This is completely false I’ve searched through multiple sources, including Wikipedia, there’s no data on how much Abrams X were produced for testing And it’s impractical, first of all, you don’t need 453 units to test a tank, second of all, the Abrams X is a demonstrator M1 Abrams tank made by General Dynamics Land Systems, it is not yet accepted into the military, thus, mass producting it is completely useless Third of all, supported by the two reasons mentioned beforehand, producing over 453 units of MBT, especially the most advanced MBT of the world would cost an enormous amount of money to produce, over 1 billion dollars. And remember, this project has not been accepted intto the military yet so the government will not fund it right now and General Dynamics Land Systems definitely doesn’t have enough money to fund it also.
It’s a 12 year old guys. The Abram’s has a 30mm cannon which can shred smaller targets and, ai targeting systems, advanced shells,and can carry six American switchblade drones. T-14’s are being destroyed by simple commercial drones with RPG’s strapped to them while switchblade loitering munitions are a lot better.
@@MEISCOSMIC нет , т14 именно сломался ,в нём отсутствует куча систем и по сути это только оболочка которая не едет и которую производить не будут так как от него отказались
@@BalZreak You were cooking originally with the Abrams X but then you burnt the house down when you said that the T-14 Armata is better than the Abrams X
The T-14 armata is not the first Russian MBT that has a 3 crew capsule in the front,the honor goes to T-195 and the AbramsX is also not the first,the M1 TTB is.
Not true. Recently came out again under the M1-E3 Abrams and is said to fully replace the M1 series by 2030. Not abandoned, just has not been fully announced to the public.
@@FürDeustchlandAlthough the tank will probably lack much of the tech "promised" for the Abraham's X since it isn't really viable to invest in tanks today as before unless they find a way to properly deal with drones.
@Aaronreacher yeah drones are a major problem in warfare. They are anti everything but we don't have much defense against them. But I'm sure in the future some sort of proximity defense or something would be fitted onto tanks to make them more useful.
Man that's a whole lot of cope. Hey broski, how about you find a video of the T-14 with an actual stabilized gun. I'll give you a few hints on a stabilized gun: 1) Gun is not flopping around like fish after shot. 2) Gun shoots target with tank doing more than 12kph and not on a flat gravel path... 3) Camera view of turret spinning is *not* a sped up shot of the tank crawling at 12kph and spinning the turret like it's in a ballet. (Psst: T-14 is Trash and will probably never see service outside of the parade unit.)
@@SouksavanThavonesouk well Ig but don't forget russia is using tanks from like before the cold war, in Ukraine and they are getting their cheeks handed to them. (By Rebels)
@@SouksavanThavonesouk First I still want to remind you about the AX about being a prototype but also russia made a fake tank to appear like it had a strong tank to compete other MBTs
@@Pitatt0 T-14 Exists... As a tech demonstrator. (Russians keep claiming it's in production, and we can verify the existence of 2-3 dozen tanks within their parade unit) But it's not even showing up in May 9 VD parades anymore. Rostec says it's delivering 125mm versions and that it's in service...but qualified that it won't replace T-90 nor will it show up in Ukraine. So even were that true- does it really exist?
@@Pitatt0 Definitely fake news. Even Rostec says it's not seen frontline service. (Wherever you saw that, just go ahead and unfollow and ignore them, they're not even trying for quality propaganda.)
