Terrence On How Neil DeGrasse Tyson Shunning His Research | Joe Rogan & Terrence Howard
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
- If you like what we do, please feel free to support the channel through the link below.
☕www.buymeacoff...
Terrence Howard is an actor of stage and screen lauded for his work in "Crash," "Iron Man," "Empire," and "Shirley," as well as a musician and researcher in the fields of logic and engineering.
Host: Joe Rogan
Producer: Jamie Vernon
Episode: 2152
Full Podcast here: open.spotify.c...
Follow Our Socials
/ universityofjre
![Natanael Cano - Amor Eterno [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EO4prCs6WpM/mqdefault.jpg)
NDT actually responded to this and showed his actual comments on the papers. He was quite courteous. Terrence is lying and coping hard here 😂
Neil was SO kind to do that for him! He treated him like a colleague when he's not even close, he's like an annoying person you ran into at a party that became a janitor when you became a doctor and they think they know how to do surgery.
Idk if terrance every been to college or something but neil did nothing wrong, exactly how you peer review 😭
And we're supposed to believe him on the Iron Man story?
@@blackdynamite_5470 yeah once they loose credibility it’s hard to trust them with their stories. Specially someone as loony as Terrence 😅
@@markt8517 Hes probably been ON a college campus before if that counts? But no, his "college degree" is one of those honorary degrees they give to famous people who come speak at graduation.
The Dunning Krueger effect is strong in this one! 😅
As with all Joe Rogan fans.
Did you know what that was before you watched the Tyson response?
@@prolificballers8744 If so, he chose to run with/use the new knowledge vs exposing his bruised ego & telling big lies. 🤷♀
Terrence Howard: the guy you wish you had not started a conversation with at a party
I've been there. Unfortunately, Terrence Howards find me at the supermarket completely unprovoked while I'm trying to buy cereal.
Only if you have the intellectual depth of a bottle cap
You don’t even know what he’s talking about, sacred geometry, the flower of life, and how the ancients the ancients used different mathematical systems that made more sense, your the dude that nobody wants to talk to cause you think you know everything and believe every piece of dogma you’ve been fed, if only you were intelligent enough to leave the herd. Go have some drinks and stay off this side of you
Terrence howard needs to focus on acting and leave the drugs alone
@@TheAutumnWind_RN4L i think the grocery store is the worst, its already quiet and now this person is having this awkward azz convo and I just want some cocoa cocoa puffs....
Terrance is a tropic thunder character
This is so fitting. 😂
He's a " rooster illusion "😂
It's a bummer. He had everything delivered to him on a silver platter. Got paid an insane amount of money to have kind of a bit role in Iron Man. Could have rode that if he just didn't go so nutso.
He went full retard
He is Robert Downey Jr character’s mentor….aka Lincoln Osiris
Some JRE listeners are seriously not bright. This is not even about education. Simply illogical and complete gibberish for 3 hours unchallenged.
Yea... this guy is just not right in the head. It's a little worrying Rogan can't pick up on that.
The audacity to die on the hill of 1×1=2. Everything out of his mouth after that, instantly tarnished. He wants to comment on Feynman diagrams yet lacks the mathematical ability of a 5 year old. Amazing!
It’s not even about being bright. It’s a mix of ego and insecurity that leads people to CHOOSE to believe ridiculousness so that they can feel better about themselves and smarter than us “sheep” who are too dumb to see the “truth”
@@meowtheroflearning2320i think he knows he’s incorrect, this is the longest version of “Let Him Cook”. 😂
I wouldn't be surprised if 90% of jre watchers now think Neil is a deep state operative and 1x1=2.
Would not be surprised one bit lol
When do you guys get that people don't watch JRE for education but entertainment? It's so weird that people think commenting shit like you did, makes you somehow smart
If his mind is blown by multiplication, imagine what dividing 1 by 1 is gonna do to him
It’s -2….. obviously lol
Lol
😂😂😂
Man you just imploded the universe. I gotta sit down.
Then once I sign down I'm gonna sit down again, which is how I stand up, which is why one of us can get up.
That's actually possible tho and makes sense. You can divide 1 number in half.
