@@silasarpagaus3520 considering he was bold enough to make the video in the first place either he was threatened legally or worse, either way I want to know
It isn't hard to get a 70% winrate, or better. Just always bet on heavy favourites. You'll lose money because the odds will never be favourable, but you'll get a number you can put in your advertising. The nice thing is that you don't even have to do any work; the odds the bookie gives you already reflect a pretty solid guess at the probabilities.
@@PhilippeSanerIndeed. The bookies are massive businesses with massive resources and technology. They will have better AI models and better technology then ordinary people could hope to have. The house always wins. You might have chance on a betting exchange where they just arbitrage both sides of the bet with ordinary people but probably not.
And Christianity isn’t built on these things, or at least God’s love isn’t. And this guy portrays himself as a Christian, and then says he doesn’t believe in second chances hahaha
@@JohnPedderI have been subbed since the Dan Lok days and I have legit never heard coffee once mention religion in any of his videos, are you good bro??
So, lets summarize: 1st claim - 70% (5:50) 2nd claim - 60% (7:22) Siraj's own bets - 55% (11/20) (10:20) Independent testing - 52% (16:12) This is basically an expensive monthly subscription to a dice roll. This is especially apparent since NHL and NBA games cannot finish in a tie, so a true random guess will have a 50% chance to win. Expect the bot results to drop significantly if you add group stages of FIFA/UEFA since ties are a valid outcome and not at all uncommon.
I want to say having an above 50% chance to win in sports betting is extremely typical because sports betting isn't completely random and even unskilled players can get an above 50% win rate. Sports book know this which is why it's an asymmetrical game. You bet $100, you win $90. Stuff like that. You need at least a 60%+ win rate to make any money if you make similar sized bets frequently. Or make asymmetrical bets and win out on those specific bets aka getting lucky.
That would be only if your pattern had some kind of an edge. Just copying bets coming from a bot that doesnt have an edge wont get you banned. You will look like a normal gambler, unless you dont round your numbers, or you let the bot in auto bet and bets like 10 times per second or some crazy stuff.
@@jimipet when I said “if it was possible” I meant to imply that the bot exists and it had an edge, you’re still face the limits and bans, unless you route it through a betting broker, which eats into profits.
@@tjbellah349 Yes, obviiously anything with an edge will get you banned quickly on the bookies, they are pretty fast finding that out. But you dont have to bet on bookies and casinos, if you have an edge you just go to the exchanges and fill your pockets by humiliating the other traders. Not sure if by betting brokers you mean the exchanges but I believe thats what you mean. Anyway, having a real edge against the market is practically impossible, so all those bots are scams. If you dont believe me, check the percentage of profitable traders in exchanges (or betting brokers). People who pay premium charges (meaning they are really profitable) are less than 0.5%, and even those they do it by applying some trading technics and not really having an edge over the prediction of the sports outcomes.
The paper he plagiarized was bonkers. He copy pasted the paper, and all he did was change a few technical terms e.g. he changed "logic gate" -> "logic door" and "complex Hilbert space" -> "complicated Hilbert space". This is absolutely ridiculous. Anybody who knows anything technical about that space could see through it immediately.
I will always laugh @ "Quantum Doors". Siraj was the very reason I found your channel all that time ago. Siraj is a master class in learning that some people just can't help it, like a compulsion or something. Even after the code theft was blowing up, siraj did the quantum paper plagiarism. He knew all eyes were on him. It was his moment to not screw up, but he did. And he did multiple obvious plagiarisms in this time. It was truly mind-blowing. I truly think it's something like a compulsion.
Yeah, though to be honest, it also appears like he is also hanging out with the wrong people. Which becomes at this point a self-propelling vicious circle as current behavior closes doors to better circles and choices in the future. Too bad that he for some reason doesn’t manage to channel his energy into more nobel endeavors 😮💨 Probably a life long victim/subordinate to the many hustle bros / culture
Holy shit, us ML folks know how stupid his claims are... I do NLP fo living and it makes zero sense. The sad thing is, that he knows, because he does know the basics well enough.
Let’s clarify something about sports betting. A 70%+ win rate is actually quite easy to have and maintain BUT that doesn’t mean you’re going to make any money. Betting the favorite in the money line every time is going to result in a very high win percentage, but net losses over time.
Win rate is often used by scammers, because is the easiest metric for dumb people to understand. Of course in reality it doesnt mean anything as you pointed out. The return to player ratio should be used instead, that would mean how much you get back for every 100 you wager. For example if after wagering 100 you get 100 back on average, that would be a 100% return to player ratio and would mean that you break even (no edge). The return to player ratio from sports betting is usually around 80-90% depending on the game, as bookmakers will just give you reduced odds of about 10-20%. So instead of giving you odds for example at 2, will pay you at 1.8. With that being said, breaking even at 100% return to player ratio is practically impossible, let alone to manage to get an edge of above 100%.
🎯 You can have a win rate of 99% and be down money because all the bets are made at the end of game while a team is up by 100 points. Extremely manipulative tactic.
your original coverage of Siraj is how I found your channel back then. As a software developer (back then computer science student) his videos kept popping up in my recommendations, and I was very suspicious because nobody can be an expert at every cs topic, and his videos were horribly explained and often contained instructions to fork an existing github project and only make some changes without learning Your videos were the final nail in the coffin that showed me what a fraud he is It's a shame you removed the original videos. People like him are so toxic to the tech industry, and they are EVERYWHERE, unfortunately. When I was still new to programming, I was so intimidated by people like him and almost gave up, because I thought I was an idiot for not being a know it all, but I only later realised they ard all fake
You're probably right, but I remember (probably misremember) it different. I used to like his content when it was supposed to be educational. Tbf, there's no need to reinvent the wheel, and forking existing projects is a valid way to learn imo. The day he released his "own" coin however was when I lost all respect. As someone who was active in crypto since 2011 and made my own ERC20 token on the Rinkeby testnet (which is actually trivial), I knew his coin was going to turn in some kind of cashgrab. Coffee's video on him was also how I found his channel, and I hope he reinstates the video after this...
@@nero3700 oh, no don't get me wrong; I am not against using components or forking other projects, but his videos had very little explanation of how these projects and libraries he's using work. It's often very difficult to follow a lot of what he's doing because he just skips explaining a lot of the things he uses His content on its own is extremely shallow for someone who claims to be an expert at all these topics. He isn't teaching you"AI", he's teaching you how to use AI libraries without explaining much of the "magic" behind how it all works A good teacher is someone like Andrew Ng, who actually explains to you what the theory behind the code is, how things work and how the maths fit into everything. Learning how to make a neural network in TensorFlow or Pytorch is something you can do on your own by reading thw docs in an afternoon, if you already understand the theory. You don't need Siraj
@@CoreDump451 I haven't seen Siraj's content in years, and had no idea he'd been exposed by Coffee. I still thought of him as this annoying but really intelligent character, who made me want to learn Python while simultaneously making me want to give up. I could smell the fake guru grift on him, but shrugged it off as a job requirement for content creators. His knowledge scope was always impressive in an unsettling way. It all makes sense now. "They are everywhere." I'm slowly realizing that people are jumping into all sorts of content niches and spewing engaging BS. And the growing arsenal of open repositories and AI tools makes it difficult to recognize, until they're too popular to debunk.
