Crysis Remastered PS4/Pro/Xbox One/One X Review: The Good, The Bad & The Broken
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- There's a ton of potential in the console versions of Crysis Remastered - but it looks like the delay to the game should have been longer. In this video, John assesses every console running every mode and sees some remarkable difference between the Switch release and its PS4/Xbox One siblings.
Thanks to Omen for sponsoring our channel. Watch Omen Underground Presents Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 1+2 Tournament from the PAX Arena here: bit.ly/2ZYE0eH
Subscribe for more Digital Foundry: bit.ly/DFSubscribe
Join the DF Patreon to support the team more directly and to get access to everything we do via pristine quality downloads: bit.ly/3jEGjvx
Want some DF-branded tee-shirts, mugs, hoodies or pullovers? Check out our store: bit.ly/2BqRTt0
John taking the reins here, as Alex is still sobbing uncontrollably at his shrine.
lool so true. This "Remaster" might have broken Alex
It will be John's turn for the Bethesda acquisition reaction
He's still recovering in the DFICU.
@@DigitalFoundry Will you cover Serious Sam 4?
Can it run Crisis 2020.... yes...my eyes and brain wants a word with me though.
Digital Foundry has the only guy on youtube that has figured out to uncloak before shooting and not lose all energy
Nah bro, I am too I swear lol
though I'm only on RUclips as a technicality. Nobody watches my boring streams (at least they're 1440p tho)
@@HugoStiglitz88 Don't be so hard on yourself. If you believe your content is boring, that is how it will be perceived by others. Thoughts become things.
These type of comments make me love this community
I'm very sure that the others never played Quake 3 Arena or Unreal Tournament with bots on godlike difficulty.
This has been infuriating to me for years, nobody on RUclips seems to uncloak and go to armor or strengh before shooting.
Uncloak, shoot with silencer, cloak again before anyone sees you ... Rince and repeat.
I wished Crytek remade the original pc version in their new engine. Not this frankenstein console port.
You mean a Crysis remake, not a remaster.
I should have known it was based on the Xbox 360/ps3 version. It says so in the title.
@@Unprotected1232 no, I think he means a Source Port of the PC assets in their newest engine not this crappy PS3 port
One entire level is still missing from this.
Yea this seems like a hack job with terrible QA. The PC port still not being multithreaded and the performance issues on consoles make this a very disappointing release. Seriously, the 31 FPS issues is "surprisingly difficult to pin down"? I can toggle half refresh v-sync in any game on PC, it's really not that complicated. If it IS actually that hard to pin down, it just speaks to how terrible the code base is that they're working from and makes these devs look like a bunch of clowns.
People wouldn't pay.
You know, Alex and John get a big chunk of respect for being brutally honest about this - even after having been invited to visit Crytek.
Big chunk of respect for doing their job? It would be very bad if they WEREN'T honest about this
@@gammat8248 Fair point. I just spend most of my life steeped in political journalism, and it's pretty shocking to see anyone biting the hand that feeds them. That literally never happens.
I think John did hold back a litle
He did not mentioned or show any of the terrible problems the game had before patch
Image problems everywhere!
It was almost umplayable .. you had to reset the game in differente graphic options many time so the imagem can be " normal". Besides many more glitchs
@@felipemachado7976 I mean, it got patched. Those problems (I suppose) were mostly fixed.
Ronald Flump compare them to - say - Geoff Keighley and it’s night and day
"It's a lot of different cryses!" well that's 2020, baby!
Identity Crysis
Maybe our president (for fellow us citizens) should recognize that and do something about it instead of just claiming 2020 is cursed.
Can't spell Crysis without cry
@Jan Brady August 2020. Lol
@@worm6820 "Your president" has his orders from higher up the same as every other president (caesar) before him, dialectics run the world, you hire strangers to look after your family, you'll get a world of 'do as we say, not as we do'
In some scenes it actually looks like people who did Switch port gave enough of a shit to make colors bit closer to original PC version.
Just another reason to buy the best hand-held console of all time
@@CarsonCote fps is rough
Yeah the art direction for the switch looks like closest to the PC.
@@funkyneto colors are way more appealing on the switch, some colors seem washed out on the Xbox
Michael Moores It does, but it’s actually the most impressive of all the 2020 versions.
