Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains The Three Body Problem

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 авг 2024
  • * ROAD TO 900,000 SUBSCRIPTIONS **
    to Donate using Paypal!: www.paypal.com...
    Patreon - / mrlboyd
    FOLLOW ME: / mrlboyd
    PUBLIC DISCORD: / discord
    MUSIC REACTIONS : / @mrlboydmusic
    MOVIE AND TV REACTIONS: MOVIE AND TV REACTIONS: / @mrlboydmoviereviews
    CLICK THE BELL! 🔔
    CONTACT ME
    ➡️ / mrlboyd
    ➡️ / mrlboyd
    ➡️ / malagaphotography
    ➡️ Snapchat: MrLboyd

Комментарии • 88

  • @kiin..
    @kiin.. 2 месяца назад +8

    The tv show they are talking about is called "The 3 Body Problem"

  • @hulkamaanio
    @hulkamaanio 2 месяца назад +4

    We have always said one or another way that "right now we know basically everything there is to know" and then insane things are found :D over and over again

  • @krinord
    @krinord Месяц назад

    Its not about how large something is, its about how MASSive something is. A neutron star forexample is about 13 miles in diameter, but it has more mass than Jupiter and our sun, about 1.5 times more massive than our sun. This also goes for black holes, white dwarfs, neutron stars and so on, they are incredibly like dense. Like you can have 2 cubes, 1 made of steel and 1 made of Tungsten, the tungsten cube will be heavier because though being the same size it has more Mass, higher density.
    Also a stars size (diameter) can change over time depending on where it is in its life-cycle, out own star will become way larger as it moves close to its end, but that does not mean it will be more massive or "heavier" if you'd like.

  • @hellbillyjr
    @hellbillyjr 2 месяца назад +2

    NDT is my birthday brother! The podcast you're reacting to typically has some really good info and hes a great teacher when it comes to simplifying complex issues

  • @EMEILO4
    @EMEILO4 2 месяца назад +1

    You should react to Neil deGrasse Tyson's response to terrence howard. ITS INSANE

  • @tnightwolf
    @tnightwolf 2 месяца назад

    The 3 Body Problem is a book trilogy by the Chinese writter Liu Cixin (The Three Body Problem, Dark Forest and Death's End). It is a wild series of sci-fi books that i love (there's actually a 4th one but it was not written by him). Some people don't like it because of the militirastic and ideological undertone. I'll say that is very worth the read because despite Liu Cixin not being an incredible writter imo and me not agreeing with a big part of the ideological undertone, the scientific concepts that are put forward and the way the entire story is constructed and presented makes it some of the most engaging sci-fi i've read in this past decade. And Netflix made a series based on those 3 or 4 books (haven't watched it yet).

  • @anthonyv6962
    @anthonyv6962 2 месяца назад +1

    Chaos doesn't mean things go crazy and are out of control. The global weather systems are chaotic. They simply mean that minute. Perturbations potentially will cause giant changes down the line. Like the butterfly effect butterfly flaps its wings in the United States, a tornado forms in China. Further, the three body problem is solvable however, it doesn't have a closed form solution. There are umpteen numerical methods to solve the three-body problem. The end body problem etc. How do you think they predict the motion of our solar system? In chaotic systems a one-digit change in in digit . 00000001 hypothetically could mean the difference between a tornado forming in China or tornado for me in Europe. Chaos doesn't mean out of control or crazy

  • @user-xj3ve7wt8k
    @user-xj3ve7wt8k 2 месяца назад

    The three body problem is not the problem if there is a dominant gravitational force of the stars ( suns ). If the gravitational force is similar or identical, then chaos ensues.

  • @jeffstallings8737
    @jeffstallings8737 2 месяца назад +1

    I’m going to side with Newton…it’s a God thing!

    • @updem
      @updem 2 месяца назад

      Newton was lazily bowing to his religious indoctrination for answers, don't be newton.

  • @dragonhawkeclouse2264
    @dragonhawkeclouse2264 2 месяца назад

    I'm still confused about the three body problem
    Are we saying that there CAN be stable orbits....we just don't know how to simulate it?
    Or are we saying simply that, in every case, one object will get flung out?
    If it can't work, then it can't work. If it can work, and we just can't figure out how to make our simulations work it, THEN there is an issue. Is that what is being said?