@@crnkmnky I hope these kinds of people didn't demotivate you from learning to program. Just know that even the best experts in the field struggle I can't claim to be an expert but I studied computer science and have been working as a developer for 3 years now, and I still feel like there's a lot I don't know Hell, even my team leaf, senior developers and my professors at university feel the same, but that's part of the fun in this field; you keep learning When you see someone like Sieaj, who claims to be expert at so many different fields that require years of learning each, alarm bells should be ringing in your head
You can have a 90% win rate sports betting but if you only win 1 buck 9 times and lose 10 bucks the other time you still are a losing gambler. People need to really look into what they invest in this space
I get what you are saying but that is often not the case. I know a lot of people who cannot create new lives beyond old expectations because they have been publicly humiliated somehow. No matter how much they changed, nor how good their work, they are ruined. Especially in internet age.
@@bk2524 but thats because a lot of people refuse to move on. I have a few acquaintances that went to jail in quebec, got out, couldnt get their lives running again, moved to ontario and got the second chance they wanted.
Those first four bets reek of "Texas sharpshooting." He waited for a streak before he started the clock, then once he had it, he backed off to keep a positive profit.
Seriously, the chart is the inverse of what it actually should look like. His history should start with dozens of small bets, followed by large bets once he is confident the bot works.
@@GSBarlev what he should do is to make prediction videos and have them as private on youtube with upload dates fixed before, then unprivate the winning ones. I'm spreading this cheat to see if some scammer would actually use it.
It's a scam but technically you can test it without actually betting money. Just record the predictions and check how many turn out right and how much money you would have won and lost
52% is theoretically the same as you just picking a random bet, regardless of certain factors everything is a 50/50 either you win or you don’t, what a scam to do the exact thing you can do all by yourself at the click of a button, love you work coffee keep exposing these clowns
"everything is 50/50" is just plain out wrong. The chance of winning the lottery isn't 50 %. Almost not bet has 50/50 probability and bets are usually designed to have a sum below 100 % to be profitable by the ones running it
Once a Scammer, always a Scammer. I don't know that it's because of the money or the adrenaline rush of fooling people but it is VERY rare that a Scammer changes for the rest of their lives. Siraj is Gross and he deserves to get Exposed all over again for being a manipulative little worm.
Best way to "cure" a scammer? Change of environment. One of my best friend fell into the trap of the easy lifestyle coming from credit card fraud. Then, due to family matters, he moved in with us, and a week later and a couple of realisations wiser, he gave up the lifestyle. And i can confidently say he hasnt relapsed in secret, since he's still a very close friend to this day that i see often, no luxury watch or sushi deliveries to be seen.
I think this belies an even bigger corporate mentality - profit and self-interest at all costs over ethics and community or human interest. It's really telling that he's tied himself to coffee's critiques and responses as if coffee is his outsourced ethics/legal department. He keeps coming to him like - can you okay this or find me a solution for my grift? He ignores coffee's actual intent, analysis and even legitimate constructive criticisms, and instead does the lowest common denominator action to pass himself off as genuine. Scammy, also laissez faire. Consider how many companies and entire industries would/do act this way without something holding them back - ethics, regulation, law, media, public pressure, the void (lol) etc. Unfortunately, I reckon Siraj thinks of himself (and the way he's trying to use coffee for legitimacy) as just a modern entrepreneur. It's unfortunate because coffee directly tries to break this conflation of greed/manipulation & entrepreneurialism/innovation. Either Siraj is so ignorantly coin driven he can't see how this comes off, or worse, he knows & thinks he can hide it.
Dude’s a fking scammer. He was one and he still is one. The only other take away I have for this is that Coffee is really nice and believes in second chance. Coffee you did your best and gave him too much credit already. It’s crystal clear he trying to market his ChatGPT wrapper as a get rich quick scheme and profit off of other’s expense. That’s it. Thank you for the entertaining video and once again showing his true color.
I agree with him coffee you should make a followup series to see if any of the scammers actually changed their ways or if anything happened to them after getting caught scamming
@@daysandwords"ATM machine" is usually said by people who either don't care, or don't understand what "ATM" means. I usually see "SMH my head" used in a playful or sarcastic way, as seen here.
To put this in perspective, the greatest trading group on Wall Street, Renaissance Technologies, made money on ~51% of bets. The way they put it is if it had been lower than 50.5%, they would've been out of business. NOW you can understand why 70% should be a red flag.
@@fraxizztv6433serial killers are people who’ve done things multiple times; although yeah, everyone should get the chance. Just because that chance exists doesn’t mean it has to be in a space that threatens or victimizes others.
Everyone deserves a 2nd chance but If someone scams on youtube, they are free to pursue their career elsewhere but shouldn't be allowed in youtube ever again. I'm not sure how to put it into words, something like "2nd chances shouldn't be given on the same field where their first offense was commited". The same way everyone would be concerned if a child abuser gets out of jail and is then offered a job in an elementary school. Let's give 'smarter' second chances.
Yeah, it's like if you're involved with a crime, you shouldn't be able to get a job related to that. Certain things like health issues fall under that too. Like someone convicted of reckless driving shouldn't have a delivery driver position or an alcoholic shouldn't be a bartender.
I appreciate you at least being open to 2nd chances. I can't speak to the specifics for scammers and fraudsters. But in our research into recidivism, we've found that in places and systems where real 2nd chances are made available, a large majority seize those opportunities and do not let go.
ML models to predict sports outcome have been used since 1984 (Bill Benter on horse racing) and are used extensivelly nowadays. This is mainly how odds are generated in the sports market exchanges from thousands of people putting their models to test, and the odds converge to the best possible prediction which is practically impossible to "predict" better. To think that GPT which is a language model AI, has to offer something new compared to decades of trained ML models spesifically for sports outcoumes, is at best laughable.
@@jimipet 100%. Language models do have real use in like, stock trading algorithms particularly for more speculative assets where public investor sentiment might be a useful indicator, but I can't think of really any signal where there would be some language dependent variable in the outcomes of sports betting. I guess maybe you could try and estimate bettor sentiment for a particular team? So like look for situations where the odds are off because of some variable that depends on bettor volume that is too high because of an unreasonable sentiment towards a player or team? But this also wouldn't be anything new, models to estimate sentiment like this have existed for at least 10 years. In my experience, there's always a small edge to be found, but the idea that chatgpt would somehow know this shit is just comical. If anything, chatgpt is going to be way biased towards teams that historically get more public attention because that's how text works. Siraj also knows all of this, the guy is clearly a scumbag but he does know quite a bit about ML, I watched a few of his videos back in the day, so like, his lies are far more insidious than they appear to the uninitiated viewer.
