly, watching his crime reconstructed before his eyes.
This expert was phenomenal.
The look on AM face tells the whole story. He is guilty as they come.
Correct
Good luck defense team. You are representing a monster.
Old dude looks drunk and full of high BP…
@@joannanightingale4466 You are totally and utterly wrong Paul does a Snapchat or something down the kennels with no signs of being frogmarched to his death
@@sarahjane8949 Yet. 15 minutes later he's gunned down by his father.
They know it too. That's why they do not want to go to Moselle.
Angela Hall-thank you for that.i have tried to describe AM and his choices. He is a MONSTER!HORRIFYING AND HEARTBREAKING.😢😟
Love this days testimony and prosecutor. Still floors me as to how many people were allowed in and out of the house, in and out of the crime scene before and after a double homicide!! Entitled?!
Not entitled sloppy investigating.
More like inept.
It reminds me of the JonBenet investigation. They had everyone including their preacher.
Hi
AM wanted people there. Did none of his family say, what if the killer came in, is it a good thing to be here? AM is detail guy. Why the trip with his son around the property, creating tracks. AM is always calculated. A criminal mind, looking for opportunity and with the means. Had housekeeper tidy up, she should have known netter, she had been in law enforcement. Local police should have cordoned off the whole estate as a crime scene. Something dead about AM in his heart, so only left with a brutal strategic hot mess of a brain. Compassion and shame, he has not access to.
That demonstration was brilliant. You can see on AMs face that he knows he’s been caught lying again.
I love the judge. He continually overrules the objections of the defense.
That's not necessarily a good thing.
Love the Judge
Giving the defence grounds for appeal.
That’s not a good thing at all lmao. Nice going paralegal eagle.
Another wannabe law expert aka true crime mom
That’s some good testimony against Alex.
Dr Kinsey is the best! Well done!! 🙂
I absolutely luuv this witness. ☺
We see him "cry" but has anyone ever scene a tear? I haven't.
I saw 2....both times he stuck his hand in his pocket, manhandled an onion then touched his eyes.🤣🤣
@@colleenoloughlin3970 😂
Did anyone see Alex fleeing the SEEN of the crime? Sorry. Couldn't resist that.
Dr. Kenneth Kensey, so far is the star of this trial. He was engaging, personable, informative, effective, unflappable and a crime scene investigator, who seemed very confident, in his abilities to address, explain and support his findings.
He was the Dr. Janeen DeMarte, of the Jodie Arias trial (if you watched that trial)
Not to mention, that accent he has, lol. I am Canadian, so not sure what accent he had, but I could listen to him just talk, over and over and over again. What is that accent? I love it! ❤️
Extremely interesting man, with a fabulous accent, taboot, lol.
Dr. Kensey gave, for me, the most impressive and interesting testimony, yet.
That is the southern "low country" accent. Slow and clear.
It's a Southern accent...we have a drawl. But in the South there are many different dialects... We know where each other are from by our accents and our dialects... we are VERY interesting & I love being from the Great South! Nothing better ❤
Thanks for responding, as to where such a lovely sounding accent comes from!
In a way, I feel sad for the folks, that speak with that accent, and then don’t hear it and the get to enjoy it, like I can, lol ☺️
Low Country of SC. Very slow and gentle. In the upstate we sound a lil different 😀
@@purepoison618 they get to hear and enjoy others around them.
EXCELLENT!!! 300 shells from months ago and 300 shells around Maggie's body. Both from the same family gun!
I am so worried that one juror will say, “I think he did it, but I don’t think the prosecution proved it.”
Often the other jurors point out reasons he she is guilty and they change their mind. If not hung jury.
I feel sorry for that one having to live in that town .
Uggggggggg!
I think there is a good chance.
I think he did it but I think there is a good chance the jury will hang.
I think it will be interesting that they will know that they are deciding the fate of a man that will already go to jail for life.
I wonder if it will make some feel easier about voting NG against their conscience because they don’t have to worry he’ll be a danger on their streets.
But alternatively it may make some people vote guilty if they are pretty sure he did it but might not be beyond a reasonable doubt. After all…even if they are wrong the harm is minimal because he was never going to breath another free breath. It’s not like they are denying a free man his liberty. Just adding 2 more counts to a life sentence.
@TMG: Then you’ll never be on a jury panel because many, if not most, domestic murders are decided on circumstantial evidence because the only witnesses other than the killer are dead. As a juror you would have most serial killers and family murderers walking free.
Dr. Kinsey did an excellent job!! I was also impressed with the lawyer for the prosecution!!
If Paul had passed the killer he would've tried to fight even after being shot once. It makes no sense that the ki((er past him and went inside turned right around and down to deliver the kill shot.
AM murdered his wife and son in cold blood for 1 reason….The walls were crumbling in all around him.
Defense is doing nothing but angering people now. The prosecution experts are more believable.
