T-14 Armata - Russia's Latest Tank

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 май 2024
  • When Russia first unveiled the T-14 Armata tank to the public in 2015, western militaries took note of next-generation juggernaut’s futuristic and flexible design, which was built to replace several armored ground units. The T-14 Armata has long been discussed in military circles as a contender for the best tank ever made. With state-of-the-art advancements in armor protection, crew survivability, power, communications, and so much more, it is no wonder that the T-14 caused much concern among Western analysts. However, it appears those concerns are unfounded. With little publicly confirmed data and a Russian government tight-lipped about developments, many are left wondering if these audacious claims about the Armata over the past few years are just a farce.
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 2,8 тыс.

  • @Military-TV
    @Military-TV  Год назад +73

    Why the T-72 Tank Is the Backbone of the Russian Army ruclips.net/video/kqT_6bxv3jo/видео.html

    • @benktlofgren4710
      @benktlofgren4710 Год назад +14

      The Armata is not much more than a DEMO EX 😂

    • @GedasKam
      @GedasKam Год назад

      PUTLER KAPUT !

    • @rrvillareal2011
      @rrvillareal2011 Год назад +12

      @@benktlofgren4710 like the f22.

    • @benktlofgren4710
      @benktlofgren4710 Год назад +2

      @@rrvillareal2011 Probably i got no clue, have to take your word for it :)

    • @T_81535
      @T_81535 Год назад +5

      ​@@rrvillareal2011 wrong. F22 is in service with the USAF

  • @Raffix394
    @Raffix394 Год назад +609

    It also has state of the art stealth tech. No one has ever seen one on the battlefield.

  • @BenVaserlan
    @BenVaserlan Год назад +13

    2:11 The gunner has an exit under his/her seat. Two exits are above: above commander and above driver.

  • @amirganzhuev986
    @amirganzhuev986 Год назад +20

    Те кто пишут, что в России ничего не производится для такого танка. Слушайте, в России производится всё для военной техники, процессоры для электроники министерства обороны российской федерации, никогда не производились в других странах. В России множество предприятий, производящие процессоры, они старые, 80-90.100 нанометров, но для военной техники нет необходимости в сверхмощных процессорах. Есть некоторые детали, что закупались у запада. Но жто делалось только для изучения и копирования. Вы слишком узко мыслите о России. Читайте, ищите и вникайте. Расширяйте свой кругозор, если ыам действительно интересно. После развала ссср, а это означает проигрыш в холодной войне, Россия была коллонией США. Сегодня Россия пытается это исправить и вы не вправе решать, можем ли быть независимой страной или нет. А если считаете иначе, вставайте в очередь, всех нагнем и нагибали. У нас много бывает конфликтов внутри страны, но когда враг у ворот, мы единное целое !
    Author pin the comment

    • @user-wz5cn7vv2k
      @user-wz5cn7vv2k Год назад +1

      Бред не пиши

    • @balaklawa4780
      @balaklawa4780 Год назад +5

      ​@@user-wz5cn7vv2k то-же самое кричали на западе про гиперзвуковые ракеты, мод это мультики Кремля, ха ха ха. Теперь что то не слыхать умников с Запада. Ещё эксперты утверждали что мост в Крым построить не возможно. Где эти эксперты сегодня?

    • @user-jl6vg3go2i
      @user-jl6vg3go2i Год назад

      поэтому и не лезут...могли давно бы Россию раздербанили на ресурсы...хохлов только на убой отправляют

    • @AlexElvisNess88
      @AlexElvisNess88 Год назад +1

      Ну как бы никто и не спорит, потому все и писаются примысли. что настоящая армия начнёт войну с НАТО!))

    • @user-uw7lf1hg8p
      @user-uw7lf1hg8p Год назад +2

      Чистая правда был на тком предприятии там делают процессоры и электронику для авиации истребительной, явно для танков проще. Там уже поскулили либерахи в комментах выше?

  • @KKEducates
    @KKEducates Год назад +67

    Even though, artilleries, missiles and UAVs have taken over the main battle fields, the uses and effects of tanks in the final outcome of the war can't be ignored.
    Urban warfare, too, needs tanks, despite the latest anti-tank weapons, including light portable ones.
    Specialities of the latest Russian tank, T14 Armta, is well explained.

    • @T_81535
      @T_81535 Год назад +3

      Yup

    • @russellk.bonney8534
      @russellk.bonney8534 Год назад +2

      Tanks get used last. Like fighter bomber jets.

    • @GrasshopperKelly
      @GrasshopperKelly Год назад

      Urban warfare is where MBTs suffer the most. Russia has 2 generations of dedicated IFVs designed specifically for Urban warfare. The second generation just as screwed in design, production and procurement as the T-14.
      But you're right, armour is important in Urban warfare and MBTs have proven themselves important and effective in the Russo-Ukrainian war. Mostly on the Ukrainian side. No infantry support and recon means dead tanks, as it always has.

    • @sardaukar6478
      @sardaukar6478 Год назад

      This fake...

    • @TheEeRlan
      @TheEeRlan Год назад +1

      TANK T 34 from different countries! US running engine from BMW and electronics Italy and France after the USSR asked to redo the T34 and the Americans redid everything! Since then, the modernization has been going on! That's how all the equipment of the Russian Federation is from other countries!

  • @user-vt3gs8mm7r
    @user-vt3gs8mm7r Год назад +55

    كل اسلحة الجيش الروسي 🇷🇺 أفضل واقوى تحياتي للجيش الروسي فعلاً سريع وفتاك ❤

    • @yourlocalkrieger
      @yourlocalkrieger Год назад +2

      3 day war?

    • @guest981
      @guest981 11 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@yourlocalkrieger секс должен быть долгим 😂

    • @andreir2415
      @andreir2415 11 месяцев назад +1

      Спасибо брат

    • @user-fw7sp7wd9l
      @user-fw7sp7wd9l 11 месяцев назад

      @@yourlocalkrieger да с извилинами у Вас проблемы Это уже не исправить !

    • @IvanIvanov-hv2xp
      @IvanIvanov-hv2xp 11 месяцев назад +2

      Salam Aleikum Dear Bro!!!From Russia with love.

  • @yavorkaraneshev6362
    @yavorkaraneshev6362 Год назад +348

    When I see this tank in Ukraine - that's when I'll believe it's anything more than a concept model.

    • @EGvids1
      @EGvids1 Год назад

      Who the fk cares what you believe

    • @jessiesmoak3380
      @jessiesmoak3380 Год назад +34

      they deployed to t-14 to syria

    • @nelsonortas818
      @nelsonortas818 Год назад +66

      @@jessiesmoak3380 1 tank in Syria that broke down..... hahahahahaha..... Russia should find money to feed their troops first.....

    • @ilsagutrune2372
      @ilsagutrune2372 Год назад +3

      @@jessiesmoak3380 all five of them

    • @dp-by1wg
      @dp-by1wg Год назад +10

      @@nelsonortas818 your face..... hahahahahaha.....

  • @fdkfskfkvmk441254741
    @fdkfskfkvmk441254741 Год назад +29

    It doesn't matter how well designed a tank is, if your crew is not well trained and if you don't have air superiority, the tank will be blown into pieces.