Take a shot every time john says I talked to Crytek about this issue
also he needs to retire the word "then"
@@Fastrap87 the word "bespoke" as well... lol smh
*drunk 😭💀
WTF are you trying to kill me?
I vaguely remember taking a swig of beer everytime he said talked to Crytek; I just woke up in hospital
This goes to show that it's not the tools themselves that make a game look great ( raytraced lighting, shadows, reflections etc ), it's the way those tools are used by the artists. The xBox version maybe technically superior, but the Switch version uses it's limited tool set with more creativity. It seems more visually balanced.
Even i don't trust Nintendo's own remasters from the Zelda series and remakes, i always prefer the originals because limited tech also gives each game unique visual art.
He said the xbox version was. Running very poorly before patch and after patch...
It looks awful on Switch lol . Still glad more get to play such a wonderful game though all the same but hopefully it gets upgraded for the Switch pro.
Not true. You and John are ignoring the fact that HDR can be turned off. When HDR is off, it looks similar but much better than Switch artistically. All the color, grass, and lighting issues on PS4/Xbone disappear when you shut off HDR.
@@saricubra2867ay your wrong seventh gen games have very diffrent graphics except wii games
The thing is, if they actually did a solid job with the remaster, then the PC and Console versions should look outright, unquestionably better than the Switch version. The fact it's even a question is evidence they've dropped the ball.
The fact I think that 2007 crysis looks better is another evidence they've dropped the ball xD
I'd say they look unquestionably better than the switch version.
I agree with Alex. No ides what you’re on about. The console versions look much better than the Switch version. There’s no contest.
@@ThisBirdHasFlown I do like the green tint on the switch more. And at 13:30 I do think the switch has a better snow texture :)
@@ThisBirdHasFlown The point is there are plenty of people who don't. The fact that it's not universally agreed upon is the issue. Your individual experience is irrelevant. Oh, and get ratioed
I also find funny we now have 4 completely different versions of Crysis
1) OG PC DirectX10 version
2) CryEngine 3 port on X360/PS3
3) Switch version of the CryEngine 3 version from X360/PS3, but with SVOGI
4) The new PC/X1/PS4 versions, with a much better implementation of SVOGI, RT and different water rendering
I'm here wondering ... WHY are there so many versions. And ironically, the biggest issue with Crysis, the poor multithreaded CPU scaling (which WAS FIXED in Crysis 3) is still bleh in the Remaster
They're trying to catch up with Skyrim!
Honestly I was scratching my head when they decided to go with a remaster rather than a remake.. I feel it would've been a great opportunity for them to rebuild the game from the ground up using elusively next gen features to give a new generation a "can it run Crysis" moment. But ultimately their goal was to make money so a remaster makes more sense in that lens.
@@mocoj7423 money
@@blitzwing1 You're absolutely spot on. The Switch version looks surprisingly good especially on the small screen (I have the lite version), despite the lower quality settings. They destroyed the og art direction with these new remasters on PC/XBOX/PS4.
If Crytek truly cared for there flagship game, they would have handled the port themselves. Making a new port from the original source code & converting asset to the newer engine to use. This is truly unacceptable for such a high tier and well respected developer. This is a messy of a port of port.
I thought they learn about Saber Interactive track record. I guess not :/
Deliveredmean42 yeah, very hit and miss.
'high tier'? Maybe ten years ago, but they haven't made anything noteworthy in awhile. I know hunt showdown exists, but its reach is limited and has its fsir share of issues. But even if you regard it highly, ryse crysis 3 and warface are definitive steps down from their previous work. Also they're massively struggling financially, not to excuse the port. I do agree they should've handled it themselves, it seems very obvious but they might be a reason unbeknownst to me.
fair* there*, spelling on mobile is impossible :)
@@AJ-pc9gu their is correct bro :P
It’s interesting, I like the color palette of the Switch version better. Obviously the graphics are another story but the Golden-green look on switch is interesting
So it's a shit storm on consoles in the same way it is on PC. Turns out we were right that one week wasn't enough to make these remasters work better.
The PC version is great just did my playthrough on my channel, loved it 4k60FPS just turn RTX off! Most settings on high and very high !! great game on PC!