He's just replicating some of the swamp topography that's prevalent in the Low Country.
How is the prosecution more believable with 0 evidence pointing to nothing ! all I’ve seen through out this whole trial is maybe , could be , what IF . Both sides are horrible . This should’ve been over weeks ago . To much money being made now so it will be drug out several more weeks
@@steelerfanmattt5150 We all have opinions.
Yes!
The defense team’s desperate.
“Expert witnesses” can be PAID to come up with any theory. I hope the jury doesn’t fall for any of the defense’s nonsense.
Anyone who watched the Depp case should realize that after seeing Dr Smeagle and the poor excuse of a forensic psychologist they had oppose Curry. They’re literally just paid to say what the defense wants the jury to hear. Hope nobody takes them seriously
This guy has taught me! He knows what hes talking about and not afraid of defense. alex really sweating listening to this witness
Clearly see why defense is trying to keep this guy off stand again!
Well, this is the 1st time I've seen the defense attorney start looking worried 14:22
Anything to create doubt in just one juror.
I hope they are keeping track of his LIES.
Haha like jurors care about doubt hahaha
People get convicted with reasonable doubt every single day.
Kinda hard not to. Pretty much everything he said was a lie lol
@@1stAmendmentorDie1776 I take it you never served on Jury duty
@@jeffb.4800 it only takes one to doubt
Agreed and I’m willing to bet they discussed it!
Right on Dr Kinsey!!
Alex's brother is a lawyer and he knew good and well how crime scenes are cleaned up. He was simply trying to create sympathy.
You are 100 percent correct. They are all guilty of lying 🤥. I pray 🙏 the jury sees through these entitled people and gets them for all of their crimes against the house keeper, the young Smith fella, etc. So wrong how his son and brothers are liquidating his assets too. That should be a punishable crime also.
His brother that testified IS NOT A LAWYER!! He works in Equipment Sales…owns two businesses. Stay with the trial folks. Cripe.
Not a Lawyer but they've played him all his life. Yes, they've played him all his life.
@victoriaEish He has 2 brothers and John Marvin is not a lawyer but Randy is
Randy is the lawyer. John Marvin testified. He owns equipment businesses rental properties.
He was the best part of the prosecution's case and it's a good thing that didn't let it end off with his brother's charming testimony!
I wonder if A.M. is seeing all this in his minds eye, like a movie.
The lady caring for his mom claimed Alex had a fresh injury in his forehead
He is a s innocent as oj. His sons instagram or snapchat along with phone data will be the death of this mans innocence.
I really hope your right but I have a horrible feeling he’ll be not guilty.
This prosecutor seemed lighthearted and calm unlike the other hostile ones
S,c. State attorney general, Alan Wilson. Hes been there everyday with state team
Well we all know that the defense is just trying to get some type of reasonable doubt in the juror's mind's
That's what they are supposed to do.
There is a ton of reasonable doubt and only circumstantial evidence.
This was one of the first instances I thought I was watching a murder trial and not a financial one.
That is the idea, is it not?
Honestly…even I, as a lay person, was like…how can you possibly say what you are saying to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty? You seem to be giving a theory Will some conviction that you probably shouldn’t be so certain of.
The defence didn’t have to provide a description of how they were killed. But they CHOSE to put someone ridiculous on the stand to talk about a 5’2” assailant. But even as he was describing it…I was like you don’t know anything about the position of the assailant. People can crouch and kneel. In fact they will commonly kneel to steady their aim. They can trip, they can fall.
And you are expecting me to believe that a brain was shot at point blank and was left mostly intact as it left the skull in the direction OF the blast to land behind the assailant?
That doesn’t make sense to me. I would have laughed in the face of the prosecution if they tried to proposed such a specific theory. And the defence, rightly, would have torn it apart.
I feel like the defence has been trying to prove that it COULDN’T have been him physically because they have to admit that it realistically was him practically. I think the prosecution struggles with everything beyond the fact that he was the only one with access to the means and the opportunity. Those are the strong parts of their case…but the more the defence tries to make it seem IMPOSSIBLE that it could have been him…the less I believe them in ANYTHING they say…even the strong points. And the defence have barely touched the means and opportunity.
@@jessjess23brooks89 if I was on the jury and heard that Alex admit to lying at being at the kennels I’d automatically vote guilty from then on
I notice harpootlian self soothed by rubbing his hair when Dr. KINSEY recalled what Alec did to his family
Alex found them dead and didn’t mention thinking the killer might have been till on the scene waiting to kill him…he wasn’t worried about that because he was the killer! He wanted it to look like somebody relates to the boat case wanted those two dead
@@streetracer2321 be IS the killer lmaooooo
@@ESBEAUTII ok, so you know your comment is false and you’re just diverting
Love how knowledgeable and well spoken this man is.
