The bulk of the flex that I felt was while holding the drops, regardless of setting. Riding on the hoods felt great. For 98% of riding, I don't find that flex problematic.
@@bobbylea8961 Many thanks for the reply Bobby. This really makes a diference for us that just cannot try the bike. 2 more question if you have the time. 1) The geometry is basically equal to the ultimate (in the highest setting), but in terms of confort is it really noticible? 2) Is it also a big deal between 50mm to 62mm? I guess so.. Background: I'm really making a strech to go for an aero just because of the cockpit integration. Probably a mistake...
@@bmmaia81 I haven't ridden the Ultimate so I can't say for sure. In terms of overall comfort while riding, I found the Aeroad to be middle of pack. It's not the most compliant aero road bike out there, but it's certainly not a jarring ride. Tires help a lot with that as well. It has a 25mm front and 28mm rear, and Continental GP 5000 tires aren't the most supple tires on the planet so you could squeak out a bit more comfort with a lighter tire. Regarding rim depth between 50 and 62, absolutely that will make a difference. Smaller and lighter riders may still struggle to control 50mm rims on windy days, but as a big rider I find that depth easy to work with in the wind. Here's what I'll tell you about cockpit integration: In terms of aerodynamics, it's a clear benefit. In terms of fit, integrated cockpits can be a real bear if the stem length and handlebar dimensions (drop/reach) don't match what you need. The new Aeroad is better than most since you can adjust bar width, but in this case you're locked into the bars produced by Canyon. In some other cases, there is some flexibility to use aftermarket bar/stem combo's. Also, the integrated look in undeniably clean. Hope this helps!
Just got my cf sl 3 weeks ago i can definately notice the bike is faster espcially when my previous bike isan all around and yes i get blow around in the cross wind could be from the 62mm wheel i was on a 50/55 mm on my emonda but overall a great bike to ride
@@michaelkarstel3542 ; i think canyon suggest a smaller frame. I am also 6.2 and (almost, it’s xmas..) 180 pounds. Canyon website suggests a L-size. I currently have a canyon endurace size L and it suits me fine. But now i am in doubt which size to order. My preference is always smallest possible, so still go for L.
Old thread I know but I'm thinking of getting an Aeroad and I'm 6'4" 170 lbs, 35 inch inseam so more of a longish torso. For 14 years ridden a 07 Tarmac 58cm with no issues, at least that I can compare to. Should I get a Large Aeroad or go with XL?
@@666Dejmien666 I’ve heard they had solved the issue with seatpost ! As for the other issue with handlebar I am not aware as to what degree the bike could potentially become difficult to handle! But thanks for your comment, it helps as I am currently shopping around for a big deal with an aeroad! :)) Maybe january will bring another discount! 😎 However your statement: read the comments does not bring enough proof for me to consider the issue is real.
It's a pretty cool design and a unique answer to a problem that's inherent with these integrated cockpits. Time will tell in terms of how it performs over time. Keep an eye on the new Aeroads that Canyon's WorldTour riders use for clues. If we start to see the bar disappearing from their bikes we may have our answer.
@@michaelkarstel3542 I'm wondering that as well. It seems like XL is on the larger side for 6'2". I'm almost 6'4" and considering between L and XL. I prefer to go for the smaller frame size if I can.
Canyon doubled down on "aero is everything" with the new Aeroad CFR. Did they take it too far, or not far enough?
I appreciate the honesty of bicycling mag reviews
Great review, thanks. But just to be clear, the cockpit flexes if extended, or even if in the shortest setting?
The bulk of the flex that I felt was while holding the drops, regardless of setting. Riding on the hoods felt great. For 98% of riding, I don't find that flex problematic.
@@bobbylea8961 Many thanks for the reply Bobby. This really makes a diference for us that just cannot try the bike. 2 more question if you have the time. 1) The geometry is basically equal to the ultimate (in the highest setting), but in terms of confort is it really noticible? 2) Is it also a big deal between 50mm to 62mm? I guess so.. Background: I'm really making a strech to go for an aero just because of the cockpit integration. Probably a mistake...
@@bmmaia81 I haven't ridden the Ultimate so I can't say for sure. In terms of overall comfort while riding, I found the Aeroad to be middle of pack. It's not the most compliant aero road bike out there, but it's certainly not a jarring ride. Tires help a lot with that as well. It has a 25mm front and 28mm rear, and Continental GP 5000 tires aren't the most supple tires on the planet so you could squeak out a bit more comfort with a lighter tire.
