I love how she literally wrote the textbook on consumer law and is still so good at playing dumb to get these clowns to rationally explain themselves. She is amazing!
The lady is constantly flawless. She knows every answer before she poses the question. She is a national treasure for the American citizens as a whole, whether they were able to vote for her or not!
@@petrichorgrey Risk what? Katie only asked her political ally questions in this hearing. She refused to ask any questions of people who were against ESG. The GOP just doesn't want this to be compulsory mandated by law, that's all.
@@superraggazio you should do at least a little bit of research before you talk 😂 The European Union has finalized the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”) that will introduce more detailed sustainability reporting requirements for EU companies, non-EU companies meeting certain thresholds for net turnover in the EU and companies with securities listed on a regulated EU market. The CSRD entered into force on January 5, 2023 and is substantially consistent with the provisional version published in June 2022. The rules will be phased in starting from January 1, 2024 for certain large EU and EU-listed companies, and will apply to all in-scope companies by January 1, 2028.
@@RohARc Research on what? My comment was in the US or world? It is also for different reasons and not the same as 2008. *Your comment has nothing to do with what I said.* Are you ok?
The good congresswoman is a very hard working, smart woman. She is a valuable asset to the state of California, where I was born. However, and this is very simple. What republicans want is small government, low taxes, a secure border, and a solution for high gasoline prices and inflation. And, a strong military. That's it.
You could, but it would be the same as voting for Trump. Wait until she's in the primaries. Or better yet, let's cherish her in the position that she is so effective in.
I'm an ESG noob, so I had to look up ESG on Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental,_social,_and_corporate_governance?wprov=sfti1 In short, ESG companies are much more likely to meet a standard of social responsibility, especially with respect to the environment. To me, that sounds like accountability. It can be a way to invest with a conscience. Global warming is real, and it's possible to invest in companies who care about it. That's why you invest in ESG funds. It's not a perfect system, but it's a shorthand way to invest in companies who care about more than just their own bottom line. As to why Katie Porter is upset, I think it's mostly because this hearing was a waste of everyone's time and energy. Republicans don't want companies to use ESG, even though having more investment options and information to guide financial decisions is a good thing. Her Republican counterpart seems to only understand "ESG = Bad." They don't understand the reasoning behind that stance; the evidence is stacked against that stance. So why perpetuate the idea that ESG shouldn't be used? It's pure politics. With the same information and line of reasoning about what ESG is and why investors should be able to invest in ESG-dominant funds, how is it possible to reach such a wildly different conclusion? It was a waste of time and energy to discuss and televise this because there is no need for more expert information. The outcome should simply be that using ESG is encouraged. Having choices should be encouraged. Agency as an idea should be encouraged. The resources used to hold this hearing could have been better spent in many other ways to benefit everyone who lives here. Instead, we are stuck addressing Republican Party (the Party of "No") attacks on us ad nauseum. Ms. Porter, if you see this, do everything you can to talk about goals you'd like to achieve for the people of the United States in the short- and the long-term. Let's please stop wasting resources on changing the minds of those who don't listen to reason. It's not fair to us to let the Party of No dominate the narrative.
Even at the cost of the nation? Some ESG companies are producing good returns. That extention of the critical theory/ neo marxist religion will destroy this country. If you are a investor of any size. Please make an active effort to divest from all ESG associated companies!
@@travissharon1536 If those companies are producing good returns, shouldn't you invest in them? Hello? Also, I don't think you know what critical theory or neo-marxism are. How do those have anything to do with companies wanting to promote sustainable businesses?
@brockb3692 Sustainable business practices and critical social justice are unseperatable. Invest away, when giant investment companies force esg on the entire economy, it's not a good thing. It comes down to "toe the line, or go out of business."
@@travissharon1536 "Unseperatable?" That's not an English word. Maybe you meant to say "inseparable?" If that's the case, then you're arguing that sustainable businesses NEED social justice because they are NOT separate from each other. I think that's actually true. Economies and good companies have to be sustainable in the long-term to be viable. But no investment company is going to force you to invest in DEI.
