@@ElusiveTy wtf are you talking about, I didn't say anything about race dipshit. And if all feminists are retards all y'all incels having nothing better to do than cry about feminism are retards too 😂. Seriously never seen the level of stupid I've seen from y'all incels.
Here I feel like I have to be edgy and say that human rights, just like the tooth fairy and the value of money, are a fiction. They are a useful fiction that everyone believes in because it helps make liberal capitalist society run smoother, but that does not make them any less of a fiction. Rights are not natural or inherent. They are a social construct, arrived at by struggle between social forces. The right to vote, the right to commodified private property, the equality of people before the law, the right to privacy - these are all socially useful fictions. If anything they are one of the basic ideologies of liberalism. But just because most liberal democratic societies accept these shibboleths today, does not make them any less constructed. Historical societies before liberal capitalism did not have human rights as an accepted concept either. It is only with Anglo-American ideological domination of international institutions in the post World War period that there was a significant naturalisation of these ideas. But it really does show the power of naturalisation of ideology that people accord human rights with a supranational, almost supernatural status. At the same time, we really do need to be aware of the fact that just because an ideology is naturalised, _does not mean that it will stay naturalised forever._ As the model of Western neoliberal capitalism is declining, so too is its ideology of human rights. But just complaining that countries like the DPRK or the PRC or the RF or Sub-Saharan African nations don't give 2 shits about human rights _does not make the case for human rights any stronger._ Human rights have to be struggled for and they have to be maintained by the society that "believes" in them. Like any ideology, they are susceptible to being overturned. If anything it means that these rights must be fought for even more vocally, and struggled for both in and outside of government. You only need to look at, say, Citizen's United to see that actually, the equality of people before the law is increasingly becoming irrelevant. The decision was one made by politicians bought and paid for by corporations, written by lawyers to basically give corporations powers and freedoms above and beyond that of actual people. The right to free speech is also under attack. Hell, check your social media and corporately owned media platforms. Are social media algorithms and moderation _really_ protecting free speech - or are they channelling it towards corporate ends? The right to privacy is basically dead, and we gave it away voluntarily by allowing smartphone technology to be dictated by for-profit corporations instead of arriving at how technology is to be implemented by a democratic process. Hell, even the right to vote is under attack by redistricting (gerrymandering) and voter suppression as well as increasing the stringency of requirements to be able to vote. Like all social constructs, rights are only rights if you fight for them. I would go so far as to say that neoliberal capitalism has gotten to the point that it is even now finding liberal democracy to be a "problem" for its continued upward wealth redistribution. Public health requirements for tobacco advertising are a "problem" for multinational cigarette companies so they sue the government of Australia. Privacy laws are a "problem" for Google so they harvest your data in other ways using metadata and network analysis. Personal property is a "problem" for software and entertainment companies so now they "rent" software and multimedia to you for consumption - you don't own it and can't modify or edit it. Do not rest on the naturalisation of human rights and watch passively as neoliberal capitalism slowly obliterates them in the name of profits. Illiberal regimes like the DPRK should be called out on their lack of human rights as well, but the struggle begins at home.
Malthias ,well said. I agree with where you’re coming from I would have to be blissfully ignorant to ignore the fact that companies are slowly trying to overpower human rights and nullify them. And the fact that certain groups of people are actively pushing for more government control just because of certain things they don’t like or the they just want to be catered to at the expense of other groups, is a rather frightening aspect. The fact that these vocal minorities would rather to suppress human rights in exchange for a bigger government control leads to a “slippery slope” if you would. The fact is that if people want to continue to enjoy they’re un-infringed human rights they need to actively fight for them and not roll over just because it’s “more convenient”.
Yeah, some people were either asleep during history classes or were never taught history. There's been more than a few female heads of state throughout history, but sure Kim's baby sister or Clinton would have been the very first! Just like Black Panther was the first black superhero...
Merkel fked up the entire Europe by mass-importing middle eastern "workforce" who didn't want to work and they started pushing them to other European countries when there were too many for them to handle. She also is the reason Germany now has energy crisis as she decided to close down their modern and expensive nuclear power plants. She is not a great example of "Good female leader." Lmao
I wouldn't doubt that they are under the delusion that she would be more compassionate to the people of North Korea just because she is a woman. Or that somehow if a woman is evil and tyrranical that it means she's a bad-ass.
@@VestinVestin In a weird way, that was progressive. Nobody seemed bothered she was a woman relative to her disastrous economic policies, and her ignominious departure wasn't seen as any kind of proof that women are inherently unsuited to leadership.
@@ConarCZ Not even that. She's just the only other person next in line to rule since Kim Jong Un's son is too young. She wasn't chosen by anybody, not even the party.
I find it highly problematic that we’re calling this strong, beautiful, ruthless woman a “dictator”. This is my official petition to change it to “Pusstator”.
The fact that Shoe0nHead/June is a based liberal makes pretty much every politically-aligned person's head spin. The Conservatives are like "How can you be a liberal?" and the Liberals are like, "How can you be based?"
Funny how people still think it's better to look for physical attributes instead of actual skill, competence and experience. It's not that hard, people. I swear, my actual retarded brother learns faster.
"North korea has a female leader before US" Meanwhile the queen of Britain, the president of Slovakia, Etiopia, Georgia, Singapore, Estonia, Croatia, Lithuania, Trinidad, Marshall islands, Tchaj wan and queen of Denmark: "are we a joke to you?"
Not to mention Norway, Finland, Iceland... Actually, most of Scandinavia... Germany, New Zealand, Australia had a female prime minister already but doesn't currently, Sint Maarten, Taiwan - So many countries have female leaders or have had them, sometimes several of them. And the countries with female leadership (elected female leaders at least, can't speak for hereditary rulers like queens, but in a constitutional monarchy they're largely figureheads anyway) are overwhelmingly the ones doing substantially better socially, economically, and wrt healthcare during this pandemic. Fancy that. The USA is so behind the times and has such ridiculously low standards, but they still think they're world class lmao
People can shit out a dumb twitter comment but can't use the same internet to educate themselves and learn about the world around them The world is at my fingertips, and can only be 250 characters long
To be fair the English queen isnt exactly a 'leader' she has very little power compared to past monarchs and is kind of more a figure head, but i get chu
“North Korea is the only country with a woman in charge!” *Laughs in tea and biscuits* Edit: I love the amount of countries that have a female leader and yet they still pretend that North Korea is special
In America, there are poor people, middle class people, and rich people In North Korea, everybody but the leaders are poor so everyone is equal Such a progressive country that beats us out
Twitter: we've never had a female leader! Me: What about the thousands of Queen's, Princesses and Lady's that Europe has had? Funnily enough, that's the same category Kim's sister is in..
@slothkingn1 that's only half right. At the beginning of each monarch's reign, they sign over the profits from their lands to the government, and the government adds that to their budget. Taxes are also added to this pool of funds. Then, money is reassigned from the government's budget to the maintenance of the Royal Family and their estates. Their contribution to this budget far outweighs the amount they drain from it. Further, to your first point, this doesn't even count the amount contributed by profits from tourism to Royal estates.
Especially when there's virtually no repercussion for what they say, yet they act like they're being brave. It causes second hand embarrassment for me.
I dare not ever look into the comments on Twitter. My brain can’t take it. But I do love how shoe perfectly puts their text into the voice I imagine all twitter users have when they’re “owning” people. Did I say that right? Do the kids still say “owning”?
I blame an invisible genie for the last one. I'm not even from the UK, but I vividly remember wishing for her to be PM and seemingly to everyone's surprise, including her own, she became one about 2 months later xD.
@bokudensuduharagmail Did you know that most of those tweets barely had over 10 likes... Thats some over whelming support right there! While Trump talks about putting chlorine in your blood system to get rid of the "Chinese bio weapon" and gets thousands of likes, am I the only one that sees how the extreme left holds no political power yet the extreme right does?
@bscrazy007 Reddit is full of sexist and racist gamers does that mean all gamers are that? Also how can one prove that? I looked for a survey for the amount of radical feminist that is in feminism but couldn't find anything and that's really the only way I think I could prove something like that
@@gamer7916 but also the state executes you, should you try and vote for anything or anyone else... or not vote at all. that sounds more like North Korea, a place where people literally get murdered for not expressing enough anguish at a dictator dying
This is how neoliberalism co-opts actual grassroots leftist movements with good intentions and appropriates them for the acquiescence of power. It reinforces the hierarchy and incentivizes more divisiveness. Actual feminists are anarchists and don't believe in hierarchy at all, let alone female supremacy, unlike fourth-wave liberal feminists (aka feminazis).
