Fun fact: Andrew Tate's Dad was a International Master and even Hikaru called him a "Legendary Tactician" sadly he passed away in 2015 in a Chess Tournament
@@Sanamxnmthe fact that Andrew tate is a 1800 ELO chess player, and he can barely even win against a 600 ELO chess player (3 times less) is just depressing
@@TherabbitthemyththelegendELO rating is just a rough measure. Just because someone has a lower rating doesn’t necessarily mean they are bad at chess, it just means they haven’t climed up the ELO ladder, if you only play casually irl chess your ELO can’t increase.
For those wondering why the eval bar went up to the middle again after Nf3, Andrew should’ve played Be6+ resulting in a free queen if Kxe6 or any other move except for Kd8, or a free bishop if after Kd8 he played Qxe8+.
No it’s not. Be6+ is a loss for white. King just takes it and queen isn’t hanging. The move the computer was looking for is ng6. Black can’t capture the knight because it loses the rook.
@@sauce5218 If you do Ng6, they respond with Qe8, pinning the Queen to the Knight, and if you check the king on e6, discovered attack with the bishop, and if you don't move the Queen you lose the knight. Perhaps another check does the trick? Tricky position.
Engine says Tate played at 58.1% accuracy. 1 Great Move 5 Best Moves 2 Excellent Moves 3 Good Moves 3 Book Moves 2 ?! Inaccuracies 1 ? Mistake 1 ?? Blunder 4 X Misses
Yeah bad game but chess nuke did find his account he is 1600 rated wasn’t lying but very poor game but it happens I average 70%+ I’m 1100 rated but I still have terrible games aswell espicsllt irl I play worse than online
@@notnoahqlapped9575this guy is lying all the time. Just bc there is a Tate account doesn't mean that he personally plays on it. He also lied about being a chess champion as a kid or that his father was the first black GM while he wasn't a GM at all
@@mitternachtsplausch9559 where did he say that? I am not tate fan but I do like chess and iv'e heard him say stuff like "my father was the highest rated black player" never that he was a GM. Do you have a link?
@@BasicGambler clearly the game shows how much knowledge he had. Just because he lost his queen in a 5 minute match doesn't mean that your better than him, "gotham-chess" an international master who is way better than you blundered his queen to an 800. And tate still won the game quickly anyway
Im 1155 and so far loosing a queen means resignation in my elo level so either he is good or extreamly bad that he doesnt know you can resign in chess 😅
@@LOLzum101 open and closed positions is something anyone who plays chess at all knows about. They might not know the tactics, but know what it means and can recognize an open or closed position.
@@LOLzum101 ah ok, i guess since you said so 😅 Do you not know what open and closed position means? Its very simple, i dont know why you think just knowing what it means is something higher rated players would know. Its not complicated at all to recognize if a position is open or closed. Not saying this in condescending way, its just very easy to understand concept. Like i said though most low rated players just recognize the positions, but don’t really have tactics or understanding of why it matters.
@@fintan9218 it's not something the average person knows about I can only assume you're autistic or you havnt played chess with many people in real life. Open or closed positions are not what the average person thinks about when playing chess especially not a 600 rated casual
Both played pretty bad to be honest. They didn’t follow opening principles, which is expected from someone 600 ELO, but I thought Tate was supposed to be good. He played a lot of dubious moves.
he is good at making people believing in what he says. Its the same with his business, he makes people think he is way more rich and successfull than he really is. He is bragging about being a good chess players. He brags about 1800 rating, which is not even good, but most people thinks tate is a great chess player when he is not much better than a beginner.
@@Madara_Uchiha69420 even a 1200 will beat a 600 easily, tate is clearly lying he doesn't even know basic opening theories for example you are never supposed to bring out queen that early in the game before castling , he also didn't developed his every piece his knight and bishop were under developed, he didnt take control of centre and these are theories that a 500 player knows
This was both painful to watch and highly amusing. Andrew is a similar level to me and although I can constantly spot errors he makes I find it somewhat painful to know that I must make similar constant errors.