    • @neilkaippallil8390
      @neilkaippallil8390 Год назад +5

      It more highly Automatic...It does not require any Human activity to shoot down Incoming Missiles and Dynamites thrown on it ...Old Manuel & Semi-automatic games are a matter of the Past Glory..

    • @vbite2685
      @vbite2685 Год назад +2

      You dont need Air superiority if you have the best surface to air system on earth (:

    • @neilkaippallil8390
      @neilkaippallil8390 Год назад

      @@vbite2685 It is a matter of past glory....Modern Tanks are now like MatchBoxes or Sittings Ducks before Drones or Missiles......15 years back they ony faces Helicopter GunShips & Fighter planes ...now these slow Tortoises are a waste force ...
      Britian which made the 1st tank for W.war 1 , has already stopped tank making it..

    • @viktorg1316
      @viktorg1316 Год назад +1

      @@neilkaippallil8390 the t 14 is not so slow, and it's clear that the tank will not fight alone

    • @neilkaippallil8390
      @neilkaippallil8390 Год назад

      Tanks Have more Enemies in the Battle than any others....1 Opponent Tanks2 LandMines ,3 Rebel Missiles4 Drones 5 Fighter Planes,6 Apache Helicopter GunShips 7Missiles 4M Drones 8 RPG ,9 Dynamite Thrown on it.

  • @catonpillow
    @catonpillow Год назад +57

    Excellent and very informative video, keep it up!
    It's a shame that the comment section is completely compromised though.

    • @detlefbeutler625
      @detlefbeutler625 Год назад

      Der Abrahams hat im Irak mehr als genug Probleme gehabt. Anfällig im punkto Sand, schlechte Panzerung im Häuserkampf usw. Also den Ball schön flach halten.

  • @Solado
    @Solado Год назад +333

    This tank is so advanced it couldn't even make it's way down the parade without breaking down.

    • @ChristianCaseGaming
      @ChristianCaseGaming Год назад +6

      Now that's funny 😂🤣😆

    • @YTMMS-hy6mz
      @YTMMS-hy6mz Год назад +35

      it didnt break down lol the driver messed up with the clutch

    • @Solado
      @Solado Год назад +76

      @@YTMMS-hy6mz The tank is so advanced that simply using the clutch wrong causes it to break down. Got it.

    • @KashtanGreg
      @KashtanGreg Год назад +38

      it didn't break down, some inexperienced driver engaged emergency brake (parking brake), it later drove away on its own...

    • @adisproject
      @adisproject Год назад +40

      @@Solado lol, you never rode a car I guess. It didn't "break down", it stops. Also it didn't happen at a parade but at rehearsing. So much ignorance.

  • @edlee8949
    @edlee8949 Год назад +189

    Seeing how well the Russian tanks performed on the Ukrainian battlefield, one can easily draw a good prediction of how well the T-14 will perform.

    • @marcusberger7324
      @marcusberger7324 Год назад +53

      a very narrow minded answer. Never underestimate anyone, especially not those opposed to you ;o)

    • @umu8934
      @umu8934 Год назад +1

      😹😹😹😹
      Simple minded guy.... Those pesky Russian use in Ukraine are old tanks without proper upgrade and armor.... It's obviously that Putin is trying to deplete it's enemies supplies and the one who's supplying weapons.... Didn't you even realize that this is just a practice battleground for world war 3 of US government and European countries while the Europe are focus in Russia Ukraine frontline. US is preparing for China front door, sadly US is waiting for European countries to be indebt again to US funds like what bankrupt them in world war 1 and 2, it might trigger the world reset if world war 3 start soon

    • @frankquinn1296
      @frankquinn1296 Год назад +26

      @@marcusberger7324 Track record for Russia. Lets see, tell a lie a long enough, last time i seen one of these it was getting towed off the May display. You no longer have the tech to build this, unless your counting on Iran and North Korea, which will be interesting to watch since they use parts stole from western motor vehicles.

    • @Raz.v.god.i.kalash.strelyaet
      @Raz.v.god.i.kalash.strelyaet Год назад +37

      You literally didn't say any argument, you just farted in the air.

    • @ahinomas2805
      @ahinomas2805 Год назад +14

      Thats what hittler said

  • @avanildoalexandredesouza8530
    @avanildoalexandredesouza8530 Год назад +89

    A Rússia tem muita joia secreta, muito avançados...tanques, aviões, sistemas de defesa, etc...

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 Год назад +6

      How come they are not being used now? If they are so advanced.

    • @stelios_konstantinidis
      @stelios_konstantinidis Год назад

      @@martinrivera4175 γιατί τώρα κάνουν απλός μια στρατιωτική επιχείρηση δεν κάνουν κανονικό πόλεμο δοκιμάζουν τα πάντα για τον τον επερχόμενο παγκόσμιο πόλεμο που θα ακολουθήσει τα καλά και νέα όπλα τα κρατάει μυστικά για λόγους μην πέσουν σε αμερικανικά χέρια αυτή την στιγμή σπρώχνει ότι παλιό έχει από την σοβιετική εποχή εκπαιδεύει τον στρατό στην Ουκρανία η απολειες τον ουκρανουν ειναι 500 χιλιάδες η Ρώσοι έχουν απολειες 50 χιλιάδες... Πλέον αυτό που ξεκίνησε στην Ουκρανία δεν θα σταματήσει θα συνεχίσει και σε άλλες χώρες.. Καλή δύναμη

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 Год назад +2

      T-14 has to be used. Sonny or later they have

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 Год назад +6

      So secret that they don't exist. With modern technology. Nothing is a secret 😎

    • @comdir_01
      @comdir_01 Год назад +15

      @@martinrivera4175 Why use new, modern, expensive equipment against old Soviet equipment and against Western tins like the M113 or Bradley

  • @Etude888
    @Etude888 Год назад +107

    The Armata T-14 turrets are now equipped with parachutes. They fly higher. Great upgrade!

    • @Eric_W
      @Eric_W Год назад +2

      State-of-the-art!!

    • @winkus8586
      @winkus8586 Год назад

      $10,000 lancet have killed so many $4000,000 M777 howitzer

    • @jamesgarner327
      @jamesgarner327 Год назад +2

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @mosnicolae1678
      @mosnicolae1678 Год назад +3

      That's partially true, only the units deployed in Ukraine are equipped with parachutes. The others are equipped with lots of boxes containing toilet paper for the crew :)

    • @eagle_orstkho
      @eagle_orstkho Год назад +11

      Can show photos with flying Abrams turret.

  • @pr248
    @pr248 Год назад +17

    Looks interesting. Is the crew totally isolated from the turret or are they able to access the turret without getting out of the tank if there are any problems with the autoloader?

    • @joelrodriguez9661
      @joelrodriguez9661 Год назад +6

      they are completely isolated from the turret. If the autoloader goes down..The tank is out of the fight.

    • @vonSchwartzwolfe
      @vonSchwartzwolfe Год назад +2

      Being able to get into the turret from the armored crew box would weaken and even defeat the reason to have the remote turret don't you think?

    • @onerxowns2202
      @onerxowns2202 Год назад +5

      @@joelrodriguez9661.
      So what? Most of tanks be burning magma. ARMATA can just retreat and get repaired, all other tanks be destroyed or unmanned by enemy fire

    • @Kusina_at_Patalim
      @Kusina_at_Patalim Год назад +1

      I believe the turret is unmanned.

