I listen to modern pros and I wonder how they would have made a living even ten years ago without all the bells and whistles modern mirrorless cameras have in-body to spoil them. The way they talk it's as if no decent images were ever produced before 2018. The 5d mark iii was a top quality pro camera that kept many pro users enjoying fine wine and cigars as a result of it's amazing quality images. You don't need a gazillion focus points to produce iconic images.
Pros value higher hit rates in challenging conditions. It's why modern mirrorless are the real deal and now the go to choice. You're right though, it doesn't mean that you can't get stunning images in challenging conditions with something like the 5Dmkiii. Your hit rate will be lower no matter how skilled you are though.
agreed, as former film shooter, I learned composition and exposure. I can shoot on most any body now and find my shot. I've got mirrorless too, love the R line, but I still go back to the 5D for many reasons. To each his own, but I personally know many working photogs that see no point to drop all that coin to get out of something that continues to be bread and butter consistently(including concert/venue shooters). They'll all tell you the same thing....GLASS GLASS GLASS. :) Cheers.
To me, this camera is a keeper. Aside from build quality, great Canon color science, quick focus, two card slots, numerous lens choices, low light capability, the 5D legendary reputation and many more attributes, it is still good in 2023.
Sorry, disagree with the title. Canon 5DIII is Not a beginners camera. Professionals used it round the globe for paid work. Many of them are still using it. It requires quite a bit of understanding of photography for extracting the optimum performance of this great camera.
It is also not a professional camera in 2023 by technical terms. Hence why learning on a full frame could be very rewarding for a beginner. Why have a beginner drop 500-600 dollars on a rebel and get OK results when they can practically spend the same amount of money on an out of date full frame? Building confidence in your shots is very important and this camera could help beginners with that
@@MirthFilms if a photographer can not make an good image with this camera "in 2023" lol .. than something is wrong. Now if your talking video... Than, yeah... I can see that BUT the 1080 outta the 5D3 is beautiful "in 2023" Thanks and keep at ✌️🕊️✌️
@@MirthFilms, agree with James Cason. Any pro still shooter using R5 will be fully capable to turn out great images with 5DIII as well. In case he fails, it's not a photographer we're talking about.
I'm not a professional, but: - The battery life is phenomenal - Low light is amazing in my experience - Canon colors matter because I hate editing, and resent the idea that I need an indefinite Lightroom subscription to enjoy my craft - Tough body, unparalleled ergonomics, intuitive dials, meaty grip - DSLRs are not trendy, so you get a lot for your money - Viewfinder won't lag, skip, or consume power since it's not electronic - Dual card slots (CF / SD) - Good enough AF for me / my price bracket - Full frame 5Ds are like standard issue military cameras, if that were a thing. They can do the job at the highest level while being versatile, durable, and easy to learn. Most cameras are amazing, but to me the 5D3 is a perfect machine. I got mine for $500+ btw, so don't feel like a chump if you can't find one cheaper. It's a highly capable, professional camera.
I'm a professional and use a 5DIII as my main shooter. It's a fantastic camera and I have to agree with you that it does great in low light, though I only own primes which is something that was mentioned in the video. I've done a number of concerts in low light and had no issues with it whatsoever though. I feel like I've had no AF issues either, except for in significantly low light scenarios. I upgraded two years ago from an original 5D that I had been shooting with for 11 years, so to me the upgrades to the 64 point AF and expanded ISO still feel like huge upgrades to me from what I was used to.
I agree. This camera needs light to lift off the shadows. Pushing the shadows results in horrible noise and banding. It recovers highlights well. Low light does not mean no light in Canon land. Although, being a Nikon shooter is is difficult not to expect miracles from the shadows. I think the man shoots Sony which has a lot in common with Nikon in the sensor dept.,
I'm a professional and have used the 5D3 for several years shooting portraits and weddings. The low-light capabilities for this camera make reception shots in any venue totally usable at high ISO. The AF worked just fine tracking my nephew his Senior year in high school basketball. Southern Illinois gyms are notorious for crap lighting to begin with, and the camera did everything I asked it to do just fine. . Dual card slots are a must for someone shooting gigs for money. This camera, especially given today's prices, is a true value. I'd recommend this camera to anyone without hesitation. Are there newer, better cameras, available 12 years after this one was made? Sure, but this camera, still more than capable, IMO. YMMV.
I'm a beginner. I have always loved taking photos preferably of nature as a hobby. I just purchased this with A 50mm lens to start. Great video for someone like me.
Canon 5dm3 is better now than it was on release day - it takes the same awesome pictures, it costs a fraction of its release price. If you're not making videos and you're into photography - buy it and spend the rest on the lenses. Lenses are way more important than a camera body.
It's actually a videographer's camera. The main reason why the prices stayed so high for used cameras for over a decade is because videographers were installing 3rd party software that unlocks the raw recording option.
I plan to buy a 5d Mark 3 as an upgrade from a Rebel T7, which I bought two years ago. I plan to use the camera as an event photographer for paying clients. I think the camera is "pro" enough, for me.
I would not buy this camera if you are going to be using it for vlogging. It definitely is not “pro” enough for you. If you actually want something decent to vlog(going based off your channel name) get a 6D mark ii. For two reasons, flippy screen and 1080 60fps. Both not available in a “pro” 5D mkiii
With magic lantern installed this thing is a fantastic movie tool. There are rumours that the ML crew are going to make a full frame build of the ML crop mood for the Mk3. This cam will once again kick ass.
If you manage to find *Toshiba Flash Air SD card* (+app) , you can have wi-fi files transfer in any camera + some additional options (not remote shooting, though, it is reserved for native app only). I own couple of these cards and use them with 5D Classic and 5DIII.
I'm still doing a ton of video gigs with that and the Mk IV. IMO it's still a great camera for video, as long as you can handle the manual focus and your customers don't want 4k.
In a sense of shooting HD, I fully agree with you! Having the ability to slap on a crispy prime L lens will still create an incredible image. Even with upscaling it
Um the Canon Mark iii is EXTREMELY good at video. That's all I've used it for. It's cinematic just with the standard lens. I highly recommend for video. The only issue is there is no view finder or auto-focus. So if you're planning to do a video of yourself, you'll need an external monitor. Other than that, don't knock it until you try it.