@brockb3692 I did mean inseparable, thanks for correcting me. Are you familiar with how ESG works? The long term sustainability they are aiming at, is a world without any cultural or moral discrimination. Funding is absolutely denied to companies that don't have good ESG scores, it is a form of ideological force. Would you like a world that forced you to change your values, all the while claiming that their code is the only acceptable way. Forcing rather than convincing breeds resentment. People have criticized the standard narrative of climate. Instead of addressing their questions and critiques people are attacked personally. Shouldn't good ideas be able to defend themselves without resorting to dishonest tactics?
ESG being used to grant credit was not the issue of the hearing. The republicans brought the hearing because they did not want private companies to be required to devulge ESG informationto investors; and they wanted to restrict investment managers from using ESG information as part of their investment decision making.
The problem comes from Blackrock. They have decided to “force behavior “. If the companies do not want to do the whole ESG thing then Blackrock starts pulling investments out of the company. The rest of the investors see that and believe that there must be a problem and divest as well. Causes a real problem just because the companies don't want to go with the ESG bs.
lol thats not a problem that is a business decision. We literally have the business judgment rule in law for this exact reason. we also have derivative and direct suits, so sue. If ESG hurts the company and there is nothing there the court would look at the evidence then make a determination if the directors are operating in the best interest of the companies. its none of the governments business. It is capitalism. Its the markets choice.
@@superraggaziolol exactly. These people are so confused. ESG is derived entirely from capitalism. Banks will invest money in those that have long term profitability. As Representative Porter has said, if you disagree that they are doing this. Sue them. Its not a hard concept
If companies are influenced by the actions of Blackrock, is that Blackrock's fault? Now, if Blackrock has too much influence in the investment world, then the DOJ needs to open a Anti Sherman Trust act investigation on that idea, but not because they use ESG as a tool.
Oh, no, My Dear, when someone mansplained to you that DEI/ESG wasn't a form of reverse discrimination, quite anti-U.S. Constitutional, that, May Dear...that...was the 'stupidest thing" you ever heard. Don't get it twisted.
Well she’s getting what she asked for because people are starting to sue businesses and investment companies over prioritizing ESG scores over the responsibility to their investors
@@frsmith5069 Calling it a talking point is an excuse to dismiss things without addressing them rationally because you have no argument. You don't even know me. Do you really think everyone who opposes communism is right wing?
@@h1r086 Please tell me how investors wishing to have more information about potential investments - that they can choose to use or not to use in their investment decisions is communism? The fact that you are associating principles of the free market economy Porter is advocating for with communism means your grasp of economics is weak, and you don't know what communism is as an actual economic system.
@@frsmith5069 Communism isn't merely an economic system. The economics of communism are merely a means to an end. A tool for control among many. ESG is a social credit system, just like what the CCP uses to publicly shame jaywalkers and weaponize guilt by association as all communist regimes do. You lose social credit points for being associated with others who have low scores. ESG is ideological enforcement of the exact same nature. Everything about it is far left wing (communist) policy. Environmentalism is a marxist narrative. DEI offices are ideological enforcement offices just like how the CCP operates. They can "gather information" without ESG. No amount of gaslighting will change that.
This congressional hearing is significant because the government does give money to these banks. If these banks use ESG they should not receive ANY federal money.
So when your investing your money you dont look at the long term effect that money will have or what other long term effects could possibly alter your original investment? things like global warming, fuck up investments in certain sectors. Its important to look at the enviormental social and political factors that affect the value of the dolllar. and again, its a choice. IF YOU DONT WANT YOUR BANK PERSONALLY TO USE ESG FIND ANOTHER BANK. its sad that has to be said honestly
I have a feeling that despite being a full on progressive I think she is very capable of attracting crossover appeal to get Republicans to vote for her. The voters may not listen to someone like AOC but they would definitely listen to Katie Porter. Therefore, Katie Porter for President 2028!