Dont trust anyone who puts headphones over a hoodie
Good way to ignore his words by focusing on headphones
I think smart move you don’t know how dirty those headphones are he keeping himself clean and not dirtying the headphones
Dumbest shit ever
Hahahaha!!!😂😂😂😂😂
Don't trust anyone who says not to trust someone on silly unimportant things 🤷♂️
These are the kinds of videos that will keep schizophrenic homeless people busy for years. Terrence is very lucky he is a good actor.
sadly
I literally am schizophrenic and up until recently was homeless for roughly 5 years. And you’re not wrong. The 1x1=2 is obviously just him playing with semantics. Makes me wonder if all the other more technical stuff he said is the same semantic games but because it’s shrouded in a scientific language most people don’t speak it means it’s harder to spot the flaws. You’re right though I actually want him to be right about something. He seems really OCD or autistic. However crazy geniuses do exist. Maybe he’s got like one thing right but that one thing is worth it for all the noise.
@benwoods5616 maybe, but I'd say a broken clock being right twice a day doesn't make it useful. I'll give anyone who has earned some credibility the benefit of the doubt but until Terrence has applied his mathematical theories in a revolutionary way in the real world or actually demonstrated his new flying technology I'm going to assume he's just kooky.
@@flashpointprdx That John Nash guy the film “A beautiful mind” was about had a lot of delusions as well and he discovered game theory. Of course that doesn’t mean every paranoid schizophrenic is a genius. And I know what you mean about a broken clock but maybe it isn’t the best analogy because sometimes that one time it’s right is very useful. Sure most of John Nash’s beliefs were destructive to his personal life but in the end his discovery helped mankind. I realise obviously there’s a degree of wishful thinking on my part because I’d like my schizophrenia to be good for something! But that doesn’t mean it isn’t. People play different roles in society and some people’s job is to be narcissistic and crazy because it takes a degree insanity to think in ways other people won’t and a degree of egomania to even attempt to discover something world changing. I just hope it’s not a lottery and that there are ways in which every schizo has benefit even if it’s not game theory.
@@benwoods5616Tell me the signs of your schizophrenia and how it correlates with Terrence
Kanye vs. Terrence debate in "Survial of the mentally illest " Would do numbers.
Illest 😂😂😂
This guy is a manifestation of every time our childhood minds got angry that we couldn’t solve a problem on a math test
Terrance, meet my friends Dunning and Kruger.
Terrance Howard sounds like every Joe Rogan fan that takes JRE too seriously.
Neil degease Tyson did the right thing.
And gender fluidity is real science 😂. Clown world
I'd go further and say he didn't do the right thing, he did the KIND thing and critiqued his paper as any colleague would do for him...i say he did him a kindness because to call Terence a colleague of Neil is plain wrong, they're NOT on the same level at all. You could say Neil is a wise old man speaking to a 5 year old questing for more knowledge in his infancy.
He did the SELLOUT thing
@@jimmorrissey1028 how so??
Neil was quite courteous. However I feel he should have allowed the conversation with Howard. Both may have come to some further understanding of the others position.
Now i understand why Terrence got dropped from the Iron Man Series
Top tier JRE "intellectual" talk right here.
Dr. Joe and Dr. Terrence breaking it down for us. Thank god for intellectuals. Where would the world be without them? If they'd pair up and put their brains together maybe they could get Neil DeGrasse Tyson to tell them to STFU.
Don't do too much drugs kids
Jamie didn't even need to fact-check anything on this episode. 😅
yes.he did. but he didnt.
Jamie thought: rule #1 dont insult the guest...
"Yep, everything checks out Terrence"
Yup, he barely pushed back, almost nothing. Yet when he has somebody who is deeply knowledgeable and keeps up to date with most things in science , like Neil, he’s extremely skeptical and asking lots of questions
Joe will buy into anything.. huge kiss ass. Terrence is so delusional. Neil just fact-checked all his slander. Mic drop baby.
Jamie was eating popcorn 🍿
What if conspiracy theorists don’t really exist 🤔
Church yo
What if celebrity scientists like Bill nye and Neil degrasse Tyson were always an absolute joke and should've never been taken seriously
@@4dstellatedhypercube558Bill Nye isn’t a qualified scientist
then who made conspiracies?
@@GwladYrHaf Then he shouldn't be treated like one.
Two, divided by love, can only leave One, and One is the loneliest number.
Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one
I feel really bad for zero then.
@@thanosdoomjuggernaut2846 Zero is two lovers that actuated a suicide pact. Romeo + Juliet = 0.