    • @kevinsage245
      @kevinsage245 Год назад +1

      I don't care, you are in armored coffin if the magazine blows the turrent off the Armata 14...
      Just saying the Shock wave...

  • @tooroptube4980
    @tooroptube4980 Год назад +14

    “War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.”
    ― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Two Towers

    • @CremeDeLaMeme.
      @CremeDeLaMeme. Год назад +1

      true. Russia defending against direct descendants of Nazis - Nato arming neo nazis and terrorists to fight Russia because they cannot survive without robbing resources from other countries, and Russia is the richest natural resource country in the world.

    • @vladimirjokanovic6462
      @vladimirjokanovic6462 Год назад +2

      One can tell right away that Tolkien spent a couple of tours in the shit with the grunts.😎

    • @joni8090
      @joni8090 Год назад

      The Greatest Weapon of ALL is: L💖ve !

    • @user-fb2rd5fv7s
      @user-fb2rd5fv7s Год назад

      Ты,что покурил сам то понял,что сказал?

  • @ChessNoobX
    @ChessNoobX Год назад +4

    I'm more interested in it's active protection system
    ..how effective is it

    • @surpriseandterror9698
      @surpriseandterror9698 Год назад

      It's so effective that no T-14 Armata has ever been destroyed in combat!
      ...
      I mean no T-14 Armata has ever been deployed in combat but

  • @ERSCAUS
    @ERSCAUS Год назад +166

    Question? Does the turret of the T-14 fly as high as the others that are currently in Ukraine?

    • @Solado
      @Solado Год назад +44

      No because they're for the propaganda parades only and not actually used in battle.

    • @Mushele
      @Mushele Год назад +22

      To do that it would need to drive all the way from deployment point to the battleline without malfunction

    • @yerayserrano141
      @yerayserrano141 Год назад +42

      the leopard`s turrets flew long before the russians in siria 🤣🤣, but i bet u wont tell that don t you?

    • @PabLo-yr1zw
      @PabLo-yr1zw Год назад +6

      factoring in the corruption that goes along the assembly of a T-14, the simple answer would be- YES!

    • @Solado
      @Solado Год назад +21

      ​@@yerayserrano141 Yeah in 2016, They did tell us that because we don't have propaganda machines. Don't worry, when you get conscripted you can see how well they work when you're in a ditch somewhere.

  • @patrickcronin6829
    @patrickcronin6829 Год назад +42

    Oooo! I heard that it is the most powerful tank that has ever existed…. They didn’t mention the stealth invisibility mode… That’s why nobody has seen them in combat…
    If the Russians are ever brave enough to bring them to Ukraine, we’ll get to see if farm tractors can tow them effectively…

    • @kyalokamina6497
      @kyalokamina6497 Год назад +5

      The British Challengers, German Leopards and American Abrams are inferior to the Armarta T-14

    • @patrickcronin6829
      @patrickcronin6829 Год назад +9

      @@kyalokamina6497 will they all square off in Ukraine? Nope. Armada won’t be sent. It’s a paper tiger, and everyone knows it. Meow…

    • @leopardontheboat8252
      @leopardontheboat8252 Год назад

      @@patrickcronin6829 it’s still in development and there not much tanks still

    • @shuathe2nd
      @shuathe2nd Год назад

      @@kyalokamina6497 ok fanboy, but maybe you want to see different tanks in action before firing off you assertions. Challenger, leopard and Abrams have all seen combat so are at least reasonably know quantities, and we have all seen how russian tanks have done in Ukraine so far, which isn't great. the T-14 will not be in Ukraine, for as many have pointed out, it isn't in production, so is actually just an advanced development, and so not operational. In Ukraine it will rest more on the AFV's being sent such as Bradly and CV90 that will change the course more than the tanks.

    • @gryph01
      @gryph01 Год назад

      @@kyalokamina6497 We would like to put that statement to the test...

  • @BenVaserlan
    @BenVaserlan Год назад +5

    Combat weight (with ammo) is 55,000 KGs. (Update: 55 metric tonnes)

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 Год назад +2

      So?.. what's that mean?

    • @BenVaserlan
      @BenVaserlan Год назад

      @@martinrivera4175 55 metric tonnes.

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 Год назад

      @@BenVaserlan it's a tank.. it's built for battle. Nothing else!!

  • @marcusaetius9309
    @marcusaetius9309 Год назад +28

    Apparently still not in production in any numbers. The production focus is on the T-90 which is also excellent.

    • @matthewhuszarik4173
      @matthewhuszarik4173 Год назад +16

      Yes we have seen how excellent the T-90s are in Ukraine. The turrets go very high.

    • @vitsobotka6268
      @vitsobotka6268 Год назад

      excellent? The T-90 is a disastrous piece of shit that never should ve been built, and those arent my words, those are the words of the chief designer

    • @shuathe2nd
      @shuathe2nd Год назад +3

      We're about to find out how the T90 compares to western tanks - I would prefer to be in the Challenger I think, than the russian coffin turret tossing champion.

    • @vitsobotka6268
      @vitsobotka6268 Год назад +5

      @@shuathe2nd we dont have to... T-90 is essentially a T-72, and T-72s have fared poorly in every single encounter with western MBTs

    • @marcusaetius9309
      @marcusaetius9309 Год назад +4

      @@shuathe2nd
      Indeed, because we all know that even if the Challenger is out numbered 10 to 1, facing dominant air and artillery power and is operated by a crew with absolute minimal training it will still be victorious in the end!
      Here’s your unicorns 🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄

  • @rbs1997
    @rbs1997 Год назад +28

    As with any military hardware, it's not only about how sophisticated it is (and we certainly have our doubts about credibility of info Russia provides), but most importantly ability to mass produce that hardware, production and supply of spare parts and also training of operating and maintainance crews, things that are quite hard to achieve in wartime and with poor economy. US has developed Abrams X and UK has its plans for Challenger 3, but due to factors mentioned above, they are simply technology demonstrating concepts at this moment in time, until fielded in mass numbers.

    • @user-ps1uh3me6z
      @user-ps1uh3me6z Год назад +8

      Вас не смущает, что в США последний корпус танка построен в 1996?

    • @rbs1997
      @rbs1997 Год назад +1

      @@user-ps1uh3me6z Смущает. А еще больше смущает факт что с тех пор, за 27 лет, страны-соперники так и не смогли произвести что то сопоставимое в достаточных количествах. Еще смущает то что такие страны как Южная Корея и Япония обладают производственной базой для современной тяжелой техники, а Россия всё больше эту способность теряет.

    • @leovang3425
      @leovang3425 Год назад

      ​@@user-ps1uh3me6z not really, the US doesn't need anymore tanks and modernizing the current M1s would be more useful.

    • @user-mz5hu1cs6s
      @user-mz5hu1cs6s Год назад +2

      @@rbs1997 На чём основан вывод что Россия теряет производственную базу по производству военной техники? Это мягко говоря странно,
      особенно когда прямо сейчас идёт строительство ряда новых заводов по производству самолётов, бронетехники, а так же снарядов, ракет и беспилотников. Идёт набор и переобучение специалистов на военные производства.

    • @user-vt1vy2bp8r
      @user-vt1vy2bp8r Год назад

      @@user-mz5hu1cs6s Телевизор.