When I went from the 5Diii to the EOS R I felt like the auto focus and general operation of the EOS R was insanely sluggish, like I have never cursed at any cameras as much as the EOS R. Many of the things which can be changed and adjusted using muscle memory on the 5Diii required menu dives in the EOS R and EOS RP (like white balance, for example, or toggling from one shot to servo on the 5Diii could be assigned to holding the DOF preview button but on the mirrorless cameras this functionality requires more time, your eyes, a left hand, and/or a little bit of brain power to toggle). I miss having a straight, even row of dual-function buttons on top of the camera, where I could make changes with the camera at my side just by feeling it-- to this day (after five years of owning R series cameras) I couldn't draw a picture of the button layout on the top off any R series camera, it's like they flicked paint blobs on a body and let those blobs dictate where the buttons would sit. Even the physical lock switch on the 5Diii was a smarter choice than the unresponsive sterile push-button on the EOS R, which requires looking at the camera to know if it's locked, or remembering whether you locked it, instead of reaching for a quick feel with your thumb to be sure. When canon went mirrorless they basically took their M50 and put a full frame sensor on it, and designed a menu and touch screen driven camera for Gen Z kids who don't want to put their eye on a viewfinder and don't know why there are "clicks" on the shutter wheel. I miss my 5Diii dearly. I only keep my R6 because it has a flippy screen, but the colors are hot garbage and it feels like a plastic Rebel in the hand.
I do understand what you're talkin about the autofocus points but you are more critical on the amount of autofocus points but the autofocus mechanism itself works with lenses and it snaps on really fucking fast. Any professional would not mind using this kind of autofocus because it is very Snappy. As a photographer I feel like everybody should learn how to use simpler versions of features. I use just the center focal point point to where I want to be unfocused and then I reframe for my picture and I do that simultaneously really quick and I take all my shots I don't miss the shots. This camera builds good shooting habits. This is why they created the 2 levels of pressure on the trigger. One to lock the exposure and then fully press to complete the capture but that half press is there so you can put your af point on the thing you want in focus then hold it, reframe and then shoot. I have the 6d mark1 and looking to add this because its old but new enough for me to make up for everything in post. But yhats my style anyway i shoot for post editing since im a heacy graphic designer as well. I shoot flat as possible. I just needed something cheap with a great sensor that at at least had the basics.
I don't know how professional photographers coped 10 years ago with all the draw backs you've listed. Seriously, any good photographer or videographer can easily get outstanding results with the 5d mark III if they know what they are doing.
Had my 5Dmk3 since it was released. The thing with the dual card slots is that you can save different formats to each card. I save RAW to the CF slot and JPG to the SD card. Is great when you want to see what you've got before you've sat down and post processed the images.
Nice video but disagree about the auto focus not being good for professional work. Many professionals still use this camera as their primary and the autofocus is more than adequate. Is the mirrorless autofocus more advanced? Absolutely. But 5DIII is no slouch.
I haven't used the 5d III but I used the 5d II in 2009, I thought the video and photos were very nice from that camera, my complaint was it felt slow next to the 40d that was my main camera at the time. Oddly, I'm still using the 40d but added the original M a few years later so I could shoot some 1080p video. I've been thinking about picking up the 5d iii for its full frame since they are getting into the affordable range. I've shot film for about 60 years too so I can deal with the "old" focusing system.
Does the camera shoot at 1280p and 60fps or not? And why is there an option for 1280 and 60 FPS? And you say only 1080 and only 29 frames Is there a lens that shoots 1280 and 60 fps? Thank you. I hope for a response
I'm considering this body now as an upgrade from my hand-me down EOS 500D. I'm as ametuer as they get, but i'm really interested in trying out a full-frame camera. Was considering the 6D Mark II in the same price range, but the AF is supposed to be even worse on that. Would you say it's still a decent choice a year later, and at what price range? I'm seeing these for anywhere between $650 - $900, which is quite a bit more than what you mention in the video.
I love mine. I do have issues in low light and the grain does suck because I will up the iso to compensate. I am not a pro though so I live with it. Im looking into Lumix so I can use my Canon lenses on it. The weight is taking its toll on me. Sometmes just walking around I will hold it for 2 - 3 hrs. It is too much, even with a hip strap.
Im keeping mine becuase it was such a symbol of the ideal camera to have. Everyone was shooting with the 5D when I was growing up. Im not sure if it is viable but Magic Lantern Modifications can boost the video capabilities of the camera but its not reliable for professional use.
Great video, I have a Canon 6D and most of my photography is indoor gig/concert photography in low light. The 6D is outstanding in low light with its -3EV and the focus is super quick, and I've even shot at 15000 ISO and got great results. However, I've been looking at the 5D mark III is it worth buying or should I get a second 6D
surprised there was no mention of the RAW video hack from Magic Lantern. Improves this camera's IQ by so much, plus adding a ton of video monitoring features, and even some great photo features like an intervalometer
Anyway you said your opinion from your point of view. But still in 2023 more professionals are using this camera for portraits, events and sports. I agree with no wifi functionality and camera is outdated technology. But still it gives pleasure and results to those professional photographers, not youtubers. And moreover Canon 5D M3 is not for beginner level as per photographers view.
I ahoot with 2 5d3s and make money with it then as a side gig, even got chosen as the third best portrait photographer in my country shooting in a small home studio ordinarie people without mua and stylist like the rest had .. this winter I was on a 1.5 hour photowalk in -44.5f and even tough the menus and everything was lagging I still got the shots . It’s built like a tank
I have two. Taken many great photos with them but agree that the auto focus is behind today’s standards. I added a R6M2 to my bag and I’m impressed with the action autofocus. Photographing Flogging Molly again in October. We will see how this stands up to my previous sessions with the band. The venue and light show have much to do with what yo7 can capture. My last concert with them was not so great as there was too much back lighting but one of the opening acts turned out very good. There light show was much move photographer friendly.
We had the mark ii, then the mark iii…and never bothered to go to the mark iv. Over the more than a decade we have used it, the only issue we have ever had is that the little insert on the mode dial got knocked out. It is an absolute workhorse, having paid for itself many times over. Lots of video use back in the day - hundreds of video clients - now we just take stills with it.
As a girl, 5D Mark iii is sooooooo heavy that sometimes I just wanna get rid of it but I still love the quality of the pics took on it. I guess it’s just a love-hate relationship. 😂
I love my 5D mk iii My only complain is indeed about the low amount of series pictures, but rarely use this feature anyways. Noise in low light yes, but Lightroom is very powerful in removing noise which makes it no issue anymore
Hi, I would like to buy a 5d mark iii instead of my 6d classic. Do you think it's a good choice? I would like to gradually start taking pictures of paid work, and I would like a slot for two cards. Also, my 6d only has one usable af point that bothers me... (the center one)
I have Canon 750 D and i planing to buy 5dmark3. Is it worth switching from Canon 750D to 5D? I do street photography, portarts and concert photography.
I just picked up one used at a good price! But I think it is geared more towards professional use! Of all the cameras I own, I'm always drawn towards my Canon Dslr's. I think it's their ergonomics and design and ease of use. Thanks for your opinion , and good video! Paul C.