What is your rating? Tate is a well above average player and must be at least a 1800+ Elo based on a few games I’ve seen videos of although he made a few mistakes here and blundered his Queen 🤔
@@Charles_KTN He only made one big mistake which was the queen blunder. Youre 1100 and have the audacity to estimate someones skill as if youre an expert lmao
@@coldclearkt well, even on lowest levels people play openings, maybe not so complicated but still. You can't just play anything. If you paly f3 g4 you are not getting away with this even at 500 elo
@@dracibojovnik420not true. If they’re actually that smart, they don’t start that low in elo, their skill gets “appraised” in their first game or two. You will never see someone rated 300 in elo who’s on the level of a 2000. Because to get a rating you have to atleast have a few games played. They’d never get rated that low initially if their skill is actually in the 2000s
Agreed, I'm 500 ELO and dude in the video is only moving pawns and not developing pieces, or trying to control center. Most people play against me do this 400-550 ELO. Also he has not strategy.
@@zytaxrr4192he knows how the pieces move but that's it. He's like a 400 ELO tops. A 600 would know to develop pieces in the opening, this guy just pushed pawns 😂
@@myhatmygandhi6217600 elo is an absolutely dogshit rating, players from 400 to 800 are all equally shit at chess. This guy could very well be 800. There's no such thing as "piece development" at those levels, keep coping.
At 2:23 Tate should have taken the pawn with the bishop which would have saved his queen. Him coming back and winning still was impressive from gate and bad from his opponent
The top G is most likely 800 or 900 which is not so good tbh and nothing compared to his father, but we should be glad that he will boost Chess’s popularity and he’s not bad either, just mid.
The dude he's playing is not 600 ELO, he played more like a beginner. Andrew Tate pulled out Queen early risking losing on development, I would've mated him easy. He won cuz the other guy (black) was playing really bad..
@@evanhager4266 no hes just not as good as yall think he is, the people whove never played chess in their lives just overhype him when in reality hes just an early intermediete
Bro this game doesn't mean anything, I usually don't think at all when playing against low rated opponents and mistakes happen but I eventually win, I'm 1700 and I think tate is around this level based of his other games.
@@Spamacjxjc you can win a game of chess without any checks and just get checkmate. It’s not like the count up the points at the end “now you got 9 checks so that’s 9 points I got checkmate so that’s 5 you win!”
At 1:12 Tate missed that he could’ve played Bb6 with check, if the other guy took the bishop with his king, Tate could’ve won the queen for free, if he retreated to a dark square Tate could’ve added pressure to taking his queen creating a battery with the bishop and creating a mating net. Honestly this entire game made them both look like 500 elo, just lots of missed tactics, overextended pawns on both sides etc
What do you mean he wanted queens on the board?If he played that he would win a queen for a bishop! What is there to think about? He just didn't see it and a few moves later he trapped his own queen
@@light-water What do you mean just a bishop?If you play it like that and you trade queens and you win a bishop its a HUGE lead! It's not about keeping queens on the board it's about getting closer to an endgame where you are a bishop up and a fcked up king...no one would ever be like oh i dont want a free bishop because i dont wanna trade queens there! He just didn't see it.
There are basic 'rules' (always exceptions, of course) but one of them is; your queen should not be your furthest forward piece - you are asking for trouble. You are inviting your opponent to attack it, whilst developing their own pieces, and all you're doing is moving your queen around... You're welcome :)
I advise everyone to try learn the game of chess, its a game of complete accountability. If you lose its because at some point you made a mistake there is no luck in chess at all its the purest form of competition.
0:57 why wouldn't you play Ng6 there?!?! That traps the opponents rook. Instead retreats the knight back to f3?!?! 😂 😂 Yah Andrew tate is not much stronger than his opponent anyway.
I'm sorry, but there is no way black is even 600 Elo. He made nothing but pawn moves for so long. Looks more like 200 Elo tbh. As someone who is around 600 Elo, I've never had an opponent that didn't understand to focus on developing their pieces in the opening. This is more like someone who just learned how the pieces move.
Andrew got his Queen trapped 4 moves ago when he didn't move it to h3, (white square, baiting his opponent to brake dark square pawn position allowing him options to clean house). How someone who's stayed at a consistent ~1800 elo doesn't see that I don't get, considering I just started learning chess seriously and I saw that immediately.
I'm currently at 600 ELO and you see huge blunders from time to time. I'm also _SO_ tired of everyone trying to go for Scholar's mate. Hopefully will be out of this rathole in a few weeks.