  • @Christopher-li6gg
    @Christopher-li6gg Год назад +68

    I bet it's fabulous to see the turret fly off.

    • @Animal.CUT...
      @Animal.CUT... Год назад +9

      WELL ... not yet ,but we'll see some german tanks in this situation :)))

    • @someoneuser9646
      @someoneuser9646 Год назад +5

      Hey lol at least the crew will survive unscathed unlike poor t-72 tankers

    • @denisionescu5072
      @denisionescu5072 Год назад +13

      @@Animal.CUT... german tanks have their ammo in a protected compartment in the back of the turret, and if the ammo explodes, hatches open to let the energy out, leaving the tank intact.
      Nice try, we have standards here in nato, we don't have ridiculous design peoblems like you do.

    • @Pearloryx
      @Pearloryx Год назад +4

      ​@Animalcult .I they don't have autoloaders unlike the Russian ones so do your research :D

    • @EduardoJimenez-rk8nw
      @EduardoJimenez-rk8nw Год назад

      🤣🤣🤣🤣 TRUE !!!!

  • @stephennewton2777
    @stephennewton2777 Год назад +2

    All very well, but have they got around the key issue of being towed away by farmers?

  • @normmcrae1140
    @normmcrae1140 Год назад +83

    They should REALLY try to get news clips that are LESS than 5 years old! 🤣 Update- 2023 - there are 14 T-14's in existence, and they can't build any more because ALL the sights, etc DO come from the West - and are no longer available to Russia.

    • @er.m.s8930
      @er.m.s8930 Год назад +8

      Were you the incharge of the production?

    • @chunkymonkey55555
      @chunkymonkey55555 Год назад +1

      If its that good, just dump a load of artillery on it when they turn up on the battlefield?

    • @normmcrae1140
      @normmcrae1140 Год назад +8

      @@er.m.s8930 If you listened to it - they said that the T-14 MAY appear in the 2020 Armaments show..... That was 3 years ago, now.....

    • @user-xo6uo5vv2k
      @user-xo6uo5vv2k Год назад

      Αν πιστέψουμε ότι λέει η Δύση, τότε η Ρωσία έχει τελειώσει από πέρυσι. Πράγμα που δεν το βλέπω .

    • @user-xo6uo5vv2k
      @user-xo6uo5vv2k Год назад

      Ααα και να μην το ξεχάσω η ετήσια παραγωγή σιταριού φέτος στην Ρωσία ήταν 150.000.000 τόνοι. Βλέπεις πως όταν το κλίμα της γης γίνεται θερμό η Ρωσία γίνεται πλούσια. Όταν το κλίμα γίνεται ψυχρό η Ρωσία γίνεται απροσπέλαστη.
      Από μόνη της η Ρωσία είναι ένας όλοκληρος κόσμος. Πολύ μεγάλη για να περικυκλωθεί, πολύ πλούσια για να πεινάσει, πολύ ισχυρή για να νικηθεί.

  • @pers1551
    @pers1551 Год назад +3

    I wonder what kind of rubber they used for armour

  • @GenaMatogen
    @GenaMatogen Год назад +11

    The combat weight of Armata is about 55 tonns

    • @GenaMatogen
      @GenaMatogen Год назад

      @@user-uy7jc4ub8b от куда дровишки?

    • @footofblut981
      @footofblut981 Год назад

      The combat weight is 0 since it wont see combat ever😂

    • @GenaMatogen
      @GenaMatogen Год назад

      @@footofblut981First They said it doesn't exist, then they said it's a plywood mockup, and now they say it will never come to a battle...

  • @watcher5729
    @watcher5729 Год назад +2

    The unmanned machine gun with fuzed burstrounds agaist snipers and small uavs would be cool

  • @ValensBellator
    @ValensBellator Год назад +64

    Comparing the M1A2 with the T-14 is like comparing warhorses to unicorns. The former’s performance is battle tested and is quite numerous, while the latter is purely theoretical and barely exists at all heh

    • @realdaybreaker8013
      @realdaybreaker8013 Год назад +12

      Battle tested in Yemen by insignificant forces

    • @clam741
      @clam741 Год назад +16

      The m1 never went up against anything even remotely worthy , therefore it’s in the exact same boat as the armada

    • @lip124
      @lip124 Год назад +11

      The tank is so advanced that nobody has seen it anywhere other than parades🤣🤣.

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Год назад +3

      @@lip124 they're saving the T-14s for the Abrams. Bring it.

    • @lip124
      @lip124 Год назад +8

      @@wolfswinkel8906 🤣🤣

  • @aaronfire359
    @aaronfire359 Год назад +39

    Thank you for an objective and informative video! Keep up the great work! It'll be interesting to finally see these Tanks in action and see how they operate, how their offensive and defensive systems hold up to an actual life or death battle...

    • @rwps3677
      @rwps3677 Год назад +9

      You will not see them in battle in the near future, most likely never.

    • @aaronfire359
      @aaronfire359 Год назад +1

      @@rwps3677 I don't see why not. They are domestically produced in Russia and any specific components which might not be produced in Russia can be procured via 3rd party countries, or copied and then domestically produced.

    • @rwps3677
      @rwps3677 Год назад +8

      @@aaronfire359 There's 14 of these Tanks, nobody really knows how much of them are in a combat ready state.
      The serial production never started.
      I doubt they start now under pressure.

    • @aaronfire359
      @aaronfire359 Год назад +3

      @@rwps3677 Apparently they started serial production in 2021, and Russia actually has a domestic arms industry. Just like the great wars of history, industry doesn't stop because a war is happening, the engines continue to grind on. I'd say the Russians were in worse straights when the Wehrmacht was quickly approaching Moscow and the Soviets desperately had to push them back. The Russians can certainly pull this off

    • @alansmith4595
      @alansmith4595 Год назад +1

      69 built tanks in total. 7 sent to Ukraine special millatery operation. All dead or broke down within 48 hours. It will be an act of desperation to see anymore on the battle feild.

  • @johnoliver4739
    @johnoliver4739 Год назад +29

    The tank Russia has spent more than half a decade trying to afford to build... And still don't have but a handful.

    • @haysnairte4
      @haysnairte4 Год назад

      Speaks a lot of where the West's taxpayer money goes into... Hence their mindset

    • @nkristianschmidt
      @nkristianschmidt Год назад

      they don't even have good infantry gear

    • @tatianalyulkin410
      @tatianalyulkin410 Год назад +2

      So? How is it the Russians fault? We're the ones who're afraid of a little competition.

    • @Solado
      @Solado Год назад +5

      @@tatianalyulkin410 Meds, Now.

    • @richlopez5896
      @richlopez5896 Год назад +3

      Around 20 and they will never see combat. Just for parades

  • @MartVan
    @MartVan Год назад +1

    Will this tank disintegrate it self. How far does the turret pops. Can I get a extended warranty?

  • @evonrn2000
    @evonrn2000 Год назад +12

    Tow flies over the tank and violently blows shrapnel downwards....reactive armor won't save it.