I shoot basketball photography with this camera Canon 5D Mark iii with Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS III USM Lens. I am a beginner and would like to have your thoughts if this is a good setup? I did get some good pictures using this combo. I am also thinking of getting Canon 24-105mm f/4 IS II USM so I can use this on more close up basketball action. Appreciate your advise and thank you!
Hello, I'm looking to get my girlfriend a new lens for her birthday, which she has the Canon 5d mark iii. Are there any affordable non Canon lenses to avoid with this model or which works with the best for this model? Thanks
Hello, liked your video. i sold my 5d mklll when the RP came out, next bought the R6, but missed the 5Dmkiii. My new to me 5d mklll is due tomorow. bought from Roberts used photo. Can't wait to use it, also can't belive Ifound one with only 6500 clicks on it. Mirrorless is nice but I'm more comfortable with a DSLR. BTW, I don't shoot video.
The 5D Mark III is a great camera...but my biggest gripe is when choosing an auto-focus point, the 'point' is black in color...not red or some other color that is visible in low light situations.
Thinking about getting this or the 5D4 used as an upgrade over my 6D. The upside of the Mark 3 is that Magic Lantern is fully available, while the Mark 4 is a much larger upgrade in terms of autofocus system over the 6D. I have the option of getting a 5D4 with
Not sure what you ended up doing, but I wouldn't bother trading an excellent 6D for an excellent 5D Mark III or IV. 6D is more than awesome for most things and neither 5D model really adds a lot more when compared to other upgrade options out there. I had both the 6D and 5DIII and I used them basically interchangeably. Both had MagicLantern. For me, in 2024, an upgrade from the 6D would be a mirrorless body. Not sure which, as I jumped away from Canon when they got all possessive about the RF mount, but I do at least like my EOS R. I do shoot a Sony A7III and think its beautiful and works pretty well with Canon glass with an adapter (I use the Sigma MC-11 and find it works fine with both Sigma and Canon lenses). I don't do much of any fast action or video work, so can't comment on how well it handles those tasks.
I'm just going to say, if you think the camera isn't good enough for video, first define what you believe "good" is. Then cross-reference it with the knowledge that House Season 6 finale was shot with the 5DMii...
Not a professional photographer, but please let me know if I'm wrong. People still make amazing photos on cameras from '70, so if you're looking to make great digital photography for not a lot of $ I don't see why this shouldn't be an amazing option in 2023, and also in 2033 and beyond. Video is a different thing ofc due to the recent AF improvements and res requirements.
Very nice video, just want to mention, as bad as this camera was for video originally, once modded with Magic Lantern, it is actually the flagship of cheap quality video camera...For those who are interested just search 5dmkiii magic lantern, you will be blow away
Not a professional but going back to my concert photography passion. Do you think as being a non professional the 6D mark II would be a better option for me than the 5D markiii ?
My perspective emphasizes the importance of the photographer's skills over the technical specifications of the camera, highlighting that true artistry and professionalism lie in the mastery of the craft rather than the equipment used. I'm tired of reading comments about whether a camera is professional or not. Whether it has a lot of pixels, Wi-Fi, AI to take pictures without the user having to think, or video capabilities. Many iconic photographs were taken with cameras that some would call toys. The fact is, if a camera was professional 20 years ago, it is still a professional camera today. It doesn't take worse pictures than it did 20 years ago. Can any one explain why analog cameras are making a comeback today and why many internationally recognized professionals are using them again? As far as I know, analog cameras don't have megapixels, Wi-Fi, USB, or video. Yet, many are returning to film photography, and many never stopped using analog cameras, such as Andreas Gursky. A professional photographer has knowledge of photography. They master the basic concepts of composition, know their camera, and can experiment with it. So the discussion about whether one camera is more professional than another is more a discussion about who has more talent using the camera they have at their disposal. Harry Casimor deRham once wrote: "remember the ironic fact that the perfection which can be drawn from the within the depths of the human being can never be found in a machine."
Hello Mirth, a beginners camera? I would say the opposite. All new camera's the camera does it for you. Now a day's people ''does not need to know'' anything about photography. In those day's when the 5DMark3 came out you had to do the job. Someone who does not understand photography could not handle this camera. I used it as a professional for 5 years and another 5 years with the Canon 5DMark2 and I was extremely pleased with it these day's. To take a shot, learn how to focus instead of that the camera does it for you. About filming, with Magic lantern this camera shoots 14 bit Raw 4K footage. Its is not my intention to offend you, but please be objective. Cheers Richard
This camera is amazing. I have to disagree with it being bad for video, if you have magiclantern you can shoot 14bit 1080p RAW which looks better than most cameras today, you can easily upscale the footage to 4k and most people wouldn't even notice
When I started going semi-pro in motorsport I upgraded from a 20d to 1d mark 2. Even the 20d didn't give me too many bad shots and I was shooting BSB, WSB and Motogp. The 1d was pretty awesome for autofocus back then and I can't imagine this being any worse give it came out years later. Oddly enough I've using Sony now and I took some pics of my mate on his road bike, all in focus all bang on. Gave the camera to him to shoot me, pics are all garbage and some nowhere near focus. You can't let the equipment do everything. You need some skill.
Go to Canon 5D Mk 11 they are cheap and will allow you to stay in focus while panning till you press down on the rest of the button and 6 shots will rapidly take place in seconds staying in focus just use 1,250 speed as some experts on You Tube told me, It is sad that the later Canons were lacking when compared with the Mk-ll I am not an expert, but I manage to get the job done, THANKS CANON! Mk-II
@@MirthFilms Would be helpful if you can also add in some sample pictures just like in this video and maybe give a few tips and tricks on how to get the most out of it and Thank you very much i really appreciate your effort, it's not easy putting up these videos because they consume alot of time and require alot of effort so thank you for these videos
Six frames per second is good enough for sport, nature or action. People were taking great photos with 5f/s Eos 5 35mm SLR. You don't really need more.
This video make me temped to look at this camera and so I check it in my country and my god it cost 1200 dollars converted and even for mark ii it cost 700 dollars. Good video nonetheless so good job.
This is a horrible review. This guy obviously knows nothing about this camera. It's no where close to a beginner camera. There's a reason most real professional photographers/videographers still keep these in their fleet being how amazing of cameras they are. And it "takes horrible video " those are definitely lies. You obviously haven't heard about magic lantern either. There's pros filming 5k raw with these things and it looks almost better alot of the 4k cameras currently out right now. Go look at Jannis kalinski and quite a few others vids filmed with these cameras. Do a lil more research and actually learn how to properly use a specific camera before dogging it dude..