In a perfect scenario the clothes he was wearing during the SnapChat video would have been submitted as evidence. All his lies, nothing to hide, nothing to lie about
The EASY way to figure out how it all played out is just ask AM.
What in the world must Buster & AM’s siblings think now? Cannot imagine!
Alex or Alec looks worried! As he should
This might have flipped me from not guilty to guilty honestly. Wow
But at the same time it doesn't entirely prove Alex was the one that used the family owned firearm.. hmm
You guys see the way that Alex always tears up instantly and his jaws start shaking every time they talk about or reenact the murders? He's guilty and we can all see it in his body language...
Exactly
Yepp. From 0-100 every. single. time. Unnatural indeed
He literally started biting his nails during the demonstration which I found interesting.
If people were talking about how someone murdered your family, you may likely tear up. Yeah?
@@JR-kc8jx well he's guilty as I said...
Why Alex was not watching the demonstration? Did it hit home?
The man Did it .... The glove will fit
Yes!!!! Great job Dr.Kinsey
he's biting his fingernail and realizes that it looks guilty when the expert was talking about shooting thru the door frame
Love this witness
DNA doesn't lie. Only the family's DNA was found at the crime scene.
Well apparently according to the defense, the shooter was 5' 2". Somebody should find out where Shakira was that day. 😂😂
Hopefully this will answer questions that many have had here about police not collecting "remains".
Did you hear an answer? I didn't! It was so disrespectful!!! To Paul and his loved ones!
@@BH-1964 law enforcement is not allowed to clean up a crime scene.
@@bbrcummins1984 after collect evidence, take photos and CSI people...once search warrant or crime scene are finish and will be return property to owners or landlord thats thier responsible to clean up, sold out or leave vacant
WHO EVER 'S JOB IT IS/WAS FAILED SO DISRESPECTED TO PAUL & MAGGIE.🌹🙏🌹....👎
@Patricia Flores It's the job of the coroner and clean up team, who may not have been there yet at that point. I'm not sure. The scene should have been secured though, so the scene would not be visible to those not involved.
This could be all over if he would produce the clothes and shoes he wore that night. Unless the 2 shooters took those too 🙄
he has proved Alex Quilty!
He does love quilts
I agree (but it's guilty)
Yes!!
Thank God some one not afraid of straight talk.
Saddest part. Is how he used the life insurance off the maid and never give a penny to her children. Lied to them and act like he’s still working in their case.
if the shooter was sitting in a golf cart it could explain the upward trajectory of the pellets.
This witness is crushing it!
Bring back the death penalty for AM
GUILTY
GUUUUiiiiLLLLTYYYYYY!!! 😡
Why this court allows any of the attorneys to get up during the other sides testimony I will never know. I have never seen this.
Ikr? It's crazy ..
They’ve been wandering around the courtroom. So weird.
It’s allowed in this situation so they can see the monitor that is showing the evidence. The court isn’t showing all the evidence to everybody, only the jurors. If any of the evidence is broadcast to the lawyers monitors then the people sitting in court would be able to see it.
I haven't either,it's rude.
Dr Kinsey and Dr Reimer’s theory makes more sense to me. I’ve always been told the exit wound is always much larger than the entry wound
Did you notice that Alex is guiding and telling his lawyers what to say/ask cross examination. Apparently he knows more than what he is leting us know.
I’d say he has a pretty good clue about everything X-man
I’d say he was up close and it was personal.
He planned it ‘for a very long time’….
Yes, I noticed that.
Yes I noticed. Moreover:they are still talking in details about how Paul was shot and AM doesn’t cry anymore, he makes notes and talks to his lawyer. He is over his fake grief! He is so guilty
It doesn't make sense for the shooter to walk into the room and shoot from behind. His footprints would have been on the blood spots that were in that room. He said that this door is WIDER. did you see how they both struggled to squeeze into that doorway that's WIDER than the feed room door?
Did they not say Paul stumbled forward? Which would mean out of the room. Also it’s possible the Alex did not want to see Paul’s face when he finished him off.
Agreed. Why would the shooter take the time to walk past Paul and turn around, after already shooting him from the front, and then shoot him in the back of the head? It would be a time waster for the shooter.
@Zeballos he said the shooter was inside the feeding room and demonstrated that he slid in beside Paul as he was falling to explain the awkward upwards shot. But he wouldn't have fit let alone shoot him while doing so
@@zeballos5757 that’s what I thought, at least he had a mini ounce of soul in not wanting to see his son face while he was shooting him. What a monster.
Dr Kinsey well done!
It would have been priceless if they had said Paw Paw instead of Paul while reenacting this. Alec would have lost it.
Daddy and Buster both chew their fingernails... what's up with that?!?
Maybe buster is guilty too
Umm, they are father and son. Family members share characteristics and habits. I’m sure there are things you do that your parents do without thinking.
@@ggcatbelladogantics2959 well, my daddy and I aren’t murderers, so there’s that….
Outwitted by the truth