Can't disagree more. If the "music," in this case I would call it noise, doesn't substantively add to the message, it detracts from it. I found it incredibly distracting.
men...this explanation is better than my cause coordinator lecture note and explanation..his lecture notes take me full year before I understand the topic well. But from this video....no way...it takes me only 4 minutes.
You know when a professor says “I always see when the light goes off in my students head.” Well the light just went off and it was because of RUclips. Thank you for the ambiguous language.
Hi PD. You could be referring to two different things and I'm not sure. Do you mean whether negligence by itself is a basis to sue someone? Or are you referring to independent torts and the economic loss doctrine?
@@USLawEssentials thank you for ur rply sir... Actly i have an assgmnt in this question i searched for it then I got a dbt whether independent tort comes n negligence..
Your instructor is asking whether negligence is a claim in and of itself, or whether negligence is a way that we commit another unlawful action. For example, can we say that plaintiff sued defendant for negligence or that plaintiff sued defendant because he negligently causing someone else's death? I don't know where you are from but your instructor probably wants you to trace the history of how the law views the concept of negligence.
@@USLawEssentials Ya in federal law which like state to state in the USA changes I'm not a lawyer Or a student of law I have a case i am building for a staircase fall in a rental ( no railings 3 or 4 building codes to the stairs) 3 to 4 building codes on other areas And a failure of repair ...this has been a 3+ year issue And just want to Cross my T's and Dot my I's But here is a idea of it Here in Ontario ... What we in Ontario refer to as “contributory negligence,” the U.S. refers to as “comparative fault.” Most states use a system of comparative fault, but there are different variations: Ontario’s contributory negligence rule is most like the “pure comparative fault” rule used in about a dozen states. Under this rule, the plaintiff’s recovery is simply reduced to the extent of his or her own fault.
@@USLawEssentials in the late 1970s, the Supreme Court of Canada imposed a limit on the amount of damages that could be awarded for pain and suffering. These sorts of damages are referred to as “non-pecuniary,” because it’s impossible to put a precise price tag on them. At the time, the limit on pain-and-suffering damages was $100,000. Because of inflation, that limit is approaching $400,000 today This differs in Death Also other awards are gives damages, fee's, owing medical Losing party pays lawyer fees know as the "English rule" As to the states where you pay your own regaurdless here i think Lawyer earnings of the damages is 33.3% This does not cover into your pain and suffering Keep in mind i dont have the full aspect of how it works But normaly its ether a hourly rate with other fees Or pay us at the end sort of deal I am also gathering other cases that fit into the same case i am on where negligence of duty was a factor in slip and falls
How is a “reasonable person defined?” Also, if the individual has say a mental disability, would it be fair to compare them to a “reasonable person” assuming the reasonably person has no mental disability?
You might find this helpful: uslawessentials.com/what-is-the-reasonable-person-standard-in-a-negligence-case/ What is your opinion on the mental disability issue? Why do you think most states believe it is better in negligence cases to protect the interests of the persons who are injured? What might be some better alternatives?
Articulate and informative, Thank you!
very good video and liked how you described what it means to be a reasonable person
This was great!!! I understand everything now
Thanks Shanice. uslawessentials.com
Great information but the background music is incredibly distracting. This goes for all of your videos.
Super helpful video lesson and the music did not interfere with the explanation. Thank you very much for such a high quality video!
Can't disagree more. If the "music," in this case I would call it noise, doesn't substantively add to the message, it detracts from it. I found it incredibly distracting.
men...this explanation is better than my cause coordinator lecture note and explanation..his lecture notes take me full year before I understand the topic well. But from this video....no way...it takes me only 4 minutes.
Most helpful video on the topic. Thank You 😊
Thanks LC! More here: uslawessentials.com
Thats the probable question thats going to be in my engineering exam tomorrow
Thanks for the explanation
never saw such a elaboration...👍
So It's basically like physical neglect that's often done on accident but the accident is very avoidable if try hard and pay proper attention
Nice explanation thanks❤️
Thanks for watching!