  • @Canyouhereit
    @Canyouhereit 2 месяца назад +3

    Tyson is an American treasure and i wish he could live forever

    • @lxgxndxry24
      @lxgxndxry24 2 месяца назад

      He is a puppet

    • @davemcelroy618
      @davemcelroy618 2 месяца назад

      ​@@lxgxndxry24who cares lol still more interesting then half you clowns

  • @gatornation1209
    @gatornation1209 2 месяца назад +1

    I might not sleep tonight, i might get tugged

    • @badsabre5917
      @badsabre5917 2 месяца назад

      If you stop tugging you should be able to sleep fine.

  • @showbizz7539
    @showbizz7539 2 месяца назад +1

    Love Niel

  • @GuessWhoAsks
    @GuessWhoAsks 2 месяца назад

    The age and size of the cosmos may be debatable, but the information we have available to interpret is laughable when compared. We only have a few thousand years of recorded history, and less than 500 years since the most basic telescope was used from only one point in space. How confident are you that the information we CLAIM to understand about what is beyond Earth that we have no way to verify is actually true?
    Edit..."our solar system" instead of "Earth" would be more appropriate.

  • @anthonyv6962
    @anthonyv6962 2 месяца назад

    Most people I see are confused as of what chaos is. If you're interested, you should read the story of how Lorenz rediscovered chaos while trying to predict the weather using a computer that's when he coined the term butterfly effect. Chaos doesn't mean the system is out of control or it's random or anything like that. What it means is minute perturbations can result drastically different results.

  • @JRush374
    @JRush374 2 месяца назад

    For more insight into unsolvable problems, look up Bell's inequality

  • @danwhite7862
    @danwhite7862 2 месяца назад +2

    8:56 Has he ever studied and atom?

    • @Austintwo3
      @Austintwo3 2 месяца назад

      what does that have to do with stars? serious question

  • @Juwann22
    @Juwann22 2 месяца назад

    I genuinely don't think we have the knowledge, technology, and time (won't be around long enough) to see the differences in a 3 body problem. It's probably. Not that crazy but the timeline for reading/understanding the data is too unfathomable for human species lifespan

  • @danwhite7862
    @danwhite7862 2 месяца назад +2

    6:46 if that is right then why do we keep gaining time every year???

    • @jam1870utube
      @jam1870utube 2 месяца назад

      NDT explained leap year in another video, but I don't remember exactly what he said. I'm not very good with math and physics, but sometimes I can understand basic concepts of astronomy.

    • @Vyperus69
      @Vyperus69 2 месяца назад +1

      if your referring to leap years then we get the extra day every 4 years because it takes the Earth 365 days and roughly 6 hours to fully orbit the Sun, 1 year = 1 full rotation of the Sun.

  • @woodworkinggunnybear581
    @woodworkinggunnybear581 2 месяца назад +1

    We do have the knowledge. We deny the biblical creation story, and then call things that aren't congruent with the new story "a probllem", "a paradox", etc.
    I counted no less than 20 logical fallacies and fallacious claims in his explaination.
    At least he admits that it is science fiction at he end. Plausible deniability.

  • @MulhollandJack
    @MulhollandJack 2 месяца назад +1

    I strongly agree with chaos theory. It was millions of coincidences that our planet Earth staid healthy away from sun that life can exist on this planet. Think about that, chaos theory means its 0.000000000000000001% coincidence that ure alive and breathing. Ofc its chaos theory, its matter of events in our universe that just IS.

    • @anthonyv6962
      @anthonyv6962 2 месяца назад

      Nothing. You're saying here has anything to do with chaos. You should read up on it.

    • @MulhollandJack
      @MulhollandJack 2 месяца назад

      @@anthonyv6962 Everything is moving like chaos. Time is only thing that remains relevant. U cannot predict these things and keep a straight face, Always chaos even when ur walking by!

  • @McMillanScottish
    @McMillanScottish 2 месяца назад

    Neil deGrasse Tyson has an IMDb page. Actors get those. Be careful whose bullshit you buy.

