☝️ Just a reminder: The IRL shots are using HDR Photoshop filter, by combining +3-5 shots, with different exposure levels. that's why they look brighter in shadow areas, while maintaining sky details without bleaching. *Plus the contribution of more accurate GI/indirect lighting of course. Inorder to get the closest look: 1- The game must be captured, displayed and viewd in HDR. 2- Or just replicate the same photo processing by merging and tonemaping different aligned captures with different gamma values. (HDR to SDR workflow). There are other video comparisons where IRL vidoes are taken with a standard camera (no HDR engaged), and the results are pretty much close to the real scenes in termes of contrast and colors.
Exactly! That's also what triggers me in all the comments that everyone is now badmouthing everything just because of the servers… The changes are so good and noticeable!
@@wanted3753 Combined with how much smoother it is (especially noticeable in VR) + more advanced physics, I'd state an unequivocal YES...maybe worth twice the price in my book! And remember how far 2020 has come since its early days. We have a lot to look forward to with 2024!
Many early reviewers did not think that 2024 was much of an improvement over 2020, but they were likely comparing photoreal cites to one another. When you fly anywhere else, the improvement is quite noticeable, and night time flying is a vast improvement, as is flying up in the clouds. I am aggravated about all of the bugs, and there are a large number of them, but overall, this promises to be a pretty major improvement.
I am the only one who thinks that trees are so much overpowered in the new game. Take a look, for example to Dubai in 4:34. The entire world become a postapocalyptic jungle 😅
I noticed in general nonwestern regions are represented not nearly as well as western areas. Probably due to less available satellite imagery in those areas.
You are not the only one. In my local area there are too many trees. Look at tekapo New Zealand in both simulators and on Google earth. 2020 shows the desert area correctly. 2024 shows it covered in trees that don't exist in real life. It's so disappointing to see it worse than 2020.
Ray tracing is what gives volume to reality. It is especially noticiable in trees, Paris for instance. It will need a very strong gpu but it is not far away to give a good enough approach to reality.
I explain myself badly. What I mean is reality uses a good ray tracing algorithm and we need to use ray tracing in computers to reach such level 🤣@@exscape
New lighting model is truly amazing. MSFS 2024 is clearly one of the best looking games ever made and this comparison was epic. Loved the background music too.
Si, no hay la menor duda que el 2024 es mejor pero con los problemas que está ofreciendo, me quedo con el 2020 y NO 😅pienso comprarlo por los momentos, talvez dentro de un año cuando ya esté bien probado y le quiten los errores. El FS 2020 es una maravilla y estoy muy satisfecho con su desempeño y yo, no tengo ninguna prisa.
These are all distance shots comparisons. I'd like to see some closer to the ground comparisons, like I mean right from the ground looking at the horizon by buildings or through trees, or even some bush airport comparisons.
Well done to the author for taking great pains to make this video. However, there are still too many differences in the lighting situation to make many of these comparisons truly representative. To be really comparable, they all need to be taken at the same time of day and at the same date and with the same prevailing weather. That would be very hard indeed to do, so we should make allowances as best we can. That said, I think FS2024 is slightly better in most cases. However, interesting as this is, city photogrammetry is not one of the key areas I had been expecting to improve for FS2024. I have been more impressed by the differences at or near ground level in the vegetation and rock formations, and in the behaviour of water and loose surface rocks. I suspect we may yet see even further improvements to some city photogrammetry, in time.
Nice to see FS24 is way more accurate (except for trees, especially in Dubaï, hope it will be fixed soon) and there is still issues in locations where satellite data are not good especially China, Latam, ... hope in upcoming years new place will be available
I didn't even expect the graphics to be better I was just happy it's in gamepass and only 11 GB plus another 16GB rolling cache and the activities. Need a lot of RAM and decent internet though
2024 is so much better than 2020 after playing 50 hours in it. There are so many differences in every aspect of the game, where a dlc or update wouldn't have worked.