Listen up Katie.....ESG restrictions are limiting investment options not increasing them. Stupid ideas like this are why you're losing to Adam Schiff in the US Senate race in Cali.
Make the salt lake Temple the new homeless shelter so that we may inspire them that they are still worthy that they may want to pray more do better and know that no matter what point in their life they are at the struggles they have the Lord believes that they are worthy of a safe place a warm place in a beautiful place to sleep and then whatever you guys use a temple for you can just use the homeless shelter for I'm sure that is a very even trade to give the youth homeless place that is just as pretty find the biggest most beautiful Catholic Church in salt lake City and they too can swap Christmas
Katie, run for president. You can smoke Biden, and there will never be another republican president. I have donated to you, and I will again, but I want to donate to your presidential campaign.
Can you please clarify what this means? Like the only meaning I can Garner is she's a S.U.I.T? Because syit is just gibberish if I'm missing the acronym
Oh I think hottubz its pretty clear who's on the struggle bus mentally and is not the congress member having this discussion about ESG and investment economics. But thanks for trying so hard...
Oh goodness I triggered the confused minions!! You poor souls. Join the winning team. Truth is always better than the lies spewed by progressive left. Or don’t!
You say you are poor Katie Porter. With a net worth of 1.5 million dollars, how can you say that? Maybe you aren't able to manage your finances. In which case that would disqualify you for the position you are holding in which you hold others accountable for the responsible spending of American tax dollars.
Someone please give her a simple tutorial in finance and economics. You don't continue to do business with Failing Banks that have already "limited" their ability to allow for More investment potential. A simple education of ESG is needed here!! 🙏
You do know that she is a University professor correct. She needs no education from you. She’s spot on here and looking like the future Senator for California. And I don’t need to listen to her to make sound financial decisions about my investments. I’m seeing wonderful returns on my ESG, exceeding my return on fossil fuel investments (which I dumped because not only are they bad for the environment, but they weren’t making me as much return on my investment). My clean energy, sound governance, and sustainability investments saw greater returns. And again, I don’t need your propaganda. I see my returns and I can count.
@@bernardwylie9760 University Professor Is Not Anything to Tout as Far as Education Goes! Believe Me, I am very capable of Assessing the Facts. She needs a good economic tutorial. Your faulty Leftist propaganda is showing and telling. However, I wish you the best in the next 3-6 months with your "portfolio". Have a nice day. 😊
@@nanpat6762 my portfolio and our country are gonna be just fine dear, with President Biden’s economic leadership, and allies like Professor Porter holding corporate power to account. There is a reason you people hate academics like Porter, Jamie Raskin, and Barack Obama getting involved in our political system, and again, our country is actually better for it. All of these people have made more responsible public servants than anyone you’ll proclaim to support or not support. I’ll say “well, you support Trump”, you’ll claim “I don’t support him. I’m this or I’m that. Trump lives rent free in your liberal heads. I’ll say, “well, you support conservative politicians and right-wing ideology”, you claim “No, I’m independent….yada, yada, yada”. Typical troll, engage, deflect tactics.
@@bernardwylie9760 whoa, you have some serious "I think I know what's in everyone's head" issues. Take a deep breath and chill. I'm relaxing and enjoying life. No time for all your hateful rants. Will not be responding to anymore of it. I do hope you feel better soon.
I thought Kate was pretty good but after watching her in many hearings she really has biased ways. You can play with numbers to suit your Agenda and that's what she does. She doesn't want what best for America but is just committed to her party. I don't want anyone that is committed to their party but committed to Americans.
You should really open your eyes wider and pull the shit out of your ears! Katie Porter is about what is fair and honest for everyone! She is a single mother of three, tell me what her hidden agenda is? Isn't it the Republican party trying to shove their way of thinking down everyone's throat, no matter what the consequences are? Biased is the Republican way, along with Hypocrisy, Racism, Gross Lies,Propaganda and Hate!
If she were telling democrats they needed to make sure investors have better information and more options to help them more effectively invest money - you'd be praising her to high heavn annkazunas7207. That's a dead give away that she's not biased, you are....