  • @richardmontano8984
    @richardmontano8984 2 месяца назад

    perterbation theory is a little tug here a little tug here that a cancels out. Masturbation theory is constant tugging until an object is dislodged

  • @gatornation1209
    @gatornation1209 2 месяца назад +1

    Scientists can't handle more than two things at a time?

  • @robbrennan9229
    @robbrennan9229 2 месяца назад

    This is probably going to come across very dumb. I am fascinated by science and the cosmos, but working 70 plus hours a week I don’t get spend a lot of time studying it. Growing up, I seem to remember being told that mathematics was the only “universal language “. If that’s the case, why can’t the problem be solved? Is it possible that there is another “language” beyond our comprehension of math?

  • @justdaniel165
    @justdaniel165 2 месяца назад

    Usually in a binary star system one star Usually eats the other

  • @JosephTraynor
    @JosephTraynor 2 месяца назад

    Why make probability this complicated. Chaos is calculable.

  • @le4864.
    @le4864. 2 месяца назад

    🤯

  • @cr4ftyazme544
    @cr4ftyazme544 2 месяца назад

    So gravity has elasticity ? String theory but elastic

  • @josephspagnola9884
    @josephspagnola9884 2 месяца назад

    I'm such a dumbest snd idk why I would even attempt this 😂😂😂 but I smoked a joint this morning and now I'm basically a brilliant genius for the next hour. Why can't the 3 sun's orbit around the planet evenly spaced and timed

  • @mattwagner9892
    @mattwagner9892 2 месяца назад +1

    Unsolvable chaos but we can predict eclipses and when astroid belts will be in view. If it was really chaotic would we see the same exact stars every night?

    • @anthonyv6962
      @anthonyv6962 2 месяца назад +1

      You don't understand what chaos means and it is solvable. However, it doesn't have a closed form solution. It can be solved with numerical methods.

    • @mattwagner9892
      @mattwagner9892 2 месяца назад +1

      @anthonyv6962 chaos is zero order, right? The 3 body equations may be solvable, but an ever expanding space that introduces more and more bodies to the equation while still showing the same stars every night isn't chaos. All the extra bodies would make the equation unsolvable unless a quantum computer was doing the math.

    • @Vyperus69
      @Vyperus69 2 месяца назад +1

      the stars you see at night are from lightyears away and many of them are already dead, its just that the light from them we are seeing is from so far away that their extinction hasn't been seen yet. Also the star formations our distant ancestors saw in the sky, aren't the exact same ones we see in the sky today.

  • @jaqenhgarMF
    @jaqenhgarMF 2 месяца назад

    Sounds like planetary musical chairs…Polygamists take notes!

  • @MulhollandJack
    @MulhollandJack 2 месяца назад

    Maybe trillion more zeroes on my calculation, but u get the point

  • @mugglescakesniffer3943
    @mugglescakesniffer3943 2 месяца назад

    Would it be like the pattern of juggling?

  • @yvonneconte3040
    @yvonneconte3040 2 месяца назад

    Do we really want to know the outcome or just enjoy the ride.. life is chaotic

  • @kennethslayor8177
    @kennethslayor8177 2 месяца назад

    What then concerning Phobos and Deimos, the two moons of Mars? Somehow it seems there are solvable problems.

    • @mpolster24
      @mpolster24 2 месяца назад

      They would need to be the same size as mars to be what they are discussing

  • @josephfbuck
    @josephfbuck 2 месяца назад

    👍

  • @jam1870utube
    @jam1870utube 2 месяца назад +1

    Thank you, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, for explaining the 3 body problem in a way that my layman brain can understand.

  • @woodworkinggunnybear581
    @woodworkinggunnybear581 2 месяца назад +1

    God fixed it to wòrk perfectly in the first instance. Doesn't require intermittent fixing.

  • @yoskarokuto3553
    @yoskarokuto3553 Месяц назад

    3 LIARS!!! PROBLEM

  • @user-pt5dk5qy8j
    @user-pt5dk5qy8j 2 месяца назад

    Your comments and reactions lower the value of the video. Can’t even continue watching it.

  • @thehubrisoftheunivris2432
    @thehubrisoftheunivris2432 2 месяца назад +6

    Neil is so not credible to me.

    • @armchairwizard8613
      @armchairwizard8613 2 месяца назад +3

      Why are there so many Neil haters? Are they mad for political reasons?