@@jimipetRight. The major innovation of Generative Pre-trained Transformers vs. deep learning is that they're _simplified_ enough to run on commodity hardware while retaining decent performance in language-based tasks. They *cannot* find deep patterns like the ML models you cite because they *explicitly don't have* the recurrent neural layers.
@@GSBarlev I wouldn't say that Transformers can't find deep patterns, I'd say it has more to do with the data source that a LLM is trained on vs. any kind of model that is being built to specifically predict sports betting outcomes. Next token prediction (as it's commonly done today anyways) is just a fundamentally divergent task from predicting sports outcomes. The Transformer architecture absolutely could be used on the sport betting task, and I'd even bet it fair pretty well, but you'd have to configure it pretty differently from the language task. Transformers have previously achieved SoTA on some time series tasks for example. Transformers do likely have a kind of model bias, but I wouldn't characterize their success as being to run on GPUs. When comparing to RNNs, the parallelized properties that Transformers have is absolutely a benefit, but I'd argue the more important part is that they don't have the vanishing/exploding gradient optimization problems that RNNs do. This allows Transformers to learn a more complicated set of interactions between tokens over longer sequences. There is a kernel of truth in your comment about deep patterns being associated with neural net layers though, as that does seem to be (at least according to current research) where most of the complicated computation happens in the Transformer, you can think of the attention layers as taking in a series of data and computing features that the neural net layers can then ingest more easily, very analogous to convolutional layers in CNNs.
You obviously don't believe in second chances. It's been 5 years. There's no way he would lie to us. Why you don't believe in 3rd chances is beyond me. 5 days has given him time to reflect.
coffee, you never disappoint! Awesome stuff. And to be honest, I like that you seem kind and you do your best to give these scammers the benefit of the doubt. It takes twice as long to debunk, but it's twice as entertaining, and you can be sure that you've really done your best to prove yourself wrong. I'd like to point out to everyone that for a content creator, pulling down a video that is performing decently is lost revenue with ZERO upside. The video is done, all your work, time, and costs are already sunk. To do it out of kindness for someone is special. (I know it's probably meaningless for the bottom line, since a 5 year old video about a scammers is unlikely to be pulling that many views). Great, great content.
I love your channels BECAUSE you are always so reasonable and give credit to the scammers in order to fairly dissect and disprove their arguments. Nevr change
Being a software engineer really unveils the "magic" behind these tools because you are exposed to similar problems and how you would go around solving them. AI doesn't have inherent logic, and algorithms are made from human logic being re-used to solve a specific problem. They are normally fine-tuned (by adding more *human* logic) so that they get better results to a point they can beat humans (narrow AI). However, if someone had an algorithm to solve this problem (betting) we would have solved the most foundational problem in the world, which is predicting what will happen. If a bot like this existed, it would have been first an algorithm that would've had much more traction, and not only that, it would certaintly not be used to bet in sports. It would be an extremely powerful AI model closely relating to an AGI. So yeah, all of that to say that's ridiculous
His spreadsheet on the $5 bet wins are super horrible returns. Meaning, he was betting the overwhelming favorites most of the time to bump his win rate on pointless bets and he still failed at that. The 52% win rate and all those are -110 or worse. Meaning you take a 10% vig or worse, to win 2%. IE you take the favorite or even spread every time and lose to the house vig in the end. Thats why the house has the vig.
*sigh* Seeing these scams always hurts. For anyone still on the fence, take it from a complete stranger on the internet that's been writing AI for the last 6 years, the technology we have now isn't able to predict sports outcomes or the stock market. We can make edicated guesses, but the actual accuracy will always be trash. Save your money
The 70%+ win rate doesn't need to be unrealistic, but can be VERY, VERY misleading. If you bet on almost guaranteed bets (for example, on a team that has a 3 goals lead on minute 80) then you're almost guaranteed to win this bet. This however means nothing when you know that the odds of that happening are almost 100% (Odds wise, basically wins u cents for betting say $1000). Do this 100 times and your “win rate” will be insanely high, but this isn't worth the risk with the amounts of money you'd need to risk in each bet in order to win anything significant.
Win rate is a joke measurement as long as you don't include your average odds you placed the bet on. You could be betting super low moneylines, win 9 out of 10 and still lose money
Win rate is often used by scammers, because is the easiest metric for dumb people to understand. Of course in reality it doesnt mean anything as you pointed out. The return to player ratio should be used instead, that would mean how much you get back for every 100 you wager. For example if after wagering 100 you get 100 back on average, that would be a 100% return to player ratio and would mean that you break even (no edge). The return to player ratio from sports betting is usually around 80-90% depending on the game, as bookmakers will just give you reduced odds of about 10-20%. So instead of giving you odds for example at 2, will pay you at 1.8. With that being said, breaking even at 100% return to player ratio is practically impossible, let alone to manage to get an edge of above 100%.
It's people like Sitaj that ruin it for the rest of us. Honestly, as an aspiring scammer, it's getting harder and harder and I don't know what to do anymore 😢
Using a LLM to make predictions for a problem like this only shows that the guy has absolutely no understanding of how machine learning (or let's use the buzzword: AI) works, and which models to use for what purposes...
Yes you can lol it happens every day. Some of you are so delusional to the universe around them, but at least more and more people are Awakening to these aspects of existence.
@@austincrowmusic2378yes, the plane company has power over google in order to force them to silently delete videos about an alleged suicide despite the fact theres dozens of high profile videos on the topic the news covered it. Its a really big global conspiracy, guys you gotta believe me.
He posted on Reddit that people in the comments were taking it as 100% fact and not just speculation and he didn't want to spread misinformation. He also said Boeing didn't tell him to remove it.
For anyone asking about the deleted video "I wanted to share my opinion about how strange the circumstances were but 15 min after publication I saw some comments were taking it as fact that the “whistleblower was 100% murdered by Boeing”, as opposed to “whistleblower death is strange/suspicious”. So after thinking a few more min I removed it to avoid misinfo. This post is just to answer the inevitable “where is the video” questions. Voidzilla content is a fun way to express myself, but I should’ve kept away from speculating too much on such a serious topic. No matter how “suspicious” it looks, the investigation is still ongoing and we don’t know what happened. Might revisit the story once the investigation wraps up and give thoughts then. EDIT: some posters were speculating BOEING made me take it down! Not true at all!"
The spreadhseet he shared with the 20 bets it was hilarious. Even if the bets and outcomes on the spreadsheet were true, people who know about statistics and variance will laugh. There is no "system" that can beat the odds anyway, but if for some reason you want to test your system against the sports odds, to be confident about the system's performance you will need at least 1000 bets to bring the variance down.
If someone is ever offering up their "system" or "way" of making money to you for a cost, but they could easily make 10x by just keeping it to themselves...they are trying to be nice and generous and just help everyone else. 100% a scam, every time.
You could forgive people who do something accidentally or unknowingly, but if someone willfully deceives, they never should be given a second chance. Do so at your own peril.