You're a Republican party hack. I've seen all of your other comments. You're being disingenuous. The least you could do is to be honest about your partisanship.
@Magamonster 😂😂😂 When you don’t have legitimate commentary points attack the person. Thanks for sharing your lack of reasoning Magamonster. It’s hard to have reasonable points when the logic and ideas you rely on don’t come from your own brain. Have a good one!
I love how she literally wrote the textbook on consumer law and is still so good at playing dumb to get these clowns to rationally explain themselves. She is amazing!
The lady is constantly flawless. She knows every answer before she poses the question. She is a national treasure for the American citizens as a whole, whether they were able to vote for her or not!
It's the young lady behind her that couldn't contain her laughter for me.😂 That would have been me for sure.
The GOP wants to stop this because the dems want to make ESG compulsory.
The purple-haired lady? Sounds about right
@@petrichorgrey Risk what? Katie only asked her political ally questions in this hearing. She refused to ask any questions of people who were against ESG. The GOP just doesn't want this to be compulsory mandated by law, that's all.
I worked in asset management for over 25 years and Katie you could not have explain it better. Awesome!
Katie Porter is one of American’s best representatives. She is smart, articulate and always goes to the heart of the matter when she speaks.
Your right. Katie is one of the best liars therefore best represenatives.
She's also not older than literal sliced bread.
SPOT ON~
Sometimes.
@@maryudomah4387 Bad metaphor. Sliced bread, if it's edible and not stale or moldy, is only a few hours old.
Thanks Katie for your intelligence, clarity and staight fowar approach
YOU GO LADY!!
Katie Porter for Senate!!! Watch this… then chip in a few bucks to her Senate campaign. Let’s do this!🎉
I love the relieved way she says "Thank you...I yield back."
It's sure entertaining to the people behind her, though they aren't bad at hiding it, I'd had been snorting and laughing out loud.
The ladies in the back can’t hold it together 😂
You tell 'em, Katie!
What a total disgrace to common sense.
love this lady
Katie Porter for president!
Love me some Katie Porter. I don't even live in CA and I donated to her Senate campaign
The problem, as I see it, is most republican voters won't understand one thought being presented here.
Da Best ever. Katie Porter is a rock star.
Katie has the mind if an attorney. Ih yes she is one !
I have an idea, Katie Porter should give a mandatory class to ALL incoming members of Congress.
Bravo Katie! 👏
How many banks collapsed already 5 or is it 6
in the US or world? It is also for different reasons and not the same as 2008.
@@superraggazio esg was just finalized in parts of Europe in January of this year.
@@RohARc I'm not sure what that is supposed to mean. I'm not sure you understand what that means.
@@superraggazio you should do at least a little bit of research before you talk 😂
The European Union has finalized the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”) that will introduce more detailed sustainability reporting requirements for EU companies, non-EU companies meeting certain thresholds for net turnover in the EU and companies with securities listed on a regulated EU market. The CSRD entered into force on January 5, 2023 and is substantially consistent with the provisional version published in June 2022.
The rules will be phased in starting from January 1, 2024 for certain large EU and EU-listed companies, and will apply to all in-scope companies by January 1, 2028.
@@RohARc Research on what? My comment was in the US or world? It is also for different reasons and not the same as 2008. *Your comment has nothing to do with what I said.* Are you ok?
The good congresswoman is a very hard working, smart woman. She is a valuable asset to the state of California, where I was born. However, and this is very simple. What republicans want is small government, low taxes, a secure border, and a solution for high gasoline prices and inflation. And, a strong military. That's it.
Can I just write Katie Porter on the Presidential ballot for 2024?
You could, but it would be the same as voting for Trump. Wait until she's in the primaries. Or better yet, let's cherish her in the position that she is so effective in.
They will go the way of Anheuser.
Yea we did that with Bud light
Katie Porter you got my vote 🗳️. Please everyone vote this year
Coming to a Congress near you! The Stupiding: Part 3!