I feel like this comparison is misleading. FS 2020 doesn't look like that at all in terms of color. Saturation and contrast seem to have been boosted to make it look bad. And in Paris for example (1:08) the photogrammetry is disabled, whiwh is why the buildings don't look like the 2024 version, when in reality both games benefit of the same photogrammetry.
paris and australia in 2020 were before the world update that actually has photogrametry, so the diference is not that big, still 2024 is way more detail
@@useruserusername472 omg true my wrong, but shadows is not at all in ray tracing! You can see raster shadow in the pyramids scene. Even all reflections are using SSR, not ray tracing
@ all good g ur right it seems RT shadows even when they’re enabled only work for local shadows (eg on the aircraft), not the shadow maps we see on terrain and buildings.
yes i agree, although the trees in 2024 look "better" they are too big and too many in places they shouldn't be and some cities have them looking bigger than skyscrapers! not to mention all the pixelated "cubed trees" mixed in that look like they came from a retro game.
FS 2024 looks very good on a PC but did you know that: This game is totally unplayable on Xbox X because the mouse freelook is overly sensitive. The slightest movement of the mouse results in the view spinning around and around and around probably a dozen times before stopping looking at the cockpit ceiling or floor. Career mode is not possible because of this. This problem is reported to Microsoft Flight Sim Forums, but still no response or solution. Microsoft didn't even give a refund. It's a total disgrace. I don't understand how they managed to miss this bug. You notice it the first 5 minutes after installing the game on Xbox X.
All that shading which is ridiculously dark is built into the sim. It could be fixed by and uploaded. Those "shady" area's are ridiculous. Look out a window right now,do shady areas look like that?
LoL @ Cairo in FS2024 becoming a city in the jungle ahahh , ways better on 2020. Same for Dubai... trees everywhere... it's like we did a jump back to 1st edition of FS2020
Video is off. FS2020 looks way better than shown in the video in photogrametric areas. In fact FS2024 looks worse than FS2020 in a lot of photogrametric cities, trees are messed up and resolution of terrain not better...
es lo que logra el google maps y la ia, pero termina siendo una simple imagen modelada en 3d, no hay coches no hay nada en movimiento.....te lo quieren vender como si estuviera procesando un mundo a lo gta
Haber cria cucarachas de sony, primero juegalo y luego opinas si hay coches movimiento y para la tremenda escala que es todo el mundo obviamente usan tecnología de mapeado inútil.
Not a very good comparison. There are too often not the same cloud coverage or time of day or season, and some of the real images seem composited or filtered.
Very misleading video. On most 2020 pictures, photogrammetry and expansion updates are turned off. (unless this is just comparing the vanilla versions! On 2024 Lighting is better, ground detail is better, but the way was presented here is misleading.
Wow the graphics on Reality are pretty crisp, almost looks real
☝️ Just a reminder:
The IRL shots are using HDR Photoshop filter, by combining +3-5 shots, with different exposure levels.
that's why they look brighter in shadow areas, while maintaining sky details without bleaching.
*Plus the contribution of more accurate GI/indirect lighting of course.
Inorder to get the closest look:
1- The game must be captured, displayed and viewd in HDR.
2- Or just replicate the same photo processing by merging and tonemaping different aligned captures with different gamma values. (HDR to SDR workflow).
There are other video comparisons where IRL vidoes are taken with a standard camera (no HDR engaged), and the results are pretty much close to the real scenes in termes of contrast and colors.
Or how bout take the reality pictures without all the combing 3-5 shots?
very tech explanation! I can t understand
@@nehuge that's the point 👌
People are clowning FS2024, but the improvements are noticeable.
Exactly! That's also what triggers me in all the comments that everyone is now badmouthing everything just because of the servers… The changes are so good and noticeable!
Nope, the guy in the video had no 2020 world updates installed
Yes, and they are clowning because their PC can’t run it smoothly, so just blame the sim
The value 80€ ?