Regarding rim depth between 50 and 62, absolutely that will make a difference. Smaller and lighter riders may still struggle to control 50mm rims on windy days, but as a big rider I find that depth easy to work with in the wind.
Here's what I'll tell you about cockpit integration: In terms of aerodynamics, it's a clear benefit. In terms of fit, integrated cockpits can be a real bear if the stem length and handlebar dimensions (drop/reach) don't match what you need. The new Aeroad is better than most since you can adjust bar width, but in this case you're locked into the bars produced by Canyon. In some other cases, there is some flexibility to use aftermarket bar/stem combo's.
Also, the integrated look in undeniably clean.
Hope this helps!
Bobby Lea super many thanks. If you stop by Portugal, the beer is on me!
@@bmmaia81 Deal! My brother has been there but I never have. Looks gorgeous!
Thanks man i can't waite to have one
Great honest review!
@Bicycling I'm 193cm. Do you think I would fit on the X? Have you got room left to raise your seatpost?
Just got my cf sl 3 weeks ago i can definately notice the bike is faster espcially when my previous bike isan all around and yes i get blow around in the cross wind could be from the 62mm wheel i was on a 50/55 mm on my emonda but overall a great bike to ride
Excellent video.
DId your CFR Di2 came with the new DTSWISS wheels. 20mm front and new hub?
At 6ft2 180 pounds did you find the XL was the right fit for you? Could you have gone a size smaller?
@bobbylea
@@michaelkarstel3542 ; i think canyon suggest a smaller frame. I am also 6.2 and (almost, it’s xmas..) 180 pounds. Canyon website suggests a L-size. I currently have a canyon endurace size L and it suits me fine. But now i am in doubt which size to order. My preference is always smallest possible, so still go for L.
@@Stevenafoe thanks, think I’ll stick with the L then! 👍🏼
@@Stevenafoe Same size same concern after reading the comment. Committed to a large.
Old thread I know but I'm thinking of getting an Aeroad and I'm 6'4" 170 lbs, 35 inch inseam so more of a longish torso. For 14 years ridden a 07 Tarmac 58cm with no issues, at least that I can compare to. Should I get a Large Aeroad or go with XL?
I was ready to purchase and was told it would be sometime in the fall (US).
This bike is one huge disaster.
@@666Dejmien666 why?
@@dcristian969 Read the comments. Very common problem with seatpost and some problems with the handlebars.
@@666Dejmien666 I’ve heard they had solved the issue with seatpost ! As for the other issue with handlebar I am not aware as to what degree the bike could potentially become difficult to handle! But thanks for your comment, it helps as I am currently shopping around for a big deal with an aeroad! :)) Maybe january will bring another discount! 😎 However your statement: read the comments does not bring enough proof for me to consider the issue is real.
Chainset size is on the warwind 3.0
What helmet are you rocking? Cheers
What about the EPS version? Is it worth the extra penny?
how is it on climbs? comparable to tarmac sl7 or more aggressive?
I haven't ridden the SL7, but relative to the SL6 I'd say it felt comparable.
How does the comfort compare to the old Aeroad?
Those handlebars seems problematic (not safe & will it lose stiffness over time).
It's a pretty cool design and a unique answer to a problem that's inherent with these integrated cockpits. Time will tell in terms of how it performs over time. Keep an eye on the new Aeroads that Canyon's WorldTour riders use for clues. If we start to see the bar disappearing from their bikes we may have our answer.
Hi. Could you please tell me your saddle height. Centre BB to top of the saddle. Thanks.
My saddle height is 78cm from center of bb to top of the saddle
May I ask what size aeroad has been used in this review?
Bobby tested the Aeroad in XL.
@@BicyclingMag with Bobby being 6ft2 and 180 pounds, did he feel like the XL was the right fit or could he have gone a size down to large?
@@michaelkarstel3542 I'm wondering that as well. It seems like XL is on the larger side for 6'2". I'm almost 6'4" and considering between L and XL. I prefer to go for the smaller frame size if I can.
did you weight the xl size ?
The XL Bobby rode weighed in at 16.25 pounds.
@@BicyclingMag thanks
What's the frame size?
Now my dilemma is the outgoing Venge or the Canyon Aeroad hmmmm
Fortunately it came with the problem with the seatpost
Size XL?
Yes!
Seatpost cracking?!
I like the previous model better.
.......Comfort?
"Stinking" the new word for 2021?
First commentator
Does anyone care?
all i know is that this bike is stinkin'
Thanks for the review. But please stop saying “stinkin” - it’s a silly term and detracts from the quality of your video.