Crytek year 2039: We are very excited to announce that Crysis Remaster is coming for the PS9 Professional & Xbox One Series 360 X running at 20K resolution
Later that week the game releases looking like a bad PS3/360 port running at 10fps
John from Digital Foundry: I have mentioned the issue to Crytek
@Fried Puddycat Gamer yeah what the hell is Crytek doing these days?
A Kel Hunt Showdown I guess
I love that Xbox console name, probably Microsoft will steal it from you.
@@akel135 Well one thing is for sure, they aren't doing their own remasters.
Umm, ps9 isn't coming out until 2078
Wow, I actually prefer the lighting indoors on Switch to Xbox One X... damn. That's strange.
I was thinking the same thing
Reminds me of Halo 2 anniversary vs original. Anniversary is obviously much more technically advanced, but the original graphics are so much more pleasant and lend themselves better to the actual gameplay by making it easier to tell what's going on.
I felt similar seeing this comparison between Switch and Xbox One. Between this and Witcher 3 the Switch team at Saber is really flexing their muscles with that console.
@@AriaLaurel I feel you. It's a good comparison, actually. I prefer to play Halo and Halo 2 with the original graphics on the Master Chief Collection. The remasters are obviously technically superior, but from an artistic standpoint, neither really *feel* like Halo - to me.
@@ubernaffa Its funny to think Saber Interactive did both of those remasters which also have their own problems. Halo 2 definitely looks closer to style of the OG game on XBox, to a degree, unlike Halo Anniversary being a complete mess in art direction.
It's because the HDR is broken
The colors look so much better on switch lol
Exactly like, why didn’t the developers notice this and make it the same? Why did they also over saturate the remaster, don’t they know that colors with more grey look photorealistic?
They made it way to bright lol
No they don't it has HDR on Xbox one X and that never looks right unless you are viewing it on a HDR display. I thought the Switch colours looked basic and lacking.
@@DEVILTAZ35 In my experience, HDR is an awful feature, maybe its better on higher quality tv's, but for the mid price ones its not good.
Only if HDR is enabled. They look IDENTICAL if not better if HDR is disabled.
The Switch version holds up very nicely
Lololol ye if you're stevie wonder
Sure, for what it is and it's running on. If you play it handheld it looks absolutely wonderful considering that most mid-range phones in 2020 have more powerful hardware in them than the Switch. Nice and crispy, the screen is small with a low native resolution which the game matches. Problems aren't as noticeable because of the low res and screen size. The one area where it truly kicks the ps4 and Xboxes asses is it's color palette, which looks like the original (much better than the newer versions imho). In docked mode on a large TV though it looks very blurry and poor all around, like most 3rd party Switch ports in docked mode. It's not the ideal version unless you only want to play "on the go". There is no ideal version really, they all have drawbacks. The original PC version (modded of course) is probably the closest you can get to the best Crysis experience. It just still doesn't perform as well as it should given it's age and visuals.
@@jokerzwild00 idk, i think crysis on switch looks decent on a smaller 1080p display. definitely much better than last gen
This does make the Switch version look mighty impressive when you consider that Switch is less powerful than the base Xbox.
Watching this makes me appreciate just how much Saber Interactive kicked absolute ass with the Switch version of the game.
“I mentioned the issue to Crytek”.....says John ever so casually. I am waiting for Ubisoft to resolve server issues for a month now .
I don't know why these Studios release these games in such appalling states. It just destroys the excitement for the game, and destroys the Studio's reputation. I won't be buying this game now, and will be suspicious of Crytek in future, always waiting on trusted reviews before touching any of their products.
you should be suspicious of sabre interactive, not crytek. Their work on Halo MCC pc port leaves a lot to be desired as well. Cryteks own Hunt the showdowns is in a great state however.
@@wixxzblu Sabre is doing good with MCC now but they are hit or miss.
@@wixxzblu saber interactive only did the switch version though...
@@TonyJenn no, they also made the other console ports, John says it in this video. The thing is, its a different office within saber interactive, still saber interactive though.
Wixxzblu crytek still gives the final say when it comes to releasing the game. Crysis is their baby and deserves way better than this
20:35 wow
Looks like something from Minecraft
Mutahar laugh
@@tangytangerine Minecraft DLC confirmed.