@@wanted3753 Combined with how much smoother it is (especially noticeable in VR) + more advanced physics, I'd state an unequivocal YES...maybe worth twice the price in my book! And remember how far 2020 has come since its early days. We have a lot to look forward to with 2024!
Many early reviewers did not think that 2024 was much of an improvement over 2020, but they were likely comparing photoreal cites to one another. When you fly anywhere else, the improvement is quite noticeable, and night time flying is a vast improvement, as is flying up in the clouds. I am aggravated about all of the bugs, and there are a large number of them, but overall, this promises to be a pretty major improvement.
I am the only one who thinks that trees are so much overpowered in the new game. Take a look, for example to Dubai in 4:34. The entire world become a postapocalyptic jungle 😅
I noticed in general nonwestern regions are represented not nearly as well as western areas. Probably due to less available satellite imagery in those areas.
Dont be dissing 2024 youl have all the fan boys after you, just say 2024 is the very best ever and will only get better, no problems here.
You are not the only one. In my local area there are too many trees. Look at tekapo New Zealand in both simulators and on Google earth. 2020 shows the desert area correctly. 2024 shows it covered in trees that don't exist in real life. It's so disappointing to see it worse than 2020.
Omg the Reality looks so nice
you should go more outside
@@hassan.burani8248 VOAR MAIS né?
Singapore looks far better in 2024, but there are some good mods for 2020. The bridge isn’t there in Singapore but its is in 2024.
The reality version looks the best i will buy that one
It will be the most expensive one, by far - but without any glitches!
ohh no... give me fantasy over reality any day
It's honestly really impressive what they acomlished. Especially with buildings that there not placed by hand, they detail is so much better
Ray tracing is what gives volume to reality. It is especially noticiable in trees, Paris for instance. It will need a very strong gpu but it is not far away to give a good enough approach to reality.
MSFS 2024 only uses ray tracing for shadows. It does have a new non-ray traced lighting system though.
I explain myself badly. What I mean is reality uses a good ray tracing algorithm and we need to use ray tracing in computers to reach such level 🤣@@exscape
Great job! -An Art Director in advertising
UPGRADE ⬆️⬆️👍🏻
Nope, this guy in the video had no world updates installed in 2020
Also paris and other places no photogrammetry activated in 2020 but in 2024, apples and oranges comparison.
New lighting model is truly amazing. MSFS 2024 is clearly one of the best looking games ever made and this comparison was epic. Loved the background music too.
FS2024 is right in between FS2020 and real life
Реальная это игра игра. ФС 2024 это то где мы живём
There's still a big difference between fs2024 and reality. Moreover this comparison should be made in little unknown cities and towns.
Everything looks good but Shanghai they fuc**d up
Si, no hay la menor duda que el 2024 es mejor pero con los problemas que está ofreciendo, me quedo con el 2020 y NO 😅pienso comprarlo por los momentos, talvez dentro de un año cuando ya esté bien probado y le quiten los errores. El FS 2020 es una maravilla y estoy muy satisfecho con su desempeño y yo, no tengo ninguna prisa.
You can use nVidia App filters to reduce the ridiculously over the top colour saturation.
These are all distance shots comparisons. I'd like to see some closer to the ground comparisons, like I mean right from the ground looking at the horizon by buildings or through trees, or even some bush airport comparisons.
Buen video (aun no lo he visto)
can't wait to see FS 2028 @ 8K!
Cool it with the trees, 2024!
NYC is the most polite city in the world
Well done to the author for taking great pains to make this video.
However, there are still too many differences in the lighting situation to make many of these comparisons truly representative. To be really comparable, they all need to be taken at the same time of day and at the same date and with the same prevailing weather. That would be very hard indeed to do, so we should make allowances as best we can.
That said, I think FS2024 is slightly better in most cases.
However, interesting as this is, city photogrammetry is not one of the key areas I had been expecting to improve for FS2024.
I have been more impressed by the differences at or near ground level in the vegetation and rock formations, and in the behaviour of water and loose surface rocks.