@@j00flmao im like 200 elo and because normally i get paired with people who are as bad as me I always go for a variation of scholars mate and it works 30% of the time
Naw I won’t judge Andrew here. I’ve blundered like crazy against lower-rated players too (due to me not being as careful, as I’m sure was the case with him as well). Happens to the best of us
@@gameothers2022 I'm a 1400-rated player. I've noticed that I play my worst games against 800s-1000s, because they're at the level where they can capitalize when you make a huge blunder, but you don't take them seriously enough to concentrate on the game. Andrew likely thought he had the game in the bank, and since lower-rated players play very unorthodoxly, and you can't be bothered to really think against them, you play stupid moves. I'm pretty sure that's what happened to Andrew here, because there's no way an 1800 rated player regularly plays like that
Love the 800s in the chat saying “he is no where near 1700 he blundered a lot” when they would get their queen forked 4 turns in against a decent player
@@noahbrandt2959 In a normal chess game when you are down with a pawn the best you can fight for is a draw. When you are -6 points the chances to make a victory versus normal chess player are negative.
600 guy is playing exactly how I would doing some goofy sh-t moving my king around like he's discovering new foreign (albeit dangerous) lands. Respect. One should evoke the spirit of Alexander The Great when he plays and not give a single F about where he goes.
I don't like the guy but we all blunder sometimes. You can usually get away with a lot when the opposing player is lower rated. So, no, I don't think he was losing just because his position was much worse after he blundered with the queen.
@@pushupkid4203 The position may be objectively losing but that doesn't mean you are going to lose the game. Top-rated players often play objectively bad openings on streams or make funky moves or even give up some of their pieces just to have some fun. Their position would be losing against other top-rated players but that does not mean mediocre or even very good players are actually good enough to capitalize on these mistakes, which is why they're doing it. If Usain Bolt gave me a lead start in a race, that does not mean I'll win the race even he's objectively losing at the beginning.
I just can’t see him being 1,700 rated, I’m around 1,400 and I don’t feel I’d have much issue with either of these players.. my dad on the other hand he’s not a trained player just super smart and great at the game. He’d smoke em
Fun fact: Andrew Tate's Dad was a International Master and even Hikaru called him a "Legendary Tactician" sadly he passed away in 2015 in a Chess Tournament
no fucking shit 💀💀
Everyone knew that
@@cookiefan7930he fun fact is Andrew's father is a great chess player
He died behind the chess board?
Bro got checkmated 💀
That was a painful game to watch; both of them played horrendously.
Wuat do yoy you expect from 600 elo players
@@Sanamxnmthe fact that Andrew tate is a 1800 ELO chess player, and he can barely even win against a 600 ELO chess player (3 times less) is just depressing
@@TherabbitthemyththelegendELO rating is just a rough measure. Just because someone has a lower rating doesn’t necessarily mean they are bad at chess, it just means they haven’t climed up the ELO ladder, if you only play casually irl chess your ELO can’t increase.
@@Settiis bro u are so delusional. Elo is rough sure, but if someone is 1200 ELO above someone else, they shouldn’t have a hard time beating them
@@Therabbitthemyththelegend Nope bro, you just can’t read.
tate went from +3 to -9 to#1
-6?
@@leonfdawson 😄
No chance andrew is higher than elo 1400
@@jjjyli6861500-1600 rated if i remember correctly.
@@jjjyli6861688 blitz right now.
For those wondering why the eval bar went up to the middle again after Nf3, Andrew should’ve played Be6+ resulting in a free queen if Kxe6 or any other move except for Kd8, or a free bishop if after Kd8 he played Qxe8+.
No it’s not. Be6+ is a loss for white. King just takes it and queen isn’t hanging. The move the computer was looking for is ng6. Black can’t capture the knight because it loses the rook.
Ahh you’re talking about a move later when the eval bar evens out after Qg4 not Nf3
@@texastitan6567 Ye,after Kd7 white wins a free rook after Ng7 because the queen pins the pawn and it's a free rook
@@sauce5218 If you do Ng6, they respond with Qe8, pinning the Queen to the Knight, and if you check the king on e6, discovered attack with the bishop, and if you don't move the Queen you lose the knight. Perhaps another check does the trick?
Tricky position.
@@applec4224. Ng6 Qe8
2.Nxf8 check QXf8
Now you just give checks etc the king is very weak
this game made me dumber
That's why I wouldn't stay until the bitter end.
Engine says Tate played at 58.1% accuracy.
1 Great Move
5 Best Moves
2 Excellent Moves
3 Good Moves
3 Book Moves
2 ?! Inaccuracies
1 ? Mistake
1 ?? Blunder
4 X Misses
Yeah bad game but chess nuke did find his account he is 1600 rated wasn’t lying but very poor game but it happens I average 70%+ I’m 1100 rated but I still have terrible games aswell espicsllt irl I play worse than online
I don’t think I have played a bullet game this bad.
@@hammadkhan11280ehis I didn’t chess nuke did.