Long time Canon user, and now a Sony A7III shooter. Your review is spot on. The low light on the Canon can't touch the "older" Sony. I should sell all my Canon gear while it's worth something, but I still enjoy it.
No problem’ if you are doing only photo, get the mark iii. If you need to do video get the iv or even EOSR since they are technically the same camera in some ways
@@MirthFilms I’m doing both video and photo but it seems like my ii is lagging behind when I’m doing weddings that’s why I was looking at the iii or iv
Bruh you using Sony what do you expect and that Camera even 5D mark II is still good til today em for event and professional shooting you need just to spend more time knowing it and studying it and def great in low light!
The main thing I love about the EOS 5D is how fake the photos can look, especially the very vibrant landscape grass field photos that had been taken on that camera.
You don't recommend the 5D Mark iii for video ? I know a crap ton of film makers who used this camera for some of the most beautifully shot short films I've ever seen. I'm sorry but saying this camera is not great for video is insane to me. I was part of 2 films directly using the mark iii and it provided amazing results.
Unless your on a budget, I’d rather tell someone to look at a GH5 or even a low cost EOS R. They are much more friendly to videographers where this camera lacks a lot of important features
A real professional can make professional photos with a relative cheap camera. It's maybe not as convenient but composition and proper and correct lighting has very little to do with the camera. It is only when you really blow up the photo very large that you might see the difference. Of course the camera manufacturer has to improve to keep the profits going and selling all the 'positive' points to you as if you can't do without those improvements but general speaking it's not the camera itself but the photographer.
I would have to disagree that the 5D Mark III is a good beginners camera. A much better idea would be to buy something a little cheaper and save some money to buy glass. The 5D Mark III is still used by professionals and it is still relatively expensive for most beginners. If a beginner wants a 5D a better option would be a 5D Mark II or a 5D original.
Get a decent skill level with this, and I think it's a professional camera. It is Heavy.... I loved my 5DII, thought Fujifilm was the way to go, but I want to rugged camera that is hard to break, for watersports photography.
Never said this isn’t a pro camera. It definitely is but it came out over 10 years ago. I would not tell professional to buy one in 2023, hence why it is an affordable way to get into full frame if you are a beginner
I bought a 5D MK III in 2017 and literally never used it; not once. In fact it stayed in its original factory seal in my storage facility. When the C-19 epidemic struck I left it sealed in storage because my studio was closed. I, again literally, used the camera for the first time since buying it in 2017 and the image quality was absolutely amazing. Even with the included kit lens. It's definitely a professional piece of equipment and it's still just as relevant in 2023 as a more expensive mirrorless camera.
@@aniebochisom Bruv, I was tasked with using it for the 1st time at a funeral in 2023 and I have fallen back in love with photography and videography. The 5D MK III is a phenomenal camera and I'm going to keep using it. I know you use what's available, but I'm not a supporter of cell phone photography. If you can, find a cheap, used DSLR with a decent lens.
I'm only using this Canon 5D miii with the 17-40mm f/4 lens because of a company I work with, otherwise I would never use this darn thing! I don't like this camera and lens one iota. It weighs a ton, super clunky and doesn't take great pictures and no 4K video. Also has very poor low light performance, super noisy in dark locations, and the AF is a joke, I have to do everything in MF in order to take photos. This camera is an absolute workflow killer, hard to believe this is a full frame camera. I'm selling my Canon R50 because that too has distortion and vignetting issues because of the crop sensor coupled with a subpar Nisi 9mm f/2.8 lens. I'll be getting the Canon R8 with the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 which is perfect for shooting real estate. I would advise anyone getting into real estate to AVOID the 5D miii and the R50. Buy the R8 or any modern Canon full frame with a fixed/fast lens like the Laowa 12mm f/2.8, it's a phenomenal lens on the R8!
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
I listen to modern pros and I wonder how they would have made a living even ten years ago without all the bells and whistles modern mirrorless cameras have in-body to spoil them. The way they talk it's as if no decent images were ever produced before 2018. The 5d mark iii was a top quality pro camera that kept many pro users enjoying fine wine and cigars as a result of it's amazing quality images. You don't need a gazillion focus points to produce iconic images.
perfect
The beauty of camera equipment is if it took good pictures when it came out, it won't suddenly stop looking good when something new comes out :)
Exactly. They just want to press ONE BUTTON and *POOF* everything is colored graded as well.
Pros value higher hit rates in challenging conditions. It's why modern mirrorless are the real deal and now the go to choice. You're right though, it doesn't mean that you can't get stunning images in challenging conditions with something like the 5Dmkiii. Your hit rate will be lower no matter how skilled you are though.
agreed, as former film shooter, I learned composition and exposure. I can shoot on most any body now and find my shot. I've got mirrorless too, love the R line, but I still go back to the 5D for many reasons. To each his own, but I personally know many working photogs that see no point to drop all that coin to get out of something that continues to be bread and butter consistently(including concert/venue shooters). They'll all tell you the same thing....GLASS GLASS GLASS. :) Cheers.
To me, this camera is a keeper. Aside from build quality, great Canon color science, quick focus, two card slots, numerous lens choices, low light capability, the 5D legendary reputation and many more attributes, it is still good in 2023.
Sorry, disagree with the title. Canon 5DIII is Not a beginners camera. Professionals used it round the globe for paid work. Many of them are still using it. It requires quite a bit of understanding of photography for extracting the optimum performance of this great camera.
It is also not a professional camera in 2023 by technical terms. Hence why learning on a full frame could be very rewarding for a beginner. Why have a beginner drop 500-600 dollars on a rebel and get OK results when they can practically spend the same amount of money on an out of date full frame? Building confidence in your shots is very important and this camera could help beginners with that
Yeah this camera is still being used for video and photo...
@@evertking1 this camera offers very little for a professional in 2023
@@MirthFilms if a photographer can not make an good image with this camera "in 2023" lol .. than something is wrong.
Now if your talking video... Than, yeah... I can see that BUT the 1080 outta the 5D3 is beautiful "in 2023"
Thanks and keep at ✌️🕊️✌️
@@MirthFilms, agree with James Cason. Any pro still shooter using R5 will be fully capable to turn out great images with 5DIII as well. In case he fails, it's not a photographer we're talking about.
I'm not a professional, but:
- The battery life is phenomenal
- Low light is amazing in my experience
- Canon colors matter because I hate editing, and resent the idea that I need an indefinite Lightroom subscription to enjoy my craft
- Tough body, unparalleled ergonomics, intuitive dials, meaty grip
- DSLRs are not trendy, so you get a lot for your money
- Viewfinder won't lag, skip, or consume power since it's not electronic
- Dual card slots (CF / SD)
- Good enough AF for me / my price bracket
- Full frame
5Ds are like standard issue military cameras, if that were a thing. They can do the job at the highest level while being versatile, durable, and easy to learn.
