M1 Abrams Vs. T-14 Armata Tank: Who Wins?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
- Both the M1 Abram and T-14 Armata are highly capable tanks, but they possess different strengths and weaknesses. The M1 Abrams has proven technical superiority in mobility and cross-country performance and has been in service for over 40 years. The T-14 Armata, on the other hand, has superiority in crew protection and survivability, better armor protection with unmanned turret, larger main gun, advanced electronics suite,and more futuristic design compared to M1 Abrams. However, the T-14 is a relatively new design with several issues and had not yet been adopted by the Russian army as of 2022, with its future uncertain due to technical difficulties and funding constraints.
Chapters:
00:00 Introducing
01:14 History both tanks
03:10 Comparison
03:22 Armor
04:23 Weapons
05:30 Mobility
06:30 Electronics
07:30 Engine
08:25 Design
09:13 Vote comparison
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @usmilitarypowerr
============================================
❤️ Subscribe Our Channel to Update More Videos everyday: / @usmilitarypowerr
❤️ Our Social Media:
☛ Pinterest: / usmilitarypower
❤️ US Military Power now available on Google Play Store: play.google.com/store/apps/de... 
Наука
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
Russians: We will build a tank the World has never seen .....
And so they did
even though you saw he video of it in training???
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍🤜
Your comment demands to be pinned
😂😅😀😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣
You forgot the Trophy system on M1 Abrams.
There are well over 10 000 Abrams tanks in the world. As for the T-14 there are only 8 visually confirmed.
You drank the T-14 Kool-Aid. All those capabilities have to be true and function for a true comparison.
But the T-14 Armata's turret spins around really, really fast :D
Jesus I'm going to watch lazerpig now grab some popcorn and wait for sephiroth music to start
still forgot to say that "Armara" has an invisible mode, so no one saw them and is unlikely to ever see on the battlefield😂
Conversation between Putin and his general.
''how are things over there'' ''everything is on fire, but everything is fine''.
The M1 Abrams and M1A2 Abrams are strong, reliable, and tested tanks which have been produced and used in large numbers for over 20 years. The T-14 is a cool looking tank shown in parades, never widely used in combat. I think the good old Abrams wins this one easily.
What T-14 Armata? It's just a tank good for parades and fantasy world of Russia. No battle experience yet!
денег нет для тренеровки и прокачки армата
Abrams showed very good experience yes on Iraqi and Afghanistan slipper boys with AKs they were never in combat against equal combat tank so this experience means nothing ;)
And secondly maybe you are brainwashed with western media T-14s are already in the battlefield in Ukraine and they are doing pretty good job. Have a nice day ;)
@@mariuslapadovski8753 т14 не равный, а низший. его еще нет, и он в единственном экземпляре в любой момент заглохнет.
Quale T-14 ??? ancora in fase di prova😂
Great report, did Armata manufacturers offer the technical information?
Atmata are just a joke of cartoon, made just for propaganda! and it will be for another 10-15 years, before they scrap it completely and start just continues modifying their t-90 instead. the only thing that seemed to fascinate them in this video was that they could swing the turrets so fast while driving straight ahead😅
Do you think General Dynamics offered technical information for this?
@@Alayuthe joke was that there are no manufacturers left of the 14 dude they shut down
Just my view! Abram is a great tank. T-80 A Great tank. So is the Black Panther. But lets be real. A Striker with a 120 Smooth bore gun is just as affected as any Tank. Far as speed terrane and cost. Modern Tech is a plus. But with all Military equipment. Planes Helicopters Tanks even Ships. The Crew is what matters. A Great Crew in a M60 Patten up against a Green crew in a Abrams . It matters greatly. Like in WW2. The King Tiger and Tiger 1 were awesome tanks. But I'll never understand why Germany didn't redesign the Turret on a Panther 3 to hold a 88. 3 panther 3 could be built for every 1 Tiger 1. Only way we will ever know what the best is is when they meet on a battlefield. Just my view. Shalom
great post...