Crytek e laf edemezsin
Kinda weird omen wanted this particular video to include their ad roll considering its console focused.
Noice...
Hey Nick 👋
Xbox has mouse and keyboard support
@@UchuuYumemi ah that is true - good point. Keep forgetting that's a more common option nowadays
Love your content man keep it coming
"Playstation 4 Professional" the way it's meant to be said. I salute you Sir!
Except it’s called the PS4 Pro, not the PS4 Professional, so I have no idea why you would whether people pronounce the whole word or not when even the official title doesn’t.
@crazy dutch1 oh ok, so you mean to demean ps4 by calling it thrash. Now that was a really mature and funny joke.
@@ThisBirdHasFlown its a joke mate
AndrewZ451 no it's not
No foliage movement from explosions, and slow animations on foliage, NO BUY. This was a HUGE mistake remastering the 360\ps3 version of the game. This is NOT Crysis
These two facts are an epic fail by Crytek
Honestly I just often thought that the original version looks better and has a lot more performance. So yeah, no thank you. Gonna buy Mafia 1 Remake on Friday instead of this.
Somehow, the switch version reminds me a lot of the original PC version. The smoke effect of the dead guy getting disintegrated looks exactly like the original, and that was changed in the remaster. Even the more washed-out look of everything reminds me of the PC version.
i know you hear the word white-wash a lot(too much), but in this context, "washed/washed out" already means what you want to say.
@@MaxIronsThird I knew it sounded odd. Washed-out is what I meant.
Just shut off HDR bro. If you want it to look just like the switch version/PC OG, just shut off HDR. HDR is busted in this game.
Honestly, I think the Switch version is overall the best version of Crysis Remastered.
if you are drunk sure.
It's a very solid port but it still has some problems which hopefully will be fixed with patches.
@@DEVILTAZ35 😂
I do think it’s fixable
I do think it’s fixable
I do think it’s fixable
I do think it’s fixable
It’s as if John thinks repeating this mantra will will it into existence
at least hes bringing it to the attention of crytek. these dudes are the best
Amen
I mean.. he already did will a patch into existence, it might happen again.
This is so bad that’s laughable. Switch version is the only one of these “remasters” that worth only for the novelty of having crysis on the go.
The fact the switch can run this, it's weaker then phones now bruh how are rtx 2070s struggling at 1080p🤣
The Switch version is rather good, actually - really enjoyed playing it and it looks much better than I’d have expected. The other 2020 releases are very disappointing though for sure.
@@christopher.costner it's called optimisation.....
Git gud.
vexyxero
Switch is using a worse Global Ilumination and runs on 720p on docked and looks blurry possibly because they used TAA. There is also a lot of pop in in the switch version but even with all these issues
Of course it looks worse in places that eg. Xbox One X. It would be shocking if it didn’t, given the power difference! But it is much closer than you would expect for such an underpowered machine: an impressive port and extremely playable.
I find the lack of consistency across the different studios astounding. The Switch has a much better colour palette overall. The console remaster is so disappointing!
Are you viewing it with the HDR lighting though? You can't view it on a non HDR feed or it doesn't look anywhere near as good. The colours are awesome on XBox one X in the flesh. Can
't wait for series X updated patch.
I'm watching it on an LG B9 in HDR. The blue hue does nothing for me. I find the console and PC presentation overly vibrant and saturated.
I love how the Switch version handles exposure in a photographic sense. Especially how bright outdoors are blown out when observed from much darker indoors. Is it because the XBOX footage was captured in HDR?
At around 17:00, what screams to me, throughout this project, is that "too many cooks spoil the broth". Someone asking someone else to fix an issue that someone else created? Ouch!
It's weird how the color grading, light angles/placement and even some textures are a lot closer to the original release. The remaster on the other platforms basicly looks like Far Cry 1 or 3 in terms of colors.
Far Cry 2 was baller af tho
Switch colour grading etc look appears best to me (no I don't own a Switch).
I absolutely agree and I only have PC and ps4. The other versions of the "remaster" just don't look like Crysis. Also although distant objects are low resolution and aliased, the attempts to cover that up with a slight blur and fog makes the atmosphere on the switch seem more realistic. Seriously the only good versions are the 2007 PC and the switch if you want a mobile version.