@@notnoahqlapped9575this guy is lying all the time. Just bc there is a Tate account doesn't mean that he personally plays on it. He also lied about being a chess champion as a kid or that his father was the first black GM while he wasn't a GM at all
@@mitternachtsplausch9559 where did he say that? I am not tate fan but I do like chess and iv'e heard him say stuff like "my father was the highest rated black player" never that he was a GM. Do you have a link?
The last pawn move by Tate’s opponent was a poor move that cost him the game.
No kidding?
No way!! I didn't notice that
Thats something that hikaru would say
I think going king c8 and he would be ok
it's never too late to lose a game of chess in one move...
He claimed to be 1600 elo now i'm confident that I can beat him without my queen.
tbf one game doesn’t prove much, everyone has bad games.
He's definitely not 1600
I'm a 1400 player and the amount of blunders and misses from Tate wows me.
@@sealcraft4353that is not true chess is chess, there some mistakes good players won't do😊
@@sealcraft4353one game shows tactica and positional understanding stop lying to yourself
@@BasicGambler clearly the game shows how much knowledge he had. Just because he lost his queen in a 5 minute match doesn't mean that your better than him, "gotham-chess" an international master who is way better than you blundered his queen to an 800. And tate still won the game quickly anyway
How Tate voluntarily traps his Queen and the 600 ELO guy miraculously found it is just, priceless. I'd say Tate's rating is like a 900 to 1000andish.
hes a 1600 blitz
@@don_walker1Really? That's not bad.
@@Joewest2k11 yea he’s not his father but he’s actually decent
@@don_walker1Cool, thanks for the info!
Im 1155 and so far loosing a queen means resignation in my elo level so either he is good or extreamly bad that he doesnt know you can resign in chess 😅
I dont think the dude knew what he was doin. This is why u shouldnt close the position when you’re winning
you say the guy doesnt know what hes doing then talk about open and closed positions as if he would know what that is lmao
@@LOLzum101 open and closed positions is something anyone who plays chess at all knows about. They might not know the tactics, but know what it means and can recognize an open or closed position.
@@fintan9218 absolutely not youre just straight up wrong
@@LOLzum101 ah ok, i guess since you said so 😅 Do you not know what open and closed position means? Its very simple, i dont know why you think just knowing what it means is something higher rated players would know. Its not complicated at all to recognize if a position is open or closed. Not saying this in condescending way, its just very easy to understand concept.
Like i said though most low rated players just recognize the positions, but don’t really have tactics or understanding of why it matters.
@@fintan9218 it's not something the average person knows about I can only assume you're autistic or you havnt played chess with many people in real life. Open or closed positions are not what the average person thinks about when playing chess especially not a 600 rated casual
Both played pretty bad to be honest. They didn’t follow opening principles, which is expected from someone 600 ELO, but I thought Tate was supposed to be good. He played a lot of dubious moves.
he is good at making people believing in what he says. Its the same with his business, he makes people think he is way more rich and successfull than he really is. He is bragging about being a good chess players. He brags about 1800 rating, which is not even good, but most people thinks tate is a great chess player when he is not much better than a beginner.
@@jutanboy he probably is like 1400-1600 elo level and just blundered cause he underestimated the opponent lol , it does happen
@@jutanboy he makes 20m a month just from his course
@@Madara_Uchiha69420 even a 1200 will beat a 600 easily, tate is clearly lying he doesn't even know basic opening theories for example you are never supposed to bring out queen that early in the game before castling , he also didn't developed his every piece his knight and bishop were under developed, he didnt take control of centre and these are theories that a 500 player knows
@@jutanboy1800 is good lol especially when compared to the world
This was both painful to watch and highly amusing. Andrew is a similar level to me and although I can constantly spot errors he makes I find it somewhat painful to know that I must make similar constant errors.
yeah, its much harder to see your own errors when you're actively playing a game
What is your rating?
Tate is a well above average player and must be at least a 1800+ Elo based on a few games I’ve seen videos of although he made a few mistakes here and blundered his Queen 🤔
@Liberty_Freedom_Brotherhood umm excuse me 😂 my highest rating is 1869, Tate played at 1000 tops here my friend
@@lukeedward97481400 no 1000 is finding that mate my friend and btw I’m 2000
@@Charles_KTN He only made one big mistake which was the queen blunder. Youre 1100 and have the audacity to estimate someones skill as if youre an expert lmao
i dont play chess, but andrew tate's face seems like someone who is freaking out because their opponent doesnt play by the meta
If in chess someone doesn't play meta they lose. They just both played very stupid
They played theory until c6... Then Tate made a few okay moves... But then, yes...