    • @pashapasovski5860
      @pashapasovski5860 Год назад

      You must be an expert! Shrapnel can't defeat a Hummer,nevermind a tank, any tank,yet you got 12 likes,from equally educated peers, armchair generals! You probably never saw a tank in real life, any tank is a monster made to destroy bunkers and never alone!
      They are in a unit,squad of soldiers complementing each other's strengths and weaknesses! You think that they don't have drones overseeing the area,experience to figure out spots for ambush, artillery barrage before infantry moves trough!
      Top of the tank is the hardest to hit,it's a very small area for a lookout, but you forgot one thing T14 doesn't have a top hatch,it's just a shell covering wires and Afganit has laser detection that instantly fires shotgun blast into area that's lazed! Top of T14 has very thin shell because it doesn't need it,everything important is under, except the gun that's heavily protected! So even if Afganit doesn't work a Depleted uranium dart would pass trough and tank won't be damaged! Children!
      Russia doesn't need more tanks, they have enough artillery to level Ukraine and only thanks to Putin, Army is avoiding collateral damage, otherwise, some hardliners would have made a parking lot!

    • @evonrn2000
      @evonrn2000 Год назад

      @@pashapasovski5860 Things on the ground say different :) Lesser Advanced hand held systems like Javelin alone have buried many Russian Soldiers in Tanks.....REAL TALK!

    • @pashapasovski5860
      @pashapasovski5860 Год назад

      @AGN I don't know what are you watching, I get news from inside,I have a lot of friends on both sides, some are married and the word is,Ukraine is loosing drastically, Russia is setting traps leaving opportunities for reinforcement that gets shredded! The best and most trained are gone and this is before some 300K reservist deployed! Russia is building fortification expecting NATO joining the leftover! Territory was never the objective, killing radical neonazis was! Russia held 5 military exercises in Siberia, tank biathlon, factories are working 24/7 because they are not stupid to think it's only Ukraine they are fighting, it's NATO that wants to brake up Russian Federation and later China!
      Kids like you find great pleasure in watching some tank blown up,most were leftover from Donbas militias, but nothing since the beginning, when they realized that Clown has no power in his country and he is controlled by Pretorians, Ultra nazis who made it clear who runs the show! I've been trough a civil war twice and watching kids, Slavic kids getting slaughtered brakes my heart! Same happened to Yugoslavia then Serbia, chasing kids to put them into uniform and send them into fire! Same propaganda was used then as is now and American people are probably the most naive, buying what government sells! I never played war games, but war,even if you are winning is loosing for average citizens, only rich get richer, while poor are dying!

    • @yourlocalkrieger
      @yourlocalkrieger Год назад

      @@pashapasovski5860 you must be an expert! Because this is exactly how the Bradley’s tow missile system works. It flys above the turret then sends shrapnel straight through the top of turret killing the crew.

  • @fubartotale3389
    @fubartotale3389 Год назад +13

    It looks impressive, but with the endemic corruption of the Russian state. Instead of depleted uranium armor, it uses depleted Hyundais.

  • @matthewhuszarik4173
    @matthewhuszarik4173 Год назад +8

    That reactive armor is it the same cardboard armor found in the T-90s and T-80s?

    • @user-zh4sg1fy1j
      @user-zh4sg1fy1j Год назад

      Картонная броня? Смешно.

  • @sportsfanivosevic9885
    @sportsfanivosevic9885 Год назад +2

    When you have thousands of tanks in your inventory, why would you produce thousands more if your stocks are still strong. If the need presented, production of the T14 would certainly ramp up.

  • @Harry_the_handyman
    @Harry_the_handyman Год назад +1

    You guys forgot to say it can scratch your ass from space lol

  • @lt.dashkov1079
    @lt.dashkov1079 Год назад +5

    Legenge has it this tank can't be killed bc of a new piece of technology called Unactive Battlefield kill technology. Amazing

  • @user-sb4vn3uw7x
    @user-sb4vn3uw7x Год назад +5

    Надо посмотреть его в бою, потом будет видно.

  • @jethrosaber-6717
    @jethrosaber-6717 Год назад +1

    The budget was released for the production... And was never seen again. 😭🤣

  • @davewitter6565
    @davewitter6565 Год назад +1

    Did I loose something in translation? Why would you name anything Armada after what happened to the Spanish Armada in 1588.

  • @bc-guy852
    @bc-guy852 Год назад +62

    This thing sounds pretty decent - - if they can make any that have all of the features - instead of things being left out or faked, so you know - russians can have their yachts...

  • @whitebeauty759
    @whitebeauty759 Год назад +44

    This is the next target for the updated TB-2 drone ! 🙂

    • @Kayzef2003
      @Kayzef2003 Год назад +22

      Have noticed there are no longer, Bayrakters being used in Ukraine?
      A former NATO pilot said Russian ECW has rendered them practically useless in Ukraine.

    • @whitebeauty759
      @whitebeauty759 Год назад +2

      @@Kayzef2003 The software of the new TB-2 drone has been recently updated. You did not know that?

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Год назад +11

      @@whitebeauty759 what is the name of the new version, mr liar?

    • @fofal
      @fofal Год назад +7

      @@whitebeauty759 SOFTWARE BRUH :D

    • @Ali-hu8jr
      @Ali-hu8jr Год назад +4

      @@whitebeauty759 Yeah, i know, updated with your teeth as its chip.

  • @nkristianschmidt
    @nkristianschmidt Год назад +2

    so, trick is to fire at it with an auto cannon and then a main weapon after a couple of seconds

  • @habarakadageperera1298
    @habarakadageperera1298 Год назад

    Great clip.
    Thanksp

  • @user-vv3om2dh3l
    @user-vv3om2dh3l Год назад +5

    Реально российские танки и другие оружие и орудие это шедевры Военного времени. Это мощь

    • @user-ob3ry1rl5m
      @user-ob3ry1rl5m Год назад +1

      Что-то этой мощи не заметно в реальной войне. Не в прямом, не в переносном смысле. Как армата глохла на параде в курсе, а вот как проявляла себя на поле боя - не слышали.

    • @user-vv3om2dh3l
      @user-vv3om2dh3l Год назад

      @@user-ob3ry1rl5m Антон всё выясняется в сравнениях. Любой вид оружию возьми не украинскую,( её как таково нету. )Натовскую. . Наша на поколения выше. И орудия, и потомки Катюши, ярсы, посейдоны и другие сатанушки😂😂😂. А кинжал прелесть. Надо гордиться. И не забывай мы воюем против всех. Хохлов уже нету. Это правда. Надо смотрит правду глаза

    • @user-yw8cs9vo8y
      @user-yw8cs9vo8y 11 месяцев назад

      @@user-vv3om2dh3l Против всех? По-вашему крайне ограниченная помощь оружием от НАТО Украине это называется против всех??? Дружочек, да если НАТО реально вступит в войну, то российской армии не станет через неделю. Хватит даже вступления в войну одной Польши, чтобы российский фронт везде гарантированно посыпался. Когда Израиль воевал против арабских государств, которых щедро снабжал всем Совок и даже совковые генералы руководили арабскими армиями, Израиль не говорил, что воюет с СССР. Никто никогда не считал помощь вооружениями, добровольцами и советниками участием в войне. Только вот РФ считает, потому что надо как-то оправдать свою немощность и позор.