It prompted me to look up how many siblings he has. His oldest brother was assassinated for wanting reform and going to Japan. He apparently wanted to see Disneyland and disgraced his family in the process.
justanothergamer 101 or she like looks at these people being dumb and forcing there opinions and wrong beliefs on others but not all females are like this
Reminds me of a couple of years ago on Reddit. There was a thread about Kim Jong Un calling Trump a "dotard". Took me about five minutes to scroll to the bottom of the comments section. It was just a wall of "WELL, HE'S NOT WRONG..." I lost count in the 70's and it kept going. Like, at least 70+ people thought they were the very first person to think of that... hilarious(?) comment.
I really remember reading how feminism started. One of the first books wanted to "replace" the ideology of seeing women and men as opposites, somehow like a Clash. This book was published in France around the XVI century. They wanted to abolish that view and *start* looking over options like... equality.
This is prefeminism, tho. The very first glances about the moral ideology of gender. When they weren´t trying to survive other aspects of life like poverty, job and freaking goverment.
These people are just extremely distant from reality. A scary Korean dictator woman is the type of character we would all love in a movie, except this is real world with real people suffering from dictatorship.
@Alfie Martin Nope. It has never killed anyone and they have repeatedly said they would never use their nuke except in retaliation of an attack on their sovereignty. I can't stand the insanity, the smugness of liberals who recognize that the USA is a warmonger that strongarms any nation that tries to forge an independent path but are still somehow afraid of a tiny country that just wants the USA to leave them alone.
Oh man, I laughed so hard throughout this whole video 😂😂. The button, the women’s touch, the LET THAT SINK IN with the door opening and the floating sink picture👌👌, sooo good! Made my day. Thanks June, I really needed that ☀️☀️!!
You ever heard of the movie "The Madness of King George"? True story: it was originally a play called The Madness of George III. When it was sold for the movies, the studio execs retitled it because the thought people would see the title and wonder "when were the first two in the series?"
Same. You can always count on the weebdom to make animemes out of anything and everything. And the damn quality is so high too... Like somebody spent hours and hours on drawing dictator-chan with bread in her mouth.
“nOrTh KoReA iS mOrE pRoGrEsSivE tHaN tHe US” The millions of North Koreans who have almost no freedom and are literally starving to death: Are we a joke to you?
Soviet Union: collapses. Korean republic: pls help everything is gone, the harvests where fuck, we are dying. The west: lol commies no food I hate you from the depth of my heart.
Rootless Cosmopolitan it doesn’t “praise itself”, it was forced into such a state by the situation it found itself in. You know close to nothing about a country and yet still choose to assume that it deserves the continued hostility of the worlds greatest power. Bravo, fucking bravo.
@Rootless Cosmopolitan Learn your history instead of repeating US propaganda. Why is the korean republic the way it is? Some demonic commie overlord turned them all into robots? Did they pursuit a doctrine of self-reliance because they want to feel badass and strong? You know nothing!
@GamerGiraffic Dude, you should learn some history ffs.. Germany only wanted Danzing: Danzing or war? (They wanted to go against the Soviet Union) Poland said fck off, war. 3 days later France and UK declared war to Germany and started a big, european war. So, the allince bring Europe to war. They even lied to Poland, promised help just to refuse Germany, and then did nothing but let the polish bleeding on the front. They wanted war really badly.
So when I see a video like this my first question is "what message is this video sending? What opinions will be reinforced or challenged?" Shoe should tread this water carefully. This isnt 2016. We're past strawmanning feminists by looking at sketchy Twitter posts. Let's evolve the debate.
The Umbridge example was actually pretty good. Everyone hates Umbridge and it would be a nightmare if she were in charge. I think that comment was actually on the anti dictator side
The most stupid part is that these feminist act like there had never been a female head of state. Completly ignoring the 22 women that are head of state right now. But i guess the US never had a female head of state and the US is all that's important so germany, Bangladesh, Norway, Namibia, Nepal, Myanmar, Taiwan, Estonia, Serbia, Singapore, New Zealand, Iceland, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Ethopia, Georgie, Slovakia, Denmark, Belgium, Bolivia, Finland and Greece don't count.
It always hits me, as the current state of "progressivism" in US - when it will happen (woman leader), it's gonna be huge, festivals, parades and "we lead the free world", "first as usual", "Next step for the human kind", while literally half of the world will be - "Wat?". Half of Europe get women in charge on daily basics, and nobody even notices.
@@thegoldenduck3765 How did you get that idea? Mitsotakis is merely the party head of the nea dimokratia party. Sakellaropoulou is the president of the country.
I’m from a Southeastern European country where we don’t only have a female prime minister, but a lesbian female prime minister. It should be paradise according to these liberals? No. Our country has been turning to sh*t the past few years, it’s becoming less democratic as we speak. There have been massive protests the past few days against her, the president and the other people in their party because we don’t wanna see our country deteriorate any further, but I don’t even know if it can go more south than this. Being under dictatorship isn’t fun even if there are women in charge. The only measure for somebody to be in charge should be merit, country’s governments shouldn’t be viewed in the same way as some random company that should fill it’s diversity quotas.
@slothkingn1 Most democratic countries have both, you just don't hear much about one or the other depending on the government type, e.g. president of Germany or prime minister of France.
@slothkingn1 Actually, as Jadeed pointed out, there are plenty of countries, even well known ones, who have both. It is just that only one of those offices holds actual power, depending on the system. France has a presidential system, so you hardly ever hear about the French Prime Minister since he does not matter. Germany has a parliamentary system with the Chancellor as the equivalent of a Prime Minister, so you hardly ever hear about the German President (who holds mostly ceremonial powers). Russia, presidential system, so again, Prime Minister of Russia is hardly ever mentioned (except when Putin took over that office so he could still be in position of power until he was done with changing the constitution to allow himself yet another presidential term later). My country (Croatia, right next to Serbia, and yes, the original post was about Serbia) has parliamentary system, so the Prime Minister is the one in charge, while the President holds mostly ceremonial powers.
Here's the interesting part of the internet being global: People not from your country are going to look at your internal politics as nothing but fun facts. Your openly gay PM is very cool to Reddit because they don't have to actually give a shit about her policies. She might be a dictator to you, but to the rest of the world she's a "step in the right direction for the LGBT" despite her not being elected, her using her position to protect her millionaire brother, her being an underling to a fascist president. History will remember her for being openly gay and a prime minister which is exactly what your president banks on. It's amazing how useful these idiots are.
I read the book Nothing to Envy: Everyday lives in North Korea. The vast majority of women there are starving, scrounging for ways to make money and live in fear of the police. There’s no feminism because everyone is treated like a slave. Unless you get really good test scores and get to go to Pyongyang
@Tetrimas From my personal experience, I have preferred having female bosses than male bosses. In general, I think women are better at managing people, while men are better at managing projects. This is all averages, obviously.
It's ridiculous. Sex doesn't make someone automatically better or worse, that's the whole point of egalitarianism that should be a focus of some feminists.
@@alrune8 not to mention there's a story in history of a woman who was made a leader due to the surrounding kingdoms killing her husband... Her response was to basically genocide the surrounding kingdoms, showing absolutely no mercy to civilians, women, children, etc... Forget the name but she burned a few major cities to the ground.
@@alrune8 Hilary Clinton proved this back when she was a lawyer by defending a man who raped a teenage girl and getting him off free of charge. She still plays the feminist card because she thought that would get her more votes.
it’s almost as if they don’t GAF about the reality of the situation, like AUTHORITARIAN RULE, so long as a woman is in charge. because then, they’re at least not sexist right?
The sad truth is that they are ignoramuses who probably don't know the first thing about what goes on in North Korea. The first they likely heard of it was Trump's dealing with them, and since Orange Man Bad, North Korea must be an okay place.
And to be fair, it doesn't go like this: Kim Jong Un dies, and Kim Yo Jong just becomes the next Supreme Leader. Yes, in theory it would be her spot, but in reality the generals wouldn't let that happen and would basically have a power struggle between themselves, most likely assassinate Yo Jong and seize power for themselves. And the propaganda machine would feed their lies on what happened, to the public and everyone would be... nay, act happy. Because if you'd protest, well... :D
I love how some of those tweets literally said: "north korea might *elect* a woman". Elect. As in, democratic process of choosing someone to lead them. My god how sheltered are these people?