The video avoids stating the top speed of the T14 and says it’s better and faster in challenging terrain. Well it’s actually just plain faster because the T14 can go up to 55mph…
If the T14 Armada is so great, then how come they are not in Ukraine in mass in 2023?! Russia, doing what it does best, crossing it's borders and invading it's neighbors, should be sending waves of their amazing new tanks, but instead are sending WW2 tanks! Perhaps the T14's are so stealthy that no one can see them, even the Russians!
Russia wants to get rid of their old tanks but they want them to also be useful.Russia sent a lot of old weapons in ukraine to get rid of them along with unexperienced convicts to fight
What are you saying? If Russians would use FULL force as Americans did on Iraq where they didnt care about casualties KIEV wouldnt exist as a city today you understand that? And Armata is on battlefield since last year already while you are sending billions of dollars to Ukraine and they cant beat mercenaries in Artemovsk 50.000 of them, secondly half of equipment that you sent to Ukraine is DESTROYED including the famous Patriot who didnt last a week in Ukraine. Do you really think that Russians will put all eggs in one basket? Where is so famous counteroffensive? USA said Ukraine have all necessary weapons that they possibly could get and yet they are finding excuses for date. Please lets be real until October there will be no Ukrainian fit to fight against Russians the sooner Volodimir the puppet of Biden and Macron realises that and signs peace treaty the more lives he will save. Secondly SINCE 2014 NOBODY cares about Russians get killed in Donbass region NOBODY daily kids are killed with HIMARS and Western Howitzers WHO CARES? So please stick your Ukraine in your ass i am sure it will fit really nice.
@@rueurjej6100 I agree with you, but along with old tanks Russia is getting rid of their soldiers too.
@@rueurjej6100Russia sends old equipment not to get rid of, but because it is the only technique they have, there is no other
You guys who put this video together need to correct the identity of the old, venerable M60 Tank, which was known as the M60 Patton, not the M60 "patent".
T14 a parade tank, which even broke down at a parade. It's a joke
it is true
Abrams is a reliable and powerful tank. Tested in battle. Armata is a trough for parades, they are even afraid to send it to Ukraine so as not to be embarrassed.
It is only worth something on paper. but in fact junk.
Great video
Thanks!
This comparison is laughable.
No active protection system?
Rafael's Trophy Active Protection system has been available since 2011.
Unmanned turret?
Strykers have had the M1128 Mobile Gun System since 2005. That was 18 years ago. If it had been impressive then it would have been at the top of the list for an M1 upgrade. It is much easier to add a turret on top of the hull than to put a larger bathtub inside the hull but even that has been done such as the transition from M48 with 90mm to M60 with 105mm guns. There is no such plan in place.
Larger gun?
No. Even though the Russian 125mm has a larger bore, the muzzle energy is the same, about 1.2 megajoules. This is true of both the German 55 caliber and the American 44 caliber variant.
Secondly, the German Panther II prototype has a larger, 130mm gun. Again this upgrade would be similar to M60 upgrade, but there is no plan for such an upgrade.
Higher power to weight ratio?
This is ridiculous. Although the Armata theoretically has the same 1,500 HP as the M1, this is not true in reality. The M1's engine has been reasonably reliable since the A1 upgrade. In contrast, the Armata uses the A-85-3 X16 diesel that has been pushed beyond its limits, giving it both high maintenance and poor reliability. It is even less reliable than the obsolete GTD-1250 turbine engine used in the T-80. There is no room inside the engine bay to use the reliable V-92S2F V12 diesel from the T-90 so the only option for that much horsepower within the engine bay would be a gasoline engine which they can't use because of logistics. Without a redesign for a different engine, it's a complete failure.
More advanced electronics?
In what drug induced fantasy? The electronics that the Armata would need are western and it can't get them due to sanctions. Again, these are western electronics and so are quite available to the US. Due to sanctions, Russia has reverted back to a 40-year old night vision system which it can build internally. However, this system is so outdated that consumer grade systems in the west are actually better to say nothing of military grade systems.
And it's actually worse than that. Every existing Armata was hand-built. There is no assembly line. Why? Because Russia can't build the tooling domestically. So, Russia would have to get the tooling from the west but hasn't been able to because of the sanctions. Currently it is short about 200 suppliers. And, again, this is western tooling which is available to the US. But even if by some miracle Trump became president tomorrow with a Republican majority in both houses and not only got the sanctions lifted but was able to give support to Russia, nothing would change. This is because Russia's tank factories are currently running at capacity building new T-72 and T-90 tanks while trying to refurbish the older T-62 tanks. There aren't enough extra skilled workers to set up a whole new assembly line.