@@Daniluk05 wrong unless it's at the highest level
@@coldclearkt well, even on lowest levels people play openings, maybe not so complicated but still. You can't just play anything. If you paly f3 g4 you are not getting away with this even at 500 elo
If that guy is 600 elo, I’m Magnus Carlsen
@@dracibojovnik420not true. If they’re actually that smart, they don’t start that low in elo, their skill gets “appraised” in their first game or two. You will never see someone rated 300 in elo who’s on the level of a 2000. Because to get a rating you have to atleast have a few games played. They’d never get rated that low initially if their skill is actually in the 2000s
@@dracibojovnik420it can absolutely not be like that
not a chess guy?
Agreed, I'm 500 ELO and dude in the video is only moving pawns and not developing pieces, or trying to control center.
Most people play against me do this 400-550 ELO. Also he has not strategy.
@@GamerproNL if u really 500 you have no idea what you’re talking about lmaoo
that guy has elo like 100
no a 100 doesn't know how the pieces move
No.
@@zytaxrr4192he knows how the pieces move but that's it. He's like a 400 ELO tops. A 600 would know to develop pieces in the opening, this guy just pushed pawns 😂
@@myhatmygandhi6217600 elo is an absolutely dogshit rating, players from 400 to 800 are all equally shit at chess. This guy could very well be 800. There's no such thing as "piece development" at those levels, keep coping.
@@myhatmygandhi6217400 is too much
Prolly 100-300
Where do we get those chess pieces? They look great.
Same thing I was wondering
At 2:23 Tate should have taken the pawn with the bishop which would have saved his queen. Him coming back and winning still was impressive from gate and bad from his opponent
Where?
There are alot of ways to save the queen
That's what someone below 400 elo would think 🙃
1:21 Andrew missed be6
Won't he kill bishop with that?
If he takes then Tate takes queen.
That's a great move didn't even realize it
it does not win the queen vecause of king e8 but does win the bishop tho
Yeah, well spotted.
I’m a 1,000 and tate looks 200-300 better than me
3:04 Andrew Tate almost losing except it's not over yet bro
The top G is most likely 800 or 900 which is not so good tbh and nothing compared to his father, but we should be glad that he will boost Chess’s popularity and he’s not bad either, just mid.
tristan probably inherited father's chess skills.
I would say it's bad. The middle schoolers I have to watch in aftercare are in 1200-1400.
@@ImotekhtheStormlord-tx2it dont insult a dead person lil bro , he father was great at chess , this guy should stick to kick boxing
I heard once he was like 1800 but by seeing this game I don't think so
@@ImotekhtheStormlord-tx2itu don’t inherit chess skills ffs
looks like a gorgeous chess set that has been mistreated
Andrew tate missed a check mate in tow 2:29 d5 then bishop b6
His queen is under attack.
Doesn't work.
when Andrew missed the free bishop around 1:20 I died
The dude he's playing is not 600 ELO, he played more like a beginner.
Andrew Tate pulled out Queen early risking losing on development, I would've mated him easy.
He won cuz the other guy (black) was playing really bad..
he likely played like this because he understood his opponent wouldn’t play the best moves
@@evanhager4266 no hes just not as good as yall think he is, the people whove never played chess in their lives just overhype him when in reality hes just an early intermediete
600 elo is a complete beginner, so idk what you're on about
@@lyric5922 I would say intermediate to advanced, if he is like 1800 as he said I wouldn't call him an early intermediate
but certainly not an expert by any stretch, so you're on point with the overhyping part
My favorite moments in chess are when your opponent realizes their queen is trapped and then spends 15 seconds thinking for the first time.
You are supposed to use the same one hand to move and press clock.
How dare you tell that the former chess champion lol
Tate is such a lying jk
@@mitternachtsplausch9559 rent free🤣
@@willrobbins2550 is that the only thing yall say when mad?
@@OpposingFork go play your little video game kid
@@willrobbins2550 At least i can afford one videogame boomer
0:57 1.Ng6 wins exchange. If 1...Qe8 2.Bf7! (2...Qxf7 3.Ne5+ wins the Queen)
I would not call that a blunder. Queen was more, like, trapped, and Tate was too lenient with prophylactic moves.
