@@Cyclistmagvideo may I ask how tall and inseam is the tester? I'm 1.80m and 87.7cm inseam and I get an M size recommendation, but not sure whether an S would be a better fit... Thanks in advance for your help!
True, the original rim-brake Aeroad was lighter as an overall build. What I meant is really that the Aeroad's weight has come down to what we expected from aero road rim brake bikes. Personally I've long-since been a disc brake sceptic, but bikes like these have really changed my view. The braking is, ultimately, so much better, and the costs are increasingly small - perhaps just 100-400g. It's not always easy to articulate these things on camera in a sentence or two. Hope you enjoyed the video otherwise! Peter | Cyclist
@@Cyclistmagvideo I'm also a disc brake convert - all my bikes have disc brakes but I'm quite happy to accept the 500g or so weight penalty as a result. And yes, I did give your video a like :)
@@Cyclistmagvideo And it would be reasonable to mention at what speed you could potentially save those 4 Watts, otherwise it doesn't make sense, does it.
Considering the main commetition is bikes that are over 10k, it's by definition more affordable. Maybe not affordable for everyone, but at least MORE affordable than the others. Plus, you can get these for 3-4k aswell in lower trims.
I don't understand where they saved weight if you remembered the last aeroad cf slx was 7.1kg with duraace & the lightest cfr is 7.26kg how on earth they managed to add weight after 4 years of development is just laughable.. Also that's cfr durace weight.. Cf slx which we should compare(which ofc is stagnated this year) with with last gen is far more heavier.
boogiexx 4 minutes ago only tarmac isn't aero bike so you're comparing apples and oranges ---- if you want apples and apples canyon ultimate CF evo Disc 10. SL is 650 g lighter then Tarmac SL 7 ... and 3 to 4 k cheaper ....
@@boogiexx I would say that the Tarmac compares better to the Aeroad than the Ultimate, with its shallow climbing wheels, exposed cables and basically not an ounce of aero to it. A better comparison would be with the new Specialized Aethos.
How comfortable is it compared to a non-aero bike?
What size is the bike that is being reviewed here?
Hi Christian, Peter is riding a size M in the video
@@Cyclistmagvideo may I ask how tall and inseam is the tester? I'm 1.80m and 87.7cm inseam and I get an M size recommendation, but not sure whether an S would be a better fit... Thanks in advance for your help!
hi guys , l just see , that canyon aeroad cf slx 8.0 di2 2021 now is a little expensiver than 2020 ???? why ??? the same bike
measure - bottom bracket center top saddle? 78 cm? 80 cm?
size frame please ?
Seat post issue. Wearing down after 100km. Major design flaw and can’t see this being resolved without redesign and recalls.
Hi. Where did you learn of this?
Is this the SL7 killer? Only time will tell.
Indeed, we'll be interested to see!
I keep reading that the frame is lighter, but the complete bike is heavier than last year's version?
You are right. The whole bike with Dura Ace Di2 and disc brakes is heavier than the previous generation. The question is: Why?
So it's amazingly fast if your head on into the wind. What happens if you're not?
Then you BECOME the wind and you're still fast.
what bottle cages are those
How much is it broo? :))
You lost a bit of credibility when you said there was no weight penalty to having disc brakes on this bike.
True, the original rim-brake Aeroad was lighter as an overall build.
What I meant is really that the Aeroad's weight has come down to what we expected from aero road rim brake bikes. Personally I've long-since been a disc brake sceptic, but bikes like these have really changed my view. The braking is, ultimately, so much better, and the costs are increasingly small - perhaps just 100-400g.
It's not always easy to articulate these things on camera in a sentence or two.
Hope you enjoyed the video otherwise!
Peter | Cyclist
@@Cyclistmagvideo I'm also a disc brake convert - all my bikes have disc brakes but I'm quite happy to accept the 500g or so weight penalty as a result. And yes, I did give your video a like :)
@@Cyclistmagvideo And it would be reasonable to mention at what speed you could potentially save those 4 Watts, otherwise it doesn't make sense, does it.
Allan Phillips thanks!
Boy that seat post sure has cost alot of controversy. Hambini tells the truth about the matter.
£7000.... "a lot more affordability" 😂
Considering the main commetition is bikes that are over 10k, it's by definition more affordable. Maybe not affordable for everyone, but at least MORE affordable than the others. Plus, you can get these for 3-4k aswell in lower trims.
I don't understand where they saved weight if you remembered the last aeroad cf slx was 7.1kg with duraace & the lightest cfr is 7.26kg how on earth they managed to add weight after 4 years of development is just laughable.. Also that's cfr durace weight.. Cf slx which we should compare(which ofc is stagnated this year) with with last gen is far more heavier.
Too heavy vs Tarmac SL7.
boogiexx
4 minutes ago
only tarmac isn't aero bike so you're comparing apples and oranges ---- if you want apples and apples canyon ultimate CF evo Disc 10. SL is 650 g lighter then Tarmac SL 7 ... and 3 to 4 k cheaper ....
@@boogiexx I would say that the Tarmac compares better to the Aeroad than the Ultimate, with its shallow climbing wheels, exposed cables and basically not an ounce of aero to it. A better comparison would be with the new Specialized Aethos.
@@alvinmarin8648 The Ultimate has way more areo shapes than the Aethos, dude.
The aerodynamic is ruined by disc brakes...
*your riding position
Aethos makes this bike seem unnecessary..
The Aethos is substantially more expensive and designed for a different purpose. Apples and oranges, dude.
Goose comment