Is that you'll only do 😂😂😂😂😂
B4i4q Ru > 18 Qt3.14?
This is what happens when your dealer tells you to just take one and you eat the whole bag
I wouldn’t smoke or drink nothing nothing he on lol
😂
If you do a little research he's actually been working on this since he was a kid. Quick question. Take Terrence off of the table. Is it hard to understand that math is merely a concept. However when you apply that concept to physical space the physics does not add up. For instance, in reality, negatives does not exist. It only exists as a concept of mathematics. If I have one phone and you can only take that one phone. It is not possible for me to ever have a negative amount of something. I can't physically hold a negative amount of anything in reality. I can never have a negative amount in reality, but in math and on a piece of paper as a concept you can have a negative amount. However in reality physically, literally, can you ever hold -1 phone in your hand?
@@comeagyn I find this statement by people like you that believe Terrence very weird. You say it doesn't work while living in a world that is based on that very maths you say doesn't work. Is something wrong with you people 🤦🏾🤦🏾
@@Joshua-dc4un
Nah bro I'm starting to think there's something wrong about us for not being crazy enough.
This is like watching professor Kanye.
LOL- perfect description
@@Chris-is1rdforeal 😂 this guy believes his own hype.
Or Katt Williams....meow
Kanye was right
You guys are so lost. Lmao omg how are u even watching this Greatness.
Error 404 - Brain not found
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 best comment here! By far
Which one? Yours?
@@tshaolin971 may be…
Terrance Howard has definitively decided the chicken came before the egg. Wow. Well I guess the debate is over .
😂😂
The fact that you’ve never seen an egg fertilize itself just says you’re not open to a creator as a possibility. Not that you’re intelligent.
Actually the dinosaur came first. The T-Rex is a genetic ancestor of the chicken. They share much of the same DNA, until they diverged a very long time ago.
This brother is bat shit crazy for sure but there's no debate on the chicken and the egg; ovocleidin-17 (or OC-17 for short), is only found in the ovary of a chicken, leading to the suggestion that the chicken must have come before the chicken egg, since without OC-17, there can be no chicken egg formation.
@@jaegerschtulmann execept that chicken had to be born first, which means the egg that hatched the first chicken came first.
The difference between genius and stupid is stupid has no limits.
Terence Howard literally telling people what Albert Einstein left out is wild 😂 gotta be Kanye in a mask I’m not having it hahaha
When you multiply any number by 1 the answer is the number itself not multiples of the number. 1x1=2 has to be the dumbest math statement ever
Your right
Maaayneeeee!
Naw mayne
You’re missing the point bc you’re on a lower plane from tech probably.
He’s pointing out the contradictions using semantics.
@@ianhinz-vt9bg "division means to divide something can not be divided and still be the same number, if it is then it was never divided." Terrance Howard on dividing by 1.
I believe some controversial things, but Terrence Howard is a smooth brain
Lolol
Like a balloon
About as sharp as a bowling ball.
It actually makes sense what he is saying
Listen to the entire episode. It's very interesting.
I wish I could find the critique of Terence Howard’s work by NDT. I read Terence’s work and it was riddled with grammatical mistakes and logical fallacies.
logical fallacies? hahaha... you're high.
@@c3swift well, I can give you one example he made on the Joe Rogan show. He compared our bodies to the universe and proceeded to draw conclusions based on that comparison. That is a false equivalency. Do you agree that that is a logical fallacy?
@@dolam you trying too hard fam. this is a JRE clip... no one needs big words like phallacy... and we definitely aren't over here looking for logic.
@@c3swift lol, ok. Have fun living in intellectual darkness.
@@dolam k.
imagine being 40 years old and not being able to understand that if you take 1 one time you get 1
He's 56
The sentence 1 × 3 means starting from zero, 1 is to be added three times. This equals 3. The sentence 1 × 2 means starting from zero, 1 is to be added two times. This equals 2. The sentence 1 × 1 means starting from zero, 1 is to be added one time. This equals 1.
Exactly. The number of times to be added up. One, one time, is one not two. I’d be willing to bet that two times one is two and three times one is three. I even think one million times one is a million, but by his logic maybe it’s a million and one. Joe Rogan has really encouraged critical thinking lately.
isn't 1x3 starting with 1, then the x indicates the function of multiples, 3 being the number of multiples of 1? where does the zero factor in?