In chess, a blunder is considered anything that worsens your position in a significant way regardless of the difficulty in spotting it.
when your queen gets trapped, that means you blundered bro
that was painful queen gambit game to watch
wow that’s a classic botez gambit
bro after seeing this game I can confidently say I can beat Andrew Tate at chess
Bro this game doesn't mean anything, I usually don't think at all when playing against low rated opponents and mistakes happen but I eventually win, I'm 1700 and I think tate is around this level based of his other games.
@@Ahmed.4411 u can beat him I think hes around 15-1600 . But his mistakes can easily be punished
@@Ahmed.4411u wanna vs. I’m a 890
@@d4air105No way he is 1500-1600. He is likely a 1200.
He’s gotta be above that, I’m at 1200, and don’t think I could beat the dude whose dad was an IM that taught him chess
3:50 dude is distracted and doesn't realize that his pawn was taken and his bishop attacked.
No way the dude hes playing is 600 elo
That's what I was thinking. Can't believe nobody in the comments picked up on that. He probably claimed 600 thinking he would surprise him.
@@robertkington2084 the opponent had an accuracy off 43.5 which is super low. he is definitely 600 or lower
That stranger is not a 600
Did bro really try to steal the Rolex there at the end?!? 😅
Yeah right wtf
Bro forget that he doesn't even have hair
he could win free pawn like 3 times
The point is to get a check and later a checkmate - not to take the pieces
@@Spamacjxjc you can win a game of chess without any checks and just get checkmate. It’s not like the count up the points at the end “now you got 9 checks so that’s 9 points I got checkmate so that’s 5 you win!”
@@Spamacjxjc You don't know chess 💀
@@Spamacjxjc this guy is out of his mind😂 so i guess i just waste all of my pieces trying to get check and not taking them😂
@@xLynxxx better to end off w/ one pawn and a checkmate than all your pieces and being checkmated
At 1:12 Tate missed that he could’ve played Bb6 with check, if the other guy took the bishop with his king, Tate could’ve won the queen for free, if he retreated to a dark square Tate could’ve added pressure to taking his queen creating a battery with the bishop and creating a mating net. Honestly this entire game made them both look like 500 elo, just lots of missed tactics, overextended pawns on both sides etc
He accepted the queens gambit bruh
Nothing wrong with accepting the queens gambit. You just have to know what to do after. Petrosian beat Kasparov in a QGA
@@BREAKoceantate played the gambit wrong, he should have brought his queen to f3 attacking a weak square instead developing his knight on f3
Tate just missed the easiest checkmates in history
This is a game of 2 1000's
Worse than that tbh
You're not supposed to accept the queen's gambit for starters
That's a 500 move.
Hey isn't that the guy who dance in public in tiktok. He knows how to place chess for sure.
I was hoping Andrew would catch the bishop e6 when he moved his queen over, but I guess he wanted queens on the board.
What do you mean he wanted queens on the board?If he played that he would win a queen for a bishop! What is there to think about? He just didn't see it and a few moves later he trapped his own queen
King D8? Then he can trade the queens and win a bishop. He isn’t winning a queen for a bishop, just a bishop.
@@light-water What do you mean just a bishop?If you play it like that and you trade queens and you win a bishop its a HUGE lead! It's not about keeping queens on the board it's about getting closer to an endgame where you are a bishop up and a fcked up king...no one would ever be like oh i dont want a free bishop because i dont wanna trade queens there! He just didn't see it.
Andew Tate makes me angry when he plays😂
as a 721 elo player I can definitely say I can take both of them at once in a game of chess. my worst blunders have never been this bad.
Lol Tate will wipe the floor with you. His actual rating is closer to 1600 or 1700 blitz. One game doesn't mean shit.
@@sebastiankong1979 Tate simp.
Under 800 you could lose by accident to people just taught the rules
@@sebastiankong1979 do you even play chess?? Delulu
There are basic 'rules' (always exceptions, of course) but one of them is; your queen should not be your furthest forward piece - you are asking for trouble. You are inviting your opponent to attack it, whilst developing their own pieces, and all you're doing is moving your queen around... You're welcome :)
Tate missed Be6+ when he played Qe8. It picks up a bishop
Andrew almost withdrew the handshake with a disappointed look, but eventually got it and gave him a wink lol
Both dont know how to play chess...
I advise everyone to try learn the game of chess, its a game of complete accountability. If you lose its because at some point you made a mistake there is no luck in chess at all its the purest form of competition.
Any tips for someone new? Where can I start and get good teaching?
0:57 why wouldn't you play Ng6 there?!?! That traps the opponents rook. Instead retreats the knight back to f3?!?! 😂 😂 Yah Andrew tate is not much stronger than his opponent anyway.