GrandmasterofWin the grass on switch also looks better and doesn’t stick out with a darker shade like the other consoles
the tech is obviously worse on Switch, yet the art direction really looks better.
Switch's grass looks cartoonish to me, like Zelda.
turbotrup96 i still think it’s better. Matches the rest of the grass
Switch sometimes even looks better..
Yeah. When it becomes a cup holder or paper weight.
It looks like they used more of the original PC version as reference there instead of the downgraded crap on 360. You can see a lot of effect in the switch version that are missing in the ONEX version like the icing of the visor or the dirt on the windscreen of the car. Hell there are some shadows in the switch version where there are none in the ONEX. WTF
It seems like the Switch version is the best console version right now
@@kazoopower5841 It could have been if it wasn't running at 15 fps average during combat.
@@weaverquest nah its still good, it still mostly runs better than the xbox one x quality mode funnily enough
PS4 professional..! First time hearing that.
I like it
Usually "Pro" is short for "professional"
@@CroneRaven1810 everybody knows that.
@@XZ-III it's unusual lol, no one ever calls it that
@@XZ-III He's refering to how nobody calls the PS4 Pro the PS4 Professional...
Feels like the Switch was the lead system for this remaster LOL
A thirdparty console game for a Nintendo console looking better than the competition????
This is not the Gamecube or SNES, this is impossible.
You're probably right. I bet the switch version made them the most money.
How are you not seeing the Switch is seriously a blurry mess lol
Nope. There's nothing better about the Switch version. The problem is the HDR mode on PS4/Xbone is broken. In SDR all the negatives they have compared to Switch are null and void.
@@DEVILTAZ35 It's a switch. The fact it even runs on it is a miracle. If you're playing a game like this on the Switch then safe to say you don't care about graphical fidelity and if you do then you shouldn't be gaming on a Switch.
Crysis: ReWait for next gen Back compact
Brute force is the way once more.
These are the best videos to watch while taking a shyte
On switch lite this game plays great ... really loved it..
The Switch version got even better. They increased the resolution to 900p and enabled parallax occlusion mapping, without any loss to performance.
As a gaming community, we must stop falling for these overhyped "Remasters" aka reskins and crappy ports with downgrades. The gaming monopolies are completely out of ideas, and the newest scam is taking old, famous properties and lazily transferring some code over for a quick payday
This was never overhyped or even hyped. It was a joke since the first trailer for it.
That's not what this is. There's clearly a significant amount of work put into this. Failure to focus on performance is the failure in this case I think, remaking the game wouldn't have been feasible for them financially. It's unfortunate that some details aren't as refined from the original, but they probably made a sensible technology decision.
It's the fans that are calling for this. Not to get over analytic but I think it's a sign of the mental health of society at the moment. Many people are depressed and are stuck in the past and would prefer playing games they have fond memories of vs new experiences.
Damn this whole comment thread vaild points/facts...i hope next generation of gaming is better or aleast decent..
This gen wasn't bad but far from great like ps3/360/old school pc games
My god! Finally someone knows how to use the cloak mode properly: switching to power or armor right before shooting and then returning to cloak mode again saving the energy. And this is a channel about the tech behind the games, not the games themselves!
To be honest switch lighting looks more realistic
I agree. PC, Xbox One and PS4 versions of the remaster look like a cartoony mess. I prefer either Crysis 2007 or the Switch remaster.
Anyone else prefer the aesthetic of the Switch version? (Obviously massively lower image and asset quality aside)
Take a shot every time he says "Mind you"
John is so nice that when he says something is bad, that's saying something.
how the hell are they allowed sell these broken "remasters" It's ridiculous.
Too many just buys because memories and few seems to refund when their broken...
I think this was just a test game. Trying Ray tracing on last gen consoles.
Uh you’re allowed to sell any game you want. People don’t need to buy it though.
WEE WOO WEE WOO The Gamer Police need to look into this, it looks to be breaking several pro gamer laws. Who allowed this to happen! Someone alert the gestapo!
Because it isn't broken. Broken means you can't play it. I'm already on my second playthrough and as long as you shut off HDR, it looks incredible on my PS4 Pro and runs great too.