Yes you are absolutely correct. The sentence 1 x 3 simply means 1 is to be added 3 times. I used the starting point zero to illustrate what this looks like on a number line. On a number line, starting at 0, we are to move 3 times in the positive direction. But the command 1 x 3 as you described is exactly right.
@@Maintainingabadtrip 😂
The point is, you're not starting from 1, that is in the sentence. 1 X 1 or 1, 1 times. Interesting in the comments. People are programmed to assume that the mainstream person is always right. This has never been the case. I am at least willing to be open to the possibility that Terrence is right in this case. It certainly makes sense. Neil is never open to anything outside of conventional mainstream science. He was one of those saying that Tesla Motors was going to fail, because the battery is a flawed model. He was absolutely wrong about that and had to eat crow and ended up buying a Tesla. Never assume that the mainstream consensus is always right. This has never been the case in our history of human civilization. Giadano Bruno is a case in point, as is Nikola Tesla.
Nice to see Rogan giving time to someone who, intentionally or not, demonstrates the negative consequences of drug use.
But Joe seems to believe Terrence, what does that say about Joe Rogan ?
@@sevencostanza3931 Maybe that he can act.
Ironically joe suffers those same negative consequences of drug use 🤷🏽♂️
Ah, Joe Rogan. The guy who smokes weed and talks about DMT at every opportunity.
The drugs give us the ability to understand it😂
He came at Neal like he came at Skinny Black with the mixtape on Hustle & Flow 😂😂
💀💀💀
@@INNIMA🥶😂 LOL
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This might be one of the greatest comments I’ve ever read!😂🤣
It's hard out here for a math genius
I've been following Dr Tyson for many many years he is an educator and that's what I need at my old age because I love everything science my brain does not work on the level of most top scientists and that's what separates Dr Tyson from the wrist he's not a teacher he's an educator and he even reaches down deep in his gut to teach me things on my level❤
Sometimes if you bang a tv really good, it works again .
Unlike maids
That's just science.
This needs more likes lmao
I'm wondering if this is the result of a psychedelic trip, bipolar mania, or if it's just how he is? He's clearly convinced of himself and no one can talk him out of it, even in the face of undeniable proof, which are all signs of psychosis.
Nope its jsut to complicated to fully grasp and hence why modern science has stayed the same because our technology is not there yet to make a diff, heres a little idea of what he is syaing, Imagine you have a coke can and you had a device to multiply objects,you set it to 1, in theory the device would replicate the coke can thus 2! Its simple algebra you must make two equations when the variable that multiplied when not fully simplified.
He had scandals in the past. After that, he created this fantasy reality where he knows secret knowledge, and that's why they tried to take him down with scandals.
He's a narcissist and drug abuser. Typical methamphetamine delusions. Being watched and followed. Phone is bugged. 5 days without sleep you start unlocking the keys to the universe.
It's pretty clear that he's a narcissist with a drug habit and doesn't get enough sleep because of his drugs, which attributes to the psychosis he is experiencing
@@ARCHCOMPOthat’s the dumbest statement I ever heard. 1. **Understanding the Function**: When you input a function that multiplies by one into a device meant to replicate objects, it essentially means that for every item inputted into the device, the device will output the same number of items.
2. **Effect of Multiplying by One**: Multiplying a quantity by one doesn't change the quantity. So, if you input one item into the device and apply a function that multiplies by one, the device will simply reproduce one item as the output.
3. **Repetition of the Same**: Regardless of how many times you input items into the device and apply the function that multiplies by one, the device will consistently replicate the same number of items as the input.
4. **Effectiveness of the Device**: In this scenario, the device effectively does nothing in terms of altering the quantity of items. It simply reproduces the same number of items as the input, making it seemingly redundant or non-functional for this particular task.
In essence, using a device to replicate objects and applying a function that multiplies by one would result in the same number of items being produced as the input, rendering the device ineffective or redundant for altering the quantity of items.
Modern science has stayed the same 😂😂😂 energy cannot be created nor destroyed it can only transform the state it’s in. Math is a language that is crucial to understanding the laws that govern our universe. But how can anyone begin to understand it if most are illiterate in math. 😂 you cannot just redefine mathematics without significant proofs that have existed for centuries proving something as fundamental as a^2+b^2=c^2.
Jesus the condescension. I am not saying the dude is right. But can't he just be questioning things, comes to his own conclusions and just be wrong? I mean psychosis?