I'm sorry, but there is no way black is even 600 Elo. He made nothing but pawn moves for so long. Looks more like 200 Elo tbh. As someone who is around 600 Elo, I've never had an opponent that didn't understand to focus on developing their pieces in the opening. This is more like someone who just learned how the pieces move.
This dudes not a 600. I’m a 900 and not even 900s play like this. This dudes playing like 11 or 1200
he had an accuracy of 43.5 thats definitely 600 elo
Andrew got his Queen trapped 4 moves ago when he didn't move it to h3, (white square, baiting his opponent to brake dark square pawn position allowing him options to clean house). How someone who's stayed at a consistent ~1800 elo doesn't see that I don't get, considering I just started learning chess seriously and I saw that immediately.
Looks like tate is probably 1000-1200 fide at best
I thought I'm the only one with that assumption. A lot of comments here ranging him from 1500-1700
1200-1500
99% certain he just wanted to disrespect the queen as a joke.
99 percent sure he is just bad at chess and lies to his fans to make them believe he is good
If the opponent is 600 elo then im for sure a "GRANDMASTER"
I'm currently at 600 ELO and you see huge blunders from time to time. I'm also _SO_ tired of everyone trying to go for Scholar's mate. Hopefully will be out of this rathole in a few weeks.
@@j00flmao im like 200 elo and because normally i get paired with people who are as bad as me I always go for a variation of scholars mate and it works 30% of the time
@@j00f same bro im also 600 but play 1000s in tournaments and won a few. all because they play real chess and not some line that should never work
500 ELO is a complete beginner, so no you'd only need to have a peanut for a brain to beat a 600
@@haydopotatoe637Most people under a 1000 elo aren't actually at that level.
Andrew Tate missed a bishop sac to either win the queen or if he moves back you take the queen he takes back and then you just win a bishop for free
Naw I won’t judge Andrew here. I’ve blundered like crazy against lower-rated players too (due to me not being as careful, as I’m sure was the case with him as well).
Happens to the best of us
he didn't actually blunder his queen, it was gonna be trapper anyway after qg3 before the check
@@Toksick7 if ur queen is gonna be trapped, then u did, in fact, blunder ur queen...
It's not just 1 move though. There's a lot. Unless he's doing it intentionally
@@gameothers2022 I'm a 1400-rated player. I've noticed that I play my worst games against 800s-1000s, because they're at the level where they can capitalize when you make a huge blunder, but you don't take them seriously enough to concentrate on the game. Andrew likely thought he had the game in the bank, and since lower-rated players play very unorthodoxly, and you can't be bothered to really think against them, you play stupid moves. I'm pretty sure that's what happened to Andrew here, because there's no way an 1800 rated player regularly plays like that
@@gameothers2022Notice how when Andrew blundered, and thought he might actually lose, the quality of his moves rose drastically
Although he was up a Queen, he lost his castling rights (which puts his King in danger) & was yet to develop his Bishop, Queen or Rooks.
1:20 should’ve played Bishop to E2
Be3+ yes. And before that Ng3 instead of retreating.
@@kareandersson Be6*
I have a question, I don't know much about chess but couldn't tate win at 0:15 / 4:48 if he moved his queen to a4 ? i'm just trying to learn
No black can defend with pawn to c6, queen to d7 or bishop to c6
and if the player is new and does none of that ?@@bobo-tp9gb
@@bobo-tp9gb Kicking the queen and winning a tempo.
No one is talking about how the board is setup wrong
its not
@@peffle6999 look at White's fucking peices
Mira, i already seen how he was going to end em with the quickness
Love the 800s in the chat saying “he is no where near 1700 he blundered a lot” when they would get their queen forked 4 turns in against a decent player
Well yeah that's the point. 800s blunder a lot so Tate is probably closer to that elo
Key word "against a decent player" when he isn't playing a decent player lmao
there was a really nice tactic at 1:17
bf6+ wins a bishop?
Be6+ wins the Queen
@@robinkok8006 Ke8?
@@robinkok8006 Sorry I mean Kd8
Be6+ wins the bishop on c8
1. Be6+ Kd8
2. Qxe8+ Kxe8
3. Bxc8
+5.0 on engine
4:44 that handshake with the hand sliding was kinda un-hetero.
