What are But For and Substantial Factor Causation?

What are But For and Substantial Factor Causation? This video introduces two tests for causation, commonly applied by courts. You will often see this discussion in connection with torts actions based on negligence.
Torts Quizes: www.uslawessentials.com/torts-...
United States Law: An Introduction for International Students is available at:
www.amazon.com/author/daniele...
To discuss further, feel free to send me an email and to comment below. Also, please visit my website:
website: www.uslawessentials.com
blog: www.uslawessentials.com/blog
email:uslawessentials at gmail dot com
Twitter: / uslawessentials

[@danjbundrick]

My head is spinning at the thought that the defendant ripped the tree up by the roots with that giant axe.

[@indaystocome7416]

I'm a first year struggling law student, thank you for your simple wording and heaps of examples It has helped me.

[@USLawEssentials]

Thanks, Tammey! I also tutor law students. uslawessentials.com

[@ronricooandasan9612]

Hi! How are you? Are you on your third year already?

[@eeeshieee]

Aahhh -- this is SO SO helpful! I'm planning to take my tort law exam tonight, and I wasn't entirely sure if the but-for test and substantial-factor test were BOTH required to prove causation. Thank you so much for making this video! You're a lifesaver!

[@fatinalisya4275]

Thanks for the short and simple explanation ! It helps me a lot

[@vale.violet4310]

thank you so much sir ! been struggling to understand this for a long time, but your video makes it so easy to understand

[@thomasbray9646]

Outstanding explanation of 2 in Causation. Thank you!!!

[@USLawEssentials]

Thanks, Thomas. uslawessentials.com

[@hzzofficial]

Thank you so much, I love you for this!

[@hyojinlee]

Thank you for this video❤️

[@ryanjames9123]

Great video!

[@lailaadorable553]

Thank you so much. So clear and understandable

[@USLawEssentials]

Sure, thanks for watching. uslawessentials.com

[@wassuhmufusaLOL]

i love your channel. thank you so so so much

[@USLawEssentials]

Thank you!

[@israfulafrin3594]

Thank you...

[@USLawEssentials]

Sure! uslawessentials.com Let me know if you have any questions.

[@justinejackson1409]

Can you talk about a 3rd element that falls under causation (cause in fact)?
1) but for
2) substantial cause
3) alternative cause

[@USLawEssentials]

Please check out a video on alternative liability:
uslawessentials.com/what-is-alternative-liability/

[@miryamishot]

Thank you so much

[@USLawEssentials]

No worries, Miryam. Any other topics interest you?

[@miryamishot]

USLawEssentials battle of the forms 2-207

[@USLawEssentials]

Here are some older videos, let me know whether you still have questions. My blog has a contact form. uslawessentials.com/blog
ruclips.net/video/ama0epDkt6c/видео.html (mirror image rule)
ruclips.net/video/ZG9cyqluC54/видео.html (UCC modification of mirror image part 1)
ruclips.net/video/44HlgjyQSV8/видео.html (UCC modification of mirror image part 2)

[@katarinachurich5166]

Question - in the last scenario, how would plaintiff be able to hold defendant liable if it doesn't pass the but for or substantial factor test?

[@USLawEssentials]

If there is no causation there is no liability.

[@WokeAfrica]

wow

[@E55666]

You made this seem too easy

[@unic0de-yvr]

> "What are But For"
For pooping, silly.

[@unic0de-yvr]

(ps sorry for spoiling the tenor of this very informative video)

[@USLawEssentials]

No worries, thanks for sharing.

[@charles489]

The example is not proper, by lifting weights, properly performed under all circumstances, your back will become stronger and stronger.

[@shakenblake9]

Your criticism is improper, assuming that lifting weights is always properly performed under all circumstances (and that plaintiff could somehow prove that..)

[@zahirabenmekhloua7826]

if he hadn't taken the axe to the tree, the car would have been ok