Civilization VI Great Scientist Tier List
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июл 2024
- Get the tier list here: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
Today we're talking about the Great Scientists in Civilization VI! I'll be going over the various great people and ranking them in correspondence with their effectiveness, so stay tuned for more!
We have a community discord! Join us on it at / discord 
Игры
![Veeze - F.A.F (ft. Rylo Rodriguez) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7hlz2S2GmIY/mqdefault.jpg)
“I need to fix [spelling] libaray” *spells it libary* “there we go”
Its a big brain move I guess XD
The Saxy Gamer very large brain
Emgineers are bad at speeling. I should know.
@@TheSaxyGamer where is Nikola Tesla he is extremely good
My rage when someone else gets Hypatia or Isaac newton
Or Einstein
automatic casus belli
Honestly they really did Alan Turing dirty in this game, just like the Brits really did him dirty in real life.
Jokes aside, maybe a buff to him would be 1 extra diplomatic vision in all civilizations you are at war with? (because of his role in breaking the enigma code and stuff)
Him being possibly the worst scientist is enhanced by the fact that he overlaps with the engineer Ada Lovelace, who also boost Computers, and her another skill is far superior. So if you got Lovelace, Turing is almost completely useless. And boosting Computers isn't that hard anyways, though sometimes you will want to rush it to get flood barriers (why is it unlocked by computers btw?).
In all my games when I recruit Abdus Salam I find him absolutely useless, as at that point I have already researched everything from the Informational Era.
I've got “get 5 eurekas in one turn” achievement thanks to him, but this was only one time I used him.
I would argue he has some nice uses. On a deity game where you are focusing solely on 1 science victory, on a map of 11 other deities, science and G.Scientists go fast. He helped me complete the tech tree that littttle bit faster on my way to research laser stations. Because the future era is ALWAYS random, he has use in at least getting a better chance to find the tech to help win
There is a phrase that eurekas are random, but you can reduce randomness by getting eurekas that you can get by self. Just don't use scientist as soon as you get them, wait until the moment when easy to get eurekas will be triggered already. Yes, it adds a bit of management, but you get a good science progression in return, so this worth it.
The thing is, on deity you need to beeline the important techs, and ignore inconsequential ones until they become prerequisites later in the game. And at that point you finish the leftover techs in 2-3 turns anyway, regardless of if they are Eureka'd or not. The best you can do is remember if there are any Eureka's you're currently working towards (like building a University next to a mountain, or a second University, or a certain Civic that would give a Eureka is currently being researched), and delay activating the GS for a few turns.
I think janaki should be moved to a 3. If not a 2
At that late point in the game, you are likely chopping rainforest as you mass settle. On top of that, 400 sci per tile isn't that much. It might help you a bit but everything costs a good deal then.
Get open borders and send her on an expedition to Pedro or Kupe or someone else who hasn't chopped their rainforests. Janaki can see up to 7 tiles, as opposed to Galileo who sees 5 at most or Darwin who sees 4 at most (2 or 1 max on some maps). I agree with Saxy Gamer on Janaki's rating
I agree with most of the rankings I might put Abdus Salam as a 3 since I find a lot of the Eurekas are harder to get later in the game and it provides a eureka for all of the techs which will save a lot of time compared to the other scientists which just give you a random couple eurekas
Carl sagan insta builds the exoplanet expedition so the 1 charge is not a big deal
Yeah, definitely worth rank 5 imo. Combined with the engineer Korolev you can surprise your competition in pvp. If another player got Kwolek and seems to be leading, everyone will try to bring them down. Then you just push through two of the 4 buildable phases and snatch the victory. Provided nobody realized you got Sagan and/or Korolev.
That is of course if your pvp goes that far before someone wins by domination. Still great ones in pve as well though.
Another thing with the eureka scientists is that (especially later on) you will have boosted or even researched all if not most of the techs from the scientists era, depending on how much science you have and how many great people everyone else is earning.