Ok Mr testosterone😂
@@Drgiggletouch99 actually i have 50x more testosterone than average men. i consider myself trans, but in the other direction (non-femme -> uber-man)
@@psychologienerd7546 axtually
I would love to see Andrew go against Magnus
Tate would get absolutely smashed
andrew could’ve easily checkmate him at 3:12 if he moved his d5 pawn down
There's no d5 pawn
Explain
True
how?
His queen is under attack.
"It doesn't matter whether you win by an inch or a mile, winning is winning."
His chess skills are similar to his justice evasion skills
he did nun wrong free bro
Ignorance is bliss
You mean corruption evasion?
@@itscnvulsins5384 what he do convulsions
You sound like such a nerd
Tate is by no means a good chess player. He's not even titled.
I like the part where he almost loses
He is down a queen in 3:29 (you can see the chart on the right, which shows that white are in completely losing position.
@@wisdomofmasculinity yeah still clickbait as fuck when u consider that andrew is way better than him and won with checkmate like that
@@noahbrandt2959 In a normal chess game when you are down with a pawn the best you can fight for is a draw. When you are -6 points the chances to make a victory versus normal chess player are negative.
@@noahbrandt2959 So many videos you could call clickbait and you still make a false claim lmao
@@wisdomofmasculinity is he a normal chess player or does he play someone with 600 ELO🤡🤡
He came back after a queen blunder, that's pretty impressive 😄
Did Andrew play bad this game?
If you want to escape the slavery and conquer your freedom join
Andrew's university: therealworldmember.com
What slavery we don't live in the 1800's
@@gbdpro9350you are a slave to the men in suits my friend.
@@gbdpro9350 🤣😂
psychological
@@gbdpro9350
Andrew Tate is a very weak chess player..😮
Obviously he doesn’t understand the game
Sure. He lost. Just the queen.
600 guy is playing exactly how I would doing some goofy sh-t moving my king around like he's discovering new foreign (albeit dangerous) lands. Respect. One should evoke the spirit of Alexander The Great when he plays and not give a single F about where he goes.
i was just watching that watch during the hand shake looool
I'm currently 586 and I saw that queen getting stuck at least 4 moves before tate did lmao.
He was going for queen sacrifice, hes hard to read wow
Really hh?
At 1:24 he missed Be6+ forcing Kd8 followed by Qxe8+ followed by Kxe8 followed by Bxc8 🤦♂️🤦♂️
Ok u just set incorrect timing
Andrew tate actually told not to give up even when you have blundered the queen
Its like Nick Cannon and rap. Like 50 said, I don't understand why he's so passionate about it. He sucks.
That 600 elo knew his Queen traps. He setup 2 big traps. 600 me eye.
I don't like the guy but we all blunder sometimes. You can usually get away with a lot when the opposing player is lower rated. So, no, I don't think he was losing just because his position was much worse after he blundered with the queen.
Its obvious he doesnt understand the game. Its embarrassing to watch.
no, if your position is worse that means you're losing
@@pushupkid4203 The position may be objectively losing but that doesn't mean you are going to lose the game. Top-rated players often play objectively bad openings on streams or make funky moves or even give up some of their pieces just to have some fun. Their position would be losing against other top-rated players but that does not mean mediocre or even very good players are actually good enough to capitalize on these mistakes, which is why they're doing it. If Usain Bolt gave me a lead start in a race, that does not mean I'll win the race even he's objectively losing at the beginning.
@@bogdanbarbu363 I agree, I was just talking about the position itself
Y'all need to chill every one has bad days
No way his opponent is a 600
Thats exactly what i was thinking bs
@@jumboopizza255 he had an accuracy of 45.3 what r u yapping about
Bro is lost in matrix
If that guy is 600 elo I’m Hikaru. Dude why would you even consider raising your F pawn.
He Sacrificed the queen to mate 600 elo 😂
he didnt sac, he blundered. hes shit lmao
there were so many unorthodox moves.... it was painful to the eyes
Be6 was a better move instead of Qb8
correct me if im wrong but does he miss Bf7 at 1:19?
Be6+
Realizing his queen is trapped 😂
That dude against tate is at least 1100 btw
Fun fact, he said "İ play 3 minutes blitz at 1800s elo"
Andrew was clearly not trying to outright beat him and wanted to make it in interesting game. That’s why he played how he did
That's a cope
@@dantealighieri2821 they give him a lot of benefit of doubt
I just can’t see him being 1,700 rated, I’m around 1,400 and I don’t feel I’d have much issue with either of these players.. my dad on the other hand he’s not a trained player just super smart and great at the game. He’d smoke em
Barf, that was like 600 level play.