I suspect we may yet see even further improvements to some city photogrammetry, in time.
Nice to see FS24 is way more accurate (except for trees, especially in Dubaï, hope it will be fixed soon)
and there is still issues in locations where satellite data are not good especially China, Latam, ... hope in upcoming years new place will be available
Will there be an xbox series vs pc comparison?
Fs2024 has much better 3d model especially in terrain detail, rural area, small town etc
Nope, this guy in the video had no world updates installed in 2020
I didn't even expect the graphics to be better I was just happy it's in gamepass and only 11 GB plus another 16GB rolling cache and the activities. Need a lot of RAM and decent internet though
I wish I loved anything as much as FS2024 loves putting giant trees in the middle of buildings for no reason.
2024 is so much better than 2020 after playing 50 hours in it. There are so many differences in every aspect of the game, where a dlc or update wouldn't have worked.
I feel like this comparison is misleading. FS 2020 doesn't look like that at all in terms of color. Saturation and contrast seem to have been boosted to make it look bad.
And in Paris for example (1:08) the photogrammetry is disabled, whiwh is why the buildings don't look like the 2024 version, when in reality both games benefit of the same photogrammetry.
Although fs2024 does a better job, I believe they overdone with trees, they should be smaller by a factor or two.
I think the game should rework the colors even more.
Miss this on my ps5 :(
Tu ps5 no puede mover esto. Solo el poder de Xbox está a la altura 😅
@@victorio681 si lo mueve la series heces que es 3 veces mas culera que un ps5.....
@@victorio681si seguro es por eso y no porque es exclusivo de xbox
lol who cares in Europe about games like this or Halo
probably will get ported sooner or later now that ms has shifted strategies
paris and australia in 2020 were before the world update that actually has photogrametry, so the diference is not that big, still 2024 is way more detail
Miss Ray Tracing for sure here! The models of FS2024 are awasome but need something more to make a photo-realistic scene
RT shadows are implemented in this title. They actually are the main obvious difference.
@oropher1234 mmh no, this game doesn't support any kind of Ray Tracing. Get some information before talking
@@OmnianMIUbro what 😂😂 it literally does
@@useruserusername472 omg true my wrong, but shadows is not at all in ray tracing! You can see raster shadow in the pyramids scene. Even all reflections are using SSR, not ray tracing
@ all good g ur right it seems RT shadows even when they’re enabled only work for local shadows (eg on the aircraft), not the shadow maps we see on terrain and buildings.
Overall, too many trees everywhere.
yes i agree, although the trees in 2024 look "better" they are too big and too many in places they shouldn't be and some cities have them looking bigger than skyscrapers! not to mention all the pixelated "cubed trees" mixed in that look like they came from a retro game.
Why are your skies in mfs 2020 and 2024 so bright ? They don’t seem to actually look like that in game
The screen capture process has messed up HDR exposure, gamma and tone mapping settings.
2020 and 2024 is so similar it's not worth a 80$ difference
Trees are too big in both versions.
REX Accuseason will give you shorter and more irregular trees. Will be out soon for FS24.
Increible el upgrade siendo misma generacion
actually, MSFS 2024 uses the same datas but MSFS 2024 uses RTX technology...so, it looks like more real and the lights are brighter than the 2020's...
TIL, shadow intensity is set lower IRL.
Only difference between 2024 and reality is that in the former is covid era
AirPano is damn good, guess I pick my VR headset
6:41 Se ve mejor que el real
Looks so similar you wont even notice the difference if you was playing the game and not looking at this video
I feel like this video still looks off, did you add filters to MSFS? The contrast looks completely blown out
I think flight sim 2020’s lighting is a bit darker
They sold the same game back to the muppets...