You clearly don't know North Korea on the DPRK they in fact hold elections granted there's only one person on the ballet and no one else has tried or at least the north Korean government has never told us if anyone has ever tried to run but technically elections no matter how unfair.
@@MaskinJunior wait since when did kim jong un not look like he knew what he was doing...? i mean i guess he seems a bit chubby but that doesn't mean he's incompetent as a *ruthless dictator* lmao
People who focus on peoples race gender etc above all else are kinda dumb, here in the UK we have had two female prime ministers and they have both been terrible. I'm not saying that a female prime minister can't be good, gender is just not an important factor to consider in a prime minister, you should vote based on policies and what they stand for.
I can explain. That is a wahmen and not Trump therefore she cannot possibly be a dictator. This PSA brought to you by the council of infuriating fucksticks who had their brains switched with lemons at birth.
She'll get elected. And by elected I mean she'll be the only person who is on the ballot and if you don't vote for her you and your family will be sent to a labor camp.
@@ladycommentor2536 yeah, andd it's funny, because a lot of 2nd and 3rd world countries have already had a female leader and they are still 2nd and 3rd world countries.
@@nikolaynicolasnikolayevich doesn't change... Male or female as long as they don't really do what is needed to be done to become a better country nothing will change... I don't care much if what gender the president would be... As long as he or she had to do his or her job well... That all that matters...
A lot of these femanists don't seem to know that the world has had many women rulers over the thousands of years, Europe in particular has been flush with them, but they don't like that being pointed out because then it becomes all about their merit as leaders and not pAtRiArCy.
naw man the "democratic" "republic" of North Korea definately holds elections with competing parties every 4 years. The Kims are just literally gods thats why they keep getting elected. (yes this is sarcasm)
ONI Section Zero actually there is an election every 4/5 years but the Kims are actually the only party that is allowed to candidate to the election. And every citizen is forced to vote for them, so yeah not democratic but there IS an election.
Not knowing her a few days ago isn't even the worst thing as one can learn quite a lot of things about a person even within the span of a few days. Worst i'd say is them making shit up. I mean, nothing is known about the woman to begin with.
She has been the leader of the Propaganda and Agitation Department for a while now. She is an experienced leader who is definitely not going to be any less strict than the current dictator.
@@lred1383 That was not my point. My point is that most of these "liberal" twitter accounts probably havent done any reasearch on her to know if she is a strong leader or not and just jumped on the "yaas queen" wagon (which is fucked up cause she is still a dictator)
"I can't wait for Trump to deal with a strong female leader in North Korea." I'm preeeetty sure he's going to do the same thing he did the first time. Remind her that his big red button is bigger, actually works, and would use it.
And then talk about how great she is despite their constantly threatening to Nuke each others countries. And agree to some favors in exchange for them agreeing to terms that they agreed to 30 years ago but can't be trusted to follow, and then act like he stopped World War 3 despite him trying to get into a dick measuring contest is what got people worried about it to begin with, and the previous president would have done the same thing if the party praising Trump now had consistent opinions on how to deal with North Korea.
Also, these feminists need to get a grip. There have been female elected leaders of countries before (ie. Thatcher, Merkle). And there have been plenty of non elected also(Queens). Get over it we lost this race long ago.
I mean to be fair I think they're arguing that it's sad that a backwards country like NK is winning that race. ...not to say that it isn't hilarious that they can't seem to understand the reasoning as to why that is.
@@Zakatak-mf4iq There've been quite a few elected female leaders in non-Western countries (Philipines, Argentina, Liberia etc.) in the past 2 decades, so their sadness about the 'progressiveness' of "backwards" countires is far too late.
@@pitmezzari2873 okay, but theyre saying its because of feminism that she would become leader of north korea. But its because shes blood related, the sister of a dictator. NK being a dictatorship itself is despotism. Someone being put in a high position of power because they're your family is still nepotism.
@@jake.g1 yeah, I get it, but nepotism is only possible in case of an otherwise "democratic" system. Like with Pope elections in the past, where cardinals would vote for their relatives.
@Marc Ruffalo almost like something bigger than corona happening were learning of more traitors every few days kinda crazy like this flynn case and now obama oh boy its getting spicy
I may not like the guy, but at least there was CHOICE involved! They’re getting whoever they get, no ifs, ands, or buts! I wish these people understood that
So when I see a video like this my first question is "what message is this video sending? What opinions will be reinforced or challenged?" Shoe should tread this water carefully. This isnt 2016. We're past strawmanning feminists by looking at sketchy Twitter posts. Let's evolve the debate.
@@joelsytairo6338 there is a subset of feminists that hate men so much that they would welcome a dictatorship as long as the dictator was a woman, because they believe that women are just so much better than men that a woman dictator would just make everything better. The rest of the feminists call these people liberal feminists, white feminists, or TERFs.
@@Nerobyrne Of course. The question I pose is 1. Is this subset of feminists statistically significant enough to be represented of feminism as a whole? 2. Are satirical Twitter comments an accurate representation of their arguments? and 3. Are their voices worthy of being platformed on this channel or does it serve to strawman feminism to the causal viewer, leaving her opposed to something she does not fully understand?
The fact that she isn’t even going to be the leader makes this 1000x better
Everything started when the fire nation attacked.
@@CarpetHater I think she isn't because Kim is still alive. If he was dead, yeah I think she would be next in line.
GS72 apparently you didn’t see her running with bread in her mouth she is so cute ( jk I know it’s fabricated )
@@alinac5512 Yeah, no. Get your race shit out of here, all modern feminists are retarded regardless of colour.
@@ElusiveTy wtf are you talking about, I didn't say anything about race dipshit. And if all feminists are retards all y'all incels having nothing better to do than cry about feminism are retards too 😂. Seriously never seen the level of stupid I've seen from y'all incels.
Yo Jong puts the "cute" in "Execute the entire village."
This comment is amazing. I'm still laughing uncontrollably right now. Thank you.
"You don't understand. She killed them *all* "
"not just the men, but the women and children too."
XD
@@essay2111 Because she doesn't discriminate
@@essay2111 very progressive.
No, they aren’t “beating” us at feminism, they haven’t even gotten started on human rights
They might be beating something.
That's what i call speedrunning
@@frag2k12 yes inmates in camps lmao
they traded their human rights for feminism. that's what all feminists want.
@@MrDimitri71 they did a sequence break lmao
"For years we were terrified and oppressed by men. It would be wonderful to now be terrified and oppressed by one of our own."
-- The Onion, 2009
Hahahaha!, just what I was thinking!
another prophecy fulfilled
oh shit forgot about that one
Best comment on this video😂👌🏼
I remember watching that one
Women’s rights? Hell, North Korea doesn’t even have human rights.
Equality
Here I feel like I have to be edgy and say that human rights, just like the tooth fairy and the value of money, are a fiction. They are a useful fiction that everyone believes in because it helps make liberal capitalist society run smoother, but that does not make them any less of a fiction.
Rights are not natural or inherent. They are a social construct, arrived at by struggle between social forces. The right to vote, the right to commodified private property, the equality of people before the law, the right to privacy - these are all socially useful fictions. If anything they are one of the basic ideologies of liberalism. But just because most liberal democratic societies accept these shibboleths today, does not make them any less constructed.
Historical societies before liberal capitalism did not have human rights as an accepted concept either. It is only with Anglo-American ideological domination of international institutions in the post World War period that there was a significant naturalisation of these ideas.
But it really does show the power of naturalisation of ideology that people accord human rights with a supranational, almost supernatural status. At the same time, we really do need to be aware of the fact that just because an ideology is naturalised, _does not mean that it will stay naturalised forever._ As the model of Western neoliberal capitalism is declining, so too is its ideology of human rights. But just complaining that countries like the DPRK or the PRC or the RF or Sub-Saharan African nations don't give 2 shits about human rights _does not make the case for human rights any stronger._
Human rights have to be struggled for and they have to be maintained by the society that "believes" in them. Like any ideology, they are susceptible to being overturned. If anything it means that these rights must be fought for even more vocally, and struggled for both in and outside of government.
