CCM Eflex 6 Total Custom Pro hockey goalie pads review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024

Комментарии • 36

  • @scchrist
    @scchrist 10 месяцев назад +3

    Great review. It's good to see a reviewer, not just Dick Vitale every product and tell me how it's the best.

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  10 месяцев назад +2

      Consumers deserve better than that!

  • @L7spider
    @L7spider Год назад +3

    Sometimes I feel like I wanna give CCM pads a try… and then I watch Matt review them. Thanks for reminding me not to bother brother! LOL

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  Год назад

      I would say there wasn't a tonne wrong with EFlex 5 and the Axis lines.

    • @mikehogan8442
      @mikehogan8442 Год назад

      Any idea why pads do this (lift up off the ice)? My old Kenesky pads did the same thing.

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  Год назад

      Can be a number of things. Strapping, boot shape, overall pad design. For these in the RVH it is partially the boot and the knee. In butterfly it is the knee block and core doesn't sit great.

    • @L7spider
      @L7spider Год назад

      @@mikehogan8442 I’ve found that a tapered boot on a flexible pad is a big time culprit of this.

  • @thebignewfie
    @thebignewfie Год назад +4

    I got a 1-0 shutout a few months back in that set. Brought me good luck lol. Glove was awful.

  • @teachey848
    @teachey848 3 месяца назад

    As a new tendy and bought the CCM Eflex 6.5 (first brand new pads, was on a budget and settled on these for now). After months of use, definitely can confirm on the pad seal issues. For those considering, I'd certainly look away from this line. I know I have the bottom end set of the line, but the straps aren't too different either and found them relatively awkward and the knee block to not be great either. Buyer beware and honestly when the budget works for me, will be buying different brand for sure.

  • @timreeper1295
    @timreeper1295 8 месяцев назад +1

    i just got a good deal on some new e flex 5.5 i know they are the mid grade pad but the quality is still decent !! but there isnt much different ! keep up the good reviews brother !!

  • @JayTheTapp
    @JayTheTapp Год назад +2

    Love my CCM Eflex 4 but will be moving away from them most probably to True PX9. You are right that their player gear is excellent! I wonder if those two division really share tech?

  • @TPGoalie
    @TPGoalie Год назад +2

    I use Axis 2.9 leg pads and they have the same wear guards on the top of the pads, and they are absolutely useless. I've been using the pands about 3 times a week for 6 months, and they've already been worn through. It seems useful in theory, but it's neither thick or hard enough to make any meaningful difference.

  • @macmasks
    @macmasks Год назад

    Great review. I was really excited to maybe move to the eflex 6. Now I’m not so sure. At least not without going and spending a lot of time in a Pure Hockey store.

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  Год назад

      Like I showed, some peoples' custom sets are much better than these in terms of pad seal (still have the cord on the sliding edge though). So if you can find a pair that seal considerably better they would be a big step up from these.

    • @froesei
      @froesei Год назад +2

      Don't be scared off by this video. I have a custom set, max rebound and weave instead of speed skin. These are exceptional pads.

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  Год назад +3

      But this is a custom set... with weave and max rebound 🤔

  • @nemtall
    @nemtall Год назад +1

    Still think the eflex 5 is a better over all Design .They messed this up greatly with the 6 .

  • @jasondowling9296
    @jasondowling9296 5 месяцев назад

    you think the True slide better than the Bauer vapour? I had to get rid of my Trues because I didn’t think they slid good at all. Had to use so much energy just slide over. so weird.

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  5 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah, both of my PX3 True slide better than my Hyperlite 2 and previous Ultrasonic. Not sure about the Hzrdus yet though.

  • @stephenmason5773
    @stephenmason5773 7 месяцев назад

    Great review,, that thigh rise 5 hole coverage is extremely concerning!!

  • @Lightplanke
    @Lightplanke Год назад

    Maybe its a bit to late, but could you review the CCM Axis 2 Chest?

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  Год назад

      Won't happen unfortunately. Don't have easy access to one

    • @Lightplanke
      @Lightplanke Год назад

      @@HockeyReviews OK! Thanks for your work here

    • @deanpixx
      @deanpixx Год назад +2

      Lightweight, comfortable, athletic form-fitting, good lower belly coverage, game ready movement, but be prepared to be covered in bruises all season.

    • @TPGoalie
      @TPGoalie Год назад +2

      I use the Axis 2 chest, and I really like its mobility. The chest has really good protection, but the padding in the arms is terrible, and it feels like there's barely any padding.

  • @taylorsimmonds9957
    @taylorsimmonds9957 8 месяцев назад +1

    Any chance you could get your hands on the new Brian’s Iconik pads and give them a try?

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  8 месяцев назад

      Hopefully! As I always say with this... would help a lot if you reach out to the company and let them know you would want to see a review.

  • @xs8002
    @xs8002 11 месяцев назад

    Do you ever test and review mid tier equipment?

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  11 месяцев назад

      Not usually unfortunately. Most of the gear I get I have to buy, which usually means I will buy custom stuff and I wouldn't be able to get mid tier gear in my specs.
      The sets like this is a demo set, and stores don't really run demos of the mid tier gear.

  • @user-po4pt2gd4j
    @user-po4pt2gd4j Год назад

    Обзор хороший 👍👍👍 Если не нравятся могу забрать 😊😊😊

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  Год назад

      They are available to purchase at Just Hockey! Link in description

  • @newbiegoalie
    @newbiegoalie Год назад

    Made in China. Seems like the actual material but it's actually not, faking till you're not making it when it actually matters.

    • @HockeyReviews
      @HockeyReviews  Год назад +1

      These aren't made in China. The country of manufacture isn't the problem here.

    • @ptak30
      @ptak30 Год назад

      I had a ef5 set for about a year and half with a ton of playing time in them and they held up great

    • @moorecha
      @moorecha Год назад

      @@HockeyReviewswhere then?

    • @bravestender
      @bravestender Год назад

      ​@@moorechaI believe its Vietnam or Thailand.