Go Katie!!!
Why can't we find more people like Katie Porter, people with her NO NONSENSE manner, to run for Congress?
Really hope she becomes the senator
I'm an ESG noob, so I had to look up ESG on Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental,_social,_and_corporate_governance?wprov=sfti1 In short, ESG companies are much more likely to meet a standard of social responsibility, especially with respect to the environment. To me, that sounds like accountability. It can be a way to invest with a conscience. Global warming is real, and it's possible to invest in companies who care about it. That's why you invest in ESG funds. It's not a perfect system, but it's a shorthand way to invest in companies who care about more than just their own bottom line.
As to why Katie Porter is upset, I think it's mostly because this hearing was a waste of everyone's time and energy. Republicans don't want companies to use ESG, even though having more investment options and information to guide financial decisions is a good thing. Her Republican counterpart seems to only understand "ESG = Bad." They don't understand the reasoning behind that stance; the evidence is stacked against that stance. So why perpetuate the idea that ESG shouldn't be used? It's pure politics. With the same information and line of reasoning about what ESG is and why investors should be able to invest in ESG-dominant funds, how is it possible to reach such a wildly different conclusion? It was a waste of time and energy to discuss and televise this because there is no need for more expert information. The outcome should simply be that using ESG is encouraged. Having choices should be encouraged. Agency as an idea should be encouraged. The resources used to hold this hearing could have been better spent in many other ways to benefit everyone who lives here. Instead, we are stuck addressing Republican Party (the Party of "No") attacks on us ad nauseum.
Ms. Porter, if you see this, do everything you can to talk about goals you'd like to achieve for the people of the United States in the short- and the long-term. Let's please stop wasting resources on changing the minds of those who don't listen to reason. It's not fair to us to let the Party of No dominate the narrative.
Quit shoving ESG down our throat !
This is a college education 4u
Can states even prohibit municipalities from banking with banks that choose to boycott gun manufacturers and fossil fuel companies?
ESG is a stupid plan but if individual investors wish to use it then fine. However, I will invest in the highest returns, period.
Even at the cost of the nation? Some ESG companies are producing good returns. That extention of the critical theory/ neo marxist religion will destroy this country. If you are a investor of any size. Please make an active effort to divest from all ESG associated companies!
@@travissharon1536 If those companies are producing good returns, shouldn't you invest in them? Hello?
Also, I don't think you know what critical theory or neo-marxism are. How do those have anything to do with companies wanting to promote sustainable businesses?
@brockb3692 Sustainable business practices and critical social justice are unseperatable. Invest away, when giant investment companies force esg on the entire economy, it's not a good thing. It comes down to "toe the line, or go out of business."
@@travissharon1536 "Unseperatable?" That's not an English word. Maybe you meant to say "inseparable?" If that's the case, then you're arguing that sustainable businesses NEED social justice because they are NOT separate from each other. I think that's actually true. Economies and good companies have to be sustainable in the long-term to be viable.
But no investment company is going to force you to invest in DEI.
@brockb3692 I did mean inseparable, thanks for correcting me.
Are you familiar with how ESG works? The long term sustainability they are aiming at, is a world without any cultural or moral discrimination.
Funding is absolutely denied to companies that don't have good ESG scores, it is a form of ideological force.
Would you like a world that forced you to change your values, all the while claiming that their code is the only acceptable way. Forcing rather than convincing breeds resentment.
People have criticized the standard narrative of climate. Instead of addressing their questions and critiques people are attacked personally. Shouldn't good ideas be able to defend themselves without resorting to dishonest tactics?
Bcz is stupid to use ESG to grant credit. It doesn't tell you if they're a bad risk or not!!!! Get real!
ESG being used to grant credit was not the issue of the hearing. The republicans brought the hearing because they did not want private companies to be required to devulge ESG informationto investors; and they wanted to restrict investment managers from using ESG information as part of their investment decision making.