So some of the scientists are literally one good for 1 era score for recruiting them late on, so don’t be afraid to pass on some of them
Maybe you could tackle this by going the other way. Take a Victory type (like Science) and make a video what great people are usefull to that victory. Because from a players point of view you don't align your strategy to what Great People you can get, but you try to get the Great People that serve your desired victory type.
you can get 1500 from sending Darwin to Galapagos Islands. Not only is it pretty decent, it's also thematic
Great Barrier Reef gets you a silly return too
There's and achievement for doing this
Thank you for these! More tier lists would be awesome!
Add a column for notes. That way you can include the win condition type. Will be especially important for culture and science victories.
You really shocked me when you said you do not know who Euclid is. However, you did a good work on breaking down the great scientists. Thumbs up
Good video mate
You should probably put asterisks/comments on Mary Leakey and Hildegard in case people use the sheet only for reference. Otherwise, nice list!
Yeah, it's really difficult to give them a static ranking when these guys could be a 5 in culture and faith games, but then a 1 in other games.
Food for thought: regarding the new tech/civic shuffle mode, I think Eureka scientists really get boosted for being able to reveal a tech's location. I actually had Alan Turing save some coastal tiles from early flooding (everyone and their damn soothsayers burned the ice caps before it was even the industrial era) thanks to him revealing computers and letting me b-line it instead of probing for it.
This is helpful thanks! But pointing out that you misspelled library but didn't change it immediately slightly triggers me.
It's even funnier that he changed it at 9:05 and it was still wrong LOL (no hate tho, video is great)
You should state what the eureka for chemistry, mathematics, and computers are. Some eurekas are hard to get. Others are easy but kind of orthogonal to the strategy you are following. Having the boost for free and having it NOT be random can be powerful and this wasn't even discussed in this video sadly.
Mathematics has a very very easy eureka. Build 3 different specialty districts. That is something you will always want to do, it's just a matter of time. Thus a great scientist boosting it is really bad. Computers only requires a tier 3 government, or maybe a tier 2 government with a bunch of wonders to boost how many policy slots you have. Again something you always want to do it's just a matter of time. Bad use for a great scientist. Chemistry wants a level 2 alliance, which might be the only one you don't decide to get.
The other downside of boosting a specific technology is not just getting the boost on your own, but just researching the technology on your own. If you see chemistry is getting a level 2 alliance and that you won't be doing that, you'd want to just research it quickly because that's a very useful science tech. Then 20 turns later you get Mendeleev and he's almost completely useless.
Unfortunately, a lot of stuff was not discussed in this video which is disappointing because this would've been the best avenue to do so. Like another example of something not being mentioned is Maria Leakey, and having the ability to snatch her up before another civ does that actually is using relics and tourism for a culture victory - even though you aren't. Letting a culture civ grab her for free could potentially lose you the game. It's situational of course, but so is all the Great People.
@@orangesilver8 Honestly, I've started feeling getting the boost on Chemistry naturally is as much a guarantee as Mathematics. If I'm going for a science victory, I intend to have multiple alliances with the AI as a means of deflecting the need to spend as much on my military. Computers is the one I've found to be less certain, as if I'm really crushing it with science production, it's possible I've done so at the expense of my culture production, and I might be nearing Computers before a Tier 3 Government. Even in a Domination victory, I've found the higher difficulty levels means I need alliances so I'm not fighting the world all at once.
I Love Your Content Thanks For the Info
Great video Saxy! Just one question, does Stephanie Kwolek's bonus apply to the one city she's activated in or to all spaceports?
Great vid thx!
Great video thank you. Please do one for spies.
One thing to note about Hypatia, Newton and Einstein is that the bonus is applied before the Rationalism modifier I believe. So Einstein is effectively +6 or +8 to every university.
A thing to keep in mind with later eureka producing Great Scientists is the ever increasing probability that you've already snowballed and hard researched the specific tech already.