And more expansive
FS 2024 looks very good on a PC but did you know that:
This game is totally unplayable on Xbox X because the mouse freelook is overly sensitive. The slightest movement of the mouse results in the view spinning around and around and around probably a dozen times before stopping looking at the cockpit ceiling or floor. Career mode is not possible because of this. This problem is reported to Microsoft Flight Sim Forums, but still no response or solution. Microsoft didn't even give a refund. It's a total disgrace. I don't understand how they managed to miss this bug. You notice it the first 5 minutes after installing the game on Xbox X.
Yes!! 0:31 , a Berabee song again! 😃
All that shading which is ridiculously dark is built into the sim. It could be fixed by and uploaded. Those "shady" area's are ridiculous. Look out a window right now,do shady areas look like that?
Upgrade modo Dios , es hermoso
LoL @ Cairo in FS2024 becoming a city in the jungle ahahh , ways better on 2020. Same for Dubai... trees everywhere... it's like we did a jump back to 1st edition of FS2020
The usual... the amount of trees in 2024 is overexaggerated! (for worse) 🙄I hope they fix that in future updates or Rex AccuSeason compatibility
Time stamp 1:52 why is there just a random tall building in fs24 on the far right 😂
Reality doesn't like reality.
Podrías hacerlo con todas las capitales de España?
Video is off. FS2020 looks way better than shown in the video in photogrametric areas. In fact FS2024 looks worse than FS2020 in a lot of photogrametric cities, trees are messed up and resolution of terrain not better...
The night is a total difference look at Madrid, it’s far better then 2020.
es lo que logra el google maps y la ia, pero termina siendo una simple imagen modelada en 3d, no hay coches no hay nada en movimiento.....te lo quieren vender como si estuviera procesando un mundo a lo gta
Si hay coches y barcos
Si razonas la escala del juego ? 😂😂😂
Haber cria cucarachas de sony, primero juegalo y luego opinas si hay coches movimiento y para la tremenda escala que es todo el mundo obviamente usan tecnología de mapeado inútil.
It’s time for some world updates 😉
Que poderío Gráfico Santo Dios.
El analista de bits no lo dice pero me confesó vía email que las imágenes son de Series X madre mía !
Que fumas amigo?
@ La pipa de la verdad
@@JonathanGodoy-wi7jf los clonyes no puden dejar de llorar un minuto?
To be far the base it on google maps or other maps the used in the past was
Me crying with 1050ti
Not a very good comparison. There are too often not the same cloud coverage or time of day or season, and some of the real images seem composited or filtered.
falta mucho por mejorar en cuento al modelado de algunos de los tantos edificios y estructuras que se ven peor que FS2020
reality version looks so cool
Whatever filter you used on the game screens is awful! Makes both games look way too saturated and contrasty.
Real life shots have too many trees
TERABIPPPP!!! ✈✈✈
Those screenshots are clearly edited = nonsense comparison.
Where is indonesian, in Jakarta Monas, Bali, Palembang, Lombok Mandalika, IKN
como se llama el instrumental .
Very misleading video. On most 2020 pictures, photogrammetry and expansion updates are turned off. (unless this is just comparing the vanilla versions! On 2024 Lighting is better, ground detail is better, but the way was presented here is misleading.
Editing the MSFS pictures makes this video kind of nonsense...
*BRASIL
Reality is good
You needed to show also Seoul or Tokyo😢
REALITY BY AIRPANO LOOKS VERY REAL ...I LOVE THAT VERSION THE BEST
Ya me ví el vídeo bro, puedes borrarlo 🔥
8:42 Yikes
Cyberpunk ps5 vs ps5 pro
PS5 PRO is a MONSTER it would look like the one on the left 😨😨😨😨
😂😂😂😂 keep dreaming buddy😂😂😂😂
PlayStation kids are special kind of stupid.
😂😂😂😂😂
Ps5 pro is a scam
Bad video, photos and screens has been taken on the another time. Look at shadows
Resident evil 4 remake ps5 vs pro vs XSX vs pc please❤
hmmmm just some visual updates charged in an entire new gamne? wtf
Bruhh what about the entire new career mode?
New career mode and new physics, not just graphics.