The real question is: What happened to the video about the Boeing whistleblower that "unalived himself", Mr zilla? I could've sworn I saw a notification about it 😏
I wanted to share my opinion about how strange the circumstances were but 15 min after publication I saw some comments were taking it as fact that the “whistleblower was 100% murdered by Boeing”, as opposed to “whistleblower death is strange/suspicious”. So after thinking a few more min I removed it to avoid misinfo. This post is just to answer the inevitable “where is the video” questions.
I didn’t get to watch the whole video. I clicked on it and had to stop after 2 minutes. When I returned an hour later the video is gone. Can someone tell me roughly what Coffee’s take was about the whistleblower incident?
The eternal bar that must be met to determine if something isn't a scam; if this thing is so profitable and good, why are they making money from selling how to access it/do it instead of just putting their time and energy into doing the thing itself? Always ask yourself this question, folks.
Hey Coffeezilla! Love your videos! One thing, I recommend you to use a solid color instead of blurring the image because people can still unblur the image. Either way! Love the void!!
I'm genuinely impressed he has a product that is marginally better than flipping a coin. The fact that it isn't worse than that is impressive given the clear intelligence and skill he has in programming and AI design.
Seeing Coff in the end of this video seem so much like those Sharks he used to watch review and invest in products oh so similarly to this years prior makes me have hope in this world. Good job bud, you made it.
People never learn. The logic is always simple - if you're SELLING something that promises to make a lot of money fast, you would simply use it yourself exclusively. Or you'd give it away for free. This is an IQ test and the people paying for it have a low score.
"I made an infinite money printer, but instead of printing money, i'm selling the money printer to you!"
Well it takes so much time to print each bill, and I need money now 😊
Even Victor Lestig, the man who sold the Eiffel Tower, did the scam on long boat journeys 😅
More like a money muncher 😅
@@Epinardscaramel -twice
They is his money printer.
This being a 2nd chance thing deserves him to be main channel shamed
What deserves to be on the main channel is the Boeing video that was just made private, come on Coffee, do the man a solid and expose this filth
@DThomas4400 i think coffee isn't trying to "commit suicide"
@@silasarpagaus3520huh?
@@silasarpagaus3520 considering he was bold enough to make the video in the first place either he was threatened legally or worse, either way I want to know
Shut up about it, he took it down cos people like you are taking it as gospel instead of speculation and get weirdly intense about it.@@DThomas4400
Dude really went for the: I want to take this chance to apologize... to absolutely nobody
the double scammer does what the fook he wants
This is basically that "Call an ambulance" clip but with grifting instead.
@@mrozushidamn this comment is gold
@@mrozushihahahaha 😂
Please tell me Coffeezilla put the original video back up.
He never mentioned it at the end.
This Siraj guy reaching out to Coffee is like a serial killer that sends in their own notes in to the police during their investigations
Like the guy that went on Rogan and then was arrested for a heinous crime shortly after.
Hahahhahahahahahahah
@@pocketaces6756indeeed... The blonde wig was the cherry on top..
So this guy is a BTK of scammers
lmaoooo
Coffee really needs to release a merch line that has the quote "I used to respect Coffeezilla, until he exposed me" on them
Yes!
💯
Honestly, he needs to just print out the bingo cards
idk its kinda cringy tbh
Would you buy it though?
I wasn’t convinced of the 70% win rate until he overlayed that on a picture of Venom dunking on Spiderman. Maybe it’s legit??
It isn't hard to get a 70% winrate, or better. Just always bet on heavy favourites. You'll lose money because the odds will never be favourable, but you'll get a number you can put in your advertising. The nice thing is that you don't even have to do any work; the odds the bookie gives you already reflect a pretty solid guess at the probabilities.
No. Your spider sense should be tingling.
Maybe it's legit in another Spiderverse
Facts.
@@PhilippeSanerIndeed. The bookies are massive businesses with massive resources and technology. They will have better AI models and better technology then ordinary people could hope to have. The house always wins. You might have chance on a betting exchange where they just arbitrage both sides of the bet with ordinary people but probably not.
Third chance for Siraj? :)
"Give a chance to old Siraj, woudja?"
How bout I go back in time and make sure his parents never met?
Yknow gotta respect the "upon getting called out, offer your accuser to join the team" gambit. Bold move.
"Listen to this guy, he's been using it since day 1!"
The guy: POT OF PISS
"It's not a holy grail, it's a pot of piss" is such an awesome insult.
😂😂😂
I liked him loool. he was kinda funny and sounded honest. (also his voice is a bit 🙈)
The void never forgets...
The void never forgives...
The void is relentless in its pursuit of punishment for the unjust.
And Christianity isn’t built on these things, or at least God’s love isn’t. And this guy portrays himself as a Christian, and then says he doesn’t believe in second chances hahaha
@@JohnPedderI have been subbed since the Dan Lok days and I have legit never heard coffee once mention religion in any of his videos, are you good bro??
The void never avoids.
@@JohnPedder It's a good thing too! Second chances are for people, not subhumans.
@@JohnPedder You need to do better if you're gonna push a bait comment.
So, lets summarize:
1st claim - 70% (5:50)
2nd claim - 60% (7:22)
Siraj's own bets - 55% (11/20) (10:20)
Independent testing - 52% (16:12)
This is basically an expensive monthly subscription to a dice roll. This is especially apparent since NHL and NBA games cannot finish in a tie, so a true random guess will have a 50% chance to win. Expect the bot results to drop significantly if you add group stages of FIFA/UEFA since ties are a valid outcome and not at all uncommon.
I want to say having an above 50% chance to win in sports betting is extremely typical because sports betting isn't completely random and even unskilled players can get an above 50% win rate.
Sports book know this which is why it's an asymmetrical game. You bet $100, you win $90. Stuff like that.
You need at least a 60%+ win rate to make any money if you make similar sized bets frequently. Or make asymmetrical bets and win out on those specific bets aka getting lucky.
Stay COLD, Coffee! No grace for these people! “Mercy for the perpetrator is cruelty to the innocent” - thanks for protecting us from these creeps!
If a sports betting bot was possible, your accounts would get banned in weeks because of your betting patterns.
That would be only if your pattern had some kind of an edge. Just copying bets coming from a bot that doesnt have an edge wont get you banned. You will look like a normal gambler, unless you dont round your numbers, or you let the bot in auto bet and bets like 10 times per second or some crazy stuff.
@@jimipet when I said “if it was possible” I meant to imply that the bot exists and it had an edge, you’re still face the limits and bans, unless you route it through a betting broker, which eats into profits.
@@tjbellah349 Yes, obviiously anything with an edge will get you banned quickly on the bookies, they are pretty fast finding that out. But you dont have to bet on bookies and casinos, if you have an edge you just go to the exchanges and fill your pockets by humiliating the other traders. Not sure if by betting brokers you mean the exchanges but I believe thats what you mean. Anyway, having a real edge against the market is practically impossible, so all those bots are scams. If you dont believe me, check the percentage of profitable traders in exchanges (or betting brokers). People who pay premium charges (meaning they are really profitable) are less than 0.5%, and even those they do it by applying some trading technics and not really having an edge over the prediction of the sports outcomes.