    • @user-vv3om2dh3l
      @user-vv3om2dh3l 11 месяцев назад

      @@user-yw8cs9vo8y ограниченный помощ говориш от НАТО?ну ну😂😂😂. Да у них склады пусты. Техника не заводится. Сначала ремонтирует потом отправляют. А Польшу наш один десантный батальон оторвёт. 50государство скинулись, и ещё наёмников там куча. А хахлы уже заканчивается. Только Бахмуте 50тыс положили убитыми.
      Да, мы слабые, у нас оружия нету, воевал не умеем. 😂😂😂

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev 7 месяцев назад

      @@user-ob3ry1rl5m она не глохла а встала на ручник, я понимаю тупость американцев, но ты то ведь можешь посмотреть видео как танк уехал с парада своими силами? это было опровергнуто 5 лет назад а ты всё ещё веришь в американскую пропаганду.

  • @henryekebosi389
    @henryekebosi389 Год назад +5

    I heard that it is capable of Anti submarine warfare and able to assist in Air to Air combat🤣

    • @jozseftoth9368
      @jozseftoth9368 Год назад

      That is the F-35 submersible attack fighter

    • @yourlocalkrieger
      @yourlocalkrieger Год назад

      @@jozseftoth9368 nahh that’s the wooden Su75

  • @thommyrubin1866
    @thommyrubin1866 Год назад +7

    T-14....Still stuck at the parade?...

  • @saltykrug
    @saltykrug Год назад +2

    I think you meant to say it doesn't need a loader, since it has an auto loader. I forgive you, I know what you meant. Good video.

    • @TheEeRlan
      @TheEeRlan Год назад

      TANK T 34 from different countries! US running engine from BMW and electronics Italy and France after the USSR asked to redo the T34 and the Americans redid everything! Since then, the modernization has been going on! That's how all the equipment of the Russian Federation is from other countries!

  • @imd-in67
    @imd-in67 Год назад +6

    Thanks for the objective video, it was educational and fun.

    • @Military-TV
      @Military-TV  Год назад +3

      Our pleasure!

    • @A.G.P.115
      @A.G.P.115 Год назад +1

      @@Military-TV ha!

    • @mosnicolae1678
      @mosnicolae1678 Год назад +1

      Indeed! Russian propaganda is really funny!

    • @imd-in67
      @imd-in67 Год назад +1

      @@mosnicolae1678 we are talking about technical information, performance is another thing, same thing goes for any piece of tech, Western, Eastern it does not matter, the battle field is not what you think, or what you believe. There is no propaganda in this video only general info.

    • @mosnicolae1678
      @mosnicolae1678 Год назад

      @@imd-in67 general info coming from propaganda channels

  • @thisisyourcaptainspeaking2259
    @thisisyourcaptainspeaking2259 Год назад

    I just bought one of these used, currently awaiting delivery.

  • @hithere8753
    @hithere8753 Год назад +1

    Next up on "Things that will never be produced"

  • @Tamburello_1994
    @Tamburello_1994 Год назад +12

    The Foxbat of tanks.

    • @Tw1st3d_Real1ty
      @Tw1st3d_Real1ty Год назад +1

      i see you also know the foxbat nice

    • @yourlocalkrieger
      @yourlocalkrieger Год назад

      This is the most true statement I have ever heard lol. Everyone is scared of it until we actually see it combat

    • @Tamburello_1994
      @Tamburello_1994 Год назад

      @@yourlocalkrieger 😉

  • @williammiller7799
    @williammiller7799 Год назад +3

    I thought the T90 was designed and built after the fall of the USSR. I thought the last tank designed and built during the USSR was the T80.

    • @theodorkorner1497
      @theodorkorner1497 Год назад +3

      The T90 is just a rebranded T-72 Upgrade

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Год назад +1

      @@theodorkorner1497 nope

    • @theodorkorner1497
      @theodorkorner1497 Год назад +2

      @Wolfs Winkel It was originally named T-72BU. It was renamed after the disastrous performance of the Iraqi T-72s in the Gulf War

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev 7 месяцев назад

      @@theodorkorner1497 it depends on amount of technology you put into tank. If tank on 90% old on 10% new - it is modernization. If tank on 20% new and 80% old technologies - you can give it new name. Numbers not accurate.

  • @JanMan37
    @JanMan37 Год назад +2

    This tank is unstoppable because the brakes don't work!

    • @bren2385
      @bren2385 Год назад +1

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @MrNorma77
      @MrNorma77 Год назад

      Тормоз это ты 😂

  • @meatballjosh
    @meatballjosh Год назад +1

    What gets me is that there probably aren’t even as many actual T14s as there are in the thumbnail of this video.

    • @BigSmartArmed
      @BigSmartArmed Год назад +2

      "probably" will be the word most associated with the current downfall of the West.

    • @user-cy3me8li9w
      @user-cy3me8li9w Год назад

      ~60 testing in Army now

  • @skaweimc
    @skaweimc Год назад +3

    This was just first russian tank not soviet and they are already doing very well

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev 7 месяцев назад

      how about t-80 bvm, t-72b3, all t-90?

  • @GRosa250
    @GRosa250 Год назад +6

    I wonder how high the turret will fly. I’m sure we’ll find out

    • @bobaa4268
      @bobaa4268 Год назад +3

      It is like the T-90s, except now we will probably see how some Ukrainian tank turrets fly before the inevitable T-14 turret flight test.

    • @daverose4774
      @daverose4774 Год назад

      G Rosa.your so predictable its quite sad

  • @Corvin666
    @Corvin666 Год назад +1

    Like how the caption pic has 3 real tanks and 20 photoshopped behind them

  • @frankjames4743
    @frankjames4743 Год назад +1

    This seems like an old video. The latest date mentioned was 2021 and no mention of Russia's 'special military operation'.

  • @azmagaref
    @azmagaref Год назад +18

    It's totally new approach that no crew member sits in the turret, so the crew are safer being isolated in the front section. This is a big jump in tank design.

    • @Abluemoon9112
      @Abluemoon9112 Год назад +3

      No it is not. It is dumb. If there is a jam, no one can clear it.

    • @Green__Ghost
      @Green__Ghost Год назад +2

      You make it sound like unmanned turrets have never been done before. It's also a terribly designed turret since you can't clear jams without leaving the tank.

    • @azmagaref
      @azmagaref Год назад

      @@Green__Ghost It's the only MBT having an unmanned turret with modern APS technology, this is an amazing tank indeed.
      Try coping harder.

    • @Green__Ghost
      @Green__Ghost Год назад +1

      @@azmagaref I'm not the one coping here, my friend, I'm only pointing out the facts that have already been revealed.

    • @azmagaref
      @azmagaref Год назад

      @@Green__Ghost lol The tank is still in testing, it's hasn't seen any combat, and you already have "facts"!
      So you have "facts" that the engineers of it are unaware of..? Ok genius.😂

  • @paulmurray8922
    @paulmurray8922 Год назад +6

    Well, you gotta hand it to the Russians. Nobody is better at composing weapon specs than them.

  • @craigrik2699
    @craigrik2699 Год назад

    This is truly the first 21st Century tank, all the others were designed back in the 70's to the 90's. The whole concept of this tank is beyond anything any other country has done. My only concern is from an EMF strike, down goes its battery pack? A broken down tank on a battlefield is a dead tank

  • @angelo_giachetti
    @angelo_giachetti Год назад

    What is "aurora polaris" ?
    Is that code? If so why?

  • @johnvu7570
    @johnvu7570 Год назад +7

    Nice on paper!