You only need to look at, say, Citizen's United to see that actually, the equality of people before the law is increasingly becoming irrelevant. The decision was one made by politicians bought and paid for by corporations, written by lawyers to basically give corporations powers and freedoms above and beyond that of actual people.
The right to free speech is also under attack. Hell, check your social media and corporately owned media platforms. Are social media algorithms and moderation _really_ protecting free speech - or are they channelling it towards corporate ends?
The right to privacy is basically dead, and we gave it away voluntarily by allowing smartphone technology to be dictated by for-profit corporations instead of arriving at how technology is to be implemented by a democratic process.
Hell, even the right to vote is under attack by redistricting (gerrymandering) and voter suppression as well as increasing the stringency of requirements to be able to vote.
Like all social constructs, rights are only rights if you fight for them. I would go so far as to say that neoliberal capitalism has gotten to the point that it is even now finding liberal democracy to be a "problem" for its continued upward wealth redistribution. Public health requirements for tobacco advertising are a "problem" for multinational cigarette companies so they sue the government of Australia. Privacy laws are a "problem" for Google so they harvest your data in other ways using metadata and network analysis. Personal property is a "problem" for software and entertainment companies so now they "rent" software and multimedia to you for consumption - you don't own it and can't modify or edit it.
Do not rest on the naturalisation of human rights and watch passively as neoliberal capitalism slowly obliterates them in the name of profits. Illiberal regimes like the DPRK should be called out on their lack of human rights as well, but the struggle begins at home.
Malthias ,well said. I agree with where you’re coming from I would have to be blissfully ignorant to ignore the fact that companies are slowly trying to overpower human rights and nullify them. And the fact that certain groups of people are actively pushing for more government control just because of certain things they don’t like or the they just want to be catered to at the expense of other groups, is a rather frightening aspect. The fact that these vocal minorities would rather to suppress human rights in exchange for a bigger government control leads to a “slippery slope” if you would. The fact is that if people want to continue to enjoy they’re un-infringed human rights they need to actively fight for them and not roll over just because it’s “more convenient”.
@@MonMalthias thanks for the bible mate
Lol
They're acting like this will be the first woman in power ever, somehow. Meanwhile England's first female ruler was in like the 1550's.
There have been female leaders since the dawn of time. But go figure. They tend to die in hand to hand combat.
GERMANY HAS HAD A FEMALE LEADER MY WHOLE LIFE
Yeah, some people were either asleep during history classes or were never taught history. There's been more than a few female heads of state throughout history, but sure Kim's baby sister or Clinton would have been the very first! Just like Black Panther was the first black superhero...
I remember hearing about a female leader some 5,000 years ago. But I guess feminists take time to get updated...
Meanwhile Nefertiti probably also was absolute monarch of Egypt for a while, in XIV century... B.C.
These tweets reek of
“Bomb me mommy I’ve been a bad capitalist swine”
Theres a couple that basically say that exact thing
LOL!
I honestly cannot with y'all
@@cannedcoochie6828 is anyone else thinking of Soviet Russia after reading this
MAJJJJIMMMAAAA!!!
"shoutout to North Korea for beating the US at feminism"
Germany with a femal leader for more than a decade: Am i a joke to you?
Merkel fked up the entire Europe by mass-importing middle eastern "workforce" who didn't want to work and they started pushing them to other European countries when there were too many for them to handle. She also is the reason Germany now has energy crisis as she decided to close down their modern and expensive nuclear power plants. She is not a great example of "Good female leader." Lmao
Great Britain: We've had many great Matriarchs.
@@Berdersner good point britain is worse than nazis
North Korea who sells girls to china
is miss Angela Merkel Sometimes
"Homeless people shouting into the abyss"
Sounds like College Students looking at their debt."
"mentally ill homeless people"
Now its definitely College kids
@AxxL, Just, like, what. I-
What
Gulag
**Laugh in swiss**
US needs to get their shit done.
if one shouts into the abyss the abyss will shout back
Man starves and murders millions: he’s a terrible tyrannical evil dictator
Woman starves and murders millions: YAASSSSS QUEEN
I wouldn't doubt that they are under the delusion that she would be more compassionate to the people of North Korea just because she is a woman. Or that somehow if a woman is evil and tyrranical that it means she's a bad-ass.
Because retards never read a history book, or have any idea about Elizabeth Bathroy, becuase they don't teach European history in U.S Drools.....
Lmao
Christopher Stoltz 😂
*Queens Victoria and Isabella joins the chat*
therapist: middle part june isn’t real, she can’t hurt you
middle part june: 12:06
omg i clicked and nothing could have prepared me for this, i screamed
Omg it is the most cursed image of Shoe i ever seen worse than trany mouth picture
LMFAO! 😂
No! Not the right eyebrow! I can see it! Why can I see it!
Western Chiri Kitsu (from Sayonara Zetsubou Sensei)
>Having a woman leader is progressive
Margret Thatcher
Theresa May
Liz Truss ^^! No, wait...
@@VestinVestin In a weird way, that was progressive. Nobody seemed bothered she was a woman relative to her disastrous economic policies, and her ignominious departure wasn't seen as any kind of proof that women are inherently unsuited to leadership.
kinda funny how all female British Prime Ministers have been conservative lmao
"North Korea is about to elect a woman leader before we do."
"elect"
"ELECT"
Why haven't you pressed that button yet?
Lmfao
@@ConarCZ like german chanceler.
@@ConarCZ Not even that. She's just the only other person next in line to rule since Kim Jong Un's son is too young. She wasn't chosen by anybody, not even the party.
Supreme assembly elects those positions, contrary to western belief.
my comments disappear within 2 seconds, i am sure WE ARE in No rth K orea. US = Nrth K orrhhea
“Female North Korean leader causes mass famine with strict policies”
*YAS QUEEN*
slay (literally) 😍😍😍
💀(litterally)
one of the tweets "North Korea just ELECTED their first women leader"
Me: falls off chair laughing
" E L E C T E D ? ! "
I'm imagining Lelouch's line "We will now begin the democratic process" to the UN with a bunch of Knightmare Frames in the room
And having most of the world brainwashed.
Technically, they have elections.
eLeCtEd bitch I-
I find it highly problematic that we’re calling this strong, beautiful, ruthless woman a “dictator”. This is my official petition to change it to “Pusstator”.
She's not a dictator. She's a dictator's relative.
get out please
This is me signing this petition.
This shit got me, ngl. lol
C*ntator
The fact that people are simping for a dictator is just shocking
Does anything really surprise anymore?
I mean... if she looked anything like her brother, there definitely wouldn't be simps.
Hey! We are doing it just in case, you know?
If she looked like Kathy Griffin the number of simps would be in the negative
Lack of education and first world mentality. Lets get them to live in these countries and then we will see.
Ah yes, Margaret Thatcher was why Britain became a more progressive country.
ngl I love margaret thatcher just so I can put her in people like this' faces
Milk snatcher
Clear proof that being female is in fact the only qualification needed to be a great, loved leader.
Can you elaborate for us Americunts who were failed by the public education system?
@@MrJimmybanana Margeret Thatcher was the prime minister of the UK from 1979-1990 and the leader of the conservative party from 1975-1990
"North Korea is about to elect a woman leader before we do"
umm.. who's gonna tell him?
This is an seriously underrated post.
Wait what does this mean xD
Elect?... shows how ignorant people can be. North Korea has never held an election in its entire existence.
Last time I heard that, it was a tfs joke about electing a king.
Again, they made a joke...
Nate Shupp They actually do hold elections, although there's only the dictator on the ballot and voting otherwise is punished by death
The fact that Shoe0nHead/June is a based liberal makes pretty much every politically-aligned person's head spin. The Conservatives are like "How can you be a liberal?" and the Liberals are like, "How can you be based?"
@ashy Exactly.
That’s why we love her
And also why her voice & perspective is so damn uniquely important
@@brian.westersauce I couldn't agree more.
“Progressive”
*they’re not allowed to wear blue jeans.*
Lydia M. *they have limited hairstyles*
White shirt , walked into the room
The Minnie mouse clubhouse and none of which can be similar to un’s
Doot Lord of the tuba Dang, imagine all the STDs
I think the greatly missed Mr David Bowie would have a few words about that.
It’s funny how almost everyone thinks that’s putting a woman in charge is pure progression..
Funny how people still think it's better to look for physical attributes instead of actual skill, competence and experience.
It's not that hard, people.