    • @thehubrisoftheunivris2432
      @thehubrisoftheunivris2432 2 месяца назад +3

      @@armchairwizard8613 the first thing that raised my eyebrows was when he was criticizing SpaceX as an impossible endeavor. Then I paid close attention to his attitude and record of being right or wrong and any humility. He fails at all if these variables, consistently. He's just one of the celebrity faces of science to me now.

    • @armchairwizard8613
      @armchairwizard8613 2 месяца назад +5

      @@thehubrisoftheunivris2432 But again, that has no bearing on his actual scientific knowledge or ability as a science educator. I find most people complaining about him online are doing so for similar political reasons.

    • @Nefarious_Bread
      @Nefarious_Bread 2 месяца назад +4

      @@thehubrisoftheunivris2432 How does he fails at these. Explain this please.

    • @lxgxndxry24
      @lxgxndxry24 2 месяца назад

      ​@armchairwizard8613 along with Tyson, he and michio Kaku write books on existing knowledge. They aren't disproving the firmament idea yet they aren't leading scientists which many are claiming we're in a simulation. He doesn't really provide math with our reality; for example frequency. We may not be able to space travel bc of our dimensional limits nor even live on other planets due to resonance frequency. But the idea of space which our bodies have shown we can't sustain why would an astrophysicist imply celestial bodies are real when we have the science to question whether space travel is possible

  • @danwhite7862
    @danwhite7862 2 месяца назад +9

    3 is the start or all collectives, and Tyson is hard to believe since he's wrong about a lot that he knows nothing about but sounds like it. Although he knows the stars as it is what he studied, yet new knowledge is proving what he was taught, may not be correct.

    • @fakelandtommy4471
      @fakelandtommy4471 2 месяца назад +7

      I wish your comment Made any sense at all

    • @davemcelroy618
      @davemcelroy618 2 месяца назад +1

      ​@@fakelandtommy4471😂😂 couldn't agree with you more ...

    • @Grimkeeper17
      @Grimkeeper17 2 месяца назад

      ​@@fakelandtommy4471did you not pass 1st grade?

    • @Sm0kingGun
      @Sm0kingGun 2 месяца назад

      ​@@Grimkeeper17 Yes yes we understand the words, they just don't make any sense in that particular order. But since you obviously know how to decode nonsense, maybe you can translate it for our simple brains?

    • @fakelandtommy4471
      @fakelandtommy4471 2 месяца назад +4

      @@Grimkeeper17a long time ago, in a school system far far away I did pass the first grade, however advanced gibberish was never covered. I can’t make heads or tails of what you are even talking about let alone your point. I hope, for your sake, that English isn’t your first language. I hope for my sake that I never read such poorly constructed sentences ever again.
      See I can make a personal attack too, mine just makes sense because I know how to form legitimate sentences.

  • @MulhollandJack
    @MulhollandJack 2 месяца назад

    The God Delusion By Dawkins, Richard is a good book for really delusional ppl to start with sink in with reality.

  • @MulhollandJack
    @MulhollandJack 2 месяца назад

    Oooh how i love science and history. I guess runs in the family. Sister studies human DNA, so genzzzeers can live longer🤣🤣

  • @lxgxndxry24
    @lxgxndxry24 2 месяца назад

    ​Along with Tyson, he and michio Kaku write books on existing knowledge. They aren't disproving the firmament idea yet they aren't leading scientists which many are claiming we're in a simulation. He doesn't really provide math with our reality; for example frequency. We may not be able to space travel bc of our dimensional limits nor even live on other planets due to resonance frequency. But the idea of space which our bodies have shown we can't sustain why would an astrophysicist imply celestial bodies are real when we have the science to question whether space travel is possible. Since our earth is around 14hz, us moving to mars which is around 18hz being there significantly affects the very makup of beings on earth. Terraforming is possible but why do it on mars with a mass and spin greater than ours unsure what it would do to our cells. If we could wed be on mars by now but its impossible for our bodies to survive with a different frequency (mass×spin). Until we learn immediately space travel to bodies we can survive in, intergalactic travel will be impossible leaving space travel purposeless. United States woulve sent prisoners to mine the moon (if it werent hollow) and mars immediatelyif we could survive interplanetary conditions.