With: Obsunur Hollow, Pantanal and Sahara El Beyda you can get 2000 science with Charles Darwin so i would bump him up to a 4
chocolate hills also
I would say Darwin is a 1 maybe a 2 at best because I don't see why you would build your campus next to a natural wonder to begin with.
@@delob9271 you don't have to activate darwin on a campus
@Brian Loer yes i forgot
Hey I suggested this in a stream a few months back
I think a bit of analysis would be good on the scientists that give random eurekas vs the ones that give straight science. For example if 3 random eurekas from an era is higher than around 1000-1500 science then they are closer to equal. However the straight science can be more predictable where it is applied, so still a little better.
Mary Leaky is probably correct to rate as a 4, but not because she is a 4 in culture and a 1 in science victories. She is like a 7+ on a 5pt scale in culture games.
Abdus Salam is easily a 1, you'd have to try hard to even get him and have more than 1 eureka to trigger.
As a math teacher, your struggle with Euclid hurt me deep.
It gets worse, I'm an engineer and I still have no idea what the actual correct pronunciation of Euler is XD
@@TheSaxyGamer oh god, it's oiler, please tell me I was quick enough for the great engineer vid
@@TheSaxyGamer oh no
In multiplayer the space race guys are insanely good. Can't tell you how many times someone in a game I'm playing has won with them while being destroyed by another player.
I don't often go for Mendeleev, but he's periodically very useful.
The thing about Euclid and Turing is that the specific eureka they provide (Mathematics and Computers) are two of the easiest eurekas to get in the game, and I'll either have either already activated the eureka or will about to activate it. So basically, they're only providing 1 Eureka.
Mendelev's Chemistry I think is just a wee bit harder to get, just because the AI can be difficult to keep friendly enough to get a level 2 alliance. It's still bad, but not as bad.
first. love your content!
So, Abu has this regen bonus, which I believe also applies to religious units. In this case, I believe he would be way better, since it would be the only way to heal religious units in enemy territory without a guru
I feel like the 20 extra great people points bonus is decent for a culture victory considering you end up getting a lot of great people so 20 per person adds up.
The g in Bingen and Shroedinger is the same as in ring or sing.
i think Salam doesnt deserve a 2. ALL eureka is pretty damned strong. obviously its stupidly strong if you get him early in before you have already earned a bunch, or even flat out researched to completion. but even if its not optimal for your benefit, it can definitely be high value to just simply deny it from the ai. even if you are 10 or 20% ahead of them on science per turn, if they instantly wipe out the need for wasting time and production chasing those eurekas, and cutting all their research costs by 40%, they would start seriously giving you a run for your money.
id give him a 3. hes clearly got obvious situations where hes stupid strong or stupid weak. but most situations, hes a solid choice.
In a science victory, you're often one turning all the techs at that point anyways, so the eurekas just don't matter. In any other victory condition, you don't need any of those techs to win. He comes too late to have any real impact, I would rate him a 1 actually.
lol ok bud, you are right, you are going to be 1500+ research per turn before you enter information era tech. sure thing my duder!
sit down, clown. nobody cares about what you are doing in settler difficulty, custom rigged maps, or cheat modded games. this discussion is about legit deity games.
I think you kinda misunderstood Alfred Nobel's effect, if I'm correct it gives you 20 Great People Points for every great persons, which means for instance if you grab one great scientist, you start the following one with 20 GSP right away. I also thinks it works when someone else grabs one, though I'm less sure of that.
Still not crazy good, but still better than 20 points once.
I tend to find now and again a great scientist does nothing for me because I didn't check if I already had all the eurekas for the era.
The only tier list series on the internet that has rank 1 being the worst tier. No one has ever said "this guy is really bad, let's give him rank/tier 1."
I would give Alan Turing at least a 2 because he's a key part for naval domination strategies, since these tend to rush the upper part of the science tree, including Computers to avoid losing half their cities, while getting the Bombers early in the game, and boosting Computers via the culture tree is not gonna happen in this situation.
Some changes i would make.