The problem comes from Blackrock. They have decided to “force behavior “. If the companies do not want to do the whole ESG thing then Blackrock starts pulling investments out of the company. The rest of the investors see that and believe that there must be a problem and divest as well. Causes a real problem just because the companies don't want to go with the ESG bs.
lol thats not a problem that is a business decision. We literally have the business judgment rule in law for this exact reason. we also have derivative and direct suits, so sue. If ESG hurts the company and there is nothing there the court would look at the evidence then make a determination if the directors are operating in the best interest of the companies. its none of the governments business. It is capitalism. Its the markets choice.
@@superraggaziolol exactly. These people are so confused. ESG is derived entirely from capitalism. Banks will invest money in those that have long term profitability. As Representative Porter has said, if you disagree that they are doing this. Sue them. Its not a hard concept
If companies are influenced by the actions of Blackrock, is that Blackrock's fault? Now, if Blackrock has too much influence in the investment world, then the DOJ needs to open a Anti Sherman Trust act investigation on that idea, but not because they use ESG as a tool.
Or you can legislate it out of existence so that lawsuits are unnecessary.
ESG is disgusting, that's why.
The Bud Light people would probably agree if they weren't afraid of the globalists.
IGNORANT PEOPLE MAKE STUPID STATEMENTS WHEN THEY CANNOT EXPLAIN THEM.
I hope in all that is right that this woman gets to a more effective position in the next administration.
Hey, too bad if you don't like the laws that are passed. It's for your own good. Do as you're told.
Porter and Haggmen are ball buster
Thank you Katie❤. And I'm sorry you had to sit through that.
she or it won't be there long
Well your still breathing.
These GOP-led house hearings are a JOKE. KP made solid points here. Cut the crap, MAGA. You’re wasting everyone’s time and money.
Oh, no, My Dear, when someone mansplained to you that DEI/ESG wasn't a form of reverse discrimination, quite anti-U.S. Constitutional, that, May Dear...that...was the 'stupidest thing" you ever heard. Don't get it twisted.
When ESG policies reduce investor returns investors need to speak up.
Purple hair weirdo in the back.
I don't like it when they use acronyms wtf is ESG?
You and yours, Prep. Porter, first fix California, which you where elected to represent... then we'll talk.
Can i be the driver of the struggle bus ? Sounds entertaining
Well she’s getting what she asked for because people are starting to sue businesses and investment companies over prioritizing ESG scores over the responsibility to their investors
ESG is a social credit system, like the CCP's. DEI are commissar offices, like the CCP's.
Exactly !
wow social media and right wing news talking points here... soooo surprised!
@@frsmith5069 Calling it a talking point is an excuse to dismiss things without addressing them rationally because you have no argument. You don't even know me. Do you really think everyone who opposes communism is right wing?
@@h1r086 Please tell me how investors wishing to have more information about potential investments - that they can choose to use or not to use in their investment decisions is communism? The fact that you are associating principles of the free market economy Porter is advocating for with communism means your grasp of economics is weak, and you don't know what communism is as an actual economic system.
@@frsmith5069 Communism isn't merely an economic system. The economics of communism are merely a means to an end. A tool for control among many. ESG is a social credit system, just like what the CCP uses to publicly shame jaywalkers and weaponize guilt by association as all communist regimes do. You lose social credit points for being associated with others who have low scores. ESG is ideological enforcement of the exact same nature. Everything about it is far left wing (communist) policy. Environmentalism is a marxist narrative. DEI offices are ideological enforcement offices just like how the CCP operates. They can "gather information" without ESG. No amount of gaslighting will change that.
This congressional hearing is significant because the government does give money to these banks. If these banks use ESG they should not receive ANY federal money.
So when your investing your money you dont look at the long term effect that money will have or what other long term effects could possibly alter your original investment?
things like global warming, fuck up investments in certain sectors. Its important to look at the enviormental social and political factors that affect the value of the dolllar.
and again, its a choice. IF YOU DONT WANT YOUR BANK PERSONALLY TO USE ESG FIND ANOTHER BANK.
its sad that has to be said honestly
If people boycott these ESG forced stores how much money are they making in a boycott
She is truly a nasty, angry, spouse abuser
Spouse abuser?? It was the other way around! And she's a lot less angry and nasty than MTG, if you care to admit it!!