Most cameras are amazing, but to me the 5D3 is a perfect machine.
I got mine for $500+ btw, so don't feel like a chump if you can't find one cheaper. It's a highly capable, professional camera.
I'm a professional and use a 5DIII as my main shooter. It's a fantastic camera and I have to agree with you that it does great in low light, though I only own primes which is something that was mentioned in the video. I've done a number of concerts in low light and had no issues with it whatsoever though. I feel like I've had no AF issues either, except for in significantly low light scenarios.
I upgraded two years ago from an original 5D that I had been shooting with for 11 years, so to me the upgrades to the 64 point AF and expanded ISO still feel like huge upgrades to me from what I was used to.
I agree. This camera needs light to lift off the shadows. Pushing the shadows results in horrible noise and banding. It recovers highlights well. Low light does not mean no light in Canon land. Although, being a Nikon shooter is is difficult not to expect miracles from the shadows. I think the man shoots Sony which has a lot in common with Nikon in the sensor dept.,
I just got one of these for my first dslr
I'm a professional and have used the 5D3 for several years shooting portraits and weddings. The low-light capabilities for this camera make reception shots in any venue totally usable at high ISO. The AF worked just fine tracking my nephew his Senior year in high school basketball. Southern Illinois gyms are notorious for crap lighting to begin with, and the camera did everything I asked it to do just fine. . Dual card slots are a must for someone shooting gigs for money. This camera, especially given today's prices, is a true value. I'd recommend this camera to anyone without hesitation. Are there newer, better cameras, available 12 years after this one was made? Sure, but this camera, still more than capable, IMO. YMMV.
This is late but 5dMkIVs are standard in many units in the USMC, if not the R5/R6!
I'm a beginner. I have always loved taking photos preferably of nature as a hobby. I just purchased this with A 50mm lens to start. Great video for someone like me.
I just picked one up for shooting stills in a studio setting and it’s an incredible piece of kit. It’s my first full frame camera and I love it
Canon 5dm3 is better now than it was on release day - it takes the same awesome pictures, it costs a fraction of its release price. If you're not making videos and you're into photography - buy it and spend the rest on the lenses. Lenses are way more important than a camera body.
Yes this camera is just amazing
Not great if you're into making videos? What Canon Full frame would you suggest?
It's actually a videographer's camera. The main reason why the prices stayed so high for used cameras for over a decade is because videographers were installing 3rd party software that unlocks the raw recording option.
I plan to buy a 5d Mark 3 as an upgrade from a Rebel T7, which I bought two years ago. I plan to use the camera as an event photographer for paying clients. I think the camera is "pro" enough, for me.
I would not buy this camera if you are going to be using it for vlogging. It definitely is not “pro” enough for you. If you actually want something decent to vlog(going based off your channel name) get a 6D mark ii. For two reasons, flippy screen and 1080 60fps. Both not available in a “pro” 5D mkiii
@@MirthFilmsBut he said he'd use it as an event photographer? Not a vlogger 😂
The feature film “ACT OF VALOR” was mostly shot with Canon 5d ‘s . They were modified to accept Panavision lenses.
With magic lantern installed this thing is a fantastic movie tool. There are rumours that the ML crew are going to make a full frame build of the ML crop mood for the Mk3. This cam will once again kick ass.
that would be fantastic) thanks for sharing
“If you want to shoot video with this camera in 2024, forget it”
Magic lantern: “hold my beer”
If you manage to find *Toshiba Flash Air SD card* (+app) , you can have wi-fi files transfer in any camera + some additional options (not remote shooting, though, it is reserved for native app only). I own couple of these cards and use them with 5D Classic and 5DIII.
5D classic and SD card? 🤔🤔
@@Dhurbamanchitrakar Easily. Just use CF-SD adaptor.
I'm still doing a ton of video gigs with that and the Mk IV. IMO it's still a great camera for video, as long as you can handle the manual focus and your customers don't want 4k.
In a sense of shooting HD, I fully agree with you! Having the ability to slap on a crispy prime L lens will still create an incredible image. Even with upscaling it
Um the Canon Mark iii is EXTREMELY good at video. That's all I've used it for. It's cinematic just with the standard lens. I highly recommend for video. The only issue is there is no view finder or auto-focus. So if you're planning to do a video of yourself, you'll need an external monitor. Other than that, don't knock it until you try it.
When I went from the 5Diii to the EOS R I felt like the auto focus and general operation of the EOS R was insanely sluggish, like I have never cursed at any cameras as much as the EOS R. Many of the things which can be changed and adjusted using muscle memory on the 5Diii required menu dives in the EOS R and EOS RP (like white balance, for example, or toggling from one shot to servo on the 5Diii could be assigned to holding the DOF preview button but on the mirrorless cameras this functionality requires more time, your eyes, a left hand, and/or a little bit of brain power to toggle). I miss having a straight, even row of dual-function buttons on top of the camera, where I could make changes with the camera at my side just by feeling it-- to this day (after five years of owning R series cameras) I couldn't draw a picture of the button layout on the top off any R series camera, it's like they flicked paint blobs on a body and let those blobs dictate where the buttons would sit. Even the physical lock switch on the 5Diii was a smarter choice than the unresponsive sterile push-button on the EOS R, which requires looking at the camera to know if it's locked, or remembering whether you locked it, instead of reaching for a quick feel with your thumb to be sure. When canon went mirrorless they basically took their M50 and put a full frame sensor on it, and designed a menu and touch screen driven camera for Gen Z kids who don't want to put their eye on a viewfinder and don't know why there are "clicks" on the shutter wheel. I miss my 5Diii dearly. I only keep my R6 because it has a flippy screen, but the colors are hot garbage and it feels like a plastic Rebel in the hand.
I do understand what you're talkin about the autofocus points but you are more critical on the amount of autofocus points but the autofocus mechanism itself works with lenses and it snaps on really fucking fast. Any professional would not mind using this kind of autofocus because it is very Snappy. As a photographer I feel like everybody should learn how to use simpler versions of features. I use just the center focal point point to where I want to be unfocused and then I reframe for my picture and I do that simultaneously really quick and I take all my shots I don't miss the shots. This camera builds good shooting habits. This is why they created the 2 levels of pressure on the trigger. One to lock the exposure and then fully press to complete the capture but that half press is there so you can put your af point on the thing you want in focus then hold it, reframe and then shoot. I have the 6d mark1 and looking to add this because its old but new enough for me to make up for everything in post. But yhats my style anyway i shoot for post editing since im a heacy graphic designer as well. I shoot flat as possible. I just needed something cheap with a great sensor that at at least had the basics.