Our infatuation with celebrities, allows this guy to be heard even though he makes no sense. It’s like a 12 year old trying to prove he is smarter than everyone else to get attention.
Five once is five
five twice is ten
ONE ONCE IS ONE
ONE TWICE IS TWO!
You’re part of the problem with your real math etc.
If you have 1$ and times 1$ to 1$ how is it NOT 2?
0 x 1 = 0, 1 x 0 = 1 // 1 x 1 = 1 , 1 x 1 = 2... there are two sides of the math table. They only tell you about the inverted side. 1 as an identifier stems from you can't multiply non existence so if something is 0 it can't exist in physical space so its of indeterminant size but could have an infinity small mass therefore 1 x 1 = 1.. but that's only of you first start with the negative side of the spectrum 0 x 1 = 0. We have all been fooled by a mathematics sleight of hand. Thus in nature 1x1 = 2
@ghostsballz I see what you mean, I think that the word "times" is the issue in that multiplication problem.
@@D809GNo, cos that’s not what he’s saying - 1 of something multiplied (increased) by itself (1), is 2.
That is not the same as one INSTANCE of something which is just 1.
The point is that our understanding and use of math doesn’t equate in universal law; zero - meaning nothing - cannot be a state of anything if everything is in motion..
Terrance sounds like randomly homeless guys I meet in the subway.
You sound like the dumb child at the back of the classroom…
Even Einstein wasn't appealing in looks, hell not any scientist or inventor to ever create something was appealing to look at so what does looks tell you? That they are just a mirage.
@@bensonselebogo2768sounds like and looks like are two completely different phrases
He is. Some dipshids just gave him a pedestal for no reason
@@fica1137 but are they? You have been blinded by Big 0, if you open your mind you too can understand how1x1=2. Once you understand this you realize you actually have 4 eyes and 4 ears, those "extra" eyes and ears help link our senses together (draws a bunch of circles) see how they overlap? The senses bleed into each other thus opening you up to the Terryverse! Your ears can actually see, your eyes can hear all senses open up and then you are ready!
1 1 is 1. 2 1’s are 2. A child grasps this concept.
11 was a racehorse
21 was 12
111 race 21112.....
sorry couldn't help myself.......
🤭😝😉
did you miss the point? 1 is not a multiple, it is singular.
You certainly do. Some humans are so far behind they think they’re winning
NFS that’s what had me stuck. The idea of 1 times 1 is simply 1 thing multiplied by its presence. 2 presences of 1 would equal 2. A half exists to split a single. A half can multiple twice to reconstitute the whole but a whole once isn’t more than one. Right?
Imagine the multiplication symbol means "group of" and you have your answer.
This bloke is an absolute idiot trying to sound smart.
He's practicing for a new movie role. IQ (2025)
People: A+B=C
Terrance: Why not AB? C cannot just come into existence because of A or B, and if you multiply A and B, why not F, you know what I mean?
No.
😂😂😂
"Under what condition it's illogical ?" under the conditions of logic I guess.
Logic is not bound to physics
Should learn laws of logic before thinking uk logic. It's either sound or not sound. That's logic
@@eddydeathwishe4638 Schizophrenics aren't bound by logic either.
Once he starts wearing sunglasses with that hoodie, he might start putting homemade devices in mailboxes.
Bro is pimping mathematics
Lmfaooooo
This is the Longest version of “Let Him Cook” I’ve ever “tried “ to listen to.
Narcissist,everyone else doesn't know what they're talking about about but him,he's the one with all the hidden knowledge
Or maybe you are just too dumb to understand
Maybe he can teach you how to write correctly.
Exactly. Dude is just a narcissistic maniac. Being a rich actor isn't enough for his ego so he creates this world where he tries to be some kinda genius but all he does is spit word vomit.
😂
Why so threatened and triggered?
Man... when he was talking about the grand unified field equation and said "dude, I've done it. I've got it here" .... I couldn't stop laughing. Poor guy...
Why do i have a feeling that he’s not telling the whole story ??
Really? Do the math! You have 1 you want to multiply it, key term "MULTIPLY", "ADD TO". Don't do what you were programmed to believe, think, use your brain.
Example. You want to multiply the cars in your driveway, you currently have 1 car, you get a second car you now have 2 cars. You physically multiplied the vehicles in your driveway to now being "2" not 1.