I swear, my actual retarded brother learns faster.
It is progression. The debate is whether it's progression towards the better and that can only be judged on an individual basis.
@@RiuukiCZ Yes, progression towards identity politics is bad. Choose on character/policies not sex, race, etc.
Not everybody lol. Only pop feminists.
we did in norway preaty sure we've halted any progression
"North korea has a female leader before US"
Meanwhile the queen of Britain, the president of Slovakia, Etiopia, Georgia, Singapore, Estonia, Croatia, Lithuania, Trinidad, Marshall islands, Tchaj wan and queen of Denmark: "are we a joke to you?"
Not to mention Norway, Finland, Iceland... Actually, most of Scandinavia... Germany, New Zealand, Australia had a female prime minister already but doesn't currently, Sint Maarten, Taiwan - So many countries have female leaders or have had them, sometimes several of them. And the countries with female leadership (elected female leaders at least, can't speak for hereditary rulers like queens, but in a constitutional monarchy they're largely figureheads anyway) are overwhelmingly the ones doing substantially better socially, economically, and wrt healthcare during this pandemic. Fancy that. The USA is so behind the times and has such ridiculously low standards, but they still think they're world class lmao
People can shit out a dumb twitter comment but can't use the same internet to educate themselves and learn about the world around them
The world is at my fingertips, and can only be 250 characters long
To be fair the English queen isnt exactly a 'leader' she has very little power compared to past monarchs and is kind of more a figure head, but i get chu
Also several former prime ministers of countries worldwide, such as the UK, Canada, STRAYA, Moldova, Sweden (kinda), India, etc etc
Prime minister of Serbia is not just female, but also a lesbian. And her and her partner have a kid.
As a person who lived through war, these people have NEVER heard a missile fall next to them.
“North Korea is the only country with a woman in charge!”
*Laughs in tea and biscuits*
Edit: I love the amount of countries that have a female leader and yet they still pretend that North Korea is special
*joins laughter with beer an sauerkraut*
Bruh our country used to have female president, like it's rare but not as impossible as they think
@@ano1919 germany first😎
max musterman
Omg der echte Max Mustermann, ich bin dein größter fan
@King Croft What do you mean 'ruined Europe'?
I will not let that sink in. I don't know where it's been. Why isn't it following stay-at-home orders?
Check- and fucking -mate
This mans spittin
i know that sink, it killed both my goldfishes when i was five, i havent forgive it since
@@gabricaroasabedoria7867 That sink is a MONSTER.
North Korea is quite progressive actually. There everybody get's to die of hunger togheter no matter your gender
Now this is equality
In America, there are poor people, middle class people, and rich people
In North Korea, everybody but the leaders are poor so everyone is equal
Such a progressive country that beats us out
Now that’s what I call based
If only you really cared about them and asked your "democratic" government to lift the sanctions
gets*
It was true,
Kim was found in a vegetative state
He turned himself into a pickle, funniest shit I’ve ever seen.
ah i see, a man of a culture!!
this made me say "shut the fuck up" out loud, good job
I like how you left way more space than was necessary
seems kinda self aware
female dictator: exists
rule 34 artists: *oh yeah, its all coming together*
got uh a link for uhhhhhhhhhh research? :))))))))))
@@matteoziegler7632 them your chins bro?
@@matteoziegler7632 I'm pretty sure Shadman has already done that but search that name at your own risk
Oh god oh no AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
*SHAD HAS JOINED THE BATTLE *
FFS the sink has been at the door for thirty minutes why isn't anyone letting it in
you deserve a sub
@@randyrichmondiii3415 But what if they are a sub themselves?
@@lobeliaowl2482 Did you assume their gender?
Social distancing. The sink should go to its house and take a shower.
@@lobeliaowl2482 No comprehend
When you're European and know that having a female leader isn't anything new and is confused by all this
as a french boi, i can relate
@@EldritchBoiah fellow European neighbor I see
Merkel isn't all that great, either... I don't care about gender, I care about much needed reforms. Especially after this pandemic.
@@Itri_Vega right that's fair of course
@@Itri_Vega ? That name can't be real. If it is, you should run for president
Guys cmon just let the damn sink in, he’s been waiting outside for hours
It's an outdoor sink. Practically a street drain.
If he wants to get in he should fix that damn door!
Twitter: we've never had a female leader!
Me: What about the thousands of Queen's, Princesses and Lady's that Europe has had? Funnily enough, that's the same category Kim's sister is in..
(And prime ministers, both of which were absolute garbage)
@slothkingn1 that's only half right. At the beginning of each monarch's reign, they sign over the profits from their lands to the government, and the government adds that to their budget. Taxes are also added to this pool of funds. Then, money is reassigned from the government's budget to the maintenance of the Royal Family and their estates. Their contribution to this budget far outweighs the amount they drain from it. Further, to your first point, this doesn't even count the amount contributed by profits from tourism to Royal estates.
Canada has even had a female prime minister
@@KaisTestKitchen1 and the kinda head of state, the queen, is a woman
In Argentina we had a female president... she took all the money of the country and the people still love her :')
" Zero simp policy "
Me: scrolling to find the simp comments
@@slewone4905 new conspiracy June deletes her comments and pushes her bunny at the end of each video to make us all think everything is ok
@@lylguppy796 ya know, you might be onto something there.
@Crunchy Sauce should of watched the video sooner lol
@Crunchy Sauce you stole my comment premise of having an idea for a comment stolen
I get the feeling she is okay with skimping as long as it's for her.
I love how everyone has their “person on twitter being bold and opinionated” voice.
Especially when there's virtually no repercussion for what they say, yet they act like they're being brave. It causes second hand embarrassment for me.
I dare not ever look into the comments on Twitter. My brain can’t take it. But I do love how shoe perfectly puts their text into the voice I imagine all twitter users have when they’re “owning” people. Did I say that right? Do the kids still say “owning”?
England has had 3 female prime ministers, the first one we don't talk about, the second one wasn't too bad, the third one we also don't talk about
I blame an invisible genie for the last one. I'm not even from the UK, but I vividly remember wishing for her to be PM and seemingly to everyone's surprise, including her own, she became one about 2 months later xD.
@@VestinVestin yeah, and like a month later, if that, she ruined our economy and then just dipped
You also had queens with power in the 16th century
England??? That was a joke right?
@alst4817 I dunno, maybe. I'm not too sure
"I don't care if I die in nuclear hell fire, as long as it's a woman doing it to me". - Feminist 300 IQ galaxy brains hard at work.
I love a nuclear winter just as much as the next guy but you know whatd make it so much better? If it was done by a strong female dictator.
This is why it's important to show that these opinions isn't held by the majority of feminist because people like this idiot think they are
@bokudensuduharagmail
Did you know that most of those tweets barely had over 10 likes... Thats some over whelming support right there!
While Trump talks about putting chlorine in your blood system to get rid of the "Chinese bio weapon" and gets thousands of likes, am I the only one that sees how the extreme left holds no political power yet the extreme right does?
@bscrazy007
Reddit is full of sexist and racist gamers does that mean all gamers are that?
Also how can one prove that? I looked for a survey for the amount of radical feminist that is in feminism but couldn't find anything and that's really the only way I think I could prove something like that
" North Korea get a female head of state, then its gonna be more progressive than the US." My first thought was " was obama black or am I tripping"
Obama's half white so it's only 50% progressive. Now if Michelle was trans we would have been set.
I think he was an alien
CRAZED ROBOT lmmmmaafoooo
@@LucasCAPS 300iq
@carlos Rivas It's called sarcasm, a joke.
"Radfems. They would see this world burn if a woman could lord over the ashes."
they make the rest of us look bad
9:05 i love how he actually wrote: "elect" as if the north corean people are free to elect anything😂
free to do anything you mean
@@Ivannbeats They are actually free to do anything. Only problem is that most of those things end with their execution.
@@PythonPlusPlus lmao
Of course they’re free to elect anyone they like, except nobody other than Kim put their name on the ballot.
@@gamer7916 but also the state executes you, should you try and vote for anything or anyone else... or not vote at all. that sounds more like North Korea, a place where people literally get murdered for not expressing enough anguish at a dictator dying
I hate how women instead of men in charge = progressive
Equality according to feminists
elected man=misogyny
tyrant woman=feminism/progressive
The twitter bots are the ones saying it. You saw the vid.
The thing they never tell you about progress is that you aren't necessarily progressing towards anything good.