This was little more than a fluff piece for the T-14.
Now I would like to see the sources of this information 😂
@@user-mo1de2ic4l So, what you are saying is that you are too lazy to do your own research. I'd be happy to have you counter anything I said.
The T-14 has the highest armor penetration round due to the length of the tungsten dart and these are the only rounds comparably to western depleted uranium. They don't work on any other Russian tank because they are too long to fit in the auto-loader. They do work in the T-14 because it stacks the rounds horizontally instead of vertically due to the external turret. Is this important? Probably not because tank on tank battles are as rare in Ukraine as battleship to battleship engagements were in WWII.
@@scientiouswell if He asked you to give him sources it means he did it for a reason no? The reason might be in my opinion that all the information that you have given is nowhere to be found online 😂
@@bracciodiferro1401
Lol, are you joking? Nothing I mentioned came from classified or sensitive sources. All of it can be found online.
@@scientious cant find it lol
LoL so much bull crap propaganda about the Russian tank and you out right lied about the M1 not having reactive armor didn’t mention the armor type or thickness, and the fact that Russia can’t put out enough of those medium tanks to matter.
Время покажет, кто что может.Потом не удивляйтесь.
as a himars driver in Ukraine I can say that the armata will burn out immediately
Открою страшную тайну, любой танк горит)))
@@user-gy7di3wr9gtrue but let me share another secret the 14hasnt seen ANY combat lol
How do you clear a misfire in an unmanned turret, also what engine is powering the T14, go watch Lazer Pig.
Armata should be compared with Abrams X
T14 is BEST TANK IN THIS GALAXY!
The armada tank doesn’t have a depleted uranium round the the Abraham M1 A2 has an since the armada is half the weigh of the Abraham tank has the armada doesn’t stand a chance
it has - old soviet «Свине́ц» back from 1985, but not really widely spread in the "modern" Russian army
Remote operated turret eh? That should reduce the amount of Russians in space after a turret gets hit and launches its crew into orbit.
The Russian army has ordered hundereds of T-14s, not a single one has been delivered. Russia is not capable of producing them. Yes, it has been adopted by the Russian Army.
False 158 have been built 100 pre production test units an 58 production units with the goal of 50 to 100 per year there is already a company of t14 in Ukraine now in combat with videos nato sanctions have failed this is reason anuff if 5 packages didn't work 10 didn't either so sad how gullible ppl in the west are sheep
Россия производит Армату , но пока не так много, но наращивает проихводство.У России есть т-90м , пусть Абрамс сначала потягается с ним.
@@user-rv3pz1bz8f Russia is total PROPAGANDA and no substance. Russia is a JOKE.
@@user-rv3pz1bz8f T-14 ARMATA - Russian GARBAGE !
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
T _ 14 ARMATA ( MBT) 💪🔥💪🔥
Well you got the fire part right
He who shot first
T 14 armata vs abrahamx
The M1 has squashed Russia's dramata and Russia only has a few left.
When it comes to war both sides will face the same problem. The old men cause the war but the young men will die first. It would be better to let the old men in the frontline and let the young men behind because sooner or latter the old men will die but the young men still got long lives to go.
Not even close, the U.S. is represented by people who genuinely uphold & remain true to the U.S. Constitution whereas in russia... what constitution?!?
@samthomas9389 those elected have been subverting the constitution since at least 1942, as it was the last time warwas declared. Anything under "warpowers" or other acts are illegal and violate the constitution. Your potato of a president got 82 million votes, more than any before? Lol]!
And how's that working out for Russia right now, I will take M1 Abrams and the highly shilled crew, American crew, and no jack in the box turret.
M1
Танк Т-14 Армата хуже в отличие от М1А2 Абрамс потому, что :
1) Армата всего 30 шт., а Абрамов - несколько тасяч.
2)Армата в несколько раз дороже Абрамса.
3) Арматы собирт в ручную, а Абрамсы-на конвейере.