@@Dan-sc7us LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!! What an idiot would say for a thousand?
@@Dan-sc7usnobody said anything about mgt lol Porter is an unfortunate looking heifer. She is a terrible employer and spousal abuse is abuse.
I have a feeling that despite being a full on progressive I think she is very capable of attracting crossover appeal to get Republicans to vote for her. The voters may not listen to someone like AOC but they would definitely listen to Katie Porter. Therefore, Katie Porter for President 2028!
HEYYY YOOOUUUU GUUUYYYSSS!! 😂
Well HELLO!
Taking away choices = monopolization
Katie Porter is the smartest Rep we have, and I hope she wins the Senate seat next year!
Smart to you, because you are ignorant of political theory.
You must be gay!
Yeah if the election is stolen demoncrats steal elections
Bawhahah- she just likes to hear the sound of her own voice - she is just a spouse abuser
If she's the smartest, I'll pray for you
Why is this person talking
Earning the best returns for investors should be the primary focus of any financial instrument.
Gauge a politician by their family relationships.
@KatiePorter struggles to understand stupid....
Down with ESG !!!
Leave and raise the collective IQ of the room.
Leave the smart ones like MTG and 'Bobo" Boebert!!
Hahahaha!!!!!
Same with you in comment sections.
Allowing freedom to invest wholesale is how you end up with pension funds being cratered by investment in crypto funds
Show me any investor with a good investment record who uses esg and i will pay off the national debt.
Given that investments rise and fall on their long term profitability ESG has relevant measures....
really people stop being right or left and give this lady credit. she is right ALOT. on this one she is wrong. nobody knows everything
You can tell that to Budweiser and Target....
Listen up Katie.....ESG restrictions are limiting investment options not increasing them. Stupid ideas like this are why you're losing to Adam Schiff in the US Senate race in Cali.
Do please explain in a language as simple as Katie Porter's why she is wrong. If you cannot do that then shut the f up.
There are no ESG restrictions.
Make the salt lake Temple the new homeless shelter so that we may inspire them that they are still worthy that they may want to pray more do better and know that no matter what point in their life they are at the struggles they have the Lord believes that they are worthy of a safe place a warm place in a beautiful place to sleep and then whatever you guys use a temple for you can just use the homeless shelter for I'm sure that is a very even trade to give the youth homeless place that is just as pretty find the biggest most beautiful Catholic Church in salt lake City and they too can swap Christmas
She spoke much, but said very little.
I think you prefer covfefe?
Katie, run for president. You can smoke Biden, and there will never be another republican president. I have donated to you, and I will again, but I want to donate to your presidential campaign.
This Katie Porter really is struggling. Should she really be in the position she is holding?
Was her argument for or against? Her trying to get a gotcha moment, If she paid any attention to ESG arrgued against ESG!
Melsbeth if you didn't get her gotcha moment, I don't think you understand the conversation. SMH
Batch, you will never get off the struggle bus.
She looks smart 😂
🥶😵😤🤡👺👿👎
LMAO !!!
This woman is a SEE YOU IN TEA.
She is a DUMPOCRAP.
Can you please clarify what this means? Like the only meaning I can Garner is she's a S.U.I.T? Because syit is just gibberish if I'm missing the acronym
She IS on the struggle bus. Mentally.
Oh I think hottubz its pretty clear who's on the struggle bus mentally and is not the congress member having this discussion about ESG and investment economics. But thanks for trying so hard...
@@frsmith5069 lol good one! Not very original, I wish you had tried.
@@hottubz1965 That's all you've got hottubz, I should have guessed....The first comment wasn't too bright either - lacking substance for sure! 🤣
Oh goodness I triggered the confused minions!! You poor souls. Join the winning team. Truth is always better than the lies spewed by progressive left. Or don’t!
