The TRUTH About S-400 & ATACMS: Who’s the WINNER?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
- The TRUTH About S-400 & ATACMS: Who’s the WINNER? - Dive into the high-stakes rivalry in modern warfare! On one side, Ukraine, backed by Western allies, wields the ATACMS-a long-range missile for precision strikes. On the other, Russia showcases its powerful S-400 system, blending Soviet legacy with advanced tech to counter threats. Who will gain the upper hand? Will sheer firepower beat advanced precision, or will technology be the ultimate edge? Let's find out!
01:00 - S-400 TRIUMF VS ATACMS
04:14 - HOW IT WORKS IN REAL COMBAT?
Explore more in-depth insights on our website: defensefeeds.com
Sources: pastebin.com/N...
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
Who's writing the script? Kick him out and hire someone better. Since when is mach 2.5 faster than mach 3 ?
In fact S400 speed is 6.2 according to WikiCia
there are 3 type of s400, 1 mach 3, the other mach 6 or 7, and the third mach 14.
atacms is correct
It is obviously AI this channel is that shiet
The s400 that was destroyed in kursk was under maintenance plus the pantsir has dawned the atcams severe times. This annalysis us bullocks
So is this.
This is so amaturish I am ashemed to have wasted time on it.
Atacms win in propaganda video where as s400 won in real combat,war😅
S-400 is the Goat
You mean it might actually hit a goat , LOL, utterly Rubbish .
Rubbish that regularly downing American projectiles. On the other side, go search how many videos about Patriot system destruction you'll find 😉
So you mean to say atacm that are being intercepted are being dropped by Russian ghost?
U just dumb
It really is. Far range and high accuracy. The main reason why it had sometimes failed in ukraine is because US and NATO constantly flies spy planes and electronic warfare planes near ukraine and russia(like the RQ-4B and in critical moments give the s400 a sudden daze, causing the system to malfunction. This happens because russia lacks enough electronic warfare countermeasure units to deploy all across the battlefield. In the inner parts of ukraine where NATO jets cannot reach the S400 is doing perfectly fine and is doing an exquisite job downing atacms,jdams, HARM missiles, and much more. The main reason is that NATO EW drones and aircraft are scared of russian EW countermeasures like the murmansk-BN and the krasukha 4 that has been widely deployed there.
Most ATACMs used by Ukraine were intercepted by S400 and destroyed!!🤣🤣🤣
exactly!
There is also the jamming/spoofing systems employed by Russia. It drastically lowered it's precision.
the patriot is not even close to the s400 bro
You are comparing apples to oranges!
ORWSHNIK vs ATTACMS
or ISKANDAR vs ATTACMS
S400 is air defense!
Besides, Russia already uses S500.
In November 2021, the A-235 Nudol shot down the non-working Kosmos-1481 satellite at an altitude of about 550 kilometers, which became an absolute record for missile defense systems. The characteristics of the complex are classified - presumably, the A-929 rocket used in the installation can destroy satellites at an altitude of up to 1,000 kilometers.
The Peresvet laser complex is capable of disabling space objects at a distance of up to 1.5 thousand kilometers.
The S-500 can not only intercept ballistic missile warheads, but also hit low-flying spacecraft. Presumably, the guaranteed damage zone of the complex is about 800 kilometers.
The S-550 anti-aircraft missile system (SAM), based on the S-500 Prometheus, became the world's first mobile specialized anti-missile and anti-space defense system. It is capable of effectively destroying intercontinental ballistic missiles.
Both vehicles are amazing, but I think it’s incorrect to compare these two models… More suitable to compare Iskander-M with ATACMS.
Btw I made LEGO Iskander-M and ATACMS, check it out them, I hope you like it!🥰
This is full of misunderstanding of what is an air defense, it's caracteristics, and also why the Russians are constantly upgrading their systems. The S-400 no longer exist in Russia and have been replaced everywhere by the S-450 with longer range and much higer speeds. And you can always saturate any defense systems, even the best one, mith more targets that he can handle. So why Russians suffer sometimes losses, but at a huge price for the attackers. So even if some are destroyed, it's from far the best system around, and they also have the S-500 for high altitude targets and the S-550 to shoot down targets in SPACE. The shooting distance vary with models from 120 to 380Km and speeds froml 2.6 to 5.0 machs.
Wrong information, S-400 interceptor is flying with hypersonic speed up to 4.7 km/sec, depending of the type of interceptors.
S-400 is used exclusively to protect very valuable targets. For protection of other possible targets Russians use S-300, Tor, Pantsir, Buk, and other short range systems.
No ATACMS passed S-400 unless launcher was empty. There is simply no relevant comparison between ATACMS and S-300 because they have different purposes. However well over 80% of ATACMS were destroyed and that speaks volumes.
Maximal speed of Oreshnik is Mach 15 which is more than 4 km/sec. Only very high speed can cause such damage even without explosive in warhead.
Comparing surface to air and surface to surface system it's just bull shit comparison
Where do u get ur information from?, be carful what u say Mr. Military TV (Hollywood) SHOW
he is under the crack effect
If the oreshnics didn't damage anything then it's speed must be quite slow, easy target for air defence.