1. Aryabhata and Euclid might actually be slightly better than you rated them since they'll also give you the eureka for Education (~150 Science) aswell. If you play a bit around recruiting them you can probably get ~400 Science from them. Thus i would consider them rating higher.
2. Downgrade all medieval Scientist by 1 tier. Simply because Newton or Galileo are so much better in comparison that you dont want to miss out because you got one of them
3. Emilie Du Chatelet down to Tier 1. Being in direct competition with Newton and Galileo mean you would probably rather pass on her to get one of those.
4. Downgrade Darwin by 1. In your average game Darwin will be 1k Science. While he provides utility to make a timing push for a specific tech to get a wonder him only giving you barely enough for a modern era tech just isnt enough.
5. Ammal down a tier. Again you risk missing on the big scientists of Sagan and Kwolek in order to get an expected value of 1.6-2k science which is basically 2.5 information era eureka worth of science. Difficult to judge tho. As the first Atomic era scientist she would probably rank in tier 5 for me.
6. Downgrade Salam to tier 1. Again the direct opposition is the problem. If he is the last one left you probably lost the science race anyway.
Thank you for this it is helpfull.. i do nfp broke civv6 further , but that is no more than my personal opinion.. both on steam and console i must say i am disapointed with it.. well they will think they got my money twice for the w😀😀😀🤣hole lot in both versions lol
make a Religious Belief tier list (for each category)
I'm shooketh... the idea of picking my victory when I start playing never occurred to me. I just sorta start the game and go with the flow and react to the AIs around me
you usually decide on the victory condition the moment you choose your civ leader.
Sometimes the game takes you elsewhere, but that's only if you're so far ahead you don't care.
Almost 100% agree with all of the rankings! There are only two maybe 3 I would personally change a little bit, Sagan in my book should be a five especially if you build your last space mission in one or two turns is absolutely disgusting and the other two I don't feel as strongly about. With both Omar and Aryabhata I would argue that they come early enough that maybe I would give them a 3. (Aryabhata more so than Omar) Just cause they can end up changing the way you play that entire game if they give you the one or two things you might be missing! Later I totally agree that they kinda suck. D: Definitely getting a like!
Edit: Side note, Einstein and Kwolek should get a 6/5 for being so good!
Double Edit: Comments changed my mind, Abdus definitely deserves a 1. Lol
I'd bump Erwin S. to a 3. The techs he gives Eurekas for have a lot of "only from Scientist or Spy" and at that point in the game, if you're leading Science, you're not gonna be stealing Eurekas from the AI. I generally find him more helpful than the earlier ones is what I'm saying.
i think Alan Turing deserves a 2 since you can plan to use him once most of the techs you have left to boost are the ones that need to be boosted through spies or great scientists and these go unboosted in almost all my games, maybe that's just me being bad about using spies but i never feel bad about getting Alan Turing.
If you can get both hypatia and newton relatively fast you will snowball out of control really fast.
I feel like Hildegard should be bumped up to a 4, because even if you aren't going for a faith game, faith is still useful and building one or two high adjacency holy-sites goes a long way. Plus you get some faith back and a good amount of science. I used to pass of her in non-faith games, but now I just make sure to get up a relatively early high adjacency holy site.
They should make Einstein build all 3 science buildings and give +4 to Research Labs instead of Universities so he mirrors Hypatia and Newton
that'd probably be even more bonkers xD thats what, 3000 gold worth of infrastructure? even abit more than that actually, 3200 gold. that'd be even more game-swinging than he already is.
can abu al-whatever, the healing one also effect religious units?
I generally agree that the random eurekas gs are weak--the game seems to funnel the eurekas towards the lowest tier techs you haven't eureka'd/researched yet, too--but in the case of Schrodinger, you're starting to hit techs that can ONLY be boosted by GS, spy, and late game tribal villages if you're lucky, and I felt that should be taken into account.
Abdul Salam should be at least a 3... but very nice video, tks!