It's called tokenism
This is how neoliberalism co-opts actual grassroots leftist movements with good intentions and appropriates them for the acquiescence of power. It reinforces the hierarchy and incentivizes more divisiveness. Actual feminists are anarchists and don't believe in hierarchy at all, let alone female supremacy, unlike fourth-wave liberal feminists (aka feminazis).
I didn't even know he had a sister until this whole thing started.
I didn't know he had a sister until watching the video
Same
Frankly I heard that Kim yo Jong was worse than her brother.
Sooo if she did take power we'd be nuked in a couple of months.
It prompted me to look up how many siblings he has. His oldest brother was assassinated for wanting reform and going to Japan. He apparently wanted to see Disneyland and disgraced his family in the process.
@@horizontaltwo0841 That's just monstrous.
i like how shoe from the future looks like she's been to the apocalypse and back
Amoiremnia we need to learn the secrets before more bad shit happens
She is...she is
justanothergamer 101 or she like looks at these people being dumb and forcing there opinions and wrong beliefs on others but not all females are like this
I laughed harder than I should've on that "let that sink in" joke
same
"We could have had warren"
Bruh her home state didn't even want her lmao
The amount of sinks these people are letting in is insane.
I'm drowning in a sea of ceramic! HELP
Let that sink in!
more sinks that a bathroom manufactory
@@alpeshabhijitchowdhury6895 trump predicted the future!
I'm just gonna let that one sink in
Them saying let that sink in is either straight NPC dialogue or legit bots.
Skyrim style scripting
Reminds me of a couple of years ago on Reddit. There was a thread about Kim Jong Un calling Trump a "dotard". Took me about five minutes to scroll to the bottom of the comments section. It was just a wall of "WELL, HE'S NOT WRONG..." I lost count in the 70's and it kept going. Like, at least 70+ people thought they were the very first person to think of that... hilarious(?) comment.
@@ManuelKoegler one hell of a glitch this world must be. Bethesda, the seed is corrupted, the ai is giving me cancer, i want my money back
Nah. "Let that sink in" is a pretty standard phrase.
Simping that'll make k pop stans go "WOAH BUDDY RELAX!"
"She looks so strong!"...no, Yo Jong looks stunted and malnourished.
"North Korea is so progressive! They have a woman as the head of state!"
*Several European nations are typing...*
The entire continent of South America is destroying its computer.
*New Kingdom of Egypt is banging its head against the keyboard*
Georgia is typing...
Americans seem to forget that Europe exists a lot of the time
@@Xiphactinus I mean... Dilma was awful. She thought that 13-4=7... This is the quality of the brazilian presidents
Feminists:
Men killing women: NO
Women killing women: Y E S
Doublethink
I really remember reading how feminism started. One of the first books wanted to "replace" the ideology of seeing women and men as opposites, somehow like a Clash. This book was published in France around the XVI century. They wanted to abolish that view and *start* looking over options like... equality.
This is prefeminism, tho. The very first glances about the moral ideology of gender. When they weren´t trying to survive other aspects of life like poverty, job and freaking goverment.
Big thinks
And the women killing men part. Remember, they hate men
“North korea is going to be a symbol of feminism”
Looks at rape/sexual misconduct rate and laughs
I once had a leftie history teacher that adored Margaret Thatcher despite critisizing Reagan often, solely because she was a woman.
Was she actually from Britain?
I pretended to be anti reagan in my English essay on the handmaids tail
fun fact from an ideological standpoint Margaret Thatcher is closer to Hitler than Hitler was to Stalin.
Pretty sure most "lefties" would share the IRA's opinion of Margaret Thatcher
@@jupiterjaeden9163 * Go on Home British Soldiers intensifies*
i wouldn’t be surprised if there was a cosmo article titled:
is looting female characters in skyrim sexism?
If you find a dead woman in skyrim wearing dadric armor tough luck chucklenuts
Depends on which mods you have installed, honestly.
Sounds like something buzzfeed would've made
i haven't increased my stealth for nothing bro
Dude, don’t jinx it, we’re already too close to that happening
These people are just extremely distant from reality. A scary Korean dictator woman is the type of character we would all love in a movie, except this is real world with real people suffering from dictatorship.
damnit, i read "Karen dictator" at first.
*The kind of character edgy people who idealize villains would like
@@thomasf.9717 Oh God no
@Alfie Martin Nope. It has never killed anyone and they have repeatedly said they would never use their nuke except in retaliation of an attack on their sovereignty. I can't stand the insanity, the smugness of liberals who recognize that the USA is a warmonger that strongarms any nation that tries to forge an independent path but are still somehow afraid of a tiny country that just wants the USA to leave them alone.
Oh man, I laughed so hard throughout this whole video 😂😂. The button, the women’s touch, the LET THAT SINK IN with the door opening and the floating sink picture👌👌, sooo good! Made my day.
Thanks June, I really needed that ☀️☀️!!
Man these people are going to be mind blown when they hear about Queen Elizabeth II
Especially because she’s the sequel
I want a reboot
You ever heard of the movie "The Madness of King George"?
True story: it was originally a play called The Madness of George III. When it was sold for the movies, the studio execs retitled it because the thought people would see the title and wonder "when were the first two in the series?"
don't forget Queen Victoria!
and queen victoria
and the New Zealand prime minister... as well as many other female leaders in the world...
KIm Yo-Jung puts the cute in “execute everyone in the village”
John Aaron
She's an exe-cutie.
I came to the comments for the simp lol
This is hilarious
I love you shoe please make more videos!!!!!!
Learn to write Korea names, goddamnit
I won't lie, I was laughing hard at the Kim Yo Jong-sama memes.
Same. You can always count on the weebdom to make animemes out of anything and everything. And the damn quality is so high too... Like somebody spent hours and hours on drawing dictator-chan with bread in her mouth.
Kim yo youg look like a slight hot Asian then add the forehead of valdomort I can't believe people want that
Be a great amine tho if they made one base on Kim Yo Jong
-SAMA
Classic
Uwaaaaa! I'm late for my first day of public executions!!!
“Let that sink in”
Let that sink in
Lmao “ELECT a woman leader before the US”. So braindead. Literally the NPC meme
@@dboot8886 do you get to the cloud district very often?
Xander Bayer what am i saying, of course you dont
Do you get to the cloud district very often?
This highlights just how little some of these people understand about world politics, let alone local ones.
I saw that, I was like "oh . . .she's not commenting on that :( "
“nOrTh KoReA iS mOrE pRoGrEsSivE tHaN tHe US”
The millions of North Koreans who have almost no freedom and are literally starving to death: Are we a joke to you?
Soviet Union: collapses.
Korean republic: pls help everything is gone, the harvests where fuck, we are dying.
The west: lol commies no food
I hate you from the depth of my heart.
Rootless Cosmopolitan it doesn’t “praise itself”, it was forced into such a state by the situation it found itself in. You know close to nothing about a country and yet still choose to assume that it deserves the continued hostility of the worlds greatest power. Bravo, fucking bravo.
@Rootless Cosmopolitan Learn your history instead of repeating US propaganda. Why is the korean republic the way it is? Some demonic commie overlord turned them all into robots? Did they pursuit a doctrine of self-reliance because they want to feel badass and strong?
You know nothing!
@@Klikoderat sure man
Yes, yes you are
They act like there were never queens and women ruling throughout history
These idiots have never read anything longer than a text in their lives.
Bold to assume they know a thing about history.
@@toddtaylor316 Their proudest moment is when they finish an article marked as "longread".
@Hayden TCEM Americans literally had Elizabeth I ruling over them 500 years ago.
Alex yeah man they're ignorant
You can't spell cute without "starve the whole village to death" am I right?
Copied the top joke and it was still shit 👌
Twitter be out here like "female Hitler? Can't wait!"
Actually, I would totally support that idea. Europe really need a saviour.
Fuck yeah. 420.
Alright sure the dictator she is pretty hot, but female Hitler, oh god i'm so hard now.
@@gregorgerzson1767 jesus Christ, tf
@GamerGiraffic Dude, you should learn some history ffs.. Germany only wanted Danzing: Danzing or war? (They wanted to go against the Soviet Union) Poland said fck off, war. 3 days later France and UK declared war to Germany and started a big, european war. So, the allince bring Europe to war. They even lied to Poland, promised help just to refuse Germany, and then did nothing but let the polish bleeding on the front. They wanted war really badly.