You know when a professor says “I always see when the light goes off in my students head.” Well the light just went off and it was because of RUclips. Thank you for the ambiguous language.
Did the Plaintiff look both ways?
Perry was on southpark?
very good video
Thanks, Paul. uslawessentials.com
👍👍
Trespass in en nursing context --pleaseeee help me this question 💕💕
You would need to be more specific with what you are asking please
Hi can you pls explain this to me... When s negligence recognised as an independent tort?
Hi PD. You could be referring to two different things and I'm not sure. Do you mean whether negligence by itself is a basis to sue someone? Or are you referring to independent torts and the economic loss doctrine?
@@USLawEssentials thank you for ur rply sir... Actly i have an assgmnt in this question i searched for it then I got a dbt whether independent tort comes n negligence..
Your instructor is asking whether negligence is a claim in and of itself, or whether negligence is a way that we commit another unlawful action. For example, can we say that plaintiff sued defendant for negligence or that plaintiff sued defendant because he negligently causing someone else's death? I don't know where you are from but your instructor probably wants you to trace the history of how the law views the concept of negligence.
@@USLawEssentials thank you sir...
What about potential damages caused from not following installation instructions of motorcycle handlebars?
Canadian law is diffrent from American law but in Negligence they have the same lines
Thanks, that makes sense. Do you know whether it the same in Quebec, too?
@@USLawEssentials Ya in federal law which like state to state in the USA changes I'm not a lawyer Or a student of law I have a case i am building for a staircase fall in a rental ( no railings 3 or 4 building codes to the stairs) 3 to 4 building codes on other areas And a failure of repair ...this has been a 3+ year issue And just want to Cross my T's and Dot my I's But here is a idea of it Here in Ontario ...
What we in Ontario refer to as “contributory negligence,” the U.S. refers to as “comparative fault.” Most states use a system of comparative fault, but there are different variations:
Ontario’s contributory negligence rule is most like the “pure comparative fault” rule used in about a dozen states. Under this rule, the plaintiff’s recovery is simply reduced to the extent of his or her own fault.
@@USLawEssentials in the late 1970s, the Supreme Court of Canada imposed a limit on the amount of damages that could be awarded for pain and suffering. These sorts of damages are referred to as “non-pecuniary,” because it’s impossible to put a precise price tag on them. At the time, the limit on pain-and-suffering damages was $100,000. Because of inflation, that limit is approaching $400,000 today This differs in Death Also other awards are gives damages, fee's, owing medical Losing party pays lawyer fees know as the "English rule" As to the states where you pay your own regaurdless here i think Lawyer earnings of the damages is 33.3% This does not cover into your pain and suffering Keep in mind i dont have the full aspect of how it works But normaly its ether a hourly rate with other fees Or pay us at the end sort of deal I am also gathering other cases that fit into the same case i am on where negligence of duty was a factor in slip and falls
Hey there. Thanks for the information - - I didn't mean to give you homework! Anyway, please take care and best of success to you.
@@USLawEssentials I think if i win the case I'll be learning US and Canadian law lol minus cornell law school fees : ) stay safe !
Advance Directives
How is a “reasonable person defined?” Also, if the individual has say a mental disability, would it be fair to compare them to a “reasonable person” assuming the reasonably person has no mental disability?
You might find this helpful: uslawessentials.com/what-is-the-reasonable-person-standard-in-a-negligence-case/
What is your opinion on the mental disability issue? Why do you think most states believe it is better in negligence cases to protect the interests of the persons who are injured? What might be some better alternatives?
Sir pllzzz hindi me video bnaye please request
bro Its uslaw so it has to be in english i am just here to learnpractically rather than looking to my book
2018cv00060 juneau county Wisconsin
Of course the lawyer is mustachioed and pin stripe wearing!
Heh. He said doody. 💩💩💩💩
evil looking characters