4)У Арматы нет своего завода, а у Абрамса-есть.
5) Армата-очень "сырой" и не освоенный танк, в отличие от Абрамса.
6)Приборы набдения Арматы легко повредить даже крупнокалиберным пулемётов, а у Абрамса этих дурацких и ненужных камер нет.
Это только несколько причин, почему Армата хуже Абрамса. Кому инчересно-ютуб-канал Сергея Ауслендера. Он израильский военный эксперт (там более адекватное сравнение). А Армата-очередной проект бункерного для распил и скрепа для ватников.
Yes👏the only thing that seemed to fascinate the Russian in this video was that they could swing the turrets around so fast while driving straight ahead😅 and Armata are just coming to be a prototype for propaganda the next 10-15 years, before they scrap the entire Armata project and continue upgrading the T-90. if Russia can't conjure up money, this Armata prospects is doomed .
Абрамсы не производят. Их только восстанавливают из подбитых или списанных и модернизируют. И не такой уж он и хороший-в Сирии и Ираке пробивались самыми старыми ракетами РПГ-7 и очень хорошо горели. Он больше распиарен. Также на нём броня и боеприпасы из обедненного урана, из-за этого у танкистов с возрастом появляется онкология и видимо в связи с этим на Абрамсах чаще всего служат негры, они как были в Штатах биомусором так и остались. Также двигатель очень прожорливый. Все мировые производители танков стараются установить экономичные дизельные двигатели. А у штатов видимо не было своего дизельного двигателя большой мощности. И Украине не видать Абрамсов, потому что армия России сделает ему ещё одну антирекламу.
@@user-xu7vf6so4f Conversation between Putin and his general.
''how are things over there'' ''everything is on fire, but everything is fine''.
@@noticiasucrania2023 bruh, she has been watching some junk propaganda from russian news, I hope the translation did good for you, but as I understand russian, she gave so much false information regarding M1 abrams and its history of improvement, moreover, she became racist calling black people n word and saying that they are a biojunk. What a weird woman.
Wonder what the Ukraine Military thinks of the T-14?
We are not going to organize a boxing match between Mohammed Ali and Mike Tyson as teenagers!😅😅😅.
Armata has just completed its prototype period, we have no idea. But we know the M1 Abrams well... An MBT, with a helicopter engine that requires more than two hours of maintenance by highly trained technicians to maintain it for an hour on the battlefield, which generates excessive heat to be easily detected, which weighs 65 tons to get stuck in front of the bridges...🤭😡
I don't even understand how the Americans can make such a choice... Suppose this tank was designed for war in heavily urbanized areas like West Germany, but an MBT at some point have to cross the muddy fields. Even with a good power-to-weight ratio they will remain immobilized in the middle of nowhere.
Contrary to popular belief, the German Tiger was a very bad tank. It was not an MBT but a WC... “walking castle" or "water-closet" according to your choice. Why did they copy it?
Hollywood forever
No question, ABRAMS WILL WIN.
even a t72b3 enough aginst abrams.
@@makoado6010 Hahahaha Hahahaha Hahahaha Hahahah !! 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
@@wicked1172 the regular basic t72 with compisite armor have 420mm thicness. the l55 cannon have this penetraton around 800m. but the b3 have contact5 what provide 1500mm frontal thicness. and the russian 125mm cannon have baout 200fps higher velocity and shoot a hevier projectile. at 2km range able to penetra 420mm armor what is armor thickes of leo2a4. and about 800m range able to penetrate the abrams from front. and aslo have better sensors and more advanced electronics than abrmas.
@@makoado6010 How many rusting t-72 litter the Iraqi desert, all killed by Abrams?
Abrams will stuck in mud.
So far we haven’t seen any Armata’s on the battlefield in Ukraine- so it’s still a wishlist item for the Russian military. All of the sophisticated electronics need western microchips to function and those are difficult to come by these days for Mr. Putin and his criminal gang. So it appears the Abram’s and the German Leopard tanks soon to be in the hands of Ukrainian soldiers who will begin picking off the Vintage Russian T-72 tanks like shooting beer cans with a .22 rifle. 💪🇺🇦!!!