@@bernardhfox buddy, the Algebraic definition of multiple is different from the one you use in ordinary English. The definition is :”obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times.”
@@bernardhfoxThat would be multiplying the one car by 2 then. You can't just juxtapose two words and claim they mean the same thing. Words mean different things for a reason. If you want to express in mathematical terms that you've increased the cars in your garage by 1, you would say that you ADDED one car or MULTIPLIED your car by 2.
You got watch the whole thing
@@carlion3rip535 maybe I will for a laugh.
I’ve had a conversation with many Terrence Howard’s. They were all high out of their fucking mind.
Neil doesn't have time for Terrence Howards nonsense.
Sure he does. He spent a lot of time debunking it.
If you multiply one Terrence Howard times one Terrence Howard you end up with zero.
Neil’s version of events is more convincing by far. He did a peer review, rather than accepting the “education” Terrence was offering him as facts.
Reminds me of how flat Earthers think. And why it is so hard for them to understand gravity, and that air pressure is a gradient into space, so they have to introduce a dome to say it is contained, but don't realize if the Earth were contained, the air pressure would equal out as you cannot have a pressure gradient inside a container. 🤦♂
gravity is buoyancy
@@dan8910100 Only to uneducated children, lol.
@@dan8910100 Gravity explains buoyancy
When you have one, one time you have only one. This guy is crazy.
Respectfully, I don't think anyone in this comment section understands the context. You have to understand that him and Mr Tyson disagree on how multiplication should be viewed or used. Everyone in the scientific community believes that multiplication does not apply to physical nature but is simply used as a way to measure. Howard believes that everything in the universe including multiplication should abide to the laws of physics. Hence, from his POV 0 x 1 cannot be 0 according to the law of conservation which is a basic principle in the laws of physics. 0 x 1 has to be 1 or else what happens to the energy? But remember he disagress with how multiplication is used and that it should be abide to the laws pf phsycics. If you think about things from this perspective, i think you can humor or indulge him on this perspective. This would entail rethinking how we even are hardwired to think about multiplication.
I'm not saying I agree or he is correct but it is an interesting thought .
Finally someone else that gets it
How do you get up from your bed? Surely it must be too complicated for you
Zero is a null place holder. Absent of +/- value.
@@op3nsignal174he is incorrect and it is not interesting
Terrance howard has liberated me from being the worst at math
Remember guys, the entire concept of being an actor is pretending to be something you're not.
all it takes is some google search and u can see what he has done, but ig ur slow
@@erraticentertainment"ig ur"?
He literally proves what he's talking about. Give it two years till you see his products
Why is he wrong?
People calling him smooth brain while he literally put in some work to get to where he's at. He's swimming up stream to let us all know we're the ones not in symphony with life itself.
“Mom! The teacher said I got my answers wrong! He underlined my mistakes in red!”
A hustler (Neil) knows another hustler (Terrence) trying to hustle in on his hustle. 😅
Square grand hustle theory gram
Exactly. Two smooth talkers 🤣
Neil is a scientist. Big T is... Well I don't how to describe him.
@@safarit678 I'm being facetious in my post. I know Neil is a scientist, even if he hasn't published any work in ages. I was just humorously taking the hustler approach because Neil is still a "hustler" at heart. He thoroughly enjoys being the premier Blsck public scientist news and media calls upon. And Terrence is also a hustler, but Neil is like, "Yo, bro, not in my *space!"* 😏
Side note: While I'm highly skeptical of Terrence Howard's perspective, time will be the ultimate judge. Some used the fact he never finished his degree as a means to discredit him, but Nikola Tesla didn't have his degree either. He received an honorary PhD decades later in his life. And he was denigrated in his time as well. So, time is the ultimate judge.
@@ian_ford way to turn it racial buddy. Neil has said he hated the 'black' labeling but it seems it's what you see.
Tesla is more than a century ago and back then scientific knowledge was still basic enough for the average person with some time to spare to make advancement in more than one field. Today you need decades of rigorous study and research to pick up what was reached and make a small advancement in a very specific niche.
Trillions of years won't prove that 1x1=2, even if the future was whiter than you.
It’s sounds “good and accurate ” to someone that doesn’t understand the topic.
Neil peer reviewed it like a professional.
Absolute proof that "a *little* knowledge is a dangerous thing".