  • @BlackSkyTrooper
    @BlackSkyTrooper Год назад +8

    It has a long and smoothbore barrel. Meaning it has long range and fast armor shell being fired.

    • @xxxxxx24
      @xxxxxx24 Год назад +3

      No. It means they ammo are garbage.

    • @1arritechno
      @1arritechno Год назад +1

      Smoothbore is like a Shotgun // a Rifle barrel as used on the UK Challenger Tanks have a better range and in evidence ; proven to be far more accurate....

    • @sweetytobleron656
      @sweetytobleron656 11 месяцев назад

      @@1arritechno Challenger - gun 120 mm. Armata - 125 or 152. Crew - 4 vs men. Weight - 62.5 tonn vs 55 tonn. And ye, Challenger has manual loading. This tank sucks.

  • @user-tk3gd7zb4o
    @user-tk3gd7zb4o 11 месяцев назад +1

    В любом случае главное- экипаж! Ваши леопарды и абрамсы курят в сторонке! Фишка этого танка в том, что он в скором времени будет беспилотным) Всем мира) Привет из России)

  • @peterking8586
    @peterking8586 Год назад +1

    It doesn’t appear to have a stabilized gun?

  • @scottr237
    @scottr237 Год назад +5

    There are only 24 of these, but they have a ton of technical issues.

    • @sheriff0017
      @sheriff0017 Год назад +1

      Have you ever seen 24? The most that have ever been seen together is 9. I'd go with 9.

    • @Psychedelic_Soldier
      @Psychedelic_Soldier Год назад

      ​@@sheriff0017 don't make it up, no one knows how many there are. If you focus on media reports, there are already more than 200 of them.

    • @sheriff0017
      @sheriff0017 Год назад

      @@Psychedelic_Soldier That's untrue. The Russians know, only they won't be honest about it.
      You can't tell me not to make it up, then cite (presumably) Russian media reports which absolutely are making it up.
      The rule is: if you didn't see it, the Russians don't have it. Have you seen more than 9 T-14s in the same place?

  • @pm71241
    @pm71241 Год назад

    But... Where is it?

  • @FlorinSutu
    @FlorinSutu Год назад +1

    9:49 - - So, the video was posted on RUclips in Feb 2023, but it was definitely made before 2020, possibly in 2019.

  • @Piedone21
    @Piedone21 Год назад +8

    This tank is so stealthy none were seen in Ukraine in 11 months

  • @Stan_the_Belgian
    @Stan_the_Belgian Год назад +17

    The camouflage if t-14 is so advanced, nobody even noticed it in ukraine

    • @user-ms9oo7hi9p
      @user-ms9oo7hi9p Год назад

      Скоро там будут уебищные песочные абрамсы гореть

    • @alekceykopanin240
      @alekceykopanin240 Год назад +1

      Все свое время!

    • @doemis8573
      @doemis8573 Год назад

      My sugesstion: Due to it's permanently rotating turret, look up to the sky. Maybe the armata was never supposed to be a tank!

  • @blairlindsay5791
    @blairlindsay5791 Год назад

    transmission failures will persist until the slush box fluid is reformulated to deter the crew from drinking it

  • @MoonlightVKV
    @MoonlightVKV Год назад +3

    It looks like a modern T-34

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev 7 месяцев назад

      all today generation tanks are modern t-34, but armata is next gen, where gun and crew separated.

  • @klauskainzinger9978
    @klauskainzinger9978 Год назад +1

    The Russians should highly considering installing a parachute into their turrets. It will make it easier to recover and reinstall again🤣

  • @taxpayer239
    @taxpayer239 Год назад +1

    Does it come with separate compartment for vodka ?

  • @dmnguye69
    @dmnguye69 Год назад +3

    Does the turret have a feature to launch 200 feet into the air?

    • @oogie493
      @oogie493 Год назад

      No, that's a feature exclusive to the German Leopard 2.

    • @dmnguye69
      @dmnguye69 Год назад +1

      @@oogie493 Ah thanks for the update. I also heard they might have to add a self tow motor just incase the Armata stalls during a parade. That would be an excellent feature to have 😀

    • @oogie493
      @oogie493 Год назад +1

      @@dmnguye69 Why would they need that, when the Armata has never stalled before? I'm pretty sure you're talking about the time when a driver pulled the parking brake. That's why when the tow came it wasn't budging.

    • @dmnguye69
      @dmnguye69 Год назад

      @@oogie493 ok buddy you win. But I think the loud speaker there did blasted out..“We have demonstrated how the evacuation of military hardware [during battle] will be conducted. The tank’s stop was planned,”

  • @lip124
    @lip124 Год назад +10

    The tank is amazing on paper and still is on paper. Also, it can't be built cause of sanctions. T-14 have ejection seats, that US don't have🙄🙄.

    • @santy07bangbang83
      @santy07bangbang83 Год назад +3

      And it has washing machine, refrigerator, and sports car inside...

    • @HakujinTrue
      @HakujinTrue Год назад +5

      These tanks is already being mass-produced and supplied to the army.

    • @badass6954
      @badass6954 Год назад

      ​@@HakujinTrue 🤣🤣😂😂

    • @matthiaslaue66
      @matthiaslaue66 Год назад +2

      YES and the most important a vodka bar!

    • @feliciangiuca6825
      @feliciangiuca6825 Год назад

      Everything that Russia puts on the market... of weapons... is always presented as terrifying... when in reality... they are behind technologically!

  • @francescosessa8719
    @francescosessa8719 Год назад

    How many are in working conditions today? 6?

  • @eshantshinde1685
    @eshantshinde1685 Год назад

    Will you show some of the difference between Russian Su-30 and Su-35

    • @user-zh4sg1fy1j
      @user-zh4sg1fy1j Год назад

      СУ-30 существует в огромном количестве модификаций, поэтому такое сравнение было бы очень условным и сложным, основное отличие это более крутая электроника, более экономный и эффективный двигатель радиолокационная станция, она у 35 мощнее, СУ-35 круче по всем этим параметрам, кроме того там используют более совершенное покрытие для снижения заметности (не на всех сериях этой машины), но вцелом СУ-35 это уже предел платформы Т-10.

  • @truth959
    @truth959 Год назад +8

    This is the most powerful and advanced tank in the world. Once Russia works out the bugs, it will be a monster.

    • @meatpopsicle6244
      @meatpopsicle6244 Год назад +3

      Yes all two of them that they can afford to build IF they can even get their hands on the electronics.
      This tank is a propaganda exercise.

  • @_Peperek
    @_Peperek Год назад +19

    Just shoot the turret with apfsds, the tank will be maybe not destroyed, but out of fight for at least a month.
    Also i'm not sure about the effectiveness of the APS knowing Russia's advanced electronics.

    • @vitsobotka6268
      @vitsobotka6268 Год назад +4

      fridge and washing machine microchips dont make the best advanced electronics

    • @titanproductions3628
      @titanproductions3628 Год назад +1

      @@vitsobotka6268 You would've had a fridge and a washing machine by now if you didn't spread CNN propaganda about Russia's capabilities. 🤡

    • @quicksesh
      @quicksesh Год назад

      true - if they are building all of the electronic suite inhouse you would question its ability to work as per the advert.