I don't know how professional photographers coped 10 years ago with all the draw backs you've listed. Seriously, any good photographer or videographer can easily get outstanding results with the 5d mark III if they know what they are doing.
Had my 5Dmk3 since it was released. The thing with the dual card slots is that you can save different formats to each card. I save RAW to the CF slot and JPG to the SD card. Is great when you want to see what you've got before you've sat down and post processed the images.
Nice video but disagree about the auto focus not being good for professional work. Many professionals still use this camera as their primary and the autofocus is more than adequate. Is the mirrorless autofocus more advanced? Absolutely. But 5DIII is no slouch.
I confirm all
I shoot with a Canon 5d Mark ii. I like the "movie film" look to my shots. Also like you mentioned around 1:10, it's a tank and build to last.
I miss my Mark II so much, I wish I'd never sold it. That's why I'm looking at the Mark III but I like the option of using SD cards
Lightroom AI denoise makes this camera a beast in low light now.
Totally agree, canon color science is addictive.
I haven't used the 5d III but I used the 5d II in 2009, I thought the video and photos were very nice from that camera, my complaint was it felt slow next to the 40d that was my main camera at the time. Oddly, I'm still using the 40d but added the original M a few years later so I could shoot some 1080p video. I've been thinking about picking up the 5d iii for its full frame since they are getting into the affordable range. I've shot film for about 60 years too so I can deal with the "old" focusing system.
Does the camera shoot at 1280p and 60fps or not?
And why is there an option for 1280 and 60 FPS?
And you say only 1080 and only 29 frames
Is there a lens that shoots 1280 and 60 fps? Thank you. I hope for a response
I'm considering this body now as an upgrade from my hand-me down EOS 500D. I'm as ametuer as they get, but i'm really interested in trying out a full-frame camera. Was considering the 6D Mark II in the same price range, but the AF is supposed to be even worse on that. Would you say it's still a decent choice a year later, and at what price range? I'm seeing these for anywhere between $650 - $900, which is quite a bit more than what you mention in the video.
Gooood❤
which camera to choose for the wedding party photo between canon 5d Mark III and Sony a 7ii?
Thanks 😊
Do you know about magic lanter? you can record up to 5.7k raw video 12b whith it!
I love mine. I do have issues in low light and the grain does suck because I will up the iso to compensate. I am not a pro though so I live with it. Im looking into Lumix so I can use my Canon lenses on it. The weight is taking its toll on me. Sometmes just walking around I will hold it for 2 - 3 hrs. It is too much, even with a hip strap.
Im keeping mine becuase it was such a symbol of the ideal camera to have. Everyone was shooting with the 5D when I was growing up. Im not sure if it is viable but Magic Lantern Modifications can boost the video capabilities of the camera but its not reliable for professional use.
The Camera should hold up to ML if not overdone.
Great video, I have a Canon 6D and most of my photography is indoor gig/concert photography in low light. The 6D is outstanding in low light with its -3EV and the focus is super quick, and I've even shot at 15000 ISO and got great results. However, I've been looking at the 5D mark III is it worth buying or should I get a second 6D
I'm here to say that it's more than good enough in 2024. I've produced some really outstanding work with it
Doesn't Magiclantern bump the use for video
surprised there was no mention of the RAW video hack from Magic Lantern. Improves this camera's IQ by so much, plus adding a ton of video monitoring features, and even some great photo features like an intervalometer
Anyway you said your opinion from your point of view. But still in 2023 more professionals are using this camera for portraits, events and sports. I agree with no wifi functionality and camera is outdated technology. But still it gives pleasure and results to those professional photographers, not youtubers. And moreover Canon 5D M3 is not for beginner level as per photographers view.
Buy a WiFi card BLM thug
You right
I ahoot with 2 5d3s and make money with it then as a side gig, even got chosen as the third best portrait photographer in my country shooting in a small home studio ordinarie people without mua and stylist like the rest had .. this winter I was on a 1.5 hour photowalk in -44.5f and even tough the menus and everything was lagging I still got the shots . It’s built like a tank
Yes it’s still a good camera for 2024. I still use mine regularly. Not a pro but a enthusiast. I lug this around along with a film EOS 1
I have two. Taken many great photos with them but agree that the auto focus is behind today’s standards. I added a R6M2 to my bag and I’m impressed with the action autofocus. Photographing Flogging Molly again in October. We will see how this stands up to my previous sessions with the band. The venue and light show have much to do with what yo7 can capture. My last concert with them was not so great as there was too much back lighting but one of the opening acts turned out very good. There light show was much move photographer friendly.
We had the mark ii, then the mark iii…and never bothered to go to the mark iv. Over the more than a decade we have used it, the only issue we have ever had is that the little insert on the mode dial got knocked out. It is an absolute workhorse, having paid for itself many times over. Lots of video use back in the day - hundreds of video clients - now we just take stills with it.
U right
As a girl, 5D Mark iii is sooooooo heavy that sometimes I just wanna get rid of it but I still love the quality of the pics took on it. I guess it’s just a love-hate relationship. 😂
Exactly!
I just got a 5d mark 3 for free second hand from my father, I just need to find a cheap lens to start off with and go from there
I love my 5D mk iii
My only complain is indeed about the low amount of series pictures, but rarely use this feature anyways. Noise in low light yes, but Lightroom is very powerful in removing noise which makes it no issue anymore
Hi, I would like to buy a 5d mark iii instead of my 6d classic. Do you think it's a good choice? I would like to gradually start taking pictures of paid work, and I would like a slot for two cards. Also, my 6d only has one usable af point that bothers me... (the center one)
great camera. i bought it in 2012. Several major films and tv shows have been shot with this camera. It's great for both. I subscribed.
Is that an RF body cap on your 5D iii, in the thumbnail? Does it actually fit on cameras with EF mounts?
I have Canon 750 D and i planing to buy 5dmark3. Is it worth switching from Canon 750D to 5D? I do street photography, portarts and concert photography.
That is a great step up Milos! You are going to see a major difference with the step up to full frame
I just picked up one used at a good price! But I think it is geared more towards professional use! Of all the cameras I own, I'm always drawn towards my Canon Dslr's. I think it's their ergonomics and design and ease of use. Thanks for your opinion , and good video!
Paul C.
I shoot basketball photography with this camera Canon 5D Mark iii with Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS III USM Lens. I am a beginner and would like to have your thoughts if this is a good setup? I did get some good pictures using this combo. I am also thinking of getting Canon 24-105mm f/4 IS II USM so I can use this on more close up basketball action. Appreciate your advise and thank you!
Hello, I'm looking to get my girlfriend a new lens for her birthday, which she has the Canon 5d mark iii. Are there any affordable non Canon lenses to avoid with this model or which works with the best for this model? Thanks
Thanks so much great information very much thinking about buying this camera.