I died when he said great scientist
Great Prophets tier list next plz
Zoroaster>everybody else
You should do a natural wonder review
He already did
Does hypatia and the others that boost libraries and or universities also for all future libraries and universities built? Let's say you use hypatia, does every library you build after also get the bonus?
Yes
I’d give Alan Turing a 2 or 3 at least. It’s so annoying when you play a culture game with coastal cities and aren’t even close to reaching flood barriers in the tech tree - especially when other civs are producing CO2 like there’s no tomorrow😭
I think the father of the periodic table should be moved up. Although not especially useful, the eureka for Chemistry is one that you actually need for your win-condition, because it allows you to build labs, which is really good, also it leads to Rocketry, which allows construction of Spaceports.
You said since Mary Leakey is good for culture victory you'll give her a four, but when you are considering her in a culture victory context she's obviously a five. She's practically a must have for a culture victory.
not really, I wouldn't say she's a must have by any means. Yeah she's great if you can get her, but chances are you're never going to see her. It's super hard to generate scientist points if you're going for a culture victory, since you're so busy with scaling production and gold and great work infrastructure (ie theater squares and wonders). Chances are she'll fall in the hands of the boys going for science victory.
Tourism victories usually end up scaling extremely hard with the powerful tourism multipliers you get from wonders and late game civics/techs, and seaside resorts, so it's not like it's worth it to drop the production of those wonders and builders to dedicate some campus research programs towards being able to faith or gold purchase her, I'd say in most cases.
ok new here, but what if we get eurika from scientist and also do task which gives eurika will we get free reaserch/double eurika.
sry for spellings.
No, if you unlock a Eureka through a Great Scientist that boost will already be unlocked and you won't be able to get it again. Same for Inspirations, and same if you find a Eureka/Inspiration in a Tribal Village.
I did domination today i got abu al quasim and i used him all game on with the same warrios from turn one and it legit never died i won a domination game with the same og warrior from turn 1 that i just upgraded and made into corp and army and promoted a lot it was so close to dying multiple times i used abu al quasim all the way until supply convoys he is so good for domination easy 5 just for that and the only other troop i had was the catapult that i upgraded and promoted a lot with great generals you dont know how useless it is to have multiple troops in domination just upgrade the same 2 all game
Great
Neil deGrasse Tyson (Info era) should be one of the Great Scientists that you can bid for in Civilization 6. I'd bet that there already is a mod in Steam that would add him to the list but that wouldn't be necessary for 7 if he was included in the vanilla version.
Conversation: What would his superpower be? Keep in mind that other players, including AI, could outbid you if they have more GPP/gold than you -it should be impossible to buy him with faith- so we don't want to give him too much game-breaking power. Given his passion for inspiring younger generations to become scientists, my first idea is he would add ALL buildings not built yet INSTANTLY to a Campus district he is standing in, with 2 charges so that he can do it twice! While smart players would send him to new Campus districts that don't have any buildings so that they get a total of 6 free buildings, the AI would likely send him to where it already built Universities and get only 2 free Labs.
His alternate power only in Gathering Storm could be a one-time severe reduction in global carbon emissions and even reverse one phase of climate change! The immediate effect being unflooding the most recently flooded tiles but each player would have to repair districts & improvements the usual way. Since that would benefit every player in the game, using him this way would grant the player who had him a huge bonus of diplomatic election points (not Victory points directly but enough to buy Diplo Victory one election earlier). I would love to read other superpower ideas if you have any!
Stephanie Kwolek (and to a lesser degree Carl Sagan) is great on paper, but they arrive far too late in the game. In my recent science victories I never even unlocked them before the exoplanet expedition arrived the nearest star and I won. She should really be an Atomic Era GS at the least. The ones that do help a science game are the Great engineers however. Sergei Korolev IS an Atomic Era GE, and adds 1500 prod to a project (which is nearly enough to instafinish one) and with the mausoleum of halicarnassos gains 2 charges over Carl Sagans 1. Thats a LOT stronger for a science victory than Sagan/Kwolek will ever be. Sagan/Kwolek are better for finishing space projects when you are NOT going for a science victory and want to just launch a satellite or moon landing in the very very late game.