    • @jozseftoth9368
      @jozseftoth9368 Год назад +1

      Easiest way stopping them is hitting the tracks. Even the best tank can be easily rendered immobile

    • @jozseftoth9368
      @jozseftoth9368 Год назад

      @@vitsobotka6268 those just work fine with their missiles. Though the shiny West already declared back in March 2022 Russia will run out of missiles in two weeks😂
      But the missiles just keep coming.
      They really thought Russia can not make its weapons without their shit?

  • @muzikizfun
    @muzikizfun Год назад

    🎶Where have all the Armadas gone? 🎵 Long time no see!🎶

  • @jrdsm
    @jrdsm Год назад

    hopefully someone post the specs on war thunder forum

  • @Joaquin546
    @Joaquin546 Год назад +9

    So high tech they haven’t made more than a dozen so far! 😂

    • @paranoid9678
      @paranoid9678 Год назад +2

      they never will
      russia dont not have the capebilety to build chips for it fuck they cant even build cars with ABS anymore
      the new lada is missing power stearing, abs, esc or airbags, but it has a multimedi system with many speaker (what every trhat means)
      in fake they has a hand full of t14 in ukrain and so far the optics and engine have problems ( you can say they are shit and not full developed)
      they only make problems

    • @LCDqBqA
      @LCDqBqA Год назад +3

      Other than crew safety and ergonomics it doesn't do anything a T-90M can do at a cheaper price.

  • @davidh7280
    @davidh7280 Год назад

    How many?

  • @user-es4xt7rc7z
    @user-es4xt7rc7z Год назад +1

    great content my favorite military youtube channel i wish you the best for you guys ... can you make vid about the evolution of isis tactics over time especially in urban combat and countering armored vehicle

    • @mopar_dude9227
      @mopar_dude9227 Год назад

      What tactics? ISIS got lit up when they faced an actual military force that wasn’t being held back. All they can do is beat women.

  • @user-vd5ey4ki8b
    @user-vd5ey4ki8b Год назад +4

    Благодаря нашим USA (друзьям) всё улучшается.

  • @mosnicolae1678
    @mosnicolae1678 Год назад +17

    The newest version of T14 is equipped with a klingonian cloaking device. The moskals deployed T14s in Ukraine, but nobody saw them!

    • @Addi_Teacha509
      @Addi_Teacha509 Год назад

      Marioupol and Bakhmut did 😂😂

    • @mosnicolae1678
      @mosnicolae1678 Год назад +1

      @@Addi_Teacha509 this means Batallion Azov managed to resist for months with only infantry against the latest russian tank. And Bakhmut still does!

    • @Addi_Teacha509
      @Addi_Teacha509 Год назад

      @Mos Nicolae resist? The nazis used civilians as human shield that's what you call resist.

    • @mosnicolae1678
      @mosnicolae1678 Год назад +1

      @@Addi_Teacha509 that's what your supervisor in St. Petersburg troll farm paid you to say!

  • @friedrichhielscher1437
    @friedrichhielscher1437 11 месяцев назад +1

    finally, in 2022, 156 tanks of this model came off the factory.

  • @alexandrres
    @alexandrres 11 месяцев назад

    The crew of the tank may not even go to the toilet, especially when the tank is completely destroyed by Javelin - the crew is automatically moved underground using the most advanced technology "AnaloGovNet" underground :)

  • @TheSilentWalkerz
    @TheSilentWalkerz Год назад +1

    T-14 is like the obnoxious “friend” that makes all these absurd claims like “I met LeBron James once and we went to a huge party with thousands of super models”.

  • @oldkayakdude
    @oldkayakdude Год назад +4

    Normally the number indicates year, but in this case it indicates quantity! lol

  • @lukaszurek8801
    @lukaszurek8801 Год назад +18

    Gratulacje czołga dobry

    • @plus5514
      @plus5514 Год назад

      Czołga dobra ale Moskale to zbrodniarze wojenni

  • @wombatwilly1002
    @wombatwilly1002 Год назад +1

    How many do they have,like a dozen?

    • @oogie493
      @oogie493 Год назад

      More than the Ukrainian T84 oplot which is their "main battle tank" and never seen combat before

  • @Shutupbootlicker
    @Shutupbootlicker Год назад +7

    How high does the turret fly on this one?

    • @winkus8586
      @winkus8586 Год назад +2

      $10.000 lancet have killed so many 4 million dollar m777

    • @mosnicolae1678
      @mosnicolae1678 Год назад +2

      Higher than t90's turret.

    • @maggie_n_mitch
      @maggie_n_mitch Год назад +2

      Higher than older types .

    • @poes1314
      @poes1314 Год назад +3

      @@winkus8586 what does towed artillery have to do with a tank ?

    • @lubeman62
      @lubeman62 Год назад +3

      @@winkus8586 👈🏻 = 🤡🤡🤡

  • @whitebeauty759
    @whitebeauty759 Год назад +33

    The latest Russian Iron Coffin on tracks?

    • @khtynozameso680
      @khtynozameso680 Год назад +2

      Западу плевать на Украину - все поставки по чучуть, ради проверки - что русские быстро выбьют, то устарело. Украина это уже не страна, а полигон. Запад пустил Украину в расход. The West doesn't care about Ukraine - all supplies are stuffed, for the sake of checking - what the Russians will quickly knock out is outdated. Ukraine is no longer a country, but a training ground. The West has wasted Ukraine.

    • @HakujinTrue
      @HakujinTrue Год назад +1

      For Ukrnazies

    • @MaxVerhaag
      @MaxVerhaag Год назад

      @@khtynozameso680 already got your consciption notice? can't flee the country anymore! off to the front to die for your great leader!

  • @akhimie
    @akhimie Год назад +6

    Over exaggeration of Russia weapons and his low-tech is alarming!! Almost all the Russian Armored Tanks are defenseless against NATO and US Tanks in Ukraine 🇺🇦
    Funny enough, those NATO Tanks were built in 70s and 80s..The Germans leopard 2 was built over years ago!!..What the US have in their Arsenals as of today, is beyond human imagination ...The Russian and the Chinese better stop barking...All we need is peace ✌️

    • @fubartotale3389
      @fubartotale3389 Год назад +3

      The Abrams is five years older than the Leopard.

    • @akhimie
      @akhimie Год назад +2

      @@fubartotale3389
      In fact, I prayed there should be no war...No Nation can defeat the UNITED STATES on Land Sea and Air..There are some Military weapons not allowed for the public because of other Nations not to be threatened or intimidation..IRAN CHINA RUSSIA AND NORTH KOREA must shut their mouths 😉

    • @colonelradec8268
      @colonelradec8268 Год назад

      13 years old NATO fan kid be like:

  • @skitpare2627
    @skitpare2627 Год назад +2

    Sounds to good to be true. If they are next to undefeatable, they would be in the war right now.

    • @jamesgarner327
      @jamesgarner327 Год назад

      This tank has essentially been a nightmare from it's conception, we might see a few but not many.

    • @MrNorma77
      @MrNorma77 Год назад

      Эти танки не для деревенских боев за украину, это танки для решающего удара по империи зла и разврата.

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev 7 месяцев назад

      i doubt in 100 year anyone build tank that immune against artillery.

  • @user-hv7kt9zc3m
    @user-hv7kt9zc3m 3 месяца назад

    Does the turret take off when you blow it up