Hello, liked your video. i sold my 5d mklll when the RP came out, next bought the R6, but missed the 5Dmkiii. My new to me 5d mklll is due tomorow. bought from Roberts used photo. Can't wait to use it, also can't belive Ifound one with only 6500 clicks on it. Mirrorless is nice but I'm more comfortable with a DSLR. BTW, I don't shoot video.
When I went mirrorless I switched to Panasonic but I miss my 5d Mark II
Thanks for your reporting ! Regards
The 5D Mark III is a great camera...but my biggest gripe is when choosing an auto-focus point, the 'point' is black in color...not red or some other color that is visible in low light situations.
Thinking about getting this or the 5D4 used as an upgrade over my 6D. The upside of the Mark 3 is that Magic Lantern is fully available, while the Mark 4 is a much larger upgrade in terms of autofocus system over the 6D. I have the option of getting a 5D4 with
Not sure what you ended up doing, but I wouldn't bother trading an excellent 6D for an excellent 5D Mark III or IV. 6D is more than awesome for most things and neither 5D model really adds a lot more when compared to other upgrade options out there. I had both the 6D and 5DIII and I used them basically interchangeably. Both had MagicLantern.
For me, in 2024, an upgrade from the 6D would be a mirrorless body. Not sure which, as I jumped away from Canon when they got all possessive about the RF mount, but I do at least like my EOS R. I do shoot a Sony A7III and think its beautiful and works pretty well with Canon glass with an adapter (I use the Sigma MC-11 and find it works fine with both Sigma and Canon lenses). I don't do much of any fast action or video work, so can't comment on how well it handles those tasks.
I'm just going to say, if you think the camera isn't good enough for video, first define what you believe "good" is. Then cross-reference it with the knowledge that House Season 6 finale was shot with the 5DMii...
Not a professional photographer, but please let me know if I'm wrong. People still make amazing photos on cameras from '70, so if you're looking to make great digital photography for not a lot of $ I don't see why this shouldn't be an amazing option in 2023, and also in 2033 and beyond. Video is a different thing ofc due to the recent AF improvements and res requirements.
Very nice video, just want to mention, as bad as this camera was for video originally, once modded with Magic Lantern, it is actually the flagship of cheap quality video camera...For those who are interested just search 5dmkiii magic lantern, you will be blow away
Not a professional but going back to my concert photography passion. Do you think as being a non professional the 6D mark II would be a better option for me than the 5D markiii ?
100 percent. Ive shot national touring acts with the 6D mk ii. A little better dynamic range and it’s helpful to have the flippy screen
For Wildlife is the 5D MKiii a superb camera, like the 7D Mkii. Consider the EOS 6D for low light, perform much better.
I’ve concerts with this camera and my photos were awesome! I guess it depends on the stage lighting.
Can’t deny that at all. The dynamic range makes it tough though.
Hip hop and rap BLM freemason Jesuit pawns love the led 💩 lighting 😂
My perspective emphasizes the importance of the photographer's skills over the technical specifications of the camera, highlighting that true artistry and professionalism lie in the mastery of the craft rather than the equipment used.
I'm tired of reading comments about whether a camera is professional or not. Whether it has a lot of pixels, Wi-Fi, AI to take pictures without the user having to think, or video capabilities. Many iconic photographs were taken with cameras that some would call toys. The fact is, if a camera was professional 20 years ago, it is still a professional camera today. It doesn't take worse pictures than it did 20 years ago. Can any one explain why analog cameras are making a comeback today and why many internationally recognized professionals are using them again? As far as I know, analog cameras don't have megapixels, Wi-Fi, USB, or video. Yet, many are returning to film photography, and many never stopped using analog cameras, such as Andreas Gursky.
A professional photographer has knowledge of photography. They master the basic concepts of composition, know their camera, and can experiment with it.
So the discussion about whether one camera is more professional than another is more a discussion about who has more talent using the camera they have at their disposal.
Harry Casimor deRham once wrote: "remember the ironic fact that the perfection which can be drawn from the within the depths of the human being can never be found in a machine."
What do you recommend for sports?
If you are staying dslr I’d say either the 7D mkii or the 1DX mkiii. If you want to go mirrorless, the R6, R8 or R6mkii
Hello Mirth, a beginners camera? I would say the opposite. All new camera's the camera does it for you. Now a day's people ''does not need to know'' anything about photography. In those day's when the 5DMark3 came out you had to do the job. Someone who does not understand photography could not handle this camera. I used it as a professional for 5 years and another 5 years with the Canon 5DMark2 and I was extremely pleased with it these day's. To take a shot, learn how to focus instead of that the camera does it for you. About filming, with Magic lantern this camera shoots 14 bit Raw 4K footage.
Its is not my intention to offend you, but please be objective.
Cheers Richard
This camera is amazing. I have to disagree with it being bad for video, if you have magiclantern you can shoot 14bit 1080p RAW which looks better than most cameras today, you can easily upscale the footage to 4k and most people wouldn't even notice
newer builds would allow you to shoot upto 5.6k RAW 14 bit now. You need only 2 megapixels to shoot 1080 and 9 megapixels for 4k;)
Interesting and helpful video, thanks
When I started going semi-pro in motorsport I upgraded from a 20d to 1d mark 2. Even the 20d didn't give me too many bad shots and I was shooting BSB, WSB and Motogp. The 1d was pretty awesome for autofocus back then and I can't imagine this being any worse give it came out years later. Oddly enough I've using Sony now and I took some pics of my mate on his road bike, all in focus all bang on. Gave the camera to him to shoot me, pics are all garbage and some nowhere near focus. You can't let the equipment do everything. You need some skill.
Go to Canon 5D Mk 11 they are cheap and will allow you to stay in focus while panning till you press down on the rest of the button and 6 shots will rapidly take place in seconds staying in focus just use 1,250 speed as some experts on You Tube told me, It is sad that the later Canons were lacking when compared with the Mk-ll I am not an expert, but I manage to get the job done, THANKS CANON! Mk-II
This is a wonderful video thank you 😊 🙏,hey can you please do a video about the 70-200mm f2.8 non (is) in 2023
You Got it!
@@MirthFilms Would be helpful if you can also add in some sample pictures just like in this video and maybe give a few tips and tricks on how to get the most out of it and Thank you very much i really appreciate your effort, it's not easy putting up these videos because they consume alot of time and require alot of effort so thank you for these videos
@@trustdixon2053 just made the script! Should be out in a week or 2
@@MirthFilms thank you 😊 🙏
Six frames per second is good enough for sport, nature or action. People were taking great photos with 5f/s Eos 5 35mm SLR. You don't really need more.