Why it was not intercepted.
video maker is smoking crack
S400 easily intercepting atacms should never be something that is seen as crazy. The Atacms has a fixed parabolic path it follows, making it really easy to target. And it travels at rather slow speeds compared to something like the kinzhal, which makes it even easier to hit.
Garbage Hollywood weapons and LIAR western propaganda channel.😂😂😂😂
Iskander in Russia is not one, but two complexes with different characteristics and tasks. Thus, the Iskanedr-M is "charged" with a high-altitude, up to 50 kilometers, supermaneuverable quasi-ballistic missile 9M723 with the function of "invisibility". Its task is to bypass any missile defense system at speeds exceeding six sound levels. To reach it at the "fork" of heights from 20 to 50 kilometers. Modern Western air defense systems are practically unable to intercept it. For greater reliability, the rocket is coated with special radio-absorbing compounds and equipped with false targets. The effective range is up to 500 kilometers.
The Iskander-M complex, which uses the R-500 cruise missile (launch range up to 500 km), has the task of hitting the enemy on an ultra-low trajectory, at an altitude of up to 6-7 meters above the ground. Which makes NATO apologists shudder. However, if the Iskanders are suddenly used in a complex, there is no point in shaking. Such a doublet of Russian "tacticians" is guaranteed to "roll out" any defensive area.
The Iskander division's salvo is easily capable of destroying an entire US missile defense position area.
What about destruction of Patriots by Iskander.
This is so wrong in so many levels…
what about if you explain us more
This channel isn't bias, a reason why I love it. Truths and facts alone
Sarcasm at it's finest.
Pretty sure more patriots have been destroyed in this war than the S-400. Why hasn't Ukraine been able to destroy the Kursk bridge, which is defended by S-400 systems and more recently the S-500 system. The bridge has been stated to be one of the main targets of the war.
2:43
S400 travels at Mach 2.5, while atacms is little slower at Mach 3. Hmmm...
Need to reschool myself. Unaware math, physics, & everything has been reversed
😂😂😂😂
Watching your channel is like a ticket to a world of fun and joy. Thank you for your creative and energizing work!💜🌆🥰
NATO vs Russia. who is winning?
Also russia
Ukraine isn't NATO from the start but Russia invaded Ukraine because they're pushing for NATO membership n NATO is also considering Ukraine to be their member as a shield n offence platform to Russia that's why Russia invaded Ukraine
It depends where the war would be. In Ukraine NATO cannot win, but can cause destruction and big losses on both sides.
This video doesn't make any sense to me....
Then now we will wait to see Iakander Missile vs Patriot System pliz show us.
but what about Tor m2 SAMs? Weren't they supposed to protect S-400 SAMs?
Talking about comparing apples to oranges...
Since when was Mach 3 slower than Mach 2.5 (2:41) in the video.
Ukraine doesn't have enough atacms to have the upper hand.
You're lying because ATACMS are compared with ISKANDER not S-400
I heard 2 batteries of S-400 had been destroyed by ATACMS
The dagger complex destroyed in 2023 , one electronic warfare system and 5 Patriots , with one blow , then in the same year 4 patriots , with one blow . Patriot fired 32 missiles at one dagger missile, and did not shoot down.
@Achilles-n4o these all things you write I already know ok but this 👆 I think 2 batteries of S-400 had been destroyed
There is zero evidence that it was the S-400. it is a fake and a deliberate stuffing of the CPSO. If it was the S-400, the fireworks would be huge. In the photos, there are no signs of the S-400 being present, the Ukrainian military needed to somehow show at least some success in order to ask for more missiles. so they fabricated this fake.
fake propaganda is their job.
S400 vs Patriot
The worst video you've ever made
So much falsehood 😂
What a terrible video.
Is this a trick question?
Hahahaha. I would seriously take the older S300 than any Nato missile defense system
S400 is AA system not ofensive.the iskendar looks more effecting in spotted duel launch
seems tne winner in duel once spoted.then upgraded cheaper smerch is upgraded
8:17 atacm get shot down 90% of the time
Must be USAID sponsor
S400. ❤❤
Bias reporting won't get you anywhere
Вы обсолютно не компитентны или спицально водите в заблуждения в этот раз вы получаете двойку.
Each of your content is a masterpiece! Keep inspiring us with your creations!🐫🍾💙
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I guess USAID still going
Cmon s400 is equivalent patriot not atacms lol😂😂😂.......iskander is equivalent atacms
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 um the comedian turned politician mr Zelensky choses to turned his Ukraine into a testing ground for world weaponeries 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 ok almighty god is Russians once again defeating the Nazis-zelensky like they did with Nazis-Hitler thank you 🙏 Russians for your service to humanity across the world 🌎
Biased repor!
U amatures are herby unsubscribed.
Russia sucks😂😂
U.S.- 💪
bogus nato lackey
lame shite
The deep.shit is here to
😂😂 us is a shit country boy
American technology is best that's why Ukrain lose 20% of its land if Russian technology will become better then all ukrain will be under Russia😂
Anything about missiles Russia is ahead at least a century,remember the U2 plane that USSR shut down over Russia early 60’s,