@@Jinxtul o tanque mal foi criado e já tem que ir pra guerra o t14 foi criado em dois mil e quinze e só foi pra guerra agora o abrams x foi apresentado recentemente
@@Jinxtulvc não sabem nem falar as vantagens do t14 armata como o canhão 125mm mais longo do que o do t90m e o canhão do abrams x é 120mm enquanto o do t14 armata é 125mm maior alcance e penetração vantagens do abrams x é o armamento secundário anti drones 30mm e pode ser equipado com dois ATGM anti aéreo e a mobilidade do abrams x é melhor pra compensar o t14 armata poder se equipado com um canhão principal de 152mm mais eu acho que até 155mm qualquer tanque pode ser equipado com um canhão principal de 155mm
Abrams X is better, but its a prototype so they can choose what they want from it on their current tanks, maybe they will use it later in 2031 tho, and it has no camo because its a prototype. (T14 is still a beast)
@@ZentumoEven though 5,000 were destroyed, it still makes Russia produce its own weapons and not beg the democratic oil thieves who claim that their weapons are the best even though the facts on the ground say that Western junk doesn't belong here🤫
@@Zentumotoo fawning over the US as if the east side is a source of criminals to the point of being blind to the fact that the US is a land robber of native American tribes. Now I ask, if Russia has traditional clothes, what other traditional clothes does the US have besides Superman clothes?😂
Two abandoned tanks:
The T14 was created in the amount of 12 pieces, while the Abrams X was created in the amount of 453 pieces
453 Abrams X ? 😂😂😂 There is only one and always only one Abrams X
@@Xernobyl-u9n you should check Wikipedia before writing nonsense
@@Xernobyl-u9n Abrams X was produced in more than 453 units for testing
@@elonmusk2915 ur the one who spouting nonsense here? Which Wikipedia is it? Abrams X will not operated till 2030 atleast
This is completely false
I’ve searched through multiple sources, including Wikipedia, there’s no data on how much Abrams X were produced for testing
And it’s impractical, first of all, you don’t need 453 units to test a tank, second of all, the Abrams X is a demonstrator M1 Abrams tank made by General Dynamics Land Systems, it is not yet accepted into the military, thus, mass producting it is completely useless
Third of all, supported by the two reasons mentioned beforehand, producing over 453 units of MBT, especially the most advanced MBT of the world would cost an enormous amount of money to produce, over 1 billion dollars. And remember, this project has not been accepted intto the military yet so the government will not fund it right now and General Dynamics Land Systems definitely doesn’t have enough money to fund it also.
It’s a 12 year old guys. The Abram’s has a 30mm cannon which can shred smaller targets and, ai targeting systems, advanced shells,and can carry six American switchblade drones. T-14’s are being destroyed by simple commercial drones with RPG’s strapped to them while switchblade loitering munitions are a lot better.
Der T14 armate wurde aus einem alten deutschen motor gebaut
We can't really rate something we haven't been able to see how it performs yet.
Of course, it's very smart to send tanks that were never captured to be reverse engineered to be shot down by a $1500 drone.
We not gonna talk about how none will reach battle bc one was a prototype and the other breaks down before it can go reach the battle.
It doesn't break down, the Driver Accidentally Pulled An Emergency Brake
@ i don’t think any kind of brake causes engine smoke.
T 14 is a reality - it can drive and shoot, and Abrams X is just a prototype
Yeah it didn't broke down it was just a rookie driving it and he didn't know that he pulled the emergency break
Correct me if I'm right
@@MEISCOSMIC нет , т14 именно сломался ,в нём отсутствует куча систем и по сути это только оболочка которая не едет и которую производить не будут так как от него отказались
т14 не существует больше, от него отказались потому что дорогой и отстойный
@@nikitagordey8286 мамкин эксперт
Never cook again 😭🙏
No im a chef😎
@@BalZreak You were cooking originally with the Abrams X but then you burnt the house down when you said that the T-14 Armata is better than the Abrams X
@@TheArsonist10True things hurt American feelings (not all american some actually acknowledge their defeat)
@@graphite8842hmm who has won the past 2 WORLD WARS HUH? The US, we’ve lost one war in total, nam
@@BalZreak nah your way worse than chef pp
Iq ... TANKS HAVE BRAINS?
The T-14 armata is not the first Russian MBT that has a 3 crew capsule in the front,the honor goes to T-195 and the AbramsX is also not the first,the M1 TTB is.
The ussr actually had a 3 man capsle before the americans
@DrLivesey1988 только у ссср это кусок металлолома с гробом внутри
The abrams x is a abandoned prototype
Not true. Recently came out again under the M1-E3 Abrams and is said to fully replace the M1 series by 2030. Not abandoned, just has not been fully announced to the public.
@@FürDeustchlandAlthough the tank will probably lack much of the tech "promised" for the Abraham's X since it isn't really viable to invest in tanks today as before unless they find a way to properly deal with drones.
@Aaronreacher yeah drones are a major problem in warfare. They are anti everything but we don't have much defense against them. But I'm sure in the future some sort of proximity defense or something would be fitted onto tanks to make them more useful.
@@Aaronreacher abrams x имеет защиту от дронов
@FürDeustchlandWhy didn't they send it into Ukraine?
Man that's a whole lot of cope.
Hey broski, how about you find a video of the T-14 with an actual stabilized gun.
I'll give you a few hints on a stabilized gun:
1) Gun is not flopping around like fish after shot.
2) Gun shoots target with tank doing more than 12kph and not on a flat gravel path...
3) Camera view of turret spinning is *not* a sped up shot of the tank crawling at 12kph and spinning the turret like it's in a ballet.
(Psst: T-14 is Trash and will probably never see service outside of the parade unit.)