Very helpful! Thanks!
Failed to mention Magic Lantern firmware. Wow. Really? Why?
This video make me temped to look at this camera and so I check it in my country and my god it cost 1200 dollars converted and even for mark ii it cost 700 dollars. Good video nonetheless so good job.
Buying this for a back camera, is it worth it?
Yes
Thank you! Can you share the website where you got it from?
@@marienelson3242 FB Marketplace
@@MirthFilms thank you! 😊
MagicLantern is compatible on this camera, which is a huge win.
This is a horrible review. This guy obviously knows nothing about this camera. It's no where close to a beginner camera. There's a reason most real professional photographers/videographers still keep these in their fleet being how amazing of cameras they are. And it "takes horrible video " those are definitely lies. You obviously haven't heard about magic lantern either. There's pros filming 5k raw with these things and it looks almost better alot of the 4k cameras currently out right now. Go look at Jannis kalinski and quite a few others vids filmed with these cameras. Do a lil more research and actually learn how to properly use a specific camera before dogging it dude..
Funny how these youtubers are out here talking bad about these DSRL cameras yet back then they used them they got famous coz of these cameras
It’s got a Bluetooth adapter for downloading photos
Long time Canon user, and now a Sony A7III shooter. Your review is spot on. The low light on the Canon can't touch the "older" Sony. I should sell all my Canon gear while it's worth something, but I still enjoy it.
I remember the big hype about this camera 10 yrs ago was the film look videos . Now its not recommended for video period.. dam
Thank you Frank I’m thinking of selling off my 5d mark ii for the mark iii or mark iv
No problem’ if you are doing only photo, get the mark iii. If you need to do video get the iv or even EOSR since they are technically the same camera in some ways
@@MirthFilms I’m doing both video and photo but it seems like my ii is lagging behind when I’m doing weddings that’s why I was looking at the iii or iv
There is literally no point in switching from 5dm2 to 5dm3, for photography. Have a great day.
Why don’t you get an SD-WiFi card?
Bruh you using Sony what do you expect and that Camera even 5D mark II is still good til today em for event and professional shooting you need just to spend more time knowing it and studying it and def great in low light!
The main thing I love about the EOS 5D is how fake the photos can look, especially the very vibrant landscape grass field photos that had been taken on that camera.
hi i find that the canon 5d mk 2 does what the mk 3 dont do does movies! at 20.1 mp great camera for me but just do landscape fof fun parks etc tom
This is a wrong review canon 5d mark iii is a professional camera and it shoots 4k
In line with this interesting video; Sony A1 is also a great beginner's camera for people with deep pockets!🤣😁😂
You don't recommend the 5D Mark iii for video ?
I know a crap ton of film makers who used this camera for some of the most beautifully shot short films I've ever seen.
I'm sorry but saying this camera is not great for video is insane to me.
I was part of 2 films directly using the mark iii and it provided amazing results.
Unless your on a budget, I’d rather tell someone to look at a GH5 or even a low cost EOS R. They are much more friendly to videographers where this camera lacks a lot of important features
@@MirthFilms With Magic Lantern this camera is beast for video.
A real professional can make professional photos with a relative cheap camera. It's maybe not as convenient but composition and proper and correct lighting has very little to do with the camera. It is only when you really blow up the photo very large that you might see the difference. Of course the camera manufacturer has to improve to keep the profits going and selling all the 'positive' points to you as if you can't do without those improvements but general speaking it's not the camera itself but the photographer.
Relax people this man is a blogger not a "Jason Lanier" just let him do what he does..
I left Canon after I sold my 6D. With panasonic now cannot go back once I tried IBIS
💥💥💥💥💥💥 looks great!
Add the magic lentern
This camera is still experience in my country
I think you can shoot music videos with that
I would have to disagree that the 5D Mark III is a good beginners camera. A much better idea would be to buy something a little cheaper and save some money to buy glass. The 5D Mark III is still used by professionals and it is still relatively expensive for most beginners. If a beginner wants a 5D a better option would be a 5D Mark II or a 5D original.
You can get one for under 500 .ffs
Or even a 6D Mark 1
@@oadefisayo that one kind is bad in comparison
orthe 550D or 650 flip screen for 200€ with lens same as 5D
@@hdj81Vlimited those are APC?
Get a decent skill level with this, and I think it's a professional camera. It is Heavy.... I loved my 5DII, thought Fujifilm was the way to go, but I want to rugged camera that is hard to break, for watersports photography.
This is a stupid statement. There are many pro who still and will use 5D
Never said this isn’t a pro camera. It definitely is but it came out over 10 years ago. I would not tell professional to buy one in 2023, hence why it is an affordable way to get into full frame if you are a beginner
I bought a 5D MK III in 2017 and literally never used it; not once. In fact it stayed in its original factory seal in my storage facility.
When the C-19 epidemic struck I left it sealed in storage because my studio was closed.
I, again literally, used the camera for the first time since buying it in 2017 and the image quality was absolutely amazing. Even with the included kit lens.
It's definitely a professional piece of equipment and it's still just as relevant in 2023 as a more expensive mirrorless camera.
If you still not using it, I'm from a third world country and appreciate if you could give it out, I don't mind paying you little by little
@@aniebochisom Bruv, I was tasked with using it for the 1st time at a funeral in 2023 and I have fallen back in love with photography and videography.
The 5D MK III is a phenomenal camera and I'm going to keep using it.
I know you use what's available, but I'm not a supporter of cell phone photography. If you can, find a cheap, used DSLR with a decent lens.
This is the only camera that is for only smart people until last one is in operable 🙂
I'm only using this Canon 5D miii with the 17-40mm f/4 lens because of a company I work with, otherwise I would never use this darn thing! I don't like this camera and lens one iota. It weighs a ton, super clunky and doesn't take great pictures and no 4K video. Also has very poor low light performance, super noisy in dark locations, and the AF is a joke, I have to do everything in MF in order to take photos. This camera is an absolute workflow killer, hard to believe this is a full frame camera. I'm selling my Canon R50 because that too has distortion and vignetting issues because of the crop sensor coupled with a subpar Nisi 9mm f/2.8 lens. I'll be getting the Canon R8 with the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 which is perfect for shooting real estate. I would advise anyone getting into real estate to AVOID the 5D miii and the R50. Buy the R8 or any modern Canon full frame with a fixed/fast lens like the Laowa 12mm f/2.8, it's a phenomenal lens on the R8!
I have aquatica a5d under water housing for that camera for sale with dome glass cover $1500
interesting video
Whoa there buddy 5dmark iii is great for video. 4k is still not the standard yet. And we know the legacy history for video on the mark 3
It is great for the sole fact that you can swap lenses. Other than that it is not fit for professional use in 2023