Sabre will also be responsible for the PS5 and Xbox Series version of the Witcher 3...
What about the PC version? Is that CDPR themselves or also Saber Interactive?
@@Shieftain are u serious?
@@chrisrichfield8906 ?? I'm asking if the enhanced PC version is by Saber or not.
@@Shieftain is there an enhanced Witcher 3 version on PC? I just figured there was only 1 PC version.
@@Shieftain oh I see now, there is a new version coming to PC, my bad
What a ridiculously awful "remaster". Do these developers not test their own game?
No. QA is outsourced to whom who buys temporary license to access the game.
I'm rather impressed by how they managed ray-tracing despite not being DX12.x
Crysis and Mafia 2 fighting each other for the title of worst remaster.
Then Silent Hill HD stumbles in and passes out.
Remember when Zone of the Enders HD came out and Konami had Hexadrive come in after the fact to fix it?
Well, they got paid by epic to have this game only on their shit store.
Crytek didn't care about making a good remaster, they just wanted the money.
@@GoldSrc_ Crytek is approved scam & spy business.
Seeing the PS4 and Xbox One versions make the Switch port hold up so much better. It's awfully close, but on a god damn tablet. Incredible work.
Never thought I'd prefer the Switch version over other consoles.
You can keep this one, Tim Sweeney.
Really shows the quality of games being kept as exclusives.
Why bother fixing the game when Tim Sweeney pays up front or is going to make up for copies you didn't sell.
Great for the consumer amirite :D
@@DatGrunt you nailed it haha
Along with his shitty launcher!
Alex's Shrine should also include an airplane for Flight sim 2020
...why
I'm kicking myself for not following John's Twitter account more closely. I bought Crysis Remastered for my Xbox One X on the day it came out, and now I can't even play it on the included modes, other than quality and performance. I had never seen ray tracing before, so when I noticed that as an option, I was very excited. I turned it on, along with HDR, and was greeted to images on the screen with the screen ghosting and the image torn into sections.
How to make a proper Remaster of Crysis: You pass it to Bluepoint or Vicarious Visions.
Take a drink every time you hear the word "bespoke."
Extremely
I now am bedead
Bespoke like a bloke
Is "bespoke" the new "pipeline"?
Digital Foundry must be having so much fun doing so many videos dedicated to Crysis
Actually it's a pain to see your favorite game torn to pieces, but still fun to play it I guess
Is it me or it’s just the color OG looks amazingly good until this day
Indeed. My theory: for the original Crysis they had specific reference photos that the game had to look like - and in the case of the remaster they were probably just told to slap on technology X and technology Y and to "make it look better".
Why in the hell did they choose that PS4/Xbox 360 version to remaster? Seriously the superior version was the PC edition and yet they went with the inferior one? I don't get it
CryEngine 3 vs CryEngine 2, they probably saved a good month or two of work not having to upgrade the PC data. I mean, the results speak for themselves but you don't think Crytek released this game for anything other than a quick buck do you?
Yeah I think CryEngine 2 was just way too difficult to upgrade and port. CryEngine 3 is the better engine and was made with ports and stability in mind.
Just sad, that the original wasn’t restored at least content wise
@@bingobongo1615 I dont see why considering the awful CPU utilization has not been touched still.
Easiest to port probably as less overall to do.
Ohh sfogy? It sounds so cute🤗im.gonna name my puppy like that
I bought this por my Ps4 pro, I have a decent 4k Hdr TV and this game is so broken, very disappointed with this one
Oh grow up and enjoy the game kid
I'm sorry for you dude... I'm sure you were looking forward to this D:
@@MorrisseyMuse you can't enjoy something that's broken
Your name is Vasco Martinez. You're a latino from a third world country. You neither have ps4 pro nor 4k HDR TV. You maybe have a PS2 with CRT TV. If you're from Spain, you might have a PS3.
Calmate amigo. It's just a joke.
@@electrikoptik Every joke holds some truth
calmate I'm joking
All of these variations make this seem like a classic DF Retro episode. Love it!
*A new video from DF pops in my feed.
Me: well, my work just has to wait now.