Only Chuck Norris and Terrence Howard can divide any number by zero...
Just remember there can’t have one without the other. ……… love and marriage love and marriage
1 x 1 equals 1
2 x 2 equals 4
Lucyyyyy you got some explaining to do 😂😂
1+1 = 3 when my wife and i had a child
1-1=2 in clint Eastwood movies when the shootout ends !
It would be .5 + .5 = 1
Most definitely but Most people can't do that math you dig🫡
Ah hah!!
1 + 1 approaches three for high values of 1.
What if Joe Rogan just straight up told him. “Bro you’re completely wrong and out of your mind .” 😂😂😂
Joe doesn't do that.
This sounds like me in middle school with math because it didn’t make any sense to me. So, I made my own answers up. I still failed
He couldn't comprehend a 3rd grade level math problem 🤣
So since he cant comprehend simple language, known math is wrong and his math is correct....
Best comment
Brilliant summary.
Terrance is the type of guy to pass you in the hallway and have a quick conversation with you about everything you have ever known or not.
Good lord! Neil degrasse Tyson must have had a mental breakdown reading his BS
Not saying Terrence is right because I haven’t studied his work yet but Neil once a beloved science popularizer to me, has gotten a little too full of himself, if you will.
Ego is what’s killing modern science. I saw that first hand arguing with doctors.
Also, Math is not Neil’s forte. His wife is a mathematician as far as I know. He should have had her opinion on Terrance work first.
I agree 100%
I don't like Tyson but Tyson is a scientist, this guy is an actor
I can't stand Neil anymore. Such an arrogant, pompous A hole.
@@thhisisnotherere Tyson is also establishment. I don't trust him as far as i could throw him.
Neil character-wise is not perfect. But he is a proper scientist while Howard is a moron who literally pulls shit out of his ass, makes plastic structures, and makes simulations in visual effects software. His ‘proof’ is just poetic equivocation of words, or some arts and crafts project that doesn’t do anything
Neil didn’t want to talk to Terrence anymore because he realized Terrence would waste a ton of his time over utter nonsense.
There’s two types of people in this thread:
1)those who understand basic math
2)those who have a perspective of higher intelligence and can discern numbers and their value
The argument is about basic math. Not about math in theoretical and vector contexts. To argue 1 x 1 is always 2 is stupid af, and implies either lower intelligence or obstinacy and narcissism.
Terrance is just too hung up on language and philosophy to really understand what math is. He is hung on on this word "multiply" that is not actual what multiplication does believe it or not. In a sense multiplication is counting groups. One group of one is one, one group of 2 is 2, five groups of 2 is 10. Math was created to count things and it evolved and still performs the same functions at its core.
He seems not to understand how mathematics works. There is no effects preceding causes. There is great balance in mathematics. Things add up well that’s why the theories work and can predict things in the real world
Don’t let this great actor do your taxes 😅
This bro multiplied himself onto 0.
He looks manic, too bad, good actor.
He is actually a genius
How is he a genius? Please tell us
@@executioner_ecgbert884 Because he said that he is the only person who has the answers to save the world! didn't you listen to the podcast?
Neil DeGrasse Tyson actually responded to Terrance Howard's treatise and SHOWED his responses for the world to see. Neil didn't "attack" anything Terrance wrote in his treatise. He responded logically to Terrance's ideas and theories. The fact that Terrance got in front of Joe Rogan and said NDT attacked him with no evidence shows how absolutely INSANE Terrance Howard is.
Not surprised that an actor has delusions of grandeur
Yes yes and id like to replace paper monies with chocolate. It fits in the pocket and is a delicious treat.
Dude is peak cringe, so is Neil.
this is what you get when you tell people that every opinion is valid no matter how bat shit insane
You walk to a tree a grab 1 apple. You walk over again, now you have 2 apples, 1+1=2.
If you walk over 10 x's, you have 10 apples. You can only walk over to the tree 1 time technically before the number of attempts ADDS up. Therefore 1x1 can only =1. But you can walk over 2 twice, and ADD both apples together=2, or keep them separate , but you still have 2 apples, because you did it 2 TIMES. If you walk over 10 x's and didn't bring back any apples either time, you have 10x0= 0.
How does the drone fly if his math is wrong tho? Serious question
Good example👍...This is how I understand it. I'm kinda having a hard time understanding what Terrance is actually saying.