You say you are poor Katie Porter. With a net worth of 1.5 million dollars, how can you say that? Maybe you aren't able to manage your finances. In which case that would disqualify you for the position you are holding in which you hold others accountable for the responsible spending of American tax dollars.
Someone please give her a simple tutorial in finance and economics.
You don't continue to do business with Failing Banks that have already "limited" their ability to allow for More investment potential.
A simple education of ESG is needed here!! 🙏
How about an education in DUMPOCRAPS and the DAMAGE DONE and FURTHER DAMAGE that WILL BE DONE...
You do know that she is a University professor correct. She needs no education from you. She’s spot on here and looking like the future Senator for California. And I don’t need to listen to her to make sound financial decisions about my investments. I’m seeing wonderful returns on my ESG, exceeding my return on fossil fuel investments (which I dumped because not only are they bad for the environment, but they weren’t making me as much return on my investment). My clean energy, sound governance, and sustainability investments saw greater returns. And again, I don’t need your propaganda. I see my returns and I can count.
@@bernardwylie9760 University Professor Is Not Anything to Tout as Far as Education Goes! Believe Me, I am very capable of Assessing the Facts. She needs a good economic tutorial.
Your faulty Leftist propaganda is showing and telling. However, I wish you the best in the next 3-6 months with your "portfolio". Have a nice day. 😊
@@nanpat6762 my portfolio and our country are gonna be just fine dear, with President Biden’s economic leadership, and allies like Professor Porter holding corporate power to account. There is a reason you people hate academics like Porter, Jamie Raskin, and Barack Obama getting involved in our political system, and again, our country is actually better for it. All of these people have made more responsible public servants than anyone you’ll proclaim to support or not support. I’ll say “well, you support Trump”, you’ll claim “I don’t support him. I’m this or I’m that. Trump lives rent free in your liberal heads. I’ll say, “well, you support conservative politicians and right-wing ideology”, you claim “No, I’m independent….yada, yada, yada”. Typical troll, engage, deflect tactics.
@@bernardwylie9760 whoa, you have some serious "I think I know what's in everyone's head" issues. Take a deep breath and chill.
I'm relaxing and enjoying life. No time for all your hateful rants. Will not be responding to anymore of it. I do hope you feel better soon.
Katie porter is a hoarder in real life
I thought Kate was pretty good but after watching her in many hearings she really has biased ways. You can play with numbers to suit your Agenda and that's what she does. She doesn't want what best for America but is just committed to her party. I don't want anyone that is committed to their party but committed to Americans.
You should really open your eyes wider and pull the shit out of your ears! Katie Porter is about what is fair and honest for everyone! She is a single mother of three, tell me what her hidden agenda is? Isn't it the Republican party trying to shove their way of thinking down everyone's throat, no matter what the consequences are? Biased is the Republican way, along with Hypocrisy, Racism, Gross Lies,Propaganda and Hate!
Then you definitely don’t want any Republicans lol!
If she were telling democrats they needed to make sure investors have better information and more options to help them more effectively invest money - you'd be praising her to high heavn annkazunas7207. That's a dead give away that she's not biased, you are....
You're a Republican party hack. I've seen all of your other comments. You're being disingenuous. The least you could do is to be honest about your partisanship.
@Magamonster 😂😂😂 When you don’t have legitimate commentary points attack the person. Thanks for sharing your lack of reasoning Magamonster. It’s hard to have reasonable points when the logic and ideas you rely on don’t come from your own brain. Have a good one!
Anyone else immediately think of Ms. Piggy when you saw this thumbnail?
I wish Katie would give a try for the presidency. Men have had 250 years to screw everything up. Let’s let a woman give it a try!
LMAO !!!
Boy they gave all the boxcheckers a bit of America and all trans get a voice.Thiz is all bad juju
PORTER is notorious for running ads where she doesn't tell you her party affiliation ! They are scared and ASHAMED OF WHAT THEY HAVE BECOME !
I noticed that, I wondered which tribe she was.