Размер видео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показать панель управления
Автовоспроизведение
Автоповтор
In the "railroad case" the issue was whether the lady was in the class of persons foreseeably placed at risk by the actor's negligence. Im pretty sure the court's opinion wasn't focused on the manner harm.
+jesse congo it could depend on the casebook, but Palsgraf is extensively used to demonstrate proximate cause.
my tort prof agrees with you and thinks Palsgraf is about duty of care not proximate cause.
Thank you
""ብጣዕሚ ዘገድስን ደስ ዝብልን " : in my native language Tigrinya ( Eritrean language) means , "fascinating and very interesting ." , God bless you .
And, thanks yet again!
Great video
excellent
In the "railroad case" the issue was whether the lady was in the class of persons foreseeably placed at risk by the actor's negligence. Im pretty sure the court's opinion wasn't focused on the manner harm.
+jesse congo it could depend on the casebook, but Palsgraf is extensively used to demonstrate proximate cause.
my tort prof agrees with you and thinks Palsgraf is about duty of care not proximate cause.
Thank you
""ብጣዕሚ ዘገድስን ደስ ዝብልን " : in my native language Tigrinya ( Eritrean language) means , "fascinating and very interesting ." , God bless you .
And, thanks yet again!
Great video
excellent