Imagine thinking Trump is more authoritarian than an actual dictatorship.
PJ9 and they want her to “own” Trump? Lmfao what kind of world are they living in? Like why would you want a dictator to own Trump.
Then why are yall complaing he wont keep the country locked down?
The fact that they denounce Trump for being a dictator disproves their claim in real time.
So when I see a video like this my first question is "what message is this video sending? What opinions will be reinforced or challenged?" Shoe should tread this water carefully. This isnt 2016. We're past strawmanning feminists by looking at sketchy Twitter posts. Let's evolve the debate.
@Bad Boys Boogie And, again, the fact that you're even able to make that comment disproves you in real time.
*"Let that sink in"* is like hearing an NPC in a game repeat the same line for the 100th time.
*STOP! You've violated the law*
I think that enemy got the point!
C+ amirite!?
You have committed crimes against Skyrim and her people, what say you in your defense
@@leonardojimenez6079 I'm sorry, but I had to steal that glass greatsword, and if they didn't give it to me, I would have to convince them.
The Umbridge example was actually pretty good. Everyone hates Umbridge and it would be a nightmare if she were in charge. I think that comment was actually on the anti dictator side
She puts the cute in "exeCUTE the protesters"
Here is a cookie, now run with it.
The fact that the quotation marks could go “she puts the cute in exeCUTE”- the protesters or “exeCUTE the protesters
north korea: gets female dictator
rule 34 artists: oh yeah, it's all coming together
>Shadman
;)
@Brent Thomson it does, I've seen it
*Cooming*
Twitter: "North Korea is about to *elect* a female leader"
North Korean Leadership: "Haha! Funny word, what does it mean?"
Also north Korean leadership after finding out: ohhhhhh _gun shots_
North Korean leadership: wow they disappeared!
Elect
I only can imagine their face when they realize North-Korei is a necrocracy, and officially the country's leader is still the founder, Kim Ir Sen.
"That means his sister is the new leader of north korea"
Me: "she kinda looks like a yakuza, that's fuckin badass-"
Simps: "femdom mommy"
"There will be no simping on this channel"
_...Implying that we stop simping for Bernie._
I simp for the bunny. He can walk onto my lap
It’s very simp of you but my simping out simps, your simping.
@@creetan9997 You missed a SIMPleton joke there
The most stupid part is that these feminist act like there had never been a female head of state. Completly ignoring the 22 women that are head of state right now. But i guess the US never had a female head of state and the US is all that's important so germany, Bangladesh, Norway, Namibia, Nepal, Myanmar, Taiwan, Estonia, Serbia, Singapore, New Zealand, Iceland, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Ethopia, Georgie, Slovakia, Denmark, Belgium, Bolivia, Finland and Greece don't count.
It always hits me, as the current state of "progressivism" in US - when it will happen (woman leader), it's gonna be huge, festivals, parades and "we lead the free world", "first as usual", "Next step for the human kind", while literally half of the world will be - "Wat?". Half of Europe get women in charge on daily basics, and nobody even notices.
Wait Greece when?
@@thegoldenduck3765 Greece elected Katerina Sakellaropoulou as president on the 22.01.2020.
By the way, the first female president in greece.
@@KingQwertzlbrmpf But she is not the head of the country Mitsotakis is, right?
@@thegoldenduck3765 How did you get that idea? Mitsotakis is merely the party head of the nea dimokratia party. Sakellaropoulou is the president of the country.
I’m from a Southeastern European country where we don’t only have a female prime minister, but a lesbian female prime minister. It should be paradise according to these liberals? No. Our country has been turning to sh*t the past few years, it’s becoming less democratic as we speak. There have been massive protests the past few days against her, the president and the other people in their party because we don’t wanna see our country deteriorate any further, but I don’t even know if it can go more south than this. Being under dictatorship isn’t fun even if there are women in charge. The only measure for somebody to be in charge should be merit, country’s governments shouldn’t be viewed in the same way as some random company that should fill it’s diversity quotas.
Diversity quotas are stupid anyway. Fighting emergent gender disbalance with instituted sexism is the most backwards way to go about it.
@slothkingn1 Serbia I think, Ana Brnabic
@slothkingn1 Most democratic countries have both, you just don't hear much about one or the other depending on the government type, e.g. president of Germany or prime minister of France.
@slothkingn1 Actually, as Jadeed pointed out, there are plenty of countries, even well known ones, who have both. It is just that only one of those offices holds actual power, depending on the system. France has a presidential system, so you hardly ever hear about the French Prime Minister since he does not matter. Germany has a parliamentary system with the Chancellor as the equivalent of a Prime Minister, so you hardly ever hear about the German President (who holds mostly ceremonial powers). Russia, presidential system, so again, Prime Minister of Russia is hardly ever mentioned (except when Putin took over that office so he could still be in position of power until he was done with changing the constitution to allow himself yet another presidential term later). My country (Croatia, right next to Serbia, and yes, the original post was about Serbia) has parliamentary system, so the Prime Minister is the one in charge, while the President holds mostly ceremonial powers.
Here's the interesting part of the internet being global: People not from your country are going to look at your internal politics as nothing but fun facts. Your openly gay PM is very cool to Reddit because they don't have to actually give a shit about her policies. She might be a dictator to you, but to the rest of the world she's a "step in the right direction for the LGBT" despite her not being elected, her using her position to protect her millionaire brother, her being an underling to a fascist president. History will remember her for being openly gay and a prime minister which is exactly what your president banks on. It's amazing how useful these idiots are.
I read the book Nothing to Envy: Everyday lives in North Korea. The vast majority of women there are starving, scrounging for ways to make money and live in fear of the police. There’s no feminism because everyone is treated like a slave. Unless you get really good test scores and get to go to Pyongyang
i love how these ppl automatically assume this woman will be a competent leader just because she's a woman.
They don't and it doesn't matter. Having a woman in power is all that matters.
Whatever goes wrong you simply blame on men.
I don't think they even care about her being competent or not. They just go "any woman > any man"
@Tetrimas From my personal experience, I have preferred having female bosses than male bosses. In general, I think women are better at managing people, while men are better at managing projects. This is all averages, obviously.
It's ridiculous. Sex doesn't make someone automatically better or worse, that's the whole point of egalitarianism that should be a focus of some feminists.
@Tetrimas dude, no.
Twitter: "OMG FEMALE DICTATORS HOW PROVRESSIVE!!!"
Catharine The Great: ”Am I a joke to you? Wait, don't answer that... Executions for all of you!! "
Precisely. Female dictators usually don't have pity for other women, especially feminists.
@@alrune8 not to mention there's a story in history of a woman who was made a leader due to the surrounding kingdoms killing her husband... Her response was to basically genocide the surrounding kingdoms, showing absolutely no mercy to civilians, women, children, etc... Forget the name but she burned a few major cities to the ground.
@@alrune8 Hilary Clinton proved this back when she was a lawyer by defending a man who raped a teenage girl and getting him off free of charge. She still plays the feminist card because she thought that would get her more votes.
@@EmmersonSprocket Hillary is a terrible person but wasn't she a public defender in that case? Aka required to take the case
@@normajeanmonroe2627 Or so she said.
Either way, she still laughed about getting the perpetrator off during a radio interview.
When that person said “elected” in relation to a dictator I died a little inside and will gladly take the nuke.
Well actually they vote for their dictator but they have only one vote option and if they dont vote it theyll get executed
@@sylvian777 sounds like a flawless system!
@@vinnyfromvenus8188 It is for the dictator :/
First woman leader in the world:
Australia, Germany, Britain and South Korea: are we a joke to you?
it’s almost as if they don’t GAF about the reality of the situation, like AUTHORITARIAN RULE, so long as a woman is in charge. because then, they’re at least not sexist right?
The sad truth is that they are ignoramuses who probably don't know the first thing about what goes on in North Korea. The first they likely heard of it was Trump's dealing with them, and since Orange Man Bad, North Korea must be an okay place.
z8ph0d facts dude
And to be fair, it doesn't go like this: Kim Jong Un dies, and Kim Yo Jong just becomes the next Supreme Leader. Yes, in theory it would be her spot, but in reality the generals wouldn't let that happen and would basically have a power struggle between themselves, most likely assassinate Yo Jong and seize power for themselves. And the propaganda machine would feed their lies on what happened, to the public and everyone would be... nay, act happy. Because if you'd protest, well... :D
LordBhorak exactly. no one wins under totalitarian rule.