Just look at the guys pfp 🤦
I love the abx
it's actually Abram x stronger than T14 but I'm still with russia
Bruh both are good
Fr
Bro let him cook 💀💀💀💀💀 iq battle 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Russian tanks are statistically worse however ax is still a prototype
In your opinion
@@SouksavanThavonesouk well Ig but don't forget russia is using tanks from like before the cold war, in Ukraine and they are getting their cheeks handed to them. (By Rebels)
@@FishybusyBusiness Depends on people
@@SouksavanThavonesouk First I still want to remind you about the AX about being a prototype but also russia made a fake tank to appear like it had a strong tank to compete other MBTs
@@FishybusyBusiness So?
Abrams X doesnt even really exist rn
It's just a tech demonstrator.
(Same as the T-14, even if RMoD doesn't want to admit it...)
@Livewyr7 t14 exists, but for example pl 01 doesnt exist either
@@Pitatt0 T-14 Exists...
As a tech demonstrator. (Russians keep claiming it's in production, and we can verify the existence of 2-3 dozen tanks within their parade unit) But it's not even showing up in May 9 VD parades anymore.
Rostec says it's delivering 125mm versions and that it's in service...but qualified that it won't replace T-90 nor will it show up in Ukraine.
So even were that true- does it really exist?
@@Livewyr7 then i think i heard fake news about a T14 armata destroying a M1 Abrams in ukraine, i should check my sources more
@@Pitatt0 Definitely fake news.
Even Rostec says it's not seen frontline service. (Wherever you saw that, just go ahead and unfollow and ignore them, they're not even trying for quality propaganda.)
T14💪
Como sempre o t-14 armata na frente😏
Looking at ur profile pic I can already tell why u make this type of post (no hate btw)
Abrams X better u are showing hate
Abrams x2 vs T14 not win
little kids shouldn't make videos on anything military. You make them based on bias instead of facts or your own research.
Fact since we don't see any Abrams X operated in field
@@Jinxtul o tanque mal foi criado e já tem que ir pra guerra o t14 foi criado em dois mil e quinze e só foi pra guerra agora o abrams x foi apresentado recentemente
@@Jinxtulvc não sabem nem falar as vantagens do t14 armata como o canhão 125mm mais longo do que o do t90m e o canhão do abrams x é 120mm enquanto o do t14 armata é 125mm maior alcance e penetração vantagens do abrams x é o armamento secundário anti drones 30mm e pode ser equipado com dois ATGM anti aéreo e a mobilidade do abrams x é melhor pra compensar o t14 armata poder se equipado com um canhão principal de 152mm mais eu acho que até 155mm qualquer tanque pode ser equipado com um canhão principal de 155mm
@@Jinxtul
Abrams X is a tech demo...
T-14 claims to be in service, but it seems only in service to the parade ground unit.
The T-14 is a weak excuse for a comparison to the abrams x did u forget to take ur meds?
One of them rely on computer
One of the agents doesn't
Well the t 14 does have the better camo in these pictures everything else the abrams is better at
The Abrams X doesn't exist, T14 exists in service
у арматы пробитие 1300
Арматы не существует это прототип который стоит за 1 штуку 30 миллионов рублей
@elonmusk2915 армата есть, их более 100 штук
@@Irk77 смеешся? посмотри википедию и узнаешь сколько их штук
@elonmusk2915 аа нет, это контракт на более чем на 100 штук, всего их ±30
@@Irk77 в свою очередь абрамс х был выпущен в количестве более 830 штук
???
Abrams x é melhor
Abrams X is better, but its a prototype so they can choose what they want from it on their current tanks, maybe they will use it later in 2031 tho, and it has no camo because its a prototype. (T14 is still a beast)
Nah
Why not?@@ภูมิณฤทธิ์ด้วงคง
Kommibo
Russian propaganda
Abrams it's more good
Russian fanboy detected
US fanboy detected
@@graphite8842 yeah while majority of the Russian tank got blown up just by a cheap 5000 usd Drone
@@Zentumochallengers and abrams also were visibly ‘DESTROYED’ using the same drones, haven’t you seen that?
@@ZentumoEven though 5,000 were destroyed, it still makes Russia produce its own weapons and not beg the democratic oil thieves who claim that their weapons are the best even though the facts on the ground say that Western junk doesn't belong here🤫
@@Zentumotoo fawning over the US as if the east side is a source of criminals to the point of being blind to the fact that the US is a land robber of native American tribes. Now I ask, if Russia has traditional clothes, what other traditional clothes does the US have besides Superman clothes?😂