They did a great job remastering a version of Crysis we didn't ask for. Thanks Crytek!
lol they did a shit job remastering a version we didn't ask for. This game is an abortion. Massive disappointment.
At best its better than the original console releases. However I think I will wait for Series X to play this. Patches should improve performance and fix bugs, but still need more power for locked 60 fps.
Hopefully Crytek also has a patch to utilize new hardware.
Switch version looks so much better
I kinda like the Switch lighting tone and brightness best !
Great stuff @Digital Foundry. I sometimes think you guys are being used as an outsourced QC/QA team. Keep up the good work, you guys are doing a lot for the gaming industry and gamers.
As with Alex's PC build analysis, this games remaster NEEDS to be a ground up rebuild on the newest Cry engine or at the very least built from using the original PC build to fix the baked in issues of the x360 and ps3 port. I feel this game, and the fans deserve better.
That's a remake not a remaster you idiot lol you literally used the word REBUILD!!!! there's your problem. You want an entirely different product
@@HugoStiglitz88 I know the difference between a "remake/rebuild" and a remaster. No need to be rude. I was stating to fix the issues you need to rebuild the game from the ground up or remaster it using the original PC code to fix the x360 and ps3 ports baked in issues. I do not think this was a "quick and dirty" port of the game by any means. There was a nice amount of touches made to this remaster, but the flaws are obvious. Crytek did allocate from what Alex and John's trip may suggest a decent amount of resources to the project, but in my opinion the game absolutely should have been a compete rebuild period! You have the tech Crytek... build it right! The game and the fans do deserve it!
The lighting and coloration on switch looks the best. Looks like they based the color palette of the xbox and ps4 on farcry:instincts . Super over saturated and cartoony. Really disappointing
Switch can't even go above 30, when the new consoles come out, you'll get a locked 60fps with this game and the game is being shown through capture footage, not a properly calibrated TV in person.
@@wodensthrone5215 thats totally true, unfortunately the extra performance isn't going to change the weird artistic choices they made for the ps4 and xbox versions
Switch coloration the best???
Looks overexposed with a lazy vibrance effect with Reshade.
It's annoying seeing people saying bad things about the colors for the PC/XBOX/PS4 version when they are in fact better...
@@asheleydavies The "art direction" isn't being seen in person on a properly calibrated panel, you're going by capture footage.
I can blow this game up on my Q8FN and it'll look spectacular.
@@saricubra2867 why so defensive dude?
I still hate that fact that they use the 360/PS3 ports for the remaster, when they should have tried using the original PC port more.
You called it the "Professional" which is something I always do but have never heard anyone else do. You're a great man, John.
The flipkick interlude: gj editor, I laughed.
It’s weird, I think the Switch version looks better in terms of lighting
I've noticed that those color flashes seem to be the voxel grids around objects used for the SVOGI in Ray-Tracing mode. I found that switching back and forth between modes, loading and reloading the level as you change it, seems to remedy the problem temporarily for the remainder of your session.
I still don't understand why they didn't remake multiplayer, if you're remastering the game, you might as well go all the way! That, and the missing level editor :(
This a remaster from the 360/Ps3 port. Ascension Mission and multiplayer is not in it unfortunatly
Because its not a remake of the original but the crapy 360 version.
Missing Power Struggle is the real struggle, man
besides low resolution and lower effects, I think the Switch version looks artistically better. The lighting and the colors are much more appealing on Switch
While its technically inferior. Seeying this, I prefer the artistic perspective running on the Switch port. I feel it more "like Crysis"
Its weird that the Switch look closer to the original art direction compare to the most powerful consoles and PC. Its really really weird.
If you prefer the art of the Switch version, just shut off HDR.
I actually like the visual style of the Switch version more than that of the other consoles, even though it may be less technically impressive.
So the best version is still the original PC version.
So they managed to fail two times trying to make a console port 😂
Sadly yes. Crytek has no idea how to make a Crysis game anymore. In a way even the new PC version is worse than the original. Makes me sad...
Nintendo Switch version artistically looks far better than the remaster and much closer to the original game's art.