Not necessarily bud
A 60% win rate is pretty bad. I didn't need ChatGPT to tell me that the Ravens were almost certain to spank the Panthers.
The paper he plagiarized was bonkers. He copy pasted the paper, and all he did was change a few technical terms e.g. he changed "logic gate" -> "logic door" and "complex Hilbert space" -> "complicated Hilbert space". This is absolutely ridiculous. Anybody who knows anything technical about that space could see through it immediately.
Logic door is so funny
"complicated Hilbert space", what a genius
Interesting to see another guy interested in AI research here
@@alfred9805that definitely sounds a term ChatGPT would make up
So he's a guy trying to make everyone think he's the shit
I will always laugh @ "Quantum Doors". Siraj was the very reason I found your channel all that time ago.
Siraj is a master class in learning that some people just can't help it, like a compulsion or something. Even after the code theft was blowing up, siraj did the quantum paper plagiarism. He knew all eyes were on him. It was his moment to not screw up, but he did. And he did multiple obvious plagiarisms in this time. It was truly mind-blowing. I truly think it's something like a compulsion.
Hey sentdex! Good seeing you here dude.
Yeah, though to be honest, it also appears like he is also hanging out with the wrong people. Which becomes at this point a self-propelling vicious circle as current behavior closes doors to better circles and choices in the future. Too bad that he for some reason doesn’t manage to channel his energy into more nobel endeavors 😮💨 Probably a life long victim/subordinate to the many hustle bros / culture
sentdex the legend ❤
Its a psychological disorder of varying degrees in people.
Holy shit, us ML folks know how stupid his claims are... I do NLP fo living and it makes zero sense. The sad thing is, that he knows, because he does know the basics well enough.
I love the term Guru. It's so insulting without inherently being insulting
Which sucks because the original meaning of the word is not that at all.
@@untitled6391 yeah :( it sucks
Let’s clarify something about sports betting. A 70%+ win rate is actually quite easy to have and maintain BUT that doesn’t mean you’re going to make any money. Betting the favorite in the money line every time is going to result in a very high win percentage, but net losses over time.
interesting, good to know (as a non betting person)
Win rate is often used by scammers, because is the easiest metric for dumb people to understand. Of course in reality it doesnt mean anything as you pointed out. The return to player ratio should be used instead, that would mean how much you get back for every 100 you wager. For example if after wagering 100 you get 100 back on average, that would be a 100% return to player ratio and would mean that you break even (no edge). The return to player ratio from sports betting is usually around 80-90% depending on the game, as bookmakers will just give you reduced odds of about 10-20%. So instead of giving you odds for example at 2, will pay you at 1.8. With that being said, breaking even at 100% return to player ratio is practically impossible, let alone to manage to get an edge of above 100%.
🎯 You can have a win rate of 99% and be down money because all the bets are made at the end of game while a team is up by 100 points.
Extremely manipulative tactic.
52% you could just blindfold yourself and ht a button and do better than that
I cannot understand why that's true. And that's why I don't bet on sports. I bet on myself 💪🏾
your original coverage of Siraj is how I found your channel back then.
As a software developer (back then computer science student) his videos kept popping up in my recommendations, and I was very suspicious because nobody can be an expert at every cs topic, and his videos were horribly explained and often contained instructions to fork an existing github project and only make some changes without learning
Your videos were the final nail in the coffin that showed me what a fraud he is
It's a shame you removed the original videos. People like him are so toxic to the tech industry, and they are EVERYWHERE, unfortunately. When I was still new to programming, I was so intimidated by people like him and almost gave up, because I thought I was an idiot for not being a know it all, but I only later realised they ard all fake
You're probably right, but I remember (probably misremember) it different. I used to like his content when it was supposed to be educational. Tbf, there's no need to reinvent the wheel, and forking existing projects is a valid way to learn imo. The day he released his "own" coin however was when I lost all respect. As someone who was active in crypto since 2011 and made my own ERC20 token on the Rinkeby testnet (which is actually trivial), I knew his coin was going to turn in some kind of cashgrab. Coffee's video on him was also how I found his channel, and I hope he reinstates the video after this...
@@nero3700 oh, no don't get me wrong; I am not against using components or forking other projects, but his videos had very little explanation of how these projects and libraries he's using work. It's often very difficult to follow a lot of what he's doing because he just skips explaining a lot of the things he uses
His content on its own is extremely shallow for someone who claims to be an expert at all these topics. He isn't teaching you"AI", he's teaching you how to use AI libraries without explaining much of the "magic" behind how it all works
A good teacher is someone like Andrew Ng, who actually explains to you what the theory behind the code is, how things work and how the maths fit into everything.
Learning how to make a neural network in TensorFlow or Pytorch is something you can do on your own by reading thw docs in an afternoon, if you already understand the theory. You don't need Siraj
@@CoreDump451 I haven't seen Siraj's content in years, and had no idea he'd been exposed by Coffee. I still thought of him as this annoying but really intelligent character, who made me want to learn Python while simultaneously making me want to give up.
I could smell the fake guru grift on him, but shrugged it off as a job requirement for content creators. His knowledge scope was always impressive in an unsettling way. It all makes sense now.
"They are everywhere." I'm slowly realizing that people are jumping into all sorts of content niches and spewing engaging BS. And the growing arsenal of open repositories and AI tools makes it difficult to recognize, until they're too popular to debunk.
@@crnkmnky I hope these kinds of people didn't demotivate you from learning to program.
Just know that even the best experts in the field struggle
I can't claim to be an expert but I studied computer science and have been working as a developer for 3 years now, and I still feel like there's a lot I don't know
Hell, even my team leaf, senior developers and my professors at university feel the same, but that's part of the fun in this field; you keep learning
When you see someone like Sieaj, who claims to be expert at so many different fields that require years of learning each, alarm bells should be ringing in your head
AI and Bots are one thing. You can create smart algorithms but using an LLM in place of intense mathematics is *insane*.
Yes. This is like claiming you’ve invented the circular saw, by rebranding a sharp hammer. It’s just not and it’s not the right design.
@@TinBane i think it's more like claiming that a hammer is a saw
I was looking for this comment. Wouldn't ChatGPT just make up odds?
@@melissad4056you could give it data through prompts.
Chatgpt can do some math but I've got to think it'd be doing a lot of hallucinating.
Lesson to learn: do not remove, make private.
this, I was really surprised Coffee removed it entirely. make it private, then if they pull the same shit make it public again!!
If it's an old video maybe he felt it wasn't very good compared to the newer ones? I also thought coffee would restore the video at the end
You can have a 90% win rate sports betting but if you only win 1 buck 9 times and lose 10 bucks the other time you still are a losing gambler. People need to really look into what they invest in this space
Don't talk with him about expected values bro, he only uses neural networks and click bait titles; simple statistics are not trendy.
It's always weird when these people actively point you in the direction of more incriminating evidence
They think they can convince them otherwise
Never underestimate the stupidity of people.