Great.
13:30 You forgot the umlaut (ö) over the O. It makes a sound that doesn't exist in English (making an E-sound with your mouth in a position to make an O-sound).
13:50 /dʒ/ In Indian names, J makes its English sound.
Nobel got buffed to 100 points. He’s pretty ok now.
I think the +20 HP of Healing for Abu Al- is only a one shot deal,
when you retire the great person. Note that it says +20 HP of healing for all within one hex.
It's a passive effect, which means you use him like a great general.
It's booth. 20hp is pasive effect. Only one hex makes it difficult to manage but it's pretty strong
The one that heals 20 hp per turn is freaking godlike man. Off course he's not that good if you go fo culture/diplomacy/religion but in all cases, if you're really focused on these types of victory there's a chance you're not getting a great scientist at all unless you buy it with gold and faith anyway. And in case you play defensive, this man makes your army almost unbreakable on home territory so... Not my fav great scientist neither, but a goddamn awesome great general in every game.
I think your focus on the Science Victory condition was a bit inconsistent. For example, you decided to give Mary Leaky a 4 due to her Tourism benefit, even though that only helps a Cultural victory -- but in science-focused game she is unlikely to generate more science than Charles Darwin (who got a 3). Al-Zahrawi is totally useless for a science victory, but his benefit for a Domination (or even just an early war) can be easily greater than Leaky's.
If I can make a suggestion, I would really like to see each Great Person get two scores: one for their standard victory type if applicable (Science for Great Scientist, Domination for Great General and Admiral, not sure about the others), and also a score for the person's best victory type. Would you prefer Al-Zahrawi in a game with strong Domination or Hildegard in a game with strong Religion?
Janaki Ammai rating are wrong. He comes at atomic age and usually very late game. Most of rainforest are chopped and hard to come by if at all. Also at best 1600-2000 science at that point are not many turns as you often create around 400-600 pr turn, meaning 4-5 turns saved. Basically the same as a late game eureka. I say he is a 1 or perhaps 2 if we are being nice. If he came in a earlier age he might be more viable.
You forgot Ada Lovelace and if I'm not wrong, it feels like you missed another one.
Nevermind, just realized she counts as an engineer haha.
No Great People in Ancient Era? That's a shame!
Adam and Eve should be there. As part of Creationist science :D
@@antondzajajurca7797 It's from the bible, not in this game.
*Writes libaray* I need to fix that *proceeds to write libary*
Give this guy a manual, what are you doing?!?
wow you're the first person to point that out, good catch /s
Btw my in scrodinger the I is an e sound
After watching this, I kind of fee like most Great Scientists are weaker than some of the other potential great people. There are a few really good ones but overall they all seem to be fairly underwhelming.
Merchants, Generals, Engineers and Admirals are all better.
This is kind of conteracted by the fact that campus spam is a lot more frequent for human players than perhaps other gpp generating districts. So at the end of the day they often have a higher presence in games compared to other great people just because you are more likely to be ahead of the AI on this front. I think this is a good balance because if there aren't so many mediocre eureka ones science victory or science focus might be a bit too strong.
Hypatia, Newton, Einstein are very strong for science victories, as are the ones that complete space race projects. Mary Leakey is the most important great person for a culture victory. Hildegard is incredible with certain civs that can get huge holy site adjacency (Russia, Mali, Brazil, Australia mainly, but also Japan to some extent). Abu al-qasim is very good if you go for a knight timing push. All the other ones are weak or situational I agree.
Carl Sagan Is a 5 imo. Agree with the rest.
It's incredible to see how many are really crap
Hmm, I’m conflicted on this. He’s brilliant but Stephanie Kwolek is better. He’s also inferior to his GE competitors because of the Mausoleum. If Stephanie had already been taken I’d get him instantly, but if it were a choice between him and an equivalent great engineer for instance (which I’ve seen a few times thanks to the AI being slower to churn GEs than GS) I might patronise the GE and skip him to try for Kwolek. Then again you might not want the AI to get him so... yeah.