And then one day, for no reason at all, people voted Hitler in to power
I love how some of those tweets literally said: "north korea might *elect* a woman". Elect. As in, democratic process of choosing someone to lead them. My god how sheltered are these people?
You clearly don't know North Korea on the DPRK they in fact hold elections granted there's only one person on the ballet and no one else has tried or at least the north Korean government has never told us if anyone has ever tried to run but technically elections no matter how unfair.
@Eduardo Fernandes You should re-read my comment I said it was unfair I can understand misreading a comment so no criticism here.
They're wrong - Let Dat Sin King is Kim's half-brother, and he's only second in line to the throne.
Let's be real, whoever the military backs will be leader.
LOL - Underrated comment
@@MaskinJunior wait since when did kim jong un not look like he knew what he was doing...? i mean i guess he seems a bit chubby but that doesn't mean he's incompetent as a *ruthless dictator* lmao
Yu tu funny, you go jail now!
@@MaskinJunior Let's just say he is not as competent as his father in being a dictator. Kim Jong Il wasn't the butt of THAT many jokes.
People who focus on peoples race gender etc above all else are kinda dumb, here in the UK we have had two female prime ministers and they have both been terrible. I'm not saying that a female prime minister can't be good, gender is just not an important factor to consider in a prime minister, you should vote based on policies and what they stand for.
You speak facts. Honestly, who cares how you look like as long as you do a good job?
9:07 "North Korea is about to ELECT a woman leader before we do. Let that sink in." I dont think that person knows how dictatorships work.
I can explain.
That is a wahmen and not Trump therefore she cannot possibly be a dictator.
This PSA brought to you by the council of infuriating fucksticks who had their brains switched with lemons at birth.
She'll get elected. And by elected I mean she'll be the only person who is on the ballot and if you don't vote for her you and your family will be sent to a labor camp.
My country already had a president woman before the US...😆😆😆
@@ladycommentor2536 yeah, andd it's funny, because a lot of 2nd and 3rd world countries have already had a female leader and they are still 2nd and 3rd world countries.
@@nikolaynicolasnikolayevich doesn't change... Male or female as long as they don't really do what is needed to be done to become a better country nothing will change...
I don't care much if what gender the president would be... As long as he or she had to do his or her job well...
That all that matters...
"Maybe a little"
Its like everyone is forgetting about the Queen, she is literally one of the most powerful people in the world
Which queen? there is a lot of queens in the world, no one is ''The'' queen on the internet :/
@@logirogi1468 Speak for yourself Logi, Elizabeth II best Waifu.
I simp for Queen Elizabeth
A lot of these femanists don't seem to know that the world has had many women rulers over the thousands of years, Europe in particular has been flush with them, but they don't like that being pointed out because then it becomes all about their merit as leaders and not pAtRiArCy.
On paper*
She's probably the single most powerful person in the world on paper but actually using the power is another matter.
"North korea is about to 'elect' a female leader before the US"
what bro talkin about "elect" there is no choice 💀
“Elect” I don’t think that word means what you think it means.
naw man the "democratic" "republic" of North Korea definately holds elections with competing parties every 4 years.
The Kims are just literally gods thats why they keep getting elected.
(yes this is sarcasm)
@@Nerobyrne obey the party
@@Nerobyrne It IS quite hard to run a successful political campaign against literal gods.... heavily armed gods
erect
ONI Section Zero actually there is an election every 4/5 years but the Kims are actually the only party that is allowed to candidate to the election. And every citizen is forced to vote for them, so yeah not democratic but there IS an election.
How the hell do they even know she is a "strong" leader? Y'all didn't know who she was a few days ago.
Not knowing her a few days ago isn't even the worst thing as one can learn quite a lot of things about a person even within the span of a few days. Worst i'd say is them making shit up. I mean, nothing is known about the woman to begin with.
Now now, don't interfere with their fantasies.
She has been the leader of the Propaganda and Agitation Department for a while now. She is an experienced leader who is definitely not going to be any less strict than the current dictator.
@@lred1383 That was not my point. My point is that most of these "liberal" twitter accounts probably havent done any reasearch on her to know if she is a strong leader or not and just jumped on the "yaas queen" wagon (which is fucked up cause she is still a dictator)
"I can't wait for Trump to deal with a strong female leader in North Korea."
I'm preeeetty sure he's going to do the same thing he did the first time. Remind her that his big red button is bigger, actually works, and would use it.
"hey Mister President, wanna play with my big red Button?"
I loved that line.
And then talk about how great she is despite their constantly threatening to Nuke each others countries. And agree to some favors in exchange for them agreeing to terms that they agreed to 30 years ago but can't be trusted to follow, and then act like he stopped World War 3 despite him trying to get into a dick measuring contest is what got people worried about it to begin with, and the previous president would have done the same thing if the party praising Trump now had consistent opinions on how to deal with North Korea.
Ah I was waiting for that sink pun.
3:47 "Can you imagine a world without the internet?"
Anyone born before 1990: We lived it.
Ah, the days of Outside. Great game. Sometimes light on content, but those graphics...
@@rcslyman8929 real time ray tracing was cool but too many balance issues to really enjoy past the tutorial levels
this open world is too huge
@@rcslyman8929 nice comments haha
We need to build a warehouse for all of those sinks that are not being let in
👌👍 I agree
*STRONGLY*
LET THAT SINK IN
@@danielgaming6957 here's a porcelean one.
Also, these feminists need to get a grip. There have been female elected leaders of countries before (ie. Thatcher, Merkle). And there have been plenty of non elected also(Queens). Get over it we lost this race long ago.
They need to rewrite history to their liking.
I mean to be fair I think they're arguing that it's sad that a backwards country like NK is winning that race.
...not to say that it isn't hilarious that they can't seem to understand the reasoning as to why that is.
History of the world outside of USA doesn't exist. World only begun 200 years ago
@@Zakatak-mf4iq There've been quite a few elected female leaders in non-Western countries (Philipines, Argentina, Liberia etc.) in the past 2 decades, so their sadness about the 'progressiveness' of "backwards" countires is far too late.
Very sorry, but *Merkel
These people know that queens have always been a thing, right? Born female queens 👑
The clapping emojis are all too real
*Let that sink in*
Na
Is there even a god? If so why does he do this am I in the 9th chamber of hell
I think when they keep saying "Feminism!" They must be misspelling "Nepotism!"
Despotism*
It's basically a monarchy without being a monarchy. Nepotism is different.
@@pitmezzari2873 okay, but theyre saying its because of feminism that she would become leader of north korea. But its because shes blood related, the sister of a dictator. NK being a dictatorship itself is despotism. Someone being put in a high position of power because they're your family is still nepotism.
@@jake.g1 yeah, I get it, but nepotism is only possible in case of an otherwise "democratic" system. Like with Pope elections in the past, where cardinals would vote for their relatives.
the fact that kimmy boy faked his own death to expose traitors baffles me
Na he just returned from the gulag
Big brain time
Macchiavelli's level of deception!
The fact that the plan succeeded baffles me more
@Marc Ruffalo almost like something bigger than corona happening were learning of more traitors every few days kinda crazy like this flynn case and now obama oh boy its getting spicy
9:06 I love how that guy said "elect"
“Orange man bad. Waman dictator good”
I may not like the guy, but at least there was CHOICE involved! They’re getting whoever they get, no ifs, ands, or buts! I wish these people understood that
So when I see a video like this my first question is "what message is this video sending? What opinions will be reinforced or challenged?" Shoe should tread this water carefully. This isnt 2016. We're past strawmanning feminists by looking at sketchy Twitter posts. Let's evolve the debate.
Carrot man bad
@@joelsytairo6338 there is a subset of feminists that hate men so much that they would welcome a dictatorship as long as the dictator was a woman, because they believe that women are just so much better than men that a woman dictator would just make everything better.
The rest of the feminists call these people liberal feminists, white feminists, or TERFs.
@@Nerobyrne Of course. The question I pose is 1. Is this subset of feminists statistically significant enough to be represented of feminism as a whole? 2. Are satirical Twitter comments an accurate representation of their arguments? and 3. Are their voices worthy of being platformed on this channel or does it serve to strawman feminism to the causal viewer, leaving her opposed to something she does not fully understand?