I love how this scammer summoned Coffeezilla so he can immediately start scamming right in front of Coffee's salad.
Anytime someone refers to himself as "a builder and an entrepreneur", make sure your phone and wallet are still in your pockets.
Our boy Coffee got bamboozled!
Gotta be stone cold. If they've changed, their new work will speak for them.
I get what you are saying but that is often not the case. I know a lot of people who cannot create new lives beyond old expectations because they have been publicly humiliated somehow.
No matter how much they changed, nor how good their work, they are ruined. Especially in internet age.
@@bk2524 but thats because a lot of people refuse to move on. I have a few acquaintances that went to jail in quebec, got out, couldnt get their lives running again, moved to ontario and got the second chance they wanted.
"the first bet it made was a 1000".. That's not what you start testing with I freakin hope - instantly suspicious
you would first test it in a fake data environment that would simulate years of data and decision making.
Those first four bets reek of "Texas sharpshooting." He waited for a streak before he started the clock, then once he had it, he backed off to keep a positive profit.
Seriously, the chart is the inverse of what it actually should look like. His history should start with dozens of small bets, followed by large bets once he is confident the bot works.
@@GSBarlev what he should do is to make prediction videos and have them as private on youtube with upload dates fixed before, then unprivate the winning ones.
I'm spreading this cheat to see if some scammer would actually use it.
It's a scam but technically you can test it without actually betting money. Just record the predictions and check how many turn out right and how much money you would have won and lost
52% is theoretically the same as you just picking a random bet, regardless of certain factors everything is a 50/50 either you win or you don’t, what a scam to do the exact thing you can do all by yourself at the click of a button, love you work coffee keep exposing these clowns
"everything is 50/50" is just plain out wrong. The chance of winning the lottery isn't 50 %. Almost not bet has 50/50 probability and bets are usually designed to have a sum below 100 % to be profitable by the ones running it
"This machine will tell us exactly where the last golden tickets are"
Once a Scammer, always a Scammer. I don't know that it's because of the money or the adrenaline rush of fooling people but it is VERY rare that a Scammer changes for the rest of their lives. Siraj is Gross and he deserves to get Exposed all over again for being a manipulative little worm.
Best way to "cure" a scammer? Change of environment. One of my best friend fell into the trap of the easy lifestyle coming from credit card fraud. Then, due to family matters, he moved in with us, and a week later and a couple of realisations wiser, he gave up the lifestyle. And i can confidently say he hasnt relapsed in secret, since he's still a very close friend to this day that i see often, no luxury watch or sushi deliveries to be seen.
Look at Bryan Legend. 5 or 6x crypto scammer
I think this belies an even bigger corporate mentality - profit and self-interest at all costs over ethics and community or human interest. It's really telling that he's tied himself to coffee's critiques and responses as if coffee is his outsourced ethics/legal department. He keeps coming to him like - can you okay this or find me a solution for my grift? He ignores coffee's actual intent, analysis and even legitimate constructive criticisms, and instead does the lowest common denominator action to pass himself off as genuine. Scammy, also laissez faire.
Consider how many companies and entire industries would/do act this way without something holding them back - ethics, regulation, law, media, public pressure, the void (lol) etc. Unfortunately, I reckon Siraj thinks of himself (and the way he's trying to use coffee for legitimacy) as just a modern entrepreneur. It's unfortunate because coffee directly tries to break this conflation of greed/manipulation & entrepreneurialism/innovation. Either Siraj is so ignorantly coin driven he can't see how this comes off, or worse, he knows & thinks he can hide it.
I use to be a fraudster.. I learned my lesson when I got fifteen years.. I will never do that again
It’s cuz he’s indian
All he did was get himself exposed all over again. Now there's a new video in the algorithm
Dude’s a fking scammer. He was one and he still is one.
The only other take away I have for this is that Coffee is really nice and believes in second chance. Coffee you did your best and gave him too much credit already. It’s crystal clear he trying to market his ChatGPT wrapper as a get rich quick scheme and profit off of other’s expense. That’s it.
Thank you for the entertaining video and once again showing his true color.
I agree with him coffee you should make a followup series to see if any of the scammers actually changed their ways or if anything happened to them after getting caught scamming
Come now, Coffee. He did change. He changed from a plagiarist to a grifter. SMH my head.
Hang on, has "SMH my head" become the new "ATM machine"?
@@daysandwords where you put in your PIN number?
@@daysandwords"ATM machine" is usually said by people who either don't care, or don't understand what "ATM" means.
I usually see "SMH my head" used in a playful or sarcastic way, as seen here.
Respect the guy in the audio, to call himself stupid and realized he was caught in a scam. smart, good man.
To put this in perspective, the greatest trading group on Wall Street, Renaissance Technologies, made money on ~51% of bets. The way they put it is if it had been lower than 50.5%, they would've been out of business. NOW you can understand why 70% should be a red flag.
I feel like everyone deserves a second chance. Just maybe not a third or fourth chance
Serial killers? Child predators? They deserve a second chance, too? 😮
Second chances are okay, but if fail, the consequence must be double at least.
@@fraxizztv6433serial killers are people who’ve done things multiple times; although yeah, everyone should get the chance. Just because that chance exists doesn’t mean it has to be in a space that threatens or victimizes others.
(To clarify, I’m not saying they should be redeemable, simply given a second chance at life.)
@@fraxizztv6433no
Everyone deserves a 2nd chance but If someone scams on youtube, they are free to pursue their career elsewhere but shouldn't be allowed in youtube ever again. I'm not sure how to put it into words, something like "2nd chances shouldn't be given on the same field where their first offense was commited". The same way everyone would be concerned if a child abuser gets out of jail and is then offered a job in an elementary school. Let's give 'smarter' second chances.
THANK YOU
Exactly
Yeah, it's like if you're involved with a crime, you shouldn't be able to get a job related to that. Certain things like health issues fall under that too. Like someone convicted of reckless driving shouldn't have a delivery driver position or an alcoholic shouldn't be a bartender.
Bruh thus is a terrible idea, what if people have skills related to that field
@@narsimhas1360 then you gotta get a new skill
Honestly that's the perfect scam for today :D Both AI and sports betting have so much hype around it and nobody actually knows what they are doing
I'm pretty sure that "mysterious oracle that tells you the winning bets in advance" is a grift literally as old as humanity itself.
I remember that Lex Fridman removed his interview with Siraj after his course scam was exposed
Lex Friedman is such a tool
nothing screams scammer like "openai devday".
Thank you for keeping the garbage taken care of. I hate these grifters with every ounce of my soul.
The way he tried to recruit you to his team when you called him out 😂 guy's got gall, I'll give him that
Forget about some scammer, what's this deal about the Boeing guy?
Seems like someone committed suicide on him…. If you catch my drift.
Where did you find this?
Apparently Coffee posted a video on this channel about the Boeing guy who was suicided but removed said video super quick.
@@EpsilonsamaBoeing doing everything they can to cover it up
I second this!!