What’s new with work ethic?
It now gives production in holy sites equal to their adjacency bonus. Combine that with some of the new pantheons which do stuff like +1 holy site adjacency from tundra, and you can really easily get 4+ adjacency if you just spawn near the top or bottom of the map. You can then double that with the policy card (I think it's called Scriptures).
Thanks!
But the tundra pantheon (dance of the aurora) is not new
*Libary*
Potato McWhiskey would disagree with you on Mary Leahky. And so do I. You might want to build one or 2 Theatre Squares, even in a Science game, because you do need some culture (for Civics like Space Race for the ISS card), and Artifacts are much easier to get in a Science game. And she deserves a 5 for a culture game.
Also, you'll have artifacts even in a science game just to get rid of those useless Antiquity Sites. Sometimes, I WISH some British Archaeologists would come and steal my cultural history, just so I can actually build things.
Hildegard not being a 5 is a mistake. At least right now it's incredibly easy to engineer Holy Sites to be +10 or even +20 faith. She is at least on part with Hypatia even with a more conservative Holy Site imo. You play religion into science specifically for her and for some of the other bonuses like Jesuit Education.
At this point, if you can get +10 holy sites, Work Ethic just breaks the game in half, so religion is a no brainer to push for. +10 production in the ancient era is just ridiculous.
If you embark Charles Darwin on that 2 tile pink lake natural wonder that gives adjacency as well, then he has 6 adjacent wonder tiles. Still, very situational 😊
More tier list contents please!
The people who disliked are just mad because they don't play Science Victory
Janaki is an Indian name. I didn't realised that because nof the name butchering! 😂 (I'm Indian)
Its pronounced as Jaa-n-key
Lol I absolutely hate Hildegard of Bingen.
4:35 why can't you get 15?
The card you use doubles yields, so it has to be even. The game I'm playing atm has a +9 adjacency bonus, which doubles to +18. Combined with work ethic and Bingen that's +18 Faith, +18 Production and +18 Science from a single district. Also, you aren't going to get +15 adjacency, before applying the cards 100% bonus.
Mary leakey should get 3, Carl Sagan should get 2, Abdus Salam should get 3. Your rating overall was very good though! Thx
Carl Sagan (for a science victory) is extremely useful, one time I got beaten by one turn in a Civ game, and because I didn't get Carl Sagan I lost he is extremely powerful.
@@loganeid5342 oh, well i guess that could be true. I used him once on the light year thing, and wasted him. If I use him on the lunar or Mars projects, he becomes better. Yep I guess hes op
@@alial-fatlawi5565 dang this is the first time someone actually changed their opinion on the internet thanks for being open minded ;)
Darwin can get 2,000 science from Pantanal
That's a lot of science!
i disagree with abdus salam, also others can go for science great persons espioacicly domination tog et the higher strogner untis and hesnice for them
Need to add Stephen Hawking to the game
Spelling mistakes in the description of Newton and Einstein, arguably the most important names in physics like ever. Shaaame :p
I feel like i was born in the wrong generation. I only play civ 5 and I don't like civ 6 but when youtubers made civ 5 content i was like 12,13 and didn't watch youtube at all
and long story short, that's one of the reasons why i'm deeply dissatisfied with this game. some stuff is really really good, and you want them all the time, some is just worthless trash :-/
do the same about the policy cards and you'll see every thing is just "if you do that, those five cards are what you need, the rest is garbage". i particularily despise the cards that are just updates on the previous era ones. ugh.
Im so triggered by how you just said fucking Meme mate
Do writers
Saxy upload a 3 second shitpost saying all Great Writers are good do it you won't
Oh I've got an idea for those ones...
@@TheSaxyGamer uh oh
Great Prophets too tbh
You misspelled Dmitri Mendelejew.
Also Al-Zahrawi should get a 4 or 5 for Domination.
wtf