Just Look at you, virtue signaling western propaganda pathetic. 🤡
Сейчас основной танк России - Т90М. Это очень современный танк, который изготавливают тысячи штук в год.
Вроде 72
Т 90 М УЖЕ СТАРЫЙ ТАНК ЕЛИ ЧТО ЕГО НАДО БЫЛО СНИМАТЬ ЕЩЕ В НАЧАЛЕ 2000 ГОДОВ А НА СМЕНУ ЕМУ АРМАТ Т 14 И ОРМАТА УЖЕ СТАРЫЙ ЕСЛИ ЧТО НА И ОНИ ОБА ТАНКА ЧТО АБРОМС СТАРЬЕ ЧТО АРМАТА СТАРОЕ
@@demkad3629 Шутка? Т-90М это один из самых современных в мире. Там только телега от Т-90, а вся электроника новая. Сейчас и Т-72 модернизируют, ставят современные теплаки, системы наведения и остальное.
@@prosto_tsar АГА ВЫ ЕЩЕ МОДЕРНЕЗИРУЙТЕ Т 34 ТОГДА ВООБЩЕ АНАЛОГОВ НЕ БУДИТ В МИРЕ НЕ У КОГО ЭТО ФАКТ ИЛИ Т 20 ЭТО ВООБЩЕ БУДИТ ШИК ТАНК Т 90 И Т90 М ЭТО УЖЕ СТАРЬЕ ЧТО ОДНО ЧТО ДРУГОЕ ЕГО НАДО БЫЛО СПИСВАТЬ В КОНЦЕ 1999 2000 ГОДА А НА СМЕНУ ЕГО АРМАТУ СТАВИТЬ ЭТО ФАКТ И СЕЙЧАС БЫ АРМАТА БЫЛ УЖЕ СТАРЫЙ ТАНК ХОТЯ ОН ПО СУТИ И ЕСТЬ СТАРЫЙ ТАНК ЕСЛИ ЧТО
@@demkad3629 Тётя, вы идите борщ варите. Не нужно рассуждать о том, в чём вы не разбираетесь. И запятых себе купите, у вас закончились.
Which tank is better the T14 armata or the M1 Abrams is a moot point. The M1 Abrams as good as it is was never designed to face the Enemy by itself. The M1 Abrams paired with air power will be more than a match for the T14.
It doesn't need any back up ....the 14 doesn't even exist in a usable number .... Christ when Ukraine gets the 31 Abraham tanks it will have more of those then Russia has 14's😆😆😆😆😆
It appears that this tank and the overall Russian capability in Ukraine has shown the world that their tanks and other equipment is just a failure. They are not a superior force just a embarrassment to their own country.
Unsubs , you guys didnt care
T-14 Armata 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👎
The T14 is NOT an advanced tank, it's a pile of crap, with off the shelf parts. The active armour is MANUALLY activated...useless
And then the war in Ukraine came about.
The Russian army, not very effective.
Mmmm... comparing real thing with russian propaganda)) hello, prorussian chanel
T14 BEST no doubt
on paper
If careening down roads with its turret spinning around in a display of utter stupidity & uselessness, powered by a problematic, cloned Nazi-era diesel engine makes for a good tank then the T-14 Armata is a great one :D
This is not a real comparison.
Also, they compare the OLD M1 Abrams vs the brand new T-14.
There have been many many upgrades since the old MI, including the new Abrams X.
This is clearly biased propaganda.
What's going on in the Ukraine, they have proved how crappy Russian tanks are ! With American old style javelin and stinger rockets .
Well send some Leopards and Abrams than we will see how they will prove in Ukraine ;) Why are you delaying so long to send them, it is because they wont work and they wont make any difference in the battlefield. But first lets Russians warm up with Bradleys ;) have a nice day.
@@mariuslapadovski8753 everyone know that abrams is made with marvel hollywood metals and they are immortal. Just see movie fury, one tank eeeeeasy kill 1000 nazi, because america is da best
@@ivannekic1722Да конечно , лучше? Только вот 80% всей техники нацистов уничтожили русские и Берлин как известно взяли русские.
Resumindo t 14 é o melhor e pronto...
Prove it 😎
M1