I just wasn't fond of its stiff control movement
i think the switch port is from the nvidia shield version they released a couple of years back. (with switch basically having the interior of the shield tablet)
It is nice to see the amazing effort placed towards this remaster on all versions. It is also surprising to see an RT setting in the top consoles. This is especially impressive when you consider how weak the Jaguar cores really are, which are complete garbage compared to the Ryzen cores available in Xbox Series and PS5.
I wished they talked about if there was change in the enemy AI. It really looks horrible in all the videos I’ve seen of the remaster.
try an SSD
20:35 Minecraft with ray tracing
I love how he casually says that he contacted Crytek and they told him that problems would be fixed in a patch in a few days.
DF: PS4 Pofessional
Mom! Digital Foundry is being weird!
*I don't like the lighting and tone of the console version. It looks less photoreal than the original*
the tonemapping is super flat and doesn't allow any blown out highlights
that tree made my day. at its own pace
To think, that Switch is competing with XbX in some ways. Overly bright sky aside, the warmer colors on Switch looks much nicer.
Considering the hardware, its almost as if the Switch is second best version of Crysis after the original 2007 release.
Broken game lol they took the "Can it run Crysis" BS too seriously.
So.... is it John's fault that the one x version is running awful? Just asking for a friend.
I just finished it on X it runs fine just not in performance mode :)
Seemed to be performing a lot better before John talked to Crytek so... I guess.
Please do comparison of "Kirby Star Allies" and "Kirby Fighters 2", since the former is 30FPS and the latter is 60FPS, and the latter seems like a rehashed version of the former.
Why didn't they do this?
If you play this on consoles, be sure to use the performance mode.
Even though this video says to use ray tracing on both platforms ?
Raytracing or not, i HATE the lighting in this remastered, everything is waaaaaaay to bright and washed out! The colors are terrible. (Base PS4)
The Switch version is much brighter and washed looking. The other version actually look super saturated.
Nice try, but even the PC remaster is trash. There is only one Crysis.
True. I bought the PC version and compared it directly to the original which I bought way back on release in 2007. I really love the textures in the Remaster and the global illumination and subtle ray tracing. However, the controls are busted. You can customize most controls, but for some reason even changing tbe keybind for 'V' to turn it into the suit mode selection wheel, away from melee by default, it just won't change. For some reason I can't reassign that specific keybind. It's weird. So controls are the biggest let-down, followed by the lackluster CPU usage. Hoping for future patches
I've been playing mostly at 1440p High settings with RTX 2070 and i7 9750H
@@aaz1992 the cpu usage is the biggest let down with the remaster. That was the biggest issue with the original that I was hoping they fix with the remaster....
Wrong. The original PC version is SHIT compared to the PS4 Pro version. Okay, maybe it's not shit but I have many issues with the PC original even ignoring performance.
Problems OG PC :
-ONLY HAS TOGGLE for aiming down sights. That is completely unacceptable. I seriously cannot stand it and it makes the game so much harder to get immersed into/lost in because it's so unlike every other FPS on the market.
-OG PC needs separate controls for crouching and prone. I HATE THAT. Especially when playing with a gamepad but eitherway, being able to tap for crouch, hold for prone IS MUCH BETTER. Remastered lets you do that, OG PC DOES NOT
- Hot take but I have good justifications - THE OLD SUIT CONTROLS SUCK. With the old controls you CANNOT SUPER JUMP WHILE CLOAKED. That is completely unacceptable for me, as I super jump while cloaked constantly. It is massively helpful when trying to be stealthy
You can't super jump while sprinting either. Yes, you lose the faster walking of speed mode, and weapon sway in strength, but those 2 things are no where near as valuable as cloak jumping on it's own, nevermind sprint jumping, and sprint punching
-OG PC has really stupid button mapping, though that is obviously fixable with Input Mapper or Steam's controller settings (check out my preset if you're a southpaw)
-OG PC doesn't have trophies. I got the platinum trophy on PS3 for this game. I will also get the platinum on PS4. I've played this game 13 times now. Therefore I'm better than you and my opinion is more correct than yours. LOL jk, but seriously, I have my reasons for LOVING the PS4 Pro version over the PC original.
OG PC does win by having manual saves though, NGL.
Also, PS4 Pro looks better and runs better than OG PC version vanilla
The switch is using the base pc version in 2007.
I was waiting for this! Thanks John!
No problem mate