1x1 =2 reminds me of the crazy guy that crossed his eyes to see double his fingers in patch Addams
0 x 1 = 0, 1 x 0 = 1 // 1 x 1 = 1 , 1 x 1 = 2... there are two sides of the math table. They only tell you about the inverted side. 1 as an identifier stems from you can't multiply non existence so if something is 0 it can't exist in physical space so its of indeterminant size but could have an infinity small mass therefore 1 x 1 = 1.. but that's only of you first start with the negative side of the spectrum 0 x 1 = 0. We have all been fooled by a mathematics sleight of hand. Thus in nature 1x1 = 2
It can apply in some theoretical and non-standard mathematical contexts, but to claim it's the way mathematics works is dumb af.
i support his exploration
good job
"The moment you add that times in there, the multiplicive indicator, that means there's more that one"
What about 1 x 0 ?
He talks about zero in the podcast.
@@brosifstalin415 Yeah I'm sure he had a bunch of stupid stuff to say about that too
@@John-nv5zyhe said zero doesn't exist
1 x 0 = 1
@@danielchulu1933 "that means there's more than that one"
By his logic, 1 x 0 should be more than one, not equal to one, because, "The moment you add that times in there, the multiplicative indicator, that means there's more than that one"
Neil did talk about what comes first to chicken and the egg. He said the egg came first. It just came from a different bird and I thought that was fascinating.
Next time baby
If you get offended by peer review, science is not for you.
Terrance suffers from the dunning Kruger effect. it basically means he is limited in his capacity to understand and over estimate their length of actual knowledge they posses in a field of research
Here is my issue with the people who like to site dunning Kruger. Its often cited with no actual evidence and just used as a way to dismiss arguments without actually having to address them. Not saying he is write but simply attributing something to dunning Kruger is a lazy criticism with no real substance. And also is contradictory because who is to say your conclusion isn't also dunning kruger because of your limited capacity to understand?
@@mrt094 case in point
@@mrt094The proof of him being wrong is literally out there. Every comment here says he's wrong. Every creation of man kind had been done that considers 1x1=1. What more do you want?
Only 36 pages is CRAZY😂
1 one time equals 1.....
This dude for a split second had we questioning that 😂😂
Stay grounded my friends lol
0 x 1 = 0, 1 x 0 = 1 // 1 x 1 = 1 , 1 x 1 = 2... there are two sides of the math table. They only tell you about the inverted side. 1 as an identifier stems from you can't multiply non existence so if something is 0 it can't exist in physical space so its of indeterminant size but could have an infinity small mass therefore 1 x 1 = 1.. but that's only of you first start with the negative side of the spectrum 0 x 1 = 0. We have all been fooled by a mathematics sleight of hand. Thus in nature 1x1 = 2
Joe, I know you're not a journalist, but how do you just let an insane person ramble on without being checked?
Dividing is a 3D concept, whereas subtracting is 2D. same goes for Multiplication and Adding. Though they appear the same, they do different things (obviously) It's minds like his that are the reason why there are advancements in technology. Look at Stephen Hawking for example, His original theory on black holes was thought to be right, until he himself disproved it and so he theorised another idea on black holes, with the theory of quantum theory. So in other words, Stephen hawking disproved his own theory and said it was wrong, but people weren't mad at him for disproving his own theory, so why are people aiming hate towards somebody who was challenging an idea? Never saw the same energy towards stephen hawking?, or is it because of his credentials?
I think is the credentials and lets also get real the dude started the podcast saying he had memories in the womb. I was skeptical but I've seen enough people say in response they also have memories in the womb. Just for most people its a wild thing to hear.
Only in special vector contexts. This is not how general math works. To pretend 1 x 1 doesn't equal 1 in mathematics is stupid af.
I was lost after they said hello......😮
This guy is gonna start a cult
These are red flags
That's been my suspicion as well. He starts by talking about his silly math and always starts veering into spiritualism and religion. I find it a bit concerning
Neil hurt bro feelings lol😂
This guys IQ is 1x1
No reason for you to be rude
@@eddydeathwishe4638 I think if a person walk up to me claiming he's right and our whole math has been wrong because 1x1 = 2 and not 1 on which everything we have ever created, every tool you use from Mobiles to PC to Rockets, then I'd consider that person to be a retard
No wonder is was rejected for the 2nd Ironman