This guy is the perfect embodiment of all that's going wrong with the "AI influencer" sphere...
this channel should be thought everywhere in school & university to educate people ❤
I appreciate you at least being open to 2nd chances. I can't speak to the specifics for scammers and fraudsters. But in our research into recidivism, we've found that in places and systems where real 2nd chances are made available, a large majority seize those opportunities and do not let go.
"I've been keeping this secret from everyone but everyone has been asking me to release it so I did" ah yes. "Everyone"
As an ML engineer, the idea that GPT could ever make the basis for a sports betting bot is patently ridiculous
ML models to predict sports outcome have been used since 1984 (Bill Benter on horse racing) and are used extensivelly nowadays. This is mainly how odds are generated in the sports market exchanges from thousands of people putting their models to test, and the odds converge to the best possible prediction which is practically impossible to "predict" better. To think that GPT which is a language model AI, has to offer something new compared to decades of trained ML models spesifically for sports outcoumes, is at best laughable.
@@jimipet 100%. Language models do have real use in like, stock trading algorithms particularly for more speculative assets where public investor sentiment might be a useful indicator, but I can't think of really any signal where there would be some language dependent variable in the outcomes of sports betting. I guess maybe you could try and estimate bettor sentiment for a particular team? So like look for situations where the odds are off because of some variable that depends on bettor volume that is too high because of an unreasonable sentiment towards a player or team? But this also wouldn't be anything new, models to estimate sentiment like this have existed for at least 10 years. In my experience, there's always a small edge to be found, but the idea that chatgpt would somehow know this shit is just comical. If anything, chatgpt is going to be way biased towards teams that historically get more public attention because that's how text works. Siraj also knows all of this, the guy is clearly a scumbag but he does know quite a bit about ML, I watched a few of his videos back in the day, so like, his lies are far more insidious than they appear to the uninitiated viewer.
@@jimipetRight. The major innovation of Generative Pre-trained Transformers vs. deep learning is that they're _simplified_ enough to run on commodity hardware while retaining decent performance in language-based tasks. They *cannot* find deep patterns like the ML models you cite because they *explicitly don't have* the recurrent neural layers.
@@GSBarlev I wouldn't say that Transformers can't find deep patterns, I'd say it has more to do with the data source that a LLM is trained on vs. any kind of model that is being built to specifically predict sports betting outcomes. Next token prediction (as it's commonly done today anyways) is just a fundamentally divergent task from predicting sports outcomes. The Transformer architecture absolutely could be used on the sport betting task, and I'd even bet it fair pretty well, but you'd have to configure it pretty differently from the language task. Transformers have previously achieved SoTA on some time series tasks for example. Transformers do likely have a kind of model bias, but I wouldn't characterize their success as being to run on GPUs. When comparing to RNNs, the parallelized properties that Transformers have is absolutely a benefit, but I'd argue the more important part is that they don't have the vanishing/exploding gradient optimization problems that RNNs do. This allows Transformers to learn a more complicated set of interactions between tokens over longer sequences. There is a kernel of truth in your comment about deep patterns being associated with neural net layers though, as that does seem to be (at least according to current research) where most of the complicated computation happens in the Transformer, you can think of the attention layers as taking in a series of data and computing features that the neural net layers can then ingest more easily, very analogous to convolutional layers in CNNs.
You obviously don't believe in second chances. It's been 5 years. There's no way he would lie to us.
Why you don't believe in 3rd chances is beyond me. 5 days has given him time to reflect.
coffee, you never disappoint! Awesome stuff. And to be honest, I like that you seem kind and you do your best to give these scammers the benefit of the doubt. It takes twice as long to debunk, but it's twice as entertaining, and you can be sure that you've really done your best to prove yourself wrong.
I'd like to point out to everyone that for a content creator, pulling down a video that is performing decently is lost revenue with ZERO upside. The video is done, all your work, time, and costs are already sunk. To do it out of kindness for someone is special. (I know it's probably meaningless for the bottom line, since a 5 year old video about a scammers is unlikely to be pulling that many views).
Great, great content.
I love your channels BECAUSE you are always so reasonable and give credit to the scammers in order to fairly dissect and disprove their arguments. Nevr change
Being a software engineer really unveils the "magic" behind these tools because you are exposed to similar problems and how you would go around solving them. AI doesn't have inherent logic, and algorithms are made from human logic being re-used to solve a specific problem. They are normally fine-tuned (by adding more *human* logic) so that they get better results to a point they can beat humans (narrow AI). However, if someone had an algorithm to solve this problem (betting) we would have solved the most foundational problem in the world, which is predicting what will happen. If a bot like this existed, it would have been first an algorithm that would've had much more traction, and not only that, it would certaintly not be used to bet in sports. It would be an extremely powerful AI model closely relating to an AGI. So yeah, all of that to say that's ridiculous
they all want to live the movie _Pi_ so bad.
Sports has random outcomes so how could a machine predict them??? The cahtbot predicts the future I guess??😂😂😂😂
can confirm as lead swe @ mastercard
@@Cannabis_Connoisseurnot truly random.
@@Cannabis_Connoisseurit's not random.
His spreadsheet on the $5 bet wins are super horrible returns. Meaning, he was betting the overwhelming favorites most of the time to bump his win rate on pointless bets and he still failed at that.
The 52% win rate and all those are -110 or worse. Meaning you take a 10% vig or worse, to win 2%. IE you take the favorite or even spread every time and lose to the house vig in the end. Thats why the house has the vig.
"Pwease wemoove da mean video u mad pwetty pwease" :(
"Okay. Fair enough."
"Neyeh-heh-heh, gotchu, now would u wike to see my new scam Coffee?" >:)
*sigh* Seeing these scams always hurts. For anyone still on the fence, take it from a complete stranger on the internet that's been writing AI for the last 6 years, the technology we have now isn't able to predict sports outcomes or the stock market. We can make edicated guesses, but the actual accuracy will always be trash. Save your money
Nothing makes me smile like a 20+min vid from coffee. I would listen to him yap all day
This stuff is why I don't give people a second chance. Once a scammer, always a scammer.
I would be interested to hear how you pronounce "scammer".
Never forgive scammers if they changed they can make their own money.
Preying on gamblers. What a swell guy Siraj is!
Does this attract people who already gamble more than people who have no idea about sport betting and use it because of it?
I have no idea about sports gambling but I do bet on options, even then I tell people to just buy VOO which is a safe market fund
Forget whatever I was watching before, instantly clicked on that notification
Damn, me too.
I was actually watching this video, got the notification, and then restarted it just for posterity and principality
Fr I was like wtff is this shit hahaha
I'm ADDICTED to VOIDZILLA...
I need VOIDZILLA REHAB...!!!!
The 70%+ win rate doesn't need to be unrealistic, but can be VERY, VERY misleading. If you bet on almost guaranteed bets (for example, on a team that has a 3 goals lead on minute 80) then you're almost guaranteed to win this bet. This however means nothing when you know that the odds of that happening are almost 100% (Odds wise, basically wins u cents for betting say $1000). Do this 100 times and your “win rate” will be insanely high, but this isn't worth the risk with the amounts of money you'd need to risk in each bet in order to win anything significant.
I respect you for giving him a second chance.
Dont let him be the cause to lose faith in poeple!
I'm loving the throwbacks to old scammers. Dan Lok when tho?
Reading his name makes me feel all nostalgic
Win rate is a joke measurement as long as you don't include your average odds you placed the bet on. You could be betting super low moneylines, win 9 out of 10 and still lose money
Win rate is often used by scammers, because is the easiest metric for dumb people to understand. Of course in reality it doesnt mean anything as you pointed out. The return to player ratio should be used instead, that would mean how much you get back for every 100 you wager. For example if after wagering 100 you get 100 back on average, that would be a 100% return to player ratio and would mean that you break even (no edge). The return to player ratio from sports betting is usually around 80-90% depending on the game, as bookmakers will just give you reduced odds of about 10-20%. So instead of giving you odds for example at 2, will pay you at 1.8. With that being said, breaking even at 100% return to player ratio is practically impossible, let alone to manage to get an edge of above 100%.
It's people like Sitaj that ruin it for the rest of us. Honestly, as an aspiring scammer, it's getting harder and harder and I don't know what to do anymore 😢
Using a LLM to make predictions for a problem like this only shows that the guy has absolutely no understanding of how machine learning (or let's use the buzzword: AI) works, and which models to use for what purposes...
"Neural Network Weights" that was clever
So the guy ask for forgivness, putting him in Voidzilla's POV. Gets a second chance, and immediately starts doing the same thing. Very smart.
Siraj Raval is the type of guy who will get out of jail, just to go and commit another crime on his way into town
You gotta start a "consumed by the void" board for scammers that have no chances left
Really wish this was a main channel video so more people see it and potentially avoid being scammed.
Brother, tell us what happened with the Boeing video, surely you can’t be censored for just talking about your experience?
Yes you can lol it happens every day. Some of you are so delusional to the universe around them, but at least more and more people are Awakening to these aspects of existence.
@@austincrowmusic2378yes, the plane company has power over google in order to force them to silently delete videos about an alleged suicide despite the fact theres dozens of high profile videos on the topic the news covered it. Its a really big global conspiracy, guys you gotta believe me.
He posted on Reddit that people in the comments were taking it as 100% fact and not just speculation and he didn't want to spread misinformation. He also said Boeing didn't tell him to remove it.
Dude, that kind of thing has happened quite often.
@@austincrowmusic2378 thanks Mr. Vague Conspiracy Brain, very helpful
The guy wasn't upset that he did it, he was upset that he got caught.
For anyone asking about the deleted video
"I wanted to share my opinion about how strange the circumstances were but 15 min after publication I saw some comments were taking it as fact that the “whistleblower was 100% murdered by Boeing”, as opposed to “whistleblower death is strange/suspicious”.
So after thinking a few more min I removed it to avoid misinfo. This post is just to answer the inevitable “where is the video” questions.
Voidzilla content is a fun way to express myself, but I should’ve kept away from speculating too much on such a serious topic.
No matter how “suspicious” it looks, the investigation is still ongoing and we don’t know what happened. Might revisit the story once the investigation wraps up and give thoughts then.
EDIT: some posters were speculating BOEING made me take it down! Not true at all!"
The spreadhseet he shared with the 20 bets it was hilarious. Even if the bets and outcomes on the spreadsheet were true, people who know about statistics and variance will laugh. There is no "system" that can beat the odds anyway, but if for some reason you want to test your system against the sports odds, to be confident about the system's performance you will need at least 1000 bets to bring the variance down.
If someone is ever offering up their "system" or "way" of making money to you for a cost, but they could easily make 10x by just keeping it to themselves...they are trying to be nice and generous and just help everyone else. 100% a scam, every time.
You could forgive people who do something accidentally or unknowingly, but if someone willfully deceives, they never should be given a second chance. Do so at your own peril.
actions not words, the void knows this.
Not that he cares, but he's shut the door on redemption for any genuinely repentant scammer going forward.
"And for those reasons, I think this is a scam and I'm out" would be a better Sharktank sign-off.
The real question is:
What happened to the video about the Boeing whistleblower that "unalived himself", Mr zilla? I could've sworn I saw a notification about it 😏
Ikr
Wait what??? It was 100% there I definitely watched it. The fact it's gone without comment is super weird
He posted a reddit post about iirc.
Dang
They actually threatened to "Delete" coffee as well so he took it down 😮🤯🔫☠️💧
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me
You...
You cant get fooled again.
@@RHLWnow watch this drive
Once a scammer always a scammer, a leopard nvr changes its spot..
The "Magical AI" scam has really spread far and wide hasn't it
It really hurts for people who really want second chances… and then people do this…
we really are in the golden age of scammers
“We gave him a second chance and he has now *thrown it back, in our face*.” 🤨😳
Did you get a C&D for the Boeing whistleblower story?
r/Coffeezilla_gg you will find answer there
Right! He deleted it after an hour. I’m glad I saw it before it got taken down.
No, people were being weird about it and he took it down. He said on reddit he didn't want people using it as gospel.
I wanted to share my opinion about how strange the circumstances were but 15 min after publication I saw some comments were taking it as fact that the “whistleblower was 100% murdered by Boeing”, as opposed to “whistleblower death is strange/suspicious”.
So after thinking a few more min I removed it to avoid misinfo. This post is just to answer the inevitable “where is the video” questions.
I didn’t get to watch the whole video. I clicked on it and had to stop after 2 minutes. When I returned an hour later the video is gone.
Can someone tell me roughly what Coffee’s take was about the whistleblower incident?
The eternal bar that must be met to determine if something isn't a scam; if this thing is so profitable and good, why are they making money from selling how to access it/do it instead of just putting their time and energy into doing the thing itself?
Always ask yourself this question, folks.
Hey Coffeezilla! Love your videos! One thing, I recommend you to use a solid color instead of blurring the image because people can still unblur the image. Either way! Love the void!!
It’s guys like this that ruin second chances for people that have actually changed their ways. What a shame
“Second chance for Siraj?”
Anybody who refers to themself in the third person cant be taken seriously
Lamont thinks this is excellent advice. Lamont approves.
These people will never change not even after jail time.
I'm genuinely impressed he has a product that is marginally better than flipping a coin. The fact that it isn't worse than that is impressive given the clear intelligence and skill he has in programming and AI design.
Seeing Coff in the end of this video seem so much like those Sharks he used to watch review and invest in products oh so similarly to this years prior makes me have hope in this world. Good job bud, you made it.
And this kids is why we dont GIVE seconds chances. You must EARN your second chance by demonstrating change not in your words but in your actions.
Some people just LOOK like they have no skills of any kind. Dude is one of them.
I love how coffee named the xlsx document Saraj "Win" Record
People never learn. The logic is always simple - if you're SELLING something that promises to make a lot of money fast, you would simply use it yourself exclusively. Or you'd give it away for free. This is an IQ test and the people paying